Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 26;23(2):171–181. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-01020-3

Table 3.

Univariate logistic regression analyses for TV responder status

Number of patients Odds ratio [95% CI] p-Value
Baseline
 Age (per 10-year higher age) 89 1.17 [0.82; 1.66] 0.380
 Sex (women vs men) 89 1.32 [0.56; 3.12] 0.531
 BMI (≥ 25 vs 20–25 kg/m2) 89 0.68 [0.26; 1.73] 0.413
 GH (per 1-μg/L lower level) 89 0.98 [0.95; 1.01] 0.116
 IGF-1 (per 50% ULN lower level) 89 1.02 [0.86; 1.22] 0.794
 TV (per 100-mm3 smaller size) 89 1.00 [0.99; 1.01] 0.976
Week 12
 GH (per 1-μg/L lower level) 85 1.12 [1.01; 1.25] 0.039
 IGF-1 (per 50% lower level ULN) 85 1.48 [1.13; 1.94] 0.004
 TV (per 100-mm3 smaller size) 85 1.00 [0.99; 1.02] 0.491
Change-from-baseline to week 12
 GH (per 10% increase) 85 0.78 [0.67; 0.90] < 0.001
 IGF-1 (per 10% increase) 85 0.73 [0.62; 0.87] < 0.001
 TV (per 10% reduction) 85 7.15 [3.15; 16.20] < 0.001

BMI body mass index, GH growth hormone, IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1, TV tumor volume, ULN upper limit of normal

Factors in bold are statistically significant. Data are based on the number of patients with available data for each factor at each timepoint, and with p-values from Chi squared tests. TV responder status was defined as ≥ 20% reduction in TV from baseline to last post-baseline value available