Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2019 Sep 19;83:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.09.003

Figure 8: Tone reversal testing indicated animals were not using tone frequencies to locate the correct sipper.

Figure 8:

For both strains, consumption (A), the proportion of access trials where the animal drank (B), the latency to first lick (C), and the ratio of beam breaks during go vs. stay cues (D) did not change when the frequency relationship between go and stay cues was reversed. (Mean +/− SEM in all plots.)