Skip to main content
New Microbes and New Infections logoLink to New Microbes and New Infections
. 2020 Feb 16;35:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100661

Prevalence of metallo-β-lactamase–producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from diabetic foot infections in Iraq

MK Al-Khudhairy 1,, MMM Al-Shammari 2
PMCID: PMC7076140  PMID: 32194966

Abstract

Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of nosocomial infections. However, there is little information in Iraq regarding its prevalence in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Carbapenems are efficient antibiotics against extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing P. aeruginosa. However, there are many potential health risks associated with carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. We aimed to determine MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolated from diabetic foot ulcer infections. A total of 97 P. aeruginosa isolates were isolated from pus and deep tissue swabs of 282 patients admitted to Al-Sader hospital, Najaf City, Iraq, with diabetic foot infections from October 2017 to January 2018. All P. aeruginosa isolates were tested by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for evaluating 13 antibiotics. Phenotypic carbapenem resistance was confirmed by the combined disc test, double-disc synergy test, modified Hodge test and CHROMagar KPC agar. All phenotypic MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for blaIMP, blaNDM, blaSIM, blaSPM and blaVIM genes by multiplex PCR. Of the 97 P. aeruginosa isolates, combined disc test and modified Hodge test revealed 12 isolates (12.4%) to be MBL producers, and ten (10.3%) displayed MBL production as accessed by CHROMagar KPC agar test. Nine isolates (9.3%) were carbapenemase producers by the imipenem and ceftizoxime double-disc synergy test. Of 12 phenotypic MBL-producing P. aeruginosa, PCR amplification confirmed 4 (33.3%) and 3 (25%) isolates harbouring blaVIM and blaIMP gene respectively, but none carried the blaNDM, blaSIM or blaSPM genes. The steady and rapid increase of MBL production is worrisome and needs to be controlled through extensive studies and more judicious selection of antibiotics, especially carbapenems.

Keywords: Diabetic foot infections, metallo-β-lactamase, pseudomonas aeruginosa

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is a disorder that affects many people as a complex and serious disease [1,2]. More than 439 million people are diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, which causes a high rate of mortality and morbidity around the world [1]. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is an important cause of complications of diabetes mellitus, which leads to the development of wet gangrene, causing inevitable limb amputation [2]. Determination of causative agents is crucial to selecting appropriate and accurate therapy. Various pathogens have been isolated, depending on local studies and geographic variations. Although in North America and Europe Gram-positive species like Staphylococcus aureus are predominant, in Asia Gram-negative species like Pseudomonas aeruginosa are predominant [3,4]. The complications of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa have caused a major health concern among patients with DFU. In the most recent decade, high rates of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing P. aeruginosa have been observed in many hospitalized patients with DFU, leading to lower-extremity amputation [3]. Major mechanisms of carbapenem resistance among P. aeruginosa include the loss of porin OprD and production of carbapenemases. Carbapenem nonsusceptibility, particularly facilitated through plasmids and extrachromosomal elements, has limited therapeutic options against serious Gram-negative infections [4,5]. Considering the vulnerability of patients with DFU, early diagnosis of DFU and appropriate selection of antimicrobial therapy are essential for controlling diabetic foot infections and preventing complications.

We evaluated the MBL-producing MDR P. aeruginosa in infected DFUs and their sensitivity profiles in Al-Najaf City, Iraq.

Patients and methods

Patients

The study population was defined as 282 patients with DFU infections admitted to Al-Sader Hospital, Al-Najaf City, Iraq, from October 2017 to January 2018. Information was gathered regarding patient demographic and clinical features such as gender, age, type of diabetes, wound size, random blood sugar level, nature of ulcer, location of the lesion and amputation.

Characterization of bacterial isolates

Wound exudates and pus were obtained using deep swab techniques of the wound area. The specimens were inoculated on brain–heart infusion agar, MacConkey agar and blood agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) plates for the isolation bacteria. The individual colonies were isolated, and the identification was performed according to our standard medical microbiology laboratory’s analysis of DFU [2].

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns

Susceptibility of 97 isolates to antipseudomonal antibiotics was determined by the disc diffusion method. In vitro susceptibility test was performed for 13 antipseudomonal agents: piperacillin (PI, 75 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (PIT, 100 μg), ceftazidime (CA, 30 μg), ceftizoxime (CZX, 30 μg), aztreonam (AT, 30 μg), imipenem (IPM, 10 μg), polymyxin B (PB, 300 U), gentamicin (GEN, 10 μg), colistin (Col, 10 μg), tobramycin (TOB, 10 μg), amikacin (AK, 30), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg) and levofloxacin (LE, 5 μg) (HiMedia). Analysis of each isolate was conducted by modifying the Kirby-Bauer method. The zone of inhibition was measured according to recommendations by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [6].

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

The imipenem and meropenem MIC was determined using the agar dilution method according to CLSI 2017.

Phenotypic detection of MBL

Modified Hodge test

The turbidity of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 inoculum was standardized to match 0.5 McFarland and streaked on to a Müller-Hinton agar (MHA) plate as a lawn. The imipenem disc was placed exactly in the middle of the lawn. Each test isolate was seeded carefully in a straight line from edge to edge between the imipenem disc and the lawn plate. Appearance of a cloverleaf shape was considered MBL positive [6].

Carba-NP test

The Carba-NP test was implemented according to CLSI 2017. Briefly, DDH2O, phenol red and MgSO4 were mixed, and imipenem was added. Next, after being formed in to aliquots, 100 μL of overnight colony culture of isolate was inoculated in the tube and incubated for 2 to 4 hours. Carbapenemase-producing isolates would alter the colour to yellow.

Combined disc test

The inoculum of test isolate was diluted by adjusting the 0.5 McFarland turbidity and was inoculated on a MHA plate. The imipenem (10 μg) disc was combined with 8 μL EDTA, and the ceftizoxime (30 μg) disc was also combined with 8 μL EDTA. The distances between the substrates and the inhibitor discs from center to center were tested as follows: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 cm. The appearance of an enhanced zone ≥8 mm between the substrate and inhibitor discs compared to the substrate discs alone was considered to be a positive result for MBL production [7,8].

Double-disc synergy test

Imipenem (10 μg) and EDTA (750 μg) discs were carefully placed on inoculated MHA with the test isolate. The space between the center of the imipenem and EDTA discs was 20 mm. Enhancement of the inhibition zone in the distance between both discs compared to the inhibition zone on the far side of imipenem disc was reported as an MBL-positive result [9].

Streaking on CHROMagar KPC agar

All isolates were streaked on CHROMagar KPC agar and incubated at 37°C overnight, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MBL-producing P. aeruginosa colonies appeared translucent cream to blue.

Molecular methods

DNA was extracted according to the instruction of the Genomic DNA Mini Kit manufacturer (Geneaid, New Taipei City, Taiwan). PCR detection of the blaIMP, blaNDM, blaSIM, blaSPM and blaVIM genes was conducted using primers described previously [10]. PCR was performed with 12.5 μL of master mix, 5 μL DNA template and 0.5 μL of each primer (Kapa, Cape Town, South Africa) containing 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase in a total final volume of 20 μL. A thermocycler instrument (A&B, Singapore) was used with the reaction conditions (Table 1).

Table 1.

Primers used in multiplex PCR for determining MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Target gene Direction Primer sequence (5′→3′) Amplicon size (bp)
blaIMP F GGAATAGAGTGGCTTAAYTCTC 232
R GGTTTAAYAAAACAACCACC
blaNDM F GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC 621
R TGGGTRAARTARGTSACCAGA
blaSIM F ACATTATCCGCTGGAACAGG 570
R TACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG
blaSPM F CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG 271
R AAAATCTGGGTACGCAAACG
blaVIM F GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA 390
R CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG

Reaction conditions and steps were as follows: initial denaturation, 94°C for 10 minutes; denaturation, 94°C for 30 seconds; annealing, 52°C for 40 seconds; extension, 72°C for 50 seconds; final extension, 72°C for 5 minutes; for 32 cycles.

F, forward; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase; R, reverse.

Results

Of 282 pus and exudate specimens screened, 97 (34.4%) P. aeruginosa were identified, of which 54 (55.7%) occurred in male and 43 (44.3%) in female subjects. The female-to-male ratio was 0.8. Age ranged from 30 to 70 years ( mean, 59 ± SD 3.3 years). The prevalence of age groups is shown in Fig. 1. In this study, 79 (81.44%) of 97 of P. aeruginosa were isolated from Wagner DFU wound grades II and III [2]. Seventy-six patients (78.4%) received antibiotics alone, whereas 21 (21.6%) underwent a surgical procedure with multiple antibiotics.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Histograms showing distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by (left) sex and (right) age.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The antibiotic susceptibility of isolates was shown in Table 2. All isolates were sensitive to colistin and polymyxin B. Isolates expressed varying degrees of resistance to aminoglycosides (18.6–28.9%) and fluoroquinolones (19.6–22.7%). Notably, 12 isolates (12.4%) were MDR, being resistant to four classes of antibiotics; all these isolates were MBL producers.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility results of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Antimicrobial class Antimicrobial agent N (%) P. aeruginosa isolates that are:
R I S
Penicillins Piperacillin 45 (46.4) 0 52 (53.6)
β-Lactam combination agents Piperacillin/tazobactam 41 (42.3) 0 56 (57.7)
Cephems Ceftazidime 40 (41.2) 0 57 (58.7)
Ceftizoxime 42 (43.3) 0 55 (56.7)
Monobactams Aztreonam 39 (40.2) 0 58 (50.8)
Carbapenems Imipenem 12 (12.4) 0 85 (87.6)
Lipopeptides Colistin 0 0 97 (100)
Polymyxin B 0 0 97 (100)
Aminoglycosides Gentamicin 28 (28.9) 4 (4.1) 65 (67.0)
Tobramycin 24 (24.7) 3 (3.1) 70 (72.2)
Amikacin 18 (18.6) 1 (1.0) 78 (80.4)
Fluoroquinolones Ciprofloxacin 22 (22.7) 2 (2.1) 73 (75.3)
Levofloxacin 19 (19.6) 2 (2.1) 76 (78.4)

I, intermediate; R, resistant; S, sensitive.

Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production

In this study, screening for MBL production using the Carba-NP test, combined disc test and modified Hodge test was performed, with 12 (12.4%) among which Carba-NP test had higher sensitivity. Ten isolates (10.3%) had positive result by CHROMagar KPC agar testing, whereas nine isolates (9.3%) were carbapenemase producers by the imipenem and ceftizoxime double-disc synergy test (Fig. 2, Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phenotypic detection of carbapenem resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with diabetic foot infections.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phenotypic detection of metallo-β-lactamase by various tests. (A) Modified Hodge test had positive result, giving rise to a cloverleaf pattern around imipenem (IPM, 10 μg) disc by isolates 7, 13, 22, 23, 43, 57 and 83. (B) Combined disc test’s imipenem disc produced large synergistic inhibition zone towards imipenem (10 μg/8 μL EDTA) disc by isolate no. 22 (top half of plate); ceftizoxime (CZX, 30 μg) disc produced large synergistic inhibition zone towards ceftizoxime (30 μg/8 μL EDTA) disc by isolate no. 7 (bottom half of plate).

Molecular detection of carbapenemases

Of 12 phenotypically MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates, four (33.3%) and three (25%) isolates harboured blaVIM and blaIMP genes respectively. Additionally, two isolates carried the blaSPM and blaSIM genes, and one carried the blaNDM gene. Multiple MBL gene carriage is shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Characteristics of 12 multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

Isolate no. Sex (age in years) blaVIM blaIMP blaNDM blaSIM blaSPM
1 F (51)
2 F (49) + +
3 M (36) +
4 M (68) + +
5 M (48)
6 F (57) +
7 M (62) +
8 F (65) + +
9 F (48)
10 M (53) +
11 M (49)
12 M (67) + +

Regarding receipt of prior antibiotic therapy, six of 12 and three of 12 had a history of β-lactam and fluoroquinolone receipt respectively.

Discussion

The inherent and extensive antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa has restricted therapeutic choices, necessitating proper considerations in tissue damage in DFU patients [5,11]. Carbapenem resistance has been widely studied around the world. However, local studies are scarce, and they fail to address the extent of the serious problem facing the health sector in our country. One of the local studies conducted by Al-Charrakh et al. [12] reported that 37.5% of MBL producers in different clinical samples were isolated from hospitals in Baghdad. Another study conducted by Yassin et al. [13] reported that 12.7% of MBL-producing P. aeruginosa were isolated from wound samples at Duhok Hospital, Iraq, and a low prevalence 3.95% of MBL producers was reported by Anoar et al. [14] from patients with burn infections in Sulaimani City, Iraq. To our knowledge, there is no local study about the MBL-producing P. aeruginosa rate from diabetic foot infections in Iraq or in Al-Najaf City.

The prevalence of MBL in the current study was 12 (12.4%) among the 97 P. aeruginosa isolates. It was nearly similar to the rates in the other studies, such as the prevalence of MBL producers of 10% in India, 12% in Canada, 12.7% in the United Arab Emirates, 13.4% in Russia and 14% in Spain [13,15]. Some studies have recorded various percentages of MBL-producing P. aeruginosa, such as 38.3% in São Luis of Brazil, 47.3% in Taiwan, 62% in Greece [16] and 53.2% in Iran [17]. Large outbreaks caused by carbapenem-resistant strains have been reported in Greece, Korea, Kenya, Canada and Italy [18,19]. The frequency of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa was increased from 1% to 28% between 2002 and 2006, particularly in Europe [20,21].

Although the results of our phenotypic methods were not entirely the same, they were convergent and can be applied in a complementary manner to molecular methods [22,23]. We had a limitation regarding lack of MIC of imipenem associated with the existence of genes.

All MBL-producing P. aeruginosa isolates were MDR and were resistant to β-lactams, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones.

The prevalence of the VIM and IMP genes in this study was 33.3% and 25% respectively, which was similar to the results of the other studies that have demonstrated that VIM and IMP are prevalent and common in Asian countries, Spain and other areas [24,25]. Similar results have been observed in some studies conducted in Iraq’s neighbouring countries such as Iran. For example, in the study by Azimi et al. [26], the common gene among MBL producers was IMP, which occurred at 17.5%, followed by 15.6% for the VIM gene. In another study from Iran, Salimi and Eftekhar [27] found VIM-1 and IMP-1 genes to be more common than other MBL-encoding genes. Saffari et al. [28] reported that 18% and 5.5% of MBL-producing P. aeruginosa were positive for the IMP and VIM genes, respectively. Radan et al. [29] documented that 74.3% of the MBL-producing isolates carried the IMP gene. Azimi et al. [30] believed the increase and widespread of the IMP and VIM genes among clinical P. aeruginosa contributed to several unpleasant nosocomial and healthcare-associated infections, the result of the potential spread of virulence genes among bacterial species through effective mechanisms such as horizontal gene transfer.

Several studies have demonstrated that the VIM gene in P. aeruginosa is the predominant MBL in Iraq [31]. These local studies determined the rate of the VIM and IMP genes to be 85% and 57% in Erbil [32]. However, the VIM gene was highly (94.4%) reported in Wasit [33], whereas Al-Charrakh et al. [12] detected no VIM gene in their study.

We observed that among patients infected with MBL-producing P. aeruginosa, six of 12 and three of 12 had a history of receipt of β-lactams and fluoroquinolone respectively.

However, studies in Columbia, Italy and Japan have revealed that regardless of prior antibiotic receipt, P. aeruginosa isolates carry the VIM and IMP genes [16,34]. It is notable that isolates harbouring the VIM and IMP genes are also resistant to quinolones, aminoglycosides and sulfonamides [16,25,35]. This phenotype is due to the carriage of mobile genetic cassettes and other determinants of resistance inserted into integrons [25].

Conclusion

The steady rapid increase of MBL production among nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates is worrisome and needs to be controlled through urgent and extensive studies. All our isolates were susceptible to colistin and polymyxin B.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We thank the DFU Center staff and patients at Al-Sader Hospital who participated in the study. This study was supported by Department of Community Health, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Kufa, Iraq.

References

  • 1.Olokoba A.B., Obateru O.A., Olokoba L.B. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of current trends. Oman Med J. 2012;27:269–273. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ansar S., Dastagir A. Bacteriological profile of diabetic foot ulcers. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2018;7:4997–5002. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Farhat N., McClung D., Nagel J. Risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in diabetic foot infections. InOpen Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(Suppl. 1):S108. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bush K. Past and present perspectives on β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(10) doi: 10.1128/AAC.01076-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pang Z., Raudonis R., Glick B.R., Lin T.J., Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:177–192. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 28th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA: 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Picão R.C., Andrade S.S., Nicoletti A.G. Metallo-β-lactamase detection: comparative evaluation of double-disk synergy versus combined disk tests for IMP, GIM-, SIM-, SPM-, or VIM-producing isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2028–2037. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00818-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dogonchi A.A., Ghaemi E.A., Ardebili A., Yazdansetad S., Pournajaf A. Metallo-β-lactamase mediated resistance among clinical carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in northern Iran: a potential threat to clinical therapeutics. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018;30:90–96. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_101_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee K., Lim Y.S., Yong D., Yum J.H., Chong Y. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4623–4629. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4623-4629.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Poirel L., Walsh T.R., Cuvillier V., Nordmann P. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;70:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vinodkumar C.S., Hiresave S., Kandagal Giriyapal B., Bandekar N. Metallo-β-lactamase producing pseudomonas aeruginosa and its association with diabetic foot. Indian J Surg. 2011;73:291–294. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0287-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Charrakh A.H., Al-Awadi S.J., Mohammed A.S. Detection of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from public and private hospitals in Baghdad, Iraq. Acta Med Iran. 2016;54:107–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yassin N.A., Khalid H.M., Hassan A.O. Prevalence of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in wound infections in Duhok City, Iraq. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2:1576–1579. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anoar K.A., Ali F.A., Omar S.A. Detection of metallo-β-lactamase enzyme in some Gram negative bacterial isolated from burn patients in Sulaimani City, Iraq. Eur Sci J. 2014;10:1857–1881. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murugan N.A., Malathi J., Therese K.L., Madhavan H.N. Antimicrobial susceptibility and prevalence of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and its co-existence among Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered from ocular infections. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7:147e51. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Akya A., Salimi A., Nomanpour B., Ahmadi K. Prevalence and clonal dissemination of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Kermanshah. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8 doi: 10.5812/jjm.20980v2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saderi H., Owlia P. Detection of multidrug resistant (MDR) and extremely drug resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10:265–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hammami S., Gautier V., Ghozzi R., Da Costa A., Ben-Redjeb S., Arlet G. Diversity in VIM-2–encoding class 1 integrons and occasional blaSHV2a carriage in isolates of a persistent, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clone from Tunis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:179–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abiri R., Mohammadi P., Shavani N., Rezaei M. Detection and genetic characterization of metallo-β-lactamase IMP-1 and VIM-2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from different hospitals in Kermanshah, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8 doi: 10.5812/jjm.22582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hong D.J., Bae I.K., Jang I.H., Jeong S.H., Kang H.K., Lee K. Epidemiology and characteristics of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Chemother. 2015;47:81–97. doi: 10.3947/ic.2015.47.2.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bassetti M., Vena A., Croxatto A., Righi E., Guery B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context. 2018;7:212527. doi: 10.7573/dic.212527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shivaprasad A., Antony B., Shenoy P. Comparative evaluation of four phenotypic tests for detection of metallo-β-lactamase and carbapenemase production in Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:DC05–DC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6447.4317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meletis G., Exindari M., Vavatsi N., Sofianou D., Diza E. Mechanisms responsible for the emergence of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hippokratia. 2012;16:303–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Viedma E., Juan C., Villa J. VIM-2-producing multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST175 clone, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1235–1241. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.111234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Khorvash F., Yazdani M., Shabani S., Soudi A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo β-lactamases (VIM, IMP, SME, and AIM) in the clinical isolates of intensive care units, a university hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res. 2017;6:147. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.219412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Azimi A., Peymani A., Kianoush pour P. Phenotypic and molecular detection of metallo-β-lactamase–producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with burns in Tehran, Iran. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018;51:610–615. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0174-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salimi F., Eftekhar F. Prevalence of blaIMP, and blaVIM gene carriage in metallo-β-lactamase–producing burn isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Tehran. Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44:511–514. doi: 10.3906/sag-1302-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saffari M., Firoozeh F., Pourbabaee M., Zibaei M. Evaluation of metallo-β-lactamase–production and carriage of blaVIM genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wound infections in Isfahan. Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5 doi: 10.5812/atr.34343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Radan M., Moniri R., Khorshidi A., Gilasi H., Norouzi Z., Beigi F., Dasteh Goli Y. Emerging carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates carrying blaIMP among burn patients in Isfahan, Iran. Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5 doi: 10.5812/atr.33664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Azimi A.
  • 31.Pitout J.D.D., Gregson D.B., Poirel L., McClure J., Le P., Church D.L. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamases in a large centralized laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3129–3135. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3129-3135.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Azeez B., Bakr K. Phenotypic and molecular detection of metallo-β-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from different clinical infections in Erbil. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci. 2019;31:46–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hussein Z.K., Shamkhi I.J. Detection of blaVIM1 gene in carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from clinical samples in Wasit province hospitals. Basrah J Vet Res. 2018;17:30–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Crespo M.P., Woodford N., Sinclair A., Kaufmann M.E., Turton J., Glover J. Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing VIM-8, a novel–metallo-β-lactamase, in a tertiary care center in Cali, Colombia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5094–5101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5094-5101.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nordmann P., Poirel L. Emerging carbapenemases in Gram negative aerobes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:321–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from New Microbes and New Infections are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES