Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;12(2):439. doi: 10.3390/nu12020439

Table 2.

Studies on taurolidine and ethanol lock for the prevention of CRBSI in adults receiving home parenteral nutrition.

Author, Year Study Design Antimicrobial Solutions Patients (N) Study Years Follow-Up
Duration
Results
Bisseling et al., 2010 [57] RCT TL 2% vs. HL 30 2006–2008 HL: 353 ± 51 days
TL: 336 ± 51 days
(mean)
HL: 2.02 (1.1–3.8) CRBSI/1000 days
TL: 0.19 (0.003–1.3) CRBSI/1000 days
(p = 0.008)
Liu et al., 2013 [60] M-A TL 2% vs. HL 431 2004–2013 In total, 31 to 349 days RR of CRBSI: 0.34 (0.21–0.55; p < 0.0001)
Klek et al., 2015 a [58] RCT TL 2% vs. TL 1.35% + citrate vs. saline 30 2012–2013 In total, 12 months TL 2%: 0 CRBSI / 1000 days
TL 1.35% + citrate: 0.273 CRBSI / 1000 days
Saline: 0 CRBSI / 1000 days
(p = 1.00)
Wouters et al., 2018 [59] RCT TL 2% vs. saline 0.9% 85 2013–2015 TL: 363 (119–370) days/patient
Saline: 346 (109–368)
days/patient
(median)
TL: 0.33 (0.11–0.76) CRBSI/1000 days
Saline: 1.44 (0.85–2.23) CRBSI/1000 days
Relative risk: 0.23 (0.07–0.63)
(p = 0.002)
Tribler et al., 2017 [63] RCT TL 1.35% + citrate + heparin vs. HL 41 2013–2014 TL: 592 (10–756) days/patient
HL: 207 (25–755) days/patient
TL: 0 CRBSI/1000 days
HL: 1 (0.4–2.07) CRBSI/1000 days
(p = 0.0052)
Reitzel et al., 2019 [6] M-A TLb vs. EL 70% 713 2012–2019 - Pre-TL: 0–6.58 CLABSI/1000 days
TL: 0–1.1 CLABSI/1000 days
Pre-EL: 0.32–12.7 CLABSI/1000 days.
EL: 0.47–2.4 CLABSI/1000 days
John et al., 2012 [51] Retrospective
cohort
EL 31 2006–2009 Total of 34 411 catheter days
27 210 catheter days before EL
7201 catheter days after EL introduction
Pre-EL: 3.53 CRBSI/1000 days
Post-EL: 1.65 CRBSI/1000 days
(p= 0.011)
Zhang et al., 2019 [53] M-A EL vs. HL 615 2008–2017 - OR: 0.53 (0.34–0.82; p = 0.004)

RCT: randomized controlled trial; M-A: Meta-analysis; TL: taurolidine lock; EL: ethanol lock; HL: heparin lock; RR: risk ratio; OR: odds ratio, CRBSI: catheter-related bloodstream infection, CLABSI: central line-associated bloodstream infection. a The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical value of taurolidine in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition with a low infection rate. b Concentrations of taurolidine and/or citrate varied between studies.