Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2020 Feb 17;19(4):2765–2772. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11408

Upregulation of MYBL2 independently predicts a poorer prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Shan-Shan Sun 1, Yang Fu 2, Jian-Yang Lin 1,
PMCID: PMC7068560  PMID: 32218829

Abstract

MYB protooncogene-like 2 (MYBL2) is a transcription factor that is upregulated and significantly associated with various human cancer types. However, the potential role of MYBL2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is yet to be elucidated. Therefore, the expression and biological functions of MYBL2 in ccRCC were assessed in the current study using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare MYBL2 expression between ccRCC and normal tissues. Moreover, the association between MYBL2 expression and various clinicopathological factors was estimated using both the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression. The differences in prognosis between patients with high- and low-MYBL2 expression were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to investigate the biofunctions of MYBL2 in ccRCC. It was revealed that MYBL2 was upregulated in ccRCC, and that the MYBL2 high-expression phenotype was significantly associated with sex, a high histological grade, an advanced clinical stage, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and poor overall survival (OS). It was also revealed, via the Cox regression analysis, that the upregulation of MYBL2 expression was able to independently predict a poor prognosis in patients with ccRCC. GSEA indicated that the intestinal immune network for IgA production, primary immunodeficiency, the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, the p53 signaling pathway and the chemokine signaling pathway were all enriched in the high-MYBL2 expression datasets. In conclusion, the present findings indicate that MYBL2 may be used as an independent prognostic factor in patients with ccRCC.

Keywords: MYBL2, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, prognosis, The Cancer Genome Atlas, gene set enrichment analysis

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common renal malignancy, causing approximately 99200 new cases and almost 39100 deaths in Europe in 2018 (1). Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common pathological type of RCC, accounting for 80–90% of total cases globally in 2016 (2). Although surgical resection is an effective treatment option for early ccRCC, the prognosis for patients with metastatic ccRCC is poor (3). Targeted therapy is a promising anticancer strategy (4) and the identification of novel hub genes specific to ccRCC may improve targeted treatment and confer significant benefit on patients.

MYB protooncogene-like 2 (MYBL2), a member of the myeloblastosis family of transcription factors, influences numerous factors affecting cell cycle progression (5). Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that MYBL2 expression is significantly associated with various carcinomas. For example, upregulated MYBL2 expression was identified in gastric cancer and predicted a poor prognosis, indicating that MYBL2 may serve as a promising biomarker (6). Overexpressed MYBL2 promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of breast cancer cells targeted by miR-143-3p (7). Moreover, MYBL2 knockdown suppressed the growth of esophageal squamous cell and colorectal carcinoma cells via regulation of the cell cycle (8). In other cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (9), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (10) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (11), high MYBL2 expression also promoted the progression of tumors and resulted in a poorer prognosis. However, the influence of MYBL2 expression on ccRCC is yet to be elucidated.

Therefore, MYBL2 expression was analyzed in ccRCC, and the association between MYBL2 and the prognosis of patients with ccRCC was determined in the current study. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to investigate the biological functions of MYBL2 in ccRCC. According to previous studies, it was hypothesized that MYBL2 may independently predict the prognosis of ccRCC patients and may represent a novel therapeutic target.

Materials and methods

Patient samples

The mRNA expression data and corresponding clinical data from patients with ccRCC were downloaded from the official website of The Cancer Genome Atlas database (National Institutes of Health), dataset TCGA-Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. A total of 611 gene expression data profiles and 537 clinical data profiles were retrieved from TCGA ccRCC database in July 2019. The 611 gene expression data profiles were used to evaluate the differential expression of MYBL2 between tumor (539) and healthy tissues (72). Subsequently, patients lacking gene expression data or all clinicopathological characteristics were excluded, 530 ccRCC profiles with both gene expression and clinical data were included for further analysis. Some patients had incomplete clinicopathological characteristics data, such as T stage (12), therefore these patients were included in analysis of clinical information they possessed, but excluded in the analysis of clinicopathological characteristics they lacked. Hence, some variables in Table I do not total 530.

Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma, retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas database.

Clinical characteristics Value
Median age at diagnosis, years (range) 61 (21–90)
Sex, %
  Female 35.1
  Male 64.9
Histological gradea, %
  I   2.7
  II 43.5
  III 39.5
  IV 14.3
Clinical stagea, %
  I 50.3
  II 10.8
  III 23.3
  IV 15.6
T stagea, %
  T1 51.1
  T2 13.1
  T3 33.8
  T4 0.02
Lymph node metastasis N stagea, %
  N0 93.7
  N1   6.3
Distant metastasis M stagea, %
  M0 84.3
  M1 15.7
a

(ref. 12). T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis.

GSEA

GSEA was used to investigate the potential functions of MYBL2 in ccRCC. The pretense of GSEA is to use predefined gene sets (usually from functional annotation or results of previous studies) to rank genes according to the degree of differential expression in two types of samples, and then test whether the preselected gene sets are enriched at the top or bottom of this ranking table. In the present study, the ‘c2.cp.kegg.v6.2.symbols.gmt’ gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp) were analyzed using GSEA 3.0 software (BROAD Institute). To obtain normalized enrichment scores (NESs), the nominal P-value and false discovery rate (FDR) q-value were determined. The number of gene set permutations for each analysis was set at 1,000, and the phenotype label was the expression level of MYBL2. Gene sets with a nominal P-value of <0.05 and an FDR q-value of <0.25 were considered significantly enriched (13).

Statistical analysis

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare MYBL2 expression in tumor and healthy tissues. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare MYBL2 expression in paired tissues. To examine the association between clinicopathological factors and MYBL2 expression (after excluding healthy tissue sample data) the Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparison between two groups (sex, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis), and the Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni's post-hoc test was performed for multi-group comparison [tumor (T) stage, clinical stage and histological grade] (12), then logistic regression was conducted for further analysis. The median value of MYBL2 expression was selected as the cutoff value, and patients with ccRCC were subsequently divided into high- and low-expression groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and log rank tests performed to evaluate the association between MYBL2 expression and overall survival (OS). A univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to explore the association of clinicopathological factors and MYBL2 expression with OS, and a multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate whether MYBL2 can independently influence prognosis. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.3 software (14), Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 26.0 software (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software (GraphPad Software).

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 530 included patients, the median patient age was 61 years (range, 26–90), and there were 14, 227, 206 and 75 patients with histological grade I, II, III and IV, respectively. A total of 265, 57, 123 and 82 patients presented with clinical stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. There were also 271, 69, 179 and 11 patients with T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. Notably, 239 and 16 patients presented with node (N)0 and N1, respectively, and there were 420 and 78 patients with metastasis (M)0 and M1, respectively. The characteristics of the included patients with ccRCC are summarized in Table I. A number of samples retrieved from TCGA had incomplete clinicopathological characteristics, therefore, samples lacking specific clinicopathological characteristics will be excluded when these clinicopathological characteristics were counted.

Upregulation of MYBL2

It was revealed that MYBL2 was significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1A). In addition, MYBL2 was also significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues compared with paired healthy tissues (P<0.001; Fig. 1B). The data from Fig. 1A and B were derived from TCGA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Comparison of MYBL2 expression between ccRCC and healthy tissues using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare MYBL2 expression between tumor and healthy tissues. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare MYBL2 expression in paired tumor and non-tumorous tissues. (A) The expression of MYBL2 in ccRCC tissues (n=537) was significantly higher compared with normal tissues (n=72). (B) Compared with 72 paired normal tissues, ccRCC tissues exhibited significant upregulation of MYBL2. ***P<0.001. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Association of MYBL2 expression and clinicopathological factors

The median value of MYBL2 expression was selected as the cut-off value and patients with ccRCC were divided into high- and low-expression groups. The median follow-up times for the high- and low-MYBL2 expression groups were 967 and 951 months, respectively. As indicated in Fig. 2A-F, the upregulation of MYBL2 was significantly associated with sex, an advanced T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, clinical stage and histological grade. Logistic regression demonstrated that increased MYBL2 expression was significantly associated with age, sex, histologic grade, clinical stage, T stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis (Table II). The data from Fig. 2A-F was derived from TCGA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Analysis of TGCA datasets was conducted to determine expression of MYBL2 and its association with clinicopathological variables. The median value of MYBL2 expression was considered the cutoff value. To examine the association between clinicopathological factors and MYBL2 expression after excluding normal sample data, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed for comparison between two groups [sex, N stage and M stage (12)], the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for multigroup comparison [T stage, clinical stage and histological grade (12)]. The association between MYBL2 expression and OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. (A) Sex; (B) T stage; (C) N stage; (D) M stage; (E) histological grade; and (F) clinical stage. (G) Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the prognosis of patients with ccRCC with high MYBL2 expression was poorer than that of patients with ccRCC with low MYBL2 expression. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 TGCA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; MYBL2, MYB protooncogene-like 2; T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis.

Table II.

Association of MYB protooncogene-like 2 expression levels with the clinicopathological factors of patients using logistic regression analysis.

Clinical characteristics Total, n Odds ratio for MYBL2 expression (Confidence Interval) P-value
Age, years 530 0.98 (0.96–0.99) 0.003b
Sex, male vs. female 530 1.54 (1.08–2.21) 0.018a
Histological graded, IV vs. I 89 22.15 (5.36–151.97) <0.001c
Clinical staged, IV vs. I 347 2.99 (1.78–5.11) <0.001c
T staged, T4 vs. T1 530 6.19 (1.56–41.15) 0.021a
N staged, N1 vs. N0 255 4.91 (1.54–21.83) 0.015a
M staged, M1 vs. M0 498 3.85 (1.39–2.29) 0.001b
a

P<0.05

b

P<0.01

c

P<0.001.

d

(ref. 12). Patients were stratified into high- and low-expression groups, with the median expression level selected as the cut-off value. T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis.

MYBL2 can be considered a prognostic factor for ccRCC

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with ccRCC with high MYBL2 expression exhibited a poorer OS rate compared with the low-expression group (Fig. 2G). Moreover, the univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high MYBL2 expression was strongly associated with a poor prognosis. Other clinical variables, such as age, grade, stage, T stage, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were all associated with OS. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that high MYBL2 expression, age and distant metastasis were independently associated with a poor prognosis (Table III). Therefore, MYBL2 may be an independent prognostic biomarker for patients with ccRCC.

Table III.

Association of OS and clinicopathological characteristics in patients from TCGA database using Cox regression.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Characteristics HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
Age, years 1.02 1.00–1.04 0.012a 1.03 1.01–1.05 0.001b
Sex, male vs. female 1.01 0.67–1.54 0.951 1.11 0.71–1.73 0.657
MYB protooncogene-like 2 expression, high vs. low 1.52 1.29–1.78 <0.001c 1.29 1.08–1.55 0.004b
Histological graded 2.24 1.68–2.99 <0.001c 1.27 0.91–1.79 0.164
Clinical staged 1.86 1.54–2.25 <0.001c 1.11 0.71–1.74 0.645
T staged 3.31 2.17–5.06 <0.001c 1.61 0.77–3.38 0.208
N staged 2.93 1.52–5.67 0.001b 1.31 0.64–2.68 0.456
M staged 4.07 2.63–6.30 <0.001c 2.25 1.03–4.79 0.041a
a

P<0.05

b

P<0.01

c

P<0.001.

d

(ref. 12). HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; T, tumor; N, node; M, metastasis.

Biological pathogenesis of MYBL2 in ccRCC

GSEA revealed that the ‘intestinal immune network for IgA production’, ‘primary immunodeficiency’, ‘the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway’, ‘the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway’, ‘the p53 signaling pathway’ and ‘the chemokine signaling pathway’ (Fig. 3A-F) were enriched in the high MYBL2 expression datasets (Table IV).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Enrichment plots from GSEA. GSEA was conducted to identify the differentially activated signaling pathways in the high MYBL2 expression ccRCC datasets. GSEA revealed that (A) ‘the intestinal immune network for IgA production’, (B) ‘primary immunodeficiency’, (C) ‘the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway’, (D) ‘the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway’, (E) ‘the p53 signaling pathway’ and (F) ‘the chemokine signaling pathway’ were significantly enriched in patients with upregulated MYBL2 expression. The data from (A-F) were derived from GSEA. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; MYBL2, MYB protooncogene-like 2; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; NES, normalized enrichment score; NOM, nominal; FDR, false discovery rate; q-val, q-value.

Table IV.

Gene sets enriched in the high-MYB protooncogene-like 2 expression phenotypes.

Gene set name NES NOM P-value FDR q-value
KEGG_INTESTINAL_IMMUNE_NETWORK_FOR_IGA_PRODUCTION 2.202 <0.001b <0.001
KEGG_PRIMARY_IMMUNODEFICIENCY 2.146 <0.001b <0.001
KEGG_JAK_STAT_SIGNALING_PATHWAY 1.999 <0.001b 0.005
KEGG_CYTOSOLIC_DNA_SENSING_PATHWAY 1.993 <0.001b 0.004
KEGG_CHEMOKINE_SIGNALING_PATHWAY 1.953 0.002a 0.006
KEGG_P53_SIGNALING_PATHWAY 1.948 0.002a 0.006
a

P<0.01

b

P<0.001. Gene sets with NOM P-value <0.05 and FDR q-value <0.25 were considered significant. NES, normalized enrichment score; NOM, nominal; FDR, false discovery rate; JAK-STAT, janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Discussion

In the present study, analyzing the data from TCGA provided a direction for further research and generated genomic and statistical evidence to support novel candidate cancer targets for therapeutic and diagnostic development. In the current study, it was revealed that the upregulation of MYBL2 was significantly associated with sex, high histological grade, advanced clinical stage, T stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and poor OS rate, and may therefore be used as an independent prognostic factor for patients with ccRCC, according to data from TCGA. Furthermore, the results of GSEA demonstrated that MYBL2 upregulation was significantly associated with classical tumor-associated pathways and immune-associated pathways.

Previous findings have demonstrated that MYBL2 regulates the progression of malignant tumors by inhibiting the cell cycle and activating tumor-associated genes and pathways via transcription factor activity (15). The upregulation of MYBL2 has been reported in various cancer types, suggesting that MYBL2 may promote tumorigenesis. For example, the upregulation of MYBL2 was revealed to promote progression of the G1-S phase transition by suppressing insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3; thus, MYBL2 may represent a novel therapeutic biomarker in NSCLC (16). Other findings indicated that MYBL2 regulated breast cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis via the targeting of microRNA-143-3p (7). Therefore, MYBL2 may serve as an effective therapeutic target. Notably, the high expression and carcinogenic effects of MYBL2 in ccRCC were described in detail in the present study.

GSEA was then performed; it is able to detect the expression changes in gene sets rather than in individual genes and is considered more flexible and reliable than traditional methods, such as Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, making it one of the most commonly used pathway analysis methods to study the biological function of tumors (17). However, for genes with complex interactions and insufficient annotation information, the sensitivity of GSEA is reduced due to functional class scoring, the approach of GSEA (18). GSEA demonstrated that MYBL2 is involved in various pathways associated with tumor progression, such as the intestinal immune network for IgA production, primary immunodeficiency, the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, the p53 signaling pathway and the chemokine signaling pathway. Some of these pathways have been reported to be associated with other cancer types. In HCC cells, increased apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3F expression promoted cell proliferation and migration, which were mediated by immune-associated pathways (19). Moreover, a high incidence of cancer, especially lymphoma, has been reported in subjects with primary immunodeficiency (20). Numerous studies have reported the association between JAK/STAT and various malignancies and inflammatory pathologies, suggesting that JAK-targeted drugs may be successful for the treatment of cancer and immune-mediated diseases (2127). A previous study indicated that the downregulation of MYBL2 caused cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase via the p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway (28).

However, there were still certain limitations to the current study. Notably, the number of normal tissues was significantly lower than the number of tumorous tissues retrieved from TCGA database. The factors associated with patient prognosis, such as the use of drugs, surgical treatment and surgical details, were lacking. Moreover, the protein levels or direct mechanisms underlying the role of MYBL2 in ccRCC could not be assessed using TCGA database. Therefore, accounting for various confounding factors to more accurately assess the association between MYBL2 and OS, and exploring the specific molecular mechanisms involved represent a promising focus for future research.

In conclusion, it was revealed that the upregulation of MYBL2 in ccRCC was associated with certain advanced clinical factors and was able to independently predict a poor prognosis, indicating that MYBL2 expression may represent a promising biomarker and potential therapeutic target for the treatment of patients with ccRCC. However, the protein expression levels of MYBL2 and the specific molecular mechanisms underlying poor prognosis of ccRCC need to be further explored in future research.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Glossary

Abbreviations

RCC

renal cell carcinoma

ccRCC

clear cell renal cell carcinoma

TCGA

The Cancer Genome Atlas

GSEA

gene set enrichment analysis

NES

normalized enrichment score

FDR

false discovery rate

OS

overall survival

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81302841) and the University Outstanding Talent Support Plan Foundation of Liaoning Province (grant no. LJQ2014086).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in The Cancer Genome Atlas repository, (portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).

Authors' contributions

JYL and YF designed this research project. SSS and YF contributed to data collection, analysis and interpretation. All authors participated in writing of the manuscript for the relevant sections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work is appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Dyba T, Randi G, Bettio M, Gavin A, Visser O, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bensalah K, Dabestani S, Fernández-Pello S, Giles RH, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: The 2019 update. Eur Urol. 2019;75:799–810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N, Bhayani S, Bro WP, Chang SS, Choueiri TK, Costello BA, Derweesh IH, Fishman M, et al. Kidney cancer, version 2.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:804–834. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gore ME, Larkin JM. Challenges and opportunities for converting renal cell carcinoma into a chronic disease with targeted therapies. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:399–406. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Iness AN, Felthousen J, Ananthapadmanabhan V, Sesay F, Saini S, Guiley KZ, Rubin SM, Dozmorov M, Litovchick L. The cell cycle regulatory DREAM complex is disrupted by high expression of oncogenic B-Myb. Oncogene. 2019;38:1080–1092. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0490-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jia Y, Gao Y, Li J, Chang Z, Yan J, Qin Y. Prognostic implications of MYBL2 in resected Chinese gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1129–1135. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S188820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen J, Chen X. MYBL2 is targeted by miR-143-3p and regulates breast cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. Oncol Res. 2018;26:913–922. doi: 10.3727/096504017X15135941182107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 8.Qin H, Li Y, Zhang H, Wang F, He H, Bai X, Li S. Prognostic implications and oncogenic roles of MYBL2 protein expression in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1917–1927. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S190145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guan Z, Cheng W, Huang D, Wei A. High MYBL2 expression and transcription regulatory activity is associated with poor overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Res Transl Med. 2018;66:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jin Y, Zhu H, Cai W, Fan X, Wang Y, Niu Y, Song F, Bu Y. B-Myb is up-regulated and promotes cell growth and motility in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(pii):E860. doi: 10.3390/ijms18060860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu R, Li C, Lin X, Chen Q, Li J, Song L, Lin L, Liu J, Zhang Y, Kong W, et al. Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications of MYBL2 protein expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213:964–968. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th. Springer; 2017. pp. 751–752. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu H, Zhang J. Decreased expression of TFAP2B in endometrial cancer predicts poor prognosis: A study based on TCGA data. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149:592–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Team RC. R foundation for statistical computing, version 2.15.1; Vienna, Austria: 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Musa J, Aynaud MM, Mirabeau O, Delattre O, Grünewald TG. MYBL2 (B-Myb): A central regulator of cell proliferation, cell survival and differentiation involved in tumorigenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2895. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fan X, Wang Y, Jiang T, Cai W, Jin Y, Niu Y, Zhu H, Bu Y. B-Myb mediates proliferation and migration of non-small-cell lung cancer via suppressing IGFBP3. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(pii):E1479. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: Current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yang Z, Tao Y, Xu X, Cai F, Yu Y, Ma L. Bufalin inhibits cell proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via APOBEC3F induced intestinal immune network for IgA production signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:2124–2131. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.07.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mayor PC, Eng KH, Singel KL, Abrams SI, Odunsi K, Moysich KB, Fuleihan R, Garabedian E, Lugar P, Ochs HD, et al. Cancer in primary immunodeficiency diseases: Cancer incidence in the United States immune deficiency network registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141:1028–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Villarino AV, Kanno Y, O'Shea JJ. Mechanisms and consequences of Jak-STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat Immunol. 2017;18:374–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.3691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cui C, Cheng X, Yan L, Ding H, Guan X, Zhang W, Tian X, Hao C. Downregulation of TfR1 promotes progression of colorectal cancer via the JAK/STAT pathway. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:6323–6341. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S198911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Toh TB, Lim JJ, Hooi L, Rashid MBMA, Chow EK. Targeting Jak/Stat pathway as a therapeutic strategy against SP/CD44+ tumorigenic cells in Akt/β-catenin-driven hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020;72:104–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang X, Liao X, Yu T, Gong Y, Zhang L, Huang J, Yang C, Han C, Yu L, Zhu G, et al. Analysis of clinical significance and prospective molecular mechanism of main elements of the JAK/STAT pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2019;55:805–822. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2019.4862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mendez Luque LF, Blackmon AL, Ramanathan G, Fleischman AG. Key role of inflammation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Instigator of disease initiation, progression, and symptoms. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019;14:145–153. doi: 10.1007/s11899-019-00508-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cornez I, Yajnanarayana SP, Wolf AM, Wolf D. JAK/STAT disruption induces immuno-deficiency: Rationale for the development of JAK inhibitors as immunosuppressive drugs. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;451:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Welsch K, Holstein J, Laurence A, Ghoreschi K. Targeting JAK/STAT signalling in inflammatory skin diseases with small molecule inhibitors. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47:1096–1107. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fischer M, Quaas M, Steiner L, Engeland K. The p53-p21-DREAM-CDE/CHR pathway regulates G2/M cell cycle genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:164–174. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in The Cancer Genome Atlas repository, (portal.gdc.cancer.gov/).


Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES