Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2019 Dec 20;54(3):205–216. doi: 10.1111/medu.14025

Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review

Marjolein Versteeg 1,2,, Renée A Hendriks 2, Aliki Thomas 3,4,5, Belinda W C Ommering 2, Paul Steendijk 1,2
PMCID: PMC7064953  PMID: 31860936

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the definitions and applications of ‘spaced learning’ and to propose future directions for advancing its study and practice in health professions education.

Method

The authors searched five online databases for articles published on spaced learning in health professions education prior to February 2018. Two researchers independently screened articles for eligibility with set inclusion criteria. They extracted and analysed key data using both quantitative and qualitative methods.

Results

Of the 2972 records retrieved, 120 articles were included in the review. More than 90% of these articles were published in the last 10 years. The definition of spaced learning varied widely and was often not theoretically grounded. Spaced learning was applied in distinct contexts, including online learning, simulation training and classroom settings. There was a large variety of spacing formats, ranging from dispersion of information or practice on a single day, to intervals lasting several months. Generally, spaced learning was implemented in practice or testing phases and rarely during teaching.

Conclusions

Spaced learning is infrequently and poorly defined in the health professions education literature. We propose a comprehensive definition of spaced learning and emphasise that detailed descriptions of spacing formats are needed in future research to facilitate the operationalisation of spaced learning research and practice in health professions education.

Short abstract

Digging into the educationally strategic phenomenon of spaced learning, the authors discover variety that leads them to propose a comprehensive definition and emphasise that detailed format descriptions are needed to facilitate further development.

1. INTRODUCTION

The spacing effect is one of the most robust phenomena in the science of learning. Hundreds of published reports have replicated the spacing effect, originally uncovered by Ebbinghaus, which suggests that knowledge retention is enhanced when learning sessions are spaced.1, 2 Re‐exposing learners to information over time using temporal intervals (ie spaced learning) results in more effective storage of information than if it was all provided at a single time (ie massed learning). There is mounting evidence that students do not remember what is learned, also in health professions education (HPE).3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Researchers have therefore indicated a need to invest time and resources in helping learners retain the information being learned.7 Educational principles grounded in a spaced learning approach have the potential to address this growing challenge in HPE.

Although literature reviews on effective learning in HPE exist and suggest a key role for spaced learning in optimising retention, systematic analysis of spaced learning research is complicated by the great diversity in the terms and definitions used in this literature, including ‘distributed practice’, ‘spaced education’, and ‘retrieval practice.’8, 9, 10, 11, 12 The variety of learning and assessment methods that are referred to as spaced learning further complicate the analysis of its effects. According to definitions used by psychologists, spaced learning should include learning sessions that are spaced over time and include repeated information.13 Both cumulative testing and simulation training as performed in HPE, for instance, can be considered applications of spaced learning. In addition to the variety of educational activities, spacing formats often differ in terms of their temporality, with some researchers distributing learning sessions over a few days, whereas others use hours, weeks or months. Moreover, it is often unclear if researchers used evidence from empirical research or relied on a theoretical framework to inform their spacing format. Overall, the broad range of terms associated with spaced learning, the multiple definitions and variety of applications used in HPE can hinder the operationalisation of spaced learning.

A comprehensive synthesis of the various definitions and applications of spaced learning in HPE may help identify gaps in knowledge, highlight areas for future research and support a more effective implementation of spaced learning in the HPE curricula. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to investigate how spaced learning is defined and applied across HPE contexts.

2. METHODS

We employed a scoping review methodology to examine the definitions and applications of spaced learning in HPE. To execute the review in a rigorous manner, we assembled a research team consisting of co‐investigators with in‐depth knowledge of HPE (MV, RAH, AT, BWCO and PS), methodological experience (AT and BWCO),14 and medical library expertise (CP).

We used the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley,14 which was later refined by Levac and colleagues.15 The framework consists of the following six steps: Step 1, identifying the research question; Step 2, identifying relevant articles; Step 3, selecting articles; Step 4, charting the data; Step 5 collating, summarising and reporting the results, and Step 6, consultation. Step 6, consultation, was not conducted as we aimed to study the HPE literature specifically without including additional stakeholders’ perspectives on this matter.

2.1. Identifying the research question

Given our goal of identifying key concepts, and applications of spaced learning, we generated a main research question that allows for a broad exploration of spaced learning. The overarching question guiding this scoping review was as follows: ‘How is spaced learning defined and applied in HPE?’ Accordingly, we sought to answer the following specific research questions: (RQ1A) Which concepts are used to define spaced learning and associated terms? (RQ1B) To what extent do these terms show conceptual overlap? (RQ2) Which theoretical frameworks are used to frame spaced learning? (RQ3) Which spacing formats are utilised in spaced learning research?

2.2. Identifying relevant studies

A university affiliated librarian (CP) was consulted when drafting the search query. An initial brainstorming session with the research team and librarian led to the inclusion of ‘spaced learning’ and possible associated terms, such as ‘spaced training’, ‘spaced education’, ‘distributed practice’, ‘test‐enhanced learning’, and ‘retrieval practice’. The final search was conducted on 28 February 2018 using five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), PsycINFO (Data S1). MV conducted additional forward reference searching of included review articles to identify additional articles.

2.3. Selecting the studies

There was no restriction on year of publication; therefore, all articles published up until 28 February 2018 were screened for eligibility. To be included, articles had to: (a) focus on HPE (eg medicine, nursing, pharmacology), and (b) explicitly name ‘spaced learning’, or any associated term with a spaced study format. We excluded editorials, commentaries, conference abstracts and books, as well as non‐English articles.

Two researchers (MV and RAH) tested the inclusion criteria on a 10% subset of titles.16, 17 A single calibration exercise was sufficient for the team to reach full agreement after inclusion criteria were discussed and clarified. In the abstract screening stage, RAH and MV tested the inclusion criteria using a subset of papers (5%). After reaching full agreement, MV independently screened the remaining abstracts. Two additional calibration exercises were performed with RH independently screening 2.5% of abstracts (n = 34) halfway and again 2.5% (n = 34) at the end of the process to ensure that MV's interpretation of the inclusion criteria was consistent with the original calibration outcome. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. If the focus of the article was unclear based on the title and abstract, the full article was inspected.

2.4. Charting the data

The data charting form was developed by MV and RAH based on the units of analysis included in the research questions (eg definition, theoretical framework, timing of events and setting) using Microsoft® Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). They independently extracted data from five full text articles to pilot the form. The usability of the charting form was discussed and minor modifications were made accordingly (ie extraction categories were added and others were removed). For instance, the ‘intervention design’ category from a previous version of the charting form was merged with the ‘timing of events’ category in the final version. The process was repeated with an additional five full text articles, followed by discussion, resulting in a final extraction form comprised of the following categories: title; author; publication year; location; terms used for spaced learning; definition by researchers; theoretical framework; population; research method; research design; report of evidence‐based spacing; timing of events; topic of learning; type of knowledge; setting; basic sciences/clinical, and learning phase.

2.5. Collating, summarising and reporting the results

2.5.1. Numerical analyses

We performed a numerical analysis to describe the study characteristics (ie year of publication, location, population, educational content, domain, subject), theoretical frameworks (RQ2A) and spacing formats (RQ3A) included in each paper.

2.5.2. Thematic analyses

The variety of spaced learning definitions and associated terms (RQ1A) were synthesised using a thematic analysis. Two researchers (MV, RAH) generated a list of open codes from words or phrases in the definitions. Discussion between the two researchers explored relationships between open codes across definitions, which we refer to as concepts. These concepts were then analysed to generate overarching core themes. Drawing from the previously identified core themes as predetermined categories, we used a deductive approach to search for conceptual overlap amongst terms and definitions (RQ1B). Cross‐checking of coding strategies and interpretation of data was performed by BWCO.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Descriptive summary

The database search resulted in a total of 2972 records (Figure 1). After duplicates were removed, 2184 records remained. After applying title and abstract screening criteria, we identified 270 articles as eligible for full text review. A total of 120 articles met all criteria and were retained for the full review. Of these articles, 109 (91%) were published in the last 10 years (Data S2). Approximately two‐thirds of all studies (n = 76; 63%) were conducted in the United States, 25 in Europe (20%), eight in Canada (7%), seven in Australia (6%), two in Asia (2%) and two in South America (2%). See Data S3 for an overview of the other study characteristics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart for the scoping review selection process

3.2. Definitions of spaced learning

Besides the term ‘spaced learning’, we found 20 associated terms used to define this concept. Some terms were found in multiple studies but were defined differently (eg distributed practice), others were only defined in a single study (eg spaced distribution) or not defined at all (eg spaced retrieval practice). There was a total of 74 definitions (for an extended overview of all definitions see Data S4). These definitions were analysed thematically, resulting in the identification of seven core themes: Educational activity was the most recurrent theme (64/74); followed by Structure (51/74); Timing (44/74); Content (28/74); Repetition (27/44); Learning outcomes (24/74), and Educational tool (14/74). For each core theme, large variation was found amongst definitions, which resulted in a number of sub‐themes (see Table 1). For instance, an ‘educational activity’ was described in terms of what it should entail (eg listening and rereading practicing), or what it should not entail (eg not highlighting, not summarising and not cramming). Additionally, some definitions encompassed specific details about the number of educational activities and the size or the division of labour.

Table 1.

A thematic analysis of definitions of spaced learning and its related terms

First level theme (core theme) Second level theme Third level theme Fourth level theme
Educational activity Number Singular
Plural
Type Reviewing
Reading
Test Short
Multiple choice question
Mastery
Physical
Not achievement
Distractor
Listening
Relearning
Case‐based
Receiving feedback
Practicing
Studying
Learning
Recalling
Not rereading
Not relistening
Not highlighting
Not summarising
Not cramming
Size Curricula
Smaller
Division of labour Providing
Strategy for learning (student‐directed)
Structure Dispersion
Alternation Irregular
Large
Interruption of activity Rest
Not packed together 10‐20 minutes
Not a single time
No dispersion
Adaptive
Content Information and Content Multiple sets
Small
Identical
New
Stimuli
Repetition Rehearsal Three times periodically
Timing Comparative Longer
Later
Adjective Long
Short
Fast
Fixed
Specific duration Days
Weeks
Months
Less than 5 minutes
Other Increasing
Previous
Immediately prior
Concurrently with an activity
Educational tool Multi‐source
Owned by student
Electronic
Online
Gamifications
Learning outcomes Knowledge
Skill
Impact on behaviour
Forgetting Natural
Recall and remember Retention
Silent
Effect More effective Deliberate
  Adaptive
Reducing  

Due to this large variation in definitions, a deductive approach was necessary to study conceptual overlap between terms and this approach was conducted on the core theme level. The recurrent core themes for each of the 21 terms are shown in Table 2. For instance, for the term ‘spaced learning’ we found five definitions all of which included a notion of a certain educational activity, structure and timing.

Table 2.

Overview of the identified core themes in the definitions

Educational activity Structure Timing Repetition Content Educational tool Learning outcomes
Plural definitions
Spaced learning (5)71, 75, 79, 82, 127 5/5 5/5 5/5 4/5 3/5 1/5 2/5
Spaced practice (2)57, 128 2/2 2/2 2/2 1/2 1/2 1/2
Retrieval practice (6)12, 59, 128, 129, 130, 131 6/6 1/6 3/6 1/6 2/6
Distributed practice (19)12, 46, 60, 67, 68, 73, 88, 91, 92, 93, 99, 101, 103, 104, 106, 110, 128, 132, 133, 134, 135 19/19 17/19 14/19 2/19 5/19 4/19
Spaced education (19)19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 34, 35, 36, 44, 47, 52, 53, 54, 78, 81, 85, 114, 136, 137 15/19 15/19 8/19 9/19 8/19 11/19 7/19
Single definition
Spaced approach72 X X X
Distributed training98 X X X
Spaced distribution34, 35, 36, 38 X X X X
Distributed study138 X X X X X X
Spaced repetition116 X X X X X X
Automated spaced repetition18 X X X X X X
Repeated practice68 X X
Structured spaced training86 X X
Interleaved practice21 X X X
Spaced training139 X X X
Interactive‐spaced education140 X X X X X X
Space repetition learning45 X X X X
Interval learning137 X X X X
Interval training141 X X X X
Repeated testing117, 118 X X X X X
Distributed method of learning105 X X X X X X

In case of terms with plural definitions, only core themes recurrent in all definitions are indicated. The number of plural definitions is indicated for each term in brackets. This table only shows the terms with definitions (21 total). Terms identified without definitions were: Dispersed learning;50 Distributed learning;50, 60 Repeated retrieval practice;112 Spaced instruction;49 Spaced training;49 Spaced retrieval practice;66 Spaced studying,142 and Spaced testing.143

3.3. Framing spaced learning

Almost half of the empirical research articles (n = 48, 47%) did not explicitly mention a theoretical framework. In total, nine theoretical frameworks were mentioned in the remaining studies of which the Spacing effect18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 (n = 40) and Testing effect19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 55, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 (n = 31) were named most often. Other frameworks were Cognitive Load Theory50, 57, 67, 68 (n = 4), Desirable Difficulties Theory59, 69 (n = 2), Retrieval hypothesis70, 71 (n = 2), Total‐time hypothesis70, 71 (n = 2), Learning Theory72 (n = 1), Metacognitive Theory73 (n = 1) and Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory61 (n = 1).

Only a few studies26, 31, 32, 33, 34, 39, 40, 41, 56, 60, 64, 69, 74, 75, 76 (n = 15, 15%) based their spacing format on previous empirical research. Articles by Cepeda and colleagues13, 26, 31, 32, 33, 39, 41, 74 (n = 7) and Pashler and colleagues26, 31, 32, 33, 39, 40, 41, 77 (n = 7), both derived from psychological literature on the spacing effect, were cited most often.

3.4. Applying spaced learning

Approximately half of the empirical research articles (n = 51, 48%) applied spaced learning in an online setting, mostly through delivering learning sessions in e‐mails distributed over time using electronic modules, eg, Qstream19, 20, 21, 23, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 47, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 64, 74, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 (n = 38, 37%). Spaced learning was also implemented in simulation settings46, 48, 53, 56, 65, 67, 68, 75, 76, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 (n = 24, 23%), generally used to disperse training sessions over time to stimulate clinical skill acquisition. In total 24 studies49, 50, 58, 59, 60, 61, 65, 66, 70, 72, 73, 95, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 (23%) were conducted in classrooms and applied to various educational activities, ranging from repeated practice and testing of basic science mechanisms, to clinical scenarios and skill training.

The spacing formats of experimental and observational studies were analysed and summarised for the three different settings that were identified previously, that is online, simulation and classroom settings.

For the online setting, the duration of events showed a great variety between studies. Information or questions were distributed through online sources daily22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 37, 55, 85 (n = 10), every 2 days19, 23, 24, 31, 52, 53, 64, 78 (n = 8), every 3 days41 (n = 1), weekly20, 35, 36, 39, 40, 43, 44, 71, 80, 114, 115, 116 (n = 12), every 2 weeks45 (n = 1), or monthly43, 79 (n = 2). In studies explicitly stating that material was not only spaced but also repeated, repetition delays ranged from various days22, 55 (n = 2), to weeks19, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 51, 52, 53, 74, 78, 80, 84, 85 (n = 24), to months19, 30, 32, 33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 54, 64 (n = 12). Additionally, there were large variations in the number of repetitions and intervals between repetitions.

For the simulation setting, studies frequently used designs in which training sessions were distributed within a single day56, 75, 88, 92, 95, 100, 106 (n = 7) or within a set number of consecutive days, weeks or months56, 67, 68, 76, 86, 87, 88, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 106 (n = 15). Notably, there were numerous differences in the number of training sessions, total training time and duration of intervals.

For the classroom setting, most studies described the use of interim (eg cumulative) testing58, 61, 62, 65, 66, 70, 103, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 117, 118, 119 (n = 15) to enhance long‐term retention of to‐be‐learned information. Other applications of spaced learning in the classroom involved the distribution of teaching or learning sessions over multiple days60, 72, 112 (n = 3), weeks49, 50, 59, 73 (n = 3), or months73 (n = 1). It was often unclear if sessions included repetition of material taught during preceding sessions or if each session solely consisted of new material.

Studies were mainly concerned with improving the effectiveness of learning through spacing of practice and/or testing (n = 91, 88%). Only four studies50, 81, 113, 114 (4%) focused efforts on spaced learning as a means of teaching, for example, during conventional lectures.

4. DISCUSSION

We conducted a scoping review to examine how spaced learning is defined and applied in HPE. Spaced learning appeared relatively new to HPE, with 90% of the articles in our review having been published only in the last 10 years. This is an interesting finding given that the first description of the spacing effect dates back to 1885 and has been a major subject of research in the educational psychology literature since.120 Our findings indicate that most spaced learning applications in HPE involve online learning, which may explain the later presence of spaced learning in our field.

In light of the increasing popularity of spaced learning in HPE, it is concerning that descriptions of its applications lack the necessary detail to support implementation or replication. Our review showed that in most research spaced learning is poorly defined and almost half of the studies do not explicitly mention a theoretical framework. Even fewer studies based their spacing formats on empirical literature. It is possible that these shortcomings may be linked to the presence of ‘innovators’ and ‘early adopters’ in our field. According to Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory,121 these groups value the trialability attribute of innovations (ie how easily potential adopters can explore your innovation), which aligns with our findings. All spaced learning studies in HPE that we analysed were conducted in authentic educational environments instead of laboratory settings. As such, the focus may be on improving educational practices and less on advancing theory or knowledge. However, this approach makes replication and follow‐up of current studies on spaced learning challenging. Clearer definitions and detailed descriptions of applications are needed for scholars and educators to improve future research and practice on spaced learning in HPE.

4.1. Defining spaced learning

We examined 74 definitions of spaced learning and associated terms. Concepts found amongst these definitions were organised into seven core themes: Educational activity; Structure; Timing; Repetition; Educational tool, and Learning outcomes. Most terms were defined by unique combinations of core themes resulting in low conceptual overlap between terms. Additionally, some terms seemed to relate to a more specified version of spaced learning as they contained more core themes than others. For instance, the definition of ‘spaced repetition’ includes the notion of ‘reviewing of content multiple times over optimised time intervals’, whereas ‘spaced approach’ limits itself to stating ‘the distribution of fixed teaching hours over a longer time period.’ It is important to note that the core themes were derived from a large variety of second to fourth level themes, illustrating the vagueness of definitions. For example, the educational activity as mentioned in the definition of ‘spaced distribution’, concerns the number of activities, whereas a definition of ‘spaced learning’ focuses on the type of activities (ie tests). Although they both say something about learning engagement, they differ in what information they deem relevant.

Furthermore, different definitions of the same term typically showed few recurrent core themes suggesting low conceptual overlap. For example, we found that the five definitions of the term ‘spaced learning’ shared the following core themes: Educational activity; Structure, and Timing; whereas Education tool was only found in one of the definitions.

Clearly, there is no unified definition of spaced learning in the HPE literature. We suggest that a more consistent use of terminology can facilitate a more systematic appraisal of future research. Based on our findings we propose the following comprehensive definition of spaced learning, which explicitly covers all involved components:

Spaced learning involves [specified] educational encounters that are devoted to the same [specified] material, and distributed over a [specified] number of periods separated by a [specified] interstudy interval, with a [specified] learning outcome after a [specified] retention interval.

These components should be clearly specified for each study on spaced learning to facilitate comparison and crosstalk between spaced learning researchers in our community.

4.2. Framing spaced learning

There is room for improvement regarding framing of the spaced learning concept as almost half of the articles did not explicitly frame their research using a theoretical framework. This might be related to the diversity and vagueness amongst terms used to define spaced learning, which may have complicated researchers’ search for previous empirical research and associated theoretical frameworks. These findings are illustrative of the general underuse of theory in HPE research.122, 123 Importantly, use of theory can help educators and researchers to better understand existing problems and formulate new research questions.

4.3. Applying spaced learning

Spaced learning is applied broadly in HPE, spanning various health professions, subjects, and educational settings (ie online, simulation and classroom). Exploring the specific details of its applications was rather challenging due to the absence of vital information on used spacing formats such as the number and duration of intervals between educational encounters, the duration of the retention interval, and the number and duration of learning sessions. We emphasise that in future research, spacing formats should be reported in detail to ensure reproducibility and generalisability of the outcomes.124, 125

During educational encounters, spacing formats mostly included spaced learning in the testing or practice phase. The occurrence of the ‘testing effect’ as the second most used theoretical framework fits this application pattern. Notably, less research is conducted on the benefits of spaced learning in the instructional phase, that is during teaching. We consider this a gap in the literature and propose that HPE may draw from the rich scientific literature on spaced learning in education and psychology to develop spaced learning formats that can optimise the retention of knowledge. Psychological and neuroscientific research findings on the mechanisms of memory formation suggest that spaced learning also works using shorter intervals.126 Therefore, applying spaced learning on the timescale of minutes to hours may have implications for current massed learning in classroom settings, such as conventional lectures, which still holds a prominent position in HPE worldwide. Ultimately, implementing and optimising spaced learning formats across curricula may help to prepare health professionals with a solid foundational body of knowledge.

4.4. Limitations

Although we attempted to be as thorough as possible, our search was limited to the selected databases, search terms and English‐written scholarly articles, which may have excluded relevant articles inadvertently. Furthermore, as a scoping review aims to investigate the nature and extent of the research topic, we did not critically appraise the included studies.

5. CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has highlighted the large variety in definitions and applications of spaced learning across HPE. Based on our findings and our review of the psychological and neuroscientific literature, we offer the following recommendations to improve research and educational practice related to spaced learning: (a) define the spaced learning concept in an explicit and comprehensive manner in order to stimulate consistent application; (b) use study designs that are described thoroughly and informed by empirical research on spaced learning, related theories, and practices, and (c) further expand the spaced learning applications beyond online learning and simulation training, for example, by applying spaced learning in the instructional phase. With these recommendations, we aim to promote an enriched understanding of spaced learning and support the development of optimal spaced learning environments in HPE curricula.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Researchers MV and RAH performed the conception and design of the work, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the work. Researchers AT, BWCO and PS contributed to the interpretation of data, drafting and revision of the work. All authors (MV, RAH, AT, BWCO and PS) give their final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Reported as not applicable.

Supporting information

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank C. Pees and M.C.J. Timmer for their involvement in the project.

Versteeg M, Hendriks RA, Thomas A, Ommering BWC, Steendijk P. Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review. Med Educ. 2020;54:205–216. 10.1111/medu.14025

REFERENCES

  • 1. Cepeda NJ, Coburn N, Rohrer D, Wixted JT, Mozer MC, Pashler H. Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. Exp Psychol. 2009;56:236‐246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Carpenter SK, Cepeda NJ, Rohrer D, Kang SH, Pashler H. Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;24:369‐378. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Schneid SD, Pashler H, Armour C. How much basic science content do second‐year medical students remember from their first year? Med Teach. 2018;41:231‐233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weggemans MM, Custers EJ, ten Cate OTJ. Unprepared retesting of first year knowledge: how much do second year medical students remember? Med Sci Educ. 2017;27:597‐605. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Simanton E, Hansen L. Long‐term retention of information across the undergraduate medical school curriculum. South Dakota Med. 2012;65:261‐263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sullivan PB, Gregg N, Adams E, Rodgers C, Hull J. How much of the paediatric core curriculum do medical students remember? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18:365‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Marcel FD. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yeh DD, Park YS. Improving learning efficiency of factual knowledge in medical education. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:882‐889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Augustin M. How to learn effectively in medical school: test yourself, learn actively, and repeat in intervals. Yale J Biol Med. 2014;87:207‐212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Friedlander MJ, Andrews L, Armstrong EG, et al. What can medical education learn from the neurobiology of learning? Acad Med. 2011;86:415‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Phillips JL, Heneka N, Bhattarai P, Fraser C, Shaw T. Effectiveness of the spaced education pedagogy for clinicians’ continuing professional development: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2019;53:886‐902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Van Hoof TJ, Doyle TJ. Learning science as a potential new source of understanding and improvement for continuing education and continuing professional development. Med Teach. 2018;40:880‐885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cepeda NJ, Vul E, Rohrer D, Wixted JT, Pashler H. Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:1095‐1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19‐32. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mateen F, Oh J, Tergas A, Bhayani N, Kamdar B. Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:89‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92:161‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Al‐Rawi W, Easterling L, Edwards PC. Development of a mobile device optimized cross platform‐compatible oral pathology and radiology spaced repetition system for dental education. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:439‐447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Boespflug A, Guerra J, Dalle S, Thomas L. Enhancement of customary dermoscopy education with spaced education e‐learning: a prospective controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:847‐853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bruckel J, Carballo V, Kalibatas O, et al. Use of spaced education to deliver a curriculum in quality, safety and value for postgraduate medical trainees: trainee satisfaction and knowledge. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92:137‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dobson JL. Effect of selected “desirable difficulty” learning strategies on the retention of physiology information. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35:378‐383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Flett KB, Bousvaros A, Carpenter J, Millrinen CE, Martin P, Sandora TJ. Reducing redundant anaerobic therapy through spaced education and antimicrobial stewardship interventions. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;7:317‐322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gandhi M, Beasley A, Vinas E, Sangi‐Haghpeykar H, Ramin SM, Kilpatrick CC. Electronic learning‐spaced education to facilitate resident knowledge and guide program didactics. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:S23‐S26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gyorki DE, Shaw T, Nicholson J, et al. Improving the impact of didactic resident training with online spaced education. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:477‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hernick M. Test‐enhanced learning in an immunology and infectious disease medicinal chemistry/pharmacology course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Horn S, Hernick M. Improving student understanding of lipids concepts in a biochemistry course using test‐enhanced learning. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2015;16:918‐928. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kerfoot BP. Adaptive spaced education improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;183:678‐681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kerfoot BP. Learning benefits of on‐line spaced education persist for 2 years. J Urol. 2009;181:2671‐2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kerfoot BP. Interactive spaced education versus web based modules for teaching urology to medical students: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008;179:2351‐2356; discussion 2356‐2357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kerfoot BP, Armstrong EG, O'Sullivan PN. Interactive spaced‐education to teach the physical examination: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:973‐978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kerfoot BP, Baker H. An online spaced‐education game for global continuing medical education: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256:33‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Kerfoot BP, Baker H. An online spaced‐education game to teach and assess residents: a multi‐institutional prospective trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:367‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kerfoot BP, Baker H, Pangaro L, et al. An online spaced‐education game to teach and assess medical students: a multi‐institutional prospective trial. Acad Med. 2012;87:1443‐1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kerfoot BP, Baker HE, Koch MO, Connelly D, Joseph DB, Ritchey ML. Randomized, controlled trial of spaced education to urology residents in the United States and Canada. J Urol. 2007;177:1481‐1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kerfoot BP, Brotschi E. Online spaced education to teach urology to medical students: a multi‐institutional randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2009;197:89‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA, Church PA, Federman DD. Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2007;41:23‐31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kerfoot BP, Fu Y, Baker H, Connelly D, Ritchey ML, Genega EM. Online spaced education generates transfer and improves long‐term retention of diagnostic skills: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:331‐337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Kerfoot BP, Kearney MC, Connelly D, Ritchey ML. Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:744‐749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kerfoot BP, Lawler EV, Sokolovskaya G, Gagnon D, Conlin PR. Durable improvements in prostate cancer screening from online spaced education a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39:472‐478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kerfoot BP, Shaffer K, McMahon GT, et al. Online “spaced education progress‐testing” of students to confront two upcoming challenges to medical schools. Acad Med. 2011;86:300‐306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kerfoot BP, Turchin A, Breydo E, Gagnon D, Conlin PR. An online spaced‐education game among clinicians improves their patients’ time to blood pressure control: a randomized controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:468‐474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mathes EF, Frieden IJ, Cho CS, Boscardin CK. Randomized controlled trial of spaced education for pediatric residency education. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6:270‐274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Matos J, Petri CR, Mukamal KJ, Vanka A. Spaced education in medical residents: an electronic intervention to improve competency and retention of medical knowledge. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0181418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Matzie KA, Kerfoot BP, Hafler JP, Breen EM. Spaced education improves the feedback that surgical residents give to medical students: a randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2009;197:252‐257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Miller JO, Thammasitboon S, Hsu DC, Shah MI, Minard CG, Graf JM. Continuing medical education for air medical providers: the successes and challenges. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32:87‐92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Nakata BN, Cavalini W, Bonin EA, Salvalaggio PR, Loureiro MP. Impact of continuous training through distributed practice for acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4051‐4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Bauersachs A, et al. Spaced education activates students in a theoretical radiological science course: A pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ojha R, Liu A, Champion BL, Hibbert E, Nanan RK. Spaced scenario demonstrations improve knowledge and confidence in pediatric acute illness management. Front Pediatr. 2014;2:133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Patocka C, Khan F, Dubrovsky AS, Brody D, Bank I, Bhanji F. Pediatric resuscitation training‐instruction all at once or spaced over time? Resuscitation. 2015;88:6‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Raman M, McLaughlin K, Violato C, Rostom A, Allard JP, Coderre S. Teaching in small portions dispersed over time enhances long‐term knowledge retention. Med Teach. 2010;32:250‐255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shaikh U, Afsar‐Manesh N, Amin AN, Clay B, Ranji SR. Using an online quiz‐based reinforcement system to teach healthcare quality and patient safety and care transitions at the University of California. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29:735‐739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Shaw T, Long A, Chopra S, Kerfoot BP. Impact on clinical behavior of face‐to‐face continuing medical education blended with online spaced education: a randomized controlled trial. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31:103‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Shaw TJ, Pernar LI, Peyre SE, et al. Impact of online education on intern behaviour around joint commission national patient safety goals: a randomised trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:819‐825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Shenoi R, Rubalcava D, Naik‐Mathuria B, et al. Interactive spaced online education in pediatric trauma. Sage Open. 2016;6:215824401665316. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Smeds MR, Thrush CR, Mizell JS, Berry KS, Bentley FR. Mobile spaced education for surgery rotation improves National Board of Medical Examiners scores. J Surg Res. 2016;201:99‐104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Spruit EN, Band GP, Hamming JF. Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2235‐2243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Taveira‐Gomes T, Saffarzadeh A, Severo M, Guimaraes MJ, Ferreira MA. A novel collaborative e‐learning platform for medical students—ALERT STUDENT. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Bekkink MO, Donders R, van Muijen GNP, Ruiter DJ. Challenging medical students with an interim assessment: a positive effect on formal examination score in a randomized controlled study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;17:27‐37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Burdo J, O'Dwyer L. The effectiveness of concept mapping and retrieval practice as learning strategies in an undergraduate physiology course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39:335‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Dobson JL, Perez J, Linderholm T. Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:339‐347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Freda NM, Lipp MJ. Test‐enhanced learning in competence‐based predoctoral orthodontics: a four‐year study. J Dent Educ. 2016;80:348‐354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Galvagno SM Jr, Segal BS. Critical action procedures testing: a novel method for test‐enhanced learning. Med Educ. 2009;43:1182‐1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Jackson TH, Hannum WH, Koroluk L, Proffit WR. Effectiveness of web‐based teaching modules: test‐enhanced learning in dental education. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:775‐781. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Kerfoot BP, Kearney MC, Connelly D, Ritchey ML. Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249:744‐749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Lawson AL, Roediger HL 3rd. The importance of seeing the patient: test‐enhanced learning with standardized patients and written tests improves clinical application of knowledge. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013;18:409‐425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Terenyi J, Anksorus H, Persky AM. Impact of spacing of practice on learning brand name and generic drugs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82:6179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Andersen SA, Konge L, Caye‐Thomasen P, Sorensen MS. Retention of mastoidectomy skills after virtual reality simulation training. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142:635‐640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Andersen SA, Mikkelsen PT, Konge L, Caye‐Thomasen P, Sorensen MS. Cognitive load in distributed and massed practice in virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:E74‐E79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Dobson JL. Effect of uniform versus expanding retrieval practice on the recall of physiology information. Adv Physiol Educ. 2012;36:6‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Baghdady M, Carnahan H, Lam EW, Woods NN. Test‐enhanced learning and its effect on comprehension and diagnostic accuracy. Med Educ. 2014;48:181‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Spreckelsen C, Juenger J. Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: Results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Breckwoldt J, Ludwig JR, Plener J, Schroder T, Gruber H, Peters H. Differences in procedural knowledge after a “spaced” and a “massed” version of an intensive course in emergency medicine, investigating a very short spacing interval. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Bude L, Imbos T, van de Wiel MW, Berger MP. The effect of distributed practice on students’ conceptual understanding of statistics. High Educ. 2011;62:69‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Scales CD Jr, Moin T, Fink A, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of team‐based competition to increase learner participation in quality‐improvement education. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28:227‐232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Boettcher M, Boettcher J, Mietzsch S, Krebs T, Bergholz R, Reinshagen K. The spaced learning concept significantly improves training for laparoscopic suturing: a pilot randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:154‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Schoeff S, Hernandez B, Robinson DJ, Jameson MJ, Shonka DC Jr. Microvascular anastomosis simulation using a chicken thigh model: Interval versus massed training. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:2490‐2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Pashler H, Rohrer D, Cepeda NJ, Carpenter SK. Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: choices and consequences. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;14:187‐193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Barsoumian AE, Yun HC. Augmenting fellow education through spaced multiple‐choice questions. Mil Med. 2018;183:e122‐e126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Blazek MC, Dantz B, Wright MC, Fiedorowicz JG. Spaced learning using emails to integrate psychiatry into general medical curriculum: keep psychiatry in mind. Med Teach. 2016;38:1049‐1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Aung WY, Corboy JR, Friedman DI, Sperling MR. The effects of test‐enhanced learning on long‐term retention in AAN annual meeting courses. Neurology. 2015;84:748‐754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Pernar LI, Corso K, Lipsitz SR, Breen E. Using spaced education to teach interns about teaching skills. Am J Surg. 2013;206:120‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Phillips JL, Heneka N, Hickman L, Lam L, Shaw T. Can a complex online intervention improve cancer nurses’ pain screening and assessment practices? Results from a multicenter, pre‐post test pilot study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2017;18:75‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Phillips JL, Heneka N, Hickman L, Lam L, Shaw T. Impact of a novel online learning module on specialist palliative care nurses’ pain assessment competencies and patients’ reports of pain: Results from a quasi‐experimental pilot study. Palliat Med. 2014;28:521‐529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Robinson T, Janssen A, Kirk J, et al. New approaches to continuing medical education: a QStream (spaced education) program for research translation in ovarian cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32:476‐482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Tshibwabwa E, Mallin R, Fraser M, et al. An integrated interactive‐spaced education radiology curriculum for preclinical students. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2017;7:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Akdemir A, Zeybek B, Ergenoglu AM, Yeniel AO, Sendag F. Effect of spaced training with a box trainer on the acquisition and retention of basic laparoscopic skills. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127:309‐313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Andersen SA, Konge L, Caye‐Thomasen P, Sorensen MS. Learning curves of virtual mastoidectomy in distributed and massed practice. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141:913‐918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Bjerrum AS, Eika B, Charles P, Hilberg O. Distributed practice. The more the merrier? A randomised bronchoscopy simulation study. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):30517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Connor EV, Raker C, Wohlrab KJ. Effects of repetition and inactivity on laparoscopic skills training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:194‐197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ernst KD, Cline WL, Dannaway DC, et al. Weekly and consecutive day neonatal intubation training: comparable on a pediatrics clerkship. Acad Med. 2014;89:505‐510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Fann JI, Caffarelli AD, Georgette G, et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1486‐1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Mackay S, Morgan P, Datta V, Chang A, Darzi A. Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:957‐961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244:400‐409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Nesbitt JC, St Julien J, Absi TS, et al. Tissue‐based coronary surgery simulation: medical student deliberate practice can achieve equivalency to senior surgery residents. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1453‐1458; discussion 1458‐1459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Stransky D, Wilcox LM, Dubrowski A. Mental rotation: cross‐task training and generalization. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010;16:349‐360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Markley S, Sierra R, Scott DJ. Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:599‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Kesser BW, Hallman M, Murphy L, Tillar M, Keeley M, Peirce S. Interval vs massed training: how best do we teach surgery? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150:61‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Verdaasdonk E, Stassen L, Van Wijk R, Dankelman J. The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:214‐219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Mitchell EL, Lee DY, Sevdalis N, et al. Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill: a randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2011;201:31‐39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Kurosawa H, Ikeyama T, Achuff P, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of in situ pediatric advanced life support recertification (“pediatric advanced life support reconstructed”) compared with standard pediatric advanced life support recertification for ICU frontline providers. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:610‐618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Stefanidis D, Walters KC, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT. What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency‐based laparoscopic simulator training? Am J Surg. 2009;197:126‐129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Kleiman AM, Forkin KT, Bechtel AJ, et al. Generative retrieval improves learning and retention of cardiac anatomy using transesophageal echocardiography. Anest Analg. 2017;124:1440‐1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Moore FG, Chalk C. Improving the neurological exam skills of medical students. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39:83‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Murrihy RC, Byrne MK, Gonsalvez CJ. Testing an empirically derived mental health training model featuring small groups, distributed practice and patient discussion. Med Educ. 2009;43:140‐145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Rozenshtein A, Pearson GD, Yan SX, Liu AZ, Toy D. Effect of massed versus interleaved teaching method on performance of students in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:979‐984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Barrington MJ, Viero LP, Kluger R, Clarke AL, Ivanusic JJ, Wong DM. Determining the learning curve for acquiring core sonographic skills for ultrasound‐guided axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:667‐670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Ayyub A, Mahboob U. Effectiveness of Test‐Enhanced Learning (TEL) in lectures for undergraduate medical students. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33:1339‐1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Akkaraju S. The role of flipped learning in managing the cognitive load of a threshold concept in physiology. J Effect Teach. 2016;16:28‐43. [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Dobson JL. Retrieval practice is an efficient method of enhancing the retention of anatomy and physiology information. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:184‐191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. LaBossiere MD, Dell KA, Sunjic K, Wantuch GA. Student perceptions of group examinations as a method of exam review in pharmacotherapeutics. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2016;8:375‐379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL 3rd. Comparative effects of test‐enhanced learning and self‐explanation on long‐term retention. Med Educ. 2013;47:674‐682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Halliday N, O'Donoghue D, Klump KE, Thompson B. Human structure in six and one‐half weeks: one approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:149‐157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Marcotte DB, Geyer PR, Kilpatrick DG. The effect of a spaced sex education course on medical students’ sexual knowledge and attitudes. Med Educ. 1976;10:117‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Pernar LI, Beleniski F, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Hafler J, Breen E. Spaced education faculty development may not improve faculty teaching performance ratings in a surgery department. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:52‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Raupach T, Andresen JC, Meyer K, et al. Test‐enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: a crossover randomised trial. Med Educ. 2016;50:711‐720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Taveira‐Gomes T, Prado‐Costa R, Severo M, Ferreira MA. Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e‐learning system. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Kerdijk W, Cohen‐Schotanus J, Mulder BF, Muntinghe FLH, Tio RA. Cumulative versus end‐of‐course assessment: effects on self‐study time and test performance. Med Educ. 2015;49:709‐716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Kerdijk W, Tio RA, Mulder BF, Cohen‐Schotanus J. Cumulative assessment: strategic choices to influence students’ study effort. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. LaDisa AG, Biesboer A. Incorporation of practice testing to improve knowledge acquisition in a pharmacotherapy course. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9:660‐665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Ebbinghaus H. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University; 1885/1913. [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed New York, NY: Simon & Shuster Inc; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43:312‐319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Laksov KB, Dornan T, Teunissen PW. Making theory explicit—an analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Young M, Thomas A, Lubarsky S, et al. Drawing boundaries: the difficulty in defining clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 2018;93:990‐995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Shea JA, Arnold L, Mann KV. A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Acad Med. 2004;79:931‐938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Smolen P, Zhang Y, Byrne JH. The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Weidman J, Baker K. The cognitive science of learning: concepts and strategies for the educator and learner. Anest Analg. 2015;121:1586‐1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Weinstein Y, Madan CR, Sumeracki MA. Teaching the science of learning. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Antonoff MB, D'Cunha J. Retrieval practice as a means of primary learning: socrates had the right idea. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;23:89‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Keene AB, Shiloh AL, Dudaie R, Eisen LA, Savel RH. Online testing from Google Docs to enhance teaching of core topics in critical care: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2012;34:1075‐1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Rapp EJ, Maximin S, Green DE. Practice corner: retrieval practice makes perfect. Radiographics. 2014;34:1869‐1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Andersen SA. Virtual reality simulation training of mastoidectomy—studies on novice performance. Dan Med J. 2016;63:B5277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Lin Y, Cheng A. The role of simulation in teaching pediatric resuscitation: current perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:239‐248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Schaverien MV. Development of expertise in surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2010;67:37‐43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Sinitsky DM, Fernando B, Berlingieri P. Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in the virtual reality environment. Am J Surg. 2012;204:367‐376.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Evans DJ, Zeun P, Stanier RA. Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey. J Anat. 2014;224:296‐303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Katz LM, Finch A, McKinnish T, Gilliland K, Tolleson‐Rinehart S, Marks BL. Teaching procedural skills to medical students: a pilot procedural skills lab. Educ Health. 2017;30:79‐83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Brown D. An evidence‐based analysis of learning practices: the need for pharmacy students to employ more effective study strategies. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9:163‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Cannon‐Bowers JA, Bowers C, Procci K. Optimizing learning in surgical simulations: guidelines from the science of learning and human performance. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Kerfoot BP, Armstrong EG, O'Sullivan PN. Impact of item clustering on interactive spaced education. Med Educ. 2008;42:1115‐1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Stahl SM, Davis RL, Kim DH, et al. Play it gain: the master psychopharmacology program as an example of interval learning in bite‐sized portions. CNS Spectr. 2010;15:491‐504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student‐directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:308‐313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Panzarasa P, Kujawski B, Hammond EJ, Roberts CM. Temporal patterns and dynamics of e‐learning usage in medical education. Educ Tech Res Dev. 2016;64:13‐35. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 


Articles from Medical Education are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES