Skip to main content
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences logoLink to Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):7–13. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0094

Evaluation of the Knees of Asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers with MR Imaging

Barış Polat 1,*, Deniz Aydın 2, Ayşe Esin Polat 3, Tahsin Gürpınar 4, Ramadan Özmanevra 1, Mehmet Alp Dirik 5
PMCID: PMC7067911  PMID: 30700660

Abstract

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of pathologic findings in asymptomatic knees of Kangoo Jumpers by using a 3T MRI and to compare them with age and sex-matched controls who do not regularly participate in any impact sports.

Methods:

Both knees of 18 Kangoo Jumpers were examined by 3T MRIs in a total of 36 MRI scans. The control group was comprised of 20 volunteers from the same age group and with similar weights who did not participate in any competitive sports, in a total of 40 MRI scans. Two orthopedists and one radiologist independently assessed all images for the presence or absence of any abnormalities.

Results:

In 32 (88.9%) of the 36 Kangoo Jumpers’ knees, one or more abnormalities were observed. The most prevalent abnormality was bone marrow edema, which was detected in 32 knees (88.9%). The other significant findings were quadriceps tendinopathy (80.6%), patellar tendinopathy (63.9%), gastrocnemius tendinopathy (63.9%), infrapatellar fat pad edema (75%), suprapatellar fat pad edema (63.9%), meniscal signal change (72.2%) and cartilage damage in the patellofemoral joint (72.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of joint effusion (8.3%), ganglion cysts (8.3%) or tibiofemoral joint cartilage injury (0%).

Conclusion:

This study reveals many types of knee MRI findings of asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers compared to the control group. These MRI findings may be associated with acute knee injuries or chronic joint problems such as osteoarthritis, which may develop in long-term follow-up studies.

Keywords: bone marrow edema, Kangoo Jump, knee, magnetic resonance imaging

Introduction

Kangoo Jump (Kangoo Jumps, Sion, Switzerland) is a sport involving jumping that is performed with specially designed rebound shoes. Kangoo Jump is becoming increasingly popular and it can be used for jogging, athletic training, sports strengthening, and conditioning. The benefits of this sport include reduced body fat, tightening and strengthening muscles, increased agility and it provides aerobic exercise for the heart. Kangoo Jumps fitness programs offer an enjoyable form of physical activity to people of all ages. The rebound shoes used in Kangoo Jumps were primarily developed to reduce the impact stress on joggers’ joints.1 Their balanced impact protection system reduces the impact force to the ground by up to 80%. Conversely, jogging or jumping intensively with kangoo rebound shoes may lead to overuse-related pain and musculoskeletal injuries.

Kangoo Jumps is recommended as an effective plyometric exercise, particularly for competitive sports. Plyometric exercises are one of the most effective ways of increasing the vertical jump, speed, and strength of an athlete. These explosive movements allow the creation of maximum force in a short amount of time. The design of the rebound shoes incorporating ankle wraps reduces the risk of ankle injury as the pronation and supination are significantly reduced.

The knee joint is the most common cause of complaints in Kangoo Jumpers in our clinical practice. One of the two Kangoo Jumpers examined in the outpatient clinic had overuse-related pain caused by generalized bone marrow edema and the other had a grade 2 medial collateral ligament tear at a different time. After these injuries, we wanted to determine the possible pathologies by using 3T MRI in asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers’ knees.

MRI is the most reliable non-invasive diagnostic technique for the assessment of musculoskeletal lesions associated with sport practice, such as bone marrow edema (BME), joint effusion, as well as cartilage, meniscal, ligament and tendon lesions.27

A range of positive MRI findings were detected in the asymptomatic knees of athletes from various sports, such as basketball, football, swimming and running.2,4,5,7 Positive radiological findings should be considered, although they are clinically asymptomatic. These imaging findings may guide the prevention of future irreversible functional disabilities. To our knowledge, there has been no such study published about the knee MRI findings of asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers. We aimed to determine the prevalence of pathologic findings in the asymptomatic knees of Kangoo Jumpers by using 3T MRI and to compare them with age and sex-matched controls who do not regularly participate in any impact sports.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This cross-sectional control study was conducted at Dr. Suat Günsel Kyrenia University Hospital between January 2018 and April 2018. We obtained ethical approval for this study from the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (Ref No: RY-2018-07). Athletes and individuals in the control group participated in the study voluntarily and signed informed consent forms. The demographic information of a total of 18 Kangoo Jumper candidates and a control group of 20 non-athletic candidates was obtained via the questionnaire designed for the study.

The inclusion criteria for the Kangoo Jumpers were: being asymptomatic related to the knees, regularly participating in a Kangoo Jumps fitness program held at a minimum frequency of three times a week for 1 hour/day and having participated in a Kangoo Jumps fitness program for at least 6 months. Exclusion criteria included previous surgery on the knee, hip or ankle; history of any traumatic injuries that led to breaks from the regularly Kangoo Jumps fitness program; osteoarticular diseases or lower limp malalignment; history of chronic disease and body mass index (BMI) > 30.

The inclusion criteria for the control group were being asymptomatic related to the knees, with a corresponding age and weight range with the athletes. The exclusion criteria were the participate in any competitive sports more than once a month in the last 6 months; history of previous surgery on the lower limb or any traumatic knee lesion that led to breaks in daily activities; osteoarticular diseases or lower limp malalignment; history of chronic disease and BMI > 30.

Ultimately, 18 Kangoo Jumper candidates and 20 non-sporting candidates were included in the study. Both knees of each participant were examined by 3T MRI, with 36 MRI scans in the Kangoo Jump group and 40 MRI scans in the control group.

Magnetic resonance imaging

All examinations were performed with a 3T MRI machine (Siemens, Magnetom, Skyra, Erlangen, Germany) and a 15-channel knee-dedicated Tx/Rx 15-channel coil. We used our standardized protocol which basically has three sequences in sagittal orientation; 1) fat-suppressed proton density weighted turbo spin-echo (FS PD TSE) sequence, (TR/TE, 3090/25), 2) T1-weighted (T1) turbo spin-echo sequence, (TR/TE, 473/12), 3) T2 fat saturated water excitation double echo steady state-3D (T2 FS 3D DESS WE) sequence, (TR/TE, 1484/504), two sequence in coronal orientation; 1) fat-suppressed proton density weighted turbo spin-echo (FS PD TSE) sequence, (TR/TE, 2640/34), 2) T2 turbo inversion recovery magnitude short tau inversion recovery (T2_TIRM_COR STIR) sequence, (TR/TE, 4560/25) and one sequence in axial orientation; 1) fat-suppressed proton density weighted turbo spin-echo (PD_TSE_FS_TRA) sequence, (TR/TE, 4150/58)]. Additionally, FS PD TSE sequence scan time 83 s. Bandwidth: 246 hz/px., T1W TSE sequence scan time 163 s. Bandwidth: 181 hz/px., T2 FS 3D DESS WE sequence scan time 241 s. Bandwidth: 222 hz/px., T2_TIRM_COR sequence scan time 96 s. Bandwidth: 246 hz/px. The parameters used for image acquisition were a 320 × 256 matrix, 19 × 17 cm dual FOV, 3.0 mm slice thickness with 0.8 mm interslice gap.

Knee MRI scans were evaluated for the presence or absence of the following findings which were described as abnormal when the following criteria were met.

  1. Fat pad edema (suprapatellar, infrapatellar): Increased signal intensity in fat-suppressed T1-weighted fast spin-echo (T1 FSE), fat-suppressed PD sequence and reduced signal intensity in T1 FSE sequences.

  2. Tendinopathy (quadriceps, patellar, gastrocnemius): Thickening or signal intensity changes in FSE, PD, and T1 FSE sequences.

  3. Meniscal injury: Increase in signal intensity in FSE, PD and T1 FSE sequences that are graded as follows: Grade I, intrasubstance, globular signal change and does not reach the superior or inferior articular surface. Grade II, intrasubstance, linear signal change and does not reach the superior or inferior joint surface. Grade III, signal change reaches the superior or inferior articular surface or both.4,6

  4. Cartilage injury (tibiofemoral, patellofemoral joint): Increase in signal intensity in FSE, PD and T1 FSE sequences that are graded as follows; Grade I, focal areas of hyperintensity with the normal contour of cartilage surface. Grade II, damage compromising <50% of the thickness of the cartilage. Grade III, damage compromising >50% of the thickness of the cartilage but not extended to the subchondral bone tissue. Grade IV exposed subchondral bone.68

  5. BME (tibiofemoral, patellofemoral, femoral longitudinal): Increased signal intensity in FSE and PD sequence; and reduced signal intensity in T1 FSE sequences. Any signal changes in the tibiofemoral or patellofemoral bone tissue were accepted as abnormal. In the sagittal sequence, greater than 1.5 mm thick signal change behind the anterior femoral cortex was considered abnormal.

  6. Joint effusion: In the suprapatellar bursa in the midsagittal sequence, a quantity of sinovial fluid volume less than 5 mm was considered absent and a volume of fluid of 5 mm or more was considered abnormal.5

  7. Ganglion cysts: Defined as present or absent in all three sequences in popliteal or parameniscal location.

Analysis of the images

A total of 76 knee MRIs were saved on a workstation for further analysis. Two orthopedists and one radiologist (BP, DA, and MAD) with 4, 6 and 8 years’ experience in musculoskeletal imaging, respectively assessed all images independently. Findings were blinded to the study groups. The examiners were blind to the group of the subject. Where there was disagreement between the examiners, a reevaluation was made until a consensus was reached.

Statistical analysis

Mean, standard deviation, median lowest, highest, frequency and ratio values were used in the descriptive statistics of the data. The distribution of the variables was measured by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Mann–Whitney test was used in the analysis of quantitative independent data. A Chi-square test was used in the analysis of qualitative independent data. SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used in the analyses. Statistical significance was considered to be present at P < 0.05. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient (κ) statistical test. The κ-value between 0.8 and 1 was considered as perfect agreement.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

The study and control groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics which are shown in Table 1. Athletes who contributed to the study were selected randomly on a voluntary basis among those who regularly attended a Kangoo Jumps fitness program 3 days a week for 1 hour/day. The mean duration of the Kangoo Jumps fitness program was 14.4 months (range: 6–60).

Table 1.

Patients demographics

Control group (n = 20) Kangoo Jumpers (n = 18) P-value


Mean ± SD, n (%) Median Mean ± SD, n (%) Median
Age (years) 28.8 ± 3.9 29.0 29.0 ± 5.0 28.5 0.825 m
Sex
  Female 16 (80.0) 15 (83.3) 0.791 χ2
  Male 4 (20.0) 3 (16.7)
Height (cm) 168.2 ± 6.4 167.5 167.5 ± 7.6 168.0 0.618 m
Weight (kg) 63.4 ± 8.8 60.5 65.2 ± 10.6 64.0 0.619 m
Body mass index 22.4 ± 3.1 21.4 23.2 ± 2.7 23.9 0.372 m

m, Mann–Whitney u-test; χ2, Chi-square test.

Abnormalities of the knees

A total of 76 knee MRIs were analyzed, including 40 (53%) candidates in the control group and 36 (47%) Kangoo Jump athletes.

In the group of Kangoo Jumpers, 32 (88.9%) of 36 knees had one or more abnormalities. The most prevalent abnormality was BME, which was detected in 32 (88.9%) knees. Based on the regions where BME was seen, three groups were separated. The most common location of BME was immediately behind the anterior femoral cortex, called femoral longitudinal BME (88.9%) (Fig. 1). The second most frequent area of BME was the patellofemoral joint which includes the patella and trochlea (66.7%). The third most common site of BME was the tibiofemoral joint which includes the femoral condyles and tibial plateaus (47.2%).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

27-year-old female asymptomatic Kangoo Jumper. Proximal asterisk shows femoral longitudinal bone marrow edema (BME), middle asterisk shows patellar BME, distal asterisk shows tibiofemoral joint BME. Arrow shows infrapatellar fat pad edema. Patellar and quadriceps tendinopathy are seen as signal change at their insertion.

The second most common finding was quadriceps tendinopathy which was detected in 29 (80.6%) knees. Both patellar and gastrocnemius tendinopathy were detected in 23 (63.9%) knees. Infrapatellar and suprapatellar fat pad edema were detected in 27 (75%) and 23 (63.9%) knees, respectively (Fig. 2). The meniscal signal change was detected in 26 (72.2%) knees. Signal change at the lateral meniscus was only detected in one knee with Grade I. Other signal changes were detected at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in 22 knees with Grade I and in 3 knees with Grade II (Fig. 3). Articular cartilage damage was investigated in two different regions: patellofemoral and tibiofemoral. Cartilage damage in the patellofemoral joint which includes the patellar and trochlea articular surface was detected in 26 (72.2%) knees (Fig. 4). This cartilage damage was classified in 20 knees as Grade I and in six knees as Grade II. Cartilage damage in the tibiofemoral joint was not detected in any athletes. Joint effusion and ganglion cysts were detected in three different patients (8.3%).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

29-year-old female asymptomatic Kangoo Jumper. Asterisk shows femoral longitudinal bone marrow edema (BME), arrow shows suprapatellar fat pad edema.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

31-year-old male asymptomatic Kangoo Jumper. (a) Arrow shows Grade I meniscal degeneration. (b) Arrow shows gastrocnemius tendinopathy.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

33-year-old female asymptomatic Kangoo Jumper. Asterisk shows tibiofemoral bone marrow edema (BME), arrow shows tip II cartilage injury in the patellofemoral joint.

In the control group, 16 (40%) of the 40 knees had one or more abnormalities. The most prevalent abnormality was infrapatellar fat pad edema which was detected in 11 (27.5%) knees. In 9 (22.5%) knees suprapatellar fat pad edema was detected, while quadriceps tendinopathy was found in 6 (15%) knees, patellar tendinopathy in 5 (12.5%) knees and gastrocnemius tendinopathy in 8 (20%) knees. BME was detected in only 4 (10%) knees. Patellofemoral joint BME was detected in 3 (7.5%) knees and tibiofemoral joint BME was detected in 2 (5%) knees. Femoral longitudinal BME was not detected in any knee and 4 (10%) knees exhibited meniscal signal changes. All of these signal changes were Grade I at the medial meniscus posterior horn. A total of 8 (20%) knees exhibited patellofemoral joint cartilage injury. All of these injuries were classified as Grade I. Tibiofemoral joint cartilage injury was not detected in any knee.

In the case group, the suprapatellar, infrapatellar fat pad edema, quadriceps, patellar, gastrocnemius tendinopathy, meniscal injury, patellofemoral joint cartilage injury, BME was significantly higher than in the control group (P < 0.05). Tibiofemoral joint cartilage injury, joint effusion and ganglion cysts in the case and control groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). Interobserver agreement (κ) was 0.83 for all assessments. The results are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Abnormalities detected in the knees of Kangoo Jumpers and controls

Control group (n = 40) Kangoo Jumpers (n = 36) P-value

Mean ± SD, n (%) Mean ± SD, n (%)
Abnormalities (one or more) (−) 24 (60) 4 (11.1) 0.000 χ2
(+) 16 (40) 32 (88.9)
Suprapatellar fat pad edema (−) 31 (77.5) 13 (36.1) 0.000 χ2
(+) 9 (22.5) 23 (63.9)
İnfrapatellar fat pad edema (−) 29 (72.5) 9 (25) 0.000 χ2
(+) 11 (27.5) 27 (75)
Quadriceps tendinopathy (−) 34 (85) 7 (19.4) 0.000 χ2
(+) 6 (15) 29 (80.6)
Patellar tendinopathy (−) 35 (87.5) 13 (36.1) 0.000 χ2
(+) 5 (12.5) 23 (63.9)
Meniscal injury (−) 36 (90) 10 (27.8) 0.000 χ2
(+) 4 (10) 26 (72.2)
Patellofemoral joint cartilage injury (−) 32 (80) 10 (27.8) 0.001 χ2
(+) 8 (20) 26 (72.2)
Tibiofemoral joint cartilage injury (−) 40 (100.0) 36 (100) 1.000 χ2
(+) 0 0
Gastrocnemius tendinopathy (−) 32 (80) 13 (36.1) 0.001 χ2
(+) 8 (20) 23 (63.9)
BME (−) 36 (90) 4 (11.1) 0.000 χ2
(+) 4 (10) 32 (88.9)
Tibiofemoral BME (−) 38 (95) 19 (52.8) 0.002 χ2
(+) 2 (5) 17 (47.2)
Patellofemoral BME (−) 37 (92.5) 12 (33.3) 0.000 χ2
(+) 3 (7.5) 24 (66.7)
Femoral longitudinal BME (−) 40 (100) 4 (11.1) 0.000 χ2
(+) 0 32 (88.9)
Joint effusion (−) 38 (95) 33 (91.7) 0.558 χ2
(+) 2 (5) 3 (8.3)
Ganglion cysts (−) 37 (92.5) 33 (91.7) 0.852 χ2
(+) 3 (15) 3 (8.3)

BME, bone marrow edema; χ2, chi-square test.

Discussion

This study revealed significant differences in the knee MRI findings of asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers compared to the control group. These findings will contribute to the assessment and interpretation of knee MRI findings in Kangoo Jumpers who undergo MRI to investigate any suspected trauma or osteoarticular lesion.

The most significant MRI finding in Kangoo Jumpers’ knees was BME. Most traumatic knee BMEs correlate with the mechanism of the knee injury. Sanders classified traumatic knee BME into five different patterns, which are pivot shift, clip, dashboard, hyperextension injuries and lateral patellar dislocation.9,10 All these BME patterns appear after acute trauma and extend to the subchondral bone tissue. Several authors have shown an association between articular cartilage defects and subchondral BME.11,12 Not only acute trauma, but also the altered or increased mechanical stresses on the bone lead to BME. In 88.9% of the athletes, a femoral longitudinal BME was seen just posterior of the anterior femoral cortex. This femoral longitudinal BME does not extend to cartilage tissue, unlike traumatic BME. This BME does not cause any thickening of the periost or anterior femoral cortex and also does not cause edema in the surrounding soft tissue. Repetitive jumping can increase the tensile force over the anterior femoral cortex. The anterior femoral cortex exhibits respond to this mechanical stress. This response includes edema, microfractures and trabecular remodeling. This histological change is seen as a BME in MRI.5,6 Also, we detected 47.2% BME in femoral condyles or tibial plateaus. This rate is high in comparison to the control group and is compatible with 81% of asymptomatic basketball players,7 50% and 41.3% of asymptomatic soccer players,5,6 and 26.9% of asymptomatic swimmers.2

Other significant findings in the Kangoo Jumpers included patellar tendinopathy (63.9%), quadriceps tendinopathy (80.6%) and gastrocnemius tendinopathy (63.9%). Repetitive jumping increases the forces to the extensor tendons, particularly on landing.13 Straining in the tendons leads to microtears. These microtears heal improperly with type I collagen produced by tenocytes, which leads to tendon degeneration.14 Degeneration in these tendons could cause tenderness, painful swelling, restrictive sporting activity or can be detected incidentally in the athlete’s knee MRI in the presymptomatic phase, as in our athletes. Patellar and quadriceps tendinopathy have been reported to occur frequently in sports involving recurrent jumping13. The study we conducted revealed that the ratio of patellar and quadriceps tendinopathy was compatible with a previous study in which basketball players’ knees were evaluated with MRI.7

In this study, infrapatellar and suprapatellar fat pad edema were detected in Kangoo Jumpers’ knees 75% and 63.9%, respectively. There are two widely accepted theories for fat pad edema formation. The first theory is excessive knee hyperextension or rotation and repetitive microtrauma. It is thought that the fat pad squeezes between the patella and femoral condyles and leads to inflammation, and the latter possible patellar maltracking can increase this squeeze and inflammation.15,16 In the literature, infrapatellar fat pad edema was detected in asymptomatic adolescent soccer players, asymptomatic adolescent swimmers and asymptomatic collegiate basketball players 35.7%, 53.8%, and 75%, respectively.2,5,7 This prevalence is increasing in sports that have intense flexion, extension and rotation movements. It is inevitable that this ratio will be high for those participating in the sport of Kangoo Jumping.

In this study, the meniscal signal change was detected in 72.2% of the Kangoo Jumpers’ knees. In the study conducted by Pappas et al.,7 knee MRI evaluations of asymptomatic collegiate basketball players showed 50% meniscal signal change in the preseason and 61% in the postseason. Walczak et al.17 reported meniscal signal changes in 54% of asymptomatic The National Basketball Association (NBA) players. These results are compatible to our study. The meniscal signal change could have occured by myxoid degeneration, microcyst formation, calcification and fragmentation of collagen fibers. However, Grade II degeneration could be caused by intrasubstance meniscal tears and increased vascularity.18 This degenerative change is due to the fact that the repetitive flexion, extension and rotation movements cause excessive mechanical stress on the meniscus tissue.

In this study, patellofemoral joint cartilage signal change and irregularity was observed in 72.2% of the Kangoo Jumpers’ knees. It was Grade I in 20 knees and Grade II in 6 knees. This finding is seen as a consequence of increased mechanical stress in the patellofemoral joint. It has been shown that there is a change in collagen structure, interstitial water content and proteoglycan content in the articular cartilage after exercise.19 As cartilage is an avascular tissue, there is limited ability to recover after injury. This can lead to signal change in MRI. Although a high prevalence of cartilage damage was seen in the patellofemoral joint, it was observed that the tibiofemoral joint was spared.

It was observed that the asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers had a high prevalence of knee MRI abnormalities. This high prevalence is related to repetitive stress over the knee. However, technical mistakes like single leg landing20 or spreading the legs more than shoulder width while landing should also be questioned as a cause of increased MRI finding prevalence. The long-term effects of this sport have not been reported in literature. Tendinopathy findings as well as cartilage and meniscal signal changes are estimated to cause faster degenerative changes in the knee joint. On the other hand, the body may accommodate the repetitive stress over the anterior femoral cortex, femoral condyles and tibial plateau. Longitudinal femoral BME is the most significant finding in Kangoo Jumpers’ knees as it has not previously been reported. We estimate that the incidence of this kind of edema may decrease in long-term Kangoo Jumpers with remodeling and strengthening of the loaded regions.

The high prevalence of findings in this study may be a result of the usage of 3T MRI instead of 3T or 1.5T MRI. It has been reported that 3T MRI has improved the visualization of anatomical structures as well as the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, grading of cartilage injury and other pathology.2123

Conclusion

This study revealed many types of knee MRI findings of asymptomatic Kangoo Jumpers compared to the control group. These MRI findings can predict and prevent possible acute knee injury or chronic joint problems like osteoarthritis. However, long-term follow-up cohort studies are needed to better understand the significance of these findings.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Nail Bölükbaşı (Chief of Staff at Kyrenia University, Dr. Suat Günsel Hospital) for allowing the MRI examination of candidates.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Vance J, Mercer JA. Impact forces during running in a novel spring boot. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, San Diego, 2001; 109. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Soder RB, Mizerkowski MD, Petkowicz R, Baldisserotto M. MRI of the knee in asymptomatic adolescent swimmers: a controlled study. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46:268–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stahl R, Luke A, Ma CB, et al. Prevalence of pathologic findings in asymptomatic knees of marathon runners before and after a competition in comparison with physically active subjects: a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging study. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37:627–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schueller G, Uffmann M, Bader T. Incidence of chronic knee lesions in long-distance runners based on training level: findings at MRI. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58:286–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soder RB, Simões JD, Soder JB, Baldisserotto M. MRI of the knee joint in asymptomatic adolescent soccer players: a controlled study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:W61–W65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matiotti SB, Soder RB, Becker RG, Santos FS, Baldisserotto M. MRI of the knees in asymptomatic adolescent soccer players: a case-control study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 45:59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pappas GP, Vogelsong MA, Staroswiecki E, Gold GE, Safran MR. Magnetic resonance imaging of asymptomatic knees in collegiate basketball players: the effect of one season of play. Clin J Sport Med 2016; 26:483–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noyes FR, Stabler CL. A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17:505–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sanders TG, Medynski MA, Feller JF, Lawhorn KW. Bone contusion patterns of the knee at MR imaging: footprint of the mechanism of injury. Radiographics 2000; 20:S135–S151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayes CW, Brigido MK, Jarnadar DA, Propeck T. Mechanism-based pattern approach to classification of complex injuries of the knee depicted at MR imaging. Radiographics 2000; 20:S121–S134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kijowski R, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A. Subchondral bone marrow edema in patients with degeneration of the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 2006; 238:943–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rubin DA, Harner CD, Costello JM. Treatable chondral injuries in the knee: frequency of associated focal subchondral edema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1099–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lian O, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevalence of jumper’s knee among elite athletes from different sports: a cross-sectional study. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33:561–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Khan KM, Maffulli N, Coleman BD, Cook JL, Taunton JE. Patellar tendinopathy: some aspects of basic science and clinical management. Br J Sports Med 1998; 32:346–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saddik D, McNally EG, Richardson M. MRI of Hoffa’s fat pad. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33:433–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.LLopis E, Padrón M. Anterior knee pain. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62:27–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Walczak BE, McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Zelazny A, Tedeschi F, Cole BJ. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg 2008; 21:27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li CA, Kim MK, Kim IH, Lee JH, Jang KY, Lee SY. Correlation of histological examination of meniscus with MR images: focused on high signal intensity of the meniscus not caused by definite meniscal tear and impact on MR diagnosis of tears. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14:935–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Putz R. The effects of exercise on human articular cartilage. J Anat 2006; 208:491–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ugalde V, Brockman C, Bailowitz Z, Pollard CD. Single leg squat test and its relationship to dynamic knee valgus and injury risk screening. PM R 2015; 7:229–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:371–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW, Shinki K, Kaplan LD, De Smet AA. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 2009; 250:839–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wong S, Steinbach L, Zhao J, Stehling C, Ma CB, Link TM. Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38:761–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

RESOURCES