Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Clin. 2020 Jan 31;36(2):189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.11.001

Cell-Cell Communication Breakdown and Endothelial Dysfunction

Daniel D Lee 1, Margaret A Schwarz 2,*
PMCID: PMC7078071  NIHMSID: NIHMS1554673  PMID: 32172808

I. Introduction

Winding and twisting over 100,000 miles, a vascular network composed of over one trillion stitched together endothelial cells (EC) represents the functionally largest organ system within the human body. Operating as a dynamic semi-selective barrier, endothelial-lined vessels are geared for different roles with smooth muscle bound arteries delivering pulsatile oxygen rich blood, capillaries serving as distribution sites for nutrients and oxygen before up taking waste, and the venous system, managed by a series of valves, facilitating vascular return of oxygen poor blood. Within this maze, endothelial cells are geared for organ specific functions and cell-cell communication with continuous endothelial boundaries found in skeletal muscle, heart, lung and brain tissue, fenestrations between endothelial cells in endocrine glands, the gastrointestinal mucosal and renal glomeruli, and discontinuous endothelium in the liver and spleen1. As such, this diverse and heterogeneous organ system serves as a delivery system and first line of defense in disease processes.

Orchestrated from migrating primitive embryonic splanchnic mesoderm2, angioblast derived blood islands guided by growth factor gradients such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PGF), merge together forming vasculogenic lumens while sprouting angioblast activated by VEGF, guides sensitive tip-cells to extend from endothelial stalk cells to form angiogenic extensions3. Coalesce of these branching networks, pruned by remodeling, are directed by distinctive environmental cues creating a tissue-specific vascular bed designed to meet the diverse needs of each organ. A fundamental requirement for endothelium in normal organ development and maturation46 suggests that distinct environmental cues within the developing tissues guide endothelial cell function. Indeed, recent studies using unbiased transcriptional profiling through single cell analysis of EC from different organs identified distinct organ-specific endothelial genetic profiles that not only define EC heterogeneity, but also suggests that epigenetic footprints control basal expression of EC specific genes711. Guided by metabolic needs of the tissue12, endothelial cells are the vascular building blocks essential for embryogenesis, organ development, and tissue regeneration. Disruption in the foundation of the endothelial network contributes to the evolution of pathologic disease processes such as hypo-perfusion, sepsis, vasculopathies associated with diabetes and atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction.

II. Characteristics of the normal endothelium

Tissue homeostasis of the human body requires an adequate flow of blood for not only immune cell surveillance and nutrients but also oxygen delivery. To meet the demands, an elaborate vasculature lined by endothelium develop through the following nuanced processes: (1) vasculogenesis; (2) angiogenesis; (3) arteriogenesis; (4) and the lesser-known lymphoangiogenesis. Beginning from vasculogenesis, the angioblast-derived blood islands are specified through precisely timed and spatially coordinated networks of signaling pathways not only between themselves but also among other types of cells, which is collectively referred to as cell-cell communication.

The first two of the four processes are typically described in normal physiology while altered mechanisms can occur in pathology due to endothelial dysfunction. Vasculogenesis is a two-step sequential process of blood vasculature that grow anew from the primitive embryonic splanchnic mesoderm: first, fate determination of the endothelium and differentiation of endothelial progenitor cells that range from hemangioblast to the differentiated endothelial cell; second, the organization that occurs into primitive angioblast-derived blood islands13,14. Fate determination is largely genetically determined by transcription factors (e.g., ETS transcription factor variant 2, ETV2; ER71) that it responds to factors secreted from neighboring endoderm such as fibroblast growth factors (e.g. FGF2) and bone morphogenic proteins (e.g. BMP4). As fate is assigned, VEGF signaling regulates endothelial organization into blood islands and tubular formation, a process that has been documented to be both genetically pre-patterned and self-organizing15. Angiogenesis is the remodeling and emerging of vessels from the existing vasculature, which can be further sub-divided into two types: sprouting and non-sprouting16,17. Sprouting refers to the migration, proliferation, and three-dimensional organization of endothelial cells into tubes while non-sprouting is the division and re-modeling of existing vessels by transluminal invagination. Following tubular formation and cardiovascular development, the resulting blood flow creates vectors of physical force that can activate other forms of vascular growth18,19.

The latter two of the four processes, arteriogenesis and lymphoangiogenesis, are frequently described as compensatory in context of pathology that limit oxygen delivery including, but not limited to, tissue damage and ischemia. As an adaptive response to ischemia, arteriogenesis, also known as collateral artery growth, is the proliferation and formation of collateral arteries from pre-existing arterial connections16. Lymphoangioigenesis is the growth of lymphatic vessels from existing ones20.

With such a vast network of vessels that cover the human body, the endothelium is influenced by location-specific physiological mechanisms, referred to as endothelial cell (EC) heterogeneity. The location thereby dictates their genetic and phenotypic characteristics along with cell-cell communication. Originally discovered by electron microscopy, EC heterogeneity was defined by structural characteristics like the presence of plasmalemmal vesicles which are now called caveolae21. Since then, experimental techniques (e.g. confocal microscopy), have defined the classical markers of the endothelial lineage as follows: hemangioblast (CD133+/VEGFR2+); neonatal angioblast (CD34+/VEGFR2+/VE-Cadherin); adult endothelial progenitor cell (CD34/VEGFR2+VE-Cadherin+); matured endothelium (CD34+/CD31+/VEGFR2+/VE-Cadherin+). Technological advances in RNA sequencing at the single cellular level have made it possible to further describe endothelial populations based on antigen composition along with the respective gene expression. Studies utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing further support EC heterogeneity as being organ-specific8,11,22. For example, the endothelium in the heart and lung express higher levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) than do the kidney and liver11. More specifically within the heart, vWF expression is higher in arterioles than capillaries or venules while it is a mosaic pattern within the aorta of the adult heart22. These studies support endothelial cell heterogeneity and an organ-specific identity.

The endothelium is not an inert tube-like delivery system functioning in isolation, but rather a metabolically active regulator of adequate blood flow. In constant communication with circulating factors the endothelium can respond dynamically to its (micro) environment, further highlighting the importance of EC location and heterogeneity. Exposed to such a wide range of signals, the collective heterogeneous endothelium selectively process and respond (signal) while minimizing spontaneous activity (noise) thus modulating cell-cell communication with other cells such as pericytes or leukocyte23. Emerging evidence supports a dynamic metabolic shift within the endothelium during vessel formation – an important distinction from the dogma that genetic signaling cascades determined these processes. With relatively low mitochondrial counts24, tip cells of sprouting endothelium in vitro rely on changes to glycolytic flux while stalk cells relies on changes to fatty acid oxidation. Therefore, emerging evidence supports the importance of ensuring the availability of essential metabolic components to maintain endothelial cell well-being and vessel stability.

III. Functions of the Endothelium

Governed by mechanical and humoral forces, endothelial cells function as the gatekeeper of fluid, circulating cells and solutes. Functionally, physiologic solutes and fluid transporting is reliant on two mechanisms, the paracellular process based on cell-cell junctions and transcellular vesicle-based pathways25,26. Acting as the dominant avenue, paracellular transport is mediated by the cooperation between two junction types, tight junctions and adherens junctions. Tight junctions (TJ), also known as zonulae occludens, are composed of a series of proteins including claudins, occludins, JAMs (junctional adhesion molecules) and ESAM (endothelial cell-selective adhesion molecule) and are responsible for the structural actin cytoskeletal foundation of the EC cell. Varying in amount and organization based on vascular region, a higher concentration of TJs are required for the blood brain barrier, large arteries and vessels with continuous networks while fewer TJ present are found where EC facilitate transport such as capillaries and venules. Although the TJ are known to be preferential sites for basal transport, they are also susceptible to plasma protein and leukocyte extravasation.

Working in conjunction with TJ, adherens junctions (AJ) are protein complexes linked together by a cytoplasmic actin cytoskeleton that connects the cytoskeleton of one EC to the adjacent EC through an endothelial specific adhesion protein called vascular endothelial (VE) cadherin. Stabilization of the Ca2+ dependent extracellular domain of VE cadherin through its binding to the catenin family proteins, results in its maintenance at the juxtamembrane domain providing membrane competence and preventing its destabilizing internalization. Together, TJ and AJ provide EC stability by regulating junctional tension through carefully organized crosstalk between these two interdependent and mechanisms. However, when disruption of this organized cell-cell interface through either disconnection of the junction complexes or through clustering of the junctional complexes forming focal junctional connections occurs, it can create voids between the cells that contribute to vessel permeability.

Transcellular transport is dependent on vesicle-based mechanisms where macromolecules and fluid navigate across the EC through endocytosis, fusion and vesiculo-vacuolar transport. For example, endocytosis of proteins such as albumin via its receptor clusters requires direct interaction with caveolin-1, resulting in caveolae-mediated albumin transport while fusion of albumin-containing vesicles to the basal membrane utilizes SNARE proteins. Vesiculo-vacuolar organelles, predominately found in the capillary venules of tumors, form a transendothelial highway from plasma extravasation through interconnecting vesicles and vacuoles that span the luminal to abluminal surface. An alternative mechanism of transport is the paracellular transportation at the cell-cell junctions called transcellular diapedesis. This method allows for the extravasation of leukocytes and tumor cells at sites of endothelial cell adhesion molecules including intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), CD99, or junctional adhesion molecule (JAM)-A. These finely regulated mechanisms are vital in the maintenance of vascular integrity and when inflammation or injury occurs, yield to movement of vessel contents into surrounding tissue.

Vascular injury to the endothelial cell barrier triggers a cascading chain reaction through a combination of inflammatory and wound healing processes in an attempt to regain hemostasis that in part is regulated by the disrupted endothelium27. Within intact vessels quiescent EC hold transmembrane tissue factor (TF), a major initiator of hemostatic clot formation, inactive. Following EC disturbance, the extrinsic coagulation cascade is initiated through TF activation of factor (F) VII significantly augmenting the proteolytic activity of FVIIa that contributes to conversion of FX to FXa. FXa promotes transformation of prothrombin to thrombin whose function as a protease activates fibrinogen to the protein polymer fibrin. Once initiated, an amplification of the process ensues with circulating platelet aggregation while the propagation phase results in the production of large amounts of insoluble fibrin that when crosslinked forms an organized clot or thrombus, sealing the site of injury2730. While vital in the repair process, TF also contributes to pathogenic processes such as atherosclerotic plaques and thromboembolisms. Once a wound is repaired, EC regulate vessel recanalization through release of pro-fibrinolytic molecules such as tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and platelet cleaving metalloproteases resulting in clot degradation.

Beyond barrier and integrity, the endothelium is positioned as a pivotal regulator of vascular contractile forces. Through the release of vasodilator substances, EC modulate the state of adjacent smooth muscle by way of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) also known as nitric oxide (NO). Regulated by circulating neurohumoral mediators such as histamine, acetylcholine, bradykinin, thrombin and growth factors, endothelial L-arginine is enzymatically converted by nitric oxide synthase to produce NO. Counteracting the relaxing effects of NO, “physiologic stimuli such as physical forces, circulating hormones (catecholamines, melanocortin, vasopressin) platelet derived substances (serotonin, adenosine diphosphate), and autacoids (histamine, bradykinin, prostacyclin, prostaglandin E4) share with acetylcholine31” the ability to mediate endothelial release of vasoconstrictor substances called endothelium-derived contracting factors resulting in perivascular smooth muscle cell contraction. While NO release can be chronically upregulated through exercise, dietary factors and estrogen, similarly it can be downregulated in response to oxidative stress, vascular diseases such as diabetes and hypertension, and aging. As a result of endothelial-dependent dysregulation of vascular contractile forces, it contributes to progression of disease processes associated with aged individuals and patients with hypertension and diabetes31.

IV. Endothelial development and cell-cell communication

The clinical importance of signaling networks that coordinate the heterogenous endothelium regulation of cardiovascular activity, and its dependence on endothelial cell-cell communication is enormous. With such a key role as an effector, the endothelium must detect and process the numerous local and circulating cues presented from an average of six neighboring cells32. Exposed to such a wide range of signals, the collective of EC heterogeneity selectively process and respond (signal) while minimizing spontaneous activity (noise). Thereby modulating input with a coordinated signaling output with other neighboring cells is fundamental to maintain vessel homeostasis.

The endothelium heterogeneity of a vascular bed acquires specialization by adapting to environment-specific variance in shear stress and cues. Early experimental approaches, particularly in isolation such as organ baths or vessel isolation studies, had supported the notion that the endothelium was relatively homogenous in its function. In order for specialization to occur, it dictates that there is an expression of specific receptors that sense transdifferential cues. For example, postcapillary venules highly express surface protein markers for classical leukocyte adhesion such as E-cadherin, P-selectin, VCAM1, whereas it does not express the endothelial protein C receptor that is found on large vessels.

Extracellular cues are sensed through their respective receptors, which are then transmitted as broadly defined to be either functional or proliferative-migratory signals. The breadth of signals for cell-cell communication is extensive yet growing. In addition to classical growth factors such as VEGF and PDGF isoforms, lipids such as sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) or ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) metabolites secreted such as succinate and exosomes have been found to dictate signaling in the endothelium3239.

The cell-cell communication that exists between endothelium and neighboring cells are transmitted through the following ways: endocrine, neurotransmitter, paracrine, and autocrine. Historically, Bayliss and Starling who showed a substance secreted into the bloodstream from the jejunum evoked a response in the pancreas first illustrated endocrine signaling in 1902. Neurotransmitter signaling was then described where an extracellular cue was directly exerted by the nervous system onto effector tissue. Methods to initiate transmission of local signaling occur through paracrine signaling to neighboring cells or self-activating autocrine signaling. Many cues such as the ligands VEGF, PDGF, S1P, C1P are distributed in a concentration gradient that are recognized by their respective receptors and signal through multiple transmission methods in a context-dependent manner. For example, gradients of autocrine VEGF isoforms are essential for vascular homeostasis while paracrine VEGF isoforms guide tip formation4042.

Ligands bind to receptors that are generally classified into the following 3 types: G protein-coupled, ion channel-linked, or enzyme-linked. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are named for the heterotrimeric guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins that mediate their cellular actions; they contain seven membrane-spanning alpha helices and a cytosolic C-terminal tail that is involved in receptor de-sensitization. Ligands binding to ion channel-linked receptors cause an open conformation to a channel that allows specific ions to pass through. Finally, enzyme-linked receptors bound to their respective ligand activate an intracellular enzyme, typically a kinase including, but not limited to, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and receptor guanylyl cyclases. The time-dependent consequences of the ligand-receptor binding can be grouped as follows: (1) short-term, functional; (2) long-term, proliferative signaling. The same ligand-receptor binding can result in more than one output and are thereby context-dependent. Take S1P binding to one of its five GPCRs, S1PR1–5, as an example. S1P levels in plasma range from 0.1 – 1 μM43,44. Mid-range levels of S1P secreted by the endothelium can bind to S1PR1 on leukocytes to mediate their short-term homing34. However, increased amounts over time are needed for vascular maintenance by inducing proliferation33. In the following section, examples of various important cell-cell communications are described.

A. Mural cell (i.e., pericyte, vascular smooth muscle cells)-endothelium

Critical to vascular foundation, mural cells are essential for development and homeostasis of blood vessels. Alterations or disruption in mural cells contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Comprised of pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMC), similar to EC heterogeneity, the heterogeneity of mural cells is found through various vascular beds and tissue, differing by morphology and antigen expression. Whereas pericytes associate with blood vessels of smaller diameter, vSMCs associate with those of larger diameter vessels to directly control vasodilation and vasoconstriction. The ratio of pericyte to endothelium can range between 1:1, found in neural tissue, to 1:10, found in skeletal muscle45.

During angiogenesis, sprouting endothelium secrete PDGF-B to chemoattract pericytes that express the respective receptor PDGFR-β, stimulate proliferation of vSMCs, and initiate maturation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells. Conversely, pericytes secrete angiopoietin-1 (Ang1) that binds to Tie2 and VEGF that binds to VEGFR240 found on endothelium in a paracrine manner to promote its survival and attachment to mural cells. Recent studies describe exosomes secreted from vSMCs to endothelium increased its permeability and worsened atherosclerosis progression38.

B. Monocyte/Macrophage-endothelium

Monocytes/macrophages are an important cellular source of hallmark-secreted factors, such as VEGF-A, that are essential for blood vessel growth. During vascular growth, cell-cell communications from tissue-resident macrophages regulate interlock sprouting of angiogenic vessels through direct cell-to-cell contact46,47. The classical view of monocyte egression in an injury context will be described (Chapter 4: Platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction; Chapter 5: Role of antithrombin III and tissue factor pathway; Chapter 17: Coagulation disorders in HLH/Macrophage activation syndrome). The regulation of the sources of cytokine secretion is important to be understood. For example, in tissue repair macrophages that are matured from recruited CCR2+Ly6-c+ monocytes are essential for secreting VEGF-A, contributing to vessel growth48.

Yet controversial is the notion that macrophages are a source of circulating endothelial progenitors through transdifferentiation. On one hand, evidence supporting the transdifferentiation of macrophage-endothelium is through overlapping gene expression profiles of leukocyte subpopulations and endothelium; as certain monocyte populations express the classical endothelial marker CD3149,50. On the other hand, studies suggest that the monocyte sub-populations defined to express classical endothelial markers are rather simply a sub-population of macrophages, which are also highly plastic and known to acquire markers in its environment. Further studies are necessary to define the contribution of macrophages to vascular endothelium.

C. Endothelial to Mesenchymal (EndMT) Transition

Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EndMT) is a process where matured endothelium undergoes signaling cascades to acquire characteristics of mesenchymal cells (e.g., myofibroblasts); it is analogous to its corollary counterpart, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that has been described to a much greater and deeper extent. This phenomenon has become highlighted recently for its involvement in endothelial dysfunction and subsequent adult cardiovascular disease pathogenesis51. Whether it is causative in disease pathology remains unclear due to discrepancies and lack of standardization in experimental approaches to study EMT. Secreted transforming growth factor (TGF)-β is a potent factor for EndMT. An alteration in the signaling leads to endothelial dysfunction and contributes several pathogeneses as seen in the retina, where pericyte-derived TGF-β maintains endothelial integrity and stabilizes the structure52,53.

The functions of the endothelium through signaling processes of cell-cell communication are clearly complex yet interconnected. With the development of highly sensitive and specific techniques and assays such as single cell RNA sequencing, the identity of endothelial heterogeneity has become apparent; it also has allowed for experimental approaches to consider the cell-to-cell variability and the signaling networks there within. The heterogeneity contributes to the impaired cell-cell communication that results in endothelial dysfunction. Ultimately, the clinician’s perspective to alter blood flow to meet the metabolic demands remains a daunting task that may be improved through a deeper appreciation of the endothelial heterogeneity and targeting to improve outcomes of the disrupted signaling machineries that lead to diseases.

V. Mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction contributing to disease progression

Guardian of vascular homeostasis and tone, endothelial cells (EC) are the first line regulators of the pro-inflammatory and immune responses while in tissue repair, they govern the reparative vessel rebuilding process of neovascularization. As the body ages, cellular components including the endothelium are also declining with EC morphology and functionality tightly coupled with self-imposed risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and diabetes driving this process. Recent studies highlight the pathophysiologic changes associated with the aging endothelium. For example, endothelial cell aging or senescence plays a key role in arterial stiffing and hypertension54. As cells age, they lose their ability to replicate, are prone to apoptosis, and demonstrate reduced regenerative ability. This in part is due to irreversible cell cycle arrest where in the G1 phase, they no longer respond to cyclin-dependent kinase regulated cell growth stimuli54. Mediated in part by activity of p53, telomere dysfunction and DNA damage contribute to cell senescence while p16/retinoblastoma gene product pathways are associated more with chromatin disruptions and mitogenic stress and are associated with atherosclerotic plaques5557.

Cellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals contribute to EC oxidative stressors that are deleterious to DNA transcription and redox sensitive signaling pathways. Not limited to classic ROS alone, EC are also vulnerable to uncoupled forms of NO that gives rise to damage inducing peroxynitrites. When free radical scavengers such as glutathione synthase and superoxide synthases balance cellular ROS, premature EC senescence is avoided. Unchecked ROS expression contributes to inflammation, organ dysfunction and inhibition of NO-dependent relaxation. In conjunction with ROS, circulating inflammatory biomarkers promote EC dysfunction. From prolonged low-grade inflammation arising from sustained venous hypertension and valvular incompetence of chronic venous disease58 to life-threatening sepsis, recruitment of leukocytes perpetuates the inflammatory cascade5961. As the interface between circulating pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, TNF-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and body tissues, EC function as innocent bystanders as activated inflammatory pathways triggered by release of inflammatory cytokines promote vascular injury. Not limited to bacterial and viral etiologies, chronic inflammatory and oxidative states have also been identified in dysregulated endocrine and paracrine states such as obesity where adipocyte-derived factors and adipo-cytokines contribute to adipose tissue inflammation, reduction of NO bioavailability, insulin resistance and oxidized low-density lipoproteins62.

In conjunction with the release of cytokines, microthrombosis is induced. Stemming from exocytosis of large amounts of von Willebrand factor multimers (ULVWF) and platelet activation, they form platelet-ULVWF complexes resulting in disseminated intravascular microthrombosis, a reduction in microcirculation, and tissue hypoxia. This circular amplification process of inflammation, microthrombosis, hypoxia and oxidative stress gives rise to the “two-activation theory of the endothelium” where the endotheliopathy of sepsis promotes the activation of the two independent endothelial pathways: inflammatory and microthrombotic63,64.

While disruption of the microcirculation due to collaboration between inflammatory and microthrombotic processes is a hallmark of immune regulated sepsis, EC also secrete a gel-like substance called endothelial glycocalyx that supports healthy microvascular flow. Found on the luminal surface of vascular endothelium, glycocalyx is composed of glycosaminoglycans, glycoproteins, and glycolipids where they modulate “vascular resistance to maintain homogeneity in microcirculation, mechanotransducing fluid shear stress to endothelium, modulating vascular permeability, and buffering endothelial cells from plasma oxidants, cytokines, and circulating immune cells65.” However, during the aging process, glycocalyx deteriorates contributing to microvascular dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. When combined with dysregulation of endothelial NO and altered redox states, recruitment of proper endothelial progenitor cells and modulation of the inflammatory process begins to become unbalanced leading to endothelial dysfunction and pathologic progression of disease processes66.

In contrast to vessel maintenance, tumor growth and progression are dependent on vessel formation. Influenced by tumor metabolic needs vascular growth, extension and remodeling actively guide tumor neovascularization. Previously quiescent EC are recruited into hypoxic and necrotic regions where there is a disregard for immune surveillance and vessel growth occurs in a sea of hypoxia, inflammation and ROS. As a result of this volatile environment, tumor vasculature has increased amounts of leakage and anergy. Stabilization of the endothelium through use of anti-angiogenic therapy allows for improvement in vessel stability, perfusion, oxygen delivery, and importantly distribution of tumor targeting drugs. Therefore, normalization of the EC barrier within tumors is a critical in cancer therapy67.

VI. Conclusions and Perspectives:

Complex partners in the maintenance of vascular integrity, endothelial cells in conjunction with supporting mural cells are an essential foreman guiding the egress of circulating cells, oxygen, and nutrients to meet tissue metabolic needs. Interference in endothelial-endothelial cell-cell communication and signaling contributes to progression of pathologic disease processes. Expanding our understanding of those factors that modulate this diverse and heterogenous endothelial cell population is critical to improving our understanding of disease progression and the identification of novel therapeutic approaches.

Key points:

  • Metabolism and organ-specific signaling steer endothelial cell heterogeneity.

  • Disruption of the vascular endothelial cell lining contributes to disease progression.

  • The endothelium has an active role in local inflammatory and thrombotic response.

Synopsis:

Guided by organ-specific signals in both development and disease response, the heterogeneous endothelial cell population is a dynamic member of the vasculature. Functioning as the gatekeeper to fluid, inflammatory cells, oxygen, and nutrients, endothelial cell communication with its local environment is critical. Impairment of endothelial cell-cell communication not only disrupts this signaling process, but also contributes to pathologic disease progression. Expanding our understanding of those processes that mediate endothelial cell-cell communication is an important step in the approach to treatment of disease processes.

Funding:

(MAS) NIH R21 HD090227

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure Statement: There are no commercial or financial conflicts of interest for the authors.

References:

  • 1.Aird WC. Phenotypic heterogeneity of the endothelium: I. Structure, function, and mechanisms. Circulation research. 2007;100(2):158–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coffin JD, Harrison J, Schwartz S, Heimark R. Angioblast differentiation and morphogenesis of the vascular endothelium in the mouse embryo. Developmental biology. 1991;148(1):51–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Betz C, Lenard A, Belting HG, Affolter M. Cell behaviors and dynamics during angiogenesis. Development. 2016;143(13):2249–2260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abrahamson DR. Development of kidney glomerular endothelial cells and their role in basement membrane assembly. Organogenesis. 2009;5(1):275–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schwarz MA, Zhang F, Gebb S, Starnes V, Warburton D. Endothelial monocyte activating polypeptide II inhibits lung neovascularization and airway epithelial morphogenesis. Mechanisms of development. 2000;95(1–2):123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Villasenor A, Cleaver O. Crosstalk between the developing pancreas and its blood vessels: an evolving dialog. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2012;23(6):685–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Daniel E, Cleaver O. Vascularizing organogenesis: Lessons from developmental biology and implications for regenerative medicine. Current topics in developmental biology. 2019;132:177–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guo M, Du Y, Gokey JJ, et al. Single cell RNA analysis identifies cellular heterogeneity and adaptive responses of the lung at birth. Nature communications. 2019;10(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khan S, Taverna F, Rohlenova K, et al. EndoDB: a database of endothelial cell transcriptomics data. Nucleic acids research. 2019;47(D1):D736–D744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lukowski SW, Patel J, Andersen SB, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptional Profiling of Aortic Endothelium Identifies a Hierarchy from Endovascular Progenitors to Differentiated Cells. Cell reports. 2019;27(9):2748–2758 e2743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marcu R, Choi YJ, Xue J, et al. Human Organ-Specific Endothelial Cell Heterogeneity. iScience. 2018;4:20–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Draoui N, de Zeeuw P, Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis revisited from a metabolic perspective: role and therapeutic implications of endothelial cell metabolism. Open biology. 2017;7(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Risau W, Lemmon V. Changes in the vascular extracellular matrix during embryonic vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Developmental biology. 1988;125(2):441–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Risau W, Sariola H, Zerwes HG, et al. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in embryonic-stem-cell-derived embryoid bodies. Development. 1988;102(3):471–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Czirok A, Little CD. Pattern formation during vasculogenesis. Birth defects research Part C, Embryo today : reviews. 2012;96(2):153–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nature medicine. 2000;6(4):389–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chung AS, Ferrara N. Developmental and pathological angiogenesis. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2011;27:563–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eilken HM, Adams RH. Dynamics of endothelial cell behavior in sprouting angiogenesis. Current opinion in cell biology. 2010;22(5):617–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Song JW, Munn LL. Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(37):15342–15347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Escobedo N, Oliver G. Lymphangiogenesis: Origin, Specification, and Cell Fate Determination. Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2016;32:677–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Weibel ER, Palade GE. New Cytoplasmic Components in Arterial Endothelia. The Journal of cell biology. 1964;23:101–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yuan L, Chan GC, Beeler D, et al. A role of stochastic phenotype switching in generating mosaic endothelial cell heterogeneity. Nature communications. 2016;7:10160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eelen G, de Zeeuw P, Simons M, Carmeliet P. Endothelial cell metabolism in normal and diseased vasculature. Circulation research. 2015;116(7):1231–1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Groschner LN, Waldeck-Weiermair M, Malli R, Graier WF. Endothelial mitochondria--less respiration, more integration. Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology. 2012;464(1):63–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Radeva MY, Waschke J. Mind the gap: mechanisms regulating the endothelial barrier. Acta physiologica. 2018;222(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wettschureck N, Strilic B, Offermanns S. Passing the Vascular Barrier: Endothelial Signaling Processes Controlling Extravasation. Physiological reviews. 2019;99(3):1467–1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yau JW, Teoh H, Verma S. Endothelial cell control of thrombosis. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2015;15:130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Budnik I, Brill A. Immune Factors in Deep Vein Thrombosis Initiation. Trends in immunology. 2018;39(8):610–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoffman M. The Tissue Factor Pathway and Wound Healing. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis. 2018;44(2):142–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Witkowski M, Landmesser U, Rauch U. Tissue factor as a link between inflammation and coagulation. Trends in cardiovascular medicine. 2016;26(4):297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vanhoutte PM, Shimokawa H, Feletou M, Tang EH. Endothelial dysfunction and vascular disease - a 30th anniversary update. Acta physiologica. 2017;219(1):22–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McCarron JG, Wilson C, Heathcote HR, Zhang X, Buckley C, Lee MD. Heterogeneity and emergent behaviour in the vascular endothelium. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2019;45:23–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jung B, Obinata H, Galvani S, et al. Flow-regulated endothelial S1P receptor-1 signaling sustains vascular development. Developmental cell. 2012;23(3):600–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rosen H, Stevens RC, Hanson M, Roberts E, Oldstone MB. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors: structure, signaling, and influence. Annual review of biochemistry. 2013;82:637–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Diebold LP, Gil HJ, Gao P, Martinez CA, Weinberg SE, Chandel NS. Mitochondrial complex III is necessary for endothelial cell proliferation during angiogenesis. Nature metabolism. 2019;1(1):158–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sapieha P, Sirinyan M, Hamel D, et al. The succinate receptor GPR91 in neurons has a major role in retinal angiogenesis. Nature medicine. 2008;14(10):1067–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toma I, Kang JJ, Sipos A, et al. Succinate receptor GPR91 provides a direct link between high glucose levels and renin release in murine and rabbit kidney. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(7):2526–2534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng B, Yin WN, Suzuki T, et al. Exosome-Mediated miR-155 Transfer from Smooth Muscle Cells to Endothelial Cells Induces Endothelial Injury and Promotes Atherosclerosis. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2017;25(6):1279–1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 39.Arana L, Gangoiti P, Ouro A, Trueba M, Gomez-Munoz A. Ceramide and ceramide 1-phosphate in health and disease. Lipids in health and disease. 2010;9:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Franco M, Roswall P, Cortez E, Hanahan D, Pietras K. Pericytes promote endothelial cell survival through induction of autocrine VEGF-A signaling and Bcl-w expression. Blood. 2011;118(10):2906–2917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gerhardt H, Golding M, Fruttiger M, et al. VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. The Journal of cell biology. 2003;161(6):1163–1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee S, Chen TT, Barber CL, et al. Autocrine VEGF signaling is required for vascular homeostasis. Cell. 2007;130(4):691–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ksiazek M, Chacinska M, Chabowski A, Baranowski M. Sources, metabolism, and regulation of circulating sphingosine-1-phosphate. Journal of lipid research. 2015;56(7):1271–1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Winkler MS, Martz KB, Nierhaus A, et al. Loss of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) in septic shock is predominantly caused by decreased levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL). Journal of intensive care. 2019;7:23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Armulik A, Genove G, Betsholtz C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Developmental cell. 2011;21(2):193–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cattin AL, Burden JJ, Van Emmenis L, et al. Macrophage-Induced Blood Vessels Guide Schwann Cell-Mediated Regeneration of Peripheral Nerves. Cell. 2015;162(5):1127–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fantin A, Vieira JM, Gestri G, et al. Tissue macrophages act as cellular chaperones for vascular anastomosis downstream of VEGF-mediated endothelial tip cell induction. Blood. 2010;116(5):829–840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Willenborg S, Lucas T, van Loo G, et al. CCR2 recruits an inflammatory macrophage subpopulation critical for angiogenesis in tissue repair. Blood. 2012;120(3):613–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barnett FH, Rosenfeld M, Wood M, et al. Macrophages form functional vascular mimicry channels in vivo. Scientific reports. 2016;6:36659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim SJ, Kim JS, Papadopoulos J, et al. Circulating monocytes expressing CD31: implications for acute and chronic angiogenesis. The American journal of pathology. 2009;174(5):1972–1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kovacic JC, Dimmeler S, Harvey RP, et al. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;73(2):190–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kumarswamy R, Volkmann I, Jazbutyte V, Dangwal S, Park DH, Thum T. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition is partly mediated by microRNA-21. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2012;32(2):361–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Walshe TE, Saint-Geniez M, Maharaj AS, Sekiyama E, Maldonado AE, D’Amore PA. TGF-beta is required for vascular barrier function, endothelial survival and homeostasis of the adult microvasculature. PloS one. 2009;4(4):e5149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jia G, Aroor AR, Jia C, Sowers JR. Endothelial cell senescence in aging-related vascular dysfunction. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular basis of disease. 2019;1865(7):1802–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bhayadia R, Schmidt BM, Melk A, Homme M. Senescence-Induced Oxidative Stress Causes Endothelial Dysfunction. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(2):161–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Holdt LM, Sass K, Gabel G, Bergert H, Thiery J, Teupser D. Expression of Chr9p21 genes CDKN2B (p15(INK4b)), CDKN2A (p16(INK4a), p14(ARF)) and MTAP in human atherosclerotic plaque. Atherosclerosis. 2011;214(2):264–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sung JY, Lee KY, Kim JR, Choi HC. Interaction between mTOR pathway inhibition and autophagy induction attenuates adriamycin-induced vascular smooth muscle cell senescence through decreased expressions of p53/p21/p16. Exp Gerontol. 2018;109:51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Castro-Ferreira R, Cardoso R, Leite-Moreira A, Mansilha A. The Role of Endothelial Dysfunction and Inflammation in Chronic Venous Disease. Annals of vascular surgery. 2018;46:380–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chang JC. Sepsis and septic shock: endothelial molecular pathogenesis associated with vascular microthrombotic disease. Thrombosis journal. 2019;17:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Opal SM, van der Poll T. Endothelial barrier dysfunction in septic shock. Journal of internal medicine. 2015;277(3):277–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Khaddaj Mallat R, Mathew John C, Kendrick DJ, Braun AP. The vascular endothelium: A regulator of arterial tone and interface for the immune system. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. 2017;54(7–8):458–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Engin A. Endothelial Dysfunction in Obesity. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2017;960:345–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chang JC. TTP-like syndrome: novel concept and molecular pathogenesis of endotheliopathy-associated vascular microthrombotic disease. Thrombosis journal. 2018;16:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chang JC. Thrombogenesis and thrombotic disorders based on ‘two-path unifying theory of hemostasis’: philosophical, physiological, and phenotypical interpretation. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018;29(7):585–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Machin DR, Phuong TT, Donato AJ. The role of the endothelial glycocalyx in advanced age and cardiovascular disease. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2019;45:66–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Premer C, Kanelidis AJ, Hare JM, Schulman IH. Rethinking Endothelial Dysfunction as a Crucial Target in Fighting Heart Failure. Mayo Clinic proceedings Innovations, quality & outcomes. 2019;3(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Klein D. The Tumor Vascular Endothelium as Decision Maker in Cancer Therapy. Frontiers in oncology. 2018;8:367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES