Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2019;20(11):3269–3277. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3269

Prevalence of Human Papilloma Virus Sub Genotypes following Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Asian Continent, A Systematic Review Article

Naeem Bukhari 1,*, Joe P Joseph 2, Joseph Hussain 3, Muhammad Adeeb Muhammad Adeeb 4, Marcel Jose Yibirin Wakim 5, Esam Bashir Yahya 6, Amina Arif 7, Afshan Saleem 8, Nadeem Sharif 9
PMCID: PMC7063012  PMID: 31759348

Abstract

Objectives:

In current era of blue brain intelligence and technology access at ease, standardization of disease etiology demands extensive research to drop-down human papilloma virus associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas impact at large. Present retrospection aims to estimate comparative association of human papilloma virus sub-genotypes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, critical analysis of existing research gap, treatment progress, co-infection, gender association, national status and challenges following Human papilloma virus led head and neck squamous cell carcinomas among world largest continent.

Background:

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are not just like malignancies of uterine cervix, lymph nodes and breast cancers. Human papilloma virus led head and neck squamous cell carcinomas treatment directly impact Central nervous system in humans. Intriguingly, human papilloma virus mediated immune response increases patient survival, which indirectly transmit human papilloma virus in future generations and act as a potential threat developing neurogenic disorders.

Methods:

An objective based search strategy, following comprehensive and specific search approaches were made to retrieve recent 12 years research data from five different NCBI databases. Out of 300 shortlisted articles, only 24 principal studies met the inclusion criteria.

Results:

Highest human papilloma virus prevalence (10.42 %) was found in South Asia, 5.8 % in South East Asia, 5.7 % East Asia, 2.5% in west Asia and no relevant updated data was found from central Asian continent. Highest prevalence (10%) of HPV genotype-16 was recorded in Asia among 3, 710 enrolled cases including 2201 males, 1149 females and 360 cases of unknown gender. While undifferentiated multiple HPV genotype prevalence was 5.5 % (204 cases). Lowest percentage of HPV sub-types 68, 72, 57, 39 were recorded respectively. Pakistan ranked top reporting highest number of HPV-16 cases, Taiwan HPV-18, India HPV-31, Japan HPV-35 and Singapore in HPV-16 and HPV-18 co-infection rates respectively.

Conclusions:

Exact prevalence of HPV associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas among Asian population is still debatable. Due to higher heterogeneity (P< 0.00001), I2 = 81-88% at 95 % confidence interval), non-availability and limitations of reported studies from Asian sub-continents especially central Asia, western Asia and from south and south east Asia demand large scale collaborative research culture to standardize head and neck squamous cell carcinomas aetiology.

Key Words: HPV, HNSCC, South Asia, Central Asia, Middle East

Introduction

Classically HPV led squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck arise from oropharynx impacting multiple sites including, lip, tongue, eye, chin and nasopharynx as well (Syrjanen et al., 1983). Globally HNSCCs are the sixth most common deadly malignancies, causing 350,000 deaths each year with annual incidence of 600,000 reported cases (Ferlay et al., 2010). While, study of National statistics office in United Kingdom reported 7,745 cases each year (Office for National Statistics, 2009). Specifically, Oropharyngeal and tongue malignancies are predominant cancers in west. However, in general HNSCC a heterogenous group of tumours are shortly reported from South Asia instead of entire Asian continent (Bhurgri et al., 2006). According to Faheem A et al study in 2009, HNSCC is considered second most prevalent type of cancer in Pakistani subjects alone with recorded incidence of 40.1% (Bhurgri et al., 2006; Faheem et al., 2009). Commencing comparative clinical aetiology of HNSCCs from Europe based case control studies. About (70-75%) HNSCCs cases are synergistically associated with tobacco and alcohol consumption accompanied by familial history (Hashibe et al., 2009; McKay et al., 2011). Whereas, (10-15%) HNSSCs cases are associated with decreased intake of fruit and vegetables (Chuang et al., 2012; De Feo et al., 2008). In contrast to European countries, betel-quid chewing also plays a major role in the development of malignant tumours focusing Asian subjects (Chen et al., 2008). Molecular biology of Head and neck carcinomas revealed that genetic mutations and chromosomal abnormalities, especially mutation of p53 gene involvement in development of head and neck cancers (Leemans et al., 2011). Recent progression in research trends indicated decline in alcohol and tobacco induced HNSCCs. Whereases, Prevalence of HPV induced HNSCCs is increasing. Another supporting evidence suggest higher chances of HPV transmission during sexual behaviour in comparison to tobacco and alcohol consumption (Chaturvedi et al., 2011; Gillison., et al 2012). Instead of HPV-genotypes independently, co-infection with Epstein Barr virus also errand development of nasopharyngeal carcinomas (Termine et al., 2008). Classical research reported 95% prevalence of HPV in cervical carcinomas and 12.8%-59.9 % association of HPV-Subtypes in HNSCCs, including HPV-35, HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-18 and HPV-16. Which clearly highlights existing research gap focusing HPV subtype specific prevalence and exact role following HNSCCs (Syrjanen et al., 1983; zur et al., 2009; Westra et al., 2009; Liebertz et al., 2010; Nasman et al., 2009; Ha et al., 2009). HPV led HNSCCs require progressive and meticulous treatment measures. After critical care and monitoring only five-year survival rate of 68% was possibly achieved yet. While delayed tumour detection and improper treatment may impact nervous system in humans. Intriguingly, HPV mediated immune response increases patient survival, which indirectly transmit HPV in future generations and act as a potential threat developing neurogenic disorders (Pai et al., 2009; Howlader et al., 2009).

Present retrospection aims to estimate comparative association of HPV sub-genotypes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas among world largest continent. The main objectives include to critically analyse existing research gap, epigenetic treatment progress, multiple genotype co-infection, gender association, national status and challenges following HPV related head and neck squamous cell carcinomas among Asian people.

Materials and Methods

Database search strategy

An objective based search strategy, following comprehensive and specific search approaches to retrieve recent 12.5-year research data from five different NCBI databases including PubMed, MeSH, PubMed Central, NLM Catalog and Bookshelf.

Inclusion and exclusion Criteria

The articles published in English language focusing human subject only were considered. Criteria followed include recent 12.5-year studies reported from five different geographic regions of Asia. Studies who had significantly explained the role of any sub-genotype of HPV in head and neck cancer. While, studies contradicting above mentioned inclusion criteria were considered ineligible and excluded. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are mentioned in Table 1.

Table 1.

Detailed Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria Exclusion criteria
Original Studies focusing HPV as ethology in HNC Studies followed other than HPV role in HNC like, HPV role in cervical cancer
Studies reported from Central Asia, Middle East, East Asia, South Asia and western Asia. Studies reported from other then Asian geographic regions
Clinical studies Review articles, case reports, letter to the editor and short communication
Articles written in English language Studies published in Other than English language
Articles who focused human subjects Other than human subjects
Patients irrespective of age and gender Studies reporting no relevant age and gender associated information.
Studies reported till 30th August 2019. Studies published before 1st Jan 2007.

Studies Selection

By Specific approach overall, Principal author and third co-author shortlisted n = 300 abstracts from NCBI databases, including n = 236 duplicate and older than Jan-2009 were excluded for further analysis. From above mentioned 300 citations, only 64 full text articles were found. But, Due to irrelevance with inclusion criteria 40 full text articles were excluded. However, 24 principal studies were focussed and critically analyzed Table 2.

Table 2.

Comprehensive Studies Selection Protocol Following Five Different Databases by Prisma

graphic file with name APJCP-20-3269-g002.jpg

Data Retrieval and Risk Measures

Two co-investigators belonging from another country focused on data review and validation in collaboration with principal author for each included study. Country of study, first author, year of publication, type/site of lesion, number of cases included. Specific HPV type and overall prevalence of HPV in head and neck cancer infection was also studied. Prevalence estimation was done as total number of patient positive for specific HPV-subtype divided by total number of HNSCC patients. The accuracy of data search was counter checked by a second researcher, Further, Omissions; errors were resolved by sharing it with another co-investigator from another territory.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done by using Revman 5.30, Prisma and Microsoft Excel 2010 multiple tools.

Characteristics of Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis concentrating number of included studies from a country, patient selection, mean age, method followed, and relative outcomes as described in (Table 3) from 24 eligible studies. Khovidhunkit et al., (2008) reported only one patient with non-specific HPV out of 65 oral squamous cell carcinomas cases. Luo et al., (2007) examined 51 oral squamous cell carcinoma biopsies and reported 25 % high risk HPV positive cases. HPV-16 and HPV-18 were more prevalent than HPV-33 and HPV-52. Similar study carried by Li-Ang Lee et al., in (2012) reported increasing trend of high-risk HPV in Taiwan. Akhtar et al., (2013) examined 34 oral squamous cell carcinoma confirmed patients. author followed PCR method for detection of HPV subtypes highlighting no one person was affected by any specific high-risk HPV type among Bengali patients. Zhang et al., (2006) highlighted HPV association in oral squamous cell carcinomas including high risk HPV-16 and HPV-18 were positive among 18 patients out of total 63 confirmed cases. In 2012 two similar studies were carried out, one on healthy patient saliva and other on Oral squamous cell carcinomas patients reported 6.1 % and 3.9 % high HPV-6, HPV-18, HPV-66 and HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-33, HPV-57 respectively (Hafed et al., 2012; Seifi et al., 2013). Another past study carried by Kermani I et al in 2012 reported 42.8% patients with high risk HPV-16 and HPV-18. He examined fourteen different Oro-pharyngeal, hypo-pharyngeal and laryngeal carcinoma patients. Maruyama H et al., 2014 reported 34.4 % specific type HPV 16, 18, 33, 35, 58 respectively among 163 confirmed patients of oropharynx. A recent study reported 20.4% high risk HPV-16 among 206 oral squamous cell carcinomas patients (Kerishnan et al., 2016). Baig et al., (2012) reported 47 HPV patients with high risk HPV-16 and HPV-18. They examined oral submucosal tissues from 262 Gutkka addict persons and HPV was present in 20 % patients. Na-Kyung Ryoo et al., 2013 tested 54 patients of retinoblastoma, found all patients were HPV negative. Another same country study conducted by Lee et al., (2010) on oral tongue lesions reported 36% non-specific HPV positive cases. Their Data showed 13 patients were HPV positive. Gunasekera et al., (2015) reported 46% high risk HPV-16 and HPV-18. Total 78 oropharyngeal carcinoma biopsies were included in study. In total 65 laryngeal and hypo-laryngeal carcinoma for high risk HPV-16. Only 27 (41.5%) samples were positive for HPV-16. Two studies conducted by Hafed et al., (2012) and Mansour et al., (2012) reported that high risk HPV-16 and HPV-18 were 23.52% and 86% respectively in tumour samples. Due to limited number of studies and underdeveloped infrastructure only one recent study conducted by Jalouli et al., (2012) reported that 20% HPV were positive in oral squamous cell carcinomas.

Table 3.

Characteristics of in Studies Included in Meta-analysis

Country Study conducted Year No of
positive
cases
Total Male Female Unknown Mean
Age Y
Method Outcomes
Pakistan Baig et al 2012 47 262 42 220 0 27 PCR ND
Pakistan Adnan Ali SM et al 2018 95 140 82 58 0 40 PCR 16,18
Pakistan Adnan Ali SM et al 2018 31 112 76 36 0 47.8 PCR 16, 18, both
Pakistan Zil-e-Rubab et al 2018 74 300 210 90 0 36 PCR 16, 18
India Gheit, T. et al 2017 50 364 263 101 0 53.6 PCR 16, 18, 31, 35, 56
Singapore Soo Yee Tan et al 2016 144 159 0 0 159 60.7 PCR 16, 18, 31, 45, 56, 68
China, Pakistan Mujtaba H et al 2018 12 506 305 201 0 19 PCR 6, 11, 16, 58
Thailand Khovidhunkit et al 2008 1 65 15 50 0 0 0 0
Taiwan Luo et al 2007 13 51 48 3 0 55 PCR 16, 18, 33, 52
Taiwan Li-Ang Lee et al 2012 71 333 316 17 0 51 PCR 16,18,52
Iran Seifi et al 2013 7 114 52 53 9 31.6 PCR 6, 18, 66
Iran Nikakhlagh et al 2012 7 176 151 25 0 67 PCR 16, 18,33,57
Iran Kermani et al 2012 6 14 6 8 0 39.7 PCR 16,18
South Korea Na-Kyung Ryoo et al 2013 0 54 0 0 54 2 ISH ND
South Korea Lee et al 2010 13 36 0 0 36 0 PCR ND
Egypt Hafed et al 2012 8 34 12 22 0 56 IHC 16,18
Egypt Mansour et al 2012 26 30 15 15 0 52.9 PCR 16
Bangladesh Akhtar et al 2013 1 34 0 0 34 0 PCR, IHC, ISH ND
China Zhang et al 2016 18 63 25 38 0 56 PCR 16, 18
Japan Maruyama et al 2014 68 496 380 66 50 65 PCR 16, 18, 33, 35, 58
Malaysia Kerishnan et al 2016 42 206 68 138 0 48.9 PCR 16
Sri Lanka Gunasekera et al 2015 36 78 73 5 0 0 ELIZA 16,18
Turkey Bozdayi et al 2009 27 65 62 3 0 58 ND 16
Yemen Jalouli et al 2012 1 18 0 0 18 61.5 PCR ND

ND, not determined.

Results

Based on purely two objective based search strategies including comprehensive and specific quality data retrieval approaches. overall 56,302 search results, 10,999 were reported from south Asia, 2,346 from middle East, 1,710 from central Asia, 1,229 from East Asia and only 17 search results from western Asia were found from recent eleven year published sources (Table 4). Our specific approach was based upon shortlisting relevant studies reported from each of five Asian regions.

Table 4.

Comprehensive and Specific Data Retrieval Outcomes

No Search Terms Different Database Search Results
Overall Results
PubMed MeSH PubMed Central NLM Catalog Book Shelf
1 HNSCC in Asia 704 0 4,062 6 84 4,856
2 HPV in HNSCC 2,753 0 8,614 3 147 11,517
3 HPV subtypes in HNSCC 101 0 2,037 0 30 2,168
4 HNSCC aetiology 66 0 1,640 0 41 1,747
5 HPV vaccination 7,000 0 11,910 30 773 19,713
6 HPV in Central Asia 54 0 1,573 0 83 1,710
7 HPV in East Asia 58 0 1,124 0 47 1,229
8 HPV in South Asia 89 0 10,908 2 0 10,999
9 HPV in Weston Asia 0 0 17 0 0 17
10 HPV in Middle East 422 0 1,850 0 74 2,346

Reflecting 24 principal studies, overall (9 %) prevalence of HPV was recorded in South Asia, 5.04 % in South East Asia,4.93 % East Asia, 2.21 % in west Asia, 0.32% from a bilateral Pak-Chinese study and no relevant updated patients’ data was found from central Asian continent regarding HNSCC. From comparative point of regional HPV prevalence, highest prevalence of HPV was noted in south Asia, south East Asia and very less in central and west parts of Asian continent respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparative Analysis of HPV Distribution in Asian Continent

HPV-genotype Specific Prevalence

Overall highest prevalence (10.08%) of HPV sub-genotype-16 was recorded in Asia among 3, 710 enrolled cases including 2,201 males, 1,149 females and 360 cases of unknown gender. While multiple HPV genotype prevalence was 5.5 % (204 cases), HPV-18 (2.12%), HPV-16 and 18 co-infection (1.51%) and 1.3 % cases were not known for any type specific HPV-genotype following whole Asian continent. Lowest percentage of HPV sub-genotypes 68, 72, 57, 39 were recorded respectively (Table 5).

Table 5.

Prevalence of HNSCC Linked HPV Sub-genotypes among Asian Population at 95% CI by Revman5.30

Country "Positive
cases"
Total Male Female Other "HPV 6" "HPV 11" HPV 16 "HPV 18" "HPV 31" "HPV 33" "HPV 35" "HPV 39" "HPV 45" "HPV 52" "HPV 56" "HPV 57" "HPV 58" "HPV 66" "HPV 68" "HPV 72" "Both 16,18" "Multiple genotype" ND
South Asia
Pakistan 247 814 410 404 0 0 0 101 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 41 47
India 50 364 263 101 0 0 0 36 4 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bangladesh 1 34 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Sri Lanka 36 78 73 5 0 0 0 11 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0
Total 344 1290 746 510 34 0 0 148 41 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 46 42 47
"Relative %HPV Prevalnce in south Asia" 9 34/77 20/11 13/75 0/92 0 0 4 1/11 0/16 0 0/05 0 0 0 0/05 0 0 0 0 0 1/24 1/13 1/27
South East Asia
Singapur 144 159 0 0 159 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 0
Thailand 1 65 15 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Malaysia 42 206 68 138 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 187 430 83 188 159 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 1
"Relative %HPV Prevalnce in south East Asia" 5/04 11/59 2/24 5/07 4/29 0 0 1/24 0 0 0 0 0 0/05 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3/72 0/03
East Asia
China 18 63 25 38 0 0 0 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Japan 68 496 380 66 50 0 0 62 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Korea 13 90 0 0 90 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Taiwan 84 384 364 20 0 0 0 29 23 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 21 0
Total 183 1033 769 124 140 0 0 115 27 0 1 3 1 0 8 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 23 0
"Relative %HPV Prevalnce in East Asia" 4/93 27/84 20/73 3/34 3/77 0 0 3/1 0/73 0 0/03 0/08 0/03 0 0/22 0 0 0/03 0/03 0 0/03 0/05 0/62 0
West Asia
Iran 20 304 209 86 9 0 0 6 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Egypt 34 64 27 37 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0
Turkey 27 65 62 3 0 1 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yemen 1 18 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Total 82 451 298 126 27 1 0 58 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 1 0
"Relative %HPV Prevalnce inWest Asia" 2/21 12/16 8/03 3/4 0/73 0/03 0 1/56 0/3 0 0/03 0 0 0 0 0 0/03 0 0/03 0 0 0/22 0/03 0
Un-Categorlzed
China, Pakistan 12 506 305 201 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Relative % Prevalnce in Pak-China 0/32 13/64 8/22 5/42 0 0/05 0/05 0/19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/03 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total ASIA 798 3710 2201 1149 360 3 2 374 79 6 2 5 1 2 8 2 1 2 2 0 1 56 204 48
"Relative %HPV Prevalnce Asia" 21/51 100 59/33 30/97 9/7 0/08 0/05 10/08 2/13 0/16 0/05 0/13 0/03 0/05 0/22 0/05 0/03 0/05 0/05 0 0/03 1/51 5/5 1/29

Assessment of risk bias and clinical heterogeneity

By following dichotomous data analysis random effect model at 95% CI. A significant clinical heterogeneity (Tau2 = 1.14, P< 0.00001, I2 = 87 %) was found between HPV positive HNSCCs and type specific HPV-16 led HNSCCs in Asian continent with an overall Odd ratio = 3. 41. (Figure 2A). Whereas, type specific HPV-18 clinical heterogeneity (Tau2 = 1.87, P< 0.00001, I2 = 81 %) with an Odd ratio of = 14.57 (Figure 2B). clinical heterogeneity following HPV co-genotype 16-18 in HNSCCs and HPV multi-genotype led HNSCCs (Tau2 = 5.43, P< 0.00001, I2 = 85 %) with an Odd ratio = 0.47 (Figure 2C). Comparing HPV-16 positive and HPV-18 positive genotype prevalence a significant heterogeneity was calculated (Tau2 = 3.52, P< 0.00001, I2 = 88 %). Greater heterogeneity in methodological aspect of included studies was also observed. Due to variable genotype testing methods including, PCR primers, ELIZA kits, ISH protocols and diversity in detection of HPV sub-genotypes followed by each individual study (Table 3). In parallel to determine the level of heterogeneity in our meta-analysis, we followed random effect model to estimate clear HPV type specific genotype prevalence in Asian continent (Table 5A- Table 5D).

Figure 2A.

Figure 2A

Forest Plot of Comparison, HPV Positive in HNSCCs and Type Specific HPV-16 Led HNSCCs

Figure 2B.

Figure 2B

Forest Plot of Comparison, HPV Positive in HNSCCs and Type Specific HPV-18 Led HNSCC

Figure 2C.

Figure 2C

Forest Plot of Comparison, HPV Positive in HNSCCs and Multi -HPV Genotype Led HNSCCs

The highest heterogeneity (Tau2 =10.70, P< 0.00001, I2 = 89 %, z = 5.09) was observed in overall 798 HPV positive cases in comparison to 48 non-determined HPV genotype case groups (Figure 2E).

Figure 2E.

Figure 2E

Forest Plot of Comparison, Positive in HNSCCs Cases and HPV-ND Genotype Led HNSCCs

HPV Sub-genotypes regional prevalence trends

South Asia

In south Asia HPV specific genotype HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-16,18 in combination and multiple HPV genotype were most prevalent 4% ,1.11% and 1.24% and 1.13% respectively. Pakistan ranked top reporting highest prevalence (2.72%) of HPV-16 and India in HPV-31(0.61%), (Table 2).

South East Asia

HPV was (5.04 %) prevalent in south East Asia. However, 3.72 % multiple HPV genotypes were only reported from Singapore and overall HPV-16 was (1.24%) prevalent in South East Asia (Table 2).

East Asia

In total 1,033 (27.84%) cases reported from east Asia HPV was found in 183 (4.93%) cases including (3.10%) HPV-16, 0.37% HPV-18, 0.03% HPV-33, HPV-39, HPV-58, HPV-66 and HPV-72 respectively. While 0.62 % cases were affected with multiple HPV genotypes. Taiwan was on top reporting (0.6%) prevalence of HPV-18 and in Japan HPV-35 was (0.08%) prevalent (Table 2).

West Asia

In western Asia 2.21% prevalence of HPV was estimated. Similarly, HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotypes were found most prevalent. Equal prevalence of HPV-16 was obtained from both Egypt and Turkey (Table 2).

Un-Categorized group

A collaborative study conducted by Mujtaba et al., (2018) enrolled 506 HNSCC patients both from china and Pakistan. HPV was prevalent in 12 cases (0.32%). Inclusion of Mujtaba et al., (2018) in a distinct category was done to highlight recent progress in collaborative research culture as well (Table 2).

Central Asia

Unfortunately, as per criteria set forth, not a single study from central Asian territories were found including Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan.

Figure 2D.

Figure 2D

Forest Plot of Comparison, HPV-16 Positive in HNSCCs and HPV-18 Genotype Led HNSCCs

Discussion

First time our review critically analyzed the available literature covering the whole Asian continent and reported 21.5% prevalence of HPV associated HNSCCs with clear heterogeneity insights. While prior to current study HPV association in HNSCCs was considered in the range of 12.8%-59.9 %, including HPV-35, HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-18 and HPV-16 genotypes only. (zur et al., 2009; Westra et al., 2009; Liebertz et al., 2010; Nasman et al., 2009). However, our review was a collaborative research effort to minimize cancer research gap in Asian continent and focussed prevalence of more than fifteen HPV sub-genotypes. Similar large scale regional and worldwide studies covering whole Asia reported (33%) HPV prevalence in HNC-subsite (Oral cavity) among Asians, 16% in European and 16. 1% North American populations respectively (Kreimer et al., 2005) In 2014 another review reported by Abogunrin S et al focusing European population estimated 40 % prevalence of HPV in head and neck carcinomas. We accept exact prevalence of HPV associated HNSCCs among Asian population is still debateable and our study has certain limitations including non-availability of homogenise reported studies from Asian sub-continents especially central Asia, western Asia and even from south and south east Asia demand large scale collaborative research culture to standardize HPV led HNSCCs aetiology. Beside very potential outcomes, our review has certain limitations including a significant level of heterogeneity in comprised studies, Publication year, variable number of patients, specimen type and HPV detection methods. Similarly, the possibility of confounder cannot be ignoring, because some studies evaluated more then one type of HPV sub-genotype. while an included study detected HPV-16 genotype only as well.

In conclusion, highest priority should be given to initiate homogeneity cancer research programs among Asian countries especially; Afghanistan, Iraq, Nepal and Yemen to assess the tumour positivity rates of HPV in HNSCCs. While in countries like Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Thailand, North Korea, Iran, Japan and Turkey more collaborative research is needed to standardize prevalence of HPV associated HNSCCs across Asian Continent.

Conflict of Interest

Nil.

Abbreviations

PCR, Polymerase chain reaction; ISH, in-situ-hybridizations; ELIZA, Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; HPV, human papilloma virus; HNC, head and neck cancer; CNS, Central Nervous System.

References

  1. Abogunrin S, Tanna GLD, Keeping S, Carroll Sand Iheanacho I. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancers in European populations: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:968. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adnan Ali, Awan SM, Atif MS, Ali S, Mirza N. Correlation of human papillomavirus infection and clinical parameters with five-year survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132:628–35. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118000361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adnan Ali, Mirza SM, Ahmad Y, Zahid Z, Enam SA. Human Papillomavirus and human cytomegalovirus infection and association with prognosis in primary glioblastoma patients of Pakistan. World Neurosurg. 2018;121:931–39. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akhtar M, Ali L, Hassan Z, Khan I. Association of Human Papilloma virus infection and oral squamous cell carcinoma in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;1:65–69. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i1.14750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asvadi Kermani I, Seifi SH, Dolatkhah R, et al. Human Papilloma virus in head and neck squamous cell cancer. Iran J Cancer Prev. 2012;5:21–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baig S, Lucky MH, Qamar A, et al. Human papilloma virus and oral lesions in gutka eating subjects in Karachi. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012;22:135–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Usman A, et al. Epidemiological review of head and neck cancers in Karachi. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bozdayi G, Kemaloglu Y, Ekinci O, et al. Role of human papillomavirus in the clinical and histopathologic features of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38:119–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–4301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen YJ, Chang JT, Liao CT, et al. Head and neck cancer in the betel quid chewing area: recent advances in molecular carcinogenesis. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1507–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00863.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chuang SC, Jenab M, Heck JE, et al. Diet and the risk of head and neck cancer: a pooled analysis in the INHANCE consortium. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:69–88. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9857-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Feo E, Rowell J, Cadoni G, et al. A case-control study on the effect of apoliprotein E genotype on head and neck cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2839–46. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Faheem A. Cancer registration in Pakistan: contemporary. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8:452–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gheit T, Anantharaman D, Holzinger D, et al. 2017), Role of mucosal high-risk human papillomavirus types in head and neck cancers in central India. Int J Cancer. 141:143–51. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillison ML, Broutian T, Pickard RK, et al. Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009-2010. JAMA. 2012;307:693–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunasekera SK, Perera KA, Fernado C, Udagama PV. A shifting paradigm in the etiology of oral and pharyngeal cancer in Sri Lanka: a case-control study providing serologic evidence for the role of oncogenic HPV types 16 and 18. Infect Agents Cancer. 2015;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13027-015-0007-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ha PK, Chang SS, Glazer CA, Califano JA, Sidransky D. Molecular techniques and genetic alterations in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:335–9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hafed L, Farag H, Shaker O, El-Rouby D. Is human papilloma virus associated with salivary gland neoplasms? An in situ-hybridization study. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:1194–9. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanif M, Zaidi P, Kamal S, Hameed A. Institution-based cancer incidence in a local population in Pakistan: nine-year data analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:227–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hashibe M, Brennan P, Chuang SC, et al. Interaction between tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:541–50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Stat Rev. 2013;2013:1975–2011. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jalouli J, Jalouli MM, Sapkota D, et al. Human papilloma virus, herpes simplex virus and Epstein Barr virus in oral squamous cell carcinoma from eight different countries. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:571–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kerishnan PJ, Gopinath SC B, Kai SB, et al. Detection of Human Papillomavirus 16-specific IgG and IgM antibodies in patient sera: A potential indicator of oral squamous cell carcinoma risk factor. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13:424–31. doi: 10.7150/ijms.14475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Khovidhunkit SO, Buajeeb W, Sanguansin S, Poomsawat S, Weerapradist W. Detection of human papillomavirus in oral squamous cell carcinoma, leukoplakia and lichen planus in Thai patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008;9:771–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:467–75. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee L-A, Huang C-G, Liao C-T, et al. Human Papillomavirus-16 infection in advanced oral cavity cancer patients is related to an increased risk of distant metastases and poor survival. J Pone. 2012;7:406–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee SY, Cho NH, Choi EC, et al. Relevance of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection to carcinogenesis of oral tongue cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:678–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJ, Brakenhoff RH. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liebertz DJ, Lechner MG, Masood R, et al. Establishment and characterization of a novel head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line USC-HN1. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-2-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luo CW, Roan CH, Liu CJ. Human papilloma viruses in oral squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions detected by PCR-based genechip array. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:153–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mansour A, Ali M, Helmy H, Kassim S. Human papillomavirus-16 (HPV-16) infection association with CIAP-2 expression in head and neck cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2459–65. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-0143-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Maruyama H, Yasui T, Fujiwara TI, et al. Human papillomavirus and p53 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma among Japanese population. Cancer Sci. 2014;105:409–17. doi: 10.1111/cas.12369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McKay JD, Truong T, Gaborieau V, et al. A genome-wide association study of upper aerodigestive tract cancers conducted within the INHANCE consortium. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mujtaba H, Wang Y, Duan Y, et al. Human papillomavirus in tonsillectomy specimen from China and Pakistan- Prevalence and genotype distribution. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214:1713–8. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nasman A, Attner P, Hammarstedt L, et al. Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:362–6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nikakhlagh S, Saki N, Shoar MH, Sartipipor A, Saki S. Incidence of etiologic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck in Ahvaz. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;24:67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryoo NK, Kim JE, Choung HK, et al. Human Papilloma virus in Retinoblastoma tissues from Korean Patients. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013;27:368–371. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2013.27.5.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seifi S, Asvadi Kermani I, Dolatkhah R, et al. Prevalence of oral human papilloma virus in healthy individuals in East Azerbaijan province of Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42:79–85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Soo Yee Tan L, Petersson F, Ker L, et al. High-risk HPV genotypes and P16INK4a expression in a cohort of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients in Singapore. Oncotarget. 2016:7. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Syrjanen K, Syrjanen S, Lamberg M, Pyrhonen S, Nuutinen J. Morphological and immunohistochemical evidence suggesting human papillomavirus (HPV) involvement in oral squamous cell carcinogenesis. Int J Oral Surg. 1983;12:418–24. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(83)80033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Syrjanen K, Vayrynen M, Castren O, et al. Morphological and immunohistochemical evidence of human papilloma virus (HPV) involvement in the dysplastic lesions of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1983;21:261–9. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(83)90015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Syrjanen KJ, Syrjanen SM, Lamberg MA, Pyrhonen S. Human papillomavirus (HPV) involvement in squamous cell lesions of the oral cavity. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1983;79:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Termine N, Panzarella V, Falaschini S, et al. HPV in oral squamous cell carcinoma vs head and neck squamous cell carcinoma biopsies: a meta-analysis (1988–2007) Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1681–90. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Westra W. The changing face of head and neck cancer in the 21st century: the impact of HPV on the epidemiology and pathology of oral cancer. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:78–81. doi: 10.1007/s12105-009-0100-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yoshizaki T, Endo K, Ren QC, et al. Oncogenic role of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNAs (EBERs) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007;34:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2006.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zil-E R, Baig S, Zaman U, Lucky MH. Human papilloma virus 16/18: Fabricator of trouble in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;69:115–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zur HH. Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers - a brief historical account. Virology. 2009;2:260–5. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES