Skip to main content
Antioxidants logoLink to Antioxidants
. 2020 Feb 9;9(2):146. doi: 10.3390/antiox9020146

The Kinetics of Total Phenolic Content and Monomeric Flavan-3-ols during the Roasting Process of Criollo Cocoa

Editha Fernández-Romero 1, Segundo G Chavez-Quintana 2, Raúl Siche 3, Efraín M Castro-Alayo 2,4,*, Fiorella P Cardenas-Toro 4
PMCID: PMC7070796  PMID: 32050504

Abstract

Cocoa beans are the main raw material for the manufacture of chocolate and are currently gaining great importance due to their antioxidant potential attributed to the total phenolic content (TPC) and the monomeric flavan-3-ols (epicatechin and catechin). The objective of this study was to determine the degradation kinetics parameters of TPC, epicatechin, and catechin during the roasting process of Criollo cocoa for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min at 90, 110, 130, 150, 170, 190, and 200 °C. The results showed a lower degradation of TPC (10.98 ± 6.04%) and epicatechin (8.05 ± 3.01%) at 130 °C and 10 min of roasting, while a total degradation of epicatechin and a 92.29 ± 0.06% degradation of TPC was obtained at 200 °C and 50 min. Reaction rate constant (k) and activation energy (Ea) were 0.02–0.10 min−1 and 24.03 J/mol for TPC and 0.02–0.13 min−1 and 22.51 J/mol for epicatechin, respectively. Degradation kinetics of TPC and epicatechin showed first-order reactions, while the catechin showed patterns of formation and degradation.

Keywords: roasting, catechin, epicatechin, total phenolic content, Criollo cocoa, kinetic

1. Introduction

Cocoa beans, the seeds of the tree Theobroma cacao L., are the key raw material for chocolate production [1]. Criollo is the finest variety of cocoa [2]. Its seeds are aromatic, mild tasting, and with low bitterness: they represent the ideal raw material for a quality chocolate [1,3]. For obtaining chocolate from cocoa beans, one very important stage in the process is the roasting [4], which results in the production of desirable flavor and aroma compounds, as well as color changes [5]. The temperature and duration of roasting substantially affected the character in chemical and physical changes of cocoa beans [6].

Cocoa and chocolate have recently gained much attention due to their potential benefits in human health [1,7,8,9,10] and have recently become the target of increased scientific research due to their health promoting properties [11]. Cocoa, from a therapeutic viewpoint, is important due to the high concentrations of polyphenols as antioxidants [12]. These health effects have been assumed to be associated with the presence of polyphenols, among which are monomeric flavan-3-ols: epicatechin and catechin [5,13,14,15,16]. The beneficial effects of cocoa polyphenols to human health are, among others, the scavenge of free radicals and prevention of damage to DNA, the chelation of metals, vasoprotective effects, improvements in endothelial function, anti-inflammatory effects, the amelioration of insulin resistance, and anticarcinogenic effects, among others [13,17,18,19,20,21]. Cocoa is a rich source of polyphenolic compounds and may account for 12–18% of the dry mass of the beans [5]. Typically, polyphenols are sensitive to heat during the process, especially under a high temperature environment, i.e., roasting and drying [22,23]. Additionally, roasting influences the alteration of bioactive compounds [24]. In particular, the roasting process leads to the loss or modification of flavanols, which leads to a 14% loss of the total phenolic content (TPC), as well as the epimerization of epicatechin to catechin [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].

Kinetic modeling can provide a deeper understanding of the changes that occur during thermal processing controlling and food quality optimization [33,34]. Since these roasting techniques were introduced to the chocolate industry, the roasting time and temperature have been studied, applying designs or models that allow for a proper assessment of the process [35]. Various studies have been reported on the effect of roasting on cocoa nibs’ coloration, physical/chemical changes [4,5,8,16,23,25,36], flavor changes [37], and the kinetics of polyphenol degradation during drying [12,28,38]; however, studies on the kinetics of the polyphenol and monomeric flavan-3-ol degradation of Criollo cocoa during the roasting process are scarce, so the aim of the present study was to understand this degradation and determine the kinetic parameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Approximately 14 kg of dried fermented cocoa beans of Criollo variety were obtained directly from Multi-Service Cooperative APROCAM in the Bagua province, Amazon region, Perú.

2.2. Chemicals and Standards

Methanol HPLC grade (JT Baker, Deventer, The Netherlands), Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, ≥98% (-)-epicatechin (HPLC) from green tea, ≥97% (-)-catechin (HPLC) from green tea, and ≥90% petroleum ether were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Diessenhofen, Germany).

2.3. Roasting Process

Samples of cocoa bean were subjected to different treatments of time and temperature as conditions of the roasting process. Prior to the roast, the beans were selected according to their size, choosing beans of uniform size. Criollo cocoa samples (100 g) were roasted in a roaster (IMSA, ERTC-51, Lima, Perú) in the Agroindustry Plant Pilot at Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Perú.

2.4. Chemical Analysis

2.4.1. Methanolic Extraction of Phenolic Compounds and Monomeric Flavan-3-ols

According to Summa et al. [29] regarding some modifications, three cocoa beans were ground in a pestle from each sample. The powder was defatted by extraction with petroleum ether and centrifuged using a centrifuge (MPW Med Instruments, MPW-51, Warszawa, Poland) at 3000 rpm for 15 min at room temperature. The supernatant was then discarded. Fresh petroleum ether was added and then centrifuged (four times). The resulting defatted material was air dried at room temperature. Methanol extraction based on the methodology used by Jonfia-Essien et al. [30] with some modifications was performed, and 0.5 g of defatted cocoa powder was homogenized in 25 mL of 80% methanol for 30 min in a magnetic stirrer and then filtered in a vacuum filter. This methanolic extract was used for the determination of both TPC and monomeric flavan-3-ols.

2.4.2. Total Phenolic Content

The TPC of the Criollo cocoa beans was determined following the procedures of Singleton et al. [31] and Hu et al. [7]. Diluted extract (0.1 mL) or blank (0.1 mL deionized water) was mixed with 7.9 mL water and 0.5 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent for 5 min at 22 °C. Next, 1.5 mL of saturated sodium carbonate solution was added. Reagents were mixed thoroughly by vigorous shaking for 10 s by hand. The mixture was incubated in the dark at 22 °C for 2 h before determination of the absorbance at 765 nm using an UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Unico, S2100, Dayton, NJ, USA). Gallic acid in 70% methanol was diluted (2–16 mg/L) to create a calibration curve. TPC is expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents/g defatted cocoa bean (mg GAE/gdf).

2.4.3. Quantification of Epicatechin and Catechin of the Methanolic Extract

Quantification of epicatechin and catechin followed the procedures of Wang et al. [39] with some modifications in a high performance liquid chromatography system (HPLC) (Lachrom Elite, Hitachi, Japan) equipped with a UV-Vis detector (Hitachi, Lachrom Elite L–2420, Wako, Japan) and isocratic pump (Hitachi, Lachrom Elite L–2130, Japan). The column used was a C18 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm (Merck, Purospher RP–18 endcapped, Darmstadt, Germany). The mobile phase was methanol/water/orthophosphoric acid (20/79.9/0.1), and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. Absorption wavelength was selected at 210 nm. The sample injection volume was 20 µL. Chromatographic peaks in the samples were identified by comparing their retention time and UV spectrum with those of the reference standards. A standard graph for each component was prepared by plotting concentration versus area. Quantification was carried out from integrated peak areas of the sample and corresponding standard graphs, and the epic/cat ratios of epicatechin and catechin concentrations were obtained.

2.4.4. TPC and Monomeric Flavan-3-ol Degradation

According to Martins et al. [40], the degradation was then calculated according to the following formula:

% degradation=(XcontrolXtXcontrol)100 (1)

where Xcontrol is the TPC, epicatechin, or catechin concentration in the control sample (unroasted cocoa bean), and Xt is the TPC, epicatechin, or catechin concentration at time t.

2.5. Experimental Desing for Kinetics of TPC and Monomeric Flavan-3-ols

Samples (100 g) in triplicate of Criollo cocoa beans were roasted for each combination of time and temperature (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min at 90, 110, 130, 150, 170, 190, and 200 °C), 105 samples were obtained. Means and standard deviations were calculated. The temperature and time values used were defined according to the published literature. Fitting procedures (Matlab 2014) were used to determine the reaction rate constants for TPC, epicatechin, and catechin. The general kinetic models of zero-, first-, and second-order reactions were used, presented in Equations (2)–(4), respectively [41].

[A]0[A]=kt (2)
[A]=[A]0 exp(kt) (3)
1[A]1[A]0= kt (4)

k (min−1) is the reaction rate constant at temperature T; t is the reaction time (min); [A]0 and [A] are the initial (control sample) and final amounts of TPC, epicatechin or catechin, respectively, at different times t and temperatures.

The final fitting models were obtained by matching and analyzing the initial models obtained by Matlab software with general equations of zero-, first-, and second-order reactions presented in Equations (2)–(4), respectively. The effect of temperature was evaluated by means of the Arrhenius equation.

k=k0e(Ea/RT). (5)

The activation energy Ea for the formation of each parameter was determined by linear regression of Ln k  curve versus 1/T with Equation (6).

Lnk=Lnk0 Ea/RT (6)

Ea (J/mol) is the apparent activation energy, R (8.3145 J/mol.K) is the universal gas constant, k is the reaction rate constant, and k0 is the pre-exponential factor.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results were compared using one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey test. Previously, Dixon’s Q test, for the identification and rejection of outliers, was used. Statistical analyses were carried out in Minitab 17 software.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Roasting on Monomeric Flavan-3-ols and TPC

The TPC, epicatechin, and catechin concentration and the epi/cat ratio of the unroasted (control sample) Criollo cocoa beans were 110.98 ± 1.43 mg GAE/gdf, 30.29 ± 1.0 mg/gdf, 2.71 ± 0.13 mg/gdf, and 11.20 ± 0.40, respectively (Table 1). These values served as a starting point for the study of degradation. The TPC and epicatechin values and the epi/cat ratios of the treatments were lower than the control sample. Some results show that the concentration of epicatechin in some cases increased. During the roasting process, the epi/cat ratio was reduced as the process temperature increased. Considering a time of 10 min, the epi/cat ratio was reduced from 6.08 ± 0.96 when heated at 90 °C to 3.20 ± 0.68 at 200 °C. Table 1 shows that epicatechin degradation reached 100% when Criollo cocoa beans were roasted for 50 min at 190 or 200 °C, while TPC did not reach full degradation at any temperature or time. The opposite happened with catechin, which showed patterns of formation. The values in bold indicate that there was formation instead of degradation.

Table 1.

Concentration and degradation of TPC and monomeric flavan-3-ols, epi/cat ratios, and the formation of catechin.

T (°C) Time (min) Concentration 1 Epi/Cat Ratio 1 Degradation 1 (%)
TPC (mg GAE/gdf) Epicatechin (mg/gdf) Catechin (mg/gdf) TPC Epicatechin Catechin 2
Control 0 110.98 ± 1.43a 30.29 ± 1.09a 2.71 ± 0.13a 11.20 ± 0.40a
90 10 54.60 ± 10.86b 14.97 ± 1.45b 2.48 ± 0.14ab 6.08 ± 0.96b 50.84 ± 9.47a 50.41 ± 6.61a 8.31 ± 5.43a
20 72.70 ± 7.44b 17.78 ± 3.13b 2.48 ± 0.05ab 7.20 ± 1.37b 34.44 ± 7.46a 41.25 ± 10.23a 8.31 ± 6.24a
30 45.10 ± 7.61b 11.78 ± 1.22b 2.20 ± 0.11b 5.35 ± 0.32b 59.41 ± 6.47a 61.07 ± 4.13a 18.69 ± 3.99a
40 62.10 ± 19.80b 12.92 ± 4.89b 2.22 ± 0.28b 5.93 ± 2.62b 43.90 ± 18.7a 57.0 ± 17.7a 18.25 ± 6.22a
50 51.58 ± 7.44b 13.75 ± 2.92b 2.48 ± 0.04ab 5.55 ± 1.24b 53.46 ± 7.29a 54.78 ± 8.05a 8.08 ± 5.82a
110 10 68.54 ± 4.05c 27.24 ± 0.53c 2.60 ± 0.07cd 10.50 ± 0.36c 38.21 ± 4.44c 10.02 ± 2.08d 2.22 ± 1.45d
20 60.84 ± 5.59cd 15.36 ± 0.47d 2.67 ± 0.21c 5.78 ± 0.50d 45.14 ± 5.72bc 49.20 ± 3.07c 7.78 ± 2.00cd
30 52.25 ± 3.86d 11.47 ± 0.46e 2.28 ± 0.08de 5.05 ± 0.28de 52.91 ± 3.59b 62.10 ± 1.50b 15.79 ± 4.65bc
40 48.14 ± 6.12d 8.28 ± 1.36e 2.33 ± 0.18cde 3.54 ± 0.31f 56.58 ± 5.95b 72.53 ± 5.49b 13.59 ± 8.53bcd
50 58.92 ± 6.57cd 8.22 ± 2.37e 2.06 ± 0.12e 3.96 ± 0.97ef 46.88 ± 6.30bc 72.77 ± 8.31b 24.00 ± 3.58b
130 10 98.85 ± 7.79e 28.74 ± 0.94f 3.01 ± 0.03f 9.55 ± 0.39g 10.98 ± 6.04f 8.05 ± 3.01e 11.46 ± 4.71e
20 52.24 ± 3.68f 11.21 ± 1.24g 2.69 ± 0.47f 4.20 ± 0.26h 52.93 ± 3.24e 62.87 ± 5.25d 14.22 ± 6.08e
30 35.34 ± 2.19g 9.47 ± 1.01gh 2.62 ± 0.23f 3.66 ± 0.67hi 68.14 ± 2.34d 68.77 ± 2.57cd 5.30 ± 4.23e
40 44.35 ± 7.73fg 10.46 ± 1.46g 3.30 ± 0.36f 3.23 ± 0.81hi 60.01 ± 7.15de 65.40 ± 5.08d 18.62 ± 7.50e
50 38.43 ± 3.98fg 6.98 ± 1.01h 2.95 ± 0.22f 2.36 ± 0.20i 65.40 ± 3.16de 76.99 ± 2.78c 9.08 ± 7.50e
150 10 46.71 ± 7.84h 11.25 ± 2.11i 2.62 ± 0.24g 4.26 ± 0.41j 57.85 ± 7.61h 62.70 ± 8.19h 8.66 ± 0.15f
20 48.78 ± 8.12h 8.70 ± 0.70 i j 3.49 ± 0.68g 2.59 ± 0.73k 56.07 ± 7.02h 71.29 ± 1.29gh 32.90 ± 25.60f
30 31.32 ± 2.25i 6.32 ± 0.53jk 3.79 ± 0.75g 1.70 ± 0.25kl 71.80 ± 1.72g 79.14 ± 1.51fg 39.60 ± 21.10f
40 31.27 ± 2.17i 5.72 ± 0.12k 3.64 ± 0.10g 1.57 ± 0.07kl 71.81 ± 2.18g 81.11 ± 0.84fg 34.61 ± 8.41f
50 28.22 ± 1.32i 4.27 ± 0.68k 3.01 ± 0.35g 1.41 ± 0.08l 74.57 ± 1.37g 85.95 ± 1.81f 11.05 ± 8.82f
170 10 42.10 ± 7.56j 12.33 ± 2.33l 3.48 ± 0.98hij 0.08 ± 0.02no 62.12 ± 6.39j 59.44 ± 6.36k 11.58 ± 0.01h
20 33.43 ± 7.28jk 6.75 ± 0.77m 4.66 ± 0.31hi 0.10 ± 0.02n 69.84 ± 6.81ij 77.75 ± 1.80j 72.34 ± 12.07gh
30 31.50 ± 6.43jk 5.41 ± 0.69mn 5.15 ± 1.11h 0.17 ± 0.05m 71.66 ± 5.50ij 82.11 ± 2.36ij 84.90 ± 37.90g
40 31.33 ± 7.40jk 4.16 ± 0.59mn 3.85 ± 0.66hij 0.12 ± 0.02mn 71.82 ± 6.36ij 86.26 ± 1.77ij 43.00 ± 30.30gh
50 19.54 ± 1.05k 3.12 ± 0.18n 3.19 ± 0.42ij 0.11 ± 0.01mn 82.40 ± 0.89i 89.70 ± 0.77i 22.19 ± 14.41h
190 10 41.13 ± 8.69l 11.61 ± 4.88o 3.67 ± 0.91l 3.35 ± 1.62p 62.95 ± 7.70l 61.93 ± 15.42m 42.3 ± 29.40ij
20 38.17 ± 6.69l 5.70 ± 0.50p 4.87 ± 0.28 k 1.18 ± 0.17q 65.63 ± 5.75l 81.20 ± 0.99l 80.50 ± 17.40i
30 21.35 ± 4.45m 3.11 ± 0.60pq 2.77 ± 0.25lm 1.11 ± 0.12q 80.79 ± 3.80k 89.70 ± 2.32kl 7.32 ± 6.32j
40 19.81 ± 2.11m 2.43 ± 0.13pq 2.67 ± 0.27lm 0.92 ± 0.10q 82.17 ± 1.72k 91.97 ± 0.23kl 9.97 ± 3.21j
50 12.31 ± 1.36m 0.00 ± 0.00q 2.05 ± 0.07m 0.00 ± 0.00q 88.91 ± 1.27k 100.00 ± 0.00k 23.96 ± 6.02j
200 10 33.23 ± 2.44n 8.10 ± 0.88r 3.20 ± 0.68n 2.64 ± 0.83r 70.04 ± 2.60o 73.21 ± 3.58p 21.89 ± 14.12k
20 17.33 ± 3.26o 2.42 ± 0.21s 2.30 ± 0.30n 1.06 ± 0.05s 84.38 ± 2.98n 92.01 ± 0.39o 15.17 ± 7.86k
30 13.76 ± 0.53op 2.32 ± 0.06s 2.26 ± 0.07n 1.03 ± 0.03s 87.60 ± 0.64mn 92.34 ± 0.10o 16.56 ± 1.54k
40 14.41 ± 1.86o 2.53 ± 0.45s 2.35 ± 0.60n 1.09 ± 0.09st 87.00 ± 1.85mn 91.61 ± 1.81o 22.29 ± 10.34k
50 8.56 ± 0.10p 0.00 ± 0.00t 2.13 ± 0.21n 0.00 ± 0.00t 92.29 ± 0.06m 100.00 ± 0.00n 21.37 ± 5.74k

1 Different letters in the same column represent statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). At least three replicate samples were analyzed. 2 Bold values indicate an increase in catechin concentration.

3.2. Roasting Kinetics of Monomeric Flavan-3-ols and TPC

The values obtained from the fitted parameters are given in Table 2. In the case of TPC and epicatechin, the k value increases from 0.02 ± 0.01 min−1 at 90 °C to 0.10 ± 0.05 min−1 at 200 °C, and from 0.02 ± 0.01 min−1 at 90 °C to 0.13 ± 0.04 min−1 at 200 °C, respectively. The kinetic parameters of the catechin are not shown because it corresponds to a combined production and degradation model, which does not correspond to Equations (2), (3), or (4).

Table 2.

First-order kinetic parameters fitted for TPC and epicatechin degradation.

Roasting Temperature (°C) TPC Epicatechin
k (min−1) R2 RMSE k (min−1) R2 RMSE
90 0.02 ± 0.01 0.52 18.50 0.02 ± 0.01 0.65 4.57
110 0.02 ± 0.01 0.70 13.97 0.03 ± 0.01 0.95 2.49
130 0.03 ± 0.02 0.87 13.08 0.03 ± 0.02 0.86 4.31
150 0.04 ± 0.03 0.83 14.59 0.06 ± 0.03 0.91 3.27
170 0.07 ± 0.03 0.96 2.24 0.07 ± 0.03 0.96 2.24
190 0.06 ± 0.03 0.92 11.35 0.09 ± 0.02 0.99 1.05
200 0.10 ± 0.05 0.96 9.23 0.13 ± 0.04 0.99 1.44

Figure 1 shows that the catechin reaction kinetics could be divided into two order models: one for formation and the other for degradation, where the highest catechin formation (84.90 ± 37.90%) was at 170 °C and 30 min of roasting.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kinetic of formation and degradation of catechin.

The temperature dependence of the TPC and epicatechin degradation was estimated using the Arrhenius equation expressed in Equation (5). The linear behavior of Ln k versus 1/T allowed us to determine Ea for TPC and epicatechin of 24.03 J/mol (R2 = 0.94) and 22.51 J/mol (R2 = 0.97), respectively (Figure 2). The parameters for catechin kinetics were not calculated because it presented a degradation and production pattern, as mentioned above.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Correlation of Ln k with 1/T to obtain the TPC and epicatechin kinetic parameters.

4. Discussion

The time and temperature of the roasting process depend on several factors, such as the type of cocoa (Criollo or Forastero) and others [42]. The main type of polyphenols (known for their demonstrated antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties) in cocoa is flavanols. This family of compounds includes catechin and epicatechin (monomeric species). Epicatechin is the most abundant flavanol in cocoa and accounts for 35% of the total polyphenolic fraction [43,44] (TPC). In one study made by Kim and Keeney [45], the epicatechin concentrations ranged from 2.66 (Jamaica) to 16.52 mg/g (Costa Rica) of the defatted sample in cocoa beans of different varieties. The epicatechin and catechin concentrations of the control sample were higher than those found by Kim and Keeney [45] and Payne et al. [32] in fermented cocoa beans (the Forastero variety) from Ivory Coast (epicatechin: 1.69 ± 0.10 mg/g; catechin: 0.08 ± 0.00 mg/g) and Papua New Guinea (epicatechin: 0.78 ± 0.04 mg/g; catechin: 0.05 ± 0.00 mg/g). These values were higher than those found by Mazor Jolić et al. [46] in Forastero cocoa beans from Ghana (epicatechin: 2.23 ± 0.6 mg/g; catechin: 0.28 ± 0.04 mg/g). Other studies conducted in Perú on fermented cocoa beans from Tingo María, San Alejandro, and Curimaná presented epicatechin and catechin concentrations of 0.33–5.04 mg/g and 0.02–0.14 mg/g, respectively [47]. It is known that epicatechin has diverse biological properties (antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and cardio-protective activity) [48]; thus, the Criollo cocoa beans used in the present study show potential for use in the elaboration of functional foods. It has been postulated that the ratio of epicatechin to catechin (epi/cat) possibly could be associated with the degree of cocoa processing [32,49]. Payne et al. [32] obtained epi/cat ratio values of 20.1 ± 0.63 for dry fermented cocoa beans and 3.35 ± 0.20 at 90 °C to 0.96 ± 0.02 at 120 °C for roasted beans. Table 1 shows control sample epi/cat ratio values of 11.20 ± 0.40; considering 50 min of roasting, values of 5.55 ± 1.24 at 90 °C to 2.36 ± 0.20 at 130 °C and 0.00 ± 0.00 at 200 °C were obtained. These results demonstrate that roasting at 200 °C at any time (10 or 50 min) is aggressive for epicatechin, so if these parameters are used, the functional properties of chocolate will be lost.

In Table 1, a roasting time of 50 min at 90, 110, 130, 150, 170, 190, and 200 °C degraded the TPC to 53.46 ± 7.29, 46.88 ± 6.30, 65.40 ± 3.16, 74.57 ± 1.37, 82.40 ± 0.89, 88.91 ± 1.27, and 92.29 ± 0.06, respectively; these results are consistent with those obtained by Mazor Jolić et al. [46]. The decrease of TPC is associated with the thermal and oxidative degradation of these compounds [35]. It was proven that, at high temperature, low molecular weight phenolic compounds easily volatilize [50]. Djikeng et al. [50] also observed that the degradation percentage of the TPC also increased with roasting time. In general, more intense roasting conditions result in a greater loss of TPC due to the high redox activity of polyphenols at those conditions [50,51]. Epicatechin degraded more than TPC at a higher temperature, obtaining a complete degradation at 200 °C and 50 min. This is concordant with Stanley et al. [5], who observed the significant effects of roasting time within temperatures up to 190 °C; the levels of epicatechin in Trinitario cocoa (a type of fine cocoa) decreased in a time- and temperature-dependent manner. Significant decreases in Criollo cocoa were observed. Among the monomeric flavan-3-ols, epicatechin was identified as the more active compound responsible for the vascular health benefits associated with cocoa and chocolate [52]. Applying treatments of 190–200 °C results in a total loss of epicatechin, and the healthy properties of the Criollo cacao and its aromatic properties may also be reduced; for this reason, Żyżelewicz et al. [1] and Hurst et al. [36] state that Criollo beans require milder roasting conditions. The roasting temperature is generally in the range from 110 to 120 °C.

The most important reactions occurring with catechins under thermal processing are epimerization, hydrolysis, oxidation, and polymerization; catechin epimerization takes place on two asymmetric carbon atoms in the C ring [53]. In Table 1, catechin shows a particular behavior due to the increase in its concentration (formation) at the beginning of the roasting. The catechin values in bold font shows an increase in its concentration with respect to the control sample (unroasted beans) during the first 10 min at 130 °C (11.46 ± 4.71%), and its formation continues until the first 10 min at 200 °C and subsequently degrades to 21.37 ± 5.74%. The trend of these results is consistent with those obtained by Stanley et al. [5], except that the catechin formation was much higher, showing an increase in catechin concentration 675% higher than the control (unroasted beans) at 10 min. These results were reported for Trinitario cocoa beans. We can affirm that, in Trinitario cacao, the formation of catechin is much greater than in Criollo cacao, and this applies to the epimerization of epicatechin to catechin [5,14,25,32,54]; however, as the treatment continued, its concentration decreased. These results were also found by Żyżelewicz et al. [4] in Forastero cocoa, since after 15 min of roasting at 135 °C, the content of catechin increased significantly, initiating its degradation. When cocoa beans are progressively roasted at conditions described as low, medium, and high roast conditions (160 °C at 13, 20, and 25 min), there is a progressive loss of epicatechin and an increase in catechin with higher roast levels [36,55]. The high temperature–short time (HTST) process induces higher epicatechin epimerization than does the low temperature–long-time (LTLT) process, generating greater amounts of catechin [16,53].

Cocoa consumption is suggested to promote health benefits. The amounts and profiles of monomeric flavanols depend strongly on the bean type, origin, and manufacturing process. Roasting is known as a crucial step in the technical treatment of cocoa, which leads to flavanol losses and modifications, especially the epimerization of epicatechin to catechin [42]. These modifications were fully produced (epimerization) at temperatures of 150, 170, and 190 °C (Table 1). In the manufacture of chocolate, it is necessary to achieve a balance that maintains healthy properties and the development of the aroma that characterizes fine, Criollo cocoa chocolates.

In order to explain the phenomena of TPC and epicatechin degradation, the data were fitted using kinetic models, which are pseudo first-order kinetic reactions coinciding with the majority of food reactions [56]. The term “pseudo” is added with respect to reactions in biological materials, such as food, because the actual reaction mechanism and its kinetics are far more complex [28]. We used seven temperatures in our experiment, allowing us to notice the behavior of the roasting process; when Taoukis et al. [56] states that five or six experimental temperatures are the practical optimum to obtain meaningfully narrow confidence limits in kinetic parameters (Ea and k). The values obtained from the fitted parameters in Matlab are given in Table 2 and consistent with previous studies [26,28,41,57], in which the first-order kinetic model explains both TPC and epicatechin degradation at all temperatures; the k value of epicatechin is higher than the k value of TPC. These results suggest that the degradation of epicatechin is faster than the degradation of TPC. Roasting conditions of 130 °C and 10 min produced a lower percentage of epicatechin (8.05 ± 3.01%) and TPC (10.98 ± 6.04%) degradation. Many authors claim that these compounds are degraded by heat [4,22,23,50]. The most intense temperatures have caused significant degradation of the components; however, it was found that the epicatechin is more thermosensitive than TPC. This is explained by the greater k value that epicatechin has compared to TPC; however, the chemical basis of this phenomenon must be studied.

Kinetic modeling may also use the influence of processing on critical quality parameters. Knowledge of degradation kinetics, including the reaction order, Ea and k, is of great importance to predict food quality loss during thermal process treatments [58]. Food quality loss reactions described by the kinetic models were shown to follow Arrhenius (Equation (5)) behavior with temperature changes [56]. The Ea for TPC was greater than the Ea for epicatechin, this being the minimal value of energy that a specific collision between reagent molecules must achieve in order for a reaction to take place [59]. The epicatechin thus needs less energy than TPC to degrade it. The relative differences in Ea values could be due to the different composition of the sample studied or to changes occurring in the samples during heating [58]. Olivares-Tenorio et al. [60] observed that catechin followed patterns of formation by epimerization and degradation, and experiments need to be devised to unravel these various reactions. Figure 1 shows that catechin reaction kinetics could be divided into a two order models: one for formation and the other for degradation, where the highest catechin formation was at 170 °C and 30 min (84.90 ± 37.90%), followed by treatments at 190 °C and 150 °C. The largest catechin formation occurs in the first 30 min of roasting at any of the aforementioned temperatures. The epimerization from epicatechin to catechin due to technological treatment (heat) has often been postulated. Only a few publications have confirmed this reaction by enantioseparation. The reaction mechanism is not fully clarified, but it is assumed that ring opening occurs at position C-2 of the oxygenated ring, and reclosing leads to the atypical enantiomers. High temperatures, particularly when combined with alkaline conditions, accelerate the epimerization reaction [42]. Figure 1 shows that at 90 and 110 °C there is only catechin degradation; subsequently, the formation of catechin begins slowly from 130 °C, reaching its highest point at 190 °C. The treatment at 200 °C only shows a degradation pattern. It is assumed that the k for catechin formation kinetics will be greater at 190 °C for 30 min, after which the degradation kinetics will take place at a high k. An enantoseparation reaction will occur to a greater extent for 30 min when the Criollo cocoa beans are roasted at 150, 170, or 190 °C.

5. Conclusions

The roasting process of Criollo cocoa allowed for a higher formation of catechin in the first 30 min of the process at 170 °C, followed by degradation to minimum levels at 200 °C, while the epicatechin showed greater susceptibility to treatment than the TPC and the catechin. Likewise, the degradation data of TPC and epicatechin are better suited to a first-order kinetic reaction as the temperature increases. Although it is true that the roasting stage is essential for the development of the aromas of chocolate, this also affects the polyphenolic content and monomeric flavan-3-ol of cocoa beans and thus the final chocolate product; therefore, roasting at moderate temperatures is necessary to obtain minimal degradation of cocoa phenolic compounds and consequently antioxidant properties. Likewise, with epicatechin being part of the total phenolic compounds, its degradation percentage is higher. This is explained by its kinetics; however, its chemical explanation for future work is pending.

Acknowledgments

A special acknowledgement to Multi-Service Cooperative APROCAM for the permission for the use of their facilities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.C.-A. and F.P.C.-T.; methodology, E.F.-R. and S.G.C.-Q.; software, E.M.C.-A.; formal analysis, E.M.C.-A. and F.P.C.-T.; investigation, E.F.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F.-R.; writing—review and editing, E.M.C.-A., R.S., and F.P.C.-T.; supervision, F.P.C.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Project N°16808-2016/PROYECTO-CACAO, of the Programa Nacional de Innovación Agraria (PNIA) of the Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria of the Peruvian Government, the Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, and the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Żyżelewicz D., Budryn G., Oracz J., Antolak H., Kręgiel D., Kaczmarska M. The effect on bioactive components and characteristics of chocolate by functionalization with raw cocoa beans. Food Res. Int. 2018;113:234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castro-Alayo E.M., Idrogo-Vásquez G., Siche R., Cardenas-Toro F.P. Formation of aromatic compounds precursors during fermentation of Criollo and Forastero cocoa. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01157. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ascrizzi R., Flamini G., Tessieri C., Pistelli L. From the raw seed to chocolate: Volatile profile of Blanco de Criollo in different phases of the processing chain. Microchem. J. 2017;133:474–479. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2017.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Żyżelewicz D., Krysiak W., Oracz J., Sosnowska D., Budryn G., Nebesny E. The influence of the roasting process conditions on the polyphenol content in cocoa beans, nibs and chocolates. Food Res. Int. 2016;89:918–929. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stanley T.H., Van Buiten C.B., Baker S.A., Elias R.J., Anantheswaran R.C., Lambert J.D. Impact of roasting on the flavan-3-ol composition, sensory-related chemistry, and in vitro pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of cocoa beans. Food Chem. 2018;255:414–420. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oracz J., Nebesny E. Influence of roasting conditions on the biogenic amine content in cocoa beans of different Theobroma cacao cultivars. Food Res. Int. 2014;55:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.10.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu Y., Pan Z.J., Liao W., Li J., Gruget P., Kitts D.D., Lu X. Determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of chocolate by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transformed-infrared spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2016;202:254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sacchetti G., Ioannone F., De Gregorio M., Di Mattia C., Serafini M., Mastrocola D. Non enzymatic browning during cocoa roasting as affected by processing time and temperature. J. Food Eng. 2016;169:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nascimento M.M., Santos H.M., Coutinho J.P., Lôbo I.P., da Silva Junior A.L.S., Santos A.G., de Jesus R.M. Optimization of chromatographic separation and classification of artisanal and fine chocolate based on its bioactive compound content through multivariate statistical techniques. Microchem. J. 2020;152:104342. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Steinberg F.M., Bearden M.M., Keen C.L. Cocoa and chocolate flavonoids: Implications for cardiovascular health. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2003;103:215–223. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Do Carmo Brito B.D.N., Campos Chisté R., Da Silva Pena R., Abreu Gloria M.B., Santos Lopes A. Bioactive amines and phenolic compounds in cocoa beans are affected by fermentation. Food Chem. 2017;228:484–490. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alean J., Chejne F., Rojano B. Degradation of polyphenols during the cocoa drying process. J. Food Eng. 2016;189:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y., Feltham B.A., Suh M., Jones P.J.H. Cocoa flavanols and blood pressure reduction: Is there enough evidence to support a health claim in the United States? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;83:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alañón M.E., Castle S.M., Siswanto P.J., Cifuentes-Gómez T., Spencer J.P.E. Assessment of flavanol stereoisomers and caffeine and theobromine content in commercial chocolates. Food Chem. 2016;208:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fayeulle N., Vallverdu-Queralt A., Meudec E., Hue C., Boulanger R., Cheynier V., Sommerer N. Characterization of new flavan-3-ol derivatives in fermented cocoa beans. Food Chem. 2018;259:207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ioannone F., Di Mattia C.D., De Gregorio M., Sergi M., Serafini M., Sacchetti G. Flavanols, proanthocyanidins and antioxidant activity changes during cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) roasting as affected by temperature and time of processing. Food Chem. 2015;174:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Krysiak W. Influence of roasting conditions on coloration of roasted cocoa beans. J. Food Eng. 2006;77:449–453. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Andres-Lacueva C., Monagas M., Khan N., Izquierdo-Pulido M., Urpi-Sarda M., Permanyer J., Lamuela-Raventós R.M. Flavanol and Flavonol Contents of Cocoa Powder Products: Influence of the Manufacturing Process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56:3111–3117. doi: 10.1021/jf0728754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martín M.A., Ramos S. Cocoa polyphenols in oxidative stress: Potential health implications. J. Funct. Foods. 2016;27:570–588. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martín M.Á., Ramos S. Health beneficial effects of cocoa phenolic compounds: A mini-review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017;14:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.12.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Della Pelle F., Blandón-Naranjo L., Alzate M., Del Carlo M., Compagnone D. Cocoa powder and catechins as natural mediators to modify carbon-black based screen-printed electrodes. Application to free and total glutathione detection in blood. Talanta. 2020;207:120349. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hii C.L., Menon A.S., Chiang C.L., Sharif S. Kinetics of hot air roasting of cocoa nibs and product quality. J. Food Process Eng. 2017;40:e12467. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12467. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Afoakwa E. Roasting effects on phenolic content and free radical scavening actiivities of pulp preconditioned and fermented (Theobroma cacao) beans. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2015;15:9635–9650. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Durme J., Ingels I., De Winne A. Inline roasting hyphenated with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry as an innovative approach for assessment of cocoa fermentation quality and aroma formation potential. Food Chem. 2016;205:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hu S., Kim B.-Y., Baik M.-Y. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant capacity of raw, roasted and puffed cacao beans. Food Chem. 2016;194:1089–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Teh Q.T.M., Tan G.L.Y., Loo S.M., Azhar F.Z., Menon A.S., Hii C.L. The Drying Kinetics and Polyphenol Degradation of Cocoa Beans: Cocoa Drying and Polyphenol Degradation. J. Food Process Eng. 2016;39:484–491. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hii C.L., Law C.L., Cloke M., Suzannah S. Thin layer drying kinetics of cocoa and dried product quality. Biosyst. Eng. 2009;102:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kyi T.M., Daud W.R.W., Mohammad A.B., Wahid Samsudin M., Kadhum A.A.H., Talib M.Z.M. The kinetics of polyphenol degradation during the drying of Malaysian cocoa beans. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2005;40:323–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.00959.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Summa C., Raposo F.C., McCourt J., Scalzo R.L., Wagner K.-H., Elmadfa I., Anklam E. Effect of roasting on the radical scavenging activity of cocoa beans. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006;222:368–375. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0005-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jonfia-Essien W.A., West G., Alderson P.G., Tucker G. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of hybrid variety cocoa beans. Food Chem. 2008;108:1155–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Singleton V., Orthofer R., Lamuela-Raventos R. Methods in Enzymology. Academic Press; Cambridge, UK: 1999. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin Ciocalteau reagent; pp. 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Payne M.J., Hurst W.J., Miller K.B., Rank C., Stuart D.A. Impact of Fermentation, Drying, Roasting, and Dutch Processing on Epicatechin and Catechin Content of Cacao Beans and Cocoa Ingredients. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:10518–10527. doi: 10.1021/jf102391q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Boekel M.A.J.S., Tijskens L.M.M. Food Process Modelling. Woodhead Publishing Limited; Cambridge, UK: 2001. Kinetic modelling; pp. 35–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rabeler F., Feyissa A.H. Kinetic Modeling of Texture and Color Changes During Thermal Treatment of Chicken Breast Meat. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018;11:1495–1504. doi: 10.1007/s11947-018-2123-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.García-Alamilla P., Lagunes-Gálvez L.M., Barajas-Fernández J., García-Alamilla R. Physicochemical Changes of Cocoa Beans during Roasting Process. J. Food Qual. 2017;2017:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2017/2969324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hurst W.J., Krake S.H., Bergmeier S.C., Payne M.J., Miller K.B., Stuart D.A. Impact of fermentation, drying, roasting and Dutch processing on flavan-3-ol stereochemistry in cacao beans and cocoa ingredients. Chem. Cent. J. 2011;5:53. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-5-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baghdadi Y.M., Hii C.L. Mass transfer kinetics and effective diffusivities during cocoa roasting. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2017;12:127–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Menon A.S., Hii C.L., Law C.L., Shariff S., Djaeni M. Effects of drying on the production of polyphenol-rich cocoa beans. Dry. Technol. 2017;35:1799–1806. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2016.1276072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang H., Helliwell K., You X. Isocratic elution system for the determination of catechins, caffeine and gallic acid in green tea using HPLC. Food Chem. 2000;68:115–121. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00179-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Martins L.M., Sant’Ana A.S., Iamanaka B.T., Berto M.I., Pitt J.I., Taniwaki M.H. Kinetics of aflatoxin degradation during peanut roasting. Food Res. Int. 2017;97:178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Molaveisi M., Beigbabaei A., Akbari E., Noghabi M.S., Mohamadi M. Kinetics of temperature effect on antioxidant activity, phenolic compounds and color of Iranian jujube honey. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01129. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kothe L., Zimmermann B.F., Galensa R. Temperature influences epimerization and composition of flavanol monomers, dimers and trimers during cocoa bean roasting. Food Chem. 2013;141:3656–3663. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wollgast J., Anklam E. Review on polyphenols in Theobroma cacao: Changes in composition during the manufacture of chocolate and methodology for identification and quantification. Food Res. Int. 2000;33:423–447. doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00068-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Quelal-Vásconez M.A., Lerma-García M.J., Pérez-Esteve É., Arnau-Bonachera A., Barat J.M., Talens P. Changes in methylxanthines and flavanols during cocoa powder processing and their quantification by near-infrared spectroscopy. LWT. 2020;117:108598. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim H., Keeney P.G. (-)-Epicatechin Content in Fermented and Unfermented Cocoa Beans. J. Food Sci. 1984;49:1090–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb10400.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mazor Jolić S., Radojčić Redovniković I., Marković K., Ivanec Šipušić Đ., Delonga K. Changes of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity in cocoa beans processing: Changes of phenolic in cocoa beans processing. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011;46:1793–1800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02670.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Peláez P., Bardón I., Camasca P. Methylxanthine and catechin content of fresh and fermented cocoa beans, dried cocoa beans, and cocoa liquor. Sci. Agropecu. 2016;7:355–365. doi: 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2016.04.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Prakash M., Basavaraj B.V., Chidambara Murthy K.N. Biological functions of epicatechin: Plant cell to human cell health. J. Funct. Foods. 2019;52:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.10.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Miller K.B., Hurst W.J., Flannigan N., Ou B., Lee C.Y., Smith N., Stuart D.A. Survey of Commercially Available Chocolate- and Cocoa-Containing Products in the United States. 2. Comparison of Flavan-3-ol Content with Nonfat Cocoa Solids, Total Polyphenols, and Percent Cacao. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:9169–9180. doi: 10.1021/jf901821x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Djikeng F.T., Teyomnou W.T., Tenyang N., Tiencheu B., Morfor A.T., Touko B.A.H., Houketchang S.N., Boungo G.T., Karuna M.S.L., Ngoufack F.Z., et al. Effect of traditional and oven roasting on the physicochemical properties of fermented cocoa beans. Heliyon. 2018;4:e00533. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suazo Y., Davidov-Pardo G., Arozarena I. Effect of Fermentation and Roasting on the Phenolic Concentration and Antioxidant Activity of Cocoa from Nicaragua: Effect of Process on Cocoa from Nicaragua. J. Food Qual. 2014;37:50–56. doi: 10.1111/jfq.12070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schroeter H., Heiss C., Balzer J., Kleinbongard P., Keen C.L., Hollenberg N.K., Sies H., Kwik-Uribe C., Schmitz H.H., Kelm M. (-)-Epicatechin mediates beneficial effects of flavanol-rich cocoa on vascular function in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:1024–1029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510168103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lončarić A., Pablo Lamas J., Guerra E., Kopjar M., Lores M. Thermal stability of catechin and epicatechin upon disaccharides addition. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018;53:1195–1202. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.13696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bernatova I. Biological activities of (−)-epicatechin and (−)-epicatechin-containing foods: Focus on cardiovascular and neuropsychological health. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018;36:666–681. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Oracz J., Nebesny E., Żyżelewicz D. Changes in the flavan-3-ols, anthocyanins, and flavanols composition of cocoa beans of different Theobroma cacao L. groups affected by roasting conditions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015;241:663–681. doi: 10.1007/s00217-015-2494-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Taoukis P.S., Labuza T.P., Saguy I.S. Handbook of Food Engineering Practice. CRC Press; New York, NY, USA: 1997. Kinetics of Food Deterioration and Shelf-Life Prediction; pp. 366–408. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Henríquez C., Córdova A., Almonacid S., Saavedra J. Kinetic modeling of phenolic compound degradation during drum-drying of apple peel by-products. J. Food Eng. 2014;143:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.06.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Turturică M., Stănciuc N., Bahrim G., Râpeanu G. Effect of thermal treatment on phenolic compounds from plum (prunus domestica) extracts—A kinetic study. J. Food Eng. 2016;171:200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Garvín A., Ibarz R., Ibarz A. Kinetic and thermodynamic compensation. A current and practical review for foods. Food Res. Int. 2017;96:132–153. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Olivares-Tenorio M.-L., Verkerk R., van Boekel M.A.J.S., Dekker M. Thermal stability of phytochemicals, HMF and antioxidant activity in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) J. Funct. Foods. 2017;32:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antioxidants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES