Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):188. doi: 10.3390/foods9020188

Table 2.

Scores of actors related to six questions of the food fraud vulnerability assessment regarding ethical business culture and criminal history of the own company, supplier and branch of industry 1.

Actor. Ethical Business Culture Own Company Ethical Business Culture Supplier Ethical Business Culture Branch of Industry Criminal Offences Own Company Criminal Offences Supplier Historical Evidence Branch of Industry
BAN1 1 1 1 1 1 1
BAN2 1 1 1 1 1 1
BAN3 1 1 1 1 1 1
BAN4 1 1 1 1 1 3
BAN5 1 2 2 1 2 3
EGG1 1 2 3 1 2 2
EGG2 1 1 2 1 1 1
EGG3 1 2 2 1 2 2
EGG4 1 1 1 1 1 2
EGG5 1 2 3 1 1 2
OO1 1 1 2 1 1 3
OO2 1 2 3 2 1 3
OO3 1 2 1 2 1 2
OO4 1 2 2 1 1 3
OO5 1 1 2 2 1 3
PORK1 1 1 2 1 1 3
PORK2 1 1 1 1 1 3
PORK3 1 1 1 1 3 3
PORK4 1 1 1 1 3 1
PORK5 1 1 1 1 3 3

1 Scores indicate vulnerability levels of answers provided by the actors: 1 = low, 2 = medium, 3 = high. Actors are indicated by their supply chain code followed by a number (e.g., BAN1): BAN = organic bananas, EGG = organic eggs, OO = organic olive oil, PORK = organic pork.