Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Gen Virol. 2018 Jul 5;99(9):1248–1252. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001113

Confirmation of Zika virus infection through hospital-based sentinel surveillance of acute febrile illness in Uganda, 2014–2017

John Timothy Kayiwa 1,*, Annet Martha Nankya 1, Irene Joyce Ataliba 1, Eric C Mossel 2, Mary B Crabtree 2, Julius Julian Lutwama 1
PMCID: PMC7064273  NIHMSID: NIHMS1004777  PMID: 29975185

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV), transmitted by Aedes species mosquitoes, was first isolated in Uganda in 1947. From February 2014 to October 2017, the Uganda Virus Research Institute, in collaboration with the US Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, conducted arbovirus surveillance in acute febrile illness (AFI) patients at St Francis hospital in Nkonkonjeru. Three hundred and eighty-four serum samples were collected and tested for IgM antibodies to yellow fever virus (YFV), West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and ZIKV. Of the 384 samples, 5 were positive for ZIKV IgM. Of these five, three were confirmed by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) to be ZIKV infections. Of the remaining two, one was determined to be a non-specific flavivirus infection and one was confirmed to be alphavirus-positive by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This study provides the first evidence of laboratory-confirmed ZIKV infection in Uganda in five decades, and emphasizes the need to enhance sentinel surveillance.

Keywords: Arbovirus, Zika virus, hospital-based, sentinel surveillance, plaque reduction neutralization test, confirmation


Zika virus (ZIKV), family Flaviviridae, genus flavivirus, is transmitted by Aedes species mosquitoes, including Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus [1]. ZIKV was first isolated in Uganda from a rhesus monkey in 1947 [2], and a short time later was first identified in humans in Nigeria [3]. Only a few human cases of ZIKV infection were reported before the 21st century [49], when in 2007 a large outbreak occurred on the island of Yap [10]. In 2016, a widespread outbreak occurred in South America, marking the first time the virus was known to be transmitted in the Americas [1113] and resulting in microcephaly in newborns [14], Guillain–Barré syndrome [15] and viral meningoencephalitis [16]. Sexual transmission has also been reported for ZIKV infections [17]. Because of its global distribution and ability to cause birth defects, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the ZIKV epidemic in the Americas to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in 2016 [18].

Studies have reported Uganda as a hotspot for many viral infections [19, 20], and recent studies reported the presence of ZIKV transmission-competent mosquito vectors throughout Uganda [2123], a nation with environmental conditions conducive to the spread of arboviruses, including ZIKV. Here we report serological evidence of ZIKV infection in patients presenting with acute febrile illness (AFI) in a health facility in central Uganda. This study was facilitated through the arbovirus surveillance programme at the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI), in collaboration with the Division of Vector-Borne Diseases (DVBD) of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The Department of Arbovirology, Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases at UVRI established sentinel hospital-based surveillance to obtain clinical public health data concerning the causes of acute febrile illness (AFI) throughout the year. All patients enrolled in the study had a documented temperature of ≥37.5 °C or a reported history of fever without an identified source that had persisted for 2–7 days. Other symptoms included headache, chills, or muscle and joint pains. Serum samples were collected from patients at the St Francis Hospital Nkokonjeru sentinel site (Nkokonjeru sentinel site, 0°14 22.0 N, 32° 55 23.0 E; 50 kilometres southeast of Kampala). Samples were collected from February 2014 to October 2017, stored frozen in liquid nitrogen tanks and shipped monthly to the Arbovirology Laboratory at the UVRI in Entebbe. At the UVRI, samples were divided into three aliquots, one each for serological testing, virus isolation and storage.

A total of 384 serum samples were collected and stored as described above. Heat-inactivated sera were tested for IgM antibodies using the CDC immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CDC MAC-ELISA) [24] for ZIKV and YFV and the InBios West Nile Detect IgM Capture ELISA, the DENV Detect IgM Capture ELISA and the CHIKjj Detect IgM ELISA for WNV, DENV and CHIKV, respectively (InBios International, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Of the 384 samples tested for IgM antibodies by ELISA, 28 tested positive for antibodies to one virus: CHIKV, 19; ZIKV, 5; YFV, 2; DENV, 1; and WNV, 1 (Table 1, shaded). Note that for the YFV and ZIKV IgM MAC-ELISA, a P/N between two and three is normally considered to be equivocal and requires additional testing. For our purpose, since additional testing was performed on all equivocal and positive samples, they are listed as positive. One additional DENV equivocal result obtained from a CHIKV IgM-positive sample was not resolved upon retesting (Table 1, ARBO1208UVRI). Virus isolation on vero cell monolayers was attempted on all samples, but yielded no isolates after 14 days in culture.

Table 1.

Serum specimens with positive IgM results to select arboviruses by ELISA showing P/N* and ISR values

Lab ID Date collected YFV P/N WNV ISR DN ISR ZIKA P/N CHIKV ISR

ARB00357UVRI 03/13/14 1.365 0.857 0.762 1.741 3.658
ARB00578UVRI 11/19/15 1.000 1.073 1.301 0.972 1.392
ARB00588UVRI 11/24/15 1.092 0.953 0.060 1.265 2.091
ARB00634UVRI 02/09/16 0.934 0.324 0.063 0.995 1.175
ARB00692UVRI 03/03/16 0.974 0.955 1.051 0.991 2.684
ARB00699UVRI 03/08/16 1.097 1.076 1.053 1.144 1.534
ARB00705UVRI 03/17/16 0.869 1.054 2.204 0.961 1.955
ARB00710UVRI 03/24/16 1.179 1.027 1.012 0.887 1.178
ARB00712UVRI 04/01/16 1.146 1.150 1.060 0.883 4.085
ARB00714UVRI 04/01/16 0.995 1.164 1.053 1.215 1.154
ARB00872UVRI 05/11/16 1.015 1.319 1.026 0.991 1.236
ARB00975UVRI 08/05/16 0.705 1.558 1.373 0.858 10.745
ARB00990UVRI 09/29/16 1.353 1.261 1.067 1.482 1.836
ARB00995UVRI 10/04/16 2.510 2.741 1.412 1.071 0.284
ARB01027UVRI 11/02/16 0.710 1.128 0.924 0.818 2.248
ARB01028UVRI 11/02/16 0.574 1.143 0.994 0.695 2.066
ARB01034UVRI 11/10/16 0.717 1.728 1.195 2.821 0.293
ARB01072UVRI 02/20/17 0.555 5.990 2.704 0.578 0.423
ARB01119UVRI 04/18/17 1.393 1.637 1.398 2.000 0.819
ARB01120UVRI 04/18/17 0.979 1.382 1.059 3.960 0.147
ARB01125UVRI 04/24/17 0.885 1.212 1.1.5 1.175 1.485
ARB01129UVRI 04/25/17 0.736 1.208 1.054 2.659 0.231
ARB01155UVRI 06/16/18 0.799 1.071 0.996 0.811 1.450
ARB01164UVRI 07/26/17 0.823 1.605 4.076 0.986 0.250
ARB01165UVRI 07/27/17 4.442 1.476 1.140 0.694 0.186
ARB01193UVRI 08/21/17 1.048 1.382 0.583 1.234 1.236
ARB01208UVRI 09/12/17 1.025 1.152 1.896 1.117 3.801
ARB01279UVRI 10/25/17 1.457 1.063 0.849 4.711 0.269
*

P/N, mean OD450 of patient serum on viral antigen divided by mean OD450 of negative control on viral antigen.

ISR, immune status ratio, ratio of the test sample OD450 to the mean cut-off control value.

See Table S1 (available in the online version of this article) for result interpretation guidelines.

Shaded only are IgM positives for YFV, WNV and CHIKV.

Shaded and bold are ZIKV only IgM samples.

None of the five ZIKV IgM-positive samples demonstrated cross-reactivity to the other viruses tested (Table 1). The five ZIKV IgM-positive samples were further tested for specific neutralizing antibodies to ZIKV (MR766), YFV (Couma), WNV (Eg101) and DENV-1–4 (ChimeriVax dengue virus 1–4) by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) as described previously [25]. Three ZIKV IgM-positive samples were confirmed by PRNT, as determined by fourfold or greater increase in the reciprocal sample dilution resulting in 90 % neutralization relative to all other viruses tested. The neutralizing titres for the acute samples ranged from 1 : 160 to 1 : 2560 (Table 2). A convalescent serum sample was obtained from one ZIKV IgM-positive patient 4 weeks after the first acute sample was taken. The convalescent sample further exhibited a fourfold or greater increase in ZIKV neutralizing antibody titre relative to the acute sample. Clinically, two of these cases presented with intense fatigue, anorexia, muscle pain, joint pain and headache, while one only had fever, abdominal pain and hiccups (Table 3). None had clinical symptoms of vomiting, conjunctivitis, skin rash or retroorbital pain. The cause of infection in two of the five ZIKV IgM-positives could not be distinguished by PRNT. Sample ARB01279 did not neutralize any of the viruses tested and thus was reported as an unspecified flavivirus infection.

Table 2.

PRNT results and interpretations for serum samples with positive or equivocal ZIKV IgM ELISA results

Lab ID YFV titre WNV titre DENV-1 titre DENV-2 titre DENV-3 titre DENV-4 titre ZIKV titre Final result

ARB01034 5 10 <5 <5 <5 <5 640 ZIKV
ARB01034_C* 10 10 <5 <5 <5 <5 10240 ZIKV
ARB01119 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 160 ZIKV
ARB01120 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 20 Unidentified alphavirus infection
ARB01129 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 2560 ZIKV
ARB01279 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 Presumptive flavivirus
*

Convalescent sample.

Table 3.

Symptoms exhibited by patients confirmed with Zika virus infection The empty cells indicate the patient did not exhibit that symptom.

Symptoms ARB01034 ARB01119 ARB01129

Fever X X X
Date of illness onset Not reported 04/01/2017 03/25/2017
Vomiting/nausea
Intense fatigue/general weakness X X
Anorexia/loss of appetite X X
Abdominal pain X X X
Chest pain X X
Muscle pain X X
Joint pain X X
Headache X X
Cough X
Jaundice X
Conjunctivitis
Skin rash
Hiccups X
Pain behind eye

Among the 384 specimens tested, a single sample tested positive for more than one virus. ARB01120 demonstrated a fourfold greater neutralization titre against ZIKV than the viruses tested, although the titre was low, suggesting a previous infection. This sample was also positive for alphavirus RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing using group-specific primers; attempts to further identify the RNA by subsequent RT-PCR testing using CHIKV, onyong-nyong and Semliki Forest virus-specific primers [26] returned negative results. This sample may represent a ZIKV/alphavirus co-infection, but despite the observed fourfold difference, the low ZIKV PRNT titre is more likely indicative of a past infection with ZIKV or another flavivirus than an acute flavivirus infection. Recent surveillance for arboviruses in mosquitoes resulted in the isolation of Babanki virus, genus Alphavirus, from Nkokonjeru, and Usutu virus, genus Flavivirus, from nearby Jinja [27].

It is likely that ZIKV has circulated continuously at a low level in Uganda, but due in part to a lack of ZIKV surveillance among symptomatic individuals, this is the first time that human ZIKV infection has been reported in Uganda in more than 50 years. ZIKV infection was last reported in the country in 1964 in a 28-year-old European male who had lived in Uganda for 2.5 months before the onset of illness with headache, rash and fever [5]. With the ongoing ZIKV circulation in South and North America, the question has been raised as to whether ZIKV is still circulating in Uganda. This study provides evidence of the continued circulation of ZIKV in Uganda.

PRNT confirmed ZIKV as the cause of infection in three out of five presumptive IgM-positive cases. Neutralizing patient serum exhibited a greater than fourfold increase in the neutralization of ZIKV compared to other flaviviruses. Extensive IgM cross-reactions frequently occur in ELISA testing where patients have been exposed to alternative or previous flavivirus infection or vaccination [28]. This suggests that differential PRNT should be included in the routine laboratory testing algorithm, because ZIKV versus DENV results are crucial for guiding the clinical management of patients and public health prevention efforts. However, we report here confirmed ZIKV infection in a country without a high historical DENV circulation.

This study has some limitations. Most importantly, the number of ZIKV cases identified likely underestimates the true number that occurred. Despite the dramatic birth defects associated with ZIKV infection in newborns, in healthy adults ZIKV infection is generally thought to produce mild illness. Since this was a hospital-based serosurvey, any asymptomatic infections or infections producing symptoms not severe enough to warrant hospitalization would not have been included in the survey. Despite this limitation, the hospital-based surveillance system has proven useful in providing information regarding the occurrence of arbovirus infections in this region, and in establishing a baseline for comparison with future AFI and arbovirus surveillance.

The cause of the infection could not be determined conclusively by PRNT in two of the five ZIKV IgM ELISA-positive cases. Using group-specific RT-PCR, we identified one of the cases as an acute unidentified alphavirus infection. As with other arbovirus infections, RT-PCR can detect acute ZIKV infections, provided that serum is collected within the first few days of illness, and when positive, RT-PCR clarifies interpretation of the results [29]. Molecular methods, however, increase the cost of testing, and serum must be stored at −80 °C immediately after collection to prevent viral RNA degradation. In addition, it is more difficult to establish and maintain the required technical capacity in low- and middle-income hospitals and public health laboratories. Therefore, it would not be possible to perform routine molecular testing for ZIKV surveillance at most African public health laboratories. Similarly, virus isolation testing can provide a clear result, but requires a high-quality patient serum specimen that must be collected relatively early in infection and stored/shipped on liquid nitrogen or dry ice. The majority of hospital and public health laboratories in Uganda do not have the capacity to perform the virus isolation procedure or to characterize any viruses isolated.

The results of our study indicate that the current laboratory-based arbovirus surveillance system in Uganda should be enhanced to include routine laboratory testing confirmation of hospitalized non-malaria AFI cases and enrol more hospitals and health centres in order to further monitor disease incidence and the trends of mosquito-borne viruses. This would provide an opportunity, when possible, to differentiate ZIKV infections from AFIs caused by infections with other viruses. In order to identify regional differences, the most appropriate arbovirus surveillance strategy would be nationwide surveillance with reporting of clinical AFI cases, with selected sentinel hospital sites at which specimens can be collected and sent for arbovirus testing. With limited resources to set up specialized surveillance sites, and with the caveat that cases not requiring hospitalization would be missed, hospitals are the most appropriate choice for sentinel sites.

In conclusion, this study provides evidence of ZIKV infection occurring in patients presenting with AFI at a hospital in Nkokonjeru, Uganda. Future expansion of the hospital sentinel surveillance system will provide continued disease burden information, facilitating the monitoring of trends in arbovirus infections throughout the country.

Supplementary Material

Supp table

Five reasons to publish your next article with a Microbiology Society journal.

  1. The Microbiology Society is a not-for-profit organization.

  2. We offer fast and rigorous peer review – average time to first decision is 4–6 weeks.

  3. Our journals have a global readership with subscriptions held in research institutions around the world.

  4. 80% of our authors rate our submission process as ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’.

  5. Your article will be published on an interactive journal platform with advanced metrics.

Find out more and submit your article at microbiologyresearch.org.

Acknowledgements

We thank Charity Angella Nassuna and Isaac Omara working under the cooperative internship programme in the Arbovirology Department at the UVRI for their assistance during all laboratory testing procedures. We also thank the administration, clinicians and laboratory personnel at St Francis Hospital Nkokonjeru, who identified the patients and performed the sample collection.

Funding information

This study was funded in part by the Global Health Security Agenda through a cooperative agreement between the US Centers for Disease Control and the Uganda Virus Research Institute.

Abbreviations:

AFI

acute febrile illness

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CHIKV

chikungunya virus

DENV

dengue virus

DVBD

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

IgM

immunoglobulin M

MAC-ELISA

immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

PHEIC

Public Health Emergency of International Concern

PRNT

plaque reduction neutralization test

RT-PCR

reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction

UVRI

Uganda Virus Research Institute

WHO

World Health Organization

WNV

West Nile virus

YFV

yellow fever virus

ZIKV

Zika virus

Footnotes

One supplementary table is available with the online version of this article.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Chouin-Carneiro T, Vega-Rua A, Vazeille M, Yebakima A, Girod R et al. Differential susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0004543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus (I). Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1952;46:509–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MacNamara FN. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1954;48:139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bearcroft WG. Zika virus infection experimentally induced in a human volunteer. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1956;50:438–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simpson DI. Zika virus infection in man. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1964;58:339–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moore DL, Causey OR, Carey DE, Reddy S, Cooke AR et al. Arthropod-borne viral infections of man in Nigeria, 1964–1970. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1975;69:49–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fagbami AH. Zika virus infections in Nigeria: virological and seroepidemiological investigations in Oyo State. J Hyg (Lond) 1979;83:213–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Filipe AR, Martins CM, Rocha H. Laboratory infection with Zika virus after vaccination against yellow fever. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 1973;43:315–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olson JG, Ksiazek TG, Suhandiman, Triwibowo. Zika virus, a cause of fever in Central Java, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1981;75:389–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2536–2543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.ProMED-mail. 2015. Undiagnosed illness - Brazil (02): Zika virus conf. ProMED-mail 2015; 20150515.3364149 www.promedmail.org. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Faria NR, Azevedo R, Kraemer MUG, Souza R, Cunha MS et al. Zika virus in the Americas: early epidemiological and genetic findings. Science 2016;352:345–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2321–2334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popović M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016;374: 951–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Broutet N, Krauer F, Riesen M, Khalakdina A, Almiron M et al. Zika virus as a cause of neurologic disorders. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1506–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carteaux G, Maquart M, Bedet A, Contou D, Brugières P et al. Zika virus associated with meningoencephalitis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1595–1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mead PS, Hills SL, Brooks JT. Zika virus as a sexually transmitted pathogen. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018;31:39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health Organization. 2016. Zika Virus and Potential Complications. Geneva: WHO; www.who.int/emergencies/zikavirus/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008;451: 990–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nyakarahuka L, Ayebare S, Mosomtai G, Kankya C, Lutwama J et al. Ecological niche modeling for filoviruses: a risk map for Ebola and Marburg virus disease outbreaks in Uganda. PLoS Curr 2017;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mayanja M, Mutebi JP, Crabtree MB, Ssenfuka F, Muwawu T et al. Studies on the species composition and relative abundance of mosquitoes of Mpigi District, central Uganda. J Entomol Zool Stud 2014;2:317–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mutebi JP, Crabtree MB, Kading RC, Powers AM, Lutwama JJ et al. Mosquitoes of western Uganda. J Med Entomol 2012;49: 1289–1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mutebi JP, Crabtree MB, Kading RC, Powers AM, Ledermann JP et al. Mosquitoes of Northwestern Uganda. J Med Entomol 2018; 55:587–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin DA, Muth DA, Brown T, Johnson AJ, Karabatsos N et al. Standardization of immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for routine diagnosis of arboviral infections. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1823–1826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Beaty BJ, Calisher CH, Shope RE. Arboviruses In: Schmidt NJ, Lennette DA, Lennette ET, Lennette EH, Emmons RW et al. (editors). Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections, 7th ed Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995. pp. 204–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ledermann JP, Zeidner N, Borland EM, Mutebi JP, Lanciotti RS et al. Sunguru virus: a novel virus in the family Rhabdoviridae isolated from a chicken in north-western Uganda. J Gen Virol 2014; 95:1436–1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mossel EC, Crabtree MB, Mutebi JP, Lutwama JJ, Borland EM et al. Arboviruses isolated from mosquitoes collected in Uganda, 2008–2012. J Med Entomol 2017;54:1403–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, Velez JO, Lambert AJ et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14: 1232–1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rabe IB, Staples JE, Villanueva J, Hummel KB, Johnson JA et al. Interim guidance for interpretation of zika virus antibody test results. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:543–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp table

RESOURCES