Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;23(3):100939. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100939

Table 3.

Comparative Performance of MutaBind2 and Three Methods for Predicting Mutations Highly Decreasing and Increasing Binding Affinity on the Independent Test Set of S1748

MutaBind2 MutaBind BeAtMuSiC FoldX
Highly decreasing

Sensitivity 0.75 0.86 0.73 0.58
Specificity 0.89 0.82 0.87 0.94
MCC 0.63 0.63 0.58 0.57
AUC 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.79

Highly increasing

Sensitivity 0.55 0 0 0.44
Specificity 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99
MCC 0.64 −0.01 0 0.51
AUC 0.86 0.65∗ 0.56∗ 0.74∗

MutaBind2 was retrained on the dataset “Skempi + Reverse.”

MCC, Matthews correlation coefficient.

∗p value < 0.01 calculated by Delong test (DeLong et al., 1988) comparing AUC (area under the ROC curve) produced by a given method and AUC produced by MutaBind2; points to significant differences in performance. See also Figure S6.