Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a human pathogen that causes severe hematological disorders in immunocompromised individuals. B19V infection has a remarkable tropism with respect to human erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) in human bone marrow and fetal liver. During B19V infection, only one viral precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is transcribed by a single promoter of the viral genome and is alternatively spliced and alternatively polyadenylated, a process which plays a key role in expression of viral proteins. Our studies revealed that a cellular RNA binding protein, RBM45, binds to two intron splicing enhancers and is essential for the maturation of the small nonstructural protein 11-kDa-encoding mRNA. The 11-kDa protein plays an important role not only in B19V infection-induced apoptosis but also in viral DNA replication. Thus, the identification of the RBM45 protein and its cognate binding site in B19V pre-mRNA provides a novel target for antiviral development to combat B19V infection-caused severe hematological disorders.
KEYWORDS: RBM45, mRNA splicing, intron splicing enhancer, parvovirus B19, 11-kDa protein, RNA binding proteins, RNA processing, parvovirus
ABSTRACT
During infection of human parvovirus B19 (B19V), one viral precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is transcribed by a single promoter and is alternatively spliced and alternatively polyadenylated. Here, we identified a novel cis-acting sequence (5′-GUA AAG CUA CGG GAC GGU-3′), intronic splicing enhancer 3 (ISE3), which lies 72 nucleotides upstream of the second splice acceptor (A2-2) site of the second intron that defines the exon of the mRNA encoding the 11-kDa viral nonstructural protein. RNA binding motif protein 45 (RBM45) specifically binds to ISE3 with high affinity (equilibrium dissociation constant [KD] = 33 nM) mediated by its RNA recognition domain and 2-homo-oligomer assembly domain (RRM2-HOA). Knockdown of RBM45 expression or ectopic overexpression of RRM2-HOA in human erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) expanded ex vivo significantly decreased the level of viral mRNA spliced at the A2-2 acceptor but not that of the mRNA spliced at A2-1 that encodes VP2. Moreover, silent mutations of ISE3 in an infectious DNA of B19V significantly reduced 11-kDa expression. Notably, RBM45 also specifically interacts in vitro with ISE2, which shares the octanucleotide (GGGACGGU) with ISE3. Taken together, our results suggest that RBM45, through binding to both ISE2 and ISE3, is an essential host factor for maturation of 11-kDa-encoding mRNA.
INTRODUCTION
Human parvovirus B19 (B19V), a member of the Erythroparvovirus genus within the Parvoviridae family (1), has a linear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome of 5,596 nucleotides (nt) that is flanked by two identical inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) (2–4). B19V is an autonomously replicating human parvovirus with a remarkable tropism for human erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) of the bone marrow and fetal liver (5–7). B19V infection can result in hematological disorders under a variety of circumstances. In patients with increased destruction of erythrocytes and a high demand for erythrocyte production (for example, during sickle cell anemia and hereditary spherocytosis), acute B19V infection can cause transient aplastic crisis (8–11), and in immunocompromised patients, such as AIDS patients and organ transplant recipients, B19V infection leads to persistent viremia associated with chronic anemia and pure red-cell aplasia (12–18). In fetuses of pregnant women, B19V infection can result in nonimmune hydrops fetalis and fetal death (19–23). The clinical manifestations of B19V infection in patients with transient aplastic crisis, pure red-cell aplasia, chronic anemia, and hydrops fetalis are due to the direct cytotoxicity of the virus infection (24–26), a direct outcome of the cell cycle arrest and cell death of the EPCs that host B19V replication (7, 27–30).
During B19V replication, after conversion from the ssDNA viral genome, the viral double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) replicative form (RF) genome is transcribed by the single P6 promoter. The viral precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is alternatively spliced and alternatively polyadenylated resulting in the generation of nine major viral mRNA transcripts that encode capsid proteins (VP1 and VP2) and nonstructural proteins (NS1, 11-kDa, and 7.5-kDa) (31–34). NS1 is the only viral protein that is essential for B19V DNA replication (35–37). However, the small nonstructural protein 11-kDa, which is localized predominantly in the cytoplasm and plays an enhancement role in viral DNA replication, is unique among parvoviruses (38). Mechanistically, the 11-kDa protein interacts with Grb2 (growth factor receptor bound protein 2) through the three SH3-binding motifs of the 11-kDa protein. This interaction disrupts the extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 signaling and upregulates viral DNA replication (38).
Alternative processing of B19V pre-mRNA plays a key role in regulating expression of viral proteins through interactions of host RNA-binding proteins with the viral pre-mRNA (39–41). The intronic splicing enhancer 2 (ISE2), located immediately downstream of the second donor (D2), is critical for splicing of the viral pre-mRNA at D2, which controls production of the mRNAs encoding both VP2 and 11-kDa (41). We have shown that RNA binding motif protein 38 (RBM38) binds to ISE2 and executes a function in splicing of viral pre-mRNA at D2 and the second acceptor of the second intron (A2-2), which encodes mRNA encoding 11-kDa (37). However, how the RBM38 specifically regulates maturation of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA is unknown.
RBM45, also named drb1, was recently found to be a FUS (fused-in-sarcoma) protein-interacting RNA-binding protein (42). It is localized predominately in the nucleus (43), where it plays an important role in the DNA damage response (DDR) (44). It is recruited to the DNA damage sites in a poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR)-dependent and FUS-dependent manner and promotes dsDNA break repair by preventing histone deacetylase 1 from excessive recruitment. However, under disease conditions, such as those seen with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal lobar degeneration, and Alzheimer’s disease patients (45), RBM45 distributes within transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP43)-positive cytoplasmic inclusions, where RBM45 physically associates with TDP-43 (42). Although it was initially identified as an RNA-binding protein and exhibited preferential binding to poly(C) RNA (46), the functions of RBM45 in the DDR and under these disease conditions are not mediated by any RNAs. Proteomics analysis of the RBM45 interactome has identified a number of splicing factors (47); however, the role of RBM45 in RNA-mediated functions, including mRNA splicing, has never been experimentally explored.
In this study, we took an RNA pulldown and mass spectrometry (MS) approach to identify host proteins that interact with the B19V ISE2. We found that RBM45 bound both to ISE2 and to the novel ISE3 that is located in front of the branch point of the A2-2 acceptor. We propose that RBM45 plays a role as a scaffold protein to bring the U1 snRNP that interacts with D2 and the U2 snRNP that is recruited to the A2-2 acceptor, which facilitates spliceosome formation of the second intron (D2 to A2-2 sites) of the B19V pre-mRNA.
RESULTS
Identification of B19V ISE2-interacting proteins.
We previously reported that ISE2 is critical for the recognition of the D2 site for splicing and that the interaction of RBM38 with ISE2 promotes splicing of the intron from the D2 to the A2-2 splice sites (37, 41). Thus, we asked whether other host factors could interact with ISE2 and facilitate the alternative splicing at these sites. To this end, we synthesized wild-type (WT) ISE2 RNA (ISE2-WT) and mutant ISE2 RNA (ISE2-mut3) (37, 41) with biotin labeling at the 5′ ends (Fig. 1A) and incubated them with nuclear lysates extracted from UT7/Epo-S1 cells in the presence of poly(I·C). We then performed an RNA pulldown assay using streptavidin-conjugated agarose beads that bound biotinylated RNA molecules. Pulldown nuclear proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained with Coomassie blue. Eleven obviously unique bands of >30 kDa in the sample pulled down by ISE2-WT, but not by ISE2-mut3 (Fig. 1B), were excised for liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). From the MS results, we chose 22 proteins with ≥20 unique peptide hits, or the top 3 proteins (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), which are related to mRNA processing/RNA binding as analyzed by UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/). We then performed RNA pulldown assays to confirm the binding of the 22 candidates with biotinylated RNA. We found that ISE2-WT pulled down 16 candidate proteins, whereas ISE2-mut3 did not (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), suggesting that these 16 proteins directly or indirectly interact with ISE2.
RBM45 is essential for expression of viral 11-kDa during B19V infection of CD36+ EPCs.
We next asked whether knockdown of the expression of these ISE2-interacting proteins affected expression of the VP2 and 11-kDa proteins. As hnRNP proteins function as negative regulators of mRNA splicing (48), we excluded all hnRNP proteins during the knockdown procedures, as well as SF3B1, which is an essential U2 snRNP component (49), and DHX37, which plays a role in ribosome biogenesis (50). We found the presence of lentivirally expressed short hairpin RNA (shRNA) specifically targeting RBM6, KHSRP, DDX21, LARP7, PURA, or RBM45 (Table S2; see also Fig. S2) drastically reduced expression of 11-kDa, but not VP2, in UT7/Epo-S1 cells transfected with B19V infectious clone M20, whereas shRNA targeting SRSF1 (ASF/SF2) and DHX9 did not (Fig. S2). We met difficulties in achieving sufficient knockdown of FUBP1, which has a positive role in mRNA splicing regulation (51) (Table S1). As RBM45 was previously shown to interact with a number of splicing factors in a proteomics analysis (47) and as its functions in mRNA splicing have never been investigated, we chose RBM45 for use in exploring roles in viral mRNA splicing and 11-kDa expression.
RBM45 knockdown did not obviously alter the cell cycle progression of CD36+ EPCs (Fig. 2B and C). We tested the role of RBM45 in B19V viral mRNA processing in B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs. Control shScramble (shScram)-transduced CD36+ EPCs and RBM45 knockdown CD36+ EPCshRBM45 were infected with B19V, and the cells were collected for total RNA extraction at 48 h postinfection, followed by analysis of viral mRNA (VP1, VP2, NS1, and 11-kDa) using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The results showed that RBM45 knockdown significantly decreased levels of 11-kDa coding mRNA by 4-fold, but the level of other viral mRNAs remained unaffected (Fig. 3A). We also tested the viral proteins in CD36+ EPCshRB45 using Western blotting. The results showed that the level of the 11-kDa protein, but not VP1, VP2, and NS1, was significantly decreased in B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs upon RBM45 knockdown (Fig. 3B). As 11-kDa plays an enhancement role in B19V DNA replication (37), we asked whether RBM45 knockdown decreased viral DNA replication via decreasing 11-kDa protein expression. We infected CD36+ EPCshRBM45 with B19V. At 48 h postinfection, the cells were collected and examined for DNA replication by Southern blotting. The results showed that RBM45 knockdown significantly decreased viral DNA replication by >3-fold compared with that seen in the cells treated with scramble shRNA (Fig. 3C and D).
Taking all these results together, we demonstrated that RBM45 regulates 11-kDa protein expression through decreasing splicing of the viral pre-mRNA for production of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA in B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs. We also confirmed that the RBM45 plays an important role in B19V DNA replication through the regulation of 11-kDa protein expression (37).
Identification of a novel intronic splicing enhancer in B19V pre-mRNA that is bound by RBM45.
In order to determine the mechanism underlying the RBM45 regulation of 11-kDa-encoding mRNA production, we looked for the RNA sequence that was bound by RBM45. As RBM45 specifically targeted 11-kDa expression, which is encoded from viral mRNA spliced at the A2-2 acceptor, we looked for the RBM45-binding site in a viral RNA sequence near the A2-2 acceptor using an in vitro RNA pulldown assay. We synthesized a large portion of the intron (nt 4710 to 4905) before the A2-2 acceptor in vitro, labeled it with biotin, and used it to pull down RBM45 in nuclear lysates extracted from UT7/Epo-S1 cells. Similarly, we biotinylated the B19V 11-kD exon mRNA (nt 4890 to 5171) to perform the RNA pulldown assay with the cell lysates. The results showed that RBM45 bound to the intron part of the B19V RNA from nt 4710 to nt 4905 (Fig. 4A) but not the exon RNA (Fig. 4B). To further identify the RBM45-binding site, we performed in vitro transcription of overlapped RNAs in the region of nt 4710 to 4905 and used them in the RNA binding assay. We identified the left end of the RBM45-binding sequence at nt 4786 (Fig. 4C). We then used a similar strategy to determine the right end of the RBM45 binding site at nt 4811 (Fig. 4D). Finally, we narrowed down the binding sequence to nt 4786 to 4811 (26 nt), which we named intronic splicing enhancer 3–26 nt (ISE326nt).
We next asked whether purified RBM45 protein could bind to ISE326nt of 26 nt. We purified His-tagged RBM45 (Fig. 4E) and synthesized 5′-biotin WT ISE326nt and four mutant ISE326nt (ISE326nt-mut1, mut2, mut3, and mut4) RNAs (Fig. 4F). The ISE326nt complementary (ISE326nt-com) RNA and His-tagged glutathione S-transferase (GST-His) protein served as the negative RNA and protein controls, respectively. Upon incubation of the six RNA molecules with purified RBM45 or GST in the presence of poly(I·C), we pulled down the RNAs using streptavidin-coated beads and found that ISE326nt-WT pulled down much more RBM45 than ISE326nt-mut2, ISE326nt-mut3, and ISE326nt-mut4 (Fig. 4G). Of note, ISE326nt-mut1 bound to more RBM45 than ISE326nt-WT, indicating that the 8-GC sequence (GGGGCCCC) at the 5′ end of ISE326nt was not necessary for the binding of ISE326nt with RBM45.
Collectively, the data confirmed the essentiality of ISE3, with 5′-GUA AAG CUA CGG GAC GGU-3′, the 18 nucleotides of ISE326nt, representing a novel ISE of B19V pre-mRNA that binds RBM45.
RBM45 specifically binds to ISE3 at high affinity under in vitro conditions.
In order to confirm whether the presence of ISE3 was sufficient for binding to RBM45 and to determine the specificity of the interaction, we used biotinylated ISE3 (Fig. 5A) and purified RBM45 in the RNA pulldown assay. The results showed that ISE3 pulled down RBM45 at a much higher level of efficiency than its complementary sequence, ISE3-com (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, to determine the affinity of binding of RBM45 with ISE3, we used biotinylated ISE3 or ISE3-com in an in vitro binding assay based on biolayer interferometry (BLI). The BLI assays showed that RBM45 bound to ISE3 but not the His-tagged maltose-binding protein (MBP-His) control and that RBM45 also did not bind to ISE3-com control RNA (Fig. 5C). Then, we used various concentrations of RBM45 to determine the binding affinity for RBM45 with ISE3. The results showed that there were related increases in the levels of binding of ISE3 and RBM45 as the concentration of RBM45 increased (Fig. 5D). The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) corresponding to the binding between ISE3 and RBM45 was calculated to be 33.9 ± 22.2 nM (Fig. 5E). Taking the results together, we had demonstrated that RBM45 specifically binds to ISE3 of B19V pre-mRNA at high affinity.
The RRM2-HOA domain of RBM45 is largely responsible for binding to ISE3 of B19V pre-mRNA, overexpression of which decreases expression of 11-kDa.
We then asked which domain of RBM45 was responsible for the binding to ISE3. As shown in Fig. 6A, RBM45 contains three RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains, namely, RRM1, RRM2, and RRM3 (shown in red in Fig. 6A), a homo-oligomer assembly (HOA) domain (shown in green), and the linker between them (shown in yellow) (42). We purified 9 different truncated RBM45 proteins tagged with His (Fig. 6B) to test their binding with ISE3 using the BLI assay. First, we tested the binding of domains 1, 2, 3, 1–2, and 2–3 with ISE3. The results showed that the level of affinity of domain 2–3 for ISE3 (21.8 ± 1.5 nM) was similar to that seen with full-length RBM45 (36.9 ± 6.3 nM) (Fig. 6C). Domain 2-HOA and the domain corresponding to amino acids (aa) 2 to 257 had KD values for ISE3 of 21.3 ± 2.0 nM and 43.0 ± 3.4 nM, respectively (Fig. 6D). Thus, we determined that the RRM2-HOA domain (aa 121 to 318) is the key domain for binding of RBM45 with ISE3.
Having identified the ISE3-binding domain of RBM45 (RRM2-HOA), we attempted to overexpress it in CD36+ EPCs to look for an effect of expression of 11-kDa on B19V infection. We observed that overexpression of RRM2-HOA significantly decreased the levels of 11-kDa-encoding mRNAs (Fig. 7A) and the 11-kDa protein (Fig. 7B), as well as viral DNA replication (Fig. 7C and D). This result strongly suggested that the RRM2-HOA domain competes with endogenous RBM45 and diminishes the function of RBM45 in expression of 11-kDa-encoding mRNA.
A B19V duplex genome clone (M20) that harbors silent mutations of ISE3 expresses a low level of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA that is spliced at A2-2, resulting in a low level of expression of 11-kDa in transfected cells.
Having determined that RBM45 specifically binds to ISE3, we asked whether silent mutations of ISE3 in B19V infectious clone M20 would have an effect on expression of 11-kDa. Transfection of M20 into UT7/Epo-S1 cells confers viral DNA replication and production of virions that are infectious in EPCs (52).
We made ISE3 mutants that have silent mutations without a coding change, tested their binding with RBM45 in vitro, and determined that mutant ISE3-mut7 (Fig. 8A) pulled down RBM45 poorly (Fig. 8B). We introduced ISE3-mut7 into infectious clone pM20, which resulted in pM20ISE3-mut7 remaining a WT VP2 open reading frame (ORF) (Fig. 8C). pM20 and pM20ISE3-mut7 were transfected into UT7/Epo-S1 cells for analysis of the viral mRNAs and viral proteins, as well as viral DNA replication. The results showed that 11-kDa mRNA was expressed at significantly lower levels in pM20ISE3-mut7-transfected UT7/Epo-S1 cells than in pM20-transfected cells (Fig. 8D), which resulted in less 11-kDa protein expression (Fig. 8E). The poor splicing of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA from the A2-2 site was further confirmed by a direct analysis of the VP2-encoding and 11-kDa-encoding mRNA by Northern blotting (Fig. 8F). And the result showed that splicing at the A2-2 site (as shown by the VP2/11-kDa mRNA ratio) was decreased by 2.6-fold (Fig. 8G). In contrast, both mRNA expression and protein expression of VP1/2 and NS1 were not affected (Fig. 8D and E). In addition, Southern blot analysis of Hirt DNA extracted from transfected cells showed that silent mutations of ISE3 in infectious clone M20 significantly decreased B19V DNA replication (by ∼2.5-fold for the monomer replicative form [mRF] DNA) compared with the results seen with the counterpart WT M20 clone (Fig. 8H and I), which was again in line with the previous observation that 11-kDa plays a role in viral DNA replication (38).
Overall, our results demonstrated that the B19V duplex genome clone that harbored silent mutations of ISE3 expressed a low level of the mRNA spliced from the D2 to the A2-2 sites, which resulted in less 11-kDa expression and viral DNA replication in transfected cells.
RBM45 localizes within the viral DNA replication centers.
Next, we looked at the colocalization of the RBM45 with the viral DNA replication centers. As the viral capsid is colocalized with the replicating viral genome in the B19V replication center as previously published (53), we used an anti-capsid antibody to localize the virus replication centers. We observed precise form of colocalization of the anti-RBM45 staining (green) with the anti-capsid antibody staining in B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs at 48 h postinfection (Fig. 9A). This colocalization was further confirmed by a proximity ligation assay (PLA) using moue anti-capsid and rabbit anti-RBM45 antibodies (Fig. 9B), indicating that RBM45 localizes within the virus replication centers in B19V-infected EPCs.
RBM45 specifically binds to ISE2 at high affinity in vitro.
RBM45 was initially identified in the pulldown assay using biotinylated ISE2 (Fig. 1); therefore, we tested whether RBM45 directly interacts with ISE2 (Fig. 10A). Biotinylated ISE2 and ISE3 were both able to pull down purified RBM45 but not the ISE2-mut3 control RNA (Fig. 10B). We also determined the binding affinity of RBM45 with ISE2 using BLI assays. The assays showed that RBM45 bound to ISE2, but not the ISE3-com control (Fig. 10D). The KD values representing the binding affinity of RBM45 with the ISE2 were calculated to be 19.5 ± 10.1 nM (Fig. 10G).
Notably, ISE2 contains the last 8 nucleotides (5′-GGGACGGU-3′) of ISE3 (ISE38nt) (Fig. 10A), and both biotinylated ISE38nt and the maximally shared 9 nucleotides (5′-GGGACGGUG-3′ [ISE39nt]) of RNAs pulled down RBM45 but not the ISE3-com control RNA (Fig. 10C). The binding affinity of RBM45 with the core ISE38nt and the extended ISE39nt was determined at various concentrations of RBM45 using BLI assays (Fig. 10E and F). The BLI results showed that RBM45 bound to both ISE38nt and ISE39nt at high affinity with KD values of 18.2 ± 9.3 nM and 16.3 ± 4.4 nM, respectively (Fig. 10G), suggesting that this octanucleotide sequence (ISE38nt) represents the core RNA binding sequence of RBM45.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we revealed a novel function of RBM45 in the maturation of the 11-kDa mRNA of B19V. RBM45 specifically binds to ISE3 (5′-GUA AAG CUA CGG GAC GGU-3′), which is 72 nt upstream of the A2-2 splice acceptor. RBM45 also binds to ISE2, located immediately downstream of D2. Importantly, knockdown of RBM45 exhibits a phenotype in splicing of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA only and not that of the VP2-encoding mRNA, highlighting the specific role of RBM45, which is similar to the role of the RBM38 (37), in splicing of viral pre-mRNA at the A2-2 acceptor for production of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA. We propose an RBM45 working model (Fig. 11) in which RBM45 functions as a scaffold protein that facilitates the interaction between the U1 snRNP that binds to the D2 and the U2 snRNP that binds to the A2-2 acceptor, which defines the intron between the D2 and A2-2 splice sites.
In the ISE2 pulldown assay, we confirmed the presence of 16 proteins interacting with ISE2 in vitro (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), among which DHX9, KHSRP, and 4 hnRNP proteins (hnRNP H1, hnRNP D, hnRNP A3, and hnRNP H3) were found to interact with RBM45 in a previous study using immunoprecipitation-coupled mass spectrometry (47). Further knockdown of KHSRP, RBM6, DDX21, LARP7, or PURA revealed a clear decrease in 11-kDa expression (Fig. S2). As hnRNPs play notable roles in negative regulation of mRNA splicing (48), we speculate that RBM45 may function as a hub to regulate splicing of 11-kDa-encoding mRNA through interacting with other ISE2-binding proteins (ISE2-BPs), e.g., KHSRP, and/or U1-specific U1 proteins (U1A, U1C, or U70K) at the 5′ splice site and with RBM45-interacting proteins and/or U2 proteins (e.g., SF3B1) at the 3′ splice site, facilitating the interaction of U1 snRNP and U2 snRNP with the 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively, and defining the intron from D2 to A2-2 (Fig. 11). SF3B1 was identified in the ISE2 interactome (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), and the identification was confirmed by the RNA pulldown assay (Fig. S1). SF3B1 is a part of the SF3B complex, which is essential for assembly of the U2 snRNP and for pre-mRNA splicing (54, 55). The SF3B complex is required for assembly of the spliceosome A complex formed by stable binding of U2 snRNP to the branch point site within pre-mRNA, which is sequence independent (56). mRNA splicing involves about 150 proteins in the spliceosome, including RNA binding motif proteins (57), e.g., RBM17, a component of the core spliceosomal complex U2 snRNP (58, 59) that is abundant in intermediate complex A (58), and a number of hnRNP proteins (47). Our study determined that ISE3 is proximal to 3′ splice site A2-2 and is specifically bound by RBM45. More importantly, RBM45 plays a role in splicing of viral pre-mRNA only at the A2-2 site (for production of 11-kDa-encoding mRNA); thus, further studies should be focused on the interactions of RBM45 with protein components in the U2 snRNP.
On the other hand, we previously identified that RBM38, an erythroid-specific RNA-binding protein previously implicated in splicing (60, 61), specifically interacts with ISE2 through the “UGUGUG” motif and also plays an essential role in production of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA (37), as RBM45 does. The KD values of RBM45 with ISE2 and ISE3 are 19.5 and 33.9 nM, respectively, suggesting RBM45 has a similar affinity with both ISE2 and ISE3. This indicates RBM38 and RBM45 likely synergistically play a role in recognition of the intron between D2 and A2-2, but not of the intron between D2 and A2-1 by facilitating binding of U1 snRNP to D2. However, a direct interaction between RBM38 and RBM45 was not confirmed (data not shown). The key RBM45 binding motif (GGGACGGU) and the RBM38-binding motif (UGUGUG) neighbor each other. We hypothesize that RBM45 makes homo-oligomers (42) that bring RBM45-bound ISE2 and ISE3 into proximity such that the A2-2 branch point is preferably more accessible to the D2 site.
In normal cells, RBM45 is localized predominately in the nucleus (43) and plays a role in double-strand break (DSB) repair (44). Cytoplasm-localized RBM45 has been suggested to contribute to neurodegeneration in ALS (45). It is localized within the TDP43-positive cytoplasmic inclusions. This evidence suggests that the aggregation-induced loss of normal RBM45 function might also play an important role in ALS pathogenesis (44). The RNA binding sequence of RBM45 has not been defined. Early experiments indicated that RBM45 protein possesses a binding preference on poly(C) RNA. Later, an RNA motif (“GGGGCC”) was speculated to be bound by and recruit RBM45 to the TDP-43 inclusions in the cytoplasm of neuron cells of ALS patients (45, 62). However, in our study, mutation of the GGGGCC motif in ISE326nt did not result in a decrease in the binding of RBM45 to this mutant, excluding the possibility that the GGGGCC motif is involved in RBM45 binding. RBM45 binds at high affinity to both ISE2 and ISE3 (KD values, <34 nM), which share a core octanucleotide (GGGACGGU). This core octanucleotide turned out to be bound by RBM45 at high affinity in vitro (KD = 18 nM). It is possible that those cellular mRNAs that harbor this octanucleotide can sequester RBM45, which plays a role in regulation of mRNA splicing in the nucleus. Under disease conditions, the presence of mislocated RBM45 in the cytoplasm might lead to dysregulation of alternative mRNA splicing or DSB repair in the nucleus. We analyzed 17 available full-length B19V sequences of genotype 1 and found that there are only two sites of the octanucleotide present in the B19V pre-mRNA, namely, ISE2 and ISE3.
In conclusion, the RBM45-binding GGGACGGU octanucleotide is conservative in the pre-mRNA of B19V, which plays an essential role in production of the 11-kDa-encoding mRNA. The identification of the RBM45-binding octanucleotide may have a profound impact on determining which of certain cellular functions or disease conditions are dependent on RBM45.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement.
Primary CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells were isolated from bone marrow of healthy human donors. We purchased the cells at AllCells (AllCells LLC, Alameda, CA). All of the cell source data were anonymized; therefore, the requirement of an institutional review board (IRB) review was waived.
Primary cells and cell lines. (i) Primary human CD36+ erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs).
Primary human CD36+ EPCs were expanded ex vivo from CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells as previously described (53, 63, 64). Briefly, hematopoietic CD34+ stem cells were grown in Wong medium (63, 64) under normoxia conditions (21% O2; 5% CO2) up to day 4 and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For each experiment, day 4 cells were thawed and cultured for 2 to 3 days in an expansion medium under normoxic conditions. On day 6 or 7, cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) for 2 days and subjected to experiments.
(ii) UT7/Epo-S1 cells.
Human UT7/Epo-S1 cells, representing a megakaryoblastoid cell line that is permissive to B19V infection (65), were cultured under normoxic conditions at 37°C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 U/ml erythropoietin (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Virus and infection.
A B19V viremic plasma sample (P489) was provided from ViraCor Eurofins Laboratories (Lee’s Summit, MO) and contained 1012 viral genome copies (vgc) per ml. CD36+ EPCs were infected with B19V at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1,000 vgc/cell (64). The infected cells and media were collected at 2 to 3 days postinfection for Western blotting, Southern blotting, and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) (37).
Plasmid constructions. (i) ISE3 silent mutation M20 clone (pM20ISE3-mut7).
In B19V infectious clone pM20 (containing a dsDNA B19V genome), silent mutations (underlined) (5′-GGA AGG CGA CTG GCA GAT-3′) were introduced into the ISE3-corresponding DNA sequence, as indicated in Fig. 8C.
(ii) pLKO constructs.
Lentiviral vector pLKO.1 was used with an mCherry reporter (66) to clone shRNA sequences between the AgeI and EcoRI sites. pLKO.1 containing a scramble shRNA sequence was used as a control (64). The following shRNA sequence (corresponding to shRBM45) was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) for knocking down RBM45: 5′-CCG GCC TTC ATT GAT GAT GGA AGT ACT CGA GTA CTT CCA TCA TCA ATG AAG GTT TTT TG-3′.
(iii) pLenti-optRBM45RRM2-HOA-NLS-Flag construct.
pLenti vector was used to clone an optimized RBM45 ORF between restriction sites XbaI and SpeI, as described previously (52).
(iv) Bacterial expression plasmids.
A whole or partial ORF of RBM45 coding sequence was amplified from plasmid pDONR223_RBM45_WT (purchased at Addgene; catalog no. 82892) and cloned into the pET30a (+) vector between the NdeI and XhoI restriction sites. The full-length and truncated RBM45 proteins, as indicated in Fig. 6A, were expressed with a 6×His tag and purified using nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) beads, as described below.
Transfection.
Two million UT7/Epo-S1 cells were electroporated with 2 μg of SalI-linearized B19V infectious clone pM20 (67) or pM20ISE3-mut7 in solution V using an Amaxa Nucleofector system (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), as described previously (37, 68).
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR.
Total RNA was extracted from infected or transfected cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and cDNA was synthesized using a Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The multiplex RT-qPCR system for quantification of B19V-specific mRNAs has been described previously (37).
In vitro transcription.
In vitro transcription was performed as reported previously (37), with some modifications. Briefly, we used forward primers that had an SP6 RNA polymerase promoter sequence (5′-ATT TAG GTG ACA CTA TAG-3′) at the 5′ end to amplify DNA templates from pM20. The B19V DNA was then transcribed into RNA using SP6 RNA polymerase in vitro in the presence of biotin-labeled UTP with biotin-16-UTP (Lucigen, Middleton, WI), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNAs were then purified using an RNA Clean and Concentrator-5 kit (Zymo Research, Tustin, CA), following the protocols provided by the manufacturer. Complementary DNAs that were in vitro transcribed to complementary RNAs served as negative controls.
RNA pulldown assay.
The RNA pulldown assay was performed as described previously (37, 69), with some modifications. The RNAs used in the assay were either generated by in vitro transcription with SP6 polymerase as described above (11-kDa intron, 11-kDa exon, P1, P2, P3, W1, W2, J1, and J2 and their cRNA sequences; see Fig. 4A to D) or chemically synthesized at Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) with biotinylation at the 5′ end (ISE2-WT and ISE2-mut3 [Fig. 1]; ISE3-WT, ISE326nt-mut1 to ISE326nt-mut4, and ISE326nt-com [Fig. 4F and G]; ISE3 and ISE3-mut7 [Fig. 5 and 8, respectively]; and ISE38nt and ISE39nt [Fig. 10]). Briefly, 80 μl of streptavidin-conjugated agarose beads (EMD Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) was washed three times with a wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, SigmaFAST EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma]) and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA)–phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer, and 10 μl of 20 μM biotinylated RNA was added. The mixtures were slowly rotated for 3 h at 4°C. The beads were spun down, washed, and resuspended in 500 μl of RNA binding buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 300 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), poly(I·C) at 5 μg/ml, proteinase and RNase inhibitors] and 100 μl of nuclear lysate of UT7/Epo-S1 cells or approximately equal amounts of purified proteins. The mixtures were rotated overnight, and the beads were spun down and washed. Bound proteins were suspended in an appropriate volume of 2× Laemmli loading buffer and boiled for 5 to 10 min and were then separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by mass spectrometry or immunoblotting.
Western blotting.
Western blotting was performed as described previously (37, 53, 70, 71). Briefly, the cell lysates or other protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, which was blocked and probed with primary and secondary antibodies sequentially. Signals were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence, and images were developed under a Fuji LAS3000 imaging system.
Mass spectrometry.
Protein bands differentially detected in SDS-PAGE that corresponded to the samples pulled down by ISE2-WT RNA but not those pulled down by ISE2-mut3 RNA were excised and subjected to protein identification using microcapillary reverse high-performance liquid chromatography–nanoscale electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (μLC-MS/MS) on a Finnigan LCQ quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer at the Taplin Biological Mass Spectrometry Facility, Harvard University (Cambridge, MA).
Immunofluorescence.
B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs were collected spun onto slides at 1,800 rpm for 5 min using a Cytospin centrifuge. After being fixed and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100, the slides were then blocked and probed with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-RBM45 antibodies (Abclonal; catalog no. A13843) and mouse anti-B19V capsid antibodies (Millipore; catalog no. MAB8293), followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies. The slides were visualized under a 63× oil lens objective with a Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope. DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was used to stain the nucleus.
Proximity ligation assay.
Proximity ligation assay (PLA) was performed using a Duolink PLA kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (66). Briefly, infected CD36+ EPCs were fixed, permeabilized as described above, and blocked with Duolink blocking buffer for 30 min. The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies (rabbit anti-RBM45 and mouse anti-B19V capsid antibodies) for 1 h. The PLA probe incubation, ligation, and amplification processes were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the cells were washed and mounted with Duolink in situ mounting medium with DAPI and visualized under the 63× oil lens objective with a Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope.
BrdU incorporation assay and flow cytometry.
For cell cycle analysis of CD36+ EPCs, a bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay was performed to determine the percentage of the cell population in S phase, followed by flow cytometry analysis, as reported previously (70).
Northern blotting.
Northern blot analysis was performed as previously described (72, 73). In brief, total RNA was extracted from pM20-transfected or pM20ISE3-mut7-transfected UT7/Epo-S1 cells by the use of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). A 5-μg volume of the total RNA was separated on a denatured 1.4% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide (EB) staining. The stained 28S ribosome RNA band served as a loading control. For the detection of 11-kDa mRNA, the blot was hybridized with a [32P]dCTP-labeled DNA cap probe (nt 4619 to 5147), which was amplified from pM20 by PCR. Hybridization signals were captured by the use of a storage phosphor screen and visualized on a Typhoon FLA 9000 biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare). Quantification of the bands was carried out using ImageQuant TL 8.1 software (GE Healthcare).
Southern blotting.
Hirt DNA (lower-molecular-weight DNA) was extracted from either B19V dsDNA genome (pM20)-transfected UT7/Epo-S1 cells or B19V-infected CD36+ EPCs, as reported previously (37, 68). B19V RF DNA M20 excised from SalI-digested pM20 was used as a probe. The blots were reprobed for mitochondrial DNA (Mito-DNA) using a specific probe (74). Hybridization signals were captured by the use of the Typhoon FLA 9000 biomolecular imager, and quantification of the bands was carried out using ImageQuant TL.
Biolayer interferometry assay.
Biolayer interferometry (BLI) was performed as reported (37), with minor modifications. Briefly, biotinylated RNA was mounted onto streptavidin biosensors (catalog no. 18-5019; Forte Bio Inc., Fremont, CA), equilibrated with RNA binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 80 mM NaCl), and then dipped into the binding buffer containing purified BM45 at different concentrations. Binding parameters Kass (association rate constant) and Kdiss (dissociation rate constant) were generated from Blitz Pro software. KD (equilibrium dissociation constant) values were calculated by dividing Kass with Kdiss.
Lentivirus production and transduction.
Lentiviruses were produced according to instructions provided by Addgene (https://www.addgene.org/protocols/lentivirus-production/) and were concentrated as described previously (64). UT7/Epo-S1 cells or CD36+ EPCs were transduced with the lentiviral vector at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 5 transduction units per cell, as described previously (64).
Protein purification.
The cloned pET30a (+) plasmids were transformed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)/pLysS cells (Promega, Madison, WI). The transformation reaction mixtures were inoculated in 5 ml of 2× YT medium containing 25 μg/ml of kanamycin and cultured overnight at 37°C in an incubator shaker at 250 rpm. A 5-ml volume of each culture was used to inoculate 1 liter of 2× YT medium containing 25 μg/ml of kanamycin. When the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of bacterial culture reached approximately 0.4 to 0.6, IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside; final concentration of 0.5 mM) was added to the media and the culture was grown for another 2 to 3 h at 37°C or overnight at 16°C. His-tagged recombinant proteins were purified as described previously (37). The purified proteins were stored at −80°C for use.
Antibodies used.
The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-RBM45 (ab123912 [for Western blotting]) and rabbit anti-DHX37 (ab70778) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA); rabbit anti-RBM45 (A13843 [for immunofluorescence]), rabbit anti-MCM7 (A1138), rabbit anti-hnRNP D (A15679), rabbit anti-PURA (A9296), and rabbit anti-HuR (A19622) from Abclonal (Woburn, MA); rabbit anti-DHX9 (A300-855A), rabbit anti-SF3B1 (A300-996A), rabbit anti-KHSRP (A302-021A), rabbit anti-DDX21 (A300-629A), rabbit anti-LARP7 (A300-724A), rabbit anti-NOP56 (A302-720A), rabbit anti-hnRNP H1 (A300-511A), and rabbit anti-DDX21 (A300-629A) from Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX); rabbit anti-FUBP1 (GTX1045879), rabbit anti-hnRNP R (GTX106526), rabbit anti-hnRNP A2B1 (GTX127928), and rabbit anti-SF2 (GTX114918) from GeneTex (Irvine, CA); rabbit anti-hnRNP G (AP21472C) from Abgent (San Diego, CA); rabbit anti-hnRNP A3 (25142-1-AP) from Proteintech Group Inc. (Chicago, IL); mouse anti-β-actin (A5441) from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO); mouse anti-B19V capsid (MAB8292) from Millipore (Billerica, MA); rabbit anti-GST (2625T) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); and mouse anti-Flag (2001-301-B13) from Rockland (Limerick, PA). Rat anti-11-kDa protein and anti-NS1 antibodies were produced in-house, as described previously (29).
The secondary antibodies used were horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (A4416) and HRP-conjugated anti-rat IgG (A9037) from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO) and HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (sc-2357) from Santa Cruz (Dallas, TX).
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was done by using GraphPad Prism version 8.0. Error bars represent means and standard deviations (SD), and statistical significance P values were determined by using Student's t test. Statistical significance is indicated (****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; n.s, no statistical significance). For cell cycle analysis, the percentage of cells in S phase was determined from the results of at least three independent experiments. For RT-qPCR analysis, quantified viral mRNA levels were normalized to the level of β-actin mRNA, and the value representing mRNAs extracted from control cells was arbitrarily set at 1, with at least three independent experiments performed.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to members of the Qiu laboratory for technical support and valuable discussions. We are indebted to Xingmin Shi for his participation in some of the experiments. We acknowledge the members of the Confocal Microscopy Core Laboratory of The University of Kansas Medical Center for help in confocal microscopy.
This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI070723 and R21AI139572 to J.Q.) and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31602056 to J.W.). The confocal core is supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (P30GM122731). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Funding for open access charge was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R21AI139572).
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Jianming Qiu, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Zhi-Ming Zheng, NIH, and Giorgio Gallinella, University of Bologna.
Citation Wang J, Ganaie SS, Cheng F, Xu P, Ning K, Wang X, Kleiboeker S, Cheng S, Qiu J. 2020. RNA binding motif protein RBM45 regulates expression of the 11-kilodalton protein of parvovirus B19 through binding to novel intron splicing enhancers. mBio 11:e00192-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00192-20.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cotmore SF, Agbandje-McKenna M, Chiorini JA, Mukha DV, Pintel DJ, Qiu J, Söderlund-Venermo M, Tattersall P, Tijssen P, Gatherer D, Davison AJ. 2014. The family Parvoviridae. Arch Virol 159:1239–1247. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1914-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deiss V, Tratschin JD, Weitz M, Siegl G. 1990. Cloning of the human parvovirus B19 genome and structural analysis of its palindromic termini. Virology 175:247–254. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Astell CR, Blundell MC. 1989. Sequence of the right hand terminal palindrome of the human B19 parvovirus genome has the potential to form a ‘stem plus arms’ structure. Nucleic Acids Res 17:5857. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.14.5857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shade RO, Blundell MC, Cotmore SF, Tattersall P, Astell CR. 1986. Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of human parvovirus B19 isolated from the serum of a child during aplastic crisis. J Virol 58:921–936. doi: 10.1128/JVI.58.3.921-936.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ozawa K, Kurtzman G, Young N. 1986. Replication of the B19 parvovirus in human bone marrow cell cultures. Science 233:883–886. doi: 10.1126/science.3738514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Srivastava A, Lu L. 1988. Replication of B19 parvovirus in highly enriched hematopoietic progenitor cells from normal human bone marrow. J Virol 62:3059–3063. doi: 10.1128/JVI.62.8.3059-3063.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yaegashi N, Niinuma T, Chisaka H, Uehara S, Moffatt S, Tada K, Iwabuchi M, Matsunaga Y, Nakayama M, Yutani C, Osamura Y, Hirayama E, Okamura K, Sugamura K, Yajima A. 1999. Parvovirus B19 infection induces apoptosis of erythroid cells in vitro and in vivo. J Infect 39:68–76. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(99)90105-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Serjeant GR, Topley JM, Mason K, Serjeant BE, Pattison JR, Jones SE, Mohamed R. 1981. Outbreak of aplastic crises in sickle cell anaemia associated with parvovirus-like agent. Lancet ii:595–597. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92739-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pattison JR, Jones SE, Hodgson J, Davis LR, White JM, Stroud CE, Murtaza L. 1981. Parvovirus infections and hypoplastic crisis in sickle-cell anaemia. Lancet i:664–665. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)91579-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Young NS, Mortimer PP, Moore JG, Humphries RK. 1984. Characterization of a virus that causes transient aplastic crisis. J Clin Invest 73:224–230. doi: 10.1172/JCI111195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saarinen UM, Chorba TL, Tattersall P, Young NS, Anderson LJ, Palmer E, Coccia PF. 1986. Human parvovirus B19-induced epidemic acute red cell aplasia in patients with hereditary hemolytic anemia. Blood 67:1411–1417. doi: 10.1182/blood.V67.5.1411.bloodjournal6751411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nour B, Green M, Michaels M, Reyes J, Tzakis A, Gartner JC, McLoughlin L, Starzl TE. 1993. Parvovirus B19 infection in pediatric transplant patients. Transplantation 56:835–838. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Griffin TC, Squires JE, Timmons CF, Buchanan GR. 1991. Chronic human parvovirus B19-induced erythroid hypoplasia as the initial manifestation of human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Pediatr 118:899–901. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gahr M, Pekrun A, Eiffert H. 1991. Persistence of parvovirus B19-DNA in blood of a child with severe combined immunodeficiency associated with chronic pure red cell aplasia. Eur J Pediatr 150:470–472. doi: 10.1007/bf01958424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Frickhofen N, Abkowitz JL, Safford M, Berry JM, Antunez-de-Mayolo J, Astrow A, Cohen R, Halperin I, King L, Mintzer D, Cohen B, Young NS. 1990. Persistent B19 parvovirus infection in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1): a treatable cause of anemia in AIDS. Ann Intern Med 113:926–933. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Mayolo JA, Temple JD. 1990. Pure red cell aplasia due to parvovirus B19 infection in a man with HIV infection. South Med J 83:1480–1481. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199012000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kurtzman GJ, Ozawa K, Cohen B, Hanson G, Oseas R, Young NS. 1987. Chronic bone marrow failure due to persistent B19 parvovirus infection. N Engl J Med 317:287–294. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707303170506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rotbart HA. 1990. Human parvovirus infections. Annu Rev Med 41:25–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.41.020190.000325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weiland HT, Vermey-Keers C, Salimans MM, Fleuren GJ, Verwey RA, Anderson MJ. 1987. Parvovirus B19 associated with fetal abnormality. Lancet i:682–683. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90442-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carrington D, Gilmore DH, Whittle MJ, Aitken D, Gibson AA, Patrick WJ, Brown T, Caul EO, Field AM, Clewley JP, Cohen BJ. 1987. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein--a marker of fetal aplastic crisis during intrauterine human parvovirus infection. Lancet i:433–435. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90129-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Jong EP, de Haan TR, Kroes AC, Beersma MF, Oepkes D, Walther FJ. 2006. Parvovirus B19 infection in pregnancy. J Clin Virol 36:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Al-Khan A, Caligiuri A, Apuzzio J. 2003. Parvovirus B-19 infection during pregnancy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 11:175–179. doi: 10.1080/10647440300025518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bonvicini F, Bua G, Gallinella G. 2017. Parvovirus B19 infection in pregnancy-awareness and opportunities. Curr Opin Virol 27:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brown KE, Young N. 1997. Human parvovirus B19: pathogenesis of disease, p 105–119. In: Anderson LJ, Young N (ed), Human parvovirus B19, vol 20 Karger, Basel, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Young NS, Brown KE. 2004. Parvovirus B19. N Engl J Med 350:586–597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra030840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chisaka H, Morita E, Yaegashi N, Sugamura K. 2003. Parvovirus B19 and the pathogenesis of anaemia. Rev Med Virol 13:347–359. doi: 10.1002/rmv.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moffatt S, Yaegashi N, Tada K, Tanaka N, Sugamura K. 1998. Human parvovirus B19 nonstructural (NS1) protein induces apoptosis in erythroid lineage cells. J Virol 72:3018–3028. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.4.3018-3028.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sol N, Le JJ, Vassias I, Freyssinier JM, Thomas A, Prigent AF, Rudkin BB, Fichelson S, Morinet F. 1999. Possible interactions between the NS-1 protein and tumor necrosis factor alpha pathways in erythroid cell apoptosis induced by human parvovirus B19. J Virol 73:8762–8770. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8762-8770.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen AY, Zhang EY, Guan W, Cheng F, Kleiboeker S, Yankee TM, Qiu J. 2010. The small 11kDa non-structural protein of human parvovirus B19 plays a key role in inducing apoptosis during B19 virus infection of primary erythroid progenitor cells. Blood 115:1070–1080. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-215756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu P, Zhou Z, Xiong M, Zou W, Deng X, Ganaie SS, Kleiboeker S, Peng J, Liu K, Wang S, Ye SQ, Qiu J. 2017. Parvovirus B19 NS1 protein induces cell cycle arrest at G2-phase by activating the ATR-CDC25C-CDK1 pathway. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006266. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ozawa K, Ayub J, Hao YS, Kurtzman G, Shimada T, Young N. 1987. Novel transcription map for the B19 (human) pathogenic parvovirus. J Virol 61:2395–2406. doi: 10.1128/JVI.61.8.2395-2406.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Luo W, Astell CR. 1993. A novel protein encoded by small RNAs of parvovirus B19. Virology 195:448–455. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.St Amand J, Astell CR. 1993. Identification and characterization of a family of 11-kDa proteins encoded by the human parvovirus B19. Virology 192:121–131. doi: 10.1006/viro.1993.1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qiu J, Söderlund-Venermo M, Young NS. 2017. Human parvoviruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 30:43–113. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00040-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhi N, Mills IP, Lu J, Wong S, Filippone C, Brown KE. 2006. Molecular and functional analyses of a human parvovirus B19 infectious clone demonstrates essential roles for NS1, VP1, and the 11-kilodalton protein in virus replication and infectivity. J Virol 80:5941–5950. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02430-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lou S, Luo Y, Cheng F, Huang Q, Shen W, Kleiboeker S, Tisdale JF, Liu Z, Qiu J. 2012. Human parvovirus B19 DNA replication induces a DNA damage response that is dispensable for cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase. J Virol 86:10748–10758. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01007-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ganaie SS, Chen AY, Huang C, Xu P, Du A, Kleiboeker S, Qiu J. 2018. RNA binding protein RBM38 regulates expression of the 11-kDa protein of parvovirus B19 which facilitates viral DNA replication. J Virol 92:e02050-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02050-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu P, Chen AY, Ganaie SS, Cheng F, Shen W, Wang X, Kleiboeker S, Li Y, Qiu J. 2018. The nonstructural protein 11-kDa of human parvovirus B19 facilitates viral DNA replication by interacting with Grb2 through its proline-rich motifs. J Virol 92:e01464-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01464-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guan W, Cheng F, Yoto Y, Kleiboeker S, Wong S, Zhi N, Pintel DJ, Qiu J. 2008. Block to the production of full-length B19 virus transcripts by internal polyadenylation is overcome by replication of the viral genome. J Virol 82:9951–9963. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01162-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guan W, Huang Q, Cheng F, Qiu J. 2011. Internal polyadenylation of the parvovirus B19 precursor mRNA is regulated by alternative splicing. J Biol Chem 286:24793–24805. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.227439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Guan W, Cheng F, Huang Q, Kleiboeker S, Qiu J. 2011. Inclusion of the central exon of parvovirus B19 precursor mRNA is determined by multiple splicing enhancers both in the exon and the downstream intron. J Virol 85:2463–2468. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01708-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Y, Collins M, Geiser R, Bakkar N, Riascos D, Bowser R. 2015. RBM45 homo-oligomerization mediates association with ALS-linked proteins and stress granules. Sci Rep 5:14262. doi: 10.1038/srep14262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mashiko T, Sakashita E, Kasashima K, Tominaga K, Kuroiwa K, Nozaki Y, Matsuura T, Hamamoto T, Endo H. 2016. Developmentally regulated RNA-binding protein 1 (Drb1)/RNA-binding motif protein 45 (RBM45), a nuclear-Cytoplasmic trafficking protein, forms TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-mediated cytoplasmic aggregates. J Biol Chem 291:14996–15007. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.712232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gong J, Huang M, Wang F, Ma X, Liu H, Tu Y, Xing L, Zhu X, Zheng H, Fang J, Li X, Wang Q, Wang J, Sun Z, Wang X, Wang Y, Guo C, Tang TS. 2017. RBM45 competes with HDAC1 for binding to FUS in response to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 45:12862–12876. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Collins M, Riascos D, Kovalik T, An J, Krupa K, Krupa K, Hood BL, Conrads TP, Renton AE, Traynor BJ, Bowser R. 2012. The RNA-binding motif 45 (RBM45) protein accumulates in inclusion bodies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions (FTLD-TDP) patients. Acta Neuropathol 124:717–732. doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1045-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tamada H, Sakashita E, Shimazaki K, Ueno E, Hamamoto T, Kagawa Y, Endo H. 2002. cDNA cloning and characterization of Drb1, a new member of RRM-type neural RNA-binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 297:96–104. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li Y, Collins M, An J, Geiser R, Tegeler T, Tsantilas K, Garcia K, Pirrotte P, Bowser R. 2016. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry defines an extensive RBM45 protein-protein interaction network. Brain Res 1647:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Busch A, Hertel KJ. 2012. Evolution of SR protein and hnRNP splicing regulatory factors. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 3:1–12. doi: 10.1002/wrna.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Will CL, Schneider C, MacMillan AM, Katopodis NF, Neubauer G, Wilm M, Luhrmann R, Query CC. 2001. A novel U2 and U11/U12 snRNP protein that associates with the pre-mRNA branch site. EMBO J 20:4536–4546. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.16.4536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Roychowdhury A, Joret C, Bourgeois G, Heurgue-Hamard V, Lafontaine DLJ, Graille M. 2019. The DEAH-box RNA helicase Dhr1 contains a remarkable carboxyl terminal domain essential for small ribosomal subunit biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 47:7548–7563. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miro J, Laaref AM, Rofidal V, Lagrafeuille R, Hem S, Thorel D, Mechin D, Mamchaoui K, Mouly V, Claustres M, Tuffery-Giraud S. 2015. FUBP1: a new protagonist in splicing regulation of the DMD gene. Nucleic Acids Res 43:2378–2389. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen AY, Kleiboeker S, Qiu J. 2011. Productive parvovirus B19 infection of primary human erythroid progenitor cells at hypoxia is regulated by STAT5A and MEK signaling but not HIF alpha. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002088. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ganaie SS, Zou W, Xu P, Deng X, Kleiboeker S, Qiu J. 2017. Phosphorylated STAT5 directly facilitates parvovirus B19 DNA replication in human erythroid progenitors through interaction with the MCM complex. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006370. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Das BK, Xia L, Palandjian L, Gozani O, Chyung Y, Reed R. 1999. Characterization of a protein complex containing spliceosomal proteins SAPs 49, 130, 145, and 155. Mol Cell Biol 19:6796–6802. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.10.6796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Das R, Zhou Z, Reed R. 2000. Functional association of U2 snRNP with the ATP-independent spliceosomal complex E. Mol Cell 5:779–787. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80318-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Will CL, Urlaub H, Achsel T, Gentzel M, Wilm M, Luhrmann R. 2002. Characterization of novel SF3b and 17S U2 snRNP proteins, including a human Prp5p homologue and an SF3b DEAD-box protein. EMBO J 21:4978–4988. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wahl MC, Will CL, Luhrmann R. 2009. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 136:701–718. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Agafonov DE, Deckert J, Wolf E, Odenwalder P, Bessonov S, Will CL, Urlaub H, Luhrmann R. 2011. Semiquantitative proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome via a novel two-dimensional gel electrophoresis method. Mol Cell Biol 31:2667–2682. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05266-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hegele A, Kamburov A, Grossmann A, Sourlis C, Wowro S, Weimann M, Will CL, Pena V, Luhrmann R, Stelzl U. 2012. Dynamic protein-protein interaction wiring of the human spliceosome. Mol Cell 45:567–580. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Heinicke LA, Nabet B, Shen S, Jiang P, van Zalen S, Cieply B, Russell JE, Xing Y, Carstens RP. 2013. The RNA binding protein RBM38 (RNPC1) regulates splicing during late erythroid differentiation. PLoS One 8:e78031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Alvarez-Dominguez JR, Zhang X, Hu W. 2017. Widespread and dynamic translational control of red blood cell development. Blood 129:619–629. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-741835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn H, Adamson J, Kouri N, Wojtas A, Sengdy P, Hsiung GY, Karydas A, Seeley WW, Josephs KA, Coppola G, Geschwind DH, Wszolek ZK, Feldman H, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Miller BL, Dickson DW, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, Rademakers R. 2011. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 72:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wong S, Zhi N, Filippone C, Keyvanfar K, Kajigaya S, Brown KE, Young NS. 2008. Ex vivo-generated CD36+ erythroid progenitors are highly permissive to human parvovirus B19 replication. J Virol 82:2470–2476. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02247-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen AY, Guan W, Lou S, Liu Z, Kleiboeker S, Qiu J. 2010. Role of erythropoietin receptor signaling in parvovirus B19 replication in human erythroid progenitor cells. J Virol 84:12385–12396. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01229-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Morita E, Tada K, Chisaka H, Asao H, Sato H, Yaegashi N, Sugamura K. 2001. Human parvovirus B19 induces cell cycle arrest at G(2) phase with accumulation of mitotic cyclins. J Virol 75:7555–7563. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7555-7563.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Deng X, Yan Z, Cheng F, Engelhardt JF, Qiu J. 2016. Replication of an autonomous human parvovirus in non-dividing human airway epithelium is facilitated through the DNA damage and repair pathways. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005399. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhi N, Zadori Z, Brown KE, Tijssen P. 2004. Construction and sequencing of an infectious clone of the human parvovirus B19. Virology 318:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zou W, Wang Z, Xiong M, Chen AY, Xu P, Ganaie SS, Badawi Y, Kleiboeker S, Nishimune H, Ye SQ, Qiu J. 2018. Human parvovirus B19 utilizes cellular DNA replication machinery for viral DNA replication. J Virol 92:e01881-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01881-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Barnes C, Kanhere A. 2016. Identification of RNA-protein interactions through in vitro RNA pull-down assays. Methods Mol Biol 1480:99–113. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6380-5_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Luo Y, Kleiboeker S, Deng X, Qiu J. 2013. Human parvovirus B19 infection causes cell cycle arrest of human erythroid progenitors at late S phase that favors viral DNA replication. J Virol 87:12766–12775. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02333-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lin P, Cheng Y, Song S, Qiu J, Yi L, Cao Z, Li J, Cheng S, Wang J. 2019. Viral nonstructural protein 1 induces mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis in mink enteritis virus infection. J Virol 93:e01249-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01249-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Qiu J, Cheng F, Burger LR, Pintel D. 2006. The transcription profile of Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) in CRFK cells is generated by alternative processing of pre-mRNAs produced from a single promoter. J Virol 80:654–662. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.654-662.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu Z, Qiu J, Cheng F, Chu Y, Yoto Y, O'Sullivan MG, Brown KE, Pintel DJ. 2004. Comparison of the transcription profile of simian parvovirus with that of the human erythrovirus B19 reveals a number of unique features. J Virol 78:12929–12939. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.12929-12939.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xu P, Ganaie SS, Wang X, Wang Z, Kleiboeker S, Horton NC, Heier RF, Meyers MJ, Tavis JE, Qiu J. 2018. Endonuclease activity inhibtion of the NS1 proetin of parvovirus B19 as a novel target for antiviral drug development. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01879-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01879-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.