Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2019;20(11):3305–3309. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3305

P21 Ser31Arg and FGFR2 rs2981582 Polymorphisms as Risk Factors for Early Onset of Breast Cancer in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dewajani Purnomosari 1,*, Clarista Raharjo 2, Alvin Santoso Kalim 2, Rahma Herviastuti 2, Markus Yushan 2, Rangga Athilah Fajar 2, Karina Kazia Harris 2, Artanto Wahyono 3
PMCID: PMC7063001  PMID: 31759353

Abstract

Objectives:

Breast cancer tend to be more progressive with poorer prognosis in younger patients than those at an older age. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of P53 Pro72Arg, MDM2 SNP309, P21 Ser31Arg, ER SNP594, HER2 Ile655Val, and FGFR2 rs2981582 have drawn attention as genetic factors associated with cancer risk. However, there were contradictory results involving different races and their association is still unknown in Indonesian populations. This study was performed to examine the proportion of these six genes polymorphisms and their associations with age of onset of breast cancer patients in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Methods:

Biorepository DNA from 199 patients registered at Dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta from 2006-2013 were tested for polymorphisms using the PCR-RFLP method. Samples were taken from two age groups; early-onset (<40 years) and late-onset of breast cancer (>55 years). Chi-square tests with odds ratio were used for data analysis.

Results:

The mean age of the early-onset group was 36±4.2 years, while the late-onset group was 62±6.9 years. AA genotype and A allele of P21 and TT genotypes and T allele of FGFR2 were significantly more frequent and were associated with an increased risk of early-onset of breast cancer (95%CI: 2.54 and 1.59; 2.63 and 1.64, respectively).

Conclusions:

Our study indicates that the A allele of P21 and the allele T of FGFR2 may be associated with an increased risk of early-onset of breast cancer in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Further analysis is needed to confirm the findings.

Key Words: Age of onset, breast carcinoma, FGFR2, P21, single nucleotide polymorphism

Introduction

Globally, breast cancer (BC) ranks highest and is the most prevalent carcinoma among women in Indonesia, accounting for 48.998 new cases (30.5%) with 5 years prevalence of 171.005 (41.7%) (Ferlay, 2013). Early onset BC occurs in patients aged 40 years or younger and its incidence varies among races (Anders et al., 2009). Early onset ofBC tends to occur with hormone receptor negativity in larger and more aggressive, high grade tumors with hormone receptor negativity, and HER2 overexpression (Assi et al., 2013), with greater risk of contralateral breast cancer in 15 years (Metcalfe et al., 2011).

In the United States, only 6.8% of BC patients are below 40 years (Anders et al., 2009), whereas in Asia its incidence rate could reaches 9.5-11% (Han et al., 2004). Early onset cases in Dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta between the years 2012–2015 showed incidence rates ranging from 12.8 – 19.7% (unpublished data).

One of the major risk factors for early onset BC is a history of BC in the family, which involves inherited genetic mutations, in particular the major susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been shown to account for up to only 15% of familial early onset BC cases (Stratton and Rahman, 2008). One study in China showed that among early-onset BC without a family history of ovarian or BC, these genes were responsible for about 3% and 0%, respectively (Chen et al., 2009). The same type of study in Indonesia showed that BRCA1 and BRCA2 were responsible for 8.3% of the cases (Purnomosari et al., 2007). , accounts for only a small percentage of early-onset non-familial BC, indicating other low penetrance susceptibility genes could exist and play a role in tumorigenesis.

Genetic mutations occur in about 1% of the population and the most common type of germline variations are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Taylor et al., 2001). While SNP usually have little effect individually, polygenic models indicate combinations of genetic mutation, may together contribute to higher risk of cancer (Pharoah et al., 2002). A number of SNPs of several genes have been associated with susceptibility to early onset of BC, such as HER2 Ile655Val (Montgomery et al., 2003), MDM2 SNP309 and p53 Arg72Pro (Sun et al., 2009), ER1 594G to A (Yu et al., 2006) and p21 Ser31Arg (Ma et al., 2006; Qiu et al., 2010). Recent genome-wide association studies have identified genetic variations that may play a role as risk factors for breast cancer in populations of diverse ethnicity (Easton et al., 2007). SNP rs2981582 which lies in intron 2 of FGFR2 gene is the most significantly associated SNP among eleven SNPs that have been linked with BC (Easton et al., 2007). Further studies also proved the role of FGFR2 rs2981582 as a susceptible gene for early onset of BC (Raskin et al., 2008; Siddiqui et al., 2014), even though like other low penetrance genetic variant studies, the results are not consistent among populations. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the genotypes of p53 Arg72Pro, MDM2 SNP309 T to G, p21 Ser31Arg, HER2 Ile655Val, ER SNP594 G to A, and FGFR2 rs2981582 and their allele frequencies in a clinical group of early onset and late onset BC patients and to test for any correlations between certain genotypes or alleles with the risk of developing early onset BC in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Introduction

Study population and sample collection

This research was a hospital-based case control study that included 98 early-onset BC cases (< 40 years old at diagnosis) and 101 late-onset cases (> 55 years old) as the controls. These cases were pathologically diagnosed and recruited between the year 2006 – 2013 at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta Province Indonesia. The study received approval from the Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada (KE/FK/779/EC and KE/FK/570/EC/2015).

DNA extraction and genotyping

Spectrophotometric measurement of the absorbance ratio 260/280 nm were used to determine DNA purity and concentration. Genotyping of the 6 genes was performed using Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphisms (PCR-RFLP) assay. Details of selected SNPs, primer sequences used for PCR, sizes of PCR products and restriction endonuclease, (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, United States) used for digestion are described (Table 1). Restriction digested fragments from all of the SNPs were analyzed with 3% agarose gel electrophoresis (except for FGFR2, 4% of agarose).

Table 1.

Primers and Restriction Enzyme Used for Genotyping 6 Genes

Gene SNP rs number primer PCR product enzyme
p53 Pro72Arg rs1042522 F 5'- TTG CCG TCC CAA GCA ATG GAT GA -3' 199bp Bstu1
R 5'- TCT GGG AAG GGA CAG AAG ATG A -3'
MDM2 309 T>G rs2279744 F 5'- GAT TTC GGA CGG CTC TCG CGG C-3' 121bp PstI
R 5'- CAT CCG GAC CTC CCG CGC TG-3'
HER2 Ile655Val rs1136201 F 5'- AGA GAG CCA GCC CTC TGA CGT CCA T- 3' 148bp BsmAI
R 5'- TCC GTT TCC TGC AGC AGT CTC CGC A -3'
ER1 594 A>G rs2228480 F 5'- GAG GAG ACG GAC CAA AGC CAC -3' 227bp BtgI
R 5'- GCC ATT GGT GTT GGA TGC ATG C -3'
p21 Ser31Arg rs1801270 F 5'- ATA GTG TCT AAT CTC CGC CG -3' 245bp Blp1
R 5'- AAG TCA CCC TCC AGT GGT GT -3'
FGFR2 - rs2981582 F 5'- CCC TTT GGA GAC AAC GTG AGC C- 3' 176bp HinP1I
R 5'- CAG GCA CCA GGT GGA CTC TGC-3'

Statistical analyses

Data analysis used SPSS-21 software (IBM Corp., Chicago). The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was first applied to both case and control groups, separately for each variant before association analyses. Significance level (α) used was 5%. To calculate odds ratios (ORs), unconditional logistic regression model were used with 95% confidence interval (CI) as estimates of relative risk (RR) for the single locus alleles and genotypes.

Results

In this hospital-based case and control study, we analyzed 6 genes’ polymorphisms in 98 early-onset BC patients and 101 late-onset BC patients as the controls. The mean age at diagnosis for early-onset group was 36±4.2 years, while the late-onset group was 62±6.9 years. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium analysis showed no significant deviations between early and late-onset BC patients (p>0.05; data not shown).

Genotype distribution of each evaluated gene can be found in Table 2. Four genes showed high frequency in heterozygote genotypes, i.e. Arg/Pro of p53, T/G of MDM2, A/C of p21 and C/T of FGFR2 with proportion of 48%, 55.1%, 45.9% and 45.9%, respectively. There was no different proportion between early and late onset cases. On the other hand, genotype frequencies of HER2 and ER1 were different from the other 4 genes, as the most frequent genotype for HER2 was the homozygote wildtype (Ile/Ile), while for ER1 it was the homozygote mutant (G/G).

Table 2.

Genotype and Allelic Frequencies of P53 Pro72Arg, MDM2 SNP309, P21 Ser31Arg, ER SNP594, HER2 Ile655Val, and FGFR2 rs2981582 in Breast Cancer Patients with Different Age of Onset

Polymophisms Genotype/Allele Cases (<40) n=98 Controls (>=55) n=101 p-value OR 95% CI
HER2 Ile133Val I/I 73 (74.5%) 74 (73.3%) 0.614 ref ref
I/V 21 (21.4%) 25 (24.8%) 0.852 0.42-1.74
V/V 4 (4.1%) 2 (2.0%) 2,027 0.31-16.51
I 167 (85.2%) 173 (85.6%) 0.901 1,036 0.57-1.87
V 29 (14.8%) 29 (14.3%)
ER1 594A>G A/A 5 (5.1 %) 5 (5%) 0.52 ref ref
A/G 35 (35.7%) 44 (43.6%) 0.713 0.38-1.33
G/G 58 (59.2%) 52 (51.5%) 0.897 0.21-3.84
A 45 (23%) 54 (26.7%) 0.384 0.817 0.51-1.32
G 151 (77%) 148 (73.3%)
p53 Arg72Pro A/A 33 (33.7%) 25 (24.8%) 0.183 ref ref
A/P 47 (48%) 50 (49.5%) 0.637 0.31-1.29
P/P 18 (18.4%) 26 (25.7%) 0.489 0.20-1.17
A 114 (58.2%) 99 (49.0%) 0.067 0.691 0.46-1.05
P 82 (41.8%) 103(51.0%)
MDM2 SNP309 T/T 20 (20.5%) 23 (22.8%) 0.644 ref ref
T/G 54 (55.1%) 49 (48.5%) 0.789 0.39-1.61
G/G 24 (24.5%) 29 (28.7%) 1.051 0.47-2.36
T 94 (48.0%) 95 (47.0%) 0.853 1.038 0.7-1.54
G 102 (52.0%) 107 (53.0%)
p21 Ser31Arg C/C 21 (21.4%) 30 (29.7%) 0.047* ref ref
C/A 45(45.9%) 53(52.5%) 1.213 0.61-2.41
A/A 32(32.7%) 18 (17.8%) 2.54 1.14-5.67
C 87 (44.4%) 113 (56%) 0.021* 1.591 1.07-2.36
A 109 (55.6%) 89 (44%)
FGFR2 rs2981582 C/C 26(26.5%) 37 (36.6%) 0.091 ref ref
C/T 45 (45.9%) 48 (47.5%) 1.334 0.70-2.55
T/T 27(27.5%) 16 (15.8%) 2.401 1.08-5.32
C 97 (49.5%) 122 (60.4%) 0.028* 1.556 1.05-2.32
T 99 (50.5%) 80 (39.6%)

*, p<0.05; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Genotype C/C of P21 was mostly found in late onset compared to early onset cases (29.7% vs 21.4%), while frequency of genotype A/A was higher in early onset compared to late onset (32.7% vs 17. 8%). There were significant differences in frequency of p21 A/A and allele A found through Chi square tests in the younger group compared to older cases (p=0.047 and p=0.021, respectively). Similar circumstance was found in FGFR2 genes, where frequency of C/C genotype was higher in late onset compared to early onset (36.6% vs 26.5%), while T/T genotype was higher in early onset compared to late onset cases (27.5% vs 16.8%), but the difference was not statistically significant. Allele T was more frequently found in early onset cases compare to late onset (50.5% vs 39.6%), and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.028).

Logistic regression models comparing with Ser/Ser (C/C genotype) of P21, found those with Ser/Arg (C/A) and Arg/Arg (A/A) had OR of 1.213 (95% CI: 0.612-2.405) and 2.540 (95% CI: 1.138–5.668), respectively, suggesting that Ser31Arg polymorphisms are correlated with the increased risk of early onset BC. Similarly, T/T genotype and T allele of FGFR2 rs2981582 were found to increase the risk of early onset BC with OR of 2.40 (95% CI: 1.08–5.32) and 1.56 (95% CI: 1.05–2.32) respectively.

Discussion

Poor prognosis and low survival are linked to early onset of BC and accordingly, preventive measures by recognizing the risk factors are very much needed. Genetic variations in genes that regulate crucial processes such as cell apoptosis, proliferation and DNA repair are potential candidates for breast cancer risk factors. Recent research that was conducted in many different countries shows different outcomes among different populations.

In this study we evaluated 6 genes thathave been linked with susceptibility to early onset of BC, only two of them, P21 and FGFR2 were associated as risk factors in an Indonesian population.

P21 Se31Arg polymorphism

Results of the present study showed that AA genotype and A allele of P21 were significantly more frequently found in early onset cancer cases and had a 2.540 increased risk of early-onset BC (95% CI: 1.138–5.668). P21 (also identified as CDKN1A), which encodes p21WAF1/CIP1, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, is considered to significantly influence cell cycle control (Gartel and Radhakrishnan, 2005). One polymorphism of P21 that has received much attention is Ser31Arg (rs1801270), which substitutes A for C in the third base of codon 31 of P21 results in a serine to arginine amino acid substitution in the DNA-binding zinc finger motif of the protein (Mousses et al., 1995). Thus, it is very likely this polymorphism is also involved in cancer development (Lukas et al., 1997).

Several results support the role of P21 Ser31Arg polymorphism in BC risk (Keshava et al., 2002; Ma et al., 2006), but the results are inconclusive, possibly due to small effect of the polymorphism on BC risk and the relatively small number of samples used in the studies.

There have been several studies of P21 Ser31Arg polymorphism that were done to determine the risk of BC incidence. One meta-analysis study by Qiu and colleagues (Qiu et al., 2010) reported that the genotype C/C significantly increased the risk of breast cancer by 1.496 times (95% CI:1.164-1.924) for Caucasians. However, for the Asian population, there was no statistically significant increase in risk (OR 0.896; 95% CI:0.424-1.893).

FGFR2 rs2981582 polymorphism

FGFR2 is a member of the FGFR family that contributes to cell growth, malignancy, motility, and angiogenesis. Various meta-analysis studies have been conducted and reported that SNP FGFR2 rs2981582 TT is linked to an increased risk of BC, but until now the exact mechanism of carcinogenesis linking SNP FGFR2 rs2981582 TT to BC, especially early breast cancer onset has not been found (Zhang et al., 2010; Peng et al., 2011). In this study, frequency of C/C genotype was higher in patient with late onset compared to early onset (36.6% vs 26.5%) while T/T genotype was higher in younger cases compared to the older patients (27.5% vs 16.8%), but the result was not statistically significant. Interestingly, proportion of allele T was significantly different in early onset cases.

SNP FGFR2 rs2981582 intron 2 alters the binding of two transcription factors, Oct-1 / Runx2 and C / EBpb, resulting in increased expression of the FGFR2 gene in cell lines and mammary tissue (Jia et al., 2010). This overexpression is confirmed by the study of Rebbeck (Rebbeck et al., 2009) that reported FGFR2 over expression occurs in 10-15% of breast tumors, but FGFR2 expression is lower in normal breast tissue in someone who has T allele (Sun et al., 2010). In addition, the in vitro evidence also shows that the mechanism of carcinogenesis of the SNP is more directed toward the anti-apoptosis effect than the mitogenic effects which are partly mediated through the down-regulation of FOXO protein synthesis. Amplification of the FGFR2 gene due to SNP results in an increase in intracellular screening which affects the decrease of FOXO protein. FOXO proteins are involved in apoptotic induction, DNA damage repair, ROS detoxification, and down-regulation of ER-alpha and ER-beta transcription activities. Therefore, decreased protein synthesis of FOXO will decrease apoptosis, ROS detoxification function, DNA repair, and down-regulation of ER transcription activity (Murillo-Zamora et al., 2013).

All of the above findings significantly support our results that show FGFR2 gene polymorphism rs2981582 TT can be linked to increased risk of early onset BC in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This finding is consistent with a study conducted by Fu et al., (2012) which stated that TT and T allele genotypes in FGFR2 polymorphism rs2981582 increase the risk of early-onset BC in South Chinese Han populations with ORs of 3.062 (95% CI: 1.229-7.629) and 1.606 (95% CI: 1.084-2.380), respectively. But in the study, the controls used were healthy women, as well as the age-appropriate early-onset BC limit was <35 years. There is no similar study that discusses the relationship of early onset of breast cancer and FGFR2 polymorphism in other populations, but a study by Liang (Liang et al., 2008) found that there is a strong association of TT mutant genotypes and T alleles in FGFR2 polymorphism rs2981582 as risk factors of occurrence of BC in premenopausal women.

Our study indicates that the A allele of P21 and the allele T of FGFR2 may be linked to increased risk of early-onset BC in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In order to confirm the findings, further analyses are needed.

Funding statement

This study received grant support from Dana Masyarakat Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada 2015 and 2016.

Presentation statement

The manuscript has been presented as poster presentation in 9th General Assembly and International Conference 2018. Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention, Jeju Island, South Korea, 19-20 April 2018

References

  1. Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, et al. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol. 2009;36:237–49. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assi HA, Khoury KE, Dbouk H, et al. Epidemiology and prognosis of breast cancer in young women. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:2–8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.05.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen W, Pan K, Ouyang T, et al. BRCA1 germline mutations and tumor characteristics in Chinese women with familial or early-onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:55–60. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature. 2007;447:1087–93. doi: 10.1038/nature05887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu F, Wang C, Huang M, et al. Polymorphisms in second intron of the FGFR2 gene are associated with the risk of early-onset breast cancer in Chinese Han women. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;226:221–9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.226.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gartel AL, Radhakrishnan SK. Lost in transcription: p21 repression, mechanisms, and consequences. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3980–5. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, et al. Young age: an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-4-82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jia C, Cai Y, Ma Y, et al. Quantitative assessment of the effect of FGFR2 gene polymorphism on the risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124:521–8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0872-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Keshava C, Frye BL, Wolff MS, et al. Waf-1 (p21) and p53 polymorphisms in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:127–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liang J, Chen P, Hu Z, et al. Genetic variants in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) contribute to susceptibility of breast cancer in Chinese women. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:2341–6. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lukas J, Groshen S, Saffari B, et al. WAF1/Cip1 gene polymorphism and expression in carcinomas of the breast, ovary, and endometrium. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:167–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ma H, Jin G, Hu Z, et al. Variant genotypes of CDKN1A and CDKN1B are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2173–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Lynch HT, et al. Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1384–92. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Montgomery KG, Gertig DM, Baxter SW, et al. The HER2 I655V polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in women < age 40 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1109–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mousses S, Ozcelik H, Lee PD, et al. Two variants of the CIP1/WAF1 gene occur together and are associated with human cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:1089–92. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.6.1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Murillo-Zamora E, Moreno-Macias H, Ziv E, et al. Association between rs2981582 polymorphism in the FGFR2 gene and the risk of breast cancer in Mexican women. Arch Med Res. 2013;44:459–66. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Peng S, Lu B, Ruan W, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: evidence from meta-analyses, pooled analyses, and genome-wide association studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:309–24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1459-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M, et al. Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet. 2002;31:33–6. doi: 10.1038/ng853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Purnomosari D, Pals G, Wahyono A, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation analysis in the Indonesian population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:297–304. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9493-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Qiu LX, Zhang J, Zhu XD, et al. The p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 51,236 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124:475–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0858-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Raskin L, Pinchev M, Arad C, et al. FGFR2 is a breast cancer susceptibility gene in Jewish and Arab Israeli populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1060–5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rebbeck TR, DeMichele A, Tran TV, et al. Hormone-dependent effects of FGFR2 and MAP3K1 in breast cancer susceptibility in a population-based sample of post-menopausal African-American and European-American women. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:269–74. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Siddiqui S, Chattopadhyay S, Akhtar MS, et al. A study on genetic variants of Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) and the risk of breast cancer from North India. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stratton MR, Rahman N. The emerging landscape of breast cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2008;40:17–22. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sun C, Olopade OI, Di Rienzo A. rs2981582 is associated with FGFR2 expression in normal breast. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2010;197:193–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sun YF, Leu JD, Chen SM, et al. Results based on 124 cases of breast cancer and 97 controls from Taiwan suggest that the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP309) in the MDM2 gene promoter is associated with earlier onset and increased risk of breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor JG, Choi EH, Foster CB, et al. Using genetic variation to study human disease. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:507–12. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(01)02183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yu JC, Hsu HM, Chen ST, et al. Breast cancer risk associated with genotypic polymorphism of the genes involved in the estrogen-receptor-signaling pathway: a multigenic study on cancer susceptibility. J Biomed Sci. 2006;13:419–32. doi: 10.1007/s11373-006-9069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang J, Qiu LX, Wang ZH, et al. Current evidence on the relationship between three polymorphisms in the FGFR2 gene and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;124:419–24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0846-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES