Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Mar 12;10:4551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61425-0

Heme b distributions through the Atlantic Ocean: evidence for “anemic” phytoplankton populations

Evangelia Louropoulou 1,2,, Martha Gledhill 1, Eric P Achterberg 1, Thomas J Browning 1, David J Honey 3, Ruth A Schmitz 2, Alessandro Tagliabue 4
PMCID: PMC7067765  PMID: 32165723

Abstract

Heme b is an iron-containing cofactor in hemoproteins that participates in the fundamental processes of photosynthesis and respiration in phytoplankton. Heme b concentrations typically decline in waters with low iron concentrations but due to lack of field data, the distribution of heme b in particulate material in the ocean is poorly constrained. Here we report particulate heme b distributions across the Atlantic Ocean (59.9°N to 34.6°S). Heme b concentrations in surface waters ranged from 0.10 to 33.7 pmol L−1 (median = 1.47 pmol L−1, n = 974) and were highest in regions with a high biomass. The ratio of heme b to particulate organic carbon (POC) exhibited a mean value of 0.44 μmol heme b mol−1 POC. We identified the ratio of 0.10 µmol heme b mol−1 POC as the cut-off between heme b replete and heme b deficient (anemic) phytoplankton. By this definition, we observed anemic phytoplankton populations in the Subtropical South Atlantic and Irminger Basin. Comparison of observed and modelled heme b suggested that heme b could account for between 0.17–9.1% of biogenic iron. Our large scale observations of heme b relative to organic matter provide further evidence of the impact of changes in iron supply on phytoplankton iron status across the Atlantic Ocean.

Subject terms: Biogeochemistry, Ecology, Environmental sciences, Ocean sciences

Introduction

Iron constitutes one of the most important nutrients for phytoplankton1 because it is a component of biomolecules, termed cofactors, that participate in fundamental metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, nitrogen and sulphate assimilation2,3. The iron-containing cofactors are grouped based on the coordination and chemical bonds of iron with other elements within the molecule, and one major group of iron cofactors are hemes4.

Hemes are iron-containing porphyrins of different structures that act as cofactors (i.e. prosthetic groups) in hemoproteins5, and are produced via the tetrapyrrole synthesis pathway5. Ambient iron concentrations control heme biosynthesis and thus intracellular heme concentrations4. Heme b (iron protoporphyrin IX) is considered the most common heme structure within an organism6 and is a constituent of the b type cytochromes, catalases, peroxidases, cytochrome P450, globins and nitrate reductase7,8. Hence, heme b is involved in electron transport and catalysis of hydrogen and other peroxides as well as oxygen control, oxygen-storage and oxygen-transport8. Some marine bacteria are known to use dissolved hemes in seawater as a direct source of iron911. In cyanobacteria, rhodophytes and cryptophytes, hemes are further metabolised to phycobilins via heme oxygenase12. Phycobilins function as chromophores in the light-harvesting phycobiliproteins and the photoreceptor phytochrome12,13.

Hemoproteins make up approximately 40% of the intracellular iron pool in phytoplankton, with hemoproteins containing heme b contributing towards approximately half of this amount14. Honey, et al.15 demonstrated that heme b accounts for between 1 to 40% of the total biogenic iron pool in marine phytoplankton (mean 18 ± 14%). At low iron concentrations in culture media (≤0.50 nmol L−1), 6 to 26% of the available iron was utilized for production of heme b cofactors for species from temperate ocean areas15. This percentage ranged from 0.2 to 16% for species from high latitude ocean regions16. These findings suggested that, similarly to iron-use efficiencies14, the heme b quota required for growth is also variable amongst species and growth conditions15,16.

To date, several studies have documented that low oceanic iron concentrations (<0.20 nmol L−1) lead in general to a decrease in growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation rates of phytoplankton3,1722. Although a number of studies have documented the declines in the abundance of several iron proteins in cultured phytoplankton2330, only a few studies report the abundances of such proteins in the field3135.

Iron deficiency in higher organisms is expressed by decreases in hemoprotein levels (e.g. hemoglobin). This condition is commonly described as “anemia” which literally refers to heme-iron deficiency. In a similar manner, reduced iron supply in the surface waters in the ocean leads to anemic phytoplankton. Hence, in both cultured and field phytoplankton populations, the concentrations of heme b tend to fall below 1.0 pmol L−1 under low iron (≤0.5 nmol L−1) conditions15,16,35,36. However, certain eukaryotes (Phaeocystis, Chaeotoceros, Rhizosolenia spp.) appear able to maintain growth despite the low heme b concentrations16,36. These species are considered to regulate and reduce intracellular heme b concentrations by allocating the available iron away from the hemoprotein pool in order to maintain other metabolic processes16,36. Heme b regulation is considered a response of phytoplankton to declining ambient iron concentrations that depends on species- specific requirements in iron and thus may be observed in the field during the iron-induced shifts37 from larger- to smaller-sized phytoplankton populations36.

In this study we present an extensive dataset of heme b abundance in the Atlantic Ocean. We synthesise previously published15,16,36 and new field data covering areas from the subpolar North Atlantic to the subtropical South Atlantic. Since the factors driving the heme b distribution in the natural environment are still uncertain, our aim was to examine physical, chemical and biological processes that potentially influence heme b. The Atlantic Ocean is a good study region for this purpose as it consists of several provinces that exhibit contrasting abundances of iron and macronutrients. In particular, the Atlantic Ocean is an area of scientific interest as it is subject to large spatial variability in iron supply38,39 with potential impacts on primary productivity, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling4045, and carbon export46. Furthermore, low iron supply in the Atlantic Ocean has been connected to reductions in primary productivity47,48, oceanic CO2 uptake rates by phytoplankton48 and nitrogen fixation rates41 with potential consequences for the global climate49.

Finally, taking into account the laboratory experiments that showed that heme b makes up a significant portion of the total biogenic iron pool in marine phytoplankton, heme b could potentially provide an assessment of iron utilization in situ. Hence, the second part of our study examines (1) the comparability of field heme b concentrations to predicted heme b from the total biogenic iron pool using a global biogeochemical model, and (2) the potential utility of heme b as an indicator of the magnitude of the biogenic iron pool in the field.

Results and discussion

Study region

We compiled newly analysed (unpublished) and previously published data from the Atlantic Ocean collected over a time span from 2005 to 2016. We present here new data (total of 306 data points for heme b) from the research cruises M121 (2015) and M124 (2016) in the South Atlantic. We further obtained published data (total of 668 data points for heme b) for the research cruises CD17316, D34615, D36150 and GEOVIDE36. Details on the expeditions are listed in Table 1 in chronological order and a map of the sampling areas and stations is shown in Fig. 1. These research expeditions and thus datasets cover several biogeochemical provinces of the Atlantic Ocean. For statistical analysis, data interpretation and discussion, we grouped the sampled stations into sub-regions according to the geographical location and the chlorophyll a (chl a) distribution. Here we list these regions in geographical order (north to south); Labrador Sea, Irminger Basin, Iceland Basin, Celtic Sea, Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre, Tropical North Atlantic, Coastal Tropical North Atlantic, Tropical South Atlantic, Angola Current, Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre and Benguela Current.

Table 1.

List of the research cruises in the Atlantic Ocean included in this study and number of total heme b data points (i.e. both above and below the mixed layer depth) per cruise.

Cruise ID Oceanographic Area Year Month(s) Research Vessel Heme b data points References
CD173 Celtic Sea 2005 July-August RRS Charles Darwin 29 16
D346 Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre 2010 January-February RRS Discovery 379 15
D361

Tropical North Atlantic

Tropical South Atlantic

2011 February-March RRS Discovery 89 50
GEOVIDE Subpolar and Subtropical North Atlantic Ocean 2014 May-June RV Pourquoi Pas? 171 36
M121

(Sub)-Tropical South Atlantic

Benguela Upwelling

Angola Dome – Congo Plume

2015 December FS Meteor 254 This study
M124 Subtropical South Atlantic 2016 February-March FS Meteor 52 This study

References indicate previous studies where heme b data were published.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sampling map of research cruises from 2005 to 2015 included in this study, listed here geographically from north to south. Boxes mark the broader region and track of each research cruise; (1) GEOVIDE cruise (GEOTRACES – GA01 section) in May-April 2014, (2) CD173 in July-August 2005, (3) D346 in January-February 2010, (4) D361 (GEOTRACES – GA06 section) in February-March 2011, (5) M121 (GEOTRACES – GA08 section) in December 2015, and (6) M124 in February-March 2016. Dots indicate the sampled stations. Colours indicate the grouping of data in oceanographic regions listed here geographically from North to South; Labrador Sea (LS), Irminger Basin (IrmB), Iceland Basin (IceB), Celtic Sea (CS), Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre (SNAG), Tropical North Atlantic (TNA), Coastal Tropical North Atlantic (CTNA), Tropical South Atlantic (TSA), Angola Current (AnC), Benguela Current (BnC) and Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (SSAG). The figure was produced using Ocean Data View99 v.4.7.9 (Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. 2018, https://odv.awi.de/).

Particulate organic carbon and chlorophyll a

Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 63.5 μmol L−1 (median = 3.1 μmol L−1, n = 1137) for all oceanographic regions from the surface down to 220 m depth. The highest concentrations of POC were determined in the high latitude North Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea, Irminger Basin, Iceland Basin; median = 5.6 μmol L−1, n = 203) and the coastal areas (Celtic Sea, Coastal Tropical North Atlantic, Angola Current, Benguela Current; median = 8.0 μmol L−1, n = 195). Concentrations of POC were lowest in both subtropical gyres (North Atlantic Gyre, South Atlantic Gyre) and open ocean stations of the Tropical North and South Atlantic with a median value of 2.4 μmol L−1 (n = 752).

Chlorophyll a concentrations ranged from <0.01 to 10.7 nmol L−1 (median = 2.0 nmol L−1, n = 1272) overall (0–220 m depth). Similar to POC, chl a was highest in the subpolar North Atlantic (Labrador Sea, Irminger Basin, Iceland Basin; median = 0.50 nmol L−1, n = 186) and the coastal areas (Celtic Sea, Coastal Tropical North Atlantic, Angola Current, Benguela Current; median = 0.38 nmol L−1, n = 311). Lower concentrations of chl a were determined in tropical areas (Tropical North Atlantic, Tropical South Atlantic; median = 0.21 nmol L−1, n = 128) and in the subtropical gyres (North Atlantic Gyre, South Atlantic Gyre; median = 0.13 nmol L−1, n = 66). The lowest chl a values were observed in the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre, where we determined a median concentration of 0.03 nmol L−1. Our results are comparable to those reported during the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) cruises in this region5153.

Depth profiles (Supplementary Fig. S1) of POC and chl a indicated generally higher concentration within the surface mixed layer (SML) that decreased with depth (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p < 0.01). However, clear Deep Chlorophyll Maxima (DCM) were also present in most of the oceanographic regions (i.e. Labrador Sea, Celtic Sea, (sub-)tropical North Atlantic, Angola Current, Benguela Current and (sub-)tropical South Atlantic) (Supplementary Fig. S1). A summary of the median concentrations and the ranges of POC and chl a in the SML is reported on Table 2. Plots A and B in Fig. 2 illustrate the median concentrations of POC and chl a respectively for each sampling station across the Atlantic Ocean. Chlorophyll a correlated with POC (Spearman’s rho, r = 0.57, n = 556, p < 0.01) in the SML (Supplementary Fig. S2A). The Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed statistically significant differences among the oceanographic regions (H = 334, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3A,B).

Table 2.

Statistics summary table of heme b, chlorophyll a (chl a), particulate organic carbon (POC), heme b:POC and heme b:chl a in the eleven oceanographic regions in the Atlantic Ocean from 2005 to 2015.

Region Stats Heme b Chl a POC heme b:POC Heme b:chl a
(pmol L−1) (nmol L−1) (μmol L−1) (μmol mol−1) (mol mol−1)
Labrador Sea Median 2.5 1.2 13.5 0.20 1.9
Range 0.82 ± 4.3 0.20 ± 7.4 1.7 ± 40.0 0.03 ± 0.41 0.18 ± 7.5
No. samples (16) (31) (34) (16) (14)
Irminger Basin Median 0.53 2.0 14.3 0.03 0.20
Range 0.16 ± 4.0 0.32 ± 4.8 5.4 ± 36.4 0.01 ± 0.61 0.07 ± 9.4
No. samples (17) (30) (33) (17) (15)
Iceland Basin Median 3.2 0.77 10.9 0.28 3.8
Range 1.5 ± 4.6 0.47 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 19.7 0.16 ± 0.70 2.2 ± 5.7
No. samples (9) (18) (14) (7) (9)
Celtic Sea Median 4.1 0.47 10.1 0.43 9.32
Range 3.1 ± 5.3 0.21 ± 0.72 8.2 ± 12.2 0.28 ± 0.60 7.8 ± 16.3
No. samples (12) (29) (9) (9) (11)
Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre Median 1.2 0.15 2.3 0.52 8.3
Range 0.30 ± 5.1 0.05 ± 1.4 0.16 ± 23.5 0.06 ± 6.2 0.88 ± 22.7
No. samples (296) (340) (313) (273) (296)
Tropical North Atlantic Median 0.6 0.21 1.3 0.37 2.9
Range 0.23 ± 3.0 0.10 ± 0.57 0.73 ± 3.0 0.13 ± 3.1 0.77 ± 79.6
No. samples (30) (51) (49) (27) (30)
Coastal Tropical North Atlantic Median 4.2 2.3 15.2 0.27 1.4
Range 0.89 ± 15.7 1.42 ± 6.6 4.6 ± 22.6 0.09 ± 1.49 0.47 ± 7.8
No. samples (14) (13) (14) (14) (13)
Tropical South Atlantic Median 0.55 0.08 6.0 0.16 10.0
Range 0.22 ± 1.5 0.02 ± 0.23 1.0 ± 10.2 0.05 ± 0.70 1.8 ± 36.3
No. samples (20) (22) (20) (20) (20)
Angola Current Median 1.6 0.12 6.2 0.25 9.7
Range 1.60 ± 7.5 0.01 ± 0.79 1.4 ± 13.1 0.01 ± 0.98 1.5 ± 215
No. samples (24) (24) (24) (23) (22)
Benguela Current Median 6.2 0.91 22.0 0.31 6.0
Range 0.25 ± 33.7 0.05 ± 7.4 5.6 ± 63.5 0.02 ± 1.5 0.9 ± 138
No. samples (35) (34) (35) (35) (32)
Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre Median 0.51 0.03 4.9 0.09 12.7
Range 0.20 ± 4.5 0.01 ± 1.6 2.4 ± 13.6 0.04 ± 0.67 0.32 ± 45.6
No. samples (29) (36) (33) (27) (28)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Spatial distribution of (A) Particulate organic carbon (POC), (B) chlorophyll a (chl a), (C) heme b, (D) heme b:POC, (E) heme b:chl a, and (F) chl a:POC. Values represent median the values calculated for the Surface Mixed Layer (SML). Dots indicate the sampled stations. The figure was produced using Ocean Data View99 v.4.7.9 (Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. 2018, https://odv.awi.de/).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Boxplots of distributions in the surface mixed layer (SML) of (A) Particulate Organic Carbon (POC), (B) chlorophyll a (chl a), (C) heme b, (D) the ratio heme b:POC, and (E) the ratio heme b:chl a for the eleven oceanographic regions; Labrador Sea (LS), Labrador Sea (LS), Irminger Basin (IrmB), Iceland Basin (IceB), Celtic Sea (CS), Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre (SNAG), Tropical North Atlantic (TNA), Coastal Tropical North Atlantic (CTNA), Tropical South Atlantic (TSA), Angola Current (AnC), Benguella Current (BnC) and Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (SSAG). The boxes show the interquartile range (IQR) of values. The bold lines inside the boxes indicate the median value for each region and divide the boxes the 25th (bottom) and 75th (upper) percentiles. The upper whisker represents the largest value no farther than 1.5 times the IQR, and the bottom whisker indicates the smallest value no farther than 1.5 times the IQR. Dots represent the outliers of the distributions. On top of sub-plots A, B, C, D and E the result of the Kruskal-Wallis test is annotated. Letters (letters a to d) below the boxes indicate the Compact Letter Display (cld) of the statistically significant different groups in the SML after a Post-hoc test for multiple comparisons of groups. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of data points used per box for each parameter. The figure was produced using R Statistical Software97 v.1.0.136 (R core team, 2016, https://www.R-project.org).

The ratio of chl a:POC ranged from 0.21 to 8286 μmol mol−1 (SMLmedian = 67.3 μmol mol−1, n = 550: DCMmedian = 40.6 μmol mol−1, n = 520) for the whole dataset (Fig. 2C). The highest values in the SML were determined in the Coastal Tropical North Atlantic (median = 189 μmol mol−1, n = 13) and the Tropical North Atlantic (median = 155 μmol mol−1, n = 48) whilst chl a:POC was lowest in the subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (median = 7.62 μmol mol−1, n = 32). Statistically significant differences were determined between the SML and the DCM (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p < 0.01) and between oceanographic regions (SML: H = 253.27, df  = 10, p < 0.01) which were mainly attributed to the differences between the North (sub-) tropical Atlantic (i.e. Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre, Tropical North Atlantic and Coastal Tropical North Atlantic) and the South Atlantic (Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre). Large differences between chl a:POC ratios in the North And South Atlantic have also been observed previously and are thought to be strongly influenced by phytoplankton physiology53.

Heme b concentrations and ratios

Heme b concentrations ranged from 0.10 to 33.7 pmol L−1 (median = 1.16 pmol L−1, n = 974) from the surface layer down to 200 m depth. The depth profiles of heme b (Supplementary Fig. S1) indicated that heme b was typically higher in the SML (SML: median = 1.23 pmol L−1, n = 502) and decreased with depth (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.01) except for the cases where a DCM was present (Labrador Sea, Celtic Sea and Benguela Current).

The median concentration of heme b in the SML is shown in Fig. 2D. Statistically significant differences were observed in the spatial distribution of heme b in the SML for the various oceanographic regions (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 206, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3C). Significantly higher concentrations were observed in the SML of the coastal regions (Celtic Sea, Coastal Tropical North Atlantic, Angola Current, Benguela Current), ranging from 0.10 to 33.7 pmol L−1 (median = 4.1 pmol L−1, n = 85). These regions include two upwelling areas (Coastal Tropical North Atlantic and Benguela Current) and the Congo river plume located in the Angola region; hence, heme b was highest in the Benguela area (median = 6.2 nmol L−1, n = 14) (Fig. 4) followed by the Coastal Tropical North Atlantic (median = 4.2 nmol L−1, n = 14) (Table 2). In addition, heme b was also enhanced in the highly productive subpolar areas (Iceland Basin, Greenland Shelf and Labrador Sea) which were sampled during the spring bloom in 2014 (range 0.16–4.6 pmol L−1, median = 2.2 pmol L−1, n = 48)36. However, the Irminger Basin deviated from this pattern, despite being sampled in the same season, exhibiting the lowest heme b concentrations (median = 0.53 pmol L−1, n = 17)36, along with the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (median = 0.51 pmol L−1, n = 29) and the offshore stations in the tropical Atlantic (Tropical South Atlantic and Tropical North Atlantic, median = 0.58 pmol L−1, n = 50).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Section plots of heme b, chlorophyll a (chl a), particulate organic carbon (POC) and total oxidized nitrogen (TON – sum of nitrite and nitrate) along the coast of Africa during the M121 cruise (December 2015). The contour plots correspond to the stations closest to the coast (13–17 °E). Dashed lines indicate the Mixed Layer Depth (MLD). Dots indicate the sampled stations and the data points available. Letter annotations indicate the two oceanographic regions encountered which were the Benguela Current and Angola Current regions. The figure was produced using Ocean Data View99 v.4.7.9 (Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. 2018, https://odv.awi.de/).

Heme b correlated with both POC (Spearman’s rho, r = 0.41, n = 465, p < 0.01) and chl a (Spearman’s rho, r = 0.56, n = 490, p < 0.01) (Supplementary Fig. S2B,C) in the SML. These results along with the average depth profiles of heme b, chl a and POC (Supplementary Fig. S1) suggest that both the spatial and the vertical distribution of heme b concentrations in the Atlantic Ocean were strongly influenced by biomass, as observed previously15. However, heme b was shown in previous studies to vary due to phytoplankton regulation strategies that occur as adaptation responses to iron-limitation16,36, thus weakening the overall correlation of heme b relative to POC.

In order to examine the changes of heme b relative to biomass as indicated by POC and chl a, we calculated the ratios of heme b:POC and heme b: chl a16,35. The heme b:POC ratio represents the heme b per unit carbon derived from the total particulate organic matter and previous field studies showed that this ratio varied as a result of iron availability15,16,35,36. The ratio heme b: chl a corresponds to organic matter originating from phytoplankton, but because of intracellular chlorophyll variability, can also be influenced by light- and nutrient-driven changes in the photosystem.

In this study, heme b: POC ranged overall from 0.01 to 6.2 μmol mol−1 (median = 0.39 μmol mol−1, n = 907). However, the difference in values between the two layers (above and below the SML) was statistically significant (Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p < 0.01), with heme b: POC significantly higher in the DCM. The depth profiles (Supplementary Fig. S1) showed that the increase in heme b: POC in the DCMs was accompanied by an increase in the chl a:POC suggesting photoacclimation of phytoplankton to low light and higher investment in the photosynthetic proteins15,54,55. Statistically significant differences were observed for the SML for the various oceanographic regions in heme b:POC (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 153, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3D). The lowest values of heme b:POC were determined in the Irminger Basin (SML: median = 0.03 μmol mol−1, n = 17) and the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (SML: median = 0.08 μmol mol−1, n = 27) suggesting a decoupling of heme b from POC in these regions (Fig. 2E). Similarly, we observed statistically significant differences among the oceanographic regions for the heme b:chl a ratio (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 146, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3E). Heme b:chl a ratios ranged overall from 0.07 to 327 mmol mol−1 (median = 7.3 mmol mol−1, n = 942) and followed a different pattern of spatial distribution in the SML compared to heme b:POC (Fig. 2F). Hence, heme b: chl a was lowest in the SML of the Irminger Basin (SML: median = 0.20 mmol mol−1, n = 15) and highest in the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (SML: median = 12.7 mmol mol−1, n = 28) suggesting community driven differences in photoacclimation and/or hemoprotein regulation patterns.

Identification of heme b based criteria for iron limited phytoplankton

In laboratory studies, values of heme b:POC below 0.10 μmol mol−1 were indicative of iron-limited phytoplankton15,16, and similar values have been determined for field phytoplankton communities in the iron - limited post-bloom Iceland Basin35 and low-iron Southern Ocean16,35. In case of Irminger Basin, Louropoulou et al.36 showed heme b depletion (median = 0.53 pmol L−1, n = 17) in a large diatom-dominated community in May-June 2014 despite relatively high iron concentrations (≥0.30 nmol L−1), indicating iron limitation resulting from the high iron requirements of the extant phytoplankton population.

In this study, we report a similar pattern of low heme b concentrations (<1 pmol L−1) and low heme b:POC ratios (<0.1 μmol mol−1) in the eastern and in the central Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre, which point to iron-limited phytoplankton communities in these areas. Our observations are confirmed by bioassay experiments that showed the eastern boundary of the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre was nitrate-iron co-limited during the period of the cruise45. The good agreement between the heme b measurements and the bioassay experiments of Browning, et al.45 reinforces previous comparisons with other approaches for mapping iron-limited phytoplankton communities36 that included the dissolved iron:nitrate ratio56, modified Si* tracer5759 and satellite-derived quantum yield of fluorescence Φsat60,61. Heme b measurements thus appeared to successfully map iron limited phytoplankton by depicting the momentary condition of the phytoplankton cells in situ.

We constructed a histogram of all our SML heme b:POC data in order to investigate overall trends in Atlantic Ocean phytoplankton populations. The distribution of the heme b:POC data (Supplementary Fig. S3A) was skewed to the right with a median value of 0.44 μmol mol−1 (n = 468) and a mean value of 0.47 ± 0.42 μmol mol−1 (n = 468). Furthermore, both the Irminger Basin and the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre exhibited an exponential distribution and their medians (0.03 μmol mol−1 and 0.09 μmol mol−1 respectively) deviated from the median of the distribution (Supplementary Fig. S3A). Taking into account laboratory studies and field observations of heme b: POC ratios and their relationship to iron limitation, we suggest that 0.10 µmol mol−1 is a reasonable estimate for defining an anemic, iron limited phytoplankton community in the Atlantic Ocean. Hence, the data appearing in the left tail (break 0.10 μmol mol−1, n = 50) (Supplementary Fig. S3A) of the distribution point to iron limited phytoplankton communities. Thus, by this definition, the southern stations of Tropical South Atlantic were iron limited and iron (co-)limitation is predicted to extend to the central parts of the subtropical gyre (Fig. 2, cruise M124, sampling February-March 2016).

In contrast, the western boundaries of the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre were characterized by slightly higher heme concentrations (1.36 pmol L−1) and heme b:POC ratios (0.37 μmol mol−1) compared to the eastern and central Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre. These results suggest that this area was not iron limited; indeed Rijkenberg, et al.38 reported iron concentrations up to 6.1 nM in the upper 800 m off shore of Brazil in the Subtropical Shelf Front (STSF), which is formed by the southward flowing Brazil Current and the norward flowing Malvinas Current62. The iron enrichment was attributed to aeolian deposition and transport by the STSF, and to offshore export of iron from Brazilian shelf waters and the Rio de la Plata river38,62.

The heme b:POC values of the open ocean stations in the Tropical North Atlantic, (SML; median = 0.26 μmol mol−1) do not point towards iron-limited phytoplankton communities, even though heme b concentrations were low (SML; median = 0.59 pmol L−1); we attribute this trend to low biomass at the time of sampling. In general, the location of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) defines the dust derived iron supply to surface waters49 and thus influences the biogeochemical status and bloom progression between the northern and the southern oligotrophic waters around the Equator63,64. In February-March 2011, when sampling was performed, Schlosser, et al.63 reported that the ITCZ was at ∼1°N and the Tropical North Atlantic was receiving significant amounts of atmospheric deposition whilst the Tropical South Atlantic had low atmospheric dust concentrations. In addition, Snow, et al.64 reported increased nitrogen fixation rates due to the abundance of Trichodesmium sp. between 15°N and 7°S which have high iron requirements relative to non-nitrogen fixing phytoplankton.

Heme b regulation strategies?

Similar to the heme b:POC ratio, the distribution of the population for the heme b:chl a ratio (Supplementary Fig. S3B) was also skewed to the right with median value of 7.77 mmol mol−1 and a mean value 8.98 mmol mol−1 (n = 491). However, we observed a contrasting behaviour in the ratios of the two iron limited areas Irminger Basin (medianSML = 0.20 mmol mol−1, n = 20) and Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre (medianSML = 12.7 mmol mol−1, n = 28), despite the similar trend in heme b:POC. The medians of heme b:chl a for these two areas deviated from the overall median of the distribution and located either on left (Irminger Basin) or the right (Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre) tail. Heme b exhibited the same trend for the two areas which implies that changes in chl a quotas drove the differences in the ratio. Hence, we ascribed this contrast to different extant phytoplankton groups, to different photoacclimation and nutrient status.

The low heme b:chl a observed in Irminger Basin implied that the heme b containing proteins of the photosynthetic apparatus decreased whilst chl a was conserved. In culture, several diatoms and prymnesiophytes exhibited decreased heme b:chl a ratio under low iron conditions (<0.50 nmol L−1)15,16 implying allocation of iron away from the hemoprotein pool16. This behaviour was considered an adaptation strategy of phytoplankton that would allow a reduction of the overall iron requirements and a more efficient utilization of the available iron in order to sustain growth16. Here, this pattern was also observed in the field in the Irminger Basin (GEOVIDE, May-June 2014) for diatom populations that likely employed heme b regulation36 in order to adapt to declining iron concentrations during bloom progression. For example, allocating the iron away from the hemoproteins would lead to decline of the heme b-containing cytochromes b6f and b559 of the PSII apparatus8,18,28, which in turn would be accompanied by increases in the chl a:PSII ratios. Indeed this was observed by Macey, et al.65 in the post-bloom iron-limited Iceland Basin. Particularly for the eukaryotes, another strategy of reducing iron requirements is switching from nitrate to ammonium utilization6668 which induces the reduction of heme b-containing nitrate reductase.

We observed very high heme b:chl a in the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre which was driven by low concentrations of chl a in the area (SML median = 0.03 nmol L−1). Furthermore, the ratio chl a:POC was 7.68 μmol mol−1 (n = 32) in that region pointing to lower photoacclimation of the dominant phytoplankton groups. At the time of the study, haptophytes and the picophytoplankton species Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus were most dominant in the eastern parts of the gyre45. Similar community composition characterizes the Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre69. Therefore, we made a comparison of the trends in chl a:POC between these two regions; in the Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre, the chl a:POC was higher compared to the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre reaching a median value of 65.0 μmol mol−1 (n = 312). The contrasting behaviour in chl a:POC can be ascribed to differences in light climate, which is known to strongly influence chl a:POC ratios70. Higher light conditions in the Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre in comparison to the Subtropical North Atlantic Gyre, as a result of both higher incident irradiance during winter months71 and shallower mixed layers (Supplementary Fig. S1), would be expected to result in the lower chlorophyll-to-carbon ratios observed. However, the low chl a concentrations, and thus the low chl a:POC values, could also be a result of general nutrient limitation in the area as shown previously72,73. Hence, our results implied a high variability in chl a due to a combination of photoacclimation, nutrient limitation, phytoplankton physiology and species specific modifications in the photosynthetic apparatus.

Our heme b data from the field appear to be broadly consistent with laboratory studies in terms of magnitude and relationship with POC. Nevertheless, a key challenge in the interpretation of relationships between heme b, chl a and POC is distinguishing between variability resulting from physiological responses to changes in light and nutrient regimes, and variability resulting from changes in the relative contributions of different carbon (C) pools35. The relationship between biomass and POC is also critical to the interpretation of optical parameters measured from space. Studies of interrelationships between chl a, POC and phytoplankton biomass in the Atlantic Ocean have concluded that chl a:POC ratios vary to a greater extent than C biomass:POC70,74, with the greater variability in chl a:POC attributed to changes in phytoplankton photophysiology driven by nutrient and light regimes. Thus in analogy, we have assumed throughout our discussion that variability between heme b, chl a and POC reported here will be more strongly influenced by physiological changes than by changes in POC composition. Further support for this assumption, or alternative methods of assessing phytoplankton biomass would be useful in future applications of heme b as an indicator of iron status in the field.

Comparison of field heme b concentrations with model-based predictions

Both theoretical estimates and direct measurements suggest heme b represents an important amount of the total cellular iron pool in phytoplankton (mean 18 ± 14%)14,15,75 thus the second part of our study aimed to examine to what extent the heme b field data were comparable to heme b estimated from the biogenic iron pool as predicted from a global biogeochemical model. Here we used the PISCES-v2 (Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies volume 2) biogeochemical model to estimate the biogenic iron pool which is determined based on Michaelis Menten uptake kinetics, further regulated by a maximum iron-to-carbon (Fe:C) cellular quota and enhanced iron uptake under iron limitation7678. Figure 5A illustrates the biogenic iron (Febio) pool from the model which corresponds to sum of the diatom and nanophytoplankton iron pools extracted at the same geographic position and month as the field data. Values represent the monthly means for the upper most layer of the model (depth 10 m) and ranged from 9.20 to 285 pmol L−1 (median = 78.8 pmol L−1, n = 254). Although a direct comparison of the absolute values is questionable due to the large uncertainties associated with model predictions of the ocean iron cycle79, there are similar trends between the Febio and heme b abundance in the Atlantic Ocean. In particular, both parameters were highest in the subpolar North Atlantic (Labrador Sea, Iceland Basin), along the continental margins (Celtic Sea, Angola Current) and in the upwelling areas (Coastal Tropical North Atlantic, Benguela Current), whilst the lowest values were determined in the oligotrophic Subtropical South Atlantic Gyre.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Model-based estimation the biogenic iron (Febio) pool deriving from the sum of the nanophytoplankton and diatom iron pools in pmol L−1. Colours represent the monthly mean values for the upper most layer of the model calculated for the same time as sampling (depth 10 m). (B) Actual field heme b measurements and predicted heme b concentrations calculated from the total Febio concentrations in the surface mixed layer (SML) of each station. Calculations follow three scenarios (1%, 18%, and 40%) representing the heme b proportion relative to the total Febio according to observations in cultured phytoplankton15. Plot A was produced using Ocean Data View99 v.4.7.9 (Schlitzer, R. 2018, https://odv.awi.de/). Plot B was produced using R statistical software97 v.1.0.136 (R core team, 2016, https://www.R-project.org).

According to phytoplankton culture experiments with different phytoplankton species, heme b accounts for between 1 and 40% of the particulate Fe (PFe) (averaging 18 ± 14%)14,15,80. We calculated the predicted heme b concentrations (in pmol L−1) from the modelled Febio of each station in the SML using three scenarios (values) 1%, 18% and 40% that represent the range and mean of heme b:PFe observed in laboratory cultures. We used the formula heme b = [Febio * [heme b ⁄ PFe] lab]/100, where [heme b / PFe]lab denotes the proportion of heme b relative to PFe determined for cultured phytoplankton under various growing conditions.

Predicted heme b concentrations were lowest for the 1% scenario and highest for the 40% scenario (Fig. 5B) with the 1% scenario corresponding more closely to the field observations reported in this study. This trend was further supported by the ratio heme b:Febio calculated from the mean heme b concentrations (in the SML) and the model-based Febio which ranged from 0.17% to 9.1% (median = 1.8%, n = 234). Taken together with heme b:POC, these results suggest that, as far as heme b is concerned, field populations were comparable to laboratory observations for species with low heme b content. Furthermore, the ratio of 1% was determined in cultures where iron (0.50 nmol L−1) or nitrate supply had been exhausted, thus perhaps better representing the natural environment. Therefore, the model prediction of Febio and the in situ heme b concentrations were consistent with previous laboratory observations15,16. The differences in the proportion of heme b relative to Febio likely arose because of the microbial community composition of each region and the interspecific differences in hemoprotein processes.

Biogenic iron and iron-to-carbon (Fe:C) ratios are critical for linking the iron and carbon cycles in the ocean and constraining phytoplankton iron requirements within biogeochemical models81. Currently, the biogenic iron pool can be assessed by radioisotope uptake experiments81,82, single-cell synchrotron x-ray fluorescence81,83,84 and determination of particulate iron after careful removal of or correction for lithogenic iron81,8587. Whilst all these techniques provide complimentary and useful information on particulate iron, single cell iron-to-phosphorus ratios or community wide Fe:C uptake rates, none provide a definitive estimate of average in-situ biogenic iron quotas within phytoplankton populations. Furthermore, none of the above methods were applied consistently on larger scale field expeditions. The good agreement of heme b observational and model-based data suggests that heme b could potentially serve as an indicator of the biogenic iron for field studies and provide an assessment of the proportion of iron used in the heme b and the hemoprotein pools in marine phytoplankton, although further comparison of heme b abundance with established methods of assessing biogenic iron are required.

Conclusions

In this study, we suggest that the ratio heme b:POC can serve as a reliable indicator of iron limitation since it appeared not to be influenced by species- specific processes which potentially involve modifications in the hemoprotein and/or other protein pools. A comparison of the heme b method with already established protocols, such as bioassay experiments43,56,88 and iron-stress biomarkers (e.g. flavodoxin, ferredoxin and IdiA)25,31,34,89,90, would validate this simple method for mapping iron limited phytoplankton in small or large scale field expeditions. Although determination of heme b in marine particulate material requires specialist analytical instruments, sample collection is straightforward and utilises the same approaches routinely applied for collection of pigment samples. Importantly, sampling for heme b does not require trace metal clean conditions, significantly widening the potential for assessment of iron limitation in the field. Furthermore, heme b is a ubiquitous biomolecule and is thus not dependent on the presence of particular phytoplankton species.

The variability of the heme b to biomass ratios suggested that phytoplankton 1) employ diverse mechanisms to utilize the available iron in the hemoprotein pool, and 2) are able to regulate the hemoproteins under iron limiting conditions. Expanding the field and laboratory research in hemoprotein abundance and cycling would contribute to the identification of such iron utilization and regulation strategies. One aspect could be the transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of biomolecules involved in the heme b cycling pathways. These include the proteins associated with the utilization of the heme b cofactor, such as the components of the photosynthetic or nitrate assimilation apparatus, as well as the components of the biosynthesis and breakdown pathways. The information about iron-utilization in hemoproteins and about regulation of the hemoprotein pool would shed light on the molecular response and adaptation of phytoplankton to iron limitation. This information will be particularly useful in the future due to projected alterations in desert dust supply49,91 and thus, to iron availability in the ocean, with potential impacts on carbon sequestration and climate. Finally, application of the heme b method in oceanic regions other than the Atlantic Ocean would enhance the estimates of the magnitude of the biogenic iron pool and expand our knowledge on phytoplankton physiological status in relation to iron.

Methods

Sampling

During all research cruises sampling of seawater was performed by a stainless steel CTD rosette equipped with Niskin bottles for the determination of heme b, POC and chl a. We sampled 279 stations and 4 to 6 different depths per station (typically down to 300 m deep) in order to study heme b abundance in the Atlantic Ocean.

Heme b

Marine particulate material (>0.7 μm) was collected after filtration of seawater on glass fiber filters (GF/F, pore size 0.7 μm, MF300, Fisherbrand) for the determination of heme b. The filters were stored at −80 °C prior to analysis. Heme b was quantified by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) – Diode Array Detection (DAD) – Electrospray Ionisation (ESI) Mass spectrometry (MS) after extraction by 2.5% w-v Octyl β-D-glucopyranoside-OGP solution (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥98% GC Grade)80,92. Regarding the analytical procedure and the instruments used, we followed the protocol described by Gledhill (2007) for the samples from the CD173 cruise and Gledhill (2014) for the samples from cruises D346, D361 and M124. Good agreement was obtained between the two analytical methods92. Slight modifications were applied to the analysis of the samples from GEOVIDE and M121 as described in Louropoulou et al.36.

Quantification of heme b for D346, D361, GEOVIDE, M121 and M124 was performed from the MS data on a m/z ratio of 616.122, since the PDA detector is known to have interferences from other pigments co-eluting with heme b and absorbing at a wavelength of 401 nm92. The analytical detection limits were defined as three times the standard deviation of the lowest calibration standard for each of the methods followed and were 1.57 nM (CD173), 190 pmol heme b L−1 (D346, D361 and M124) and 32 pmol heme b L−1 (GEOVIDE and M121). Heme b could not be detected in the blank extraction solution in either utilised method.

Particulate organic carbon and chlorophyll a

Seawater was filtered through pre-combusted GF/F for the determination of POC and acidified either with sulphurous acid - H2SO3 (cruises D346, D361, M121, M124) or with hydrochloric acid - HCl (GEOVIDE) for the removal of inorganic carbon following published protocols93,94. POC in samples and several blank filters was quantified by elemental NC analyser using acetanilide as the calibration standard93.

Chlorophyll a was determined for the cruises CD173, D346, D361 and M124 via fluorometry after extraction with 90% (v:v) acetone in the dark95. For the GEOVIDE and M121 cruises, chlorophyll a was determined after extraction with 100% methanol and sonication followed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography quantification96.

Data handling

Data processing, statistical analysis and visualization were carried out using R Statistical Software97 (R Core Team 2016, https://www.R-project.org). The SML was calculated from the CTD data (obtained by sensors on the rosettes) using the temperature-based criterion (ΔT = 0.5 °C)98. We checked the normality of the data distribution by applying the Shapiro-Wilk test which showed a non-normal distribution for all parameters (p < 0.05). Hence, we used the Kruskal–Wallis test for analysis of variance, the Wilcoxon rank sum test to identify differences in the distributions in and below the SML and the Spearman’s rank correlation to check the association between parameters. Surface and section plots were produced using the Ocean Data View99 v.4.7.9 (Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. 2018).

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the ship crews, PIs and scientists of all research expeditions (GEOVIDE, CD173, D346, D361, M121 and M124). We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Tim de Groot in sampling procedures during the M124 expedition. This project was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NE/K001973/1, NE/G015732/1, NE/H00475/1). The cruise in the SE Atlantic Ocean (M121) was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). A.T. was funded by the European Research Council (grant #724289). T.B. received funding from a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral European Fellowship (OceanLiNES; project ID 658035). E.L. was financially supported by the Helmholtz Research School for Ocean System Science and Technology (HOSST).

Author contributions

E.L. and M.G. designed the research. E.L., T.B. and D.H. collected and analysed samples. E.L. performed data processing, statistical analyses and created the figures for the manuscript. A.T. provided the modelled data. M.G., R.S., E.A. supervised the study and contributed to the interpretation of the results. E.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Data availability

Heme b and supporting data are available on the British Oceanographic Data Centre, http://www.bodc.ac.uk/.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-61425-0.

References

  • 1.Sunda WG, Price NM, Morel FMM. Trace metal ion buffers and their use in culture studies. Algal Cult. Tech. 2005;4:35–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morel FMM, Price NM. The Biogeochemical Cycles of Trace Metals. Science (80-.). 2003;300:944–947. doi: 10.1126/science.1083545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Geider RJ, La Roche J. The role of iron in phytoplankton photosynthesis, and the potential for iron-limitation of primary productivity in the sea. Photosynth. Res. 1994;39:275–301. doi: 10.1007/BF00014588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.da Silva, J. J. R. F. & Williams, R. J. P. The Biological Chemistry of the Elements: The Inorganic Chemistry of Life. (OUP Oxford, 2001).
  • 5.Chapman, S. K., Daff, S. & Munro, A. W. Heme: The most versatile redox centre in biology? in Metal Sites in Proteins and Models: Iron Centres (eds. Hill, H. A. O., Sadler, P. J. & Thomson, A. J.) 39–70, 10.1007/3-540-62870-3_2 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997).
  • 6.Espinas NA, Kobayashi K, Takahashi S, Mochizuki N, Masuda T. Evaluation of Unbound Free Heme in Plant Cells by Differential Acetone Extraction. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:1344–1354. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mochizuki N, et al. The cell biology of tetrapyrroles: a life and death struggle. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:488–498. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hogle SLS, Barbeau KA, Gledhill M. Heme in the marine environment: from cells to the iron cycle. Metallomics. 2014;6:1107–1120. doi: 10.1039/C4MT00031E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roe KL, Hogle SL, Barbeau KA. Utilization of heme as an iron source by marine alphaproteobacteria in the roseobacter clade. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:5753–5762. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01562-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hogle SL, Thrash JC, Dupont CL, Barbeau KA. Trace Metal Acquisition by Marine Heterotrophic Bacterioplankton with Contrasting Trophic Strategies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:1613 LP–1624. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03128-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hopkinson BM, Roe KL, Barbeau KA. Heme uptake by Microscilla marina and evidence for heme uptake systems in the genomes of diverse marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:6263–6270. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00964-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beale SI. Biosynthesis of Phycobilins. Chem. Rev. 1993;93:785–802. doi: 10.1021/cr00018a008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cornejo J, Beale SI. Phycobilin biosynthetic reactions in extracts of cyanobacteria. Photosynth. Res. 1997;51:223–230. doi: 10.1023/A:1005855010560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raven JA. Predictions of Mn and Fe use efficiencies of phototrophic growth as a function of light availability for growth and of C assimilation pathway. New Phytol. 1990;116:1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00505.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Honey DJ, et al. Heme b in marine phytoplankton and particulate material from the North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013;483:1–17. doi: 10.3354/meps10367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gledhill M, Gerringa LJA, Laan P, Timmermans KR. Heme b quotas are low in Southern Ocean phytoplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2015;532:29–40. doi: 10.3354/meps11345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chappell PD, Moffett JW, Hynes AM, Webb EA. Molecular evidence of iron limitation and availability in the global diazotroph Trichodesmium. ISME J. 2012;6:1728–1739. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Greene RM, Geider RJ, Kolber Z, Falkowski PG. Iron-Induced Changes in Light Harvesting and Photochemical Energy Conversion Processes in Eukaryotic Marine Algae. Plant Physiol. 1992;100:565–575. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.2.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.King AL, Barbeau K. Evidence for phytoplankton iron limitation in the southern California Current System. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2007;342:91–103. doi: 10.3354/meps342091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kolber ZS, et al. Iron limitation of phytoplankton photosynthesis in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature. 1994;371:145. doi: 10.1038/371145a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shi T, Sun Y, Falkowski PG. Effects of iron limitation on the expression of metabolic genes in the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;9:2945–2956. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sunda WG, Huntsman SA. Interrelated influence of iron, light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth. Nature. 1997;390:389–392. doi: 10.1038/37093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bibby TS, Nield J, Barber J. Iron deficiency induces the formation of an antenna ring around trimeric photosystem I in cyanobacteria. Nature. 2001;412:743. doi: 10.1038/35089098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Richier, S. et al. Abundances of iron-binding photosynthetic and nitrogen-fixing proteins of Trichodesmium both in culture and in situ from the North Atlantic. PLoS One7, Richier, S., Macey, A. I., Pratt, N. J., Honey, D. (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Allen AE, et al. Whole-cell response of the pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to iron starvation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008;105:10438–10443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711370105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marchetti A, Cassar N. Diatom elemental and morphological changes in response to iron limitation: A brief review with potential paleoceanographic applications. Geobiology. 2009;7:419–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saito MA, et al. Iron conservation by reduction of metalloenzyme inventories in the marine diazotroph Crocosphaera watsonii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:2184–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006943108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Strzepek RF, Harrison PJ. Photosynthetic architecture differs in coastal and oceanic diatoms. Nature. 2004;431:689–692. doi: 10.1038/nature02954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schorsch M, et al. A unique ferredoxin acts as a player in the low-iron response of photosynthetic organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:E12111–E12120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810379115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peers G, Price NM. Copper-containing plastocyanin used for electron transport by an oceanic diatom. Nature. 2006;441:341–344. doi: 10.1038/nature04630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.LaRoche J, Boyd PW, McKay RML, Geider RJ. Flavodoxin as an in situ marker for iron stress in phytoplankton. Nature. 1996;382:802. doi: 10.1038/382802a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Erdner DL, Anderson DM. Ferredoxin and flavodoxin as biochemical indicators of iron limitation during open-ocean iron enrichment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1999;44:1609–1615. doi: 10.4319/lo.1999.44.7.1609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pankowski A, Mcminn A. Iron availability regulates growth, photosynthesis, and production of ferredoxin and flavodoxin in Antarctic sea ice diatoms. Aquat. Biol. 2008;4:273–288. doi: 10.3354/ab00116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saito MA, et al. Multiple nutrient stresses at intersecting Pacific Ocean biomes detected by protein biomarkers. Science (80-.). 2014;345:1173–1177. doi: 10.1126/science.1256450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gledhill M, Achterberg EP, Honey DJ, Nielsdottir MC, Rijkenberg MJA. Distributions of particulate Heme b in the Atlantic and Southern Oceans - Implications for electron transport in phytoplankton. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2013;27:1072–1082. doi: 10.1002/2013GB004639. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Louropoulou, E. et al. Regulation of the Phytoplankton Heme b Iron Pool During the North Atlantic Spring Bloom. Front. Microbiol. 10 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Ryan-Keogh TJ, et al. Spatial and temporal development of phytoplankton iron stress in relation to bloom dynamics in the high-latitude North Atlantic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2013;58:533–545. doi: 10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0533. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rijkenberg MJA, et al. The Distribution of Dissolved Iron in the West Atlantic Ocean. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boyd PW, Ellwood MJ. The biogeochemical cycle of iron in the ocean. Nat. Geosci. 2010;3:675–682. doi: 10.1038/ngeo964. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mills MM, Ridame C, Davey M, La Roche J, Geider RJ. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature. 2004;429:292–294. doi: 10.1038/nature02550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moore CM, et al. Large-scale distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability. Nat. Geosci. 2009;2:867–871. doi: 10.1038/ngeo667. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moore CM, et al. Iron limits primary productivity during spring bloom development in the central North Atlantic. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006;12:626–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01122.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Browning TJ, et al. Nutrient regimes control phytoplankton ecophysiology in the South Atlantic. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:463–479. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-463-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Browning TJ, et al. Iron limitation of microbial phosphorus acquisition in the tropical North Atlantic. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15465. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Browning TJ, et al. Nutrient co-limitation at the boundary of an oceanic gyre. Nature. 2017;551:242–246. doi: 10.1038/nature24063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pabortsava K, et al. Carbon sequestration in the deep Atlantic enhanced by Saharan dust. Nat. Geosci. 2017;10:189–194. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sanders R, et al. The Biological Carbon Pump in the North Atlantic. Prog. Oceanogr. 2014;129:200–218. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Falkowski P, et al. The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System. Science (80-.). 2011;291:290–296. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5490.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jickells TD, et al. Global Iron Connections Between Desert Dust, Ocean Biogeochemistry, and Climate. Science (80-.). 2005;308:67–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1105959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Honey, D. J. Heme b in marine cyanobacteria and the (sub-) tropical North Atlantic. (University of Southampton, 2012).
  • 51.Rees A, et al. 20 Years of the Atlantic Meridional Transect-AMT. Limnol. Oceanogr. Bull. 2015;24:101–107. doi: 10.1002/lob.10069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Poulton AJ, et al. Phytoplankton carbon fixation, chlorophyll-biomass and diagnostic pigments in the Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2006;53:1593–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rasse, R. et al. Evaluating Optical Proxies of Particulate Organic Carbon across the Surface Atlantic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 4 (2017).
  • 54.Hickman AE, et al. Distribution and chromatic adaptation of phytoplankton within a shelf sea thermocline. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2009;54:525–536. doi: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.2.0525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hickman AE, et al. Primary production and nitrate uptake within the seasonal thermocline of a stratified shelf sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012;463:39–57. doi: 10.3354/meps09836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nielsdóttir MC, Moore CM, Sanders R, Hinz DJ, Achterberg EP. Iron limitation of the postbloom phytoplankton communities in the Iceland Basin. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2009;23:1–13. doi: 10.1029/2008GB003410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sarmiento JL, Gruber N, Brzezinski A, Dunne JP. High latitude controls of thermohaline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature. 2003;427:56–60. doi: 10.1038/nature02127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brzezinski MA, et al. Enhanced silica ballasting from iron stress sustains carbon export in a frontal zone within the California. Current. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2015;120:4654–4669. doi: 10.1002/2015JC010829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hogle SL, et al. Pervasive iron limitation at subsurface chlorophyll maxima of the California. Current. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:13300–13305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813192115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Behrenfeld MJ, et al. Satellite-detected fluorescence reveals global physiology of ocean phytoplankton. Biogeosciences. 2009;6:779–794. doi: 10.5194/bg-6-779-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Browning TJ, Bouman HA, Moore MC. Satellite-detected fluorescence: decouplingnonphotochemical quenching from ironstress signals in the South Atlantic and Southern Ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2014;28:510–524. doi: 10.1002/2013GB004773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Piola AR, Möller OO, Guerrero RA, Campos EJD. Variability of the subtropical shelf front off eastern South America: Winter 2003 and summer 2004. Cont. Shelf Res. 2008;28:1639–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2008.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schlosser C, et al. Seasonal ITCZ migration dynamically controls the location of the (sub)tropical Atlantic biogeochemical divide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:1438–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318670111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Snow JT, et al. Environmental controls on the biogeography of diazotrophy and Trichodesmium in the Atlantic Ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2015;29:865–884. doi: 10.1002/2015GB005090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Macey AI, Ryan-Keogh T, Richier S, Moore CM, Bibby TS. Photosynthetic protein stoichiometry and photophysiology in the high latitude north atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2014;59:1853–1864. doi: 10.4319/lo.2014.59.6.1853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Price NM, Andersen LF, Morel FMM. Iron and nitrogen nutrition of equatorial Pacific plankton. Deep Sea Res. Part A, Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1991;38:1361–1378. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(91)90011-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Timmermans KR, Stolte W, de Baar HJW. Iron-mediated effects on nitrate reductase in marine phytoplankton. Mar. Biol. 1994;121:389–396. doi: 10.1007/BF00346749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cohen NR, et al. Diatom Transcriptional and Physiological Responses to Changes in Iron Bioavailability across Ocean Provinces. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017;4:360. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zubkov MV, Sleigh MA, Tarran GA, Burkill PH, Leakey RJ. Picoplanktonic community structure on an Atlantic transect from 50°N to 50°S. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1998;45:1339–1355. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Behrenfeld MJ, Boss E, Siegel DA, Shea DM. Carbon-based ocean productivity and phytoplankton physiology from space. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2005;19:1–14. doi: 10.1029/2004GB002299. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bouvet M, Hoepffner N, Dowell MD. Parameterization of a spectral solar irradiance model for the global ocean using multiple satellite sensors. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2002;107:8–18. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Arteaga L, Pahlow M, Oschlies A. Modeled Chl:C ratio and derived estimates of phytoplankton carbon biomass and its contribution to total particulate organic carbon in the global surface ocean. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2016;30:1791–1810. doi: 10.1002/2016GB005458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Geider RJ. Light and temperature dependence of the carbon to chlorophyll a ratio in microalgae and cyanobacteria: implications for physiology and growth of phytoplankton. New Phytol. 1987;106:1–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04788.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Graff JR, et al. Analytical phytoplankton carbon measurements spanning diverse ecosystems. Deep. Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2015;102:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2015.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Raven JA. The iron and molybdenum use efficiencies of plant growth with different energy, carbon and nitrogen sources. New Phytol. 1988;109:279–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04196.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tagliabue A, Resing J. Impact of hydrothermalism on the ocean iron cycle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016;374:20150291. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tagliabue A, et al. The Role of External Inputs and Internal Cycling in Shaping the Global Ocean Cobalt Distribution: Insights From the First Cobalt Biogeochemical Model. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2018;32:594–616. doi: 10.1002/2017GB005830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Aumont O, Ethé C, Tagliabue A, Bopp L, Gehlen M. PISCES-v2: An ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies. Geosci. Model Dev. 2015;8:2465–2513. doi: 10.5194/gmd-8-2465-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tagliabue A, et al. How well do global ocean biogeochemistry models simulate dissolved iron distributions? Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2016;30:149–174. doi: 10.1002/2015GB005289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gledhill M. The determination of heme b in marine phyto- and bacterioplankton. Mar. Chem. 2007;103:393–403. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2006.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.King AL, et al. A comparison of biogenic iron quotas during a diatom spring bloom using multiple approaches. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:667–687. doi: 10.5194/bg-9-667-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bowie AR, et al. Topical Studies in Oceanography: The fate of added iron during a mesoscale fertilisation experiment in the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 2008;48:2703–2743. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00015-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Twining BS, Baines SB. The Trace Metal Composition of Marine Phytoplankton. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2013;5:191–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lampe RH, et al. Different iron storage strategies among bloom-forming diatoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:E12275–E12284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805243115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sarthou G, et al. The fate of biogenic iron during a phytoplankton bloom induced by natural fertilisation: Impact of copepod grazing. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2008;55:734–751. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.12.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chever F, Sarthou G, Bucciarelli E, Blain S, Bowie AR. An iron budget during the natural iron fertilisation experiment KEOPS (Kerguelen Islands, Southern Ocean) Biogeosciences. 2010;7:455–468. doi: 10.5194/bg-7-455-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bowie AR, et al. Biogeochemical iron budgets of the Southern Ocean south of Australia: Decoupling of iron and nutrient cycles in the subantarctic zone by the summertime supply. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 2009;23:1–14. doi: 10.1029/2009GB003500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Moore CM, et al. Relative influence of nitrogen and phosphorus availability on phytoplankton physiology and productivity in the oligotrophic sub-tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008;53:291–305. doi: 10.4319/lo.2008.53.1.0291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Pankowski A, McMinn A. Development of immunoassays for the iron-regulated proteins ferredoxin and flavodoxin in polar microalgae. J. Phycol. 2009;45:771–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00687.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Webb EA, Moffett JW, Waterbury JB. Iron Stress in Open-Ocean Cyanobacteria (Synechococcus, Trichodesmium, and Crocosphaera spp.): Identification of the IdiA Protein. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:5444–5452. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5444-5452.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mahowald NM, et al. Atmospheric Iron Deposition: Global Distribution, Variability, and Human Perturbations. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2009;1:245–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gledhill M. The detection of iron protoporphyrin (heme b) in phytoplankton and marine particulate material by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry - comparison with diode array detection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2014;841:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Verardo DJ, Froelich PN, McIntyre A. Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the Carlo Erba NA-1500 analyzer. Deep Sea Res. Part A. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 1990;37:157–165. doi: 10.1016/0198-0149(90)90034-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lorrain A, Savoye N, Chauvaud L, Paulet Y-M, Naulet N. Decarbonation and preservation method for the analysis of organic C and N contents and stable isotope ratios of low-carbonated suspended particulate material. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2003;491:125–133. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00815-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Welschmeyer NA. Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1994;39:1985–1992. doi: 10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1985. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ras J, et al. Spatial variability of phytoplankton pigment distributions in the Subtropical South Pacific Ocean: comparison between in situ and predicted data. Biogeosciences. 2008;5:353–369. doi: 10.5194/bg-5-353-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org (2016).
  • 98.Monterey, G. I. & Levitus, S. Seasonal variability of Mixed Layer Depth for the World Ocean. NOAA Atlas, NESDIS 14 (U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1997).
  • 99.Schlitzer, R., Ocean Data View, http://odv.awi.de (2016).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Heme b and supporting data are available on the British Oceanographic Data Centre, http://www.bodc.ac.uk/.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES