Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229916

Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

Abdi A Gele 1,*,#, Fathia K Musse 2,¤b,#, Mary Shrestha 1,¤a, Samera Qureshi 1,¤a
Editor: Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh3
PMCID: PMC7064199  PMID: 32155181

Abstract

Background

The European Action Plan for Sexual and Reproductive Health emphasizes the importance of improving access to contraceptive services for disadvantaged groups. However, a prior study showed that the prevalence of abortion is two times higher among refugees compared to non-immigrants in Norway. Similarly, a recent study reported that 50% of Somali women in Oslo had unintended childbirth on one occasion or more. These findings are supported by several studies in Europe that showed immigrant and refugee women have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion than Non-immigrant women, and more than half of immigrants, who seek abortion are not using any form of contraception, raising concerns about their access to utilization of modern contraception. However, none of these studies have explored reasons underlying immigrant women’s underutilization of modern contraception. The present study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to contraceptive usage among Somali immigrant women in Oslo area.

Methods

A qualitative study using unstructured in-depth interviews with twenty one Somali women of reproductive age, >18 years, was conducted in Oslo from May—August 2018. The participants were recruited using purposive sampling method. Interviews began with a general question and were followed with some probing questions, and were continued until data saturation was reached. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Although the majority of the participants were educated, aware of the importance of contraceptive methods and interested in child spacing, systemic and socio-cultural barriers were found to be hindering their access to contraception. Several barriers were identified, including: language problems, lack of adequate information, religious beliefs, gender roles and social pressure.

Conclusion

Eliminating the barriers which prevent women from receiving their desired form of contraception will have important public health implications, including lengthening inter-pregnancy intervals, and fewer unplanned pregnancies and abortions. These findings can support policy makers, civil society organizations and health providers to develop cultural sensitive programmes and educational interventions, which help Somali immigrant women overcome the identified barriers to contraception.

Background

Ensuring access to modern contraceptive methods for women is a key to securing not only the health and well-being of women, but also the health and development of communities [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) have recognized that tailored reproductive services are not only critical to improving the health of women, but also a human right. Currently, about 214 million women have an unmet need for modern contraceptives [2]. Over 85 million mistimed or unwanted pregnancies occur each year worldwide, which leads to high rates of induced abortions and maternal morbidity and mortality [3]. The European Action Plan for Sexual and Reproductive Health emphasizes the importance of improving access to contraceptive services of disadvantaged groups, such as immigrants [4]. Nonetheless, studies from Europe suggest that immigrant and refugee women have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion than non-immigrant women [59], raising concerns about their access to quality contraceptive education and healthcare [10, 11]. Unfair differences in access to reproductive health services within and between groups are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as inequity [7].

Research undertaken in Scandinavia suggests that immigrant women seek induced abortion in higher numbers than would be expected given their proportion of the population [8, 11, 12]. A registry-based study in Norway found a pregnancy termination rate of 30.2 per 1000 women per year among refugees compared with a 16.7 per 1000 women per year rate among non-migrants [10]. Another study in Norway found that 25% of women seeking abortion were immigrants from non-Western countries [11]. Immigrant women are vulnerable to unintended pregnancies owing to their limited knowledge about and access to services for contraception and family planning [8, 12, 13]. Furthermore, the underutilization of contraceptives does not only result in unintended pregnancies and abortion, it also restricts women’s ability to achieve educational and economic goals [14]. Reproductive rights include the right of women to decide how many children they want to have, full access to family planning information and services [15]. Facilitating access to contraception for women has the potential benefit of improving maternal health [16] by lowering the annual number of unintended pregnancies.

The Norwegian healthcare system is predominantly public and everyone is entitled to have a general practitioner (GP) who can prescribe contraceptives and insert implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs). There is co-payment for the GP visit, while midwives and nurses can also prescribe contraceptives. Unlike GPs, the visits to midwives and nurses are free of charge. Contraceptive methods are subsidized partly or wholly for women under the age of 22 while older women must pay the full cost of the method. The utilization of reproductive services depends on language proficiency, and comprehension of information received about the health system. Doctor-patient interaction patterns, and language and cultural differences between immigrants and health providers are critical in immigrant’s access to services [17].

An estimated 43,000 Somali immigrants live in Norway, thus constituting the largest non-Western immigrants in the country. Somalia is an East-African country with a population of 12 million and it has the lowest contraceptive prevalence rate in the world of <10% [18]. Understanding and utilization of modern contraceptives is low amongst Somali women, including those who desire to avert pregnancy [19]. Somali women’s fertility rate is 6.4, which exceeds fertility rate in sub-Saharan Africa (5.1) and the world (2.5). This is partly reflected in the high maternal mortality rate of Somalia (732 per 100,000), which is much high than the average in sub-Saharan Africa (84.5 per 100,000) [20]. Total Fertility rate of Somali women in Norway is 4.40 [21], which is much higher than the total fertility rate in Norway of 1.78. Religious misperceptions, cultural factors, and a lack of knowledge regarding modern contraceptives prevent both Somali women and men from accepting and accessing contraceptive health services [22]. Large families are valued in Somali culture, and therefore there is a social pressure for women to bear more children [23].

Somali immigrants may bring their beliefs and attitudes toward contraception with them during migration. For instance, the main reasons for Somali immigrant women in Finland not using contraception were reported to be religious objections and issues related to gender roles [24]. This mirrors the rationale of women in Somalia, where using contraceptives with the intention to limit the number of children is considered to be against Islamic values and Somali traditions [22], further highlighting that the culture of immigrant’s country of origin may shape their contraceptive use regardless of availability of the methods. Nevertheless, cultural traditions, religious misperceptions and social norms are not static but, rather, a dynamic process that changes with the circumstances that surround it [25]. Migration to a new country, exposure to different social context, and improved educational levels can influence traditions and cultural beliefs of individuals, which in turn play a key role in reshaping a community’s norms, behaviors, and values [25].

A number of studies in Norway reported a low utilization of modern contraception among immigrant women [10, 11, 26]. However, none of these studies have explored reasons underlying immigrant women’s underutilization of modern contraception. This study thus, provides the first qualitative study on the barriers and facilitators to modern contraception among Somali immigrant women in Norway.

Methods

Sample and sampling technique

A qualitative study using unstructured in-depth interviews was conducted in Oslo from May to August 2018. Oslo is the capital of Norway, and almost 50% of Somali immigrants in Norway live in the Oslo area. We have chosen unstructured in-depth interviews for this study, because it is not only a flexible tool for exploring people’s experiences and their attitudes of reality, but it is also a tool that does not impose a priori categorization of the questions, which may limit the field of inquiry [33]. Twenty-one Somali women, aged >18; all of them were first-generation immigrants were recruited using purposive sampling technique. Participants were recruited from different social settings and they were selected based on their knowledge on the topic and their connection to Somali community in Oslo area. Norwegian Regional Committee for medical and health research ethics approved the study with approval number: 2017/2386. As some of the participants were illiterate, oral consent were obtained from all participants.

Data collection

The participants were interviewed one on one in Somali language, either at their homes or at a selected place of their choice. Data were collected using an interview guide but questions were asked to women in a convenient way, and the order of the questions varied from interview to interview. The interview started with open-ended questions to collect participants’ demographic characteristics as shown in Table 1. The participants were offered the opportunity to share detailed information of their experiences and opinions about contraception utilization of Somali women [27, 28]. The unstructured interview technique allowed women to go beyond the actual questions and to talk freely about the contraception methods to highlight additional issues of concern, which allowed for the exploration of unanticipated themes. Thus, the participants presented not only their personal experiences but also the experience of their acquaintances and friends. The interview guide covered several themes: (1) community norms and communication regarding family planning (2); knowledge and attitudes toward modern contraceptives (3); reasons for usage or non-usage of modern contraceptives; and (4) factors that prevent Somali women from utilizing modern contraception. Lastly, the acceptable means of increasing access and utilization of contraception were explored through women’s perspectives. The interviews lasted for 45 to 60 minutes. All the interviews were audio-recorded with consent. The second author, who is a Somali ethnic female with extensive experience in qualitative data collection, carried out the interviews, together with the first author. Recruitment and interviews continued until researchers became convinced that no new information was emerging from the additional interviews, that is, when saturation was achieved.

Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.

No. Age Employment Years of living in Norway No. of children
1 37 Employed 15 2
2 28 Job training 11 4
3 34 Job training 10 4
4 42 Employed 28 1
5 35 Employed 19 5
6 46 Employed 26 2
7 44 Unemployed 26 1
8 43 Employed 28 3
9 39 Employed 28 3
10 25 Job training 10 2
11 33 Job training 7 9
12 34 Employed 25 2
13 28 Job training 7 2
14 26 Employed 24 2
15 28 Employed 14 2
16 29 Student 18 3
17 32 Job training 10 4
18 37 Job training 19 2
19 44 Job training 17 10
20 46 Job training 26 6
21 37 Job training 7 4

Analysis

The second author transcribed the interviews verbatim. The transcripts were translated into English for coding, and were carefully read several times by the first and the third authors for accuracy and completeness. Thematic analysis was used to identify and analyze important themes [29]. Themes were identified by bringing together fragments of stories, experiences, and beliefs that are often meaningless when viewed separately [30]. Afterwards, themes that emerged from the women's stories were pieced together to form a comprehensive picture of the participants' shared experience. The themes were divided into categories based on the participants' experience in barriers and facilitators to contraception use. In our previous paper, we presented that nearly 50% of Somali women in Oslo had unintended childbirth on one or more occasions [31], which supports the qualitative findings that are presented in this paper. Thus, the consistency of the findings from the two methods (qualitative and quantitative data) have served to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of the study's results. Furthermore, three study participants who could speak English have read the final paper and verified that what they said is presented correctly.

Results

As shown in Table 1, majority of study participants have been living in Norway for an average (± standard deviation) of 17.9 ± 7.8 years. After the analysis, four main categories emerged from the data. Two of these categories represented barriers to contraception use, while the other two have represented facilitators to contraception use. These categories were summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Themes and subthemes.

Theme Subthemes
Barriers
System related barriers Language
Lack of information
Perceived side-effects of contraception
Cost
Socio-cultural barriers Religion
Social pressure
Husband against contraception use
Facilitators
System based facilitators Information in native language
Increasing multicultural communication skills of health providers
Religious leaders as partners in contraception use
Community based facilitators Learning Norwegian language
Empowerment of women

System related barriers

In this paper, system related barriers refer to users’ inability to access relevant contraceptive information and services mainly due to system related factors.

Lack of Norwegian language skills

Poor knowledge of Norwegian language was identified as a barrier in accessing contraception. One participant narrated her experience with unintended\mistimed pregnancies due to lack of knowledge about the system and the language. Eventually, she decided to use her husband as an interpreter, but the husband was not in favor of contraception. She believes that he concealed the information about contraception from her. This has resulted in unintended pregnancies that could be averted if the women could speak the Norwegian language or if she had known about her rights to a professional interpreter.

I did not receive information about contraception when I needed it most. I have got children that are very closely spaced. I wanted to space them with three years of interval but I never had the correct information of how to do it. I did not know about the existence of modern contraception. I was new to the country and I was at home all the time. I was relying on an information given to me by an interpreter (husband). Maybe he was told about the importance of contraception but he never told me. I received the information too late after having many children but it was still good to have the information, even though it was late (46 years old in job training).

Another participant reported that many Somali women are reluctant to seek information about contraception to their GPs, because they do not speak Norwegian language. They have little trust to health providers. For that, they rely on information they are given by other women, friends and acquaintances.

Women who do not understand the Norwegian language, have fears and doubts about the information they are given by their GPs, instead, they prefer to seek information from people they can communicate with in their native language (44 years old in job training).

Lack of adequate information

Lack of adequate information about contraception is among the widely mentioned barriers to access. Majority of study participants reported that Somali women receive information about contraception when they already have many, closely spaced, children. Some women were reported to have enough information, yet they are against the use of contraception for unaddressed concerns.

Somali women start using contraception when they already have many children up to 6 or more. Many people are new to the country, and they might not have received any information about contraception. (46 years old in job training).

In the absence of appropriate health information about contraception, women receive misleading information from other women, and instead of seeking information from health providers, they are stuck in myths and misperceptions from lay peers, which enforce their doubts and fears of modern contraception.

I have never used contraception. The reason was that my friends used it and they experienced many health problems, which motivated me to stop using it. My friends think that contraception is dangerous to health. The women I know do not like contraception (25 years old in job training).

Perceived side-effects of contraception

Fear about side-effects of contraception such as bleeding, irregular menstruation, cancer and vitamin deficiencies were reported by vast majority of the study participants. In addition, participants reported widespread rumors they hear in their community such as; many Somali women who used contraception and who eventually become infertile, or who have developed dangerous illnesses such as cancer.

If you use contraception for long time, it can reduce the quality of your eggs. Therefore, you may not become pregnant after having used contraception for a long time. (42 years old, employed)

It causes vitamin deficiencies, excessive bleeding, and that motivated me not to use contraception (25 years old in job training).

High cost of contraceptives

According to some participants, high cost of the modern contraception was reported to be a barrier to contraceptive use. Most Somali women do not have paid jobs. Consequently, they may be unable to buy modern contraception, as they have to use their limited income to meet other more important family needs.

In Norway, contraception is available, but it is not cheap; it is available for those who can afford to buy it. I think some women can afford it, but others cannot, depending on their financial situation. (42 years old, employed).

Contraception is, in fact, expensive. I bought it 2500 (Norwegian kroner) ….. Hormonal contraception are expensive to people who do not work (28 years old, in job training).

Socio-cultural barriers

Socio-cultural barriers refer to factors that impede women’s utilization of modern contraceptives for religious believes, social norms, social pressure, husband not in favor of using it and so on.

Religious beliefs not favoring contraceptive use

Some participants believed that their community looks unfavorably upon the use of contraception for religious reasons. Many participants reported that they have asked religious leaders about the use of contraception and they were told not to use contraception but to respect the natural order established by God. According to other participants, the issue of contraception use is a controversial issue among religious leaders, with some rejecting while others accepting the use of contraception. Given the controversial nature of the contraception among religious leaders, the ultimate decision of who to listen and whether to use contraception is left for the women.

A religious leader told me that it is not allowed to take contraception. There are some religious leaders who believe that it is allowed but most of them think it is not allowed. Most known Somali sheikhs like xxx said that contraception is not allowed. (33 years old in job training)

However, some participants were not in favor of this religious view. They presented examples of many Somali families who have problems coping with the needed care of their children. One participant, who was knowledgeable and has faith about Islam has reasoned why women should use contraception. She believes that women will not be punished by Allah for not having children, but Allah will punish for those who do not provide the necessary care for their children. This means that the Islam supports for women to have children that they can manage.

If you have many children that you cannot manage their lives, Allah may punish you for not giving good care to your children. But if you do not become pregnant and not have a single child, Allah will not punish you for not having children (46 years old in job training).

Social pressure to have large family

Cultural norms that support large family size were reported to be upheld by many Somali families in Norway, which serve as deterrent on the use of contraception. According to the participants, women are influenced by the peer pressure to have a large family, and the primary pressure mostly comes from other women and mothers. The peers often have several children, and they intercede when they see that a woman has few children by advising her to have more.

The reason why many women do not use contraception is mainly because of the influence of peers who maintain the social norm of having many children. Women around you will put pressure on you, which pushes you to have many children like them. (46 years old, unemployed).

When everyone around you have many children, there is a pressure on you to have many children like them. I have two children, and people often ask me why I do not have many children early, as my reproductive age is limited and I will soon reach menopause. (46 years old, employed).

Husband’s resistance to contraception

Some participants pointed out that the husbands’ resistance to contraception is a major barrier for women’s contraception use. According to some participants, the husband’s support for contraceptive use is a decisive factor for women’s contraception use. Participants also mentioned that husbands’ desire for large family size and their attitude against contraception use, have prompted many Somali women to break up their marriage. All participants agreed that couples do not discuss the number of children that would be best for their family.

My husband was against contraception. He was very much against; he always wanted more children and he was also against spacing or stopping pregnancies. Finally, I decided to leave my husband and ask for divorce. (35 years old, employed).

My husband was not happy that I should use contraception. I did not inform him that I am going to use contraception because I knew he is against it. He came from a family with many children (46 years old, unemployed).

Some women believe that the husband will abandon them if they do not give birth many children. (46 years old, employed).

System based facilitators

Information in native language

Participants expressed that if the information were given to them in their native language at health centers, it would help increase the contraception uptake. Women who receive information in their own language understand the importance of contraception, and enable them to openly discuss their concerns and fears surrounding contraceptive methods with health professionals. This may clear away all myths and misperceptions surrounding contraception.

Health stations and health centers should employ people who can communicate with women in their own language. If women do not receive information in their native language at the health station, they may rely on fake information from lay people who speak in their language (26 years old, employed).

There are women who think that spiral is made of steel that can harm the body, and they are scared of it. They do not listen to you when you tell them that it is not a sharp thing. They need information from someone they can trust, particularly a health professional (37 years old in job training).

Increasing multicultural communication skills of health providers

Some participants also suggested that health providers should be provided with multicultural communication training that would equip them with necessary skills to build good rapport and trust and understand women with different cultural backgrounds. This training would help in improving providers’ knowledge in provision of tailored information to immigrant women. In addition, employing people like midwives that have multi-cultural competence at health stations would help them gain trust of women.

Women receive information from midwives who are mainly ethnic Norwegian. Some of these women have the perception that Norwegians are against having many children. They do not trust the information provided by the midwives because they think they have different culture regarding reproduction. Women need to receive information from someone they can trust. I think training health providers to increase their competence in multicultural health provision is important (26 years old, employed).

Religious leaders as partners in contraception use

Participants explained the importance of engaging religious leaders in advocacy work for family planning. Many Somali women require go-ahead from religious leaders before they decide to seek contraception advice. The positive role of religious leaders in family planning is reported by participants to be critical in contraceptive use and they can be important facilitators to contraception use.

Some women do not take their decisions regarding contraception until religious leaders approve that decision. It is important for religious leaders to be part of the awareness campaign (28 years old, employed).

Community based facilitators

Learning the language

Participants reported that knowledge about the local language is prerequisite for communication with health providers and it would make it easy for women to seek information about contraception and understand health advices. Some participants stressed the importance of health information about contraception particularly for newly arrived women. This is because participants believe that women are more vulnerable to unintended pregnancies in the first few years after arrival before they learn the language.

Before I have learned the language, I was very scared and suspicious and I had no trust in the information I was given. When I learned the language, I started asking for information about contraception from the midwives. (46 years old in job training).

Empowering women

Majority of the study participants emphasized the importance of empowering women and making them aware of risks related to pregnancy and short birth space intervals. According to participants, women should be empowered to be the ultimate decision-makers about their health and wellbeing including their reproduction rights.

I think women, should be more conscious, to the problems that they may experience if they give birth closely spaced children. Men want many children because they do not go through the pain and difficulties associated with child bearing and care. (46 years old, unemployed)

Discussion

This study explored barriers and facilitators to contraception use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo, Norway. The study found that Somali women in Norway do not have their contraceptive needs met. System-related barriers, including the lack of appropriate information about the safety and accessibility of modern contraception, were among the barriers to contraceptive use. This finding may explain why immigrant and refugee women in Europe have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion than non-immigrant women [59]. Many Somali women are skeptical about the modern contraception, which they associate with cancer, vitamin deficiency and infertility. This skepticism can be considered a direct consequence of a lack of appropriate information about modern contraception. Information provision requires a cultural understanding between immigrant women and health providers, with a culturally competent interpreter in place. Moreover, it may not be easy for many Somali women to discuss contraception and sexual health with a male doctor or through a male interpreter [32], which may limit their ability to discuss all their concerns with the male provider, and this compromises their right to take informed decisions. Training health providers for provision of appropriate and culturally tailored information about contraceptives is required to increase the contraception uptake of Somali immigrant women.

The study shows socio-cultural barriers mainly religious misperceptions that influence the decision of many Somali women in Norway to use contraception. This finding is in-line with prior finding among Muslim women in Africa whereby 66% of women’s decisions toward contraception is influenced by religion [33]. In Norway, this finding is unexpected given the fact that Somali immigrant women interact with many other Muslim communities that are knowledgeable about Islam and its position in family planning. Predominantly oral society, there are plenty of religious myths that thrive amongst them. For example, Somalis believe that female genital mutilation (FGM) is obligated by Islam, while many Muslim communities in Norway are not only totally unfamiliar with the practice, but also considered it un-Islamic. A study in USA found very low uptake of contraceptives among Somali women which was associated with religious beliefs [34]. However, in most Muslim countries, Imams support the use of modern contraception [35]. A study in Nigeria found that the exposure to family planning messages from religious leaders increased modern contraceptive use among Muslim women [33]. Campaigns against FGM in Norway have long used religious leaders as agent of change, which led to attitude change toward the practice among Somali immigrants [36]. Given the influential positions of religious leaders, the strategies to increase contraceptive uptake should engage religious leaders in advocacy work.

In this study, male partner’s resistance to family planning was another hurdle to contraception use. Participants of this study reported that there is a concern among women that if a woman fail to reproduce as many children as her husband wants, the husband is likely to abandon her to another woman who is willing to meet his fertility demand. A study in Tanzania reported that women using contraception against the wishes of the husbands could lead to violence or divorce of the woman [37], which support the Somali women’s concern. Our earlier quantitative study found that 20% of Somali women in Oslo have never discussed contraception with their husbands [31]. In a study on FGM amongst Somalis in Sweden asking men and women separately about potential perpetrators of FGM, men claimed that the practice is encouraged by women while women reported the contrary; after being brought together to discuss the issue and it became clear they had never discussed the issue. Similar situation may be true that Somali women and men do not discuss the contraception use; women may believe that men would not allow contraception use, while otherwise could be true with men. Nonetheless, Somalis are patriarchal society where men determines most of the family issues. A prior study of Somali women in Finland argued that if Somali men were educated about the importance of family planning, there might be a transformation of values and perceptions about birth control [24]. In sub-Saharan African, the majority of women considered modern contraception acceptable, but they require the permission of their partners before they actually adopted a modern method [38]. Consistent with this, a participant in our study suggested that there are many Somali women in Norway whose personal conviction is insufficient to ensure the uptake of modern contraceptive methods. Male involvement in family planning can increase uptake and continuation of contraceptive use by improving spousal communication [24, 38]. Therefore, any intervention to increase contraception use among Somali women in Oslo should educate women and men equally about family planning, and promote partner communication regarding contraceptive methods.

Participants have presented their views about facilitators to contraception use including participation of religious leaders in awareness creation campaigns. Many Somali women perceive contraception as against their religious teaching. This could be because some prominent Somali Imams speak against modern contraception. Contrastingly, in Arabic speaking Muslim countries such as Jordan, 82% of male religious leaders and 98% of female religious leaders believe that Islam encourages family planning [35]. Similarly, Muslim nations have actively engaged Islamic scholars to advocate for maternal and child health, including modern contraception [39, 40]. Study participants suggested that awareness campaigns aimed to change the perception of Somali immigrant women and men towards contraception should engage religious leaders in awareness programs. This engagement should go hand in hand with building capacity to enhance religious leaders’ knowledge on family planning methods.

Finally, participants think that empowering Somali women in decision making and autonomy for the decisions affecting their health and wellbeing is the most important factor affecting their contraceptive use. Women’s empowerment is defined as ‘the expansion of people’s ability to make strategic life choices in a context where this ability was previously denied to them’ [41] which is an important aspect affecting family planning and reproductive health outcomes of women. Empowering women through essential resources such as education and employment was associated with lower fertility, longer birth intervals and lower rates of unintended pregnancy [42]. While improving reproductive health rights of women is receiving growing attention in Norway [16], the barriers to contraception that Somali immigrant women experience are similar to barriers reported among women in different parts of Africa. Norwegian government efforts to promote reproductive health and rights of women should ensure that women’s individual resources such as education and employment are strengthened. Such efforts should enable women to make an informed contraceptive choice, which is consistent with their personal values, needs and beliefs.

This study had several limitations. The purposeful selection of study sample does not ensure that these populations were in fact representative of all Somali women in Norway. Moreover, study participants were women who have lived in Norway for a mean 17 years. Therefore, newly arrived women might have experienced different barriers that are not mentioned here. However, there are studies that investigated barriers to contraceptives among the Somali community, both in Somalia [22] and Somali immigrants in the West, which found similar results [43]. Despite these limitations, the result of this study contribute to the existing body of knowledge on utilization of contraception services among immigrant communities in Western countries. The findings demonstrate that, despite the availability and the equal access of contraceptive methods to all women in Norway, predominantly socio-cultural barriers impede Somali women’s contraceptive usage. The study findings underline that the availability of contraceptive methods in isolation is insufficient to ensure uptake amongst immigrant Somali women. Socio-cultural factors, such as the social pressure of having many children, men’s attitude toward contraception and religious misperceptions toward modern contraceptives, must be addressed.

Conclusion

Family planning is affected by many factors operating at the level of the individual, family, peer group, community, institution, and policy environment. Eliminating the barriers preventing immigrant women from receiving modern contraception has important public health implications, including decreasing unplanned pregnancies and induced abortions. Participants had a good understanding of the importance of contraceptive methods for the health of the mother and the child. Although the majority had good knowledge of modern contraception and had experienced using it, they made it clear that Somali women face barriers to access. In order to successfully meet women's modern contraceptive needs, policy makers, health providers and civil society organizations should consider the barriers, and implement the facilitators reported by this study. Steps that we suggest include: the provision of appropriate health information on contraception to women, especially in early years of their arrival in the country; subsidy on contraceptive methods; encouraging partner communication in family planning; training health providers to improve their multicultural competence; and engaging religious leaders in advocacy work. Moreover, broader research is recommended that assesses the barriers at each level (individual, family, peer group, community, institutional, and the policy environment) to determine which interventions are best suited to increase Somali immigrant women’s contraception use. While health providers and policy makers should address system related barriers, civil society and community organizations should promote women’s empowerment and encourage partner’s discussion on family planning to counteract community based barriers. Further, given the influential positions of religious leaders, the strategies to increase contraceptive uptake should engage religious leaders in advocacy work. Finally, women’s low level of decision making power within families is a major barrier in contraception utilization affecting the health and development of immigrant women and thus, it should be addressed through multiple fronts.

Acknowledgments

We thank Norwegian Women’s Public Health Association who owns the project, and Vera Minja for helping research team on administrative work. We also thank Bernadette Kumar and Berit Austveg for commenting the study proposal.

List of abbreviations

WHO

World Health Organization

UN

United Nations

Data Availability

There are legal restrictions on sharing the de-identified data set, as sharing data require approval by Norwegian Regional Committee for medical and health research ethics (REK). Data is available on request from 'Unit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health', via this email; folkehelseinstituttet@fhi.no. Data set name is: Contra. The provision of the data should be approved by REK. They can be contacted via: post@helseforskning.etikkom.no

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Norwegian Extrastiftelsen The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Family planning/Contraception. 2018. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/.
  • 2.World Health Organization. 2018. Unmet need for family planning. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/family_planning/unmet_need_fp/en/ Retrieved on 22.2.2018.
  • 3.The WHO’s original source is Guttmacher Institute, Adding It Up: The Costs and Benefits of Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health, fact sheet, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2017, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adding-it-up-contraception-mnh-2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Action Plan for Sexual and Reproductive Health: Towards achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Europe–leaving no one behind. WHO, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raben LAD, van den Muijsenbergh M. Inequity in contraceptive care between refugees and other migrant women?: a retrospective study in Dutch general practice. Family practice. 2018. Epub 2018/01/20. 10.1093/fampra/cmx133 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bruckner TA, Mortensen LH, Catalano RA. Social and demographic drivers of trend and seasonality in elective abortions in Denmark. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):214 Epub 2017/07/06. 10.1186/s12884-017-1397-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leeners B, Bieli S, Huang D, Tschudin S. Why prevention of repeat abortion is so challenging: psychosocial characteristics of women at risk. The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care: the official journal of the European Society of Contraception. 2017;22(1):38–44. Epub 2016/12/03. 10.1080/13625187.2016.1258053 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Helstrom L, Odlind V, Zatterstrom C, Johansson M, Granath F, Correia N, et al. Abortion rate and contraceptive practices in immigrant and native women in Sweden. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2003;31(6):405–10. Epub 2003/12/17. 10.1080/14034940210165181 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rasch V, Knudsen LB, Gammeltoft T, Christensen JT, Erenbjerg M, Christensen JJ, et al. Contraceptive attitudes and contraceptive failure among women requesting induced abortion in Denmark. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2007;22(5):1320–6. Epub 2007/02/14. 10.1093/humrep/dem012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vangen S, Eskild A, Forsend L. Termination of pregnancy according to immigration status: a population-based registry linkage study. An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2008; 115 (10) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eskild A, Helgadottir LB, Jerve F, Qvigstad E, Stray-Pedersen S, Loset A. [Induced abortion among women with foreign cultural background in Oslo]. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2002;122(14):1355–7. Epub 2002/07/09. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rasch V, Gammeltoft T, Knudsen LB, Tobiassen C, Ginzel A, Kempf L. Induced abortion in Denmark: effect of socio-economic situation and country of birth. European journal of public health. 2008;18(2):144–9. Epub 2007/12/11. 10.1093/eurpub/ckm112 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Bankole A. Legal abortion worldwide in 2008: levels and recent trends. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2011;43(3):188–98. Epub 2011/09/03. 10.1363/4318811 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.United Nations Population Fund. Key issues in reproductive health services. New York, NY: United Nations Population Fund; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Action Plan for Sexual and Reproductive Health: Towards achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in Europe–leaving no one behind. WHO, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Action Plan for Women’s Rights and Gender Equality in Foreign and Development Policy 2016–2020. 2016. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/departementene/ud/vedlegg/fn/womens_rights.pdf.
  • 17.Smaland Goth UG, Berg JE. Migrant participation in Norwegian health care. A qualitative study using key informants. The European journal of general practice. 2011;17(1):28–33. Epub 2010/11/04. 10.3109/13814788.2010.525632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gure F, Yusuf M, Foster AM. Exploring Somali women's reproductive health knowledge and experiences: results from focus group discussions in Mogadishu. Reproductive health matters. 2015;23(46):136–44. Epub 2016/01/01. 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.11.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gure F, Dahir MK, Yusuf M, Foster AM. Emergency Contraception in Post-Conflict Somalia: An Assessment of Awareness and Perceptions of Need. Studies in family planning. 2016;47(1):69–81. Epub 2016/03/31. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2016.00047.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bongaarts J, Bruce J. The causes of unmet need for contraception and the social content of services. Studies in family planning. 1995;26(2):57–75. Epub 1995/03/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Montaner JSG, Hogg R, Wood E, et al. The case for expanding access to highly active antiretroviral therapy to curb the growth of the HIV epidemic. Lancet. 2006;368:531–6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69162-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Egeh AA, Dugsieh O, Erlandsson K, Osman F. The views of Somali religious leaders on birth spacing—A qualitative study. Sexual & reproductive healthcare: official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives. 2019;20:27–31. Epub 2019/05/16. 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.02.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chukwumalu K, Gallagher MC, Baunach S, Cannon A. Uptake of postabortion care services and acceptance of postabortion contraception in Puntland, Somalia. Reproductive health matters. 2017;25(51):48–57. Epub 2017/12/13. 10.1080/09688080.2017.1402670 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Degni F, Koivusilta L, Ojanlatva A. Attitudes towards and perceptions about contraceptive use among married refugee women of Somali descent living in Finland. The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care: the official journal of the European Society of Contraception. 2006;11(3):190–6. Epub 2006/10/24. 10.1080/13625180600557605 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lane SD, Rubinstein RA. Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries. The Hastings Center report. 1996;26(3):31–40. Epub 1996/05/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Omland G, Ruths S, Diaz E. Use of hormonal contraceptives among immigrant and native women in Norway: data from the Norwegian Prescription Database. BJOG. 2014. September; 121(10): 1221–1228. Published online 2014 Jun 16. 10.1111/1471-0528.12906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ritchie J LJ. Qualitative Research Pratice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers London: SAGE Publications; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kvale Steinar and Brinkmann Sverd. Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications, Inc; 2nd edition; July 16, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Leininger M. Ethnography and ethnonursing: models and modes of qualitative data analysis In: Leininger M, editor. Qualitative Research Methods in Nursing. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton; 1985. p. 33. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gele AA, Musse FK, Qureshi S. Unmet needs for contraception: A comparative study among Somali immigrant women in Oslo and their original population in Mogadishu, Somalia. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(8): e0220783 10.1371/journal.pone.0220783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gele AA, Qureshi SA, Kour P, Kumar B, Diaz E. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among Pakistani and Somali immigrant women in Oslo: a qualitative study. International journal of women's health. 2017;9:487–96. Epub 2017/07/26. 10.2147/IJWH.S139160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adedini SA, Babalola S, Ibeawuchi C, Omotoso O, Akiode A, Odeku M. Role of Religious Leaders in Promoting Contraceptive Use in Nigeria: Evidence From the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative. Global health, science and practice. 2018;6(3):500–14. Epub 2018/10/06. 10.9745/ghsp-d-18-00135 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Comerasamy H, Read B, Francis C, Cullings S, Gordon H. The acceptability and use of contraception: a prospective study of Somalian women's attitude. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;23(4):412–5. Epub 2003/07/26. 10.1080/01443610310001209342 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Underwood Carol. Islamic Precepts and Family Planning: The Perceptions Of Jordanian Religious Leaders and Their Constituents: International Family Planning Perspectives, 2000, 26(3):110–117 [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gele AA, Kumar B, Hjelde KH, Sundby J. Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study. International journal of women's health. 2012;4:7–17. Epub 2012/02/09. 10.2147/IJWH.S27577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schuler S. R., Rottach E., & Mukiri P. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: a qualitative study. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 2011; 2(2), 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vouking Z. M., Evina C. D., and Tadenfok C. N. “Male Involvement in Family Planning Decision Making in Sub-Saharan Africa–What the Evidence Suggests.” The Pan African Medical Journal. 2014, 19: 349 10.11604/pamj.2014.19.349.5090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zafarullah AN, Humble ME. Determinants of oral contraceptive pill use and its discontinuation among rural women in Bangladesh. Reproductive Medicine & Biology 2006;5:111–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huber D, Saeedi N, amadi AK. Achieving success with family planning in rural Afghanistan. Bulletin of World Health Organization 2010;88:227–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kabeer N. Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment: Theory and Practice Discussing women’s empowerment: Theory and Practice. Novum Grafiska, AB; Stockholm: 2001b. http://www.sida.se/contentassets/5e45d330e16743179cefc93de34e71ac/discussing-womens-empowerment-theory-and-practice_1626.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Upadhyay UD, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Ciaraldi EJ, Fraser A, et al. Women’s empowerment and fertility: a review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;115:111–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Akerman E, Larsson EC, Essen B, Westerling R. A missed opportunity? Lack of knowledge about sexual and reproductive health services among immigrant women in Sweden. Sexual & reproductive healthcare: official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives. 2019;19:64–70. Epub 2019/04/01. 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.12.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh

29 Oct 2019

PONE-D-19-23365

Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Gele,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Dec 13 2019 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh, MD, MSc, DrPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1.

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please amend your current ethics statement to address the following concerns: Please explain why was written consent was not obtained, how you recorded/documented participant consent, and if the ethics committees/IRBs approved this consent procedure.

3. Note from Associate Editor Nancy Beam (nbeam@plos.org): PLOS ONE considers qualitative and mixed-methods studies for publication. We recommend that authors use the COREQ checklist, or other relevant checklists listed by the Equator Network, such as the SRQR, to ensure complete reporting (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-qualitative-research).

In general, we would expect qualitative studies to include the following: 1) defined objectives or research questions; 2) description of the sampling strategy, including rationale for the recruitment method, participant inclusion/exclusion criteria and the number of participants recruited; 3) detailed reporting of the data collection procedures; 4) data analysis procedures described in sufficient detail to enable replication; 5) a discussion of potential sources of bias; and 6) a discussion of limitations.  In your role as Academic Editor, we appreciate your consideration of whether the manuscript meets reporting standards in the field, in addition to the journal’s other publication criteria (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication). Please feel free to email me to discuss the work further.

4. 

We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

5. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please address comments provided by the reviewer.

Also, though socio-demographics of respondents were added to the appendices, please add some relevant information to the participants' details in the narrative section instead of just participant 1, etc.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title: Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

Version Date: 15th September, 2019

Reviewer: Dr. Evelyn Sakeah

Reviewer’s Report:

This manuscript addresses barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women. The topic is of great importance in global health.

Abstract

1. State the statistics of unintended pregnancy and abortion among immigrant

Women

2. In what format did the interviews take: IDIs or FGDs or both?

Introduction

1. Why should I take your results as new and useful? Have similar studies be conducted in the study country? Justify why it was necessary for the study to be conducted-show the gaps the authors filled in this research.

Methods

1. Describe the study site

2. State interviewing technique: IDIs or FGD or both?

The paper would be much clearer if the following comments are addressed

a. How many FGDs or IDIs were conducted?

b. How many participants took part in each FGD or IDI?

b. What was the average duration of the FGDs or IDIs?

3. Study design should be clearly stated from the beginning. What do the authors mean by this statement: “We employed a qualitative and quantitative design in this study, and the consistency of the findings from the two methods (interviews and quantitative data)”

4. Under Methods and materials, show study site; study design , sample and sampling and then the training of fieldworkers

5. Would suggest you include under "Methodology" section, the "theory that guided this study" and "methodology" of the study then adding the "methods of data collection".

Training and data collection

1. Indicate the training given to interviewers and how long the training was conducted

2. Please also make clear whether key terms were translated into local languages to harmonize data collection between interviewers. Also, were the interviews audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for analysis?

3. Did interviewers review transcriptions for accuracy and completeness and corrected classification by questions to facilitate the work of the coding by theme? If these were done the authors should clearly state this in the methods section.

Sample and Sampling technique

1. Indicate the sample and show the category of people interviewed

Analysis

“We employed a qualitative and quantitative design in this study, and the consistency of the findings from the two methods (interviews and quantitative data) have served to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of the study's results.”

1. This is purely a qualitative study, why then you employ a quantitative design as well.

Results

1. Please be consistent- you either use “participant “or “pt” in your quotations.

2. It would have been good for authors to add the ages of the participants in the quotations. That would help readers understand the perspectives of the younger participants as against the older ones.

Discussion

1. Please rewrite the opening paragraph of the discussion by stating clearly the summary of the research findings

2. Statements like this should be put in the recommendation section: “Given the influential positions of religious leaders, the strategies to increase contraceptive uptake should engage religious leaders in advocacy work.”

Quality of Written English:

1. Suitable for publication with minor editing

Ethical Approval

1. Please add some more information on the processes related to the "ethical considerations", also add the IRB approval numbers to the text.

Limitations

1. Indicate the weaknesses of the study.

2. How did the authors prevent subjectivity in the conduct of this study?

Data Availability

1. Authors did not declare data availability

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: None

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Recviewers Comments.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229916.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


11 Nov 2019

Title: Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

Version Date: 15th September, 2019

Reviewer: Dr. Evelyn Sakeah

Reviewer’s Report:

This manuscript addresses barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women. The topic is of great importance in global health.

Abstract

1. State the statistics of unintended pregnancy and abortion among immigrant

Women

Thanks to the reviewer for important comments. Done. Look the abstract, background section, from line 3 to 6

2. In what format did the interviews take: IDIs or FGDs or both?

The study used unstructured in-depth interview. Done, look the abstract, methods section, first line

3. Introduction

1. Why should I take your results as new and useful? Have similar studies be conducted in the study country? Justify why it was necessary for the study to be conducted-show the gaps the authors filled in this research. Such study has never been done in Norway

Done, the final paragraph of the Introduction section

Methods

1. Describe the study site

Done. Look the methods section, first paragraph, line 1-3

2. State interviewing technique: IDIs or FGD or both?

The study used unstructured interview. Look the methods section, from 3-6

The paper would be much clearer if the following comments are addressed

a. How many FGDs or IDIs were conducted?

The study used un-structured interviews involving 21 interviews. Look the methods section, from line 6-7

b. How many participants took part in each FGD or IDI?

The study used un-structured in-depth interviews involving 21 interviews. Look the methods section, from line 6-7. There was no FGDs.

b. What was the average duration of the FGDs or IDIs?

The interviews lasted from 45-60 minutes. Done, look methods section, 2nd paragraph, line 17-18

3. Study design should be clearly stated from the beginning.

Done, look the methods section, first paragraph

What do the authors mean by this statement: “We employed a qualitative and quantitative design in this study, and the consistency of the findings from the two methods (interviews and quantitative data)”

This study is a part of a broad project that used quantitative and qualitative design. The statement is now rephrased.

4. Under Methods and materials, show study site; study design , sample and sampling and then the training of fieldworkers

Done. Data was collected by experienced researchers, therefore, fieldworkers were not used; thus, no training was provided.

5. Would suggest you include under "Methodology" section, the "methodology" of the study then adding the "methods of data collection".

Done. Look the methodology section. We organized it as ‘ Sample and Sampling technique, Data collection, and Analysis’ as suggested by the reviewer.

Training and data collection

1. Indicate the training given to interviewers and how long the training was conducted

Data were collected by experienced researchers; first and second author, both are native Somali speakers; Somali language was also the native language of all study participants.

2. Please also make clear whether key terms were translated into local languages to harmonize data collection between interviewers. Also, were the interviews audio recorded,

The interviews were conducted in Somali, which was the native language of both researchers and participants. Yes, interviews were audio recorded. Look methods section, line 18-19

3. Transcribed and translated into English for analysis?

Yes. Look the analysis, line 1-2

4. Did interviewers review transcriptions for accuracy and completeness and corrected classification by questions to facilitate the work of the coding by theme?

Yes, that was the case. Look the analysis section, line 2-3

Sample and Sampling technique

1. Indicate the sample and show the category of people interviewed

Done. Look at the Methods section, first paragraph, line 5-6

Analysis

“We employed a qualitative and quantitative design in this study, and the consistency of the findings from the two methods (interviews and quantitative data) have served to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of the study's results.”

1. This is purely a qualitative study, why then you employ a quantitative design as well.

Thanks for taking this into our attention. Yes, this study is a qualitative, but we did a quantitative part as well, which was published earlier in this journal. We clarified the statement more clearly in the paper. Look analysis section, line 9-10

Results

1. Please be consistent- you either use “participant “or “pt” in your quotations.

Corrected. We changed them to ‘participants’

2. It would have been good for authors to add the ages of the participants in the quotations. That would help readers understand the perspectives of the younger participants as against the older ones.

As participants were only 21 persons, we couldn’t add the age in the quotations, for fear that, with age in the quotation, some participants may become identifiable. The age of the participants are shown in table two.

Discussion

1. Please rewrite the opening paragraph of the discussion by stating clearly the summary of the research findings

Done. Look the discussion section, line 1-5

2. Statements like the one below should be put in the conclusion/ recommendation section:

“Given the influential positions of religious leaders, the strategies to increase contraceptive uptake should engage religious leaders in advocacy work.”

Thanks for the very important suggestion. Done, look the conclusion section. Line 18-19

Quality of Written English:

1. Suitable for publication with minor editing

Thanks, the language was crosschecked and edited where necessary.

Ethical Approval

1. Please add some more information on the processes related to the "ethical considerations", also add the IRB approval numbers to the text.

Done. Look the ethical approval section

Limitations

1. Indicate the weaknesses of the study.

Look the discussion section, final paragraph

2. How did the authors prevent subjectivity in the conduct of this study?

To avoid biases, we have employed two important steps:

1- We used three researchers to code the data.

2- We allowed three members from the participants to review the results and verify that what they said was stated correctly.

This was clearly mentioned in the last two lines of the ‘analysis section’

Data Availability

1. Authors did not declare data availability

There are legal restrictions on sharing the de-identified data set, as sharing data require approval by Norwegian Regional Committee for medical and health research ethics (REK). Data is available on request from Norwegian Institute of Public Health, but the provision of the data should be approved by REK. They can be contacted via: post@helseforskning.etikkom.no

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh

8 Jan 2020

PONE-D-19-23365R1

Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

PLOS ONE

Dear Abdi Gele,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Feb 22 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh, MD, MSc, DrPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Nice effort addressing issues raised by reviewer... there are a few more things to add that emerged post the first review. NB: In your subsequent publications, please number each of the lines to make it easier for reviewers to make references to portions of your work...

1. Line 6, page 2 - expression should be "these findings" not "these finding"

2. Line 12, page 4 - expression should be "in unintended pregnancies"

3. Last but one line on page 4 - expression "and they" should have been "that". Also, it is not clear if it is "the visit" that is free or "the contraceptives"? it does not come out clearly...

4. Line 1, page 6 - This "is" mirrors - "is" should be deleted...

5. Line 7, page 8 - until researchers "become" - "become" should be in the past tense

6. Last but one and last lines of page 9 - "the findings from a quantitative part of this study" - it would be great to clarify which findings these are...

7. Lines 2 - 6 under results on page 10 - could you elaborate a bit on the basis upon which these conclusions were made

8. Pages 10 and 11- It will be good you provide an overview of what is meant by "system related or system based barriers or facilitators" and "socio-cultural or community based facilitators or barriers". Also I am not sure why "perceived side-effects" and "religious leaders as partners" would be "system related". it will be great you clarify how you arrived at those assumptions.

9. Describing participants whose quotes were used. It is necessary to provide some information on your participants. A reader will not be running up and down your manuscript to be referring to such details elsewhere...You could present "Participant 20"as "46 year old mother in job"training" and "Participant 19" as "44 year old mother in job-training" .... please do it similarly for other quotes...

10. For each of the "sub-themes", provide "self explanatory statements". E.g. "Cost" on page 14 could be something like "High cost of contraceptives"... "religion" e.g. "religious beliefs not favoring contraceptive use"... do that for the other sub-themes and themes. Also the finding "high cost of contraception was reported..." on page 14 seems to conflict with information you provided in the background - so please address this disparity in your discussions.

11. Page 14 - the statement "One participant, who was knowledgeable about Islam has reasoned why women should plan their pregnancies" is not clear, so some revision will help

12. Page 17 - define or describe what you refer to as "multicultural communication"

13. Page 24 - the statement "there are number of studies in this community either in Africa [22] or among immigrants in the West" is not clear, so revise

14. Revise the following in the REFERENCE SECTION: numbers 10, 28, 35, 37, 38, and check if there are others that do not conform to the requirements of the journal

15. There are still a few grammatical errors here and there.... please do a "thorough sweep-through" to ensure you clear them all...

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The article is well written and all comments have been addressed. The only concern is their unpreparedness to make the data available. However, they provided an explanation to that.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Evelyn Sakeah

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229916.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


21 Jan 2020

Response to editor’s comments

1. Line 6, page 2 - expression should be "these findings" not "these finding"

Done line 7, page 2

2. Line 12, page 4 - expression should be "in unintended pregnancies"

Done line 12, page 4

3. Last but one line on page 4 - expression "and they" should have been "that". Also, it is not clear if it is "the visit" that is free or "the contraceptives"? it does not come out clearly...

Done, page 4, line 23

4. Line 1, page 6 - This "is" mirrors - "is" should be deleted...

Done, page 6, line 1

5. Line 7, page 8 - until researchers "become" - "become" should be in the past tense

Done, page 8, line 7.

6. Last but one and last lines of page 9 - "the findings from a quantitative part of this study" - it would be great to clarify which findings these are...

Done, page 9, line 21 to page 10, line 2.

7. Lines 2 - 6 under results on page 10 - could you elaborate a bit on the basis upon which these conclusions were made

The statement was removed as we found it not fitting well there.

8. Pages 10 and 11- It will be good you provide an overview of what is meant by "system related or system based barriers or facilitators" and "socio-cultural or community based facilitators or barriers".

Done. Short clarification of the terms (socio-cultural and system based) was added. Look page 11, line 4-5, and page 14, line 16-18

Also I am not sure why "perceived side-effects" and "religious leaders as partners" would be "system related". it will be great you clarify how you arrived at those assumptions.

Perceived side effect and the resultant fear of contraceptives are basically due to lack of appropriate information about contraceptives. Provision of relevant information to immigrants is the responsibility of the health system providers. Similarly, we placed ‘religious leaders as partners’ within the system related facilitators. In Norway, religious leaders are included in health awareness campaigns such as elimination of Female Genital Mutilation. Also, different municipalities provide fund to civil society organizations to prevent forced marriage and other social norms, and municipalities often encourage inclusion of religious leaders in the awareness efforts. For that, they are part of the preventive health system and in this paper, we think that their advocacy regarding promotion of contraception use will help immigrant women accept modern contraceptive methods

9. Describing participants whose quotes were used. It is necessary to provide some information on your participants. A reader will not be running up and down your manuscript to be referring to such details elsewhere...You could present "Participant 20"as "46 year old mother in job"training" and "Participant 19" as "44 year old mother in job-training" .... please do it similarly for other quotes...

Done. Throughout the paper

10. For each of the "sub-themes", provide "self explanatory statements". E.g. "Cost" on page 14 could be something like "High cost of contraceptives"... "religion" e.g. "religious beliefs not favoring contraceptive use"... do that for the other sub-themes and themes. Also the finding "high cost of contraception was reported..." on page 14 seems to conflict with information you provided in the background - so please address this disparity in your discussions.

Done. It was mainly based on misinformation of the participant, and we removed it to eliminate misunderstandings.

11. Page 14 - the statement "One participant, who was knowledgeable about Islam has reasoned why women should plan their pregnancies" is not clear, so some revision will help

Done. page 15, line 11-12

12. Page 17 - define or describe what you refer to as "multicultural communication"

Done. Page 18, line 2-5

13. Page 24 - the statement "there are number of studies in this community either in Africa [22] or among immigrants in the West" is not clear, so revise

Done. Page 24, line 11-15

14. Revise the following in the REFERENCE SECTION: numbers 10, 28, 35, 37, 38, and check if there are others that do not conform to the requirements of the journal

Done. We checked all references and corrected where necessary.

15. There are still a few grammatical errors here and there.... please do a "thorough sweep-through" to ensure you clear them all...

Done. Proof-reading by native speaker was done.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to editor.docx

Decision Letter 2

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh

19 Feb 2020

Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

PONE-D-19-23365R2

Dear Dr. Abdi A Gele,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh, MD, MSc, DrPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Admire the step by step approach to changes and reporting them also as such. Thank you.

Most of the issues have been addressed. The issues raised with the references are still outstanding though.

Page 11, line 5 would better read ".... mainly due to health system related factors"

Page 14, line 16 would better read "... women's utilization of contraceptives such as religious beliefs...."

Congratulations on the effort...

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh

24 Feb 2020

PONE-D-19-23365R2

Barriers and facilitators to contraceptive use among Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study

Dear Dr. Gele:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Yeetey Akpe Kwesi Enuameh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Recviewers Comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to editor.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    There are legal restrictions on sharing the de-identified data set, as sharing data require approval by Norwegian Regional Committee for medical and health research ethics (REK). Data is available on request from 'Unit for Migration and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health', via this email; folkehelseinstituttet@fhi.no. Data set name is: Contra. The provision of the data should be approved by REK. They can be contacted via: post@helseforskning.etikkom.no


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES