Abstract
Purpose
We identified the associations between levels of aqueous glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and systemic or ocular factors in patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (CIDME).
Methods
We measured the aqueous concentrations of GRP78, interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-17, placental growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We explored the associations between aqueous GRP78 levels and those of other aqueous factors, optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and systemic parameters in CIDME patients.
Results
In multivariate regression analysis, aqueous GRP78 levels were associated with aqueous VEGF levels (p = 0.007), length of EZ disruption (p = 0.007), length of EZ disruption (p = 0.007), length of EZ disruption (p = 0.007), length of EZ disruption (
Conclusions
Aqueous GRP78 levels correlated with VEGF levels in the aqueous humor and EZ disruption on OCT. However, GRP78 levels were not associated with those of inflammatory biomarkers in the aqueous humor or OCT findings. Additionally, GRP78 could not serve as a biomarker to predict short-term prognosis of anti-VEGF agent.
1. Introduction
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exhibits several metabolic and biosynthetic functions. During protein synthesis, unfolded and misfolded proteins can accumulate in the ER; ER stress is defined as abnormally excessive accumulation of these proteins in the organelle under pathological conditions [1]. As the unfolded protein response is then initiated, the chaperone proteins are activated to complete protein folding or to disassemble abnormal proteins [2, 3]. If there is no proper chaperone activity, ER stress may trigger apoptosis or autophagy [4, 5]. Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a representative ER chaperone, has served as ER stress marker [6, 7]. GRP78 facilitates appropriate protein processing, degrades misfolded proteins, ensures calcium homeostasis, and activates transmembrane ER stress sensor proteins [8–10]. Inflammation and ischemia are the most common pathological conditions that trigger ER stress [11, 12]. Many reports have shown that ER stress is associated with diabetes [13–15]. Additionally, the early pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME) usually involves damage to the inner blood-retinal barrier caused by hypoxia and inflammation [16]. However, few studies have explored the relationship between DME and ER stress [17]. Thus, we designed this study to identify the factors that affect their relationship by exploring GRP78 levels in the aqueous humor of DME patients.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Subjects
We assessed the association of GRP78 levels, measured in the aqueous humor, with levels of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-17; placental growth factor (PlGF); and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), as well as with the optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of center-involving DME (CIDME) with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) [18, 19]. This prospective study adhered to all relevant tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the institutional review ethics board of the Catholic University of Korea. All participants provided written informed consent for use of their clinical records.
We enrolled treatment-naïve CIDME eyes of central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 300 μm from 2016 to 2018 [18, 19]. The exclusion criteria included macular edema attributable to other causes. We also excluded eyes with concurrent ocular conditions such as glaucoma, high myopia with axial length ≥ 25.5 mm, and retinal vascular occlusion and eyes with histories of prior ocular conditions including uveitis and intraocular surgery or laser that could influence enzyme levels in the aqueous humor. We measured glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in all patients and performed complete ophthalmic examinations, including measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus examination, and fluorescein angiography (FAG) to classify the eyes according to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study as mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), moderate and severe NPDR, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). We also assessed CST and macular morphology via OCT (Cirrus High-Definition OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), and the axial length was measured using an IOL Master instrument (Carl Zeiss Meditec). We used a horizontal B-scan OCT image centered on the fovea for measuring hyperreflective foci (HF) and total length of ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption within the central 3000 μm around the fovea [20, 21]. We evaluated changes in CST at the 1-month visit after three consecutive monthly intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections. Responsiveness was defined as CST < 300 μm after these treatments.
2.2. Quantitation of GRP78 in the Aqueous Humor
GRP78 protein levels were determined in 1 : 1 diluted aqueous humor samples using a human GRP78 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Lausen, Switzerland) with a detection range of 1.4 to 4500 ng/mL according to the manufacturer's instructions. All values under the lower limit of detection were considered zero values.
2.3. Assay of Cytokines and Growth Factors
We assayed IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, PlGF, and VEGF levels in the aqueous humor from the anterior chamber using bead-immobilized human antibodies against these materials; 75 μL humor samples and 75 μL amounts of calibrator diluent RD6-52 were added to the beads, incubated for 2 h at room temperature (20–25°C), and then for a further 1 h at room temperature after the addition of detection antibodies, and for a final 30 min at room temperature after the addition of the streptavidin-phycoerythrin reagent. A Luminex xMAP suspension array system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) was used for detection; this is a multiplexed microsphere suspension immunoassay that detects and quantitates spectrally unique microspheres attached to specific antibodies. The detection limits and dynamic ranges are as follows: 0.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 3950 pg/mL for IL-1β, 1.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 1140 pg/mL for IL-8, 1.6 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 890 pg/mL for IL-10, 1.8 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 2090 pg/mL for IL-17, 1.9 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 470 pg/mL for PlGF, and 2.1 pg/mL with a dynamic range to 2170 pg/mL for VEGF. All values under the lower limit of detection were considered zero values [22, 23].
2.4. Statistical Analyses
We performed between-group comparisons using Student's t-test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi-squared test. Linear regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with GRP78 levels, and Spearman's rank correlation was used for univariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows software (ver. 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R software (ver. 3.2.3; R Development Core Team, 2015).
3. Results
We enrolled 66 treatment-naïve CIDME eyes of 66 patients with a mean age of 56.70 ± 8.07 years; there were 28 males and 38 females. Forty-nine (74.24%) patients had proliferative DR and 17 (25.76%) had nonproliferative DR. The mean BCVA (logMAR) was 0.49 ± 0.24, and the mean CST was 414.53 ± 79.44 μm at baseline. In the classification by DME morphology based on the OCT, 30 patients had cystoid macular edema and 36 had diffuse retinal thickening (Table 1).
Table 1.
N = 66 | ||
---|---|---|
Systemic factors | Sex (male : female) | 28 : 38 |
Age (years) | 56.70 ± 8.07 | |
HbA1C (%) | 7.59 ± 0.94 | |
Duration of DM (years) | 13.00 [7.00; 18.00] | |
| ||
OCT findings | Number of HF | 8.00 [6.00; 13.00] |
Subretinal fluid | 12 (18.18%) | |
CME : DRT | 30 : 36 | |
EZ disruption | ||
(-) | 42 (63.64%) | |
(+) | 24 (36.36%) | |
| ||
Aqueous humor components | GRP78 (ng/mL) | 4.05 [2.64; 5.22] |
IL-1β (pg/mL) | 3.49 [1.86; 3.49] | |
IL-8 (pg/mL) | 18.84 [11.62; 28.49] | |
IL-10 (pg/mL) | 0.00 [0.00; 0.00] | |
IL-17 (pg/mL) | 2.56 [0.00; 2.76] | |
PlGF (pg/mL) | 0.00 [0.00; 2.23] | |
VEGF (pg/mL) | 65.22 [31.65; 95.58] | |
| ||
Ocular factors | Baseline BCVA (logMAR) | 0.50 [0.40; 0.70] |
Baseline CST (μm) | 391.00 [363.00; 457.00] | |
DMR (NPDR : PDR) | 17 : 49 |
Values are expressed as means ± SDs or as medians with interquartile ranges, as appropriate. HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; OCT: optical coherence tomography; HF: hyperreflective foci; CME: cystoid macular edema; DRT: diffuse retinal thickening; EZ: ellipsoid zone; GRP78: glucose-regulated protein of 78 kDa; IL: interleukin; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; CST: central subfield thickness; DMR: DM retinopathy; NPDR: nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR: proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
In univariate regression analysis, GRP78 levels in the aqueous humor were associated with aqueous VEGF levels (p = 0.032), length of EZ disruption (p < 0.001), and number of HF (p = 0.006). In multivariate regression analysis, GRP78 levels in the aqueous humor were associated with aqueous VEGF levels (p = 0.007), length of EZ disruption (p < 0.001), and duration of diabetes (p = 0.002) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Univariate∗ | Stepwise backward∗† | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
B ± SE | p value | B ± SE | p value | ||
Systemic factors | HbA1c (%) | 0.58 ± 0.36 | 0.112 | ||
Duration of diabetes (years) | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 0.107 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.002 | |
| |||||
OCT findings | Preoperative CST (μm) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.828 | ||
Length of EZ disruption (μm) | 0.01 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | <0.001 | |
Number of HF | 0.18 ± 0.06 | 0.006 | 0.11 ± 0.06 | 0.059 | |
| |||||
Aqueous humor components | IL-1β level (pg/mL) | −0.04 ± 0.21 | 0.855 | ||
IL-8 level (pg/mL) | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.3584 | |||
IL-10 level (pg/mL) | −0.03 ± 0.54 | 0.953 | |||
IL-17 level (pg/mL) | 0.19 ± 0.18 | 0.277 | |||
PlGF level (pg/mL) | 0.04 ± 0.12 | 0.738 | |||
VEGF level (pg/mL) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.032 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.007 |
B: estimated regression coefficient; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; OCT: optical coherence tomography; CST: central subfield thickness; EZ: ellipsoid zone; HF: hyperreflective foci; IL: interleukin; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor. ∗Adjusted for age, sex, and diabetic retinopathy stage. †Adjusted R2 = 0.439.
Of the 66 ME patients, 23 (34.85%) exhibited CST < 300 μm 1 month after the last IVB injection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HF ≥ 8 on OCT finding was the only factor associated with responsiveness (OR = 0.34, p = 0.046), but aqueous GRP78 was not associated with the responsiveness (Table 3).
Table 3.
Category | n (%) | Univariate | Multivariate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |||
Sex | Female | 38 (57.58%) | Reference | |||
Male | 28 (42.42%) | 0.61 (0.21, 1.72) | 0.360 | |||
| ||||||
Age (years) | <60 | 30 (45.45%) | Reference | |||
≥60 | 36 (54.55%) | 0.84 (0.33, 1.27) | 0.558 | |||
| ||||||
HbA1c | ≤7 | 18 (%) | Reference | |||
>7 | 48 (%) | 1.56 (0.50, 5.52) | 0.462 | |||
| ||||||
DMR stage | NPDR | 17 (27.27%) | Reference | |||
PDR | 49 (72.73%) | 0.69 (0.22, 2.22) | 0.526 | |||
| ||||||
EZ disruption | (-) | 42 (63.64%) | Reference | |||
(+) | 24 (36.36%) | 0.67 (0.22, 1.93) | 0.465 | |||
| ||||||
Number of HF | <8 | 29 (43.94%) | Reference | Reference | ||
≥8 | 37 (56.06%) | 0.34 (0.12, 0.96) | 0.046 | 0.34 (0.12, 0.96) | 0.046 | |
| ||||||
GRP78 (ng/mL) | >4.051 | 33 (50.00%) | Reference | |||
<4.051 | 33 (50.00%) | 0.88 (0.31, 2.42) | 0.796 |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; DMR: DM retinopathy; EZ: ellipsoid zone; HF: hyperreflective foci; GRP78: glucose-regulated protein of 78 kDa.
4. Discussion
GRP78 plays multiple roles in the ER, serving mainly as a chaperone [8, 9]. All chaperones have a lysine-aspartate-glutamate-leucine (KDEL) ER retention signal [24]. Under excessive stress on the ER, the KDEL receptor expression cannot be coordinately upregulated, and as a result, KDEL receptors become saturated [25]. GRP78 can escape from the ER and appear on the cell surface or be out of the cell [26]. Surface GRP78 mediates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and immune activity [27, 28]. On the other hand, the action of secreted form of GRP78 is not as well-known as those of the other forms. As diabetic retinopathy develops under ER stress conditions [29–31], we explored the association between secreted GRP78 levels in the aqueous humor and DME development and found that GRP78 levels were associated with those of aqueous VEGF and may reflect retinal status.
As ER stress develops during ischemia or inflammation, DME is also associated with these conditions. The mainstay of DME treatment is injection of intravitreal anti-VEGF or steroid; an agent is selected by reference to prior responsiveness to that agent or as suggested by FAG or OCT [32, 33]. Several studies have sought biomarkers that predict treatment responsiveness and prognosis [34, 35]. Previously, we had reported that the aqueous GRP78 levels had a correlation with VEGF levels in the aqueous humor, but the report had limitation; it could not analyze the association between aqueous GRP78 levels and inflammation [17]. In this study, aqueous GRP78 levels showed no significant correlations with proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory biomarkers in the aqueous humor.
We aimed to determine the mechanism involved in DME associated with ER stress and whether GRP78 could serve as a useful biomarker.
On multivariate regression analysis, aqueous GRP78 levels were significantly correlated with EZ disruption grades but not with HF numbers on OCT. Previously, HF were suspected as subclinical features of lipoprotein extravasation or migrating pieces of retinal pigmented epithelium [36, 37]. However, recent reports suggested that HF can be activated forms of microglia and markers of inflammation [38, 39]. On the other hand, EZ integrity reflects the health of the photoreceptor layer; EZ disruption is associated with a poor visual prognosis in DME patients [40]. Some studies have already shown that EZ disruption may also be associated with ischemia. One reported foveal ischemia in DME causes EZ disruption resulting in outer retinal layer changes [41], and another study suggested that macular ischemia in diabetes may be associated with photoreceptor compromise and ischemia at the deep capillary plexus may play an important role in these outer retinal changes [41]. Our OCT findings may indicate that GRP78 levels reflect retinal ischemic status.
There have been some studies demonstrating associations of HF in DME and anti-VEGF responsiveness. Similar to our results, they have reported that higher number of HF could be a poor prognostic factor result in worse BCVA or less CST reduction after anti-VEGF treatments in DME patients [42, 43]. Recent study reported that intravitreal dexamethasone implant treatment was superior to anti-VEGF agents in DME with serous retinal detachment and HF [44].
To sum up, aqueous VEGF levels and EZ disruption on OCT were associated with aqueous GRP78 levels, but the levels of inflammatory markers of the various IL families in the aqueous humor and HF as inflammatory biomarkers in OCT were not. Considering these results together, the data indicate that GRP78 levels seem to be more closely associated with ischemia than with inflammation.
This study had certain limitations. First, the sample size and volume were too small to explore how GRP78 levels affect functional and anatomical parameters, and aqueous volume was not enough for duplication in the ELISA analysis. Second, any interaction between GRP78 and VEGF remains unclear. Although some studies have reported that GRP78 levels correlated both with the extent of neovascularization and elevated VEGF levels [45–47], the role of GRP78 in DME pathogenesis cannot be definitively proven by their detection in aqueous samples. Third, when exploring retinal ischemia, OCT angiography would have been helpful. Despite these limitations, this is the first study to show that aqueous GRP78 levels correlate with both VEGF levels in the aqueous humor and EZ disruption revealed by OCT, implying that GRP78 levels may reflect retinal ischemic status in DME patients. Future studies should explore the role and origin of this ER chaperone in DME.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Catholic Medical Center Research Foundation made in the program year of 2019.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Disclosure
This paper was presented in the RANZCO 2019 Congress Poster Program.
Conflicts of Interest
No author has a financial and proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
References
- 1.Rutkowski D. T., Kaufman R. J. A trip to the ER: coping with stress. Trends in Cell Biology. 2004;14(1):20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldberg A. L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature. 2003;426(6968):895–899. doi: 10.1038/nature02263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ma Y., Hendershot L. M. ER chaperone functions during normal and stress conditions. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2004;28(1-2):51–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2003.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Puthalakath H., O'Reilly L. A., Gunn P., et al. ER stress triggers apoptosis by activating BH3-only protein Bim. Cell. 2007;129(7):1337–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ogata M., Hino S.-i., Saito A., et al. Autophagy is activated for cell survival after endoplasmic reticulum stress. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2006;26(24):9220–9231. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01453-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Luk J. M., Lam C. T., Siu A. F., et al. Proteomic profiling of hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese cohort reveals heat-shock proteins (Hsp27, Hsp70, GRP78) up-regulation and their associated prognostic values. Proteomics. 2006;6(3):1049–1057. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matsuo K., Gray M. J., Yang D. Y., et al. The endoplasmic reticulum stress marker, glucose-regulated protein-78 (GRP78) in visceral adipocytes predicts endometrial cancer progression and patient survival. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013;128(3):552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ouyang Y.-B., Xu L.-J., Emery J. F., Lee A. S., Giffard R. G. Overexpressing GRP78 influences Ca2+ handling and function of mitochondria in astrocytes after ischemia-like stress. Mitochondrion. 2011;11(2):279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2010.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hendershot L. M. The ER function BiP is a master regulator of ER function. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine. 2004;71(5):289–297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu G., Lee A. S. Role of the unfolded protein response, GRP78 and GRP94 in organ homeostasis. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2015;230(7):1413–1420. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Logue S. E., Cleary P., Saveljeva S., Samali A. New directions in ER stress-induced cell death. Apoptosis. 2013;18(5):537–546. doi: 10.1007/s10495-013-0818-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Raciti M., Lotti L. V., Valia S., Pulcinelli F. M., Di Renzo L. JNK2 is activated during ER stress and promotes cell survival. Cell Death & Disease. 2012;3(11, article e429) doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Özcan U., Cao Q., Yilmaz E., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress links obesity, insulin action, and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2004;306(5695):457–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1103160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Özcan U., Yilmaz E., Özcan L., et al. Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Science. 2006;313(5790):1137–1140. doi: 10.1126/science.1128294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eizirik D. L., Cardozo A. K., Cnop M. The role for endoplasmic reticulum stress in diabetes mellitus. Endocrine Reviews. 2008;29(1):42–61. doi: 10.1210/er.2007-0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Semeraro F., Cancarini A., dell’Omo R., Rezzola S., Romano M. R., Costagliola C. Diabetic retinopathy: vascular and inflammatory disease. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2015;2015:16. doi: 10.1155/2015/582060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kwon J.-W., Jung I., Jee D. Glucose-regulated protein 78 in the aqueous humor in diabetic macular edema patients. Medicine. 2018;97(45, article e12757) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sadda S. R., Tan O., Walsh A. C., Schuman J. S., Varma R., Huang D. Automated detection of clinically significant macular edema by grid scanning optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1187.e1–1187.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Grover S., Murthy R. K., Brar V. S., Chalam K. V. Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(5):2644–2647. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kang J. W., Chung H., Chan Kim H. Correlation of optical coherence tomographic hyperreflective foci with visual outcomes in different patterns of diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2016;36(9):1630–1639. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schreur V., Altay L., van Asten F., et al. Hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography associate with treatment outcome for anti-VEGF in patients with diabetic macular edema. PloS One. 2018;13(10, article e0206482) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sato T., Takeuchi M., Karasawa Y., Takayama K., Enoki T. Comprehensive expression patterns of inflammatory cytokines in aqueous humor of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1, article 19447) doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55191-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takeuchi M., Sato T., Tanaka A., et al. Elevated levels of cytokines associated with Th2 and Th17 cells in vitreous fluid of proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients. PloS One. 2015;10(9, article e0137358) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Munro S., Pelham H. R. B. A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell. 1987;48(5):899–907. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Llewellyn D. H., Roderick H. L., Rose S. KDEL receptor expression is not coordinatedly up-regulated with ER stress-induced reticuloplasmin expression in HeLa cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1997;240(1):36–40. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ni M., Zhang Y., Lee A. S. Beyond the endoplasmic reticulum: atypical GRP78 in cell viability, signalling and therapeutic targeting. The Biochemical Journal. 2011;434(2):181–188. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Y., Liu R., Ni M., Gill P., Lee A. S. Cell surface relocalization of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone and unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(20):15065–15075. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.087445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Z., Zhang L., Zhao Y., et al. Cell-surface GRP78 facilitates colorectal cancer cell migration and invasion. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2013;45(5):987–994. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhong Y., Li J., Chen Y., Wang J. J., Ratan R., Zhang S. X. Activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress by hyperglycemia is essential for Müller cell-derived inflammatory cytokine production in diabetes. Diabetes. 2012;61(2):492–504. doi: 10.2337/db11-0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen Y., Wang J. J., Li J., et al. Activating transcription factor 4 mediates hyperglycaemia-induced endothelial inflammation and retinal vascular leakage through activation of STAT3 in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012;55(9):2533–2545. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2594-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang S. X., Ma J. H., Bhatta M., Fliesler S. J., Wang J. J. The unfolded protein response in retinal vascular diseases: implications and therapeutic potential beyond protein folding. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2015;45:111–131. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Veritti D., Sarao V., Galiazzo F., Lanzetta P. Early effects of dexamethasone implant on macular morphology and visual function in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmologica. 2017;238(1-2):100–105. doi: 10.1159/000475889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jeong Y.-C., Kim J.-W., Bae S.-H. Comparison of effects of IVTA and photocoagulation, depending on types of diabetic macular edema. Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society. 2007;48(5):655–664. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hillier R. J., Ojaimi E., Wong D. T., et al. Aqueous humor cytokine levels and anatomic response to intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2018;136(4):382–388. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kwon J.-w., Jee D. Aqueous humor cytokine levels in patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. PloS One. 2018;13(9, article e0203408) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Framme C., Wolf S., Wolf-Schnurrbusch U. Small dense particles in the retina observable by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(11):5965–5969. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bolz M., Schmidt-Erfurth U., Deak G., et al. Optical coherence tomographic hyperreflective foci: a morphologic sign of lipid extravasation in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(5):914–920. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Korot E., Comer G., Steffens T., Antonetti D. A. Algorithm for the measure of vitreous hyperreflective foci in optical coherence tomographic scans of patients with diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2016;134(1):15–20. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee H., Jang H., Choi Y. A., Kim H. C., Chung H. Association between soluble CD14 in the aqueous humor and hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2018;59(2):715–721. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Maheshwary A. S., Oster S. F., Yuson R. M. S., Cheng L., Mojana F., Freeman W. R. The Association Between Percent Disruption of the Photoreceptor Inner Segment- Outer Segment Junction and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;150(1):63–67.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee D.-H., Kim J. T., Jung D.-W., Joe S. G., Yoon Y. H. The relationship between foveal ischemia and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings in ischemic diabetic macular edema. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2013;54(2):1080–1085. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zur D., Iglicki M., Busch C., et al. OCT biomarkers as functional outcome predictors in diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone implant. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(2):267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chatziralli I. P., Sergentanis T. N., Sivaprasad S. Hyperreflective foci as an independent visual outcome predictor in macular edema due to retinal vascular diseases treated with intravitreal dexamethasone or ranibizumab. Retina. 2016;36(12):2319–2328. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ozsaygili C., Duru N. Comparison of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and aflibercept in patients with treatment-naive diabetic macular edema with serous retinal detachment. Retina. 2019:p. 1. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoo S. A., You S., Yoon H. J., et al. A novel pathogenic role of the ER chaperone GRP78/BiP in rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2012;209(4):871–886. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Roybal C. N., Marmorstein L. Y., Vander Jagt D. L., Abcouwer S. F. Aberrant accumulation of fibulin-3 in the endoplasmic reticulum leads to activation of the unfolded protein response and VEGF expression. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2005;46(11):3973–3979. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Matsui A., Kaneko H., Kachi S., et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by retinal pigment epithelial cells induced by amyloid-β is depressed by an endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibitor. Ophthalmic Research. 2015;55(1):37–44. doi: 10.1159/000440885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.