Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of axonal myelin in several areas of the central nervous system (CNS) that is responsible for clinical symptoms such as muscle spasms, optic neuritis, and paralysis. The progress made in more than one decade of research in animal models of MS for clarifying the pathophysiology of MS disease validated the concept that MS is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder caused by the recruitment in the CNS of self-reactive lymphocytes, mainly CD4+ T cells. Indeed, high levels of T helper (Th) cells and related cytokines and chemokines have been found in CNS lesions and in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients, thus contributing to the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), the activation of resident astrocytes and microglia, and finally the outcome of neuroinflammation. To date, several types of Th cells have been discovered and designated according to the secreted lineage-defining cytokines. Interestingly, Th1, Th17, Th1-like Th17, Th9, and Th22 have been associated with MS. In this review, we discuss the role and interplay of different Th cell subpopulations and their lineage-defining cytokines in modulating the inflammatory responses in MS and the approved as well as the novel therapeutic approaches targeting T lymphocytes in the treatment of the disease.
Keywords: multiple sclerosis, inflammation, T helper cells, immunotherapy
1. Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) affecting about 2–3 million people worldwide that is triggered by both environmental and genetic factors [1,2]. About 15–30% of patients with MS present the relapsing-remitting (RR) clinical course, which is characterized by acute episodes of neurological dysfunctions, such as optic neuritis, sensory disturbances, or motor impairments, usually followed by periods of recovery or remission [3]. After variable periods of time, about 50% of RRMS patients progress to a chronic secondary progressive (SP) clinical stage that is characterized by steadily worsening disability [4]. In about 15% of patients, MS is progressive from the onset and is called primary progressive (PP)MS, a clinical course characterized by a gradual and constant decline in neurological functions [5].
The pathological hallmarks of MS are the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), oligodendrocyte loss, demyelination, astrocytes gliosis, and axonal degeneration [6,7]. Inflammation is present at all stages, and pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines play a critical role in the pathophysiology of MS by compromising the BBB, recruiting immune cells from the periphery and activating resident microglia. Microglia activation is thought one of the early events in the development of MS lesions. Activated microglia, indeed, may further contribute to disease progression by secreting inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and by releasing reactive oxygen species and glutamate [8]. Conversion of MS from RR to the progressive phase has also been related to prolonged chronic inflammation in the CNS. Moreover, both SPMS and PPMS patients have generalized inflammation in the whole brain accompanied by cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury [9]. Although every cell type of the innate and adaptive immune system may orchestrate the inflammatory response within the CNS, a significant and important contribution is exerted by autoreactive CD4+ T cells. Autoreactive CD4+ T cells likely activated in the peripheral lymph nodes migrate into the CNS [10,11,12,13,14] where they are locally reactivated and secrete cytokines and chemokines that modulate the inflammatory lesions typical of MS [15]. For instance, the strongest genetic risk factor for MS is human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB*15:01, a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II allele involved in the presentation of self-peptides to CD4+ T cells [16]. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed and comprehensive description of the role of different CD4+ T helper (Th) cell subsets in the pathophysiology of MS and the current therapeutic approaches targeting T-cell mediated responses. The role of regulatory T (Treg) cells in suppressing the functions of autoreactive Th cells in MS is also briefly discussed.
2. Th Cell Subsets
CD4+ Th cells are central regulators of the adaptive immune response against a wide variety of microbes by helping B lymphocytes to produce antibodies (Ab) and by secreting specific cytokines that provide efficient protection against pathogens. Distinct Th cell subsets, producing one or more lineage-defining cytokines and expressing master transcription factors and homing receptors, differentiate from naïve CD4+ T cells in response to a specific class of pathogenic microorganisms and to the cytokine milieu. Naïve CD4+ T cells are activated in peripheral lymph nodes by mature dendritic cells that present pathogen-derived peptides associated to class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and together with costimulatory molecules promote T cell proliferation and produce polarizing cytokines, which in turn orchestrate T cell differentiation in distinct Th cell subsets, such as Th1, Th2, Th17, Th22, and Th9 [17,18]. In addition to their protective role against pathogens, specific Th cell subsets exert a crucial role in MS pathogenesis as detailed below.
2.1. Th1 Cells
Th1 cells were identified in the late 1980s [19,20] as a subset of CD4+ T cells that orchestrate efficient adaptive immune responses against intracellular pathogens by secreting interferon (IFN)-γ that activates macrophages to kill intracellular microbes and promotes the production of opsonizing Abs [17]. Th1 may be identified by the surface expression of the CXC chemokine receptor type 3 (CXCR3), and interleukin (IL)-12 receptor (IL-12R) chains β1/β2, together with the intracytoplasmic expression of the master transcription factor T-bet [21]. IL-12 and IFN-γ cooperate for inducing the expression of T-bet that in turn induce additional IFN-γ and T-bet expression, thus amplifying Th1 polarization [22,23]. Initial studies performed in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) animal model of MS revealed a pivotal role of Th1 cells in the pathogenesis of MS. Indeed, IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells were found as the most frequent Th cell subset in the CNS of EAE animals [24,25]. IFN-γ was abundant in CNS lesions of EAE [26] and in active lesions of MS patients [27], and the adoptive transfer of Th1 cells was sufficient to induce EAE in recipient mice [28,29]. These data together with the initial findings that the administration of IFN-γ to MS patients exacerbated disease [30,31] supported an important role of IL-12/IFN-γ axis and Th1 cells in both EAE and MS pathogenesis. Although the neuropathological role of infiltrated Th1 cells into the CNS is not fully elucidated, several evidences suggest microglia as the major cellular targets of Th1 cells. Microglia are CNS resident macrophages that, depending on the nature of exogenous stimuli, may differentiate into inflammatory M1-like or anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotypes [32]. Th1 cells produce several effector molecules that activate resident microglia and trigger their differentiation into the inflammatory and neurotoxic M1-like phenotype [33,34]. Moreover, Th1 cells also favor the upregulation of class II MHC and costimulatory molecules on microglia, thus favoring the reactivation of infiltrated Th cells and their further differentiation [34].
However, further observations that mice deficient in IL-12p35 subunit [35,36] or IL-12Rβ2 chain [37] or IFN-γ [38] were susceptible to EAE together with data showing that the administration of IL-12 during the early phases the disease suppressed EAE in an IFN-γ-dependent manner [35], undermined the paradigm that Th1 cells were the main pathogenic cell subset in EAE and MS. Finally, the discovery that IL-23 shares the p40 subunit with IL-12 [39] and IL-23R comprises the IL-12Rβ1 chain [40] clarified these contradictory data and defined the role of IL-23 in favoring EAE by driving and inducing the expansion of Th17 cells, a subset of Th cells producing IL-17 [41,42,43].
2.2. Th17 Cells
Th17 cells have been identified in 2005 [41] as an important subset of CD4+ Th cells that mediates efficient immune responses against extracellular bacteria and fungi [44]. Th17 cells may be identified on the basis of specific surface markers such as CD161, the chemokine receptors CCR6 and CCR4, the cytokine receptors IL-23R and IL-1R [45], the intracytoplasmic expression of retinoic acid receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor γτ (RORγτ), and the production of specific cytokines, such as IL-17A-F, IL-21, and IL-22 [46]. In particular, IL-17A and IL-17F act on several cell types like macrophages, epithelial, and endothelial cells by inducing the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and promoting the recruitment of neutrophils in inflammatory sites [47,48]. IL-21 provides a positive-feedback loop for successful amplification of the Th17 cell subset [49], and IL-22 acts on epithelial cells favoring the production of antimicrobial peptides and mucus [50]. The result of these actions is the promotion of host defense against pathogens but also tissue damage that may lead to chronic inflammatory diseases [51]. Notably, Th17 cells are involved in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases including MS [52], where they critically contribute to the disruption of the BBB [53] and by targeting resident astrocytes and microglia within the CNS promote their activation and amplify neuroinflammation in EAE [33,54] (Figure 1). In particular, Th17 cells are highly effective in regulating astrocytes rather than microglia. Astrocytes are CNS resident cells with distinct anatomical locations and both morphological and functional properties. They are positioned at the interface between the BBB and neurons and regulate the movement of molecules and cells between circulation and CNS. Moreover, by producing neurotrophic factors they also regulate neurogenesis and tissue repair. In response to CNS injury, astrocytes undergo profound morphological and functional changes, a phenomenon known as astrogliosis [55]. Astrocytes express a functional IL-17 receptor A that is further upregulated in EAE [56]. IL-17 has been described to upregulate the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [57], and the impairment of IL-17-mediated signaling in astrocytes has been described to ameliorate EAE [58]. Consistently, Th17 cells, in cooperation with Th1, have been shown to regulate the functions of astrocytes by inducing the downregulation of neurotrophic factors and the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [54,59]. Other proposed pathological functions of Th17 cells and IL-17 include the inhibition of both maturation and survival of oligodendrocytes (OLs) [60] as well as their apoptosis [61]. OLs are myelinating glial cells of the CNS during development and throughout adulthood. In MS, persistent demyelination and neurodegeneration are associated with dysfunction and apoptosis of OLs caused by direct cytotoxicity from antigen-specific T cells and autoantibodies as well as by T cell-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokines that activate resident microglia [62].
During the past years, several studies in EAE mice [15,41,63] together with the immunological evaluation of MS patients evidenced a pivotal role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of MS [42,43,64,65]. High levels of IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells have been found in the peripheral blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of RRMS patients during relapses [65,66,67] and in MS patients with active disease [68]. Moreover, the preferential expansion of Th17 cells has been correlated with the number of active plaques on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [69] and with disease progression [70]. IL-17A in combination with IL-6 has been also described to promote the breakdown of BBB in RRMS patients [71] by altering the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells [72,73] and favoring the depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton near the tight junctions [74]. For instance, human Th17 cells exhibit an increased migratory capacity in RRMS patients with high disease severity and inflammatory lesions [75].
Several key transcription factors, the most reliable RORγτ [76] and STAT3 [77,78], and cytokines such as IL-6, transforming growth factor (TGF)β, IL-21, IL-1β and IL-23, have been described to promote IL-17 expression and Th17 cell differentiation in both human and mouse [18,45,79,80,81]. In the mouse system, the differentiation of Th17 cells is promoted by TGFβ in combination with either IL-6 or IL-21 or IL-1β [82,83]. In the human system, some research groups suggested that IL-1β and IL-23 can supply for TGFβ functions in inducing human Th17 cell differentiation [84,85,86,87]. Others evidenced a pivotal role of TGFβ in combination with IL-6, IL-1β IL-23, or IL-21 for inducing the expression of RORγτ and Th17 cell differentiation [88,89,90]. In human, but not in mouse [91], CD28, an important co-stimulatory molecule expressed on T cells [92,93] and involved in the regulation of both tolerance and autoimmunity [94], has been also described to stimulate CD4+ T cells to produce inflammatory cytokines and chemokines related to the Th17 cell phenotype [95,96] and to enhance the inflammatory response in MS by reprogramming T cell metabolism and favoring the expression of Th17-associated cytokines [97,98].
Th17 cells exhibit high plasticity and may adopt different functional profiles depending on the inflammatory or anti-inflammatory environments [99]. Th17 cells can differentiate into high pathogenic Th1-like Th17 cells expressing high levels of IFN-γ (see below) or in non-pathogenic IL-10-producing Treg cells. Both Th17 and Treg cells, indeed, share some common features, such as the expression of CD49b and the transcription factor aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), likely due to the common TGF-β requirement for their differentiation [100,101]. In this contest, Gagliani et al. showed in mice that, during the resolution of inflammation, Th17 cells undergo a transcriptional reprogramming leading to their differentiation into Treg cells in the presence of TGF-β and in an AhR-dependent manner [102]. The high plasticity of Th17 cells was also recently evidenced in MS by Capone et al., who showed that human Th17 cells polarized from the naïve CD4+ T cells as well as from peripheral blood Th17 cells of RRMS patients display distinct inflammatory features compared to healthy donors. In particular, Th17 cells from RRMS patients upregulate the expression of IL-1R and produce higher levels of IL-21, IL-2, and TNF-β thus leading to the acquisition of a more pathogenic profile [103]. Consistently, elevated expression of IFN-γ and CXCR3 together with reduced expression of anti-inflammatory IL-10 was found in Th17 cells from clinically active compared to stable MS patients [104]. Th17 cells also produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), another cytokine that has been suggested to play a critical role in the pathogenicity of Th17 cells in EAE models [52]. Moreover, the percentage of IL-17A and GM-CSF co-producing cells were enriched in the CSF of RRMS [105] and increased during relapse [106]. Th17 cells have been also shown to produce IL-22 [50], a cytokine that raises pro-inflammatory innate defense mechanisms in epithelial cells [107,108] and that, together with other cytokines of the Th17 signature, has been involved in several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [109,110].
2.3. Th1-Like Th17 Cells
Recently, a novel Th1 cell subset known as Th1-like Th17 cells that produce both IFN-γ and IL-17 has been identified in both human and mice [111,112]. These cells express IL-23R and co-express CXCR3 and T-bet together with CCR6 and RORγτ, produce lower amounts of IL-17A compared to classical Th17 cells but high levels of IFN-γ [45]. The origin of Th1-like Th17 cells is not fully defined but several studies support the notion that these cells derive from Th17 cells in the presence of IL-12, TNF-α and/or, IL-1β [113,114,115]. In mice, the higher pathogenicity of Th1-like Th17 cells compared to Th17 cells was associated with the production of several inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as GM-CSF, IL-22, CC chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4), and CXCR3 [116]. These data were also confirmed in the human system, by the analysis of the transcriptional profile of peripheral blood Th17 cells and Th1-like Th17 cells in MS [104]. Recent data from single-cell transcriptome analysis performed in EAE extended these data by showing that the differentiation of Th1-like Th17 cells in the CNS from Th17 precursors in the lymph nodes was governed by four specific genes, Gpr65, Toso, Plzp, and Cd5l, which were also involved in disease susceptibility [117].
The participation of highly pathogenic Th1-like Th17 cells in neuroinflammation has been evidenced by studies in both EAE and MS [118]. For instance, Th1-like Th17 cells were capable to cross the BBB and accumulate in the CNS of acute EAE and were also found in brain tissues from MS patients [119] and upregulated in RRMS patients during relapse [120]. Myelin-specific Th1-like Th17 cells increased in both peripheral blood and CSF of patients with MS [121,122] and Th17.1 cells, a Th1-like Th17 subpopulation expressing high levels of IFN-γ, GM-CSF, very late antigen 4 (VLA-4), and low levels of IL-17, have been associated with the disease activity in RRMS patients [123]. The neuropathic effects of Th1-like Th17 cells within CNS are still being elucidated but likely overlap with those identified for Th1 and Th17 cells (Figure 1).
2.4. Th22 Cells
Discovered in 2000 [124], IL-22 is produced by Th17 cells and by a unique CD4+ Th cell subset, named Th22 [125,126,127]. Other cellular sources of IL-22 include natural killer (NK) cells [128,129], ILC3 subset of innate lymphoid cells, and, at a lower extent, other leucocytes including macrophages [130]. IL-22 is a member of the IL-10 family and its main effects are exerted in non-hematopoietic cells, such as epithelial cells. IL-22, indeed, stimulates the regeneration and proliferation of epithelial cells and promotes the production of antimicrobial peptide required for epithelial barrier functions and protection against extracellular pathogens [131].
Although the role of IL-22 in MS has not yet been fully elucidated, emerging evidence suggest the involvement of IL-22 in MS immunopathogenesis. Initial studies from Kebir et al. evidenced the upregulation of IL-22R in the brains of MS patients and the role of IL-22 in synergy with IL-17A in disrupting the integrity of BBB tight junctions by reducing the expression of occludin in endothelial cells [71]. More recent data showed higher levels of IL-22 in the serum of relapsing MS compared to healthy donors [106,132,133,134] and a decrease of IL-22 was observed during the recovery phase of acute EAE [135]. The number of IL-22-producing cells also increased in both peripheral blood [136] and CSF [105] of RRMS patients who were resistant to IFN-β therapy [136]. Due to high levels of expression of CCR6, which is required for the migration into the CNS, myelin-specific IL-22-producing cells can synergize with Th17 cells, thus contributing to break the BBB and initiate the autoimmune response against components of the CNS myelin [71]. For instance, myelin-specific IL-17- and IL-22-producing CD4+ T cells resistant to corticoids have been associated with active brain lesions in MS patients [134]. Moreover, IL-22R expression was found in human brains and co-localized with IL-22 in the brain tissue sections of MS patients, in particular in the plaques and predominantly on astrocytes [133], which may increase the permeability of the BBB by secreting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [55]. Interestingly, recent studies suggest a role of IL-22 and IL-22-producing cells in regulating the survival and activity of both OLs and astrocytes in MS [133,137] (Figure 1). Finally, the identification of single nucleotide polymorphism of IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP, also called IL-2RA), an antagonist of IL-22, as an MS risk gene [138,139] supports a role of IL-22-producing cells in the immunopathogenesis of MS.
2.5. Th9 Cells
Over the past decade, a distinct subset of effector CD4+ T cells characterized by the production of IL-9 has been defined. Although IL-9 was initially associated with a Th2 response, more recent studies redefined IL-9-producing CD4+ T cells as Th9 cells [140,141]. The role of Th9 cells in MS has been largely investigated in the mouse model of EAE. The first study compared the encephalitogenic activity of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-specific Th9, Th17, and Th1 cells in an EAE model of adoptive transfer. The results revealed that Th9 cell recipients possessed fewer infiltrates of lymphocytes in the meninges compared to EAE developed by Th1 and Th17 cells, thus suggesting that the mechanisms of EAE induction by Th9 cells differed from the mechanisms of Th1 and Th17 cells [142]. Further studies performed in knockout mice reported contrasting results. In fact, mice lacking IL-9R exhibited a more severe course of EAE, suggesting a regulatory role of the cytokine in controlling pathogenic mechanisms of immune responses [143]. Consistently, in EAE, IL-9 was reported as an anti-inflammatory cytokine produced by nonpathogenic Th17 cells concomitantly to IL-10 [144]. On the other side, other groups found that IL-9 neutralization and IL-9R deficiency attenuated EAE [145,146].
In the human system, Ruocco et al. analyzed the effect of IL-9 in MS by correlating the levels of IL-9 in the CSF of 107 RRMS patients at the diagnosis and during the course of disease. Interestingly, they found that IL-9 levels in the CSF of RRMS patients inversely correlated with indexes of inflammatory activity, neurodegeneration, and progression of MS-associated disability [147]. A previous study in MS patients showed that IL-9 levels in the CSF were lower during clinical relapses and increased following prednisolone treatment, thus supporting the role of IL-9 in the maintenance of the remission phase in MS [148]. These results suggest the presence of Th9 cells in the CNS of MS patients, where IL-9 could exert a protective role in MS disease by reducing the levels of IL-17 produced by Th17 cells [147] and the expression of the mitochondrial pro-apoptotic factor Bax [149], thus enhancing neuronal survival in organotypic human brain slice cultures [150]. Considering the contrasting results reported on the contribution of Th9 cells and IL-9 to either MS or EAE, further studies are required to clarify the role of Th9 cells in MS pathogenesis.
3. Treg Cells
The development of autoimmunity is finely regulated by specific subsets of T cells that modulate immune responses by keeping pathogenic Th cells under control. Treg cells were firstly identified in 1995 by Sakaguchi et al. as a CD4+CD25+ T cell subset able to suppress effector inflammatory T cells and to maintain self-tolerance [151]. In the last two decades, progress has been made to better characterize Treg cells in the context of autoimmune diseases and at least two main subsets of CD4+ Treg cells have been identified: natural nTreg cells that develop in the thymus following the recognition of self-antigens and express the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) [152] and inducible iTreg cells that generate from naïve CD4+ T cells under specific conditions of antigen-stimulation and in the presence of a particular cytokine milieu. iTreg comprises different subsets including FoxP3+ Treg, type 1 regulatory (Tr1) T cells producing high levels of IL-10 and Th3 cells producing TGF-β [153]. In humans, circulating iTreg also exhibit high levels of phenotypic heterogeneity strictly related to their differentiation stage and immunosuppressive functions [154].
Alterations in both number and suppressive functions of distinct Treg subsets have been reported in MS, especially in RRMS patients [155,156], and most of the approved disease-modifying drugs for RRMS also exert positive effects on Treg cells [154].
4. T Cell Targeting Therapy
The relevant contribution of autoreactive inflammatory Th cell subsets in the pathogenesis of MS is supported by the fact that most of the approved disease-modifying therapy target T cells.
IFN-β an antiviral cytokine with immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative effects, has been the first-line drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of RRMS in 1993. The most relevant effects of IFN-β on T cells are the inhibition of T cell activation and secretion of inflammatory cytokines [157], the shift of Th cells from an inflammatory Th1 to an anti-inflammatory Th2 cell phenotype, the reduction of both Th17 and IL-17 levels, and an increase of suppressive Treg [158,159]. A significant decrease of IL-22 in the serum of RRMS patients after 6 and 12 months of treatment with IFN-β has been also recently reported and correlated with a decrease of MS severity [160].
Glatiramer acetate (GA), a mixture of synthetic polypeptides containing only 4 amino acids, glutamate, lysine, alanine, and tyrosine, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of RRMS in 1996. Although the mechanisms of action of GA are not completely understood and elucidated, several studies suggest a pivotal role of GA on different antigen-presenting cells by promoting the differentiation of microglia, macrophages, and dendritic cells into the suppressive M2 phenotype producing anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as TGF-β and IL-10 [161,162,163]. The results of these actions on T cells involve the shift of reactive T cells from Th1 to Th2 [164,165] and the increase of Treg [166] that suppress the activity of all autoreactive inflammatory Th cell subsets. In this context, recent data from Spadaro et al. demonstrated that in GA-responder RRMS patients, anti-inflammatory Treg cells persist for more than 10 years after GA treatment [167]. Similar to IFN-β GA is not effective in reducing the disability in progressive MS [168,169] but, for its long-term efficacy and safety, is the most common first-line therapy registered worldwide for RRMS [170].
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a fumaric acid ester with anti-inflammatory activity has been approved for the treatment of RRMS in 2013 [171]. DMF exerts both direct and indirect effects on T cells [172]. DMF reduces the production of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, TNF, and IL-6 in microglia [173] and inhibits inflammatory cytokine production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [174,175], probably by interfering with the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB family of transcription factors [176]. In addition to a general reduction in peripheral T cell numbers observed in RRMS patients treated with DMF [177,178], profound changes in circulating Th cell subsets were also observed [179] with a particular reduction of memory CD4+ T cells [178]. DMF treatment also induces a shift of the balance between different Th cell subsets, with a reduction of IFN-γ-producing Th1 and IL-17-producing Th17 cells and an increase of IL-4-producing Th2 cells [180]. Finally, an optimal response to DMF treatment was also associated with an increase of Treg cells in the peripheral blood of RRMS patients [179,181].
Fingolimod, a first orally therapeutic molecule approved for RRMS [182,183], acts as an antagonist of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) that is essential for the egress of T lymphocytes from lymph nodes [184,185]. By binding S1PR and inducing its internalization, fingolimod mediates the sequestration of both naïve and effector memory T lymphocytes in the lymphoid organs [186,187]. A detailed analysis of fingolimod efficacy on different T cell subsets in treated RRMS patients evidenced a selective reduction in the frequency of both IFN-γ- and IL-17-producing cells [188]. More recent data from Dominuguez-Villar et al. showed that fingolimod treatment strongly reduced central memory Th1, Th17, and Th1-like Th17 cells, whereas effector memory Th1 and Th1-like Th17 cell subsets were less affected. The analysis of fingolimod effects on T cells during 12 months of treatment also evidenced a modulation of the phenotype of Th cells and Treg cells. Effector Th cells showed a decrease of IL-17 and IFN-γ and an increase of TGF-β and IL-10 production together with the expression of exhaustion markers such as programmed death 1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3) [189]. Moreover, the suppressive functions of Treg in fingolimod-treated RRMS patients were also upregulated, thus evidencing an additional role of fingolimod in restoring peripheral tolerance besides the retention of T lymphocytes in lymph nodes [189].
Natalizumab is another disease-modifying drug that interferes with the migration of T cells approved for RRMS in 2004. It is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets VLA-4 expressed by activated T and B cells [158] and inhibits VLA-4 interaction with vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expressed on endothelial cells [190], thus blocking T cell penetration of the BBB [191,192,193,194], in particular the Th1-like Th17.1 subset [123]. Despite the efficacy of both fingolimod and natalizumab in peripheral sequestering of inflammatory T cells and preventing their migration across the BBB, respectively, abnormal inflammatory activities and recurrence of clinical relapses have been observed after cessation of both fingolimod [195,196] and natalizumab therapy in MS patients [197,198]. Moreover, prolonged treatment with natalizumab has been also associated with the reactivation of latent John Cunningham virus, thus favoring progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [199,200].
FDA and EMA approved two humanized mAbs targeting T cells for RRMS. Alemtuzumab, approved in 2013, targets CD52 that is expressed at high levels on B and T cells [201], thus leading to the depletion of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by Ab-dependent (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [158]. Daclizumab, approved in 2016, is a mAb targeting CD25, the high-affinity subunit of IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), expressed on activated T cells and Treg [202]. In contrast to alemtuzumab, daclizumab does not mediate T cell depletion by ADCC or CDC but, by neutralizing IL-2 binding to CD25 and high-affinity IL-2R, inhibits the proliferation of activated T cells without affecting cells that express the low-affinity IL-2R, such as natural killer (NK) cells or resting T cells [203]. Due to the high risk of serious and potentially fatal immune reactions, including hepatitis and inflammatory brain disorders such as encephalitis and meningoencephalitis, in May 2018, the marketing authorization for daclizumab (Zynbrita) was revoked by EMA [204]. In November 2019, EMA also recommended a restrictive use of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) for RRMS patients with highly active disease despite treatment with at least one disease-modifying therapy [205]. Interestingly, Gingele et al. recently reported that ocrelizumab, a humanized mAb targeting CD20 approved in 2017 for relapsing MS and PPMS and thought to specifically target B cells [206,207], was also effective in depleting a highly activated CD20+ T cell subset producing inflammatory cytokines [208]. Since CD20+ inflammatory T cells are present in the peripheral blood and brain of MS patients [208,209], their depletion may account for the efficacy of ocralizumab therapy.
In addition to the currently approved T cell targeting therapies, several therapeutic approaches aimed at inhibiting autoreactive inflammatory T cells are currently tested in clinical trials for MS [210]. Among them, the most promising therapies include mAb targeting Th17-related cytokines, in particular IL-17A, which are currently in ongoing trials for MS. In particular, Secukinumab, a fully humanized anti-IL17A mAb aimed at suppressing pathogenic Th17 and Th1-like Th17 cell subset, has been approved in 2005 as first-line therapy for psoriasis [211,212]. The significant reduction (67%) of new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions observed in 73 treatment-naïve RRMS patients after 24 weeks of treatment with Secukinumab [213] led to a placebo-controlled randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT01874340). However, the trial was terminated by the sponsor based on the development of another anti-IL17A mAb, Ikekizumab, with better activity than Secukinumab for psoriasis [214,215] and superior potential in treating MS. Clinical trials are ongoing.
5. Conclusions
In the last two decades, our knowledge of the immunopathogenic mechanisms of MS has strongly improved, thus evidencing a fundamental role of encephalitogenic Th cells, in particular, Th1-Th17 like, Th17, Th22, and GM-CSF-producing CD4+ T cells, in initiating and perpetuating the inflammatory responses and the consequent neurodegeneration in MS. Accordingly, most of the approved therapeutic strategies are aimed to attenuate inflammatory T helper cells and emerging more selective T-cell-based therapeutic approaches are currently ongoing in clinical trials for MS.
Author Contributions
Writing—review and editing, M.K., C.A., S.F., and E.V.; writing—original draft, funding acquisition, L.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by “Progetto Ateneo 2018/2019”, Istituto Pasteur Italia-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy to L.T., and “Progetto Giovani Ricercatori” Italian Ministry of Health, Italy (cod. GR-2016-02361163) to E.V.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Thompson A.J., Banwell B.L., Barkhof F., Carroll W.M., Coetzee T., Comi G., Correale J., Fazekas F., Filippi M., Freedman M.S., et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:162–173. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dendrou C.A., Fugger L., Friese M.A. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015;15:545–558. doi: 10.1038/nri3871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brownlee W.J., Hardy T.A., Fazekas F., Miller D.H. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Progress and challenges. Lancet. 2017;389:1336–1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30959-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lorscheider J., Buzzard K., Jokubaitis V., Spelman T., Havrdova E., Horakova D., Trojano M., Izquierdo G., Girard M., Duquette P., et al. Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2016;139:2395–2405. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lassmann H., van Horssen J., Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: Pathology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012;8:647–656. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trapp B.D., Nave K.A. Multiple sclerosis: An immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;31:247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baecher-Allan C., Kaskow B.J., Weiner H.L. Multiple sclerosis: Mechanisms and immunotherapy. Neuron. 2018;97:742–768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thompson A.J., Baranzini S.E., Geurts J., Hemmer B., Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2018;391:1622–1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frischer J.M., Bramow S., Dal-Bianco A., Lucchinetti C.F., Rauschka H., Schmidbauer M., Laursen H., Sorensen P.S., Lassmann H. The relation between inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis brains. Brain. 2009;132:1175–1189. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hafler D.A., Benjamin D.S., Burks J., Weiner H.L. Myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein reactivity of brain- and cerebrospinal fluid-derived T cell clones in multiple sclerosis and postinfectious encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 1987;139:68–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ota K., Matsui M., Milford E.L., Mackin G.A., Weiner H.L., Hafler D.A. T-cell recognition of an immunodominant myelin basic protein epitope in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 1990;346:183–187. doi: 10.1038/346183a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zamvil S., Nelson P., Trotter J., Mitchell D., Knobler R., Fritz R., Steinman L. T-cell clones specific for myelin basic protein induce chronic relapsing paralysis and demyelination. Nature. 1985;317:355–358. doi: 10.1038/317355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zamvil S.S., Nelson P.A., Mitchell D.J., Knobler R.L., Fritz R.B., Steinman L. Encephalitogenic T cell clones specific for myelin basic protein. An unusual bias in antigen recognition. J. Exp. Med. 1985;162:2107–2124. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.6.2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang J., Markovic-Plese S., Lacet B., Raus J., Weiner H.L., Hafler D.A. Increased frequency of interleukin 2-responsive T cells specific for myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein in peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Exp. Med. 1994;179:973–984. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.3.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Batoulis H., Addicks K., Kuerten S. Emerging concepts in autoimmune encephalomyelitis beyond the CD4/T(h)1 paradigm. Ann. Anat. 2010;192:179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics C., Wellcome Trust Case Control C., Sawcer S., Hellenthal G., Pirinen M., Spencer C.C., Patsopoulos N.A., Moutsianas L., Dilthey A., Su Z., et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011;476:214–219. doi: 10.1038/nature10251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sallusto F. Heterogeneity of human CD4(+) T cells against microbes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2016;34:317–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cosmi L., Maggi L., Santarlasci V., Liotta F., Annunziato F. T helper cells plasticity in inflammation. Cytometry A. 2014;85:36–42. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mosmann T.R., Cherwinski H., Bond M.W., Giedlin M.A., Coffman R.L. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 1986;136:2348–2357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mosmann T.R., Coffman R.L. Th1 and Th2 cells: Different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1989;7:145–173. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Annunziato F., Cosmi L., Liotta F., Maggi E., Romagnani S. Human Th1 dichotomy: Origin, phenotype and biologic activities. Immunology. 2014;144:343–351. doi: 10.1111/imm.12399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Szabo S.J., Kim S.T., Costa G.L., Zhang X., Fathman C.G., Glimcher L.H. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell. 2000;100:655–669. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80702-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hsieh C.S., Macatonia S.E., Tripp C.S., Wolf S.F., O’Garra A., Murphy K.M. Development of Th1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by listeria-induced macrophages. Science. 1993;260:547–549. doi: 10.1126/science.8097338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ando D.G., Clayton J., Kono D., Urban J.L., Sercarz E.E. Encephalitogenic T cells in the B10.Pl model of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) are of the Th-1 lymphokine subtype. Cell Immunol. 1989;124:132–143. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(89)90117-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Voskuhl R.R., Martin R., Bergman C., Dalal M., Ruddle N.H., McFarland H.F. T helper 1 (Th1) functional phenotype of human myelin basic protein-specific T lymphocytes. Autoimmunity. 1993;15:137–143. doi: 10.3109/08916939309043888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Merrill J.E., Kono D.H., Clayton J., Ando D.G., Hinton D.R., Hofman F.M. Inflammatory leukocytes and cytokines in the peptide-induced disease of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in SJL and B10.Pl mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:574–578. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lock C., Hermans G., Pedotti R., Brendolan A., Schadt E., Garren H., Langer-Gould A., Strober S., Cannella B., Allard J., et al. Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Med. 2002;8:500–508. doi: 10.1038/nm0502-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Baron J.L., Madri J.A., Ruddle N.H., Hashim G., Janeway C.A., Jr. Surface expression of alpha 4 integrin by CD4 T cells is required for their entry into brain parenchyma. J. Exp. Med. 1993;177:57–68. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Segal B.M., Shevach E.M. IL-12 unmasks latent autoimmune disease in resistant mice. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:771–775. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.2.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Panitch H.S., Hirsch R.L., Haley A.S., Johnson K.P. Exacerbations of multiple sclerosis in patients treated with gamma interferon. Lancet. 1987;1:893–895. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92863-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Panitch H.S., Hirsch R.L., Schindler J., Johnson K.P. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with gamma interferon: Exacerbations associated with activation of the immune system. Neurology. 1987;37:1097–1102. doi: 10.1212/WNL.37.7.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aguzzi A., Barres B.A., Bennett M.L. Microglia: Scapegoat, saboteur, or something else? Science. 2013;339:156–161. doi: 10.1126/science.1227901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Murphy A.C., Lalor S.J., Lynch M.A., Mills K.H. Infiltration of Th1 and Th17 cells and activation of microglia in the cns during the course of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010;24:641–651. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Prajeeth C.K., Lohr K., Floess S., Zimmermann J., Ulrich R., Gudi V., Beineke A., Baumgartner W., Muller M., Huehn J., et al. Effector molecules released by Th1 but not Th17 cells drive an M1 response in microglia. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014;37:248–259. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gran B., Chu N., Zhang G.X., Yu S., Li Y., Chen X.H., Kamoun M., Rostami A. Early administration of IL-12 suppresses eae through induction of interferon-gamma. J. Neuroimmunol. 2004;156:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Becher B., Durell B.G., Noelle R.J. Experimental autoimmune encephalitis and inflammation in the absence of interleukin-12. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;110:493–497. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang G.X., Gran B., Yu S., Li J., Siglienti I., Chen X., Kamoun M., Rostami A. Induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in IL-12 receptor-beta 2-deficient mice: IL-12 responsiveness is not required in the pathogenesis of inflammatory demyelination in the central nervous system. J. Immunol. 2003;170:2153–2160. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ferber I.A., Brocke S., Taylor-Edwards C., Ridgway W., Dinisco C., Steinman L., Dalton D., Fathman C.G. Mice with a disrupted IFN-gamma gene are susceptible to the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (eae) J. Immunol. 1996;156:5–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oppmann B., Lesley R., Blom B., Timans J.C., Xu Y., Hunte B., Vega F., Yu N., Wang J., Singh K., et al. Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12. Immunity. 2000;13:715–725. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Parham C., Chirica M., Timans J., Vaisberg E., Travis M., Cheung J., Pflanz S., Zhang R., Singh K.P., Vega F., et al. A receptor for the heterodimeric cytokine IL-23 is composed of IL-12Rbeta1 and a novel cytokine receptor subunit, IL-23R. J. Immunol. 2002;168:5699–5708. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Langrish C.L., Chen Y., Blumenschein W.M., Mattson J., Basham B., Sedgwick J.D., McClanahan T., Kastelein R.A., Cua D.J. IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:233–240. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Harrington L.E., Hatton R.D., Mangan P.R., Turner H., Murphy T.L., Murphy K.M., Weaver C.T. Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:1123–1132. doi: 10.1038/ni1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Park H., Li Z., Yang X.O., Chang S.H., Nurieva R., Wang Y.H., Wang Y., Hood L., Zhu Z., Tian Q., et al. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:1133–1141. doi: 10.1038/ni1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stockinger B., Veldhoen M. Differentiation and function of Th17 T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007;19:281–286. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Annunziato F., Cosmi L., Liotta F., Maggi E., Romagnani S. Defining the human T helper 17 cell phenotype. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:505–512. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kolls J.K., Linden A. Interleukin-17 family members and inflammation. Immunity. 2004;21:467–476. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pelletier M., Maggi L., Micheletti A., Lazzeri E., Tamassia N., Costantini C., Cosmi L., Lunardi C., Annunziato F., Romagnani S., et al. Evidence for a cross-talk between human neutrophils and Th17 cells. Blood. 2010;115:335–343. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-04-216085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Korn T., Bettelli E., Oukka M., Kuchroo V.K. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009;27:485–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nurieva R., Yang X.O., Martinez G., Zhang Y., Panopoulos A.D., Ma L., Schluns K., Tian Q., Watowich S.S., Jetten A.M., et al. Essential autocrine regulation by IL-21 in the generation of inflammatory T cells. Nature. 2007;448:480–483. doi: 10.1038/nature05969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liang S.C., Tan X.Y., Luxenberg D.P., Karim R., Dunussi-Joannopoulos K., Collins M., Fouser L.A. Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:2271–2279. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stadhouders R., Lubberts E., Hendriks R.W. A cellular and molecular view of T helper 17 cell plasticity in autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 2018;87:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Volpe E., Battistini L., Borsellino G. Advances in T helper 17 cell biology: Pathogenic role and potential therapy in multiple sclerosis. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:475158. doi: 10.1155/2015/475158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tahmasebinia F., Pourgholaminejad A. The role of Th17 cells in auto-inflammatory neurological disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2017;79:408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Prajeeth C.K., Kronisch J., Khorooshi R., Knier B., Toft-Hansen H., Gudi V., Floess S., Huehn J., Owens T., Korn T., et al. Effectors of Th1 and Th17 cells act on astrocytes and augment their neuroinflammatory properties. J. Neuroinflammation. 2017;14:204. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0978-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Brambilla R. The contribution of astrocytes to the neuroinflammatory response in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-01980-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Das Sarma J., Ciric B., Marek R., Sadhukhan S., Caruso M.L., Shafagh J., Fitzgerald D.C., Shindler K.S., Rostami A. Functional interleukin-17 receptor a is expressed in central nervous system glia and upregulated in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroinflammation. 2009;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Elain G., Jeanneau K., Rutkowska A., Mir A.K., Dev K.K. The selective anti-IL17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab (AIN457) attenuates IL17A-induced levels of IL6 in human astrocytes. Glia. 2014;62:725–735. doi: 10.1002/glia.22637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kang Z., Altuntas C.Z., Gulen M.F., Liu C., Giltiay N., Qin H., Liu L., Qian W., Ransohoff R.M., Bergmann C., et al. Astrocyte-restricted ablation of interleukin-17-induced Act1-mediated signaling ameliorates autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunity. 2010;32:414–425. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Prajeeth C.K., Dittrich-Breiholz O., Talbot S.R., Robert P.A., Huehn J., Stangel M. Ifn-gamma producing Th1 cells induce different transcriptional profiles in microglia and astrocytes. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:352. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kang Z., Wang C., Zepp J., Wu L., Sun K., Zhao J., Chandrasekharan U., DiCorleto P.E., Trapp B.D., Ransohoff R.M., et al. Act1 mediates IL-17-induced EAE pathogenesis selectively in NG2+ glial cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2013;16:1401–1408. doi: 10.1038/nn.3505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Paintlia M.K., Paintlia A.S., Singh A.K., Singh I. Synergistic activity of interleukin-17 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha enhances oxidative stress-mediated oligodendrocyte apoptosis. J. Neurochem. 2011;116:508–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07136.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dulamea A.O. Role of oligodendrocyte dysfunction in demyelination, remyelination and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;958:91–127. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47861-6_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stromnes I.M., Cerretti L.M., Liggitt D., Harris R.A., Goverman J.M. Differential regulation of central nervous system autoimmunity by T(h)1 and T(h)17 cells. Nat. Med. 2008;14:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nm1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Dos Passos G.R., Sato D.K., Becker J., Fujihara K. Th17 cells pathways in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5314541. doi: 10.1155/2016/5314541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Brucklacher-Waldert V., Stuerner K., Kolster M., Wolthausen J., Tolosa E. Phenotypical and functional characterization of T helper 17 cells in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2009;132:3329–3341. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Matusevicius D., Kivisakk P., He B., Kostulas N., Ozenci V., Fredrikson S., Link H. Interleukin-17 mrna expression in blood and csf mononuclear cells is augmented in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 1999;5:101–104. doi: 10.1177/135245859900500206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Durelli L., Conti L., Clerico M., Boselli D., Contessa G., Ripellino P., Ferrero B., Eid P., Novelli F. T-helper 17 cells expand in multiple sclerosis and are inhibited by interferon-beta. Ann. Neurol. 2009;65:499–509. doi: 10.1002/ana.21652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tzartos J.S., Friese M.A., Craner M.J., Palace J., Newcombe J., Esiri M.M., Fugger L. Interleukin-17 production in central nervous system-infiltrating T cells and glial cells is associated with active disease in multiple sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2008;172:146–155. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hedegaard C.J., Krakauer M., Bendtzen K., Lund H., Sellebjerg F., Nielsen C.H. T helper cell type 1 (Th1), Th2 and Th17 responses to myelin basic protein and disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2008;125:161–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02837.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Arellano G., Acuna E., Reyes L.I., Ottum P.A., De Sarno P., Villarroel L., Ciampi E., Uribe-San Martin R., Carcamo C., Naves R. Th1 and Th17 cells and associated cytokines discriminate among clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis phenotypes. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:753. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kebir H., Kreymborg K., Ifergan I., Dodelet-Devillers A., Cayrol R., Bernard M., Giuliani F., Arbour N., Becher B., Prat A. Human Th17 lymphocytes promote blood-brain barrier disruption and central nervous system inflammation. Nat. Med. 2007;13:1173–1175. doi: 10.1038/nm1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Setiadi A.F., Abbas A.R., Jeet S., Wong K., Bischof A., Peng I., Lee J., Bremer M., Eggers E.L., DeVoss J., et al. IL-17A is associated with the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2019;332:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wanke F., Tang Y., Gronke K., Klebow S., Moos S., Hauptmann J., Shanmugavadivu A., Regen T., Mufazalov I.A., Gabriel L.A., et al. Expression of IL-17F is associated with non-pathogenic Th17 cells. J. Mol. Med. (Berl) 2018;96:819–829. doi: 10.1007/s00109-018-1662-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Rahman M.T., Ghosh C., Hossain M., Linfield D., Rezaee F., Janigro D., Marchi N., van Boxel-Dezaire A.H.H. IFN-gamma, IL-17A, or zonulin rapidly increase the permeability of the blood-brain and small intestinal epithelial barriers: Relevance for neuro-inflammatory diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;507:274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Colamatteo A., Maggioli E., Azevedo Loiola R., Hamid Sheikh M., Cali G., Bruzzese D., Maniscalco G.T., Centonze D., Buttari F., Lanzillo R., et al. Reduced annexin A1 expression associates with disease severity and inflammation in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Immunol. 2019;203:1753–1765. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ivanov I.I., McKenzie B.S., Zhou L., Tadokoro C.E., Lepelley A., Lafaille J.J., Cua D.J., Littman D.R. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory il-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126:1121–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Harris T.J., Grosso J.F., Yen H.R., Xin H., Kortylewski M., Albesiano E., Hipkiss E.L., Getnet D., Goldberg M.V., Maris C.H., et al. Cutting edge: An in vivo requirement for STAT3 signaling in Th17 development and Th17-dependent autoimmunity. J. Immunol. 2007;179:4313–4317. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Whitley S.K., Balasubramani A., Zindl C., Sen R., Shibata Y., Crawford G.E., Weathington N.M., Hatton R.D., Weaver C.T. IL-1R signaling promotes STAT33 and NF-kappaB factor recruitment to distal cis-regulatory elements that regulate IL17A/F transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2018 doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hirahara K., Ghoreschi K., Laurence A., Yang X.P., Kanno Y., O’Shea J.J. Signal transduction pathways and transcriptional regulation in Th17 cell differentiation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:425–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cosmi L., De Palma R., Santarlasci V., Maggi L., Capone M., Frosali F., Rodolico G., Querci V., Abbate G., Angeli R., et al. Human interleukin 17-producing cells originate from a CD161+CD4+ T cell precursor. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:1903–1916. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Annunziato F., Cosmi L., Liotta F., Maggi E., Romagnani S. Human Th17 cells: Are they different from murine Th17 cells? Eur. J. Immunol. 2009;39:637–640. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bettelli E., Carrier Y., Gao W., Korn T., Strom T.B., Oukka M., Weiner H.L., Kuchroo V.K. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector Th17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441:235–238. doi: 10.1038/nature04753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Yang X.O., Pappu B.P., Nurieva R., Akimzhanov A., Kang H.S., Chung Y., Ma L., Shah B., Panopoulos A.D., Schluns K.S., et al. T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors ROR alpha and ROR gamma. Immunity. 2008;28:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Acosta-Rodriguez E.V., Napolitani G., Lanzavecchia A., Sallusto F. Interleukins 1beta and 6 but not transforming growth factor-beta are essential for the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing human T helper cells. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:942–949. doi: 10.1038/ni1496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Basu R., Whitley S.K., Bhaumik S., Zindl C.L., Schoeb T.R., Benveniste E.N., Pear W.S., Hatton R.D., Weaver C.T. IL-1 signaling modulates activation of stat transcription factors to antagonize retinoic acid signaling and control the Th17 cell-iTreg cell balance. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:286–295. doi: 10.1038/ni.3099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mailer R.K., Joly A.L., Liu S., Elias S., Tegner J., Andersson J. IL-1beta promotes Th17 differentiation by inducing alternative splicing of FOXP3. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:14674. doi: 10.1038/srep14674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Wilson N.J., Boniface K., Chan J.R., McKenzie B.S., Blumenschein W.M., Mattson J.D., Basham B., Smith K., Chen T., Morel F., et al. Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:950–957. doi: 10.1038/ni1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Manel N., Unutmaz D., Littman D.R. The differentiation of human T(h)-17 cells requires transforming growth factor-beta and induction of the nuclear receptor RORgammat. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:641–649. doi: 10.1038/ni.1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Volpe E., Servant N., Zollinger R., Bogiatzi S.I., Hupe P., Barillot E., Soumelis V. A critical function for transforming growth factor-beta, interleukin 23 and proinflammatory cytokines in driving and modulating human T(h)-17 responses. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:650–657. doi: 10.1038/ni.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Yang L., Anderson D.E., Baecher-Allan C., Hastings W.D., Bettelli E., Oukka M., Kuchroo V.K., Hafler D.A. IL-21 and TGF-beta are required for differentiation of human T(h)17 cells. Nature. 2008;454:350–352. doi: 10.1038/nature07021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Porciello N., Grazioli P., Campese A.F., Kunkl M., Caristi S., Mastrogiovanni M., Muscolini M., Spadaro F., Favre C., Nunes J.A., et al. A non-conserved amino acid variant regulates differential signalling between human and mouse CD28. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1080. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03385-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Muscolini M., Camperio C., Porciello N., Caristi S., Capuano C., Viola A., Galandrini R., Tuosto L. Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase alpha and Vav1 mutual cooperation in CD28-mediated actin remodeling and signaling functions. J. Immunol. 2015;194:1323–1333. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Porciello N., Tuosto L. Cd28 costimulatory signals in T lymphocyte activation: Emerging functions beyond a qualitative and quantitative support to TCR signalling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016;28:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Porciello N., Kunkl M., Tuosto L. CD28 between tolerance and autoimmunity: The side effects of animal models. F1000Research. 2018;7 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14046.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Santarlasci V., Maggi L., Capone M., Querci V., Beltrame L., Cavalieri D., D’Aiuto E., Cimaz R., Nebbioso A., Liotta F., et al. Rarity of human T helper 17 cells is due to retinoic acid orphan receptor-dependent mechanisms that limit their expansion. Immunity. 2012;36:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kunkl M., Porciello N., Mastrogiovanni M., Capuano C., Lucantoni F., Moretti C., Persson J.L., Galandrini R., Buzzetti R., Tuosto L. ISA-2011B, a phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase alpha inhibitor, impairs CD28-dependent costimulatory and pro-inflammatory signals in human T lymphocytes. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:502. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kunkl M., Sambucci M., Ruggieri S., Amormino C., Tortorella C., Gasperini C., Battistini L., Tuosto L. CD28 autonomous signaling up-regulates c-myc expression and promotes glycolysis enabling inflammatory T cell responses in multiple sclerosis. Cells. 2019;8:575. doi: 10.3390/cells8060575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Camperio C., Muscolini M., Volpe E., Di Mitri D., Mechelli R., Buscarinu M.C., Ruggieri S., Piccolella E., Salvetti M., Gasperini C., et al. CD28 ligation in the absence of TCR stimulation up-regulates IL-17A and pro-inflammatory cytokines in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis T lymphocytes. Immunol. Lett. 2014;158:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cosmi L., Santarlasci V., Maggi L., Liotta F., Annunziato F. Th17 plasticity: Pathophysiology and treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2014;17:12–16. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Gagliani N., Magnani C.F., Huber S., Gianolini M.E., Pala M., Licona-Limon P., Guo B., Herbert D.R., Bulfone A., Trentini F., et al. Coexpression of CD49b and LAG-3 identifies human and mouse T regulatory type 1 cells. Nat. Med. 2013;19:739–746. doi: 10.1038/nm.3179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Apetoh L., Quintana F.J., Pot C., Joller N., Xiao S., Kumar D., Burns E.J., Sherr D.H., Weiner H.L., Kuchroo V.K. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nat. Immunol. 2010;11:854–861. doi: 10.1038/ni.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gagliani N., Amezcua Vesely M.C., Iseppon A., Brockmann L., Xu H., Palm N.W., de Zoete M.R., Licona-Limon P., Paiva R.S., Ching T., et al. Th17 cells transdifferentiate into regulatory T cells during resolution of inflammation. Nature. 2015;523:221–225. doi: 10.1038/nature14452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Capone A., Bianco M., Ruocco G., De Bardi M., Battistini L., Ruggieri S., Gasperini C., Centonze D., Sette C., Volpe E. Distinct expression of inflammatory features in T helper 17 cells from multiple sclerosis patients. Cells. 2019;8:533. doi: 10.3390/cells8060533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hu D., Notarbartolo S., Croonenborghs T., Patel B., Cialic R., Yang T.H., Aschenbrenner D., Andersson K.M., Gattorno M., Pham M., et al. Transcriptional signature of human pro-inflammatory Th17 cells identifies reduced IL10 gene expression in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1600. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01571-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ghezzi L., Cantoni C., Cignarella F., Bollman B., Cross A.H., Salter A., Galimberti D., Cella M., Piccio L. T cells producing GM-CSF and IL-13 are enriched in the cerebrospinal fluid of relapsing MS patients. Mult. Scler. 2019:1352458519852092. doi: 10.1177/1352458519852092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Muls N., Nasr Z., Dang H.A., Sindic C., van Pesch V. IL-22, GM-CSF and IL-17 In peripheral CD4+ T cell subpopulations during multiple sclerosis relapses and remission. Impact of corticosteroid therapy. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0173780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Trifari S., Spits H. IL-22-producing CD4+ T cells: Middle-men between the immune system and its environment. Eur J. Immunol. 2010;40:2369–2371. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Eyerich S., Eyerich K., Cavani A., Schmidt-Weber C. IL-17 and IL-22: Siblings, not twins. Trends Immunol. 2010;31:354–361. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Shabgah A.G., Navashenaq J.G., Shabgah O.G., Mohammadi H., Sahebkar A. Interleukin-22 in human inflammatory diseases and viral infections. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017;16:1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Xin N., Namaka M.P., Dou C., Zhang Y. Exploring the role of interleukin-22 in neurological and autoimmune disorders. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:1076–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Mangan P.R., Harrington L.E., O’Quinn D.B., Helms W.S., Bullard D.C., Elson C.O., Hatton R.D., Wahl S.M., Schoeb T.R., Weaver C.T. Transforming growth factor-beta induces development of the T(h)17 lineage. Nature. 2006;441:231–234. doi: 10.1038/nature04754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Acosta-Rodriguez E.V., Rivino L., Geginat J., Jarrossay D., Gattorno M., Lanzavecchia A., Sallusto F., Napolitani G. Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17-producing T helper memory cells. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:639–646. doi: 10.1038/ni1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Duhen T., Campbell D.J. Il-1beta promotes the differentiation of polyfunctional human CCR6+CXCR3+ Th1/17 cells that are specific for pathogenic and commensal microbes. J. Immunol. 2014;193:120–129. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Maggi L., Cimaz R., Capone M., Santarlasci V., Querci V., Simonini G., Nencini F., Liotta F., Romagnani S., Maggi E., et al. Brief report: Etanercept inhibits the tumor necrosis factor alpha-driven shift of Th17 lymphocytes toward a nonclassic Th1 phenotype in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1372–1377. doi: 10.1002/art.38355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Nistala K., Adams S., Cambrook H., Ursu S., Olivito B., de Jager W., Evans J.G., Cimaz R., Bajaj-Elliott M., Wedderburn L.R. Th17 plasticity in human autoimmune arthritis is driven by the inflammatory environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:14751–14756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003852107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lee Y., Awasthi A., Yosef N., Quintana F.J., Xiao S., Peters A., Wu C., Kleinewietfeld M., Kunder S., Hafler D.A., et al. Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic Th17 cells. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:991–999. doi: 10.1038/ni.2416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Gaublomme J.T., Yosef N., Lee Y., Gertner R.S., Yang L.V., Wu C., Pandolfi P.P., Mak T., Satija R., Shalek A.K., et al. Single-cell genomics unveils critical regulators of Th17 cell pathogenicity. Cell. 2015;163:1400–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Becher B., Segal B.M. T(h)17 cytokines in autoimmune neuro-inflammation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011;23:707–712. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kebir H., Ifergan I., Alvarez J.I., Bernard M., Poirier J., Arbour N., Duquette P., Prat A. Preferential recruitment of interferon-gamma-expressing Th17 cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2009;66:390–402. doi: 10.1002/ana.21748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Edwards L.J., Robins R.A., Constantinescu C.S. Th17/Th1 phenotype in demyelinating disease. Cytokine. 2010;50:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Cao Y., Goods B.A., Raddassi K., Nepom G.T., Kwok W.W., Love J.C., Hafler D.A. Functional inflammatory profiles distinguish myelin-reactive T cells from patients with multiple sclerosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:287ra274. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa8038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Paroni M., Maltese V., De Simone M., Ranzani V., Larghi P., Fenoglio C., Pietroboni A.M., De Riz M.A., Crosti M.C., Maglie S., et al. Recognition of viral and self-antigens by Th1 and Th1/Th17 central memory cells in patients with multiple sclerosis reveals distinct roles in immune surveillance and relapses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;140:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.11.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.van Langelaar J., van der Vuurst de Vries R.M., Janssen M., Wierenga-Wolf A.F., Spilt I.M., Siepman T.A., Dankers W., Verjans G., de Vries H.E., Lubberts E., et al. T helper 17.1 cells associate with multiple sclerosis disease activity: Perspectives for early intervention. Brain. 2018;141:1334–1349. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Dumoutier L., Van Roost E., Ameye G., Michaux L., Renauld J.C. IL-TIF/IL-22: Genomic organization and mapping of the human and mouse genes. Genes Immun. 2000;1:488–494. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Duhen T., Geiger R., Jarrossay D., Lanzavecchia A., Sallusto F. Production of interleukin 22 but not interleukin 17 by a subset of human skin-homing memory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:857–863. doi: 10.1038/ni.1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Trifari S., Kaplan C.D., Tran E.H., Crellin N.K., Spits H. Identification of a human helper T cell population that has abundant production of interleukin 22 and is distinct from T(h)-17, T(h)1 and T(h)2 cells. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:864–871. doi: 10.1038/ni.1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Eyerich S., Eyerich K., Pennino D., Carbone T., Nasorri F., Pallotta S., Cianfarani F., Odorisio T., Traidl-Hoffmann C., Behrendt H., et al. Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling. J. Clin. Invest. 2009;119:3573–3585. doi: 10.1172/JCI40202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Witte E., Witte K., Warszawska K., Sabat R., Wolk K. Interleukin-22: A cytokine produced by T, NK and NKT cell subsets, with importance in the innate immune defense and tissue protection. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:365–379. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Cella M., Fuchs A., Vermi W., Facchetti F., Otero K., Lennerz J.K., Doherty J.M., Mills J.C., Colonna M. A human natural killer cell subset provides an innate source of IL-22 for mucosal immunity. Nature. 2009;457:722–725. doi: 10.1038/nature07537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Dudakov J.A., Hanash A.M., van den Brink M.R. Interleukin-22: Immunobiology and pathology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015;33:747–785. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032414-112123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Schreiber F., Arasteh J.M., Lawley T.D. Pathogen resistance mediated by IL-22 signaling at the epithelial-microbiota interface. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:3676–3682. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Xu W., Li R., Dai Y., Wu A., Wang H., Cheng C., Qiu W., Lu Z., Zhong X., Shu Y., et al. IL-22 secreting CD4+ T cells in the patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013;261:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Perriard G., Mathias A., Enz L., Canales M., Schluep M., Gentner M., Schaeren-Wiemers N., Du Pasquier R.A. Interleukin-22 is increased in multiple sclerosis patients and targets astrocytes. J. Neuroinflammation. 2015;12:119. doi: 10.1186/s12974-015-0335-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Wing A.C., Hygino J., Ferreira T.B., Kasahara T.M., Barros P.O., Sacramento P.M., Andrade R.M., Camargo S., Rueda F., Alves-Leon S.V., et al. Interleukin-17- and interleukin-22-secreting myelin-specific CD4(+) T cells resistant to corticoids are related with active brain lesions in multiple sclerosis patients. Immunology. 2016;147:212–220. doi: 10.1111/imm.12552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Almolda B., Costa M., Montoya M., Gonzalez B., Castellano B. Increase in Th17 and T-reg lymphocytes and decrease of IL22 correlate with the recovery phase of acute EAE in rat. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Rolla S., Bardina V., De Mercanti S., Quaglino P., De Palma R., Gned D., Brusa D., Durelli L., Novelli F., Clerico M. Th22 cells are expanded in multiple sclerosis and are resistant to IFN-beta. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014;96:1155–1164. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5A0813-463RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Zhen J., Yuan J., Fu Y., Zhu R., Wang M., Chang H., Zhao Y., Wang D., Lu Z. Il-22 promotes fas expression in oligodendrocytes and inhibits FOXP3 expression in T cells by activating the NF-kappaB pathway in multiple sclerosis. Mol. Immunol. 2017;82:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2016.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Beyeen A.D., Adzemovic M.Z., Ockinger J., Stridh P., Becanovic K., Laaksonen H., Lassmann H., Harris R.A., Hillert J., Alfredsson L., et al. IL-22RA2 associates with multiple sclerosis and macrophage effector mechanisms in experimental neuroinflammation. J. Immunol. 2010;185:6883–6890. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Laaksonen H., Guerreiro-Cacais A.O., Adzemovic M.Z., Parsa R., Zeitelhofer M., Jagodic M., Olsson T. The multiple sclerosis risk gene IL22RA2 contributes to a more severe murine autoimmune neuroinflammation. Genes Immun. 2014;15:457–465. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Dardalhon V., Awasthi A., Kwon H., Galileos G., Gao W., Sobel R.A., Mitsdoerffer M., Strom T.B., Elyaman W., Ho I.C., et al. IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced FOXP3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates iL-9+ IL-10+ FOXP3(-) effector T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:1347–1355. doi: 10.1038/ni.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Veldhoen M., Uyttenhove C., van Snick J., Helmby H., Westendorf A., Buer J., Martin B., Wilhelm C., Stockinger B. Transforming growth factor-beta ‘reprograms’ the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:1341–1346. doi: 10.1038/ni.1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Jager A., Dardalhon V., Sobel R.A., Bettelli E., Kuchroo V.K. Th1, Th17, and Th9 effector cells induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with different pathological phenotypes. J. Immunol. 2009;183:7169–7177. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Elyaman W., Bradshaw E.M., Uyttenhove C., Dardalhon V., Awasthi A., Imitola J., Bettelli E., Oukka M., van Snick J., Renauld J.C., et al. IL-9 induces differentiation of Th17 cells and enhances function of FOXP3+ natural regulatory T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:12885–12890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812530106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Ghoreschi K., Laurence A., Yang X.P., Tato C.M., McGeachy M.J., Konkel J.E., Ramos H.L., Wei L., Davidson T.S., Bouladoux N., et al. Generation of pathogenic T(h)17 cells in the absence of TGF-beta signalling. Nature. 2010;467:967–971. doi: 10.1038/nature09447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Li H., Nourbakhsh B., Ciric B., Zhang G.X., Rostami A. Neutralization of IL-9 ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by decreasing the effector T cell population. J. Immunol. 2010;185:4095–4100. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Nowak E.C., Weaver C.T., Turner H., Begum-Haque S., Becher B., Schreiner B., Coyle A.J., Kasper L.H., Noelle R.J. IL-9 as a mediator of Th17-driven inflammatory disease. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:1653–1660. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Ruocco G., Rossi S., Motta C., Macchiarulo G., Barbieri F., De Bardi M., Borsellino G., Finardi A., Grasso M.G., Ruggieri S., et al. T helper 9 cells induced by plasmacytoid dendritic cells regulate interleukin-17 in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Sci. (Lond) 2015;129:291–303. doi: 10.1042/CS20140608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Matsushita T., Tateishi T., Isobe N., Yonekawa T., Yamasaki R., Matsuse D., Murai H., Kira J. Characteristic cerebrospinal fluid cytokine/chemokine profiles in neuromyelitis optica, relapsing remitting or primary progressive multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Fontaine R.H., Cases O., Lelievre V., Mesples B., Renauld J.C., Loron G., Degos V., Dournaud P., Baud O., Gressens P. IL-9/IL-9 receptor signaling selectively protects cortical neurons against developmental apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1542–1552. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Bsibsi M., Persoon-Deen C., Verwer R.W., Meeuwsen S., Ravid R., Van Noort J.M. Toll-like receptor 3 on adult human astrocytes triggers production of neuroprotective mediators. Glia. 2006;53:688–695. doi: 10.1002/glia.20328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Sakaguchi S., Sakaguchi N., Asano M., Itoh M., Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 1995;155:1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Fontenot J.D., Gavin M.A., Rudensky A.Y. FOXP3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:330–336. doi: 10.1038/ni904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Povoleri G.A., Scotta C., Nova-Lamperti E.A., John S., Lombardi G., Afzali B. Thymic versus induced regulatory T cells - who regulates the regulators? Front. Immunol. 2013;4:169. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Sambucci M., Gargano F., Guerrera G., Battistini L., Borsellino G. One, no one, and one hundred thousand: T regulatory cells’ multiple identities in neuroimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2947. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Carbone F., De Rosa V., Carrieri P.B., Montella S., Bruzzese D., Porcellini A., Procaccini C., La Cava A., Matarese G. Regulatory T cell proliferative potential is impaired in human autoimmune disease. Nat. Med. 2014;20:69. doi: 10.1038/nm.3411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.De Rosa V., Galgani M., Porcellini A., Colamatteo A., Santopaolo M., Zuchegna C., Romano A., De Simone S., Procaccini C., La Rocca C., et al. Glycolysis controls the induction of human regulatory T cells by modulating the expression of FOXP3 exon 2 splicing variants. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:1174. doi: 10.1038/ni.3269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Mirandola S.R., Hallal D.E., Farias A.S., Oliveira E.C., Brandao C.O., Ruocco H.H., Damasceno B.P., Santos L.M. Interferon-beta modifies the peripheral blood cell cytokine secretion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:824–830. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Rommer P.S., Milo R., Han M.H., Satyanarayan S., Sellner J., Hauer L., Illes Z., Warnke C., Laurent S., Weber M.S., et al. Immunological aspects of approved MS therapeutics. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1564. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Chen M., Chen G., Deng S., Liu X., Hutton G.J., Hong J. IFN-beta induces the proliferation of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells through upregulation of GITRL on dendritic cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2012;242:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Abdel-Dayem M.A., Shaker M.E., Gameil N.M. Impact of interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a and fingolimod therapies on serum interleukins-22, 32alpha and 34 concentrations in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2019;337:577062. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.577062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Weber M.S., Starck M., Wagenpfeil S., Meinl E., Hohlfeld R., Farina C. Multiple sclerosis: Glatiramer acetate inhibits monocyte reactivity in vitro and in vivo. Brain. 2004;127:1370–1378. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Kim H.J., Ifergan I., Antel J.P., Seguin R., Duddy M., Lapierre Y., Jalili F., Bar-Or A. Type 2 monocyte and microglia differentiation mediated by glatiramer acetate therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2004;172:7144–7153. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.7144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Vieira P.L., Heystek H.C., Wormmeester J., Wierenga E.A., Kapsenberg M.L. Glatiramer acetate (copolymer-1, copaxone) promotes Th2 cell development and increased IL-10 production through modulation of dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2003;170:4483–4488. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Neuhaus O., Farina C., Yassouridis A., Wiendl H., Then Bergh F., Dose T., Wekerle H., Hohlfeld R. Multiple sclerosis: Comparison of copolymer-1- reactive T cell lines from treated and untreated subjects reveals cytokine shift from T helper 1 to T helper 2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:7452–7457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Chen M., Gran B., Costello K., Johnson K., Martin R., Dhib-Jalbut S. Glatiramer acetate induces a Th2-biased response and crossreactivity with myelin basic protein in patients with MS. Mult. Scler. 2001;7:209–219. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Hong J., Li N., Zhang X., Zheng B., Zhang J.Z. Induction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by copolymer-I through activation of transcription factor FOXP3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:6449–6454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502187102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Spadaro M., Montarolo F., Perga S., Martire S., Brescia F., Malucchi S., Bertolotto A. Biological activity of glatiramer acetate on Treg and anti-inflammatory monocytes persists for more than 10years in responder multiple sclerosis patients. Clin. Immunol. 2017;181:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Wolinsky J.S., Narayana P.A., O’Connor P., Coyle P.K., Ford C., Johnson K., Miller A., Pardo L., Kadosh S., Ladkani D., et al. Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Neurol. 2007;61:14–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.21079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Correale J., Gaitan M.I., Ysrraelit M.C., Fiol M.P. Progressive multiple sclerosis: From pathogenic mechanisms to treatment. Brain. 2017;140:527–546. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Ford C., Goodman A.D., Johnson K., Kachuck N., Lindsey J.W., Lisak R., Luzzio C., Myers L., Panitch H., Preiningerova J., et al. Continuous long-term immunomodulatory therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Results from the 15-year analysis of the us prospective open-label study of glatiramer acetate. Mult. Scler. 2010;16:342–350. doi: 10.1177/1352458509358088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Dubey D., Kieseier B.C., Hartung H.P., Hemmer B., Warnke C., Menge T., Miller-Little W.A., Stuve O. Dimethyl fumarate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Rationale, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety. Exp. Rev. Neurother. 2015;15:339–346. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1025755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Mills E.A., Ogrodnik M.A., Plave A., Mao-Draayer Y. Emerging understanding of the mechanism of action for dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:5. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Wilms H., Sievers J., Rickert U., Rostami-Yazdi M., Mrowietz U., Lucius R. Dimethylfumarate inhibits microglial and astrocytic inflammation by suppressing the synthesis of nitric oxide, IL-1beta, TNF-alpha and IL-6 in an in-vitro model of brain inflammation. J. Neuroinflammation. 2010;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.McGuire V.A., Ruiz-Zorrilla Diez T., Emmerich C.H., Strickson S., Ritorto M.S., Sutavani R.V., Weibeta A., Houslay K.F., Knebel A., Meakin P.J., et al. Dimethyl fumarate blocks pro-inflammatory cytokine production via inhibition of TLR induced M1 and K63 ubiquitin chain formation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31159. doi: 10.1038/srep31159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Li R., Rezk A., Ghadiri M., Luessi F., Zipp F., Li H., Giacomini P.S., Antel J., Bar-Or A. Dimethyl fumarate treatment mediates an anti-inflammatory shift in B cell subsets of patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2017;198:691–698. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Gillard G.O., Collette B., Anderson J., Chao J., Scannevin R.H., Huss D.J., Fontenot J.D. Dmf, but not other fumarates, inhibits NF-kappaB activity in vitro in an NRF2-independent manner. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015;283:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Ghadiri M., Rezk A., Li R., Evans A., Luessi F., Zipp F., Giacomini P.S., Antel J., Bar-Or A. Dimethyl fumarate-induced lymphopenia in MS due to differential T-cell subset apoptosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2017;4:e340. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Longbrake E.E., Ramsbottom M.J., Cantoni C., Ghezzi L., Cross A.H., Piccio L. Dimethyl fumarate selectively reduces memory T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 2016;22:1061–1070. doi: 10.1177/1352458515608961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Gross C.C., Schulte-Mecklenbeck A., Klinsing S., Posevitz-Fejfar A., Wiendl H., Klotz L. Dimethyl fumarate treatment alters circulating T helper cell subsets in multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e183. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Wu Q., Wang Q., Mao G., Dowling C.A., Lundy S.K., Mao-Draayer Y. Dimethyl fumarate selectively reduces memory T cells and shifts the balance between Th1/Th17 and Th2 in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Immunol. 2017;198:3069–3080. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Medina S., Villarrubia N., Sainz de la Maza S., Lifante J., Costa-Frossard L., Roldan E., Picon C., Alvarez-Cermeno J.C., Villar L.M. Optimal response to dimethyl fumarate associates in MS with a shift from an inflammatory to a tolerogenic blood cell profile. Mult. Scler. 2018;24:1317–1327. doi: 10.1177/1352458517717088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Kappos L., Polman C., Pozzilli C., Thompson A., Beckmann K., Dahlke F. Final analysis of the european multicenter trial on IFNbeta-1b in secondary-progressive MS. Neurology. 2001;57:1969–1975. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.11.1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Kappos L., Radue E.W., O’Connor P., Polman C., Hohlfeld R., Calabresi P., Selmaj K., Agoropoulou C., Leyk M., Zhang-Auberson L., et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:387–401. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Pappu R., Schwab S.R., Cornelissen I., Pereira J.P., Regard J.B., Xu Y., Camerer E., Zheng Y.W., Huang Y., Cyster J.G., et al. Promotion of lymphocyte egress into blood and lymph by distinct sources of sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science. 2007;316:295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.1139221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Schwab S.R., Cyster J.G. Finding a way out: Lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nat. Immunol. 2007;8:1295–1301. doi: 10.1038/ni1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Pelletier D., Hafler D.A. Fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:339–347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct1101691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Mehling M., Brinkmann V., Antel J., Bar-Or A., Goebels N., Vedrine C., Kristofic C., Kuhle J., Lindberg R.L., Kappos L. FTY720 therapy exerts differential effects on T cell subsets in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2008;71:1261–1267. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000327609.57688.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Serpero L.D., Filaci G., Parodi A., Battaglia F., Kalli F., Brogi D., Mancardi G.L., Uccelli A., Fenoglio D. Fingolimod modulates peripheral effector and regulatory T cells in MS patients. J. Neuroimmune. Pharmacol. 2013;8:1106–1113. doi: 10.1007/s11481-013-9465-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Dominguez-Villar M., Raddassi K., Danielsen A.C., Guarnaccia J., Hafler D.A. Fingolimod modulates T cell phenotype and regulatory T cell plasticity in vivo. J. Autoimmun. 2019;96:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Engelhardt B., Kappos L. Natalizumab: Targeting alpha4-integrins in multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener. Dis. 2008;5:16–22. doi: 10.1159/000109933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Yednock T.A., Cannon C., Fritz L.C., Sanchez-Madrid F., Steinman L., Karin N. Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against alpha 4 beta 1 integrin. Nature. 1992;356:63–66. doi: 10.1038/356063a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Stuve O., Bennett J.L. Pharmacological properties, toxicology and scientific rationale for the use of natalizumab (tysabri) in inflammatory diseases. CNS Drug Rev. 2007;13:79–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2007.00003.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Kivisakk P., Healy B.C., Viglietta V., Quintana F.J., Hootstein M.A., Weiner H.L., Khoury S.J. Natalizumab treatment is associated with peripheral sequestration of proinflammatory T cells. Neurology. 2009;72:1922–1930. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a8266f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Coisne C., Mao W., Engelhardt B. Cutting edge: Natalizumab blocks adhesion but not initial contact of human T cells to the blood-brain barrier in vivo in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2009;182:5909–5913. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Berger B., Baumgartner A., Rauer S., Mader I., Luetzen N., Farenkopf U., Stich O. Severe disease reactivation in four patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after fingolimod cessation. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015;282:118–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Hatcher S.E., Waubant E., Nourbakhsh B., Crabtree-Hartman E., Graves J.S. Rebound syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis after cessation of fingolimod treatment. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:790–794. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Gueguen A., Roux P., Deschamps R., Moulignier A., Bensa C., Savatovsky J., Heran F., Gout O. Abnormal inflammatory activity returns after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2014;85:1038–1040. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-307591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Sorensen P.S., Koch-Henriksen N., Petersen T., Ravnborg M., Oturai A., Sellebjerg F. Recurrence or rebound of clinical relapses after discontinuation of natalizumab therapy in highly active MS patients. J. Neurol. 2014;261:1170–1177. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7325-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Campagnolo D., Dong Q., Lee L., Ho P.R., Amarante D., Koendgen H. Statistical analysis of pml incidences of natalizumab-treated patients from 2009 to 2016: Outcomes after introduction of the stratify JCV(r) dxselect antibody assay. J. Neurovirol. 2016;22:880–881. doi: 10.1007/s13365-016-0482-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Bloomgren G., Richman S., Hotermans C., Subramanyam M., Goelz S., Natarajan A., Lee S., Plavina T., Scanlon J.V., Sandrock A., et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1870–1880. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Ruck T., Bittner S., Wiendl H., Meuth S.G. Alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis: Mechanism of action and beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:16414–16439. doi: 10.3390/ijms160716414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Milo R. The efficacy and safety of daclizumab and its potential role in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2014;7:7–21. doi: 10.1177/1756285613504021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Wiendl H., Gross C.C. Modulation of il-2ralpha with daclizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013;9:394–404. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.European Medicines Agency Home Page. [(accessed on 18 May 2018)]; Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/zinbryta.
- 205.European Medicines Agency Home Page. [(accessed on 19 January 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/lemtrada.
- 206.Hauser S.L., Bar-Or A., Comi G., Giovannoni G., Hartung H.P., Hemmer B., Lublin F., Montalban X., Rammohan K.W., Selmaj K., et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:221–234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Montalban X., Hauser S.L., Kappos L., Arnold D.L., Bar-Or A., Comi G., de Seze J., Giovannoni G., Hartung H.P., Hemmer B., et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:209–220. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Gingele S., Jacobus T.L., Konen F.F., Hummert M.W., Suhs K.W., Schwenkenbecher P., Ahlbrecht J., Mohn N., Muschen L.H., Bonig L., et al. Ocrelizumab depletes CD20(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. Cells. 2018;8:12. doi: 10.3390/cells8010012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Holley J.E., Bremer E., Kendall A.C., de Bruyn M., Helfrich W., Tarr J.M., Newcombe J., Gutowski N.J., Eggleton P. CD20+ inflammatory T-cells are present in blood and brain of multiple sclerosis patients and can be selectively targeted for apoptotic elimination. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2014;3:650–658. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Bittner S., Wiendl H. Neuroimmunotherapies targeting T cells: From pathophysiology to therapeutic applications. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13:4–19. doi: 10.1007/s13311-015-0405-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.McInnes I.B., Mease P.J., Kirkham B., Kavanaugh A., Ritchlin C.T., Rahman P., van der Heijde D., Landewe R., Conaghan P.G., Gottlieb A.B., et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-interleukin-17a monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (FUTURE 2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1137–1146. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61134-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Langley R.G., Elewski B.E., Lebwohl M., Reich K., Griffiths C.E., Papp K., Puig L., Nakagawa H., Spelman L., Sigurgeirsson B., et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis--results of two phase 3 trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:326–338. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1314258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Fernandez O., Alvarez-Cermeno J.C., Arnal-Garcia C., Arroyo-Gonzalez R., Brieva L., Calles-Hernandez M.C., Casanova-Estruch B., Comabella M., Garcia-Merino J.A., Izquierdo G., et al. Review of the novelties presented at the 29th congress of the european committee for treatment and research in multiple sclerosis (ECTRIMS) (iii) Rev. Neurol. 2014;59:371–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.van der Heijde D., Cheng-Chung Wei J., Dougados M., Mease P., Deodhar A., Maksymowych W.P., Van den Bosch F., Sieper J., Tomita T., Landewe R., et al. Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis or radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in patients previously untreated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (COAST-V): 16 week results of a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392:2441–2451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31946-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.van der Heijde D., Gladman D.D., Kishimoto M., Okada M., Rathmann S.S., Moriarty S.R., Shuler C.L., Carlier H., Benichou O., Mease P.J. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from a phase iii study (SPIRIT-P1) J. Rheumatol. 2018;45:367–377. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]