The emergence of multidrug-resistant E. cloacae complex has become a public health threat worldwide. E. xiangfangensis is a recently classified species belonging to E. cloacae complex. Here, we report a clonal dissemination of multidrug-resistant E. xiangfangensis ST200 producing two types of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-type MBL), NDM-1 and -4, and three types of 16S rRNA methylases, ArmA, RmtC, and RmtE, in hospitals in Myanmar. The observation of these multidrug-resistant E. xiangfangensis ST200 isolates stresses the urgency to continue molecular epidemiological surveillance of these pathogens in Myanmar and in South Asian countries.
KEYWORDS: NDM-type metallo-β-lactamase, 16S rRNA methylase, Enterobacter cloacae complex
ABSTRACT
Surveillance of 10 hospitals and a regional public health laboratory in Myanmar identified 31 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex harboring blaNDM-type. Of these isolates, 19 were highly resistant to aminoglycosides and harbored one or more genes encoding 16S rRNA methylases, including armA, rmtB, rmtC, and/or rmtE. Of the 19 isolates, 16 were Enterobacter xiangfangensis ST200, with armA on the chromosome and a plasmid harboring blaNDM-1 and rmtC, indicating that these isolates were clonally disseminated nationwide in Myanmar.
IMPORTANCE The emergence of multidrug-resistant E. cloacae complex has become a public health threat worldwide. E. xiangfangensis is a recently classified species belonging to E. cloacae complex. Here, we report a clonal dissemination of multidrug-resistant E. xiangfangensis ST200 producing two types of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-type MBL), NDM-1 and -4, and three types of 16S rRNA methylases, ArmA, RmtC, and RmtE, in hospitals in Myanmar. The observation of these multidrug-resistant E. xiangfangensis ST200 isolates stresses the urgency to continue molecular epidemiological surveillance of these pathogens in Myanmar and in South Asian countries.
INTRODUCTION
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are the most important enzymes contributing to carbapenem resistance (1). New Delhi MBL (NDM-type MBL) was initially reported in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates from a patient who had traveled from India to Sweden in 2008 (2). Since then, NDM-type MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens have been isolated from patients worldwide (3).
Acquired 16S rRNA methylases are responsible for high-level resistance to various aminoglycosides in Gram-negative pathogens, including Enterobacteriaceae (4). The 16S rRNA methylases ArmA and RmtA were first identified in isolates of K. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively (3). Subsequently, 10 classes of 16S rRNA methylases, including ArmA, RmtB, RmtC, and RmtE, have been detected in clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacteria (3). The geographic distribution of these isolates has been shown to depend on classes of 16S methylase. For example, ArmA and RmtB producers have been detected worldwide, RmtC producers in India and the United Kingdom and RmtE producers in the United States and China (3, 5).
This report describes the spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae complex isolates producing various NDM-type MBLs (NDM-1, -4, -5, and -7) and 16S rRNA methylases (ArmA, RmtB, RmtC, and RmtE) throughout hospitals in Myanmar.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Multidrug-resistant E. cloacae complex.
Ten hospitals and a regional public health laboratory in Myanmar were surveilled for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens between December 2015 and May 2017. Carbapenem-resistant isolates were screened using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), resulting in the detection of 31 isolates of E. cloacae complex resistant to imipenem and/or meropenem from patients at the 10 hospitals and the regional public health laboratory in five regions of Myanmar. These participating facilities were requested to submit carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates; therefore, it is unknown how many isolates were screened in this surveillance. The 31 carbapenem-resistant isolates included 20 from six hospitals in the Yangon Region, four from a hospital and the regional public health laboratory in the Mandalay Region, one from a hospital in the Magway Region, four from a hospital in Mon State and two from a hospital in Naypyidaw Union Territory (see Table S1 and Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Of the 31 isolates, 15 were obtained from urine samples, six from wound swabs, four from blood, three from pus, two from respiratory tracts, and one from peritoneal dialysis fluid (Table S1). All these isolates were positive by CIMTrisII (Kohjin Bio, Saitama, Japan), an improved carbapenem inactivation method for the detection of carbapenemase production (6), and all of them were positive on an immunochromatography assay for NDM-type MBL (7). Antimicrobial susceptibility of these isolates to various antibiotics was tested by the microdilution method according to guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (8) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (9) (Table 1). All the 31 isolates were resistant to carbapenems, including 28 resistant to both imipenem and meropenem and three resistant to either imipenem or meropenem; 19 isolates (61%) were resistant to amikacin; 25 isolates (81%) were resistant to ciprofloxacin; two were resistant to colistin; and 19 were extremely resistant to amikacin and arbekacin with MICs of ≥1,024 μg/ml (Table 1 and Table S1). No isolates were resistant to tigecycline (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Antibiotic | Breakpoint for resistance (μg/ml) |
% resistance | MIC (μg/ml) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | |||
Amikacin | ≥64 | 61 | 0.5 to ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 |
Arbekacin | <0.25 to ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 | ||
Aztreonam | ≥14 | 81 | 0.5 to ≥1,024 | 256 | ≥1,024 |
Ceftazidime | ≥64 | 100 | ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 | ≥1,024 |
Ciprofloxacin | ≥4 | 81 | 0.25 to ≥1,024 | 128 | 256 |
Colistin | >2 | 6 | 0.0016 to ≥16 | 0.125 | 0.5 |
Imipenem | ≥4 | 94 | 2 to 256 | 16 | 64 |
Meropenem | ≥4 | 97 | 2 to 256 | 32 | 128 |
Tigecycline | ≥8 | 0 | 0.125 to 2 | 1 | 2 |
Breakpoints for microbial resistance were determined according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for amikacin, aztreonam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and meropenem; of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for colistin; and of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for tigecycline.
Drug resistance genes from E. cloacae complex.
All 31 isolates of E. cloacae complex harbored one of four genes encoding NDM-type MBLs, including blaNDM-1 (25 isolates), blaNDM-4 (4 isolates), blaNDM-5 (one isolate), and blaNDM-7 (one isolate). Of these isolates, 19 harbored one, two, or three genes encoding 16S rRNA methylases, including armA, rmtB, rmtC, and/or rmtE. Specifically, 11 harbored armA and rmtC, and five harbored armA, rmtC, and rmtE (Table 2 and Table S1). Most of the 31 isolates harbored the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes aac(6′)-lb-cr (n = 26) (these genes of the 26 isolates were confirmed in GenBank [accession no. DQ303918 and EF636461]) and qnr (n = 29) (10) and had amino acid substitutions in DNA gyrase (Ser/Thr83 and/or Asp87 in GyrA) (n = 25) and topoisomerase IV (Ser80 in ParC) (n = 16) (Table 2 and Table S1). The two colistin-resistant isolates had amino acid substitutions in PmrB (Gly275Asp and Phe112Tyr/Asp274Glu/Gln294Glu, respectively), which are associated with greater colistin resistance than in type strains (Table S1).
TABLE 2.
MLST | No. of isolates |
Gene(s) encoding: |
|
---|---|---|---|
Carbapenemase and β-lactamase | 16S rRNA methylase and aminoglycoside acetyltransferase |
||
ST66 | 1 | blaNDM-1, blaACT-7, blaTEM-1B | aadA1, aph(3″)-lb, aph(3′)-Vl, aph(6)-ld |
ST90 | 1 | blaNDM-1, blaACT-15, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1 | armA, aac(6')-lb3, aadA1b, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST114 | 2 | blaNDM-1, blaACT-16, blaCTX-M-15 (1/2), blaDHA-1 | aac(6')-lb3, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST171 | 2 |
blaNDM-1 (1/2), blaNDM-4 (1/2), blaACT-7, blaCTX-M-15 (1/2), blaOXA-1 (1/2), blaTEM-1B (1/2) |
aac(3)-lla (1/2), aadA1, aadA2 (1/2), aph(3')-la (1/2), aph(3”)-lb (1/2), aph(6)-ld (1/2), aac(6')-lb-cr (1/2) |
ST182 | 1 | blaNDM-1, blaACT-16, blaTEM-1B | aadA1, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld |
ST200 | 18 |
blaNDM-1 (16/18), blaNDM-4 (2/18), blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1 (1/18), blaTEM-1B |
armA (16/18), rmtC (16/18), rmtE (5/18), aac(3)-lld (16/18), aac(6')-lb3 (16/18), aadA2 (16/18), aph(3')-Vl (14/18), aac(3)-lla (2/18), aadA1 (2/18), aph(3”)-lb (2/18), aph(6)-ld (2/18), aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST312 | 1 |
blaNDM-4, blaACT-7, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaOXA-10, blaTEM-1B, blaVEB-1 |
aac(3)-lla, aadA1, aadA2, ant(2”)-la, aph(3”)-lb, aph(3')-la, aph(6)-ld, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST513 | 1 |
blaNDM-1, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B |
armA, aac(3)-lla, aac(6')-lb3, aadA1, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST916 | 1 |
blaNDM-7, blaACT-7, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B |
aac(6')-llc, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ST1053 | 1 |
blaNDM-1, blaACT-16, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B |
aac(3)-lla, aac(6')-lb3, aadA1, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld, aac(6')-lb-cr |
NDa | 1 | blaNDM-5, blaMIR-5, blaTEM-1B | rmtB, aadA2, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld |
NDb | 1 |
blaNDM-1, blaACT-7, blaCTX-M-15, blaDHA-1, blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B |
aac(3)-lla, aac(6')-lb3, aadA1, aph(3”)-lb, aph(6)-ld, aac(6')-lb-cr |
ND, not determined. An isolate of E. nimipressuralis did not harbor lueS, a housekeeping gene used to determine E. cloacae MLST.
Not determined. An isolate of E. xiangfangensis did not harbor pyrG, a housekeeping gene used to determine E. cloacae MLST.
Drug susceptibility phenotype and drug resistance genotype.
As shown by drug susceptibility phenotypes and drug resistance genotypes of individual isolates in Table S1, all the 31 isolates harbored blaNDM-type, with 28 being resistant to both imipenem and meropenem and the remaining 3 resistant to either imipenem or meropenem. Nineteen isolates were extremely resistant to aminoglycosides and harbored 16S rRNA methylase-encoding genes, whereas the remaining 12 did not. Twenty-five isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, harbored plasmids bearing the quinolone resistance genes aac(6′)-lb-cr and/or qnr, and had amino acid substitutions in GyrA and/or ParC. The remaining six were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, although they harbored aac(6′)-lb-cr and/or qnr and did not have any mutations in gyrA and parC. Of 2 colistin-resistant isolates with amino acid substitutions in PmrB, an isolate with one amino acid substitution (Gly275Asp) showed a higher MIC of colistin (≥256 μg/ml) than that for another isolate with three amino acid substitutions (Phe112Tyr/Asp274Glu/Gln294Glu) (16 μg/ml), indicating that the Gly275Asp substitution plays a critical role in high colistin resistance.
Phylogenetic analysis.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed that 29 of all the 31 isolates belonged to one of 10 sequence types (STs) and the STs of the remaining 2 isolates were not determined. Of the 29 isolates, 18 belonged to ST200 (Table 2). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculation and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) revealed that, of the 31 isolates, 29 were Enterobacter xiangfangensis, one was E. cloacae, and one was Enterobacter nimipressuralis (Table S2). Phylogenetic analysis of the 31 E. cloacae complex isolates revealed three clades, in good agreement with the three species of E. cloacae complex, with 29 isolates of E. xiangfangensis belonging to clade 1 and one isolate each of E. cloacae and E. nimipressuralis belonging to the other two clades. Of the 29 isolates belonging to clade 1, 18 belonged to ST200, with 16 subclustered in the phylogenetic tree to group 1 and two clustered to group 2 (Fig. 1). All the isolates belonging to group 1 harbored blaNDM-1, armA, and rmtC, with five of these also harboring rmtE. The two isolates belonging to group 2 harbored blaNDM-4 but did not harbor any genes encoding a 16S rRNA methylase.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization were performed using 18 isolates belonging to ST200. Of them, 16 harbored blaNDM-1 and rmtC in a plasmid and armA on a chromosome and two harbored blaNDM-4 in a plasmid (Fig. S2). Further, of the 16 isolates, blaNDM-1 and rmtC were detected in same-size plasmids and three isolates harbored rmtE in a plasmid (Fig. S2).
Comparative analysis of E. xiangfangensis ST200.
The whole-genome sequences of three isolates of E. xiangfangensis harboring armA, rmtC, and rmtE were determined using MinION and MiSeq. Reads generated by these sequencers were assembled, yielding the complete sequences of the chromosomes and plasmids of these three isolates (Table S3). The chromosomes of the three E. xiangfangensis isolates were similar in size (5.2 Mbp). The three E. xiangfangensis isolates had three or four plasmids, of which a 57,085-bp plasmid harbored both blaNDM-1 and rmtC in three isolates (MY146, MY458, and MY460). The sequence of the 57,085-bp plasmid had 99% similarity with that of the 57,089-bp plasmid pM308-NDM1 (accession no. AP018832), which had been isolated from E. xiangfangensis obtained in Myanmar (11). The three isolates also had a plasmid harboring an identical genetic environment of rmtE, but the sizes were different among them, 118,668 bp (accession no. LC511996), 119,259 bp (accession no. LC511995), and 345,906 bp (accession no. LC511997), respectively (Table S3). The sequence of the 118,668-bp plasmid had 99% similarity with that of the 119,259-bp plasmid (Fig. S3). The 345,906-bp plasmid had a structure similar to that of the 118,668-bp and 119,259-bp plasmids (Fig. S3). The other structure of the 345,906-bp plasmid was similar to that of pSJO-60984 (accession no. CP025277) (Fig. S3). Collectively, these results of MinION and MiSeq analyses of the three isolates were consistent with the results of Southern hybridization of the 16 isolates.
Carbapenem-resistant E. xiangfangensis clonal complex 200 (CC200) harboring genes encoding metallo-β-lactamase may be spreading in hospitals throughout Europe and Asia. E. xiangfangensis CC200 (ST105 and ST200) harboring blaVIM-1 has been detected in Croatia and Turkey (12), and six clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant E. xiangfangensis ST200 harboring blaNDM-1 were detected at a hospital in Yangon, Myanmar (11). As summarized in Table 3, clinical isolates of E. xiangfangensis ST200 coharboring blaNDM-1, armA, and rmtC were obtained from all five regions/states in Myanmar, indicating that these isolates are spreading among hospitals nationwide in Myanmar. In addition, E. xiangfangensis ST200 coharboring blaNDM-1, armA, rmtC, and rmtE is emerging in Yangon Region (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
ST200 (18 isolates) |
Drug resistance gene(s) | Region(s) (no. of isolates) |
---|---|---|
11 isolates | blaNDM-1 and rmtC (plasmida ), armA (chromosome) | Yangon (7), Naypyitaw (1), Mandalay (1), Mon (1), Magway (1) |
5 isolates | blaNDM-1 and rmtC (plasmida ), rmtE (plasmid), armA (chromosome) | Yangon (5) |
2 isolates | blaNDM-4 (plasmid) | Naypyitaw (1), Mandalay (1) |
A 57-kbp plasmid harboring blaNDM-1 and rmtC.
It is unclear the reason why 16 E. xiangfangensis isolates harbored multiple (two or three) genes encoding 16S rRNA methylases (Table 3). At least two studies reported that clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in India (13) and of Enterobacteriaceae in the United Kingdom and Ireland (14) coharbored 16S rRNA methylase genes. There is no functional reason for these isolates to harbor the multiple genes because the 16S rRNA methylases target the same residue, G1405, of 16S rRNA (3). Dissemination and accumulation of these genes in some regions, and plasmids coharboring these genes with other drug resistance genes, may result in harboring of these types of multiple 16S rRNA methylase genes.
In conclusion, this study confirmed that E. xiangfangensis ST200, resistant to carbapenems and multiple aminoglycosides, is spreading in Myanmar and that these isolates harbored several types of drug resistance genes on different plasmids. Although the rates of these multidrug-resistant E. cloacae complex isolates in hospitals in Myanmar were not determined in this study, we have a plan to conduct surveillance to determine the rate in Myanmar. Epidemiological surveillance is required to prevent the emergence and spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens harboring various types of drug resistance genes in Myanmar.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA isolation and whole-genome sequencing.
Bacterial DNA was extracted using DNeasy blood and tissue kits (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan), and their complete genomes were sequenced using MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The raw reads were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench version 10.0.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark).
Genomic analysis.
Species of these isolates were determined using the ANI calculator (15, 16) and dDDH (17). The complete genome sequences of 3 indicated isolates of E. cloacae complex were determined using MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom). The raw reads were base called by Albacore v2.3.1, and trimmer adapters were base called by Porechop v0.2.3 (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop). The long reads generated by MinION and the short reads generated by MiSeq were assembled using Unicycler (18). The sequences of drug resistance genes were determined using ResFinder 3.1 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed according to the instructions of the Enterobacter cloacae MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/ecloacae/) (19).
Phylogenetic tree and genetic structure.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed using kSNP3 ver.3.1 software (20) and visualized using FigTree ver.1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). The genetic structures were compared in Easyfig (21).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization.
The locations of drug resistance genes encoding NDM-type MBLs and 16S rRNA methylases were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization.
Ethics approval.
The study protocol was approved by the Ministry of Health and Sports in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (Ethical Committee 2016), by the ethics committee of Juntendo University (number 809), and by the Biosafety Committee, Juntendo University (approval numbers BSL2/29-1). The information allowed about patients included age, gender, and sample tissues.
Accession number(s).
The whole-genome sequences of all 31 isolates have been deposited in GenBank as accession no. DRA009282. Three plasmids isolated in this study have been deposited in GenBank as accession no. LC511996 (118,668 bp), accession no. LC511995 (119,259 bp), and accession no. LC511997 (345,906 bp).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant numbers 18K07120, 18K07121, 19K16652, and 19KK0203), the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant number 19fk0108061h0302), and the JU Research Fund (Keiko Yamazaki). S.W. received the endowed chair from Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd.
We declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bush K. 2001. New β-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria: diversity and impact on the selection of antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis 32:1085–1089. doi: 10.1086/319610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Walsh TR. 2009. Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Doi Y, Wachino J-I, Arakawa Y. 2016. Aminoglycoside resistance: the emergence of acquired 16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferases. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:523–537. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wachino JI, Arakawa Y. 2012. Exogenously acquired 16S rRNA methyltransferases found in aminoglycoside-resistant pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria: an update. Drug Resist Updat 15:133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xia J, Sun J, Li L, Fang LX, Deng H, Yang RS, Li XP, Liao XP, Liu YH. 2015. First report of the IncI1/ST898 conjugative plasmid carrying rmtE2 16S rRNA methyltransferase gene in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7921–7922. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01235-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uechi K, Tada T, Kuwahara-Arai K, Sekiguchi JI, Yanagisawa I, Tome T, Nakasone I, Maeda S, Mya S, Zan KN, Tin HH, Kirikae T, Fujita J. 2019. An improved carbapenem inactivation method, CIMTrisII, for carbapenemase production by Gram-negative pathogens. J Med Microbiol 68:124–131. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tada T, Sekiguchi J-I, Watanabe S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Mizutani N, Yanagisawa I, Hishinuma T, Zan KN, Mya S, Tin HH, Kirikae T. 2019. Assessment of a newly developed immunochromatographic assay for NDM-type metallo-β-lactamase producing Gram-negative pathogens in Myanmar. BMC Infect Dis 19:565. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4147-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 28rd informational supplement, M100-S28. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 9.US Food and Drug Administration. 2019. FDA-recognized antimicrobial susceptibility test interpretive criteria. US Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-resources/fda-recognized-antimicrobial-susceptibility-test-interpretive-criteria.
- 10.Hooper DC, Jacoby GA. 2015. Mechanisms of drug resistance: quinolone resistance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1354:12–31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sugawara Y, Akeda Y, Hagiya H, Sakamoto N, Takeuchi D, Shanmugakani RK, Motooka D, Nishi I, Zin KN, Aye MM, Myint T, Tomono K, Hamada S. 2019. Spreading patterns of NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical and environmental settings in Yangon, Myanmar. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01924-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01924-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Matsumura Y, Peirano G, Devinney R, Bradford PA, Motyl MR, Adams MD, Chen L, Kreiswirth B, Pitout J. 2017. Genomic epidemiology of global VIM-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2249–2258. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohanam L, Menon T. 2017. Emergence of rmtC and rmtF 16S rRNA methyltransferase in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Indian J Med Microbiol 35:282–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taylor E, Sriskandan S, Woodford N, Hopkins KL. 2018. High prevalence of 16S rRNA methyltransferases among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the UK and Ireland. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:278–282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. 2017. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. 2005. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Hayakawa K, Ohmagari N, Shimojima M, Kirikae T. 2013. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for characterization of Enterobacter cloacae. PLoS One 8:e66358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gardner SN, Slezak T, Hall BG. 2015. kSNP3.0: SNP detection and phylogenetic analysis of genomes without genome alignment or reference genome. Bioinformatics 31:2877–2878. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.