Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2020 Feb 3;9(2):412. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020412

Sorting Rare ALS Genetic Variants by Targeted Re-Sequencing Panel in Italian Patients: OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1 Variants Account for 3% of Rare Genetic Forms

Viviana Pensato 1,2,, Stefania Magri 1,, Eleonora Dalla Bella 2, Pierpaola Tannorella 1, Enrica Bersano 2, Gianni Sorarù 3, Marta Gatti 1, Nicola Ticozzi 4,5, Franco Taroni 1, Giuseppe Lauria 2,6, Caterina Mariotti 1,*, Cinzia Gellera 1
PMCID: PMC7073901  PMID: 32028661

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset progressive neurodegenerative disease due to motor neuron loss variably associated with frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Next generation sequencing technology revealed an increasing number of rare and novel genetic variants and interpretation of their pathogenicity represents a major challange in the diagnosis of ALS. We selected 213 consecutive patients with sporadic or familial (16%) ALS, tested negative for SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and C9orf72 mutations. To reveal rare forms of genetic ALS, we performed a comprehensive multi-gene panel screening including 46 genes associated with ALS, hereditary motor neuronopathies, spastic paraplegia, and FTD. Our study allowed the identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 4.2% of patients. The genes with the highest percentage of pathogenic variants were OPTN (1%), VCP (1%) SQSTM1(1%), SETX (0.4%), FIG4 (0.4%), and GARS1 (0.4%) genes. We also found 49 novel or rare gene variants of unknown significance in 30 patients (14%), 44 unlikely pathogenic variants (39%), and 48 variants in ALS susceptibility genes. The results of our study suggest the screening of OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1 genes in routine diagnostic investigations for both sporadic and familial cases, and confirm the importance of diagnosis and couselling for patients and their relative family members.

Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, next generation sequencing, gene panel, genetic heterogeneity, mutation screening

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a severe neurodegenerative multisystem disorder characterized by loss of spinal, bulbar, and cortical motoneurons, leading to progressive and generalized paralysis. Death occurs within 3 to 5 years of onset, generally from respiratory complications [1]. The disease course may be variable and clinical presentation may include cognitive dysfunctions and behavioral changes resulting in the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia [2]. ALS is an orphan disease with an incidence of 1–2 individuals per 100,000 each year in most countries, and a prevalence of about 5 cases per 100,000. The majority of the patients are sporadic (SALS), but in 10–20% of cases, the disease has a familial recurrence (FALS) implying a causative inheritable defect [3]. The absence of a suggestive family history, however, does not exclude a genetic cause for ALS, especially in small sized families and considering incomplete penetrance. The percentage of SALS caused by genetic variants ranges from 11% to 28% in populations of European ancestry [4,5].

Historically, the genetic studies in ALS began with the identification of missense mutations in SOD1 (superoxide dismutase 1) gene in several families displaying an autosomal dominant transmission of the disease [6]. Clinical-genetic investigations demonstrated that SOD1 is responsible for 20% of FALS and 3% of SALS, supporting the hypotesis of genetic heterogeneity in the disease.

Over the last decade, the availability of next-generation high-throughput sequencing (NGS) revealed an increasing number of new ALS-associated genes, including causative genes, genetic modulating factors for symptom severity and/or progression, and susceptibility variants possibly increasing the risk of developing the disease [7,8].

The most frequent genetic cause of ALS was found to be a large hexanucleotide repeat expansion in an intronic region of the C9orf72 gene [9,10]. This molecular defect accounts for approximately 40% of FALS cases and 5–10% of SALS. Other frequent ALS causative genes are FUS (5% FALS and < 1% SALS), and TARDBP (3% FALS and 2% SALS) [7,11,12,13,14,15]. In a percentage of ALS patients, more than one potentially pathogenic variant can be identified, suggesting an oligogenic basis of the disease with a dose-dependent gene-burden effect [16]. Recent studies proposed a multistep pathogenic model with subsequent intervening etiological events including genetic and environmental factors [17]. This model also implies that the number of steps necessary to start the neurodegenerative process in genetically mediated ALS may be reduced compared to cases without mutation, and the number of steps being variable according to the mutated gene [17,18]. Several ALS genes show pleiotropy and are associated with different clinical entities ranging from non-neurological diseases, such as glaucoma and bone diseases to ALS mimicking phenotypes such as motor neuropathies, spinal muscular atrophy, and distal myopathies [19]. Thus, it could be important to clarify whether other motor neuron disease genes may influence the pathology of genetic ALS [20]. In the view of the abundant and various genetic involvements in ALS, it is remarkable that a considerable percentage of individuals with positive family history remains without the identification of a genetic defect, suggesting a wider heterogeneity in the spectrum of the disease.

In this study we propose an NGS genetic approach to search for rare ALS gene variants in patients in which genetic defects in SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and C9orf72 have been excluded. The aim is to reveal causative genetic factors related to ALS in a representative cohort of Italian patients, to contribute in the characterization of overlapping clinical phenotypes and improve accuracy in diagnosis and genetic counseling for this rare group of diseases.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients

Patients participating in this study were 213 unrelated ALS Italian subjects (126 men, 59%). This comprised a retrospective consecutive series of patients in which SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP gene mutations and the hexanucelotide repeat expansions in C9orf72 were previously excluded. Mean age at genetic screening was of 59 ± 13 years. Thirty-four index subjects (16%) reported a positive family history for motor neuron disease. The Ethics Standard Committee of our institution approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Genetic Screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from venous peripheral blood lymphocytes by standard procedures. Preliminary mutational screening for SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and C9orf72 genes variants was performed as previously described [10,13,14]. Next-generation sequencing was performed by either one of the following custom gene panels: a) amplicon-based customized NGS panel (Illumina TrueSeq Custom Amplicon, TSCA) covering 48 ALS/FTD genes (143 index cases); b) probe-based customized panel (Illumina Nextera Rapid Capture Custom kit, Illumina) covering 78 genes, including ALS/FTD causative and susceptibility genes, hereditary motor neuronopathy (HMN), and hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) genes (71 index cases). For the purposes of the study, the same set of 46 genes common for the two NGS panels were analyzed: ALS2, ANG, APEX1, ASAH1, ATXN2, BSCL2, CHCHD10, CHMP2B, CRYM, CYP27A1, DAO, DCTN1, DPP6, ELP3, EPHA4, ERBB4, FIG4, FUS, GARS1, GRN, HNRNPA1, HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPA3, IGHMBP2, MAPT, MATR3, NEFH, NEK1, OPTN, PFN1, PNPLA6, REEP1, SETX, SIGMAR1, SOD1, SPAST, SPG11, SQSTM1, TAF15, TARDBP, TREM2, TRPV4, TUBA4A, UBQLN2, VAPB, VCP (Table 1). The prescreened SOD1, FUS, TARDBP genes were also included in the gene sequencing panel, as internal control. Reference sequences for transcript (NM) and protein (NP) are reported in Supplementary Table S1.

Table 1.

Genes analyzed in this study.

ALS Gene Protein Disease[OMIM] Inherit.
ALS1 SOD1 Superoxide Dismutase [Cu-Zn] Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 1 [MIM:105400] AD
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 1 [MIM:105400] D90A; D96N AR
ALS2 ALS2 Alsin Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2 [MIM:205100] AR
Infantile-onset ascending spastic paralysis (IAHSP) [MIM:607225] AR
Juvenile primary lateral sclerosis (JPLS) [MIM:606353] AR
ALS4 SETX Probable helicase senataxin Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 4, juvenile ALS [MIM:602433] AD
Spinocerebellar ataxia, 1 (SCAR1) [MIM:606002] AR
ALS5 SPG11 Spatacsin Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 5, juvenile [MIM:602099] AR
Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, axonal type 2X(CMT2X) [MIM:616668] AR
Spastic paraplegia 11, (SPG11) [MIM:604360] AR
ALS6 FUS RNA-binding protein FUS Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 6, +/- FTD [MIM:608030] AD
Tremor, hereditary essential 4 (ETM4) [MIM:614782] AD
ALS8 VAPB Vesicle-associated membrane protein-B/C Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 8 [MIM:608627] AD
Spinal muscular atrophy, late-onset, (SMAFK) [MIM:182980] AD
ALS9 ANG Angiogenin Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 9; [MIM:611895] AD
ALS10 TARDBP TAR DNA-binding protein 43 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 10, +/- FTD [MIM:612069] AD
ALS11 FIG4 Polyphospho inositide phosphatase Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 11 [MIM:612577] AD
Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease 4J (CMT4J) [MIM:611228] AR
Polymicrogyria, bilateral temporooccipital (BTOP) [MIM:612691] AR
ALS12 OPTN Optineurin Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 12 [MIM:613435] AR/AD
Glaucoma 1, open angle, E (GLC1E) [MIM:137760] AD
ALS14 VCP Transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 14, +/- FTD [MIM:613954] AD
Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, type 2Y (CMT2Y) [MIM:616687] AD
Inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease +/- FTD [MIM:167320] AD
ALS15 UBQLN2 Ubiquilin-2 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 15, +/- FTD [MIM:300857] XLD
ALS16 SIGMAR1 Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 16, juvenile [MIM:614373] AR
Distal spinal muscular atrophy, 2 (DSMA2) [MIM:605726] AR
ALS17 CHMP2B Charged multivesicular body protein 2b Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 17 [MIM:614696] AD
FTD chromosome 3-linked (FTD3) [MIM:600795] AD
ALS18 PFN1 Profilin-1 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 18 [MIM:614808] AD
ALS19 ERBB4 Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-4 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 19 [MIM:615515] AD
ALS20 HNRNPA1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 20 [MIM:615426] AD
Inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease +/- FTD3 [MIM:615424] AD
ALS21 MATR3 Matrin-3 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 21 [MIM:606070] AD
ALS22 TUBA4A Tubulin alpha-4A chain Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 22, +/- FTD [MIM:616208] AD
FTDALS2 CHCHD10 Coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 10, mitochondrial FTD +/- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2 [MIM:615911] AD
Isolated Mitochondrial Myopathy (IMMD) [MIM:616209] AD
Spinal muscular atrophy, Jokela type (SMAJ) [MIM:615048] AD
FTDALS3 SQSTM1 Sequestosome-1 FTD +/- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 3 [MIM:616437] AD
Ataxia, dystonia, gaze palsy[MIM:617145] AR
Myopathy distal, with rimmed vacuoles [MIM:617158] AD
Paget disease of bone 3 (PDB3) [MIM:167250] AD
ALS suscep ATXN2 Ataxin-2 {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, susceptibility to, 13} [MIM:183090] AD
Spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2) [MIM:183090] AD
ALS suscep APEX1 apurinic/apyrimidinic endodeoxyribonuclease1
ALS suscep CRYM Ketimine reductase mu-crystallin Deafness, autosomal dominant 40 (DFNA40) [MIM:616357] AD
ALS suscep CYP27A1 Sterol 26-hydroxylase, Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) [MIM:213700] AR
ALS suscep DAO D-amino-acid oxidase
ALS suscep DCTN1 Dynactin subunit 1 {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, susceptibility to} [MIM:105400]
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 7B (HMN7B) [MIM:607641] AD
Perry syndrome (PERRYS) [MIM:168605] AD
ALS suscep DPP6 Dipeptidyl-aminope-peptidase-like protein 6 Mental retardation, autosomal dominant 33 (MRD33) [MIM:616311] AD
ALS suscep ELP3 Elongator Acetyltransferase Complex Subunit 3
ALS suscep EPHA4 Ephrin type-A receptor 4
ALS suscep HNRNPA2B1 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteinsA2/B1 Inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease +/- FTD [MIM:615422]
ALS suscep HNRNPA3 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleo-protein A3
ALS suscep NEFH Neurofilament heavy polypeptide {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, susceptibility to} [MIM:105400]
Charcot–Marie–Tooth, axonal, type 2CC (CMT2CC) [MIM:616924] AD
ALS suscep NEK1 Serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek1 Short-rib thoracic dysplasia 6 +/- polydactyly(SRTD6) [MIM:263520] AR
ALS suscep TAF15 TATA-binding protein-associated factor 2N Chondrosarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid [MIM:612237]
ALS suscep TREM2 Triggering receptor expressed myeloid cells2 Polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy (PLOSL) [MIM:221770] AR
FTD GRN Granulins FTD with ubiquitin-positive inclusions ([MIM:607485] AD
Aphasia, primary progressive [MIM:607485] AD
Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 11 (CLN11) [MIM:614706] AR
FTD MAPT Microtubule-associated protein tau Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [MIM:600274] AD
Pick disease of the brain (PIDB) [MIM:172700] AD
Progressive supranuclear palsy 1 (PSNP1) [MIM:601104] AD
Parkinson-dementia syndrome (PARDE) [MIM:260540] AR
SMA ASAH1 Acid ceramidase Farber lipogranulomatosis (FRBRL) [MIM:228000] AR
Spinal muscular atrophy, progressive myoclonic epilepsy[MIM:159950] AR
HMN/HSP BSCL2 Seipin Lipodystrophy congenital generalized type 2 (CGL2) [MIM:269700] AR
Encephalopathy progressive, +/- lipodystrophy (PELD) [MIM:615924] AR
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 5A (HMN5A) [MIM:600794] AD
Spastic paraplegia 17, (SPG17) [MIM:270685] AD
HMN GARS1 Glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 2D (CMT2D) [MIM:601472] AD
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 5A (HMN5A) [MIM:600794] AD
HMN IGHMBP2 Immunoglobulin mu-binding protein 2 Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease 2S (CMT2S) [MIM:616155] AR
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 6 (HMN6) [MIM:604320] AR
HMN/HSP PNPLA6 Neuropathy target esterase Boucher–Neuhauser syndrome (BNHS) [MIM:215470] AR
Laurence-Moon [MIM:245800];Oliver-McFarlane [MIM:275400] AR
Spastic paraplegia 39 (SPG39) [MIM:612020] AR
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 5B (HMN5B) [MIM:614751] AR
HSP REEP1 Receptor expression-enhancing protein1 Spastic paraplegia 31 (SPG31) [MIM:610250] AD
HSP SPAST Spastin Spastic paraplegia 4 (SPG4) [MIM:182601] AD
HMN TRPV4 Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V4 Digital arthropathy-brachydactyly, familial (FDAB) [MIM:606835] AD
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, 8 (HMN8) [MIM:600175] AD
Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy (SPSMA) [MIM:181405] AD

ALS suscep: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis susceptibility genes; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; HMN: hereditary motor neuronopathy; HSP: hereditary spastic paraplegia; FTD frontotemporal dementia; MIM, Mendelian Inheritance in Man; IBMPFD inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease +/- FTD; AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; XLD, X-linked dominant. +/- with or without.

2.3. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

Sequencing of enriched libraries was performed using an Illumina MiSeq sequencing device with paired end approach. Data analysis was performed using: a) MiSeq Reporter software (Illumina), for quality control, alignment against hg19 reference genome and variant calling; b) VariantStudio software (Illumina), public variation databases (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database 137 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project 6500 (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS), 1000 Genomes project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/1000-genomes-browsers/), Exome Aggregation Consortium (Exome Aggregation Consortium) and Human Gene Mutation Pro Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php) and an in-house database, for variants annotation; c) CLC Genomics Workbench software (CLCbio, Qiagen), for quality control and coverage analysis.

Variants were filtered with the following criteria: (i) variants in the coding region or in the flanking 20 bp that were (ii) absent or rare with minor allele frequency (MAF) < 1% in the population databases (dbSNP137, NHLBI E SP6500, 1000 Genomes project, and ExAC).

Taking into account the very low prevalence of ALS disease, the genetic variants with frequency > 1% in dbSNP or in Exome Variant Server or ExAC were classified as Class-1, and were escluded from subsequent analyses. In silico prediction of synonymous or intronic variants effect on splice site was performed using at least three splice prediction tools: NNSplice predictor; http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html; http://wangcomputing.com/assp/. Best candidate variants were verified using Sanger methods. In subject heterozygous for a single likely pathogenic gene variant in recessive genes, we screened exon and intron-exon boundary sequences and gene copy number to search for a possible second mutation.

The genetic variants passing the filtering process were classified as “pathogenic” (Class-5), “likely pathogenic”(Class-4), “variants of unknown significance” (VUS, Class-3), and “unlikely pathogenic variants” (Class-2), according to criteria derived from a modified version of the classification proposed by Antoniadi et al. [21] (Supplementary Table S2).

3. Results

We identified a total of 160 variants in 117 out of 213 index cases (55%).

Ninenteen variants (17%) were classified as pathogenic (n = 11) or likely pathogenic (n = 8). Ten of these latter variants (Class 4–5) were in autosomal dominant ALS genes: OPTN (2), VCP (2); SQSTM1 (2) SETX (1), GARS1 (1), FIG4 (2). The remaining nine were heterozygous variants identified in autosomal recessive genes: ALS2 (1), SIGMAR1 (1), ASAH1 (1), IGHMBP2 (5), PNPLA6 (1). These patients screened negative for a second mutation in exon and intron-exon boundary sequences or gene copy number variants.

We also identified forty-nine VUS (44%, Class-3), and 44 unlikely pathogenic variants (39%, Class-2). No gene variants were detected in APEX1, BSCL2, CHCHD10, HNRNPA1, HNRNPA2B1, PFN1, REEP1, TAF15, and TUBA4 genes, and, in the prescreened FUS, SOD1, TARDBP genes (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of identified gene variants and classes of pathogenicity.

Gene N. of Variants Class 5 Class 4 Class 3 Class 2 Recurrent Variants
ALS (AD) ANG 4 1 3 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
CHCHD10 0
CHMP2B 1 1
ERBB4 4 2 2 * * 1 recurrent in 2 pts
FIG4 4 1 1 2
HNRNPA1 0
MATR3 1 1
OPTN 3 2 1
PFN1 0
SETX 21 1 6 14 * * 1 recurrent in 7 pts
* 1 recurrent in 5 pts
SQSTM1 6 2 1 3 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
TUBA4A 0
VAPB 3 3 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
VCP 4 2 2
ALS (XLD) UBQLN2 1 1
ALS (AR) ALS2 4 1 3
SIGMAR1 1 1
SPG11 7 3 4
HMN/HSP (AD) BSCL2 0
GARS1 9 1 5 § 3 * § 1 recurrent in 3 pts
* 1 recurrent in 3 pts
REEP1 0
TRPV4 9 3 6 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
SPAST 1 1
SMA/HMN/HSP (AR) ASAH1 3 1 2
IGHMBP2 10 4 1 4 1
PNPLA6 6 1 5
FTD (AD) GRN 8 4 4* * 1 recurrent in 4 pts
MAPT 2 2
Total 112 11 8 49 44 10 recurrent variants
(9 Class-2, 1 Class-3)

Specific DNA and protein variants of Classes 3-4-5 are listed in Table 4; Table 5. Class-2 variants are listed in Supplementary Table S5. §: recurrent variants of class 3; *: recurrent variants of class 2.

Forty-eight variants were found in ALS susceptibility genes (Table 3). Six variants were recurrent: the c.1472A>G in ATXN2 (2 patients), the synonimous ATXN2 variant c.3000A>G (7 patients), the c.47A>C in CRYM gene (2 patients), the c.3529 + 5G>A in DCTN1 (3 patients), the c.196-7T>G in HNRNPA3 (3 patients), and the c.1054C>A NEFH gene variant (4 patients) (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 3.

Total gene variants identified in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) susceptibility genes.

Gene Number of Variants
ALS susceptibility genes APEX1
ATXN2 14 * * 1 recurrent in 2 pts
* 1 recurrent in 7 pts
CRYM 2 * * 1 recurrent in 2 pts
CYP27A1 4
DAO 1
DCTN1 10 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
DPP6 1
ELP3 2
EPHA4 2
HNRNPA2B1
HNRNPA3 5 * * 1 recurrent in 3 pts
NEFH 4 * * 1 recurrent in 4 pts
NEK1 1
TAF15
TREM2 2
Total 48 6 recurrent variants

Specific DNA and protein variants in susceptibility genes are listed in Supplementary Table S3. *: recurrent variants.

After classification of all gene variants, the patients were stratified according to the carried variant with the highest pathogeneicity class in ALS/FTD/HMN-HSP genes.

Nine patients carried pathogenetic or likely patogenetic variants in ALS/HMN genes (4.2%), 18 subjects carried heterozygous Class-3 variant in autosomal dominant or X-linked ALS genes (8.4%), and 12 patients (5.6%) had heterozygous variants in FTD/HMN-HSP genes. Eleven patients showed the coexistence of multiple variants of Class ≤ 3. Only one Class-3 variant (GARS1 c.303G>A; p.Arg101His) was recurrent in two patients.

Fourty-two patients (20%) carried only variants in ALS susceptibility genes (Supplementary Table S3); 18 subjects (8.4%) carried heterozygous variant in autosomal recessive ALS genes (Supplementary Table S4), and others 18 patients (8.4%) had only Class-2 variants (Supplementary Table S5). None of the index patient had more than one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in autosomal dominant ALS genes. No recurrent Class 4-5 variants were identified in our series (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gene variants and their estimated pathogeneicity class in a cohort of 213 Italian ALS patients tested negative for the most frequent ALS causative genes. Values represent the relative contribution of mutations in ALS genes, other motor neuron disease genes, and gene associated with frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

Clinical Phenotypes of Patients with Class-3 to Class-5 Gene Variants

For 9 patients carrying Class-4 and Class-5 gene variants, the molecular findings supported a probable diagnosis of genetic ALS: two were subjects carrying different heterozygous Class-5 missense variants in OPTN, two subjects had different pathogenic Class-5 variants in VCP gene, one patient was compound heterozygous for a Class-4 and a Class-5 FIG4 variant (P100), two subjects carried a Class-4 missense variant and a splicing variant in SQSTM1 (P002, and P103), and one subject carried a Class-4 heterozygous GARS1 gene variant (c.1955G>A; p.Gly652Glu, P073) (Table 4). Thirty patients carried variants of unknown significance (Class-3) in ALS/HMN/FTD genes. For these patients, a definite genetic cause for the disease could not be ascertained (Table 5).

Table 4.

Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in ALS genes (Classes 4 and 5).

Gene Class Variant
DNA
Variant
Protein
MAF % * dbSNP Additional Variants Clinical Notes Patient Ref.
OPTN 5 c.941A>T p.Gln314Leu 0%-0.02%-0.01% rs142812715 (AR) ALS2: c.331G>A (p.Val111Ile) het [rs61745503, MAF *: 0.04%-0.02%-0.03%] (Class3) Bulbar-Spinal ALS laboratory supported P087 [22,23]
OPTN 5 c.1442C>T p.Ala481Val 0%-0.01%-0% rs377219791 Spinal ALS-laboratory supported P015 [24,25]
VCP 5 c.277C>T p.Arg93Cys 0%-0%-0% Spinal ALS, no FTD, no Paget P072 [26,27]
VCP 5 c.463C>T p.Arg155Cys 0%-0%-0% rs121909330 (AR) IGHMBP2: c.2911_2912delAG (p.Arg971GlufsTer4) het [rs572973851; rs724159994, MAF *: 0%-0.82%-0.02%] (Class5) Spinal ALS, no FTD, no Paget P008 [28,29]
SQSTM1 4 c.695C>T p.Pro232Leu 0%-0%-0% rs757778292 (Suscep.) DAO: c.627G>A (p.Trp209Ter) het [rs766258671, MAF*: 0%-0%-0% ]
(Suscep.) DCTN1: c.652G>A(p.Glu218Lys) het [MAF *: 0%-0%-0%]
Bulbar ALS, onset 43 years P002
SQSTM1 4 c.301 + 4delA p.? HSF: Alteration of the WT donor site, most probably affecting splicing. 0%-0%-0% (AR) IGHMBP2: c.2176G>A (p.Val726Met) het [rs143986510, MAF *: 0.02%-0.08%-0.04%] (Class3) ALS P103
FIG4 5
4
c.122T>C
c.1667C>T
p.Ile41Thr
p.Thr556Ile
0.08%-0.11%-0.1%
0%-0%-0%
rs121908287
Juvenile ALS with predominant upper motor neuron involvement P100 [30]
SETX 4 c.2750T>C p.Met917Thr 0%-0.01%-0.01% rs376022544 ALS P022 [5]
GARS1 4 c.1955G>A p.Gly652Glu 0%-0%-0% rs747080824 ALS
Pseudo-polyneuritic type
P073

* MAF (minor allele frequency) % in 1000Genomes-Go-ESP-ExAC. Het: heterozygous; HSF: Human Splicing Finder; (Suscep.): variants in ALS susceptibility genes; (AR): variants in autosomal recessive genes.

Table 5.

Variants of unknown significance (VUS) in ALS/HMN/FTD genes (Class 3).

Gene Class Variant
DNA
Variant
Protein
MAF % * dbSNP Additional Variants Clinical Notes Patient
OPTN 3 c.910C>T p.Leu304Phe 0%-0%-0% (Suscep.) ATXN2: c.3000A > G (p =) het [rs140262591, MAF *: 0.2%-0.31%-0.3%] Spinal ALS P075
VCP 3 c.179A>G p.Lys60Arg 0%-0%-0% (Suscep.) ATXN2: c.3322C > T (p.Pro1108Ser) het [rs140242317, MAF *: 0.04%-0.11%-0.07% ] Slowly progressive ALS with cognitive impairment P112
VCP 3 c.1696-3C>T p.? 0%-0.01%-0.01% rs372638909 Rapidly progressive ALS with cognitive impairment P025
FIG4 3 c.646G>A p.Gly216Arg 0%-0%-0% rs759566206 (Class 2) SQSTM1: c.712A > G (p.Lys238Glu) het [rs11548633, MAF *: 0.24%-0.26%-0.24%] Progressive muscular weakness and sensory neuropathy P105
FIG4 3 c.1243C>G p.Pro415Ala 0%-0%-0% (Class 3) GARS1: c.302G > A (p.Arg101His) het [rs200887429, MAF *: 0.02%-0.02%-0.04%];
(Class 2) SETX: c.4660T > G (p.Cys1554Gly) het [rs112089123, MAF *: 0.58%-0.31%-0.58%]
Spastic quadriplegia P106
SQSTM1 3 c.833C>T p.Thr278Ile 0%-0%-0% rs200445838 Myopathy P043
UBQLN2 3 c.809G>A hem p.Arg270His 0%-0%-0% rs767597171 Spinal ALS (Flail arm) P017
SETX 3 c.-114-2A>G p.? 0.08%-0%-0% rs560095915 Bulbar ALS, onset 43 years P079
SETX 3 c.934A>G p.Ile312Val 0%-0%-0% Spinal ALS, onset 67 years P045
SETX 3 c.2344G>T p.Val782Leu 0%-0%-0% (AR) ALS2: c.37G > A (p.Gly13Arg) het [rs367871772, MAF *: 0%-0.01%-0.01%] (Class 4); Lower motor neuron involvement, onset 21 years P071
SETX 3 c.3494C>G p.Ser1165Cys 0%-0%-0% Spinal ALS, onset 72 years P029
SETX 3 c.4220A>G p.Asn1407Ser 0%-0%-0% rs747050949 Bulbar ALS, onset 79 years P069
SETX 3 c.4957A>G p.Lys1653Glu 0%-0%-0% Spinal ALS, onset 66 years P088
ANG 3 c.61C>T p.Pro21Ser 0%-0.02%-0.02% rs149672657 (HMN) TRPV4: c.1006C > T (p.Arg336Cys) het [rs781229110, MAF *: 0%-0%-0%] (Class 3);
(Class 2) SQSTM1: c.712A > G (p.Lys238Glu) het [rs11548633, MAF *: 0.24%-0.26%-0.24%]
(Class 2) SETX: c.3229G > A (p.Asp1077Asn) het [rs145097270, MAF *: 0.08%-0.07%-0.11%]
Spinal ALS P094
CHMP2B 3 c.36T>G p.Asp12Glu 0%-0%-0% (Class 2) GRN: c.264+7G > A (p = ?)het [rs60100877, MAF *: 0.5%-0.6%-0.53%] Spinal ALS, onset 71 years P074
ERBB4 3 c.421 + 5G>A p.? HSF: Alteration of the WT donor site, most probably affecting splicing 0%-0%-0% rs778195807 - P024
NRBB4 3 c.1441A>G p.Ile481Val 0%-0.01%-0% rs368860175 Bulbar ALS, onset 70. One affected sibling P092
MATR3 3 c.1132G>A p.Ala378Thr 0%-0.03%-0.01% rs201075828 Spinal ALS, onset 37 years P099
GARS1 3 c.302G>A p.Arg101His 0.02%-0.02%-0.04% rs200887429 - P005
GARS1 3 c.302G>A p.Arg101His 0.02%-0.02%-0.04% rs200887429 Spinal ALS P030
GARS1 3 c.571A>T p.Thr191Ser 0%-0%-0% rs760133861 (Class 2) GARS1: c.803C > T (p.Thr268Ile) het [rs2230310, MAF *: 0.12%-0.48% 0.32% Spinal ALS P062
GARS1 3 c.1159G>A p.Ala387Thr 0%-0%-0% rs776528885 Bulbar ALS and FTD P065
GRN 3 c.-8 + 7G>C p? 0%-0%-0% Bulbar ALS P054
GRN 3 c.329G>A p.Arg110Gln 0.02%-0.01%-0.01% rs375439809 Neuroacanthocytosis P110
GRN 3 c.1528C>T p.Arg510Cys 0%-0%-0% rs747873577 Spinal ALS P034
GRN 3 c.1691G>A p.Arg564His 0%-0%-0% Spinal ALS P035
MAPT 3 c.64G>A p.Asp22Asn 0%-0%-0% rs745662662 (AR) IGHMBP2: c.2362C > T (p.Arg788Ter) het [rs199839840, MAF *: 0%-0.01%-0% (Class5) Spinal ALS P059
MAPT 3 c.319G>A p.Gly107Ser 0%-0%-0% rs769901930 Spinal ALS and mild cognitive impairment P057
TRPV4 3 c.113A>G p.Asn38Ser 0.02%-0%-0% rs527355587 (Class 2) TRPV4: c.2518G > A (p.Glu840Lys) het [rs55728855, MAF *: 0.24%-0.74%-0.63% ALS monomelic type P033
TRPV4 3 c.1496C>T p.Pro499Leu 0.02%-0%-0% rs115358347 - P093

* MAF% (minor allele frequency) in 1000Genomes-Go-ESP–ExAC. Hem: hemizygous; het: heterozygous; HSF: Human Splicing Finder; (Suscep.): variants in susceptibility genes; (AR): variants in autosomal recessive genes; (HMN): variants in motor neuronopathy disease genes. het: heterozygous; (AR): variants in autosomal recessive genes.

OPTN Gene

A 60 year old patient (P087) was positive for the previously described p.Gln314Leu missense heterozygous variant (Class-5) in the OPTN gene [22]. The patient presented, at age 59, progressive bulbar deficit with functional impairment of swallowing and speech. Neuropsychological evaluation showed mild depression and emotional liability. EMG showed active denervation in the bulbar district and hand muscles. The OPTN gene variant p.Gln314Leu has been described so far in two patients with motor neuron disease [22,23], and in 1/400 control subjects aged >56 years. In our “in house” database, we only observed this genetic variant in one unrelated ALS subject and in none of the 280 controls [22]. Another patient (P015) carried the previously described p.Ala481Val OPTN Class-5 missense variant. The patient was a 61-year old man presenting muscle cramps, fasciculation, increased creatine kinase (CK), progressive muscle weakness, and diffuse hyperreflexia. His mother had the diagnosis of Parkinson disease. This variant was previoulsy described in an heterozygous patient with ALS [24] and in an FTD patient who was a compound heterozygote for the p.Gln235* nonsense and the p.Ala481Val mutation [25]. A third patient carried a novel Class-3 OPTN variant, p.Leu304Phe, predicted to be deleterious at SIFT (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant)and PolyPhen-2 prediction programs. The patient (P075) presented spasticity and muscle weakness and wasting at the age of 72, and was dignosed as having ALS at age 75. EMG showed diffuse signs of active denervation. The mother was referred to be affected by Alzheimer disease.

VCP Gene

Two patients carried previously described Class-5 heterozygous VCP variants: the p.Arg93Cys [26,27] and the p.Arg155Cys [28,29]. The patient carrying the p.Arg93Cys VCP variant (P072), presented gait difficulties at age of 47. The disease had a progressive course and at age 60 he was not able to walk independelty, had severe muscle wasting in four limbs. No bubar signs or cognitive decline were reported, but the mother and two maternal uncles were diagnosed with Alzheimer disease. A brother had the diagnosis of ALS and Paget disease.The patient carrying the p.Arg155Cys VCP gene variant (P008) had an early onset of the disease at 42 years. He presented severe and diffuse muscle weakness, muscle wasting, and fasciculations. CK level was 255 U/L (n.v. 24–195). EMG showed chronic neurogenic changes and active denervation. The mother and a maternal aunt were reported to have mild muscle weakness at lower limbs, but no specific diagnosis was made. The patient had no bone alterations or cognitive impairement. Neuropsychological tests reveal only mild deficit of episodic memory. Brain MRI was normal and the muscle biopsy showed a few fibers with rimmed vacuoles and cores. Two other patients carried Class-3 VCP variants: a 69 year old woman (P112), heterozygous for the missense p.Lys60Arg VCP variant, presented slowly progressive bulbar and limb muscle weakness and spasticity associated with cognitive decline. The second patient (P025), a 76 year old man heterozygous for the c.1696-3C>T VCP splicing variant, presented diffuse muscle weakness and wasting, cognitive and behavioral difficulties. He died one year later from disease complications.

SQSTM1 Gene

Two subjects aged 43 and 74, (P002, and P103) carried likely pathogenic variants (Class-4) in SQSTM1 gene. Both patients, aged 43 and 74, were sporadic cases and presented with clinical features consistent with the diagnosis of possible ALS (Table 4). A third patient carried a Class-3 SQSTM1 gene variant. Her presenting phenotype was characterized by diffuse and severe muscle weakness, but subsequent clinical evaluations excluded ALS disease and suggested a possible diagnosis of acquired myopathy.

FIG4 Gene

In a 27-year-old female patient (P100), genetic screening revealed a compound heterozygosity for two FIG4 missense variants: c.122T>C (p.Ile41Thr) and c.1667C>T (p.Thr556Ile). She had a clinical diagnosis of juvenile ALS with predominant upper motor neuron involvement. Clinical and molecular data of this patient was already reported by Bertolin et al. [30]. The c.122T>C pathogenic variant (Class-5) was previously reported in compound heterozygosis in a patient affected by Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 4J [31,32]. The c.1667C>T is a novel variant that causes the substitution of a highly conserved amino acid and was classified as Class-4. In silico studies predicted a damaging effect on protein function. FIG4 variants of Class-3 were detected in two patients. Both patients were sporadic and had different phenotypes: one subject, aged 64, presented progressive muscular wasting and peripheral neuropathy (P105), and the second case was a 39 year old woman with spastic quadriplegia since the age of 29 (P106).

SETX Gene

In patient P022, we identified a SETX Class-4 variant (c.2750T>C; p.Met917Thr) that was previously reported in an ALS patient [5]. Our patient was a 71-year-old woman presenting a bulbar onset of the disease and a severe and progressive muscular weakness and wasting. Six additional patients carried Class-3 SETX variants (Table 5). All patients were sporadic and 5 out of 6 had a classical ALS phenotype with ages at onset ranging from 43 to 79 years. One patient (P071) had a juvenile onset of slowly progressive lower motor neuron involvement.

GARS1 Gene

A rare missense likely pathogenic variant was identified in the GARS1 gene (c.1955G>A; p.Gly652Glu) predicted to be deleterious (PolyPhen-2: probably_damaging; SIFT: deleterious). Patient P073 was first evaluated at 58 years because of right foot drop without pain or sensory abnormalities. EMG showed active denervation in right tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum, with normal distal conduction velocities. Lumbar MRI showed foraminal stenosis at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. At last evaluation, four years after symptom onset, electrophysiological studies showed severe motor axonopathy at lower limbs with active and chronic denervation signs. Motor evoked potentials disclosed reduction of the amplitude with normal latencies at four limbs, while sensory evoked potentials were normal. Based on neurophysiological data and signs of upper motor neuron involvement, a diagnosis of ALS pseudopolyneuritic type was made. Four additional patients carried GARS1 heterozygous missense variants classified as VUS. These subjects showed involvement of both upper and lower motor neurons, and one patient had bulbar onset ALS associated with FTD.

4. Discussion and Conclusion

Our knowledge about the genetic of ALS has significantly improved over the last years and the presence of causative genetic variants has been extensively investigated in different populations. The most frequently recognized disease causing mutations are found in C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP, and FUS genes. In the patients referred to our center, including more than 400 ALS subjects, the repeat expansion in the C9orf72 gene is detected in 7.3% of cases, SOD1 gene variants in 4%, TARDBP in 1%, and FUS gene variants in 0.2% of cases. Similar percentages of causative variants in these major ALS genes were reported in other series of ALS patients [33]. In the present study, we selected 213 consecutive ALS patients negative for mutations in SOD1, FUS, TARDBP, and C9orf72, and we performed an extensive targeted NGS screening to diagnose rare forms of genetic ALS. The ALS/FTD associated genes that have been examined represent an almost complete analysis of the current list, excluding TBK1. A major difficulty in NGS analyses was the interpretation of the pathogenicity of the novel variants. Our variant classification was based on a modified version of the criteria proposed by Antoniadi et al. [21] for the diagnosis of inherited peripheral neuropathies with more restrictive criteria for the frequency of the reported variants.

Our classification consideres most of the criteria recommeded in the guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants privided by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [34], including population databases, in silico prediction tools, in-house variant database, and the appropriate scientific literature. However, due to predominance of late onset sporadic ALS cases in our cohort, we could not reliably count on the criteria based of segregation analysis and functional studies.

Our study allowed the identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 4.2% of patients. This result is consistent with that reported in other high-throughput sequencing studies in which the contribution of the major ALS genes was excluded.

In fact, despite the large number of ALS screened genes and the vast number of identified variants, the diagnosis of rare genetic forms of ALS usually ranges from 4% to 5% of cases [35,36,37,38]. In recent studies on ALS patients from different populations, rare gene variants were reported in SETX (0.3–2%), ANG (0–1%), OPT (0.2–1%), ALS2 (0.3–1.5%), VCP (0.2–0.3%), UBQLN2 (0–0.7%), CHCHD10 (0.7%), VAPB (0–0.3%), and NEFH (0–0.3%) [35,36,37,38].

In our survey, the genes with the highest percentage of pathogenic variants were OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1.

Mutations in OPTN were firstly reported to be causative of a primary open-angle glaucoma (MIM:137760), and subsequently Maruyama et al. [39] described different types of mutations (both homozygous and heterozygous) in ALS. We identified two OPTN Class-5 variants (1%), the p.Gln314Leu [22,23] and the p.Ala481Val [24,25]. The first OPTN gene variant was previously detected in two unrelated ALS patients, and in 1 out of 400 control subjects. The occurrence of the variant in a patient from our series seems to confirm its pathogenic role, although variable penetrance could also been considered [23]. The second p.Ala481Val OPTN variant was previously described in an heterozygous ALS patient from a Canadian cohort [24], and in a 64-year-old patient with FTD from a different study [25]. This latter subject was a compound heterozygote for two OPTN variants including the missense p.Ala481Val and the p.Gln235* nonsense mutation [25]. Our 61 year-old patient was a sporadic case with a clinical phenotype resembling that of the patient reported by Belzil et al., being primarely characterized by spinal ALS without evidence of cognitive impairment [24].

Two patients (1%) carried previously described Class-5 heterozygous VCP variants: the p.Arg93Cys [26,27] and the p.Arg155Cys [28,29]. Mutations in the valosin-containing protein, an ATPase involved in protein degradation and autophagy, have previously been identified in families with inclusion body myopathy, Paget’s disease, and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD, MIM:167320). Johnson et al. [40] described for the first time VCP mutations in ALS cases, including patients belonging to a four-generation Italian family. In a cohort of 231 individuals carrying VCP mutations, Al-Obeidi et al. reported myopathy in 90% of patients, Paget’s disease of bone in 42%, frontotemporal dementia in 30%, and ALS phenotype in approximately 9% of patients [41]. The phenotype in our two cases was consistent with previously described patients with unequivocal upper and lower motor neuron involvement, at the ages of 47 and 42 years, without FTD or Paget’s disease. The VCP p.Arg93Cys variant, identified in patient P072, was previously reported in a 70-year-old patient with a diagnosis of distal myopathy and rimmed vacuoles [27], and in several subjects from a single family in which three subjects presented cognitive impairement and myopathy, and three others had Paget’s disease [26]. In our case, the mother and two maternal uncles were diagnosed with Alzheimer disease, and a brother had the diagnosis of ALS and Paget disease. The second Class-5 VCP variant (p.Arg155Cys) was also reported in several families with IBMPFD [28,29]. The clinical phenotype of our patient (P008) was characterized by progressive motor neuron impairement and, interestingly, rimmed vacules at muscle biopsy morphological evaluation.

The third gene responsible for ALS disease in our study was SQSTM1 (1%). Also, this gene has been associated with a wide spectrum of phenotypes. In 2002, a recurrent non-conservative change in SQSTM1 (p.Pro392Leu) was reported in a high proportion of French Canadian patients affected by Paget disease [42]. Subsequently heterozygous mutations in SQSTM1 were reported in patients presenting ALS, in patients with ALS, and FTD or Paget disease, and in a patient with isolated distal rimmed-vacuole myopathy [43,44,45,46,47]. In our SQSTM1 mutated patients, the clinical phenotype was characterized by typical ALS disease, with no signs of bone abnormalities or FTD.

Finally, pathogenic variants were identified in the autosomal dominant genes SETX (0.4%), FIG4 (0.4%), and GARS1 (0.4%). Heterozygous missense variants in SETX were suggested to cause a rare autosomal dominant form of juvenile ALS (MIM:602433) with onset <25 years and a slow rate of disease progression [48]. In our cohort, we identified seven SETX gene variants: six were classified as VUS, and the p.Met917Thr variant was classified as likely pathogenic (Class-4) because already reported in an ALS patient [5]. The authentic contribution of this variant to ALS disease, as well as for other SETX heterozygous variants reported in ALS, remains to be further investigated and proven. The p.Met917Thr SETX variant is reported in population databases, and in our case, was associated with a late onset and rapidly progressive ALS phenotype. In several NGS studies, there is an abundance of SETX variants, mostly identified in sporadic with the typical late-onset ALS phenotype [5,35,49]. Due to the relatively high detection rate of heterozygous SETX variants both in patients and controls, it is still controversial if this gene may contribute to a substantial proportion of genetic ALS or if it should be rather considered as a susceptibility genetic factor. A clear pathogenic role is demonstrated for biallelic mutations in SETX for a recessive form of cerebellar ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 2 (AOA2, MIM:606002). In AOA2 families, an increase incidence of ALS disease in SETX heterozygous family members has not been reported.

GARS1 and FIG4 genes are both associated with either ALS or hereditary neuropathy [31,50,51,52]. Clinical and neurophysiological data of our patients confirmed the involvement of both upper and lower motor neurons, supporting the association with the ALS phenotype.

We also reported the identification of 49 novel or rare variants in 19 different genes, whose pathogenetic significance could not be presently determined. These VUS involved 30 patients for which genetic counseling remains challenging and genetic informations might need periodic reevaluation. The same difficulties can be shared for the 48 variant identified in ALS susceptibility genes. For ATXN2, we describe missense variants, but an increased risk of developing ALS disease has been associated, so far, only with alleles carrying long sequences of repeated CAG triplets [53]. Thus, the possible role in ALS susceptibility for rare missense variants within other coding regions is not yet defined. With the advent of NGS technology, an increasingly number of rare genetic variants are being identified in known ALS genes and the genetic architecture of ALS is emerging in all its complexity. Even though the use of a targeted panel is cost effective to screen a large list of genes, the classification of all identified variants and segregation studies are critical procedures requiring time and resources. For timely diagnoses and genetic counseling, it could be useful to consider the reported frequencies of causative genes to prioritize the analyses of rare pathogenic variants.

The results of our study highlight the relative contribution of OPTN, VCP, and SQSTM1 variants in rare forms of genetic ALS, suggesting the screening of these genes during routine diagnostic investigations in both sporadic and familial ALS cases.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the Italian ALS patients participating in the study and their caregivers for support. V.P.; P.T. and C.G. have been partially supported for this work by Fondazione Regionale per la Ricerca Biomedica (Regione Lombardia, Grant FRRB 2015-0023 to G.L.) and by the Italian Ministry of Health (Grant RF 2013-02355764 to CG).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/2/412/s1, Table S1: Reference sequences for transcript (NM) and protein (NP) of genes analyzed in the study; Table S2: Criteria applied in the classification of variants identified in ALS genes; Table S3: Gene variants in ALS susceptibility genes; Table S4: Heterozygous gene variants in autosomal recessive ALS genes; Table S5: Class-2 gene variants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.L. and C.G.; Data curation: V.P., S.M., E.D.B., P.T., M.G., G.S. and C.M.; Formal analysis: S.M. and C.G.; Funding acquisition: G.L.and C.G.; Investigation: V.P., E.D.B., P.T., E.B., G.S., N.T.and C.M.; Methodology:V.P., S.M., M.G. and F.T.; Supervision: N.T., F.T., G.L. and C.G.; Writing—original draft: C.M. and C.G.; Writing—review & editing: M.G., F.T., G.L., C.M. and C.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Hardiman O., Al-Chalabi A., Chio A., Corr E.M., Logroscino G., Robberecht W., Shaw P.J., Simmons Z., Van Den Berg L.H. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:17071. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Chalabi A., Hardiman O., Kiernan M.C., Chiò A., Rix-Brooks B., Van Den Berg L.H. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Moving towards a new classification system. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1182–1194. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown R.H., Al-Chalabi A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:162–172. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1603471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Renton A.E., Chiò A., Traynor B.J. State of play in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genetics. Nat. Neurosci. 2014;17:17–23. doi: 10.1038/nn.3584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cady J., Allred P., Bali T., Pestronk A., Goate A., Miller T.M., Mitra R.D., Ravits J., Harms M.B., Baloh R.H. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset is influenced by the burden of rare variants in known amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes. Ann. Neurol. 2015;77:100–113. doi: 10.1002/ana.24306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosen D.R., Siddique T., Patterson D., Figlewicz D.A., Sapp P., Hentati A., Donaldson D., Goto J., O’Regan J.P., Deng H.X., et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;362:59–62. doi: 10.1038/362059a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Su X.W., Broach J.R., Connor J.R., Gerhard G.S., Simmons Z. Genetic heterogeneity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Implications for clinical practice and research. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49:786–803. doi: 10.1002/mus.24198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Al-Chalabi A., Hardiman O. The epidemiology of ALS: A conspiracy of genes, environment and time. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013;9:617–628. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cruts M., Gijselinck I., Van Langenhove T., van der Zee J., Van Broeckhoven C. Current insights into the C9orf72 repeat expansion diseases of the FTLD/ALS spectrum. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ratti A., Corrado L., Castellotti B., Del Bo R., Fogh I., Cereda C., Tiloca C., D’Ascenzo C., Bagarotti A., Pensato V., et al. C9ORF72 repeat expansion in a large Italian ALS cohort: Evidence of a founder effect. Neurobiol. Aging. 2012;33:2528.e7–2528.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sreedharan J., Blair I.P., Tripathi V.B., Hu X., Vance C., Rogelj B., Ackerley S., Durnall J.C., Williams K.L., Buratti E., et al. TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2008;319:1668–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.1154584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kwiatkowski T.J., Bosco D.A., Leclerc A.L., Tamrazian E., Vanderburg C.R., Russ C., Davis A., Gilchrist J., Kasarskis E.J., Munsat T., et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2009;323:1205–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.1166066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Corrado L., Ratti A., Gellera C., Buratti E., Castellotti B., Carlomagno Y., Ticozzi N., Mazzini L., Testa L., Taroni F., et al. High frequency of TARDBP gene mutations in italian patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Hum. Mutat. 2009;30:688–694. doi: 10.1002/humu.20950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Corrado L., Del Bo R., Castellotti B., Ratti A., Cereda C., Penco S., Sorarù G., Carlomagno Y., Ghezzi S., Pensato V., et al. Mutations of FUS gene in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Med. Genet. 2010;47:190–194. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.071027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ticozzi N., Silani V., LeClerc A.L., Keagle P., Gellera C., Ratti A., Taroni F., Kwiatkowski T.J., McKenna-Yasek D.M., Sapp P.C., et al. Analysis of FUS gene mutation in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis within an Italian cohort. Neurology. 2009;73:1180–1185. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bbff05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marangi G., Traynor B.J. Genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: New genetic analysis methodologies entailing new opportunities and challenges. Brain Res. 2015;1607:75–93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al-Chalabi A., Calvo A., Chio A., Colville S., Ellis C.M., Hardiman O., Heverin M., Howard R.S., Huisman M.H.B., Keren N., et al. Analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as a multistep process: A population-based modelling study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1108–1113. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70219-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chiò A., Mazzini L., D’Alfonso S., Corrado L., Canosa A., Moglia C., Manera U., Bersano E., Brunetti M., Barberis M., et al. The multistep hypothesis of ALS revisited: The role of genetic mutations. Neurology. 2018;91:e635–e642. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Campanari M.-L., Bourefis A.-R., Kabashi E. Diagnostic challenge and neuro-muscular junction contribution to ALS pathogenesis. Front. Neurol. 2019;10:68. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al-Chalabi A., Van Den Berg L.H., Veldink J. Gene discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Implications for clinical management. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017;13:96–104. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Antoniadi T., Buxton C., Dennis G., Forrester N., Smith D., Lunt P., Burton-Jones S. Application of targeted multi-gene panel testing for the diagnosis of inherited peripheral neuropathy provides a high diagnostic yield with unexpected phenotype-genotype variability. BMC Med. Genet. 2015;16:84. doi: 10.1186/s12881-015-0224-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Del Bo R., Tiloca C., Pensato V., Corrado L., Ratti A., Ticozzi N., Corti S., Castellotti B., Mazzini L., Sorarù G., et al. Novel optineurin mutations in patients with familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2011;82:1239–1243. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2011.242313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Black H.A., Leighton D.J., Cleary E.M., Rose E., Stephenson L., Colville S., Ross D., Warner J., Porteous M., Gorrie G.H., et al. Genetic epidemiology of motor neuron disease-associated variants in the Scottish population. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;51:e11–e178. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Belzil V.V., Daoud H., Desjarlais A., Bouchard J.P., Dupré N., Camu W., Dion P.A., Rouleau G.A. Analysis of OPTN as a causative gene for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2011;32:555.e13–555.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pottier C., Bieniek K.F., Finch N.C., van de Vorst M., Baker M., Perkersen R., Brown P., Ravenscroft T., van Blitterswijk M., Nicholson A.M., et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals important role for TBK1 and OPTN mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration without motor neuron disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;130:77–92. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1436-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guyant-Maréchal L., Laquerrière A., Duyckaerts C., Dumanchin C., Bou J., Dugny F., Le Ber I., Frébourg T., Hannequin D., Campion D. Valosin-containing protein gene mutations: Clinical and neuropathologic features. Neurology. 2006;67:644–651. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000225184.14578.d3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shi Z., Hayashi Y.K., Mitsuhashi S., Goto K., Kaneda D., Choi Y.C., Toyoda C., Hieda S., Kamiyama T., Sato H., et al. Characterization of the Asian myopathy patients with VCP mutations. Eur. J. Neurol. 2012;19:501–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stojkovic T., Hammouda E.H., Richard P., de Munain A.L., Ruiz-Martinez J., Gonzalez P.C., Laforêt P., Pénisson-Besnier I., Ferrer X., Lacour A., et al. Clinical outcome in 19 French and Spanish patients with valosin-containing protein myopathy associated with Paget’s disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2009;19:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Watts G.D.J., Wymer J., Kovach M.J., Mehta S.G., Mumm S., Darvish D., Pestronk A., Whyte M.P., Kimonis V.E. Inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia is caused by mutant valosin-containing protein. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:377–381. doi: 10.1038/ng1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bertolin C., Querin G., Bozzoni V., Martinelli I., De Bortoli M., Rampazzo A., Gellera C., Pegoraro E., Sorarù G. New FIG4 gene mutations causing aggressive ALS. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018;25:e41–e42. doi: 10.1111/ene.13559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chow C.Y., Zhang Y., Dowling J.J., Jin N., Adamska M., Shiga K., Szigeti K., Shy M.E., Li J., Zhang X., et al. Mutation of FIG4 causes neurodegeneration in the pale tremor mouse and patients with CMT4J. Nature. 2007;448:68–72. doi: 10.1038/nature05876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nicholson G., Lenk G.M., Reddel S.W., Grant A.E., Towne C.F., Ferguson C.J., Simpson E., Scheuerle A., Yasick M., Hoffman S., et al. Distinctive genetic and clinical features of CMT4J: A severe neuropathy caused by mutations in the PI(3,5)P 2 phosphatase FIG4. Brain. 2011;134:1959–1971. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zou Z.Y., Zhou Z.R., Che C.H., Liu C.Y., He R.L., Huang H.P. Genetic epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2017;88:540–549. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and Guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kenna K.P., McLaughlin R.L., Byrne S., Elamin M., Heverin M., Kenny E.M., Cormican P., Morris D.W., Donaghy C.G., Bradley D.G., et al. Delineating the genetic heterogeneity of ALS using targeted high-throughput sequencing. J. Med. Genet. 2013;50:776–783. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Müller K., Brenner D., Weydt P., Meyer T., Grehl T., Petri S., Grosskreutz J., Schuster J., Volk A.E., Borck G., et al. Comprehensive analysis of the mutation spectrum in 301 German ALS families. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2018;89:817–827. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morgan S., Shoai M., Fratta P., Sidle K., Orrell R., Sweeney M.G., Shatunov A., Sproviero W., Jones A., Al-Chalabi A., et al. Investigation of next-generation sequencing technologies as a diagnostic tool for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2015;36:1600.e5–1600.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nishiyama A., Niihori T., Warita H., Izumi R., Akiyama T., Kato M., Suzuki N., Aoki Y., Aoki M. Comprehensive targeted next-generation sequencing in Japanese familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;53:194.e1–194.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maruyama H., Morino H., Ito H., Izumi Y., Kato H., Watanabe Y., Kinoshita Y., Kamada M., Nodera H., Suzuki H., et al. Mutations of optineurin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 2010;465:223–226. doi: 10.1038/nature08971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Johnson J.O., Mandrioli J., Benatar M., Abramzon Y., Van Deerlin V.M., Trojanowski J.Q., Gibbs J.R., Brunetti M., Gronka S., Wuu J., et al. Exome Sequencing Reveals VCP Mutations as a Cause of Familial ALS. Neuron. 2010;68:857–864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Al-Obeidi E., Al-Tahan S., Surampalli A., Goyal N., Wang A.K., Hermann A., Omizo M., Smith C., Mozaffar T., Kimonis V. Genotype-phenotype study in patients with valosin-containing protein mutations associated with multisystem proteinopathy. Clin. Genet. 2018;93:119–125. doi: 10.1111/cge.13095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laurin N., Brown J.P., Morissette J., Raymond V. Recurrent mutation of the gene encoding sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1/p62) in paget disease of bone. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002;70:1582–1588. doi: 10.1086/340731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fecto F., Yan J., Vemula S.P., Liu E., Yang Y., Chen W., Zheng J.G., Shi Y., Siddique N., Arrat H., et al. SQSTM1 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2011;68:1440–1446. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rubino E., Rainero I., Chio A., Rogaeva E., Galimberti D., Fenoglio P., Grinberg Y., Isaia G., Calvo A., Gentile S., et al. SQSTM1 mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2012;79:1556–1562. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e25df. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hirano M., Nakamura Y., Saigoh K., Sakamoto H., Ueno S., Isono C., Miyamoto K., Akamatsu M., Mitsui Y., Kusunoki S. Mutations in the gene encoding p62 in Japanese patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2013;80:458–463. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fe5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Le Ber I., Camuzat A., Guerreiro R., Bouya-Ahmed K., Bras J., Nicolas G., Gabelle A., Didic M., De Septenville A., Millecamps S., et al. SQSTM1 Mutations in french patients with frontotemporal dementia or frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:1403–1410. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.3849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bucelli R.C., Arhzaouy K., Pestronk A., Pittman S.K., Rojas L., Sue C.M., Evilä A., Hackman P., Udd B., Harms M.B., et al. SQSTM1 splice site mutation in distal myopathy with rimmed vacuoles. Neurology. 2015;85:665–674. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chen Y.Z., Bennett C.L., Huynh H.M., Blair I.P., Puls I., Irobi J., Dierick I., Abel A., Kennerson M.L., Rabin B.A., et al. DNA/RNA helicase gene mutations in a form of juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS4) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;74:1128–1135. doi: 10.1086/421054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hirano M., Quinzii C.M., Mitsumoto H., Hays A.P., Roberts J.K., Richard P., Rowland L.P. Senataxin mutations and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2011;12:223–227. doi: 10.3109/17482968.2010.545952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chow C.Y., Landers J.E., Bergren S.K., Sapp P.C., Grant A.E., Jones J.M., Everett L., Lenk G.M., McKenna-Yasek D.M., Weisman L.S., et al. Deleterious Variants of FIG4, a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, in Patients with ALS. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;84:85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Antonellis A., Ellsworth R.E., Sambuughin N., Puls I., Abel A., Lee-Lin S.-Q., Jordanova A., Kremensky I., Christodoulou K., Middleton L.T., et al. Glycyl tRNA Synthetase Mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 2D and Distal Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type V. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003;72:1293–1299. doi: 10.1086/375039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Corcia P., Brulard C., Beltran S., Marouillat S., Bakkouche S.E., Andres C.R., Blasco H., Vourc’h P. Typical bulbar ALS can be linked to GARS mutation. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2019;20:275–277. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2018.1556699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sproviero W., Shatunov A., Stahl D., Shoai M., van Rheenen W., Jones A.R., Al-Sarraj S., Andersen P.M., Bonini N.M., Conforti F.L., et al. ATXN2 trinucleotide repeat length correlates with risk of ALS. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;51:178.e1–178.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES