Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Mar 6;15(3):e0230286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230286

Changes in the secondary compounds of persimmon leaves as a defense against circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae

Oliul Hassan 1, Taehyun Chang 1,*, Abul Hossain 2
Editor: Branislav T Šiler3
PMCID: PMC7059969  PMID: 32142558

Abstract

Circular leaf spot, caused by the ascomycetous fungus Plurivorosphaerella nawae (= Mycosphaerella nawae), is the most problematic fungal disease of persimmon worldwide. In Korea, persimmon exposed to P. nawae inoculum (ascospores) from May to August shows visible circular leaf spot disease symptoms from the end of August to early September. It is important to identify factors affecting this long latent period. The objective of this study was to elucidate the relation between the development of symptom of circular leaf spot and the content of phenolics compounds and vitamin C as well as the antioxidant activities in leaves. Healthy leaves (both young and old) and infected leaves of circular leaf spot-susceptible persimmon cultivar were harvested in 2016. The content of phenolics (total phenols, flavonoids, and tannins) and vitamin C, and their antioxidant activities were analyzed in all types of leaves. Compared with the asymptomatic leaves (old) and the asymptomatic parts of the infected leaves, the symptomatic parts of the infected leaves, symptomatic leaves, and asymptomatic young leaves showed significantly higher content of phenolics and vitamin C, and higher antioxidant activities. Disease incidence and severity were estimated for older leaves (emerged in early May) and younger leaves (emerged at the end of June) in 2017 and 2018. The AUDPC was higher in old leaves than younger leaves. The disease progression was much faster and severe in the older than in the younger leaves. Similar results were found in field experiments. Higher content of phenolics and antioxidant activities in the younger leaves may contribute to circular leaf spot resistance in persimmon. Furthermore, accumulation of phenolics and antioxidant activity in the infected leaves is a post-infection response and the first stage of the defense mechanism.

Introduction

Circular leaf spot of persimmon (CLSP), caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae (basionym:- Mycosphaerella nawae), is a very problematic disease, causing leaf necrosis, premature leaf fall, early ripening of fruits, and fruit abscission[1,2,3,4). It is a foliar disease affecting persimmon worldwide, including South Korea, Japan, and Spain [2,3,4]. The disease cycle of CLSP has been described by several studies in Japan, Korea, and Spain [2,5,6]. The CLSP fungus survives during the winter as small black fruiting bodies (pseudothecia) in leaf litter. In Korea, this black fruiting body develops in the back side of the spots on persimmon leaves from October to November in different shapes, such as spherical ovoid, oval, and flask- and pear-type [6,7]. Pseudothecia become sclerotium-like before extreme winter and increases in the following years in the middle or late April [7,8]. The ascospores (sexual spores) in pseudothecia reach maturity by the end of April as temperature rises in the spring [7,8]. The ascospores get forcibly ejected from pseudothecia into the air and germinate on leaf surface. After a long quiescent period, typical CLSP symptoms appear on leaves at the end of August [1,7]. Owing to the long quiescent period, it is difficult to control CLSP at the initial stages of infection. In severe case CLSP is responsible 100% yield loss [1]. Persimmon growers are managing this disease through treatment with multiple fungicides (benomyl, mancozeb and trifloxystrobin). Resistant or tolerant cultivars have not been developed in Korea yet.

Phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites and are ubiquitous in all types of plants [9]. The functions of phenolic compounds are pigmentation of flowers and fruits, plant growth, incorporation of attractive substances to accelerate pollination, and seed dispersal [10,11]. In addition, phenolic compounds play an important role in plants defense against pathogens [12,13]. The phenolic compounds act as pesticides against plant-invading pathogens including bacteria, fungi, and nematodes [12]. The oxidation products of phenolic compounds are responsible for cytotoxicity, which is the basis for plant disease resistance [14,15]. Involvement of some phenolic compounds like flavan-3-ols in injury and stress resistance is proposed [15]. Anti-pathogenic activities of phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, etc., are well known [16,17]. The leaves of persimmon are used in preparing green tea because of the presence of different nutritious elements including flavonoids, tannins, and ascorbic acid [18,19,20]. Numerous scientific reports suggest the involvement of flavonoids in UV-scavenging, fertility, and plant defense against pathogens [15,21,22]. There is a positive correlation between the levels of flavonoids in the leaves and resistance against fungal pathogens, especially Venturia inaequalis [23]. Higher quantities of phenolic compounds have been reported in V. inaequalis-resistant apple cultivars than in the susceptible apple cultivars [24]. Phenolic compounds have also been reported as the most influential secondary metabolites in determining the resistance of pearl millet plants to Sclerospora graminicola, cowpea to Black eye cowpea mosaic virus, and raspberry to Didymella applanata and Paraconiothyrium fuckelii [17,25,26]. Tannins, another class of secondary metabolites, also influence plant resistance to pathogens and herbivores [27,28,29]. Tannins can inhibit spore germination and germ tube growth of Verticillium albo-atrum [29]. Resistance of common beans against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Pseudocercospora griseola, and Xanthomonas campestris is associated with higher tannin levels in the seed coat [27]. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is a major antioxidant compound associated with plant antioxidant-defense systems [30]. Vitamin C is involved directly or indirectly in protecting plants against pathogen invasion by interacting with the key components of a complex network regulating both basal and induced resistance in different pathosystems [31]. In coordination with glutathione (GSH) and important enzymatic antioxidants, vitamin C create redox environment in plant, which regulating diverse defense pathways such as the expression of defense genes, the strengthening of cell walls, and the modulation of defense-hormonal signaling networks [31].

There are some reports on the antioxidant properties and efficacies of persimmon leaves [20,32,33]. However, the effect of the antioxidant properties on CLSP development has been inadequately studied. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the patterns of occurrence of some phenolics and vitamin C in the healthy and CLSP infected leaves to elucidate the relation between the levels of these components and the development of CLSP.

Materials and methods

Plant material and field conditions

The study was carried out in 2016 using the leaves of five-year-old persimmon trees (cultivar ‘Dongsi’ were grafted onto rootstock, Diospyros lotus), growing in Sangju, South Korea. The orchard was irrigated by using under-canopy sprinkler (Low Elevation Spray Application) irrigation system. The experimental orchard is known CLSP hot-spots and fungicides were not sprayed before and during the study period. Fully developed symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves were collected from the persimmon tree twice, on May 27 (flowering stage) and September 20 (after circular leaf spot disease symptom expression). Phenolic compounds (total phenols, total flavonoids, and total tannins), vitamin C, and antioxidant activities (elucidated by estimating the quenching of 2,2-diphenyl-1-2picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) activities) were analyzed in the asymptomatic leaves collected on May 27 (H1) and September 20 (H2), symptomatic leaves (collected on September 20) with 75–100% disease severity (D), and asymptomatic (1/2 H) and symptomatic parts (1/2 D) of the infected leaves (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Different types of leaves.

Fig 1

A. asymptomatic leaf at two collection time point (H1, H2). B. symptomatic leaf (D). C. Diseased containing 1/2 healthy part (1/2 H, 1/2 D).

Processing and preparation of aqueous extracts of the collected persimmon leaves

Aqueous extract of the persimmon leaves was processed and prepared according to the procedure described by Hossain et a. [34]. The collected leaves were air dried at 100°C for 30 min after blanching at 100°C for 2 min. The dried leaves were homogenized to fine powder (≤ 1 mm particle sized) using a Waring commercial blender (PBB25 Stainless Steel Blender, Stamford; Connecticut, USA). Leaf powder was soaked in distilled water in the ratio of 1:10 (w/w) at 90°C for 60 min to extract the leaf contents. The extracts were filtered through Whatman no. 4 filter paper (110 mm ∅, Whatman International Limited, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). The filtrates were collected and stored at 4°C until further use.

Determination of total phenolic content

Total phenolic content was estimated with Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent according to the procedure described by Singleton and Rossi [35], with slight modifications. Briefly, 0.2 mL of the filtrate sample solution was reacted with 1 mL of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent (Sigma Chemicals, St Louis, MO, USA) in a flask. After 10 min, 0.8 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) was added to the reaction mixture and was incubated at room temperature (25°C) for 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Serially diluted gallic acid solution (0–200 mg/L) was used as a standard. Results were expressed as milligram of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry matter (mg GAE/g).

Determination of total flavonoid content

Total flavonoid content of the collected persimmon leaves was determined by modified colorimetric methods using catechin as a standard compound [36]. Catechin is well known flavonoid used as standard [20]. Catechin solution (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 mg/L) was used as standard. A volume of 0.25 mL of the filtrate was taken in a test tube along with 1 mL of distilled water. After adding 75 μL of a 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO2) solution, the mixture was allowed to stand for 6 min. Subsequently, 150 μL of 10% aluminum chloride (AlCl3) was added and incubated for 5 min, after which 0.5 mL of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added, followed by the addition of 2 mL distilled water. Finally, the absorbance was read against a blank at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan). Total flavonoid content was expressed as milligram of catechin equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg CE/g).

Determination of tannin content

Total tannin content was estimated according to the modified method of Broadhurst and Jones [37], as described by Xu and Chang [38], using catechin as a reference compound. A mixture of 0.5 mL of the persimmon leaf filtrate, 3 mL of a 4% vanillin in methanol, and 1.5 mL of hydrochloric acid (conc.) was prepared and incubated at 25°C for 15 min. Subsequently, the absorbance was read at 500 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp.) against a methanol blank. Results were expressed as milligram of catechin equivalent per gram of dry matter (mg CE/g).

DPPH radical scavenging activity

Quenching of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity by persimmon leaf extract was evaluated according to the method described by Shahidi et. al. [39] with some modifications. Persimmon leaf extract was diluted (1 mL extract/5 mL methanol), and 3.9 mL of DPPH solution in methanol (methanol: water = 80:20; final content = 0.025 mg/mL) was added to 0.1 mL of diluted persimmon leaf extract. The mixture was vortexed for 1 min and allowed to stand at the ambient temperature (≥ 25°C) for 30 min. Subsequently, the absorbance was measured at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corp.). The percentage of antioxidant activity was calculated according to the following equation:

%inhibitionofDPPH=[(AcontrolAsample)/Acontrol]×100. (i)

Where, Acontrol is the absorbance of the DPPH solution only.

ABTS radical-scavenging activity

The ABTS scavenging activity of persimmon leaf extract was determined by methods of Thaipong et al. [40] with some modifications. The working solution was prepared by mixing equal quantities of 7.4 mM ABTS solution and 2.6 mM potassium persulfate solution. After incubating it in the dark at room temperature (25°C) for 12 h, the working solution was diluted by adding 1 mL of ABTS mixture to 24 mL of ethanol, to obtain an absorbance of 1.5 ± 0.02 at 734 nm using a spectrophotometer. Fresh ABTS solution was used for each assay. Finally, 0.3 mL of leaf extract was added with 2.7 mL of the ABTS working solution. Then the absorbance was measured after 7 min at 734 nm. The results were expressed as percentage (%) and calculated according to the formula:

Scavengingactivity(%)=100[(O.D.ofsample/O.D.ofcontrol)×100]. (ii)

Where, O.D. is the observed data and control represent the absorbance of the ABTS solution.

Determination of total vitamin C content

Vitamin C was quantified according to the modified simple UV-spectrophotometric method described by Khan et al. [41]. Briefly, collected leaves were freeze dried for 72 h in a vacuum freeze dryer at -50°C and blended for making powder [20,34]. 5 g of persimmon leaf powder was homogenized with 25 mL of 3% metaphosphoric acid-8% acetic acid (MPA-AA) solution, transferred into a 50 mL volumetric jar, and shaken gently to homogenize the solution. It was diluted up to the mark using the same MPA-AA solution. The dilutes solution was then filtered using Buchner funnel with paper filter (Buchner funnel vacuum filtration). The filtered clear sample solution was collected and 4–5 drops of bromine water was added until the solution developed red color. For eliminating the extra bromine and obtaining a clear solution, two to four drops of 10% thiourea (CH4N2S) solution was added. Serially diluted standard ascorbic acid solutions (0–250 ppm) were prepared from 500-ppm stock solution (Signa-Aldrich). Then 1 mL of 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (2,4-DNPH) solution was added to all the standard solutions and the oxidized sample solution. The standard, sample, and blank solutions were incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 3 h. After incubation and cooled on ice bath, all the solutions (standard, sample, and blank) were treated with 1 ml 85% sulfuric acid. Then the absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer at 521 nm.

Disease evaluation in field experiment

Disease severity was evaluated under field and control conditions (described below). For the experiment under field conditions, five trees (one-tree plots) of cultivar Dongsi grafted on rootstock Diospyros lotus were randomly selected in the experimental area in Kyungpook National university farm (KNU farm) and Woeanum orchards (WO), Sangju, Korea. The age of persimmon in KNU farm and WO were around 4 and 5 years, respectively. The orchard was irrigated by using under-canopy sprinkler (Low Elevation Spray Application) irrigation system. No fungicide was used in either orchard. The disease severity was estimated in August 23 and 30; September 6, 13, and 20; and October 4 and 11 in both years, 2017 and 2018. Ten shoots sprouted in early May (old shoots) and ten shoots sprouted around mid- June (new shoots) were randomly selected for the disease assessment in each tree. All the leaves on old shoots (old leaves) (approx. 50 leaves per tree) and new shoots (new leaves) (approx. 50 leaves per tree) were rated on the following scale: 0 = no disease; 1 = 1% of leaf area affected; 2 = 5% of leaf area affected; 3 = 10% of leaf area affected 4 = 25% of leaf area affected; 5 = 50% of leaf area affected; and 6 = 75% of leaf area affected and defoliation occurred.

Disease severity (DS) was calculated using Townsend-Heuberger’s formula [42]:

DS(%)=nvNV×100. (iii)

Where, n = degree of infection on the 6-grade scale, v = number of leaves per category, V = total number of leaves assessed, N = the highest degree of infection.

Area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was estimated from estimated percent of disease severity recorded at different times in R package ‘stats’ (version 3. 4.1) [43]. AUDPC was calculated using midpoint formula [44]:

AUDPC=i=1Ni1(yi+yi+12)(ti+1ti). (iv)

Where t = the time of each reading, y = the percentage of disease severity at each reading and n = the number of readings and t = time.

Disease progression curve was constructed using AUDPC as a summary of disease severity to compare the differences between the old and younger leaves.

Experiment under controlled condition

The effect of leaf age on CLSP development was evaluated on approx. 2-year old persimmon seedlings. For this assay, potted persimmon seedlings (cultivar ‘Dongsi’ were grafted onto rootstock, Diospyros) were managed in an isolated place (Kyungpook National University Sangju campus). Potted seedlings with two leaf ages were developed by pruning of old leaves. Seedling with first emerging leaves (between end of the April and early May) were treated as old leaves. Seedling with emerging leaves around 15th June were considered as younger leaves. The seedlings were inoculated by spraying with fresh ascospore suspension (1×106 ml-1) two times. Seedlings were inoculated on 23rd and 28th of June. The primary spore suspension was obtained by soaking overwintering diseased leaves (only lesion) in ultra-pure water. The concentration of the primary spore suspension was measured using a hemocytometer and then working spore suspension was prepared. Seven seedlings per treatment were used. Disease severity were assessed on September 8, 15, 22 and 29; and October 10 on the scale described above. AUDPC was calculated as described above.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS 9.3) program. Data were then analyzed by parametric tests such as one-way ANOVA and each treatment were compared using least significant difference test (LSD) (α = 0.05). The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate and pentaplicate measurements. The total accumulated AUDPC until t = tk was also analyzed using ANOVA. Then, the total accumulated AUDPC each treatment (old leaves and younger leaves) were compared using least significant difference test (LSD) (α = 0.05).

Results

Total phenolic compounds, flavonoid, tannin, and vitamin C contents

Total content of phenolics, flavonoids, tannins, and vitamin C in different types of persimmon leaves are shown in Figs 2 and 3. The total phenolic content in the H1 leaves ranged from 58.015 to 58.16 mg GAE/g (mean = 58.06 mg GAE/g); in the H2 leaves, from 21.20 to 21.34 mg GAE/g (mean = 21.24 mg GAE/g); in the D leaves, from 43.32 to 43.77 mg GAE/g (mean = 43.52 mg GAE/g); in the 1/2H leaves, from 19.53 to 19.68 mg GAE/g (mean = 19.58 mg GAE/g); and in the 1/2D leaves, from 37.25 to 37.40 mg GAE/g (mean = 37.30 mg GAE/g). There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) among the mean total phenolic content of the H1, H2, and D leaves and between those of the 1/2 H and 1/2 D leaves.

Fig 2. Phenolic compounds and vitamin C content in persimmon leaves.

Fig 2

H1: asymptomatic leaf (mid-May); H2: asymptomatic leaf (beginning of September); and D: symptomatic leaves infected with Plurivorosphaerella nawae. Different letters indicate that the means are significantly different at 95% confidence level.

Fig 3. Phenolic compound and vitamin C content in 1/2 H: asymptomatic part of infected leaf and 1/2 D: symptomatic part of infected leaf.

Fig 3

Different letters indicate that the means are significantly different at 95% confidence level.

The total flavonoid content in the H1 leaves ranged from 14.16 to 15.83 mg CE/g (mean = 14.86 mg CE/g); in the H2 leaves, from 5.41 to 7.08 mg CE/g (mean = 6.11 mg CE/g); in the D leaves, from 12.09 to 12.07 mg CE/g (mean = 12.08 mg CE/g); in the 1/2 H leaves, from 5.83 to 7.08 mg CE/g (mean = 6.38 mg CE/g); and in the 1/2 D leaves, from 10 to 10.83 mg CE/g (mean = 10.41 mg CE/g). There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) among the mean total flavonoid content of the H1, H2, and D leaves and between those of the 1/2 H and 1/2 D leaves.

The tannin content in the different types of leaves showed a trend that was similar to that of the phenolic and flavonoid content. The tannin content in the H1 leaves ranged from 32.38 to 35.46 mg CE/g (mean = 33.66 mg CE/g); in the H2 leaves, from 3.15 to 5.46 mg CE/g (mean = 4.43 mg CE/g); in the D leaves, from 27 to 30.07 mg CE/g (mean = 28.79 mg CE/g); in the 1/2 H leaves, from 2.84 to 3.46 mg CE/g (mean = 3.13 mg CE/g); and in the 1/2 D leaves, from 18.53 to 19.30 mg CE/g (mean = 19.05 mg CE/g). There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) among the mean tannin content of the H1, H2, and D leaves and between those of the 1/2 H and 1/2 D leaves.

Vitamin C content in the H1 leaves ranged from 12.6 to 14.6 mg CE/g (mean = 13.93 mg CE/g); in the H2 leaves, from 0.6 to 2.6 mg CE/g (mean = 1.27 mg CE/g); in the D leaves, from 6.56 to 8.7 mg CE/g (mean = 7.27 mg CE/g); in the 1/2H leaves, from 0.6 to 2.46 mg CE/g (mean = 1.93 mg CE/g); and in the 1/2D leaves, from 4.53 to 6.30 mg CE/g (mean = 5.27 mg CE/g). There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) among the mean vitamin C content of the H1, H2, and D leaves and between those of the 1/2 H and 1/2 D leaves.

Antioxidant activities

The DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activities of the different types of persimmon leaves are shown in Fig 4. The DPPH radical-scavenging activity in the H1 leaves ranged from 42.11 to 42.65% (mean = 42.28%); in the H2 leaves, from 26.50 to 27.22% (mean = 26.8%); in the D leaves, from 34.30 to 34.48% (mean = 34.41%); in the 1/2 H leaves, from 26.50 to 27.04% (mean = 26.67%) and in the 1/2 D leaves, from 34.30 to 34.48% (mean = 34.42%).

Fig 4. Antioxidant activity in H1: asymptomatic leaf (early stage); H2: asymptomatic leaf (collected during the infection period); and D: symptomatic leaf; 1/2 H: asymptomatic part of infected leaf; 1/2 D: symptomatic part of the leaf infected with Plurivorosphaerella nawae.

Fig 4

Different letters indicate that the means are significantly different at 95% confidence level.

The ABTS radical-scavenging activity in the H1 leaves ranged from 75.24.11 to 75.37% (mean = 75.31%); in the H2 leaves, from 34.76 to 35.32% (mean = 35.02%); in the D leaves, from 65.38 to 65.84% (mean = 65.69%); in the 1/2 H leaves, from 34.41 to 34.67% (mean = 34.52%); and in the 1/2 D leaves, from 56.31 to 56.57% (mean = 56.47%). There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) among the mean DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activities of the H1, H2, and D leaves and between those of the 1/2 H and 1/2 D leaves.

Disease progress

The AUPDC in the old leaves was significantly higher than that of the new leaves in both the orchards in 2017 and 2018 (Fig 5). Both year early disease initiation, faster rates of disease development, and higher final disease severities were recorded for old leaves (Fig 5). First signs of CLSP appeared in the old leaves at the end of August, and high disease severity occurred in mid-October. In both years, the disease progress curves for old leaves reached a level ranging from 53 to 98% severity, while for the younger leaves reached severity levels ranging from 3% to 28% (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Circular leaf spot in older and younger leaves of persimmon under field condition.

Fig 5

A. Symptoms of CLSP in older and younger leaves. B. The AUDPC of ceircular leaf spot in older and younger leaves C. Area under the disease progress curve to compare disease severity between older and younger leaves at different orchards in 2017 and 2018.

Under controlled conditions, signs of CLSP appeared in the old leaves at the early September while CLSP appeared in the new leaves in mid-September. As similar with the result of field experiment, AUPDC in old leaves was significantly higher than younger leaves (Fig 6). The disease progress curves showed that diseases severity recorded for old leaves reached at 99%; for the younger leaves, it reached about 32% (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Circular leaf spot in older and younger leaves of persimmon under control condition.

Fig 6

A. CLSP severity on older and younger leaves containing seedling. B. The AUDPC of ceircular leaf spot in older and younger leaves inoculated with ascospore of P. nawae. C. Area under the disease progress curve to compare disease severity between older and younger leaves.

Discussion

A number of fungal disease challenges persimmon cultivation. Among them, CLSP caused by P. nawae is a widespread and destructive disease. Plurivorosphaerella nawae infection does not kill persimmon trees, but decreases the yield by causing leaf necrosis, premature leaf fall, early ripening of fruits, and fruit abscission [3,4]. To limit disease severity, plants synthesize phenolic compounds (phenols, phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, etc.) [16,17]. The green leaves of persimmon are rich in flavonoids, tannins, ascorbic acid [18,19,20]. In this study, we investigated the roles of total phenol content, total flavonoids, tannins, and vitamin C in the defense of persimmon against P. nawae infection. Our results showed that the asymptomatic leaves (H1) collected at the end of May contained significantly higher content of total phenols, total flavonoids, tannins, and vitamin C, when compared with the asymptomatic leaves (H2) and symptomatic leaves (D) collected during the disease period. Furthermore, the asymptomatic leaves (H2) contained significantly lower content of total phenols, total flavonoids, tannins, and vitamin C, when compared with the symptomatic leaves (D) collected during the disease period (Fig 2). Anti-oxidant activities (DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging activities) were also found to be significantly high in H1, followed by D and H2 (Fig 4). The phenolic compounds, vitamin C, and both the anti-oxidant activities were significantly higher in the symptomatic part (1/2 D) than in the asymptomatic part (1/2 H) of the same leaf (Fig 3). The high content of total phenols, total flavonoids, tannins, and vitamin C in the H1 leaves are consistent with the findings of Jung and Jeong [33], who found that the extract of persimmon leaves harvested in May showed the highest levels of total phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and DPPH free radical-scavenging activities, compared with the levels in the extract of leaves collected in other months. As the content of phenolic compounds in persimmon leaves decrease after May, this study found the lowest level of phenolic compounds in the H2 leaves. Interestingly, higher levels of phenolic compounds and vitamin C were observed in the symptomatic leaves (D) than in the H2 leaves, although both types of leaves were collected at the same time. This can be explained by basal resistance, which is triggered by the attack of pathogens. After recognizing the microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), plant cells become fortified against pathogen attacks by accumulating chemicals like terpenoids, phenolics, and alkaloids [45]. The accumulation of different phenolic compounds in fungus-infected leaves and fruits has been shown in previous studies [23, 46,47]. The findings of this study, with regard to higher accumulation of phenolic compounds and vitamin C in the symptomatic part (1/2 D) than in the asymptomatic (1/2 H) part of the same leaf, can be explained by the higher accumulation of phenolic compounds in the asymptomatic plant cells surrounding the wounded or infected cells. The defense compound produced in the damaged cells diffuse into the adjacent healthy cells. Hence, activities of many phenol-oxidizing enzymes in the adjacent healthy cells are stimulated [48,49]. It has also been reported that synthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds occurs between the circular leaf spot-affected tissue and the healthy tissue [23,49]. Higher levels of phenolic compounds in the infected parts can play a role in the protection of plant health [49]. There was a positive correlation between phenolic compound accumulation and antioxidant activity (not shown here), which is consistent with the findings of Hossain et al. [34].

Another important finding of this study is higher AUDPC for older leaves than younger leaves (Fig 5). Higher AUDPC means the more disease severity in old leaves. The disease progression was much faster and severe in leaves emerged in May compared with those emerged in June in both years. (Fig 5). Both disease intensity and severity were higher in the older leaves than in the younger leaves. The findings under field conditions were complemented by those under experimental conditions (Fig 6). According to the findings of this study, the effect of phenolic compounds and vitamin C on CLSP development is substantial. Higher content of pre-formed phenolic compounds in the younger leaves (H1) may contribute to the basal resistance of persimmon against circular leaf spot. High phenolic compound levels in plants may inhibit pathogen attachment, invasion, and infection [48, 50]. There are contradicting reports regarding the influence of environmental conditions on the infection process of P. nawae. On one hand, although the effect of specific temperature and moisture level have not been determined, a film of water and appropriate temperature have been reported to be required for infection development [1]. The question regarding the effect of different inoculum loads on leaves emerged in May in June may be explained by the findings of studies related to disease outbreak and inoculum dynamic of CLSP. In Korea, maximum number of ascospores detected from mid-June to mid-July [7]. No significant difference between infection rate of plants in May and plants in June [1]. In Spain, relatively low inoculum load in June were able to induce severe symptoms on trap plants [2]. Hence, the effect of different inoculum load may not be the critical factor for inducing severe symptoms.

Based on the results of this study, it can be hypothesized that phenolic compounds and vitamin C may be associated with the long quiescent period observed for P. nawae. In Korea, persimmon is generally exposed to the inoculum (ascospores) of P. nawae from May, but symptoms appear at the end of August or in early September [7,51]. A tentative relationship between leaf phenolic compound (flavonoids) content and P. nawae infection is shown in Fig 7.

Fig 7. Hypothetical relationship between P. nawae infection and flavonoid content of persimmon.

Fig 7

The trend line for ascospore dynamics is adopted from Hassan et al. [7]. The trend line for flavonoid content in persimmon leaf extracts is acquired from Jung and Jeong [33].

From May to mid-July, flavonoid content in the leaves is very high and maximum airborne ascospores are detected. During this period, higher levels of pre-formed flavonoids in leaves may resist P. nawae infection. If the spores are able to infect the leaves, they may survive as endophytes. The distinct association of P. nawae with plants in forms other than as pathogens, such as endophytes and opportunistic pathogens, have been reported by some studies [4,52]. When persimmon leaves contain lower flavonoid content from the end of July to early August, P. nawae infect leaves and cause disease. Pre-existing association of P. nawae as an endophyte or as an opportunistic pathogen may be converted to a pathogenic association to cause the disease. After a short period, disease appears during August or early September. During the infection period, flavonoid content in persimmon leaves increases and induces the post-inflectional resistance to protect the healthy tissues of the plant. The relationship between phenolic compounds (flavonoids) and P. nawae infection was not validated with concrete evidence. A further study is needed for validating the proposed tentative relationship between phenolic compound content in leaves and P. nawae infection.

Conclusion

One of the key and fascinating features of circular leaf spot is its long incubation period. Very little is known about the factors driving symptom expression in this disease. This study was on the biochemical factors influencing ontogenic susceptibility of persimmon leaves to circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae (Mycosphaerella nawae). Phenolic compounds and antioxidants were quantified in persimmon leaves in May and later in September in an affected orchard. Higher levels of these biochemical compounds were found in asymptomatic leaves in May (young leaves) than in asymptomatic leaves in September (old leaves). Symptomatic leaves in September had higher levels than asymptomatic leaves in September. Field observations in infected orchards showed that the disease progression was much faster and severe in leaves emerged in May compared with those emerged in June. It was confirmed by the experiment under control condition. The constitutive and induce phenolic compounds and vitamin C may explain the broad and unspecified prevention of plant diseases such as CLSP.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Secondary compounds obvs.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are very indebted to our lab mates who help during the period of study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by a grant from the Cooperative Research Program for Correspondence Competitiveness Improvement Technology Development (Project No. PJ01169703) of the Rural Development Administration, Korea. No authors received a salary from the funder.

References

  • 1.Kwon JH, and Park CS. Ecology of disease outbreak of circular leaf spot of persimmon and inoculum dynamics of Mycosphaerella nawae. Res. Plant Dis. 2004;10: 209–216. (In Korean, abstract in English). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vicent A, Bassimba DDM, Hinarejos C, Mira JL. Inoculum and disease dynamics of circular leaf spot of persimmon caused by Mycosphaerella nawae under semi-arid conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012;134: 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bassimba DDM, Mira JL, Sedano ME, Vicent A. Control and yield loss modelling of circular leaf spot of persimmon caused by Mycosphaerella nawae. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2017; 170:391–404. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hassan O, Chang T. Phylogenetic and morphological reassessment of Mycosphaerella nawae, the causal agent of circular leaf spot in persimmon. Plant dis. 2019;103: 200–213. 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0857-RE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ikata S, Hitomi T. Studies on circular leaf spot of persimmon caused by Mycosphaerella nawae. Spec. Bull. Okayama Pre. Agric. Exp. Stn. 1929; 33: 1–36 (In Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kwon JH, Kang SW, Park CS, Kim HK. Identification of the imperfect stage of Mycosphaerella nawae causing circular leaf spot of persimmon in Korea. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 1998; 14:397–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hassan O, Shin JS, Oh NK, Chang T. Inoculum dynamics and disease progress of circular leaf spot of persimmon caused by Mycosphaerella nawae in inland Korea. J. Plant Pathol. 2018;100: 543–553. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kwon JH, Kang SW, Park CS, Kim HK. Further evidence that Ramularia-type conidia in vivo plays a role as a secondary inoculum of Mycosphaerella nawae. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 1998; 14:393–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balasundram N, Sundram K, Samman S. Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem. 2006; 99: 191–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schijlen EG, Ric de Vos CH, van Tunen AJ, Bovy AG. Modification of flavonoid biosynthesis in crop plants. Phytochemistry. 2004; 65: 2631–2648. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin D, Xiao M, Zhao J, Li Z, Xing B, Li X. et al. An overview of plant phenolic compounds and their importance in human nutrition and management of type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2016; 21: E1374 10.3390/molecules21101374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bhattacharya A, Sood P, Citovsky V. The roles of plant phenolics in defence and communication during Agrobacterium and Rhizobium infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010; 11:705–719. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00625.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kulbat K. The role of phenolic compounds in plant resistance. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016; 80:97–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aver’yanov AA, Lapikova VP. Participation of active forms of oxygen in the mechanism of ferulic acid toxicity. Biol. Bull. 1985; 4:352–357. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oszmiański J, Kolniak-Ostek J, Biernat A. The content of phenolic compounds in leaf tissues of Aesculus glabra and Aesculus parviflora Walt. Molecules. 2015; 20: 2176–2189. 10.3390/molecules20022176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Martini S.,D’Addario C, Colacevich A, Focardi S, Borghini F, Santucci A, et al. Antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori strains and antioxidant properties of blackberry leaves (Rubus ulmifolius) and isolated compounds. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2009; 34: 50–9. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mikulic‐Petkovsek M, Schmitzer V, Stampar F, Veberic R, Koron D. Changes in phenolic content induced by infection with Didymella applanata and Leptosphaeria coniothyrium, the causal agents of raspberry spur and cane blight. Plant Pathol. 2014; 63: 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matsuo T, Ito S. The chemical structure of kaki-tannin from immature fruit of the persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.). Agric. Biol. Chem. 1978;42: 1637–1643. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jo C, Son JH, Shin MG, and Byun MW. Irradiation effects on color and functional properties of persimmon (Diospyros kaki L. folium) leaf extract and licorice (Glycyrrhiza Uralensis Fischer) root extract during storage. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2003. 67: 143–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hossain A, Moon HK, Kim JK. Antioxidant properties of Korean major persimmon (Diospyros kaki) leaves. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018; 27: 177–184. 10.1007/s10068-017-0195-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Elio GWM, Schijlen C H, de Vos R, van Tunen AJ, Bovy AG. Modification of flavonoid biosynthesis in crop plants. Phytochemistry. 2004; 65: 2631–2648. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pereira DM, Valentão P, Pereira JA, Andrade PB. Phenolics: from chemistry to biology. Molecules. 2009; 14: 2202–2211. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mikulic Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R. Phenolic compounds in apple leaves after infection with apple scab. Biol. Plantarum. 2011; 55: 725–730. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Arici E, Kafkas E, Kaymak S, Koc NK. Phenolic compounds of apple cultivars resistant or susceptible to Venturia inaequalis, Pharm. Biol. 2014; 52: 904–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arun K, Mali PC, Manga VK. Changes of some phenolic compounds and enzyme activities on infected pearl millet caused by Sclerospora graminicola. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010; 2: 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shilpashree K, Patil MS, Uma MS. Estimation of total phenols and peroxidase isozyme in plants infected with blackeye cowpea mosaic disease. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 2013; 26: 318–319. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Islam FMA, Rengifo J, Redden RJ, Basford KE, Beebe SE. Association between seed coat polyphenolics (Tannins) and disease resistance in common bean. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2003; 58: 285–297. 10.1023/b:qual.0000040283.51023.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barbehenn RV, Constabel CP. Tannins in plant-herbivore interactions. Phytochemistry. 2011; 72: 1551–1565. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Somers TC, Harrison AF. Wood tannins—isolation and significance in host resistance to Verticillium wilt disease. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1967; 20: 475–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boubakri H, Gargouri M, Mliki A, Brini F, Chong J, Jbara M. Vitamins for enhancing plant resistance. Planta. 2016; 244: 529–543. 10.1007/s00425-016-2552-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boubakri H. The role of ascorbic acid in plant–pathogen interactions In: Hossain M., Munné-Bosch S., Burritt D., Diaz-Vivancos P., Fujita M., Lorence A. (eds) ascorbic acid in plant growth, development and stress tolerance. Springer, Cham: 2017; 255–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jeong S-I, Cho J-K, Mok JY, Kim S-J, Park J-M, Jeon I-H, et al. Antioxidant activity of persimmon leaves during growth. Korean J. Pharmacogn. 2010; 41: 255–263. (Korean abstract in English). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jung WY, Jeong JM. Change of antioxidative activity at different harvest time and improvement of atopic dermatitis effects for persimmon leaf extract. Korean J. Herbol. 2012; 7:41–49. (Korean abstract in English). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hossain A, Moon HK, Kim JK. Effect of pretreatment and extraction conditions on the antioxidant properties of persimmon (Diospyros kaki) leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2017; 81: 2079–2085. 10.1080/09168451.2017.1378088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic- phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1965;16: 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999; 64: 555–559. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Broadhurst RB, Jones WT. Analysis of condensed tannins using acidified vanillin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1978; 29: 788–794. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu BJ, Chang SKC. A comparative study on phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of legumes as affected by extraction solvents. J. Food Sci. 2007; 72: 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shahidi F, Liyana-Pathirana CM, Wall DS. Antioxidant activity of white and black sesame seeds and their hull fractions. Food Chem. 2006; 99:478–483. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Thaipong K, Boonprakob U, Crosby K, Cisneros-Zevallos L, Byrne DH. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006; 19:669–675. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Khan R, Rahman MM, Islam MS, Begum SA. A Simple UV-spectrophotometric method for the determination of vitamin C content in various fruits and vegetables at Sylhet area in Bangladesh. J. Biol. Sci. 2006; 6: 388–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Townsend GR, Heuberger JW. Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicide experi ments. Plant Dis. Rep. 1943; 27: 340–343. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2016. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
  • 44.Madden LV, Hughes G, van den Bosch F. 2007. The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN: 2017. Available at: 10.1094/9780890545058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Freeman BC, Beattie GA. An overview of plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Plant Pathology and Microbiology Publications. 2008; 94 https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/plantpath_pubs/94. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Treutter D, Feucht W. The pattern of flavan-3-ols in relation to scab resistance of apple cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 1990; 65: 511–517. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Treutter D, Feucht W. Accumulation of flavan-3-ols in fungus-infected leaves of Rosaceae. J. Plant Dis.Protect.1990; 97: 634–641. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Agrios NG. How plants defend themselves against pathogens In: Plant pathology. 5th ed. Diego San: Academic Press; 2005; p. 93–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mikulic Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R. Accumulation of phenolic compounds in apple in response to infection by the scab pathogen, Venturia inaequalis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009; 74: 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Matern U, Kneusal RE. Phenolic compounds in plant disease resistance. Phytopathology. 1988; 16: 153–170. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kwon JH, Kang SW, Chung BK, Park CS. Environmental factors affecting ascospore release of Mycosphaerella nawae, the causal organism of the spotted leaf casting of persimmon. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 1995; 11: 344–347. (In Korean, abstract in English). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang L-W, Wang J-L, Chen J, Chen J-J, Shen J-W, Feng X-X, et al. A novel derivative of (-) mycousnine produced by the endophytic fungus Mycosphaerella nawae, exhibits high and selective immunosuppressive activity on T Cells. Front. Microbiol. 2017; 8:1251 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Branislav T Šiler

10 Feb 2020

PONE-D-20-01059

Changes in the secondary compounds of persimmon leaves as a defense against circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The main drawback of the experimental design are the analytical methods. Authors are addressed to carefully consider concerns of Reviewer #1.

==============================

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 26 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This study was supported by a grant from the Cooperative Research Program for Correspondence Competitiveness Improvement Technology Development (Project No. PJ01169703) of the Rural Development Administration, Korea."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript"

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the article, there is described a holistic response of persimmon leaves on the infection of P. nawae. The experiment is well designed but I have some doubts about analyzes of metabolites. In line 111 cited is a method that is not listed in the references. The drying and blanching at 100 °C could influence the content of phenolics and especially ascorbic acid. Furthermore, vitamin C includes L-ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid, not only ascorbic acid. And a temperature range of 30 to 60 degrees C could result in the conversion of L-ascorbic acid to dehydroascorbic (DHAA), a very important reaction in regard to vitamin C degradation because DHAA could be easily converted to other compounds that do not have the biological activity of vitamin C (Munyaka et al., 2010, J Food Sci.; Herbig and Renard, 2017, Food Chem.).

When the units are mg/g we do not use the term “concentration” but “content”. The term “concentration” is used when the amount is present in volume.

Vitamin C - unifrom the writting

Line 105: define more specific when infected leaves were collected

Line 129: referencing is not appropriate

Line 130: a comma is missing

Line 157: why for Acontrol the DPPH solution was used and not blank (sample replaced by water+MeOH)?

Line 175: … filtered using Bucher. Explain more precisely what it is Bucher.

Line 206: what is meaning “r. AUDPC” ?

Line 318: What did you mean with “phenols” in the statement: “… phenolic compounds (phenols, phenolic acids, flavonoids, …)?

Line 332: referencing is not appropriate

References have to be checked detailed. Many of them are not correct used in the text. In the part References some are missing (Hossain et al., 2017), some are written twice (Mikulic-Petkovsek et al., 2011)…

Reviewer #2: In December 2018 I reviewed this same manuscript for the journal Plant Disease. Below you can find my two review reports. In this new version submitted to PlosOne the authors have included an additional experiment, which addresses my main concern at that time "To assure that the differences observed were in fact due to leaf age, potted plants with different leaf ages (pruning and/or cold storage may assist for this) should be inoculated at the same time and with the same inoculum concentration". I think now the paper can be accepted for publication.

-First review Plant Disease

In their manuscript, Hassan et al. presented a study on the biochemical factors influencing ontogenic susceptibility of persimmon leaves to circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae (Mycosphaerella nawae). Phenolic compounds and antioxidants were quantified in persimmon leaves in May and later in September in an affected orchard. Higher levels of these biochemical compounds were found in asymptomatic leaves in May than in asymptomatic leaves in September. Symptomatic leaves in September had higher levels than asymptomatic leaves in September. Field observations in infected orchards showed that the disease progression was much faster and severe in leaves emerged in May compared with those emerged in June. Laboratory inoculations suggested a negative relationship between leaf age and the duration of the incubation period. One of the key and fascinating features of circular leaf spot is its long incubation period. Very little is known about the factors driving symptom expression in this disease and thus this study is considered original and deserves consideration. However, serious limitations in the experimental design used were detected and the conclusions were considered highly speculative based on current evidence. Authors refer to healthy and diseased leaves, but studies were conducted in severely infested orchards, so is better they refer to asymptomatic and symptomatic leaves. The disease was more severe and progressed faster in leaves emerged in May compared with those emerged in June. The authors assume this is due to leaf age, with old leaves (emerged in May) being more susceptible. However, leaves emerged in May were indeed exposed to a much higher inoculum load and more infection events than those emerged in June, which escaped part of the infection period. Moreover, the conclusion than young leaves are less susceptible or even resistant to circular leaf spot contradicts current evidence. In Korea, trap plants with young leaves were exposed to field infections and developed severe symptoms of circular leaf spot (Kang et al. 1993 RDA J. Agric. Sci. 35:337-343; Kwon and Park 2004. Res. Plant Dis. 10:209-216). Studies with trap plants also indicated that, regardless of the period of infection, symptoms expression is somehow synchronized. Laboratory inoculations would certainly help to clarify this, but the experiment included in this manuscript is not convincing. Mycosphaerella nawae does not form ascospores in vitro and conidia are only sparsely produced. Authors have to describe and substantiate much better how they got the spore suspensions for inoculations. Also, how previous infections were not interfering with this experiment since leaves were collected from infested orchards. The use of living plants instead of detached leaves may be also better in this context. Methodologies such as GFP-transformed isolates would probably be necessary to dilucidate the incubation period of this interesting pathogen. In the view of this reviewer, the manuscript is not acceptable for publication in its present form. Nevertheless, resubmission is encouraged whether additional evidences will be compiled. More comments and suggestions are included in the attached pdf.

-Second review Plant Disease

The authors have clarified some issues and improved terminology through the text. Experimental details that were lacking in the previous version (e.g. orchard characteristics and inoculation method) are now included in the revised manuscript. Nevertheless, instead of providing additional evidences, the authors basically refuted the main criticisms highlighted by this reviewer. In the field experiments, the factors leaf age and exposure to inoculum were clearly confounded. To assure that the differences observed were in fact due to leaf age, potted plants with different leaf ages (pruning and/or cold storage may assist for this) should be inoculated at the same time and with the same inoculum concentration. In the laboratory experiments, I am still of the opinion that inoculations should be conducted using living plants instead of detached leaves, particularly when biochemical compounds will be quantified. In the revised manuscript, the authors indicated that detached leaves used for artificial inoculation were collected from an orchard previously treated with fungicides, which is a bit surprising. As noted in my previous review, I think the manuscript addresses a very interesting topic, but additional evidences are needed to support the conclusions drawn.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 6;15(3):e0230286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230286.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 Feb 2020

Dear reviewers

Thank you very much for your query and suggestions.

We tried to address all the concerns of you.

The response of all point raised by reviewer 1 is given in attached file.

Thank you for your time.

Your best regard

Chang

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Branislav T Šiler

13 Feb 2020

PONE-D-20-01059R1

Changes in the secondary compounds of persimmon leaves as a defense against circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

In the previous review round, authors were addressed to meticulously check and revise the manuscript according to reviewers' comments. Reviewer #1 have raised major concerns about the methodology used, particularly related to the plant material handling and temperature-dependent degradation of L-ascorbic acid. More thorough discussion both in the main text and in "response to reviewers" were expected. The claims stated in the response to the reviewer's concerns have to be supported by a steady literature survey, whether the authors agree with the comments or provide a rebuttal.

There is no need to capitalize the term "vitamin".

Wrong figure legend provided for Figure 5 in the Figure legends list.

L143: no need to state the full compound name in the subtitle.

A brief conclusion part should be provided.

==============================

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 29 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 6;15(3):e0230286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230286.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


13 Feb 2020

Dear Editor

Thank you very much for your query and suggestions.

We tried to address all the concerns of you.

Your best regard

Chang

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Branislav T Šiler

26 Feb 2020

Changes in the secondary compounds of persimmon leaves as a defense against circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae

PONE-D-20-01059R2

Dear Dr. Chang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Branislav T. Šiler, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Branislav T Šiler

28 Feb 2020

PONE-D-20-01059R2

Changes in the secondary compounds of persimmon leaves as a defense against circular leaf spot caused by Plurivorosphaerella nawae

Dear Dr. Chang:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Branislav T. Šiler

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Secondary compounds obvs.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES