Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0230380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230380

α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and basal keratinocyte polarity

Johannes Altstätter 1, Michael W Hess 2, Mercedes Costell 3, Eloi Montanez 4,*
Editor: Erik H J Danen5
PMCID: PMC7067437  PMID: 32163511

Abstract

Epidermal morphogenesis and hair follicle (HF) development depend on the ability of keratinocytes to adhere to the basement membrane (BM) and migrate along the extracellular matrix. Integrins are cell-matrix receptors that control keratinocyte adhesion and migration, and are recognized as major regulators of epidermal homeostasis. How integrins regulate the behavior of keratinocytes during epidermal morphogenesis remains insufficiently understood. Here, we show that α-parvin (α-pv), a focal adhesion protein that couples integrins to actin cytoskeleton, is indispensable for epidermal morphogenesis and HF development. Inactivation of the murine α-pv gene in basal keratinocytes results in keratinocyte-BM detachment, epidermal thickening, ectopic keratinocyte proliferation and altered actin cytoskeleton polarization. In vitro, α-pv-null keratinocytes display reduced adhesion to BM matrix components, aberrant spreading and stress fibers formation, and impaired directed migration. Together, our data demonstrate that α-pv controls epidermal homeostasis by facilitating integrin-mediated adhesion and actin cytoskeleton organization in keratinocytes.

Introduction

The epidermis of vertebrates is a stratified squamous epithelium, consisting of multiple layers of keratinocytes that are separated from the underlying dermis by the basement membrane (BM), a specialized extracellular matrix (ECM) rich in laminins and collagens [1]. The epidermis is continuously regenerated throughout the life of the organism, and its homeostasis is achieved through a balance between the proliferation of keratinocytes in the basal cell layer and the loss of differentiated cells from the external surface of the skin [2]. Once basal keratinocytes commit to a terminal differentiation program, they exit the cell cycle, detach from the BM and migrate upwards through the suprabasal layers. This cell transition is accompanied by the successive differentiation of basal keratinocytes into terminally differentiated corneocytes, which will eventually be shaded from the outer layer as dead squames [2]. Loss of basal keratinocytes is replenished by stem cells that reside in the basal layer of the epidermis, in the sebaceous glands and in the bulge of hair follicles (HFs) [3]. HFs and sebaceous glands are epidermal appendages that form the pilosebaceous unit, whose main function is the production of the hair shaft, which is enveloped by the inner-root-sheath (IRS) and the outer-root-sheath (ORS) of the HF [4]. In mice, HF morphogenesis is initiated during embryogenesis and is completed by postnatal day 14. Thereafter, HFs cycle between phases of apoptosis-dependent regression (catagen), quiescence (telogen), and growth (anagen) [4]. During HF growth, bulge-derived keratinocytes of the ORS migrate along the BM towards the distal HF bulb, where they come in close proximity with the dermal papilla, a specialized mesenchymal compartment enclosed by the hair bulb. In the hair bulb, ORS keratinocytes differentiate into highly proliferative hair matrix (HM) keratinocytes.

Integrin-mediated adhesion to ECM and signaling are essential for epidermal morphogenesis, HF development and cycling, and keratinocyte function. Basal keratinocytes mainly attach to the underling BM via α6β4 and α3β1 integrins [5]. The binding of BM with α3β1 results in the assembly of focal adhesions (FAs), whereas its binding to α6β4 results in the formation of hemidesmosomes [5]. In the skin, integrins regulate the formation and assembly of BM, as well as the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes [6–8]. The molecular mechanisms that contribute to these integrin-mediated processes are, however, only partially understood.

Parvins are a family of adaptor proteins that localize to FAs and facilitate the interaction of integrins with the actin cytoskeleton [9]. Parvins also interact with integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which binds to PINCH to form a ternary complex (IPP-complex) that is directly recruited to β1 and β3 integrin cytoplasmic domains, where it regulates integrin signaling [10]. α-parvin (α-pv) is expressed ubiquitously and is an essential regulator of actin-dependent processes, such as cell spreading and migration [11]. Constitutive deletion of α-pv gene in mice leads to embryonic lethality at midgestation associated to multiple cardiovascular defects [11]. Endothelial α-pv regulates cell-cell junction organization, apical-basal polarity and the assembly of the BM around blood vessels [12, 13]. The function of α-pv in basal keratinocytes in vivo and during epidermal morphogenesis has not been studied until now.

In the current study, we use keratinocyte-specific approaches to show that the murine α-pv gene is indispensable for epidermis and HF morphogenesis. Epidermal defects in α-pv deficient skin include epidermis-BM detachment, ectopic keratinocyte proliferation, impaired basal keratinocyte polarization, and delayed keratinocyte differentiation. Together, we conclude that α-pv is required for integrin-regulated processes in keratinocytes during epidermal and HF morphogenesis.

Materials and methods

Mutant mice

To delete α-pv in keratinocytes, K5-Cre transgenic mice [14] were bred into a background of α-pvfloxed/floxed (α-pvfl/fl) mice [12]. All experiments with mice were performed in accordance to German guidelines and regulations, and protocols were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Max Planck Society.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Histology and immunohistochemistry of skin sections was performed as previously described [15].

Paraffin sections

Back-skin was fixed for 24 hours at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and embedded in paraffin. Individual 10-μm sections were mounted on adhesive glass slides coated with Poly-l-Lysine, dewaxed in xylene, and rehydrated in descending graded ethanol. Then, paraffin sections were incubated in blocking buffer (0.1% Triton X-100 and 3% BSA in PBS) for 1 hour at RT, followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing 3× with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 minutes, secondary antibodies were applied for 1 hour at room temperature (RT). After washing 3× with PBS for 15 minutes, sections were embedded in Fluoromount.

Frozen sections

Unfixed back-skin was embedded in OCT (Shandon Cryomatrix, Thermo) and rapidly frozen. Individual 12-μm sections were mounted on glass slides. Then, cryosections were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, methanol or Zn-fixative (40 mM ZnCl2, 3 mM calcium acetate monohydrate, 10 mM zinc trifluoroacetate hydrate, 100 mM Tris pH 6.8). Then, cryosections were incubated in blocking buffer for 1 hour at RT, followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing 3× with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 minutes, secondary antibodies were applied for 1 hour at RT. After washing 3× with PBS for 15 minutes, sections were embedded in Fluoromount.

The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-alpha-parvin (Dr. Reinhard Fässler [16]); mouse anti-paxillin (BD Biosciences); rat anti-E-cadherin (Zymed); rabbit anti-β-catenin (Sigma-Aldrich); rat anti-β4-integrin, FITC conjugated rat anti α6-integrin (PharMingen), Biotin-conjugated rat anti Mac-1 (PharMingen), PE-conjugated rat anti-Gr1 (PharMingen), rat anti-β1 integrin (Chemicon); rabbit antibody against LN332 (Dr. Monique Aumailley); rat anti-Ki67 (Dako); biotin-conjugated rabbit anti-phospho-Histone H3 (Upstate); rabbit anti-keratin 5 (Covance), rabbit anti-keratin 10 (Covance) and rabbit anti-loricrin (Covance). For secondary detection, species-specific Alexa Fluor-coupled secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) were used.

Epidermal whole mounts

Whole mounts from tail-skin were prepared as previously described [15]. Small pieces of tail-skin were incubated in 5 mM EDTA in PBS at 37°C for four hours. Subsequently, the epidermis was carefully peeled from the dermis and fixed in Zn-fixative at 4°C overnight.

Electron microscopy

Samples from back-skin were processed as described [17] by using immersion fixation with glutaraldehyde followed by OsO4, and epoxy resin embedding.

Isolation and culture of primary keratinocytes

Primary keratinocytes were isolated and cultured as previously described [15]. Keratinocyte growth medium was prepared from MEM medium (Sigma-Aldrich), complemented with 8% FCS, 45 μM CaCl2, 5 mg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 ng/ml EGF (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mg/ml transferrin (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM phosphorylethanolamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM ethanolamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.36 mg/ml hydrocortisone (Calbiochem), 2 mM L-Glutamine (Invitrogen) and 1x Penicillin/Streptomycin (PAA). Keratinocytes were cultured on tissue-culture dishes coated with 10 μg/ml collagen-I (INAMED) and 10 μg/ml fibronectin (Merck). For immunostaining, cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X100 and incubated with blocking solution of 1 hour at RT.

Adhesion assay

Primary keratinocytes (1x105 cells/well) were plated onto 96-well plates coated with poly-Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich), collagen-I (INAMED), fibronectin (Merck) or Laminin 332 (Dr. Monique Aumailley, University of Cologne, Germany). After 30 minutes incubation, non-adherent cells were removed through washing with PBS. The remaining adherent cells were lysed in substrate buffer (7.5 mM NPAG (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 M Na citrate pH 5, 0.5% Triton X-100) overnight at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 mM Glycine pH 10.4, 5 mM EDTA, and the O.D. 405 was measured.

In vitro wound healing assay

After 4 hours incubation in keratinocyte growth medium supplemented with 4 μg/ml Mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich), keratinocyte monolayers were gently scratched with the tip of a cell-scraper. Subsequently, images were captured every 10 min. for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 using a Zeiss Axiovert microscope. At least three independent experiments were performed and more than 20 individual cells were tracked for each experiment.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed T-test. Values are presented as mean plus standard error of the mean. P-values lower than 0.05 (*), 0.01 (**) or 0.001 (***) were regarded as significant.

Results

Keratinocyte restricted deletion of α-pv leads to progressive hair loss

To gain insight into the functions of α-pv in keratinocytes and during epidermal morphogenesis, we intercrossed mice carrying loxP-flanked α-pv gene (α-pvfl/fl) [12] with mice expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of K5 promoter (K5-Cre) [14]. Intercrosses between α-pvfl/+;K5-Cre males and α-pvfl/fl females yielded viable α-pvfl/fl;K5-Cre (referred to herein as α-pvΔK) mice at expected Mendelian ratio. Immunofluorescence analysis in skin samples from 2-week-old control (α-pvfl/+;K5-Cre and α-pvfl/+) mice showed strong expression of α-pv in basal keratinocytes of interfollicular epidermis and ORS of the HFs (Fig 1A). Immunofluorescence analysis of skin samples from α-pvΔK mice showed a strong reduction in the α-pv signal when compared to control mice (Fig 1A). Western blot analysis of lysates from freshly isolated keratinocyte from 1-week-old α-pvΔKC mice showed downregulation of α-pv expression when compared with lysates from controls mice (Fig 1B). No β-pv expression was detected in keratinocyte lysates (Fig 1B).

Fig 1. Keratinocyte-restricted deletion of α-pv results in progressive and persistent hair loss.

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Tail-skin of 8-week-old (would-mount) and back-skin of 2-week-old (paraffin section) control and α-pvΔK mice stained for α-pv and α6 integrin. Scale bars are 40 μm and 20 μm, respectively. E: epidermis, D: dermis, ORS: outer-root-sheath and SG: sebaceous gland. Note the expression of α-pv in basal keratinocytes of interfollicular epidermis and ORS, and the strong reduction in the α-pv signal in α-pvΔK mice when compared to control mice. (B) Protein levels of α-pv and β-pv in keratinocyte lysates of control and α-pvΔK mice and in fibroblast (fibro) lysates isolated from α-pv-/- mice [11]. (C) Gross morphology analysis of control and α-pvΔK mice at indicated time points.

At birth, α-pvΔK mice were indistinguishable from control littermates. At 1 week of age, in contrast to control mice, α-pvΔK mice displayed an irregular skin pigmentation with a patchy hair coat (Fig 1C). At 2 weeks of age, while control mice have developed a homogeneous hair coat, α-pvΔK mice displayed sparse hair with partial alopecia that persisted for about 4 weeks (Fig 1C). Thereafter, α-pvΔK mice gradually lost their hair, resulting in complete and persistent alopecia at around 8 weeks of age (Fig 1B). Together, these data showed that deletion of α-pv in basal keratinocytes results in irregular skin pigmentation, gradual hair loss and persistent alopecia.

Loss of α-pv triggers epidermal thickening and detachment, and impairs HF development

Histological analysis of back skin sections from 3-day-old control and α-pvΔK mice did not reveal any significant defects in α-pvΔK mice (S1 Fig). At later stages, α-pvΔK mice displayed progressive epidermal thickening and locally confined epidermal detachments at the dermal-epidermal junction (Fig 2A and 2B). The analysis also revealed that HF development was severely impaired in α-pvΔK mice (Fig 2A, 2C and 2D). At 2 weeks of age, HFs in control mice had an average length of 1100 μm and reached the subcutaneous fat layer (Fig 2A). In contrast, HFs in α-pvΔK mice had an average length of 270 μm and only 32% of them reached the subcutaneous compartment (Fig 2A and 2C). In addition, HF of α-pvΔK mice often appeared disorganized in structure, with distorted or absent hair shaft and dermal papilla, and enlarged sebaceous glands (Fig 2A). At 3 weeks of age, HFs of control and α-pvΔK mice were in the telogen phase, indicating that HF regression was not impaired in the absence of α-pv. However, while HF of control mice elongated during the following anagen phase and reached the subcutaneous compartment at 4 weeks, HFs of α-pvΔK mice did not undergo transition into the anagen phase and remained confined into the dermis (Fig 2A and 2B). Accumulations of melanin, which were most likely remnants of disintegrated HFs, were frequently detected in the dermis and subcutis of 8-week-old α-pvΔK mice (arrowheads in Fig 2A). Together, these results indicate that α-pv is critical for epidermal homeostasis and HF development.

Fig 2. Keratinocyte-restricted deletion of α-pv results in epidermis thickening and subepidermal blistering and impaired HF development.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

(A-C) Hematoxylin-eosin staining of back skin section of control and α-pvΔK mice. Black arrows indicate areas of epidermal detachments at the DEJ, white arrow indicate subepidermal blister filled with repair tissue, white arrowheads indicate abnormal melanin-deposits. Triangle: fully developed HFs, square: short and prematurely growth arrested HFs and asterisk: epidermis hyperthickening. E: epidermis; D: dermis; SC: subcutis; PC: panniculus carnosum. Scale bar: 200 μm. (D) Histogram of HF length distributions at distinct stages of the HF cycle. At least 3 mice per genotype and time point were analyzed, and a minimum of 100 HFs per time point are presented in the histograms. Images were processed with the Image-J software.

Mice lacking α-pv show abnormal epidermal proliferation

To determine whether epidermal and ORS thickening observed in α-pvΔK mice were due to increased cell proliferation, we immunostained skin sections of 2-week-old control and α-pvΔK mice with antibodies against Ki67 and phospho-Histone-3, two cell proliferation markers. In control mice, proliferating keratinocytes were exclusively observed at the basal layer of the epidermis and around the dermal papilla in the HF (Fig 3A and 3B). In contrast, in the epidermis of α-pvΔK mice, about 30% of proliferating keratinocytes were observed in suprabasal layers (Fig 3). The analysis also showed that the percentage of proliferating cells in the basal layer was not altered in α-pvΔK mice compared to control mice (Fig 3A and 3B). Moreover, in HFs of α-pvΔK mice, proliferative cells accumulated in the ORS and were partially absent from the hair bulb (Fig 3A). These data indicated that epidermal and ORS hyperthickening in α-pvΔK mice is due, at least in part, to ectopic proliferation of keratinocytes in suprabasal layers.

Fig 3. Deletion of α-pv results in the accumulation of ectopically proliferating cells in suprabasal layers of the epidermis and in the ORS.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Ki67 staining of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Arrowheads indicate proliferating suprabasal cells and arrow point to proliferative cells in the ORS of α-pv-null HFs. Asterisks indicate a region in the α-pvΔK HF-bulb devoid of proliferative cells. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Double-fluorescent labeling for phospho-histone 3 and α6-integrin of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Arrowheads indicate proliferating suprabasal cells. Scale bar: 20 μm. E: epidermis, D: dermis and HF: hair follicles (C) Quantification of Ki67-positive cells in basal and suprabasal layers of control and α-pvΔK epidermis. Values represent means+SD.

Defects in integrin localization and BM organization in α-pvΔK mice

Integrin α6β4 is a central component of hemidesmosomes, specialized adhesion complexes that contribute to the binding of basal keratinocytes to the underlying BM and thus to the stable adhesion of the epidermis to the dermis [5]. The presence of subepidermal microblisters in α-pvΔK mice led us to analyze integrin localization in control and α-pvΔK mice. Co-immunostaining of skin sections from control mice for β4 integrin and the BM component laminin 332 (LN332) showed a thin and continuous BM, and a linear β4 integrin stain focally concentrated at the BM surface of the basal keratinocytes (Fig 4A; S2 Fig). In marked contrast, skin of α-pvΔK mice showed extensive areas with a discontinuous and disordered BM (Fig 4A; S2 Fig). Depletion of α-pv also severely altered the distribution of β4 integrin, which exhibited a discontinuous pattern and was undetectable in many of the regions with disordered BM (Fig 4A; S2 Fig). Moreover, while in control epidermis β1 integrin expression was restricted to basal keratinocytes, in the epidermis of α-pvΔK mice β1 integrin expressing cells were also found in suprabasal layers (Fig 4B; S2 Fig).

Fig 4. Impaired integrin distribution and distorted BM organization in the skin of α-pvΔK mice.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

Double-fluorescent labeling for (A) LN332 and β4-integrin, and (B) LN332 and β1-integrin of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Arrowhead indicates β1 integrin expressing suprabasal cells. Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Ultrastructure of the skin of control and α-pvΔK mice. α-pvΔK mice are characterized by displacement of the basement membrane into the collagen-fibrils of the dermis (cross) and the widening of intercellular spaces (red asterisks), associated with the occurrence of microvilli-like cell protrusions. Double black arrows: desmosomes, single black arrow: lamina densa, red arrows: desmosomes and black asterisks: dermis. (D) Double-fluorescent labeling for LN332 and Gr1, and LN332 and Mac-1 of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Arrows indicate Gr1-positive granulocytes and Mac1-positive macrophages in the dermis and adjacent to HFs in 2-week-old α-pvΔK mice. Scale bar: 20 μm. E: epidermis, D: dermis, HF: hair follicle and RT: repair tissue.

To examine whether loss of α-pv affects hemidesmosomes, we performed transmission electron microscopy analysis on back-skin sections from 2-week-old control and α-pvΔK mice. Skin of control mice displayed a distinct and continuous lamina densa immediately underneath basal keratinocytes, and numerous hemidesmosomes at the basal surface of basal keratinocytes (Fig 4C). In contrast, skin of α-pvΔK mice showed a disrupted BM and absence of hemidesmosomes in areas where basal keratinocytes had detached from the BM (Fig 4C). In addition, the analysis also revealed between the keratinocytes wider intercellular spaces with extensive interdigitating cell protrusions membrane in α-pvΔK mice compared to control mice (Fig 4C). Desmosomes were still present in α-pv-deficient epidermis, appeared morphologically normal, and mediated cell-cell contacts (Fig 4C). Taken together, these results indicate that loss of α-pv leads to hemidesmosome abnormalities and BM disruption.

Concomitant with the disruption of BM and the formation of epidermal blisters, granulocyte/macrophage infiltrates were observed in the skin of α-pvΔK mice in areas with discontinuous BM and around distorted HFs (Fig 4D). The absence of inflammatory signs in hyperplastic skin of 1-week-old α-pvΔK mice suggested that epidermal hyperplasia precedes inflammation rather than being a consequence of it (Fig 4D).

α-pv is required for F-actin polarization

Detailed morphological analysis revealed that in basal keratinocytes from control mice, F-actin was predominantly accumulated at E-cadherin/β-catenin-positive adherens junctions to form the characteristic apical F-actin belt (Fig 5A). In contrast, BM-attached keratinocytes in α-pvΔK mice showed in addition to the apical F-actin belt a prominent F-actin accumulation at their basal surfaces, indicating that loss of α-pv affects F-actin polarization (Fig 5A). Associated to impaired F-actin localization and in contrast to control cells, BM-attached α-pv-deficient basal keratinocytes displayed unpolarized E-cadherin/β-catenin stain (Fig 5B and 5C). Together, these data indicated that α-pv is necessary for F-actin polarization in keratinocytes.

Fig 5. Impaired keratinocyte polarity and differentiation in α-pvΔK mice.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

Double-fluorescent labeling for (A) F-actin and α6-integrin, (B) E-cadherin and LN332, and (C) β-catenin and LN332 of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Arrowheads indicate basal stain of F-actin, E-cadherin and β-catenin in α-pv-null basal keratinocytes. Scale bar: 10, 20 and 20 μm respectively. (D) Double-fluorescent labeling for keratin-5 and α6-integrin, keratin-10 and α6-integrin, and loricrin and α6-integrin of control and α-pv-null skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Dotted line: basement membrane. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Abnormal epidermal differentiation in α-pvΔK mice

Ectopic proliferation and expression of β1 and β4 integrins by suprabasal cells could be consequences of delayed differentiation and/or abnormal translocation of undifferentiated basal keratinocytes to suprabasal layers. To investigate the effects of α-pv deficiency on epidermal differentiation, we examined the expression and localization of keratin-5 (a basal cell marker), keratin-10 (an early epidermal differentiation maker) and loricrin (a late epidermal differentiation maker) by immunofluorescence in skin sections of 2-weeks-old control and α-pvΔK mice. While in control epidermis keratin-5 expression was restricted to the basal layer, in α-pv-deficient epidermis, keratin-5 expression was detected in basal keratinocytes as well as in suprabasal cells (Fig 5D; S3 Fig). Moreover, expression of keration-10, which is usually localized in the first suprabasal layer (spinous layer), was found in all suprabasal layers in α-pv-null epidermis (Fig 5D; S3 Fig). Finally, the expression of loricrin was no longer confined to the stratum granulosum but also present in nucleated cells below the stratum granulosum (Fig 5D; S3 Fig). Together these results suggested that deletion of α-pv impairs the terminal differentiation of keratinocyte.

Deletion of α-pv compromises adhesion, spreading and migration of keratinocytes

To determine whether the poor adhesion of keratinocytes to the BM observed in α-pvΔK mice was caused by the altered BM organization or by a defective integrin-mediated adhesion of the keratinocytes to the BM, we isolated keratinocytes from control and α-pvΔK mice and tested their ability to adhere and spread on defined BM components. The analysis revealed that control keratinocytes readily adhered to fibronectin (FN), collagen type-I (Col-I) and LN332, while α-pv-null keratinocytes showed strongly and significant reduced adhesion to these substrates (Fig 6A). Integrin-independent adhesion to poly-L-Lysine was not affected in α-pv-null keratinocytes (Fig 6A). Moreover, most of the adhered α-pv-null cells remained rounded and those that were able to spread developed multiple unpolarized lamellipodia protrusions and failed to display stress fibers (Fig 6B). Loss of α-pv also let to pronounced reduction in paxillin-containing FAs (Fig 6C). To determine whether the lack of α-pv affects migration of keratinocytes, we monitored the polarized rate of cell migration during recovery of scratches introduced into primary keratinocyte monolayers. While control keratinocytes healed the wound within 24 hours, α-pv-null keratinocytes failed to efficiently migrate into the wound (Fig 6D). Single-cell tracking revealed two reasons for the impaired wound healing. First, while control keratinocytes migrated with an average speed of 0.56 ± 0.19 μm/min, α-pv-null keratinocytes were significantly slower and moved with an average speed of 0.34 ± 0.16 μm/min. Consequently, the accumulated distance migrated by α-pv-null cells (481.92 ± 227.85 μm) was significantly shorter than that of control cells (808.52 ± 275.12 μm). Second, α-pv-null keratinocytes were impaired in their directionality. The directionality index determined for control keratinocytes was 0.34 ± 0.14, whereas it was only 0.14 ± 0.09 for α-pv-null keratinocytes. Both defects together resulted in a significantly reduced euclidean migration distance of α-pv-null cells (62.59 ± 40.76 μm) compared to control (262.23 ± 107.13 μm) cells (Fig 6D and 6E).

Fig 6. Adhesion and migration of α-pv-deficient keratinocytes.

Fig 6

Open in a new tab

(A) Quantification of adhesion of control and α-pv-null keratinocytes to PLL, LN332, FN and Col-I. Values represent means of the percentage of adhering cells + SD. At least three independent adhesion assays were performed. (B) Double-fluorescent labeling for α-pv and F-actin of control and α-pv-null keratinocytes cultured on fibronectin. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. (C) Double-fluorescent labeling for α-pv and paxillin of control and α-pv-null keratinocytes cultured on fibronectin. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. (D) Scratch wounding of a confluent monolayer of control and α-pv-null keratinocytes. (E) Quantification of migration parameters as indicated. Values represent means+SD. At least three independent scratch assay experiments were performed and more than 20 individual cells were tracked in randomly chosen regions in each experiment.

Discussion

Here, we show that α-pv is critical for epidermal and HF morphogenesis. Deletion of the α-pv gene in keratinocytes in mice has three main consequences: 1) keratinocyte-BM detachment resulting in subepidermal blisters and distorted BM organization, 2) impaired HF development and maintenance causing progressive and persistent alopecia, and 3) impaired epidermal differentiation manifested as epidermal hyperproliferation and thickening, and abnormal expression of epidermal differentiation makers.

Adhesion of basal keratinocytes to the BM is mainly mediated by α6β4 and α3β1 integrins, which bind to LN-332, the main matrix component of the BM [5, 8]. Keratinocytes also express low levels of α2β1 and α5β1 integrins, which together with α3β1 are required for establish and maintain the integrity of the BM [6, 8, 18]. The interaction of LN-332 with β1 integrins results in the assembly of FAs, whereas its binding to α6β4 integrin results in the formation of hemidesmosomes [5]. The parvin-containing IPP complex associates with β1 and β3 integrins, and thereby couples extracellular signals to a variety of intracellular processes such as signal transduction and cytoskeletal dynamics [9, 12, 13]. Here we show that α-pvΔK mice displayed epidermal detachment and deterioration of BM integrity, indicating that α-pv regulates α3β1 integrin signaling in vivo. These results are in line with previous data showing that ILK and PINCH, the other members of the IPP-complex, are also key regulators of α3β1 integrin function during epidermal morphogenesis [19–21]. Although the IPP complex does not interact with β4 integrins, epidermal detachment in α-pvΔK mice was associated to the dissociation of hemidesmosomes, suggesting that α-pv affects hemidesmosome stability indirectly. One possibility could be that BM defects caused by the absence of α-pv compromise hemidesmosome stability [22]. In addition, although α6β4 is the only integrin found in hemidesmosomes, other integrins can indirectly contribute to their assembly [8]. It has been shown that α3β1 integrin is involved in the assembly of hemidesmosomes in vitro [18, 22]. However, although BM integrity is severely compromised in α3-deficient mice, hemidesmosomes are intact and unaffected in these mice [23]. In contrast, conditional deletion of β1 integrins in keratinocytes results in significant reduction of hemidesmosomes, indicating that β1 integrins are necessary for the stability of the hemidesmosomes in vivo, and that α2β1 and α5β1 integrins can partially compensate the loss of α3β1 integrin in the epidermis [6, 8]. Together, these observations indicate that: 1) BM defects are not the primary cause of hemidesmosome abnormalities in α-pvΔK mice, 2) α-pv not only regulates α3β1 integrin signaling, but also that of α2β1 and α5β1 integrins, and 3) α-pv is required to facilitate β1 integrin-dependent hemidesmosome stability. A requirement of α-pv for β1 integrin signaling was also evident in α-pv-deficient keratinocytes, which showed reduced adhesion to Col-I, FN and LN-332, diminished cell spreading, delayed formation of stress fibers and FAs, and impaired directed migration. Further experiments are now needed to understand how α-pv regulates the interplay between β1 integrins and α6β4 integrin during the assembly/disassembly of hemidesmosomes.

Epithelial cell polarity is characterized by the asymmetrical distribution of F-actin and cell junction proteins, such as E-cadherin and β-catenin [2]. In basal keratinocytes, F-actin localizes predominantly along cell-cell borders where it associates with E-cadherin/β-catenin complexes and stabilizes the adherens junctions [2]. Our results show that in α-pv-null basal keratinocytes F-actin was mainly distributed along the basal membrane, and localization of E-cadherin and β-catenin was no longer restricted to cell-cell borders, being also present at basal side. These defects were accompanied by the destabilization of the adherens junctions and the widening of the intercellular spaces. Interestingly, desmosomal structures were maintained in α-pvΔK mice. Together, these results indicate that α-pv controls cell polarity of basal keratinocytes and that it is necessary to maintain the adhesive properties of adherens junctions. In line with this, it has been recently shown that α-pv also regulates cell-cell junction integrity and cell polarity in endothelial cells, a specialized type of epithelial cells [12, 13].

Loss of α-pv compromises HF morphogenesis and results in progressive loss of hair. While 35% of the HFs in α-pvΔK mice completed their morphogenesis during the first 2 weeks after birth, the remaining 65% were severely distorted and prematurely growth-arrested. Asynchronous initiation and morphogenesis of distinct types of HFs together with the perinatal loss of α-pv can explain the development of both prematurely growth arrested and mature HFs in α-pvΔK mice [24]. Although catagen and telogen appeared to proceed normal in HFs of α-pvΔK mice, all HFs failed outgrowth during the following anagen phase. HF growth depends on proliferation and directional migration of stem cell-derived keratinocytes from the HF bulge region towards the HF bulb, where they differentiate into hair matrix keratinocytes. Directed migration is impaired in α-pv-deficient keratinocytes, suggesting that these migration defects account for the accumulation of proliferative keratinocytes in the ORS of mature α-pv-deficient HFs, the impaired development of prematurely growth arrested α-pv-deficient HFs and the impaired HF outgrowth during anagen in the absence of α-pv.

During the course of terminal differentiation, keratinocytes undergo a series of changes in gene expression. Basal keratinocytes express keratin-5, keratin-14 and α6β4 integrin. As they detach from BM and migrate up to the spinous layer, the expression of these specific basal markers is stopped and the expression of keratin-1 and keratin-10 is activated. Finally, cells from the granular layer are filled with histidine- and cysteine-rich proteins, such as loricrin. In α-pv-deficient epidermis, cells in the suprabasal layers continued to express basal keratinocyte markers, including keratin-5 and α6β4 integrin. Moreover, nucleated cells below the granular layer expressed loricrin. This indicates that α-pv is necessary for the correct differentiation of keratinocytes. The α-pvΔK mice also displayed ectopic proliferation in suprabasal layers of the epidermis and inflammation. Inactivation of ILK or PINCH in keratinocytes in mice leads to epidermal defects resembling those in α-pvΔK mice [19–21], indicating that epidermal morphogenesis requires α-pv, ILK and PINCH-1, and therefore presumably also the formation of the IPP complex.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Histological analysis of back skin sections from 3-day-old control and α-pvΔK mice.

Hematoxylin-eosin staining of back skin section of 3-days-old control and α-pvΔK mice did not reveal any significant differences between control and α-pvΔK mice. E: epidermis; D: dermis; SC: subcutis; PC: panniculus carnosum. Scale bar: 200 μm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, tif)
S2 Fig. Impaired integrin distribution and distorted BM organization in the skin of α-pvΔK mice (overview images of Fig 4).

Double-fluorescent labeling for (A) LN332 and β4-integrin, and (B) LN332 and β1-integrin of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Double-fluorescent labeling for LN332 and Gr1, and LN332 and Mac-1 of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. E: epidermis, D: dermis, HF: hair follicle and RT: repair tissue.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (5.1MB, tif)
S3 Fig. Impaired keratinocyte differentiation in α-pvΔK mice (overview images of Fig 5D).

Double-fluorescent labeling for keratin-5 and α6-integrin, keratin-10 and α6-integrin, and loricrin and α6-integrin of control and α-pv-null skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, tif)
S1 Raw images

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file. (370.6KB, tif)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Reinhard Fässler and Dr. Monique Aumailley who kindly provided us with antibodies.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Max Planck Society and the DFG (MO-2562/1-2).

References

  • 1.Breitkreutz D, Koxholt I, Thiemann K, Nischt R. Skin basement membrane: the foundation of epidermal integrity-BM functions and diverse roles of bridging molecules nidogen and perlecan. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 10.1155/2013/179784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fuchs E, Raghavan S. Getting under the skin of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:199–209. 10.1038/nrg758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fuchs E. Skin stem cells: rising to the surface. J Cell Biol. 2008;180:273–284. 10.1083/jcb.200708185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paus R, Cotsarelis G. The biology of hair follicles. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:491–497. 10.1056/NEJM199908123410706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wickström SA, Radovanac K, Fässler R. Genetic analyses of integrin signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;1:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brakebusch C, Grose R, Quondamatteo F, Ramirez A, Jorcano JL, Pirro A et al. Skin and hair follicle integrity is crucially dependent on beta 1 integrin expression on keratinocytes. EMBO J. 2000;19:3990–4003. 10.1093/emboj/19.15.3990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grose R, Hutter C, Bloch W, Thorey I, Watt FM, Fässler R et al. A crucial role of beta 1 integrins for keratinocyte migration in vitro and during cutaneous wound repair. Development. 2002;129:2303–2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raghavan S, Bauer C, Mundschau G, Li Q, Fuchs. Conditional ablation of beta1 integrin in skin. Severe defects in epidermal proliferation, basement membrane formation, and hair follicle invagination. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:1149–1160. 10.1083/jcb.150.5.1149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Legate KR, Montanez E, Kudlacek O, Fässler R. ILK, PINCH and parvin: the tIPP of integrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:20–31. 10.1038/nrm1789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wickström SA, Lange A, Montanez E, Fässler R. The ILK/PINCH/parvin complex: the kinase is dead, long live the pseudokinase! EMBO J. 2010;2:281–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Montanez E, Wickstrom SA, Altstatter J, Chu H, Fässler. Alpha-parvin controls vascular mural cell recruitment to vessel wall by regulating RhoA/ROCK signalling. EMBO J. 2009;28:3132–3144. 10.1038/emboj.2009.295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fraccaroli A, Pitter B, Taha AA, Seebach J, Huveneers S, Kirsch J et al. Endothelial alpha-parvin controls integrity of developing vasculature and is required for maintenance of cell-cell junctions. Circ Res. 2015;1:29–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pitter B, Werner AC, Montanez E. Parvins Are Required for Endothelial Cell-Cell Junctions and Cell Polarity During Embryonic Blood Vessel Formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;5:1147–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramirez A, Page A, Gandarillas A, Zanet J, Pibre S, Vidal M et al. A keratin K5Cre transgenic line appropriate for tissue-specific or generalized Cre-mediated recombination. Genesis. 2004;39:52–57. 10.1002/gene.20025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Montanez E, Piwko-Czuchra A, Bauer M, Fässler R. Analysis of integrin functions in peri-implantation embryos, hematopoietic system, and skin. Methods Enzymol. 2007;426:239–289. 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)26012-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chu H, Thievessen I, Sixt M, Lämmermann T, Waisman A, Braun A et al. gamma-Parvin is dispensable for hematopoiesis, leukocyte trafficking, and T-cell-dependent antibody response. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:1817–25. 10.1128/MCB.26.5.1817-1825.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hess MW, Pfaller K, Ebner HL, Beer B, Hekl D, Seppi T. 3D versus 2D cell culture implications for electron microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 2010;96:649–670. 10.1016/S0091-679X(10)96027-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sterk LM, Geuijen CA, Oomen LC, Calafat J, Janssen H, Sonnenberg A. The tetraspan molecule CD151, a novel constituent of hemidesmosomes, associates with the integrin alpha6beta4 and may regulate the spatial organization of hemidesmosomes. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:969–982. 10.1083/jcb.149.4.969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lorenz K, Grashoff C, Torka R, Sakai T, Langbein L, Bloch W et al. Integrin-linked kinase is required for epidermal and hair follicle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2007;177:501–513. 10.1083/jcb.200608125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakrieko KA, Welch I, Dupuis H, Bryce D, Pajak A, Arnaud RS et al. Impaired hair follicle morphogenesis and polarized keratinocyte movement upon conditional inactivation of integrin-linked kinase in the epidermis. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:1462–1473. 10.1091/mbc.E07-06-0526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karaköse E, Geiger T, Flynn K, Lorenz-Baath K, Zent R, Mann M et al. The focal adhesion protein PINCH-1 associates with EPLIN at integrin adhesion sites. J Cell Sci. 2015;5:1023–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Litjens SH, de Pereda JM, Sonnenberg A. Current insights into the formation and breakdown of hemidesmosomes. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:376–383. 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.DiPersio CM, Hodivala-Dilke KM, Jaenisch R, Kreidberg JA, Hynes RO. alpha3beta1 Integrin is required for normal development of the epidermal basement membrane. J Cell Biol 1997;137:729–742. 10.1083/jcb.137.3.729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schmidt-Ullrich R, Paus R. Molecular principles of hair follicle induction and morphogenesis. Bioessays 2005;27:247–261 10.1002/bies.20184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Erik H J Danen

12 Feb 2020

PONE-D-20-01092

α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and basal keratinocyte polarity

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Montanez,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Your manuscript has been evaluated by two expert reviewers. Both reviewers find the manuscript novel and in general technically sound. There are some issues raised concerning microscopy images and data interpretation, that will have to be addressed to warrant publication. Lower magnification overview images should be included to facilitate interpretation of the high-magnification images, numbers should be provided for quantification/statistics of data, and conclusions drawn from the experiments in part require better support or may have to be adjusted (i.e. does inactivation of α-parvin really cause weakened keratinocyte-BM adhesion and rupture of the BM).

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Mar 28 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Erik H. J. Danen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"The authors have declared that no competing interests exist."

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: Roche Diagnostics GmbH.

  1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc. 

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is the first report of an epidermis-specific inactivation of α-parvin. The claim in the title that α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and keratinocyte polarity are justified based on the morphological images presented in the manuscript. In contrast, claims that inactivation of α-parvin results in weakened keratinocyte-BM adhesion and rupture of the BM are not supported by the data.

Major problems:

1. Most of the pictures are at high magnification. Consequently only a small portion of the section is shown while an overview at low magnification would allow a much better evaluation of skin defects. Observation at high magnification may have misled the authors. Indeed, there are blisters in Fig.2a, 2 weeks; and repair tissue filling the blister cavity in Fig.2a, 4 weeks, just below the asterisk; probably in Fig.2a, 8 weeks between the epidermis and the melanin deposits; and in Fig. 3b; in Fig. 4a, left photo of α-PVΔK between epidermis and the LN332-containing BM along the cavity floor; in Fig. 4b, photo of α-PVΔK between epidermis and the LN332-containing BM along the cavity floor (here the repair tissue is staining positive for beta 1 integrin as it is typical for repair tissue during wound healing); in Fig. 4d, the two pictures corresponding to α-PVΔK 2 weeks staining positive for LN332, Gr1 and Mac-1 (positive staining with Gr1 and Mac-1 is typical of the inflammatory activation during wound healing).

Several photos are centered on this repair tissue (b1 integrins, Mac-1, Gr1) and not on the epidermis as claimed by the authors.

2. Figure 1a,b aims to show parvin expression in skin. The origin of the rabbit antibody is not mentioned in Material and Methods. Very frequently rabbit antiserum contains antibodies against rabbit keratins. Staining of the paraffin section looks as a basal keratin staining, i.e. without polarization. The authors should show strictly parallel staining of control and KO skin side by side to be convincing. Where is parvin in the whole-mount? Are the keratinocytes used for the western blot cultivated or freshly isolated? And what about the fibro ? I guess it stands for fibroblasts which are not mentioned in the legend or in Material and Methods.

3. Figure 2 shows blisters at 2 weeks and not later. Is that correct? If yes what happen to the blisters at time point later than 2 weeks? Where are the blisters occurring? subepidermal or intraepidermal? and how much of the dermal-epidermal zone is affected. Overview should be provided. Explicit a, b and c separately in the legend. Details related to quantification of HFs are totally missing in the Legend or in Material and Methods (how many mice, how many sections per mice, which software, etc…).

4. Figure 3b, Figure 4a,b,d and Figure 5: For the same reasons as above, overview should be provided. As mentioned above, some pictures are centered to the repair tissue filling the blister cavity while others are centered on the epidermis outside the damaged areas where the dermal-epidermal junction appears to be intact. This is very confusing.

5. The blister level is not within the basement membrane plane since in Fig. 4 the electron micrographs of the knockout animals shown in c, there is a distinct basal lamina in area B. In addition for α-PVΔK skin, there is good positive staining of LN332 in the floor of the blister/filled blister cavity in Fig. 3b, Fig. 4a,b Fig. 4d5.

In conclusion, better illustrations should be provided and interpretation of the results needs a careful re-examination.

Reviewer #2: This is a nice manuscript describing the parvin knockout phenotype in skin. The analysis was interesting and well documented. The authors show that epidermal morphogenesis and hair follicle formation are critically dependent upon this key Integrin signalling component. I recommend publication.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 12;15(3):e0230380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230380.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0

20 Feb 2020

2. Review Comments to the Author

We would like to thank all reviewers for their time, effort and valuable suggestions, which are greatly appreciated and have enabled us to improve the manuscript further.

Reviewer #1: This is the first report of an epidermis-specific inactivation of α-parvin. The claim in the title that α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and keratinocyte polarity are justified based on the morphological images presented in the manuscript. In contrast, claims that inactivation of α-parvin results in weakened keratinocyte-BM adhesion and rupture of the BM are not supported by the data.

This is an important observation, thank you for the comment.

We have modified the abstract, the results and the discussion to avoid any misunderstandings.

The revised abstract now reads “Inactivation of the murine α-pv gene in basal keratinocytes results in keratinocyte-BM detachment, epidermal thickening, ectopic keratinocyte proliferation and altered actin cytoskeleton polarization” and the revised discussion that now reads “Deletion of the α-pv gene in keratinocytes in mice has three main consequences: 1) keratinocyte-BM detachment resulting in subepidermal blisters and distorted BM organization…”

Major problems:

1. Most of the pictures are at high magnification. Consequently only a small portion of the section is shown while an overview at low magnification would allow a much better evaluation of skin defects. Observation at high magnification may have misled the authors. Indeed, there are blisters in Fig.2a, 2 weeks; and repair tissue filling the blister cavity in Fig.2a, 4 weeks, just below the asterisk; probably in Fig.2a, 8 weeks between the epidermis and the melanin deposits; and in Fig. 3b; in Fig. 4a, left photo of α-PVΔK between epidermis and the LN332-containing BM along the cavity floor; in Fig. 4b, photo of α-PVΔK between epidermis and the LN332-containing BM along the cavity floor (here the repair tissue is staining positive for beta 1 integrin as it is typical for repair tissue during wound healing); in Fig. 4d, the two pictures corresponding to α-PVΔK 2 weeks staining positive for LN332, Gr1 and Mac-1 (positive staining with Gr1 and Mac-1 is typical of the inflammatory activation during wound healing).

Several photos are centered on this repair tissue (b1 integrins, Mac-1, Gr1) and not on the epidermis as claimed by the authors.

Thank you for this comment. The reviewer is correct and in many images it is possible to observe the blisters filled the repair tissue. To avoid any misunderstandings, we have depicted the repair tissue areas in the revised figure 2 and figure 4. Please also see point 3.

2. Figure 1a,b aims to show parvin expression in skin. The origin of the rabbit antibody is not mentioned in Material and Methods.

We apologize for this shortcoming. The anti-alpha-parvin rabbit antibody was provided by Dr. Reinhard Fässler. We now provide this information in the revised material and methods section. We have also incorporated a reference into the material and methods in the revised manuscript (ref.17)

Very frequently rabbit antiserum contains antibodies against rabbit keratins. Staining of the paraffin section looks as a basal keratin staining, i.e. without polarization. The authors should show strictly parallel staining of control and KO skin side by side to be convincing.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have performed immunostaining of skin samples from 2 weeks-old α-pvΔK mice with the anti-alpha-parvin antibody. The analysis revealed a strong reduction in the α-pv signal in α-pvΔK mice when compared to control mice. These results are displayed in revised figure 1A and mentioned in revised results sections.

Where is parvin in the whole-mount?

We apologize for not been clear in this point. As showed in figure 1A and mentioned in the results part, α-pv is expressed in basal keratinocytes of interfollicular epidermis and ORS of the HFs. To make this point clear, this is now also mentioned in the revised figure legend.

Are the keratinocytes used for the western blot cultivated or freshly isolated?

We apologize for this shortcoming. The keratinocytes used for the western blot were freshly isolated. This information is now mentioned in the revised results section.

And what about the fibro? I guess it stands for fibroblasts which are not mentioned in the legend or in Material and Methods.

The reviewer is correct, “fibro” stands for fibroblast. This information is mentioned in the revised figure legend.

3. Figure 2 shows blisters at 2 weeks and not later. Is that correct? If yes what happen to the blisters at time point later than 2 weeks? Where are the blisters occurring? subepidermal or intraepidermal? and how much of the dermal-epidermal zone is affected.

We apologize for not been clear in this point. The subepidermal microblisters are also seen at 4 and 8 weeks. In the original figure 2A, the microblisters at 8 weeks were marked with a black arrow. In the revised figure 2A, the microblisters filled with repair tissue at 4 weeks are pointed with a arrow.

Overview should be provided. Explicit a, b and c separately in the legend.

We believe that the overview images provided in figure 4A and the high magnification images provided in figures 4B and 4C adequately illustrate the skin defects in α-pvΔK mice.

Details related to quantification of HFs are totally missing in the Legend or in Material and Methods (how many mice, how many sections per mice, which software, etc…).

We apologize for this shortcoming. We provided all necessary information in revised legend of figure 2.

4. Figure 3b, Figure 4a,b,d and Figure 5: For the same reasons as above, overview should be provided. As mentioned above, some pictures are centered to the repair tissue filling the blister cavity while others are centered on the epidermis outside the damaged areas where the dermal-epidermal junction appears to be intact. This is very confusing.

Thank you for this suggestion. We provide overview images in revised figure 3B and new S2 and S3 figures. Moreover, to avoid any misinterpretations of the results, we have depicted the repair tissue areas in the revised figure 4.

5. The blister level is not within the basement membrane plane since in Fig. 4 the electron micrographs of the knockout animals shown in c, there is a distinct basal lamina in area B. In addition for α-PVΔK skin, there is good positive staining of LN332 in the floor of the blister/filled blister cavity in Fig. 3b, Fig. 4a,b Fig. 4d5.

Thank you for this comment. The skin of α-pvΔK mice showed extensive areas with a discontinuous and disordered BM, where LN332 was also detected in the dermal region below the BM plane. As we mention in the results section we focus our EM analysis in areas with distorted BM.

In conclusion, better illustrations should be provided and interpretation of the results needs a careful re-examination.

Reviewer #2: This is a nice manuscript describing the parvin knockout phenotype in skin. The analysis was interesting and well documented. The authors show that epidermal morphogenesis and hair follicle formation are critically dependent upon this key Integrin signalling component. I recommend publication.

We thank the reviewer for recommending the publication of our manuscript without further modifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: renamed_9d784.docx

Click here for additional data file. (21.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Erik H J Danen

28 Feb 2020

α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and basal keratinocyte polarity

PONE-D-20-01092R1

Dear Dr. Montanez,

Your revised manuscript has been evaluated and we are pleased to inform you that all comments have been adequately addressed, your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication, and it will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Erik H. J. Danen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Erik H J Danen

3 Mar 2020

PONE-D-20-01092R1

α-parvin is required for epidermal morphogenesis, hair follicle development and basal keratinocyte polarity

Dear Dr. Montanez:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Erik H. J. Danen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Histological analysis of back skin sections from 3-day-old control and α-pvΔK mice.

    Hematoxylin-eosin staining of back skin section of 3-days-old control and α-pvΔK mice did not reveal any significant differences between control and α-pvΔK mice. E: epidermis; D: dermis; SC: subcutis; PC: panniculus carnosum. Scale bar: 200 μm.

    (TIF)

    Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, tif)
    S2 Fig. Impaired integrin distribution and distorted BM organization in the skin of α-pvΔK mice (overview images of Fig 4).

    Double-fluorescent labeling for (A) LN332 and β4-integrin, and (B) LN332 and β1-integrin of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. (C) Double-fluorescent labeling for LN332 and Gr1, and LN332 and Mac-1 of control and α-pvΔK skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. E: epidermis, D: dermis, HF: hair follicle and RT: repair tissue.

    (TIF)

    Click here for additional data file. (5.1MB, tif)
    S3 Fig. Impaired keratinocyte differentiation in α-pvΔK mice (overview images of Fig 5D).

    Double-fluorescent labeling for keratin-5 and α6-integrin, keratin-10 and α6-integrin, and loricrin and α6-integrin of control and α-pv-null skin sections. Nuclei were visualized with DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm.

    (TIF)

    Click here for additional data file. (3.3MB, tif)
    S1 Raw images

    (TIF)

    Click here for additional data file. (370.6KB, tif)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: renamed_9d784.docx

    Click here for additional data file. (21.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES