Citizen science project reveals high diversity in Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes)

Lingwei Hou; Margarita Hernández-Restrepo; Johannes Zacharias Groenewald; Lei Cai; Pedro W Crous

doi:10.3897/mycokeys.65.47704

. 2020 Mar 10;65:49–99. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.65.47704

Citizen science project reveals high diversity in Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes)

Lingwei Hou ^1,², Margarita Hernández-Restrepo ¹, Johannes Zacharias Groenewald ³, Lei Cai ^1,^2,^✉, Pedro W Crous ^3,^4,^✉

PMCID: PMC7078340 PMID: 32206025

Abstract Abstract

Fungal communities play a crucial role in maintaining the health of managed and natural soil environments, which directly or indirectly affect the properties of plants and other soil inhabitants. As part of a Citizen Science Project initiated by the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute and the Utrecht University Museum, which aimed to describe novel fungal species from Dutch garden soil, the diversity of Didymellaceae, which is one of the largest families in the Dothideomycetes was investigated. A preliminary analysis of the ITS and LSU sequences from the obtained isolates allowed the identification of 148 strains belonging to the family. Based on a multi-locus phylogeny of a combined ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tub2 alignment, and morphological characteristics, 20 different species were identified in nine genera, namely Ascochyta, Calophoma, Didymella, Juxtiphoma, Nothophoma, Paraboeremia, Phomatodes, Stagonosporopsis, and Xenodidymella. Several isolates confirmed to be ubiquitous plant pathogens or endophytes were for the first time identified from soil, such as Ascochyta syringae, Calophoma clematidis-rectae, and Paraboeremia litseae. Furthermore, one new genus and 12 novel species were described from soil: Ascochyta benningiorumsp. nov., Didymella degraaffiaesp. nov., D. kooimaniorumsp. nov., Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorumsp. nov., Nothophoma brennandiaesp. nov., Paraboeremia rekkerisp. nov., P. truiniorumsp. nov., Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergiisp. nov., S. weymaniaesp. nov., Vandijckomycella joseaegen. nov. et sp. nov., V. snoekiaesp. nov., and Xenodidymella weymaniaesp. nov. From the results of this study, soil was revealed to be a rich substrate for members of Didymellaceae, several of which were previously known only from diseased or apparently healthy plant hosts.

Keywords: biodiversity, new taxa, Phoma , phylogeny, soil-borne fungi

Introduction

Due to high plasticity and the capacity to adapt and survive in adverse or unfavourable conditions, fungi are exceedingly successful soil inhabitants (Frąc et al. 2018). The majority of the fungal species presently known can survive in, or directly adapt to, the soil environment (Bridge and Spooner 2001; Botha 2011). Soil-borne fungi play essential roles in nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems and are able to break down all kinds of organic matter, decompose soil components or act as effective biosorbents of toxic metals, thereby helping to maintain soil health (Anderson and Domsch 1973; Bender et al. 2013; Rudgers et al. 2014; Tedersoo et al. 2014; Yang et al. 2017; Frąc et al. 2018). Soil fungal communities also form symbiotic associations with plants, thereby improving nutrient absorption (Voøíšková and Baldrian 2012). Most fungal taxa found in the soil are continuously present in the environment as harmless saprobic organisms, but some also play a negative role. For instance, plant pathogenic fungi in soil could infect seedlings or other plant tissues when conditions are suitable, resulting in significant damage (van Agtmaal et al. 2017). In addition, some fungi reside in soil in the form of propagules to survive in an unsuitable environment, posing a long-term threat to other inhabitants (Maryani et al. 2019).

Didymellaceae is a ubiquitous fungal family including saprobic, endophytic and pathogenic species (Aveskamp et al. 2008, 2010; Marin-Felix et al. 2017). More than 50% of the species in this family have been reported as plant pathogens, causing great losses to a wide range of economic crops (Aveskamp et al. 2008). Other species are found in different substrates, including soil, air, and water or cyst nematodes (Dorenbosch 1970; Chen et al. 1996; Boerema et al. 2004; Aveskamp et al. 2010; Porras-Alfaro et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2015, 2017; Grishkan 2018; Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018), and even in some extreme environments such as deep-sea sediments, or soils in Antarctica, deserts, and karst caves (Ruisi et al. 2007; Li et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016a, 2016b, 2017; Chen et al. 2017; Nagano et al. 2017; Grishkan 2018). Although recent research has suggested that the soil environment represents an important niche for the discovery of novel phoma-like species (Chen et al. 2017, van Agtmaal et al. 2017), very few studies have investigated the diversity of Didymellaceae in soil, which is a massive reservoir for plant, animal and human pathogens.

The first paper systematically investigating Didymellaceae species from soil was published by Dorenbosch (1970), who provided diagnostic characteristics and a usable identification method (keys) for nine ubiquitous phoma-like fungi from soil, including Pyrenochaeta acicola, Phoma chrysanthemicola, Ph. eupyrena, Ph. exigua, Ph. fimeti, Ph. glomerata, Ph. herbarum, Ph. medicaginis var. pinodella, and Ph. prunicola (names used at that time). Later, Boerema et al. (2004) and Domsch et al. (2007) illustrated several Didymellaceae species from soil and provided their ecological distributions. Since then, a few species have been reported sporadically, along with the research of root and seed diseases, but studies of Didymellaceae from soil are still rare, with even fewer describing new taxa from soil. Most species in previous studies have been reallocated to other genera in this family based on their DNA phylogeny (Chen et al. 2015, 2017; Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018). To date, only approximately 30 species from eight genera in Didymellaceae have been recorded from soil, namely Ascochyta, Phoma, Didymella, Neodidymelliopsis, Epicoccum, Cumuliphoma, Ectophoma and Juxtiphoma (Dorenbosch 1970; Boerema et al. 2004; Domsch et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2017; Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018). Although most of the species documented from soil are plant-associated (pathogens and endophytes), some species, such as Ph. herbarum and J. eupyrena, are characterised as soil-borne (Dorenbosch 1970; Boerema et al. 2004).

Didymellaceae species from soil always produce diverse metabolites, some of which can be cytotoxic, including cytochalasin A and B, deoxaphomin, proxiphomin and tenuazonic acid (Bennett et al. 2018). Currently, most Didymellaceae species thus far found in the soil environment were originally described from plant substrates, such as leaves, seedlings, wood, stem bases or roots, some of which are even capable of wood decay (Boerema et al. 2004; Aveskamp et al. 2008, 2010; Chen et al. 2015). On the contrary, crops that are grown in close proximity to infected soil appear to be more contaminated, given that soil is a known source of plant pathogenic fungi (Paterson and Lima 2017). Besides, some species have also been reported to be opportunistic pathogens in animals and humans, such as J. eupyrena (= Phoma eupyrena) and Phoma herbarum (Bakerspigel et al. 1981; Tullio et al. 2010). Considering the potential threat and great losses caused by soil-borne pathogens, and the application in the biotechnological or pharmaceutical industries, knowledge of the diversity of Didymellaceae in soil is urgently needed to better understand the functions, interactions and ecosystem feedback of fungi in the terrestrial environment.

The present Citizen Science Project was initiated by the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (WI) and the Utrecht University Museum, aiming to investigate the diversity of fungi in Dutch garden soil collected by children in their home gardens from different regions in the Netherlands (Groenewald et al. 2018). During the course of this project thousands of isolates were obtained from 293 soil samples. Of these, 148 isolates were found to belong to Didymellaceae, and subsequently selected for study. The aim of the present study was to investigate the diversity of Didymellaceae from Dutch garden soil, describe and illustrate novel species, and compare them with known and related species.

Materials and methods

Sampling and isolation

Protocols for the collection and processing of soil samples are described in Groenewald et al. (2018) and Giraldo et al. (2019). Isolates are maintained in the Johanna Westerdijk (JW) working collection housed at the WI in Utrecht, the Netherlands. New and interesting strains were also deposited in the CBS fungal collection and holotypes in the fungarium at the WI, respectively.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. Initially, the internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and 5.8S nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (ITS) and partial large subunit nrDNA (LSU) were amplified using primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990; Vilgalys and Sun 1994), respectively. For members of Didymellaceae two extra loci were amplified, the partial beta-tubulin (tub2) and the partial RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), using the primer pairs Tub2Fd/Tub4Rd (Woudenberg et al. 2009) and Rpb2-5F2/Rpb2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999; Sung et al. 2007), respectively. The PCR amplifications were performed following Chen et al. (2015), except for rpb2, which was amplified in a total volume of 12.5 µL containing 1.25 µL of 10× EasyTaq Buffer (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany), 0.5 µL of dNTPs (40 μM), 0.5 µL of MgCl₂ (2 mM), 0.5 µL of bovine berum albumin (BSA, 1 μg/μL), 0.5 µL of each primer (0.2 μM), 0.1 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline) and 1 µL of genomic DNA. PCR conditions for rpb2 were set as follows: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 45 s, annealing at 55 °C for 80 s and extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sequenced according to the methods of Crous et al. (2013). Consensus sequences were assembled from forward and reverse sequences using Seqman Pro v.12.1.0 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). All sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Table 1.

Taxa used in this study and their GenBank accession numbers.

Taxon name¹	Strain number²	Substrate	Country	GenBank Accession numbers³
Taxon name¹	Strain number²	Substrate	Country	rpb2	tub2	ITS	LSU
Allophoma cylindrispora	CBS 142453^T; FMR 13723	Human superficial tissue	USA	LT593058	LT592989	LN907376	LT592920
Al. nicaraguensis	CBS 506.91^T; IMI 215229; PD 91/876	Coffea sp.	Nicaragua	KT389551	GU237596	GU238058	GU237876
Al. piperis	CBS 268.93^T; PD 88/720	Peperomia pereskifolia	The Netherlands	KT389554	GU237644	GU238129	GU237816
Al. tropica	CBS 436.75^T	Saintpaulia ionantha	Germany	KT389556	GU237663	GU238149	GU237864
**Ascochyta benningiorum**	CBS 144957^T; JW 196005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824606	MN824755	MN823432	MN823581
	CBS 144958; JW 196023	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824607	MN824756	MN823433	MN823582
	JW 196013	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824608	MN824757	MN823434	MN823583
A. boeremae	CBS 372.84^T; PD 80/1246	Pisum sativum	Australia	–	KT389774	KT389697	KT389480
A. boeremae	CBS 373.84; PD 80/1247	Pisum sativum	Australia	KT389560	KT389775	KT389698	KT389481
A. fabae	CBS 649.71	Vicia faba	The Netherlands	–	GU237527	GU237964	GU237902
	CBS 524.77	Phaseolus vulgaris	Belgium	–	GU237526	GU237963	GU237880
	PD 83/492	Phaseolus vulgaris	The Netherlands	–	GU237528	GU237965	GU237917
A. herbicola	CBS 629.97^R; PD 76/1017	Water	USA	KP330421	GU237614	GU238083	GU237898
A. lentis	CBS 370.84; PD 81/783	Lens culinaris	Unknown	–	KT389768	KT389691	KT389474
A. medicaginicola var. macrospora	CBS 112.53^T	Medicago sativa	USA	–	GU237628	GU238101	GU237749
A. medicaginicola var. macrospora	CBS 404.65^R; IMI 116999	Medicago sativa	Canada	KP330423	GU237629	GU238102	GU237859
A. nigripycnidia	CBS 116.96^T; PD 95/7930	Vicia cracca	Russia	–	GU237637	GU238118	GU237756
A. phacae	CBS 184.55^T	Phaca alpina	Switzerland	–	KT389769	KT389692	KT389475
A. pisi	CBS 126.54	Pisum sativum	The Netherlands	DQ677967	GU237531	EU754137	GU237772
	CBS 122785^T; PD 78/517	Pisum sativum	The Netherlands	–	GU237532	GU237969	GU237763
	CBS 122751; ATCC 201620	Pisum sativum	Canada	EU874867	KP330388	KP330444	KP330432
A. rabiei	CBS 534.65	Cicer arietinum	India	KP330405	GU237533	GU237970	GU237886
A. rabiei	CBS 237.37^T	Cicer arietinum	Bulgaria	–	KT389773	KT389696	KT389479
A. syringae	CBS 545.72	Syringa vulgaris	The Netherlands	–	KT389777	KT389700	KT389483
A. syringae	JW 1074	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824605	MN824754	MN823431	MN823580
A. versabilis	CBS 876.97^R	Silene sp.	The Netherlands	KT389561	GU237664	GU238152	GU237909
A. viciae	CBS 451.68	Vicia sepium	The Netherlands	KT389562	KT389778	KT389701	KT389484
A. viciae-pannonicae	CBS 254.92	Vicia pannonica	Czech Republic	–	KT389779	KT389702	KT389485
Boeremia exigua var. heteromorpha	CBS 443.94^T	Nerium oleander	Italy	KT389573	GU237497	GU237935	GU237866
B. exigua var. populi	CBS 100167^T; PD 93/217	Populus (×)euramericana	The Netherlands	–	GU237501	GU237939	GU237707
Briansuttonomyces eucalypti	CBS 114879^T	Eucalyptus sp.	South Africa	–	KU728595	KU728519	KU728479
Briansuttonomyces eucalypti	CBS 114887	Eucalyptus sp.	South Africa	–	KU728596	KU728520	KU728480
Calophoma clematidina	CBS 102.66	Clematis sp.	UK	KT389587	FJ427099	FJ515630	FJ426988
Calophoma clematidina	CBS 108.79^T; PD 78/522	Clematis sp.	The Netherlands	KT389588	FJ427100	FJ515632	FJ426989
C. clematidis-rectae	JW 179007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824612	MN824761	MN823438	MN823587
C. clematidis-rectae	CBS 507.63	Clematis sp.	The Netherlands	KT389589	FJ515624	FJ515647	FJ515606
C. vodakii	CBS 173.53^T	Hepatica triloba	Switzerland	–	KT389791	KT389714	KT389497
Coniothyrium palmarum	CBS 400.71	Chamaerops humilis	Italy	KT389592	KT389792	EU754153	AY720708
Cumuliphoma indica	CBS 654.77^T; FMR 15341	Unknown	India	LT623261	FJ427153	GU238122	FJ427043
Cu. omnivirens	CBS 341.86^T; FMR 14915	Phaseolus vulgaris	Belgium	LT62326	FJ427152	LT623214	FJ427042
Cu. pneumoniae	CBS 142454^T; FMR13739	Human respiratory tract	USA	LT593063	LT592994	LN907392	LT592925
Didymella aeria	CGMCC 3.18353^T; LC 7441	Air	China	KY742137	KY742293	KY742205	KY742051
D. aliena	LC 8121	Pyrus calleryana	Italy	–	KY742295	KY742207	KY742053
D. aliena	CBS 379.93; PD 82/945	Berberis sp.	The Netherlands	KP330416	GU237578	GU238037	GU237851
D. americana	CBS 185.85^R; PD 80/1191	Zea mays	USA	KT389594	FJ427088	GU237990	FJ426972
D. anserina	CBS 360.84^R	Potato flour	The Netherlands	KT389596	GU237551	GU237993	GU237839
D. aquatica	CGMCC 3.18349^T; LC 5556	Water	China	KY742140	KY742297	KY742209	KY742055
D. arachidicola	CBS 333.75^T; ATCC 28333; IMI 386092	Arachis hypogaea	South Africa	KT389598	GU237554	GU237996	GU237833
D. aurea	CBS 269.93^T; PD 78/1087	Medicago polymorpha	New Zealand	KT389599	GU237557	GU237999	GU237818
D. bellidis	CBS 714.85^R; PD 74/265	Bellis perennis	The Netherlands	KP330417	GU237586	GU238046	GU237904
D. boeremae	CBS 109942^T; PD 84/402	Medicago littoralis cv. harbi	Australia	KT389600	FJ427097	GU238048	FJ426982
D. brunneospora	CBS 115.58^T; FMR 15745	Chrysanthemum roseum	Germany	KT389625	KT389802	KT389723	KT389505
D. calidophila	CBS 448.83^T	Desert soil	Egypt	–	FJ427168	GU238052	FJ427059
D. chenopodii	CBS 128.93^R; PD 79/140	Chenopodium quinoa cv. sajana	Peru	KT389602	GU237591	GU238055	GU237775
D. chloroguttulata	CGMCC 3.18351^T; LC 7435	Air	China	KY742142	KY742299	KY742211	KY742057
D. coffeae-arabicae	CBS 123380^T; PD 84/1013	Coffea arabica	Ethiopia	KT389603	FJ427104	GU238005	FJ426993
D. dactylidis	CBS 124513^T; PD 73/1414	Dactylis glomerata	USA	–	GU237599	GU238061	GU237766
D. degraaffiae	CBS 144956^T; JW 195004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824470	MN824618	MN823295	MN823444
D. dimorpha	CBS 346.82^T	Opuntia phyllocladium	Spain	–	GU237606	GU238068	GU237835
D. ellipsoidea	CGMCC 3.18350^T; LC 7434	Air	China	KY742145	KY742302	KY742214	KY742060
D. eucalyptica	CBS 377.91^R; PD 79/210	Eucalyptus sp.	Australia	KT389605	GU237562	GU238007	GU237846
D. exigua	CBS 183.55^T	Rumex arifolius	France	EU874850	GU237525	EU754155	GU237794
D. gardeniae	CBS 626.68^T; IMI 108771	Gardenia jasminoides	India	KT389606	FJ427114	GQ387595	FJ427003
D. glomerata	CBS 528.66^R; PD 63/590	Chrysanthemum sp.	The Netherlands	GU371781	FJ427124	EU754184	FJ427013
D. heteroderae	CBS 109.92^T; PD 73/1405	Undefined food material	The Netherlands	KT389601	FJ427098	GU238002	FJ426983
D. ilicicola	CGMCC 3.18355^T; LC 8126	Ilex chinensis	Italy	KY742150	KY742307	KY742219	KY742065
D. infuscatispora	CGMCC 3.18356^T; LC 8128	Chrysanthemum indicum	China	KY742152	KY742309	KY742221	KY742067
D. keratinophila	CBS 143032^T; FMR 13690	Human superficial tissue	USA	LT593039	LT592970	LN907343	LT592901
D. kooimaniorum	CBS 144951^T; JW 27006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824474	MN824622	MN823299	MN823448
D. lethalis	CBS 103.25	Unknown	Unknown	KT389607	GU237564	GU238010	GU237729
D. macrophylla	CGMCC 3.18357^T; LC 8131	Hydrangea macrophylla	Italy	KY742154	KY742312	KY742224	KY742070
D. macrostoma	JW 57015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824472	MN824620	MN823297	MN823446
	CBS 223.69^R	Acer pseudoplatanus	Switzerland	KT389608	GU237623	GU238096	GU237801
	JW 149014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824473	MN824621	MN823298	MN823447
	CBS 482.95	Larix decidua	Germany	KT389609	GU237626	GU238099	GU237869
D. maydis	CBS 588.69^T	Zea mays	USA	GU371782	FJ427190	EU754192	FJ427086
D. microchlamydospora	CBS 105.95^T	Eucalyptus sp.	UK	KP330424	FJ427138	GU238104	FJ427028
D. molleriana	CBS 229.79^R	Digitalis purpurea	New Zealand	KP330418	GU237605	GU238067	GU237802
D. negriana	CBS 358.71^R	Vitis vinifera	Germany	KT389610	GU237635	GU238116	GU237838
D. nigricans	CBS 444.81^T; PDDCC 6546	Actinidia chinensis	New Zealand	–	GU237558	GU238000	GU237867
D. nigricans	PD 77/919	Actinidea chinensis	Unknown	–	GU237559	GU238001	GU237915
D. ocimicola	CGMCC 3.18358^T; LC 8137	Ocimum sp.	China	–	KY742320	KY742232	KY742078
D. pedeiae	CBS 124517^T; PD 92/612A	Schefflera elegantissima	The Netherlands	KT389612	GU237642	GU238127	GU237770
D. pinodella	LC 8139	Acer palmatum	Japan	KY742161	KY742322	KY742234	KY742080
D. pinodella	CBS 531.66	Trifolium pratense	USA	KT389613	FJ427162	GU238017	FJ427052
D. pinodes	CBS 525.77^T	Pisum sativum	Belgium	KT389614	GU237572	GU238023	GU237883
D. pomorum	JW 196022	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824469	MN824617	MN823294	MN823443
D. pomorum	CBS 539.66^R; IMI 122266; PD 64/914	Polygonum tataricum	The Netherlands	KT389618	FJ427166	GU238028	FJ427056
D. protuberans	CBS 381.96^T; PD 71/706	Lycium halifolium	The Netherlands	KT389620	GU237574	GU238029	GU237853
D. pteridis	CBS 379.96^T	Pteris sp.	The Netherlands	KT389624	KT389801	KT389722	KT389504
D. rhei	CBS 109177^R; PD 2000/9941	Rheum rhaponticum	New Zealand	KP330428	GU237653	GU238139	GU237743
D. rumicicola	CBS 683.79^T	Rumex obtusifolius	New Zealand	KT389622	KT389800	KT389721	KT389503
	CBS 179.97	Rumex hydrolapathum	The Netherlands	KP330415	GU237575	GU238034	GU237793
	CBS 539.77	Rumex obtusifolius	New Zealand	MN824471	MN824619	MN823296	MN823445
D. sancta	CBS 281.83^T	Ailanthus altissima	South Africa	KT389623	FJ427170	GU238030	FJ427063
D. segeticola	CGMCC 3.17489^T; LC 1636	Cirsium segetum	China	KP330414	KP330399	KP330455	KP330443
D. senecionicola	CBS 160.78^R	Senecio jacobaea	New Zealand	–	GU237657	GU238143	GU237787
D. subglomerata	CBS 110.92^R; PD 76/1010	Triticum sp.	USA	KT389626	FJ427186	GU238032	FJ427080
D. subherbarum	CBS 250.92^T; PD 92/371	Zea mays	Canada	–	GU237659	GU238145	GU237809
D. suiyangensis	CGMCC 3.18352^T; LC 7439	Air	China	KY742169	KY742332	KY742244	KY742090
D. viburnicola	CBS 523.73^R; PD 69/800	Viburnum cassioides	The Netherlands	KP330430	GU237667	GU238155	GU237879
Ectophoma multirostrata	CBS 274.60^T; FMR 15335; IMI 081598	Soil	India	LT623265	FJ427141	GU238111	FJ427031
Ec. pomi	CBS 267.92^T; FMR 15346; PD 76/1014	Coffea arabica	India	LT623263	GU237643	GU238128	GU237814
Epicoccum nigrum	CBS 173.73^T; IMI 164070	Dactylis glomerata	USA	KT389632	FJ427107	GU237975	FJ426996
	LC 8157	Ocimum sp.	China	KY742179	KY742352	KY742264	KY742110
	LC 5180	Lonicera japonica	China	KY742178	KY742351	KY742263	KY742109
	LC 8158	Poa annua	USA	KY742180	KY742353	KY742265	KY742111
Ep. pimprinum	CBS 246.60^T; IMI 081601	Soil	India	–	FJ427159	GU237976	FJ427049
Ep. pimprinum	PD 77/1028	Unknown	Unknown	KT389633	FJ427160	GU237977	FJ427050
Heterophoma sylvatica	CBS 874.97^T; PD 93/764	Melampyrum pratense	The Netherlands	–	GU237662	GU238148	GU237907
H. verbascicola	CGMCC 3.18364^T; LC 8163	Verbascum thapsus	China	KY742187	KY742361	KY742273	KY742119
Juxtiphoma eupyrena	JW 164001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824541	MN824689	MN823366	MN823515
	JW 263011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824542	MN824690	MN823367	MN823516
	JW 158007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824543	MN824691	MN823368	MN823517
	JW 201014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824544	MN824692	MN823369	MN823518
	JW 213001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824545	MN824693	MN823370	MN823519
	JW 201009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824546	MN824694	MN823371	MN823520
	JW 4005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824547	MN824695	MN823372	MN823521
	JW 4017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824548	MN824696	MN823373	MN823522
	JW 3015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824549	MN824697	MN823374	MN823523
	JW 224006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824550	MN824698	MN823375	MN823524
	JW 132015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824551	MN824699	MN823376	MN823525
Juxtiphoma eupyrena	JW 146002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	–	MN824700	MN823377	MN823526
	JW 160021	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824552	MN824701	MN823378	MN823527
	JW 18016	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824553	MN824702	MN823379	MN823528
	JW 40009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824554	MN824703	MN823380	MN823529
	JW 40019	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824555	MN824704	MN823381	MN823530
	JW 97009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824556	MN824705	MN823382	MN823531
	JW 96020	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824557	MN824706	MN823383	MN823532
	JW 57007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824558	MN824707	MN823384	MN823533
	JW 149010	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824559	MN824708	MN823385	MN823534
	JW 74008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824560	MN824709	MN823386	MN823535
	JW 247003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824561	MN824710	MN823387	MN823536
	JW 267005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824562	MN824711	MN823388	MN823537
	JW 261008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824563	MN824712	MN823389	MN823538
	JW 30012	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824564	MN824713	MN823390	MN823539
	JW 167015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824565	MN824714	MN823391	MN823540
	JW 221022B	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824566	MN824715	MN823392	MN823541
	JW 259004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824567	MN824716	MN823393	MN823542
	JW 73004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824568	MN824717	MN823394	MN823543
	JW 170018	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824569	MN824718	MN823395	MN823544
	JW 141018	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824570	MN824719	MN823396	MN823545
	JW 181003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824571	MN824720	MN823397	MN823546
	JW 289013	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824572	MN824721	MN823398	MN823547
	JW 127004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824573	MN824722	MN823399	MN823548
	JW 81007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824574	MN824723	MN823400	MN823549
	JW 182002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824575	MN824724	MN823401	MN823550
	JW 212001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824576	MN824725	MN823402	MN823551
	JW 191036	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824577	MN824726	MN823403	MN823552
	JW 221020	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824578	MN824727	MN823404	MN823553
	JW 96002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824579	MN824728	MN823405	MN823554
	JW 52011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824580	MN824729	MN823406	MN823555
	JW 38012	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824581	MN824730	MN823407	MN823556
	JW 40007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824582	MN824731	MN823408	MN823557
	JW 43007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824583	MN824732	MN823409	MN823558
Juxtiphoma eupyrena	JW 75002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824584	MN824733	MN823410	MN823559
	JW 116017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824585	MN824734	MN823411	MN823560
	JW 170013	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824586	MN824735	MN823412	MN823561
	JW 79016	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824587	MN824736	MN823413	MN823562
	CBS 374.91; FMR 15329	Solanum tuberosum	The Netherlands	LT623268	FJ427110	GU238072	FJ426999
	JW 125024	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824588	MN824737	MN823414	MN823563
	JW 158014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824589	MN824738	MN823415	MN823564
	JW 4010	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824590	MN824739	MN823416	MN823565
	JW 202020	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824591	MN824740	MN823417	MN823566
J. kolkmaniorum	JW 125028	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824592	MN824741	MN823418	MN823567
	CBS 146005^T; JW 185006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824593	MN824742	MN823419	MN823568
	JW 191004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824594	MN824743	MN823420	MN823569
	JW 23021	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824595	MN824744	MN823421	MN823570
	JW 167004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824596	MN824745	MN823422	MN823571
	JW 221010	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824597	MN824746	MN823423	MN823572
	JW 220011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824598	MN824747	MN823424	MN823573
	JW 241011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824599	MN824748	MN823425	MN823574
	JW 94009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824600	MN824749	MN823426	MN823575
	CBS 527.66; FMR 15337	Wheat field soil	Germany	LT623269	FJ427111	GU238073	FJ427000
	JW 63001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824601	MN824750	MN823427	MN823576
	JW 168007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824602	MN824751	MN823428	MN823577
Leptosphaeria doliolum	CBS 505.75^T	Urtica dioica	The Netherlands	KT389640	JF740144	GQ387576	JF740205
Leptosphaerulina australis	CBS 311.51	Lawn	Switzerland	–	–	FJ795508	–
L. saccharicola	CBS 939.69	Soil	The Netherlands	–	GU237541	JX681098	GU237911
L. trifolii	CBS 235.58	Trifolium sp.	The Netherlands	–	GU237542	GU237982	GU237806
Macroventuria anomochaeta	CBS 525.71^T	Decayed canvas	South Africa	GU456346	GU237544	GU237984	GU237881
Ma. wentii	CBS 526.71^T	Plant litter	USA	KT389642	GU237546	GU237986	GU237884
Microsphaeropsis olivacea	CBS 233.77	Pinus laricio	France	KT389643	GU237549	GU237988	GU237803
Microsphaeropsis olivacea	CBS 442.83	Taxus baccata	The Netherlands	–	GU237547	EU754171	GU237865
Mi. proteae	CBS 111319^T; CPC 1425	Protea nitida	Unknown	–	JN712650	JN712563	JN712497
Neoascochyta argentina	CBS 112524^T	Triticum aestivum	Argentina	–	KT389822	KT389742	KT389524
Neoa. desmazieri	CBS 297.69^T	Lolium perenne	Germany	KT389644	KT389806	KT389726	KT389508
Neoa. paspali	CBS 560.81^T; PDDCC 6614	Paspalum dilatatum	New Zealand	KP330426	FJ427158	GU238124	FJ427048
Neoa. tardicrebrescens	CBS 689.97^T	Hay	Norway	KT389654	KT389824	KT389744	KT389526
Neoa. triticicola	CBS 544.74^T	Triticum aestivum	South Africa	KT389652	GU237488	EU754134	GU237887
Neodidymelliopsis cannabis	CBS 234.37	Cannabis sativa	Unknown	KP330403	GU237523	GU237961	GU237804
Neodidymelliopsis cannabis	CBS 121.75^T; IMI 194767; PD 73/584	Urtica dioica	The Netherlands	–	GU237535	GU237972	GU237761
Neod. polemonii	CBS 109181^T; PD 83/757	Polemonium caeruleum	The Netherlands	KP330427	GU237648	GU238133	GU237746
Neod. xanthina	CBS 383.68^T	Delphinium sp.	The Netherlands	KP330431	GU237668	GU238157	GU237855
Neomicrosphaeropsis italica	MFLUCC 16-0284	Tamarix sp.	Italy	KU714604	–	KU900296	KU900321
	MFLUCC 15-0484	Tamarix sp.	Italy	KU695539	–	KU729853	KU900319
	MFLUCC 15-0485^T	Tamarix sp.	Italy	KU674820	–	KU729854	KU900318
Nothophoma anigozanthi	CBS 381.91^T; FMR 14914	Anigozanthus maugleisii	The Netherlands	KT389655	GU237580	GU238039	GU237852
N. arachidis-hypogaeae	CBS 125.93^R; PD 77/1029	Arachis hypogaea	India	KT389656	GU237583	GU238043	GU237771
N. brennandiae	JW 1066	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824603	MN824752	MN823429	MN823578
	CBS 145912^T; JW 53011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824604	MN824753	MN823430	MN823579
	MFLUCC 16-1392	Ulmus (×) hollandica	Italy	KY053898	KY053899	KY053897	KY053896
N. gossypiicola	CBS 377.67; FMR 14912	Gossypium sp.	USA	KT389658	GU237611	GU238079	GU237845
N. gossypiicola	UTHSC:DI16-294	Human deep tissue/ fluids	USA	LT593082	LT593012	LN907437	LT592943
N. infossa	CBS 123395^T	Fraxinus pennsylvanica	Argentina	KT389659	FJ427135	GU238089	FJ427025
N. infossa	CBS 123394	Fraxinus pennsylvanica	Argentina	–	FJ427134	GU238088	FJ427024
N. macrospora	CBS 140674^T; FMR 13767	Human respiratory tract	USA	LT593073	LN880539	LN880537	LN880536
N. pruni	MFLUCC 18-1600^T	Prunus avium	China	MH853664	MH853671	MH827028	MH827007
N. quercina	MFLUCC 18-1588	Prunus avium	China	MH853665	MH853672	MH827029	MH827008
	CBS 633.92^R; ATCC 36786	Microsphaera alphitoides from Quercus sp.	Ukraine	KT389657	GU237609	EU754127	GU237900
	UTHSC:DI16-270; FMR 13761	Human superficial tissue	USA	LT593067	LT592998	LN907413	LT592929
N. variabilis	CBS 142457^T; FMR 13777	Human respiratory tract	USA	LT593078	LT593008	LN907428	LT592939
Paraboeremia adianticola	CBS 260.92; PD 86/1103	Pteris ensiformis	Unknown	–	KT389832	KT389752	KT389534
P. adianticola	CBS 187.83; PD 82/128; FMR 15344	Polystichum adiantiforme	USA	KP330401	GU237576	GU238035	GU237796
P. camelliae	CGMCC 3.18108	Camellia sp.	China	KX829052	KX829060	KX829044	KX829036
	CGMCC 3.18106^T	Camellia sp.	China	KX829050	KX829058	KX829042	KX829034
	CGMCC 3.18107	Camellia sp.	China	KX829051	KX829059	KX829043	KX829035
P. litseae	CGMCC 3.18110; LC 5030	Litsea sp.	China	KX829046	KX829054	KX829038	KX829030
	JW 157001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824519	MN824667	MN823344	MN823493
	CGMCC 3.18109^T; LC 5028	Litsea sp.	China	KX829045	KX829053	KX829037	KX829029
P. putaminum	JW 110005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824480	MN824628	MN823305	MN823454
	JW 126003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824481	MN824629	MN823306	MN823455
	JW 265009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824482	MN824630	MN823307	MN823456
	JW 221011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824483	MN824631	MN823308	MN823457
	JW 165006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824484	MN824632	MN823309	MN823458
	JW 232004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824485	MN824633	MN823310	MN823459
	JW 192007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824486	MN824634	MN823311	MN823460
	JW 125011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824487	MN824635	MN823312	MN823461
	JW 18014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824488	MN824636	MN823313	MN823462
	JW 142002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824489	MN824637	MN823314	MN823463
	JW 221018	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824490	MN824638	MN823315	MN823464
	JW 238003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824491	MN824639	MN823316	MN823465
	JW 192019	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824492	MN824640	MN823317	MN823466
	JW 213009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824493	MN824641	MN823318	MN823467
	JW 226017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824494	MN824642	MN823319	MN823468
	JW 109022	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824495	MN824643	MN823320	MN823469
	JW 4002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824496	MN824644	MN823321	MN823470
	CBS 130.69^R; IMI 331916	Malus sylvestris	Denmark	–	GU237652	GU238138	GU237777
	JW 16015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824497	MN824645	MN823322	MN823471
	JW 16001	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824498	MN824646	MN823323	MN823472
	JW 25002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824499	MN824647	MN823324	MN823473
	JW 276009	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824500	MN824648	MN823325	MN823474
	JW 48011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824501	MN824649	MN823326	MN823475
	JW 4011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824502	MN824650	MN823327	MN823476
	JW 276008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824503	MN824651	MN823328	MN823477
	JW 65008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824505	MN824653	MN823330	MN823479
	JW 132016	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824506	MN824654	MN823331	MN823480
	JW 226014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824507	MN824655	MN823332	MN823481
	JW 226015	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824508	MN824656	MN823333	MN823482
	JW 25012	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824509	MN824657	MN823334	MN823483
P. putaminum	JW 11007	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824510	MN824658	MN823335	MN823484
	JW 129005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824511	MN824659	MN823336	MN823485
	CBS 372.91^R; PD 75/690	Ceratocystis ulmi	The Netherlands	–	GU237651	GU238137	GU237843
	JW 145026	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824504	MN824652	MN823329	MN823478
	JW 4006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824512	MN824660	MN823337	MN823486
	JW 191017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824513	MN824661	MN823338	MN823487
	JW 161002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824514	MN824662	MN823339	MN823488
	JW 116031	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824515	MN824663	MN823340	MN823489
	JW 1008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824516	MN824664	MN823341	MN823490
	JW 1020	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824517	MN824665	MN823342	MN823491
	JW 1046	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824518	MN824666	MN823343	MN823492
P. rekkeri	JW 13016	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824526	MN824674	MN823351	MN823500
	JW 13030	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824527	MN824675	MN823352	MN823501
	JW 79024	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824528	MN824676	MN823353	MN823502
	JW 25013	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824529	MN824677	MN823354	MN823503
	JW 167006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824530	MN824678	MN823355	MN823504
	JW 132004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824531	MN824679	MN823356	MN823505
	CBS 144949; JW 4024	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824532	MN824680	MN823357	MN823506
	JW 13017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824533	MN824681	MN823358	MN823507
	JW 91008	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824534	MN824682	MN823359	MN823508
	JW 226002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824535	MN824683	MN823360	MN823509
	JW 3018	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824536	MN824684	MN823361	MN823510
	CBS 144955^T; JW 172002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824537	MN824685	MN823362	MN823511
	JW 51014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824538	MN824686	MN823363	MN823512
	JW 196020	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824539	MN824687	MN823364	MN823513
	CBS 144950; JW 6005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824540	MN824688	MN823365	MN823514
P. selaginellae	CBS 122.93^T; PD 77/1049	Selaginella sp.	The Netherlands	–	GU237656	GU238142	GU237762
P. truiniorum	JW 270002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824520	MN824668	MN823345	MN823494
	CBS 144952^T; JW 47002	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824521	MN824669	MN823346	MN823495
	JW 147025	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824522	MN824670	MN823347	MN823496
	JW 182014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824523	MN824671	MN823348	MN823497
	JW 192003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824524	MN824672	MN823349	MN823498
	CBS 144961; JW 203021	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824525	MN824673	MN823350	MN823499
Phoma herbarum	CBS 274.37	Picea excelsa	UK	KT389662	KT389835	KT389754	KT389537
Phoma herbarum	CBS 615.75^R; IMI 199779; PD 73/655	Rosa multiflora cv. cathayensis	The Netherlands	KP330420	FJ427133	EU754186	FJ427022
Phomatodes aubrietiae	CBS 627.97^T; PD 70/714	Aubrietia sp.	The Netherlands	KT389665	GU237585	GU238045	GU237895
Phomat. nebulosa	JW 166004	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824609	MN824758	MN823435	MN823584
	JW 166006	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824610	MN824759	MN823436	MN823585
	JW 166013	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824611	MN824760	MN823437	MN823586
	CBS 100191	Thlapsi arvense	Poland	KT389666	KP330390	KP330446	KP330434
	CBS 117.93; PD 83/90	Mercurialis perennis	The Netherlands	KP330425	GU237633	GU238114	GU237757
Pseudoascochyta novae-zelandiae	CBS 141689^T; FMR 15110	Cordyline australis	New Zealand	LT592895	LT592894	LT592893	LT592892
Pse. pratensis	CBS 141688^T; FMR 14524	Soil	Spain	LT223133	LT223132	LT223131	LT223130
Remotididymella anthropophylica	CBS 142462^T; FMR 13770	Human respiratory tract	USA	LT593075	LT593005	LN907421	LT592936
R. destructiva	CBS 378.73^T; FMR 15328	Lycopersicon esculentum	Tonga	LT623258	GU237601	GU238063	GU237849
Stagonosporopsis andigena	CBS 269.80; PD 75/914	Solanum sp.	Peru	–	GU237675	GU238170	GU237817
S. astragali	CBS 178.25^R; MUCL 9915	Astragalus sp.	Unknown	–	GU237677	GU238172	GU237792
S. bomiensis	LC 8168	Boraginaceae	China	KY742190	KY742366	KY742278	KY742124
S. bomiensis	CGMCC 3.18366^T; LC 8167	Boraginaceae	China	KY742189	KY742365	KY742277	KY742123
S. crystalliniformis	CBS 713.85^T; ATCC 76027; PD 83/826	Lycopersicon esculentum	Colombia	KT389675	GU237683	GU238178	GU237903
S. dorenboschii	CBS 426.90^T; IMI 386093; PD 86/551	Physostegia virginiana	The Netherlands	KT389678	GU237690	GU238185	GU237862
S. hortensis	CBS 104.42^R	–	The Netherlands	KT389680	GU237703	GU238198	GU237730
S. hortensis	CBS 572.85; PD 79/269	Phaseolus vulgaris	The Netherlands	KT389681	GU237704	GU238199	GU237893
S. loticola	CBS 562.81^T; PDDCC 6884	Lotus pedunculatus	New Zealand	KT389684	GU237697	GU238192	GU237890
S. papillata	LC 8170	Rumex nepalensis	China	KY742192	KY742368	KY742280	KY742126
S. papillata	CGMCC 3.18367^T; LC 8169	Rumex nepalensis	China	KY742191	KY742367	KY742279	KY742125
S. stuijvenbergii	CBS 144953^T; JW 132011	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824475	MN824623	MN823300	MN823449
	JW 33021	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824476	MN824624	MN823301	MN823450
	JW 14003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824477	MN824625	MN823302	MN823451
	JW 44014	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824478	MN824626	MN823303	MN823452
S. weymaniae	CBS 144959^T; JW 201003	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824479	MN824627	MN823304	MN823453
Vacuiphoma bulgarica	CBS 357.84^T	Trachystemon orientale	Bulgaria	LT623256	GU237589	GU238050	GU237837
Vac. oculihominis	UTHSC:DI16-308^T; FMR 13801	Human superficial tissue	USA	LT593093	LT593023	LN907451	LT592954
**Vandijckomycella joseae**	CBS 144948; JW 1068	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824614	MN824763	MN823440	MN823589
**Van. joseae**	CBS 143011^T; JW 1073	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824615	MN824764	MN823441	MN823590
**Van. snoekiae**	CBS 144954^T; JW 149017	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824616	MN824765	MN823442	MN823591
Xenodidymella applanata	CBS 115577	Rubus idaeus	Sweden	KT389688	KT389850	KT389762	KT389546
	CBS 195.36^T	Rubus idaeus	The Netherlands	–	KT389852	KT389764	KT389548
	CBS 205.63	Rubus idaeus	The Netherlands	KP330402	GU237556	GU237998	GU237798
	CBS 115578	Rubus arcticus nothossp. stellarcticus	Sweden	–	KT389851	KT389763	KT389547
X. asphodeli	CBS 375.62^T	Asphodelus albus	France	KT389689	KT389853	KT389765	KT389549
X. asphodeli	CBS 499.72	Asphodelus ramosus	Italy	–	KT389853	KT389766	KT389550
X. catariae	CBS 102635; PD 77/1131	Nepeta catenaria	The Netherlands	KP330404	GU237524	GU237962	GU237727
X. humicola	CBS 220.85^R; PD 71/1030	Franseria sp.	USA	KP330422	GU237617	GU238086	GU237800
X. weymaniae	CBS 144960^T; JW 201005	Garden soil	The Netherlands	MN824613	MN824762	MN823439	MN823588

Open in a new tab

¹ New species are marked in bold. ²ATCC = American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, USA; CBS = Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CGMCC = China General Microbiological Culture Collection, Beijing, China; CPC = Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; FMR = Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain; JW = Johanna Westerdijk working collection housed at the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; LC = Personal culture collection of Lei Cai, housed at CAS, China; MFLUCC = Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; PD = Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, the Netherlands; PDDCC = Plant Diseases Division Culture Collection, Auckland, New Zealand; UTHSC = Fungus Testing Laboratory at the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. ^T and ^R indicate ex-type and representative strains, respectively. ³rpb2: partial RNA polymerase II second largest subunit gene; tub2: partial β-tubulin gene; ITS: internal transcribed spacers and intervening 5.8S nrDNA; LSU: partial large subunit nrDNA. Strains representing new species are marked in bold. Sequences generated in this study are marked in bold.

Selection of Didymellaceae strains

A preliminary species identification of the strains was carried-out by a BLASTn search performed with each ITS and/or LSU sequence against the NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and WI (http://www.westerdijkinstitute.nl/Collections) databases. The ITS and/or LSU sequences generated in this study with more than 98 % similarity with reference sequences for Didymellaceae were selected for further study (Table 1).

Sequence alignment and molecular phylogenetic analysis

To further study the phylogenetic relationships, reference sequences of Didymellaceae were downloaded from GenBank (Table 1). Sequences of single loci were aligned with MAFFT v.7 using default settings (Katoh et al. 2017), and manually edited in MEGA v.6.0 when necessary (Tamura et al. 2013). MrModeltest v.2.3 (Nylander 2004) was used to select the best-fit models of evolution for the four data partitions according to the Akaike information criterion. Bayesian inference (BI), maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) methods were implemented for phylogenetic analysis of individual gene regions and the combined dataset. The multi-locus gene dataset was generated using SequenceMatrix v.1.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011).

Bayesian analyses were performed using MrBayes v.3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) as described by Chen et al. (2015). The burn-in fraction was set to 0.25, after which the 50 % majority rule consensus trees and posterior probability (PP) values were calculated. The ML analyses including 1000 bootstrap replicates were conducted using RAxML v.7.2.6 (Stamatakis and Alachiotis et al. 2010) as described by Chen et al. (2015). Statistical support for the branches was evaluated using a bootstrap analysis (BS) of 1000 replicates. MP analyses were carried out using PAUP v.4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) as described by Braun et al. (2018). Statistical support for the branches was evaluated using a bootstrap analysis (PBS) of 1000 replicates. Trees were visualised in FigTree v.1.4.0 (Rambaut 2014) and the layout was created in Adobe Illustrator. Alignments and phylogenetic trees derived from this study were uploaded to TreeBASE (www.treebase.org) and sequences deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

Morphological characterisation

Isolates of Didymellaceae were transferred to fresh oatmeal agar (OA), 2 % malt extract agar (MEA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Crous et al. 2019) plates and incubated at 25 °C under near-ultraviolet (UV) light (12 h light/12 h dark) to induce sporulation. Colony diameters were measured after 7 d of incubation (Boerema et al. 2004), and macroscopic characters and colony colours were described after 14 days of incubation and rated according to the colour charts of Rayner (1970). Preparations were mounted in distilled water to study the micro-morphological structures of mature conidiomata, conidiogenous cells and conidia from OA cultures (Aveskamp et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2015). Morphological observations included the general characteristics of the conidiomata, shape, presence of mycelium/setae on conidiomata, number of ostioles, thickness and texture of the pycnidial wall, length and width of the conidiogenous cells and conidia. To study the pycnidial wall, sections of mature conidiomata were generated using a Leica CM 1900 freezing microtome (Aveskamp et al. 2010; Chen et al. 2015). Observations of micro-morphological characteristics were processed with a Nikon Eclipse 80i compound microscope with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics and a Nikon AZ100 dissecting microscope, both equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri2 high-definition colour digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using NIS-elements imaging software v.4.3. The NaOH spot test was carried out using a drop of concentrated NaOH to determine the secretion of metabolite E on OA cultures (Boerema et al. 2004). Morphological descriptions and taxonomic information for the new taxa were deposited in MycoBank (Crous et al. 2004).

Results

A total of 293 soil samples were analysed, and nearly 3000 fungal strains were obtained. Among them, 148 Didymellaceae isolates were identified from 89 different garden soil samples, representing several locations in the Netherlands (Table 1).

Phylogenetic identification

A multi-locus phylogeny comprising 325 strains, including the JW soil isolates and reference strains from GenBank, was used to infer the relationships among species in Didymellaceae (Figure 1, Table 1). Coniothyrium palmarum (CBS 400.71) and Leptosphaeria doliolum (CBS 505.75) were used as outgroups. The final combined ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tub2 alignment comprised 2317 characters including gaps (500 for ITS; 859 for LSU; 602 for rpb2; 356 for tub2), of which 1563 characters were constant, 106 parsimony-uninformative, and 618 were parsimony-informative. For the Bayesian analysis, SYM+I+G was selected as the best-fit model for the ITS dataset, and GTR+I+G was selected as the best model for the LSU, tub2 and rpb2 datasets. The phylogenetic trees obtained with three analyses showed a similar topology and were congruent with each other, and only the ML tree is presented herein with BS, PP, and PBS values plotted on the branches (Figure 1).

In the phylogenetic analysis, the 148 isolates from Dutch soil were distributed in 10 clades (Figure 1). The majority of the isolates clustered in Juxtiphoma (n=63) which were recovered from 48 soil samples and 28 cities, followed by Paraboeremia (n=61) from 29 soil samples and 19 cities. Other isolates belonged to Didymella spp. (n=5), Stagonosporopsis spp. (n=5), Ascochyta spp. (n=4), Phomatodes nebulosa (n=3), Nothophoma spp. (n=2), Calophoma clematidis (n=1), and Xenodidymella applanata (n=1), and three isolates clustered in an unknown clade (Figure 1, Table 1).

In the Juxtiphoma clade species clustered in two lineages, one corresponding to J. eupyrena (77/1/-) and the other representing a potentially new species (100/1/99). In the Paraboeremia clade, the soil isolates clustered in P. putaminum (86/0.99/67) and P. litseae (98/1/97). However, 21 isolates were distributed in two different lineages (with 6 and 15 isolates, respectively) that were phylogenetically distant from other species, representing two potentially new taxa. The soil isolates belonging to Stagonosporopsis clustered in a clade (100/1/99) that was phylogenetically distant from the other species, representing two potentially new species. In Didymella, the species were distributed in D. macrostoma (100/1/100) and D. pomorum (100/1/100), while isolates JW 195004 and JW 27006 were placed in two different branches, representing two putative new species. In Ascochyta one isolate grouped with A. syringae (93/1/86), whereas three isolates grouped in a different clade distant from previously known species, representing a potentially new species (100/1/100). The other three isolates grouped together at the bottom of the tree in a distant unknown lineage, which is introduced herein as a new genus with two species (100/1/90). All the new taxa are introduced in the taxonomy section based on the phylogenetic analysis and supported by morphological data. Descriptions and illustrations of the new taxa are provided in the taxonomy section below.

Loci resolution

The single locus phylogenies of rpb2 and tub2 performed quite well at both generic and species levels. The rpb2 phylogeny was able to discriminate all 27 generic clades included in the phylogeny (Figure 1), with good resolution of species among these genera (140 of 143 species). The tub2 phylogeny was able to distinguish 26 of 27 generic clades recognising 134 of 143 species, but proved unsuccessful for Vacuiphoma and Ascochyta, mainly because species of these genera did not cluster into monophyletic lineages, but were sometimes intermixed or formed separate lineages. However, the LSU phylogeny displayed a low resolution at both generic and species levels, being able to distinguish only 12 of 27 genera and 50 of 143 species. The ITS phylogeny was able to distinguish 17 of the 27 generic clades and 44 of the 143 species.

Taxonomy

Ascochyta benningiorum

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

79C53355-2002-5B6C-B44A-5142F644BAA9

833194

Figure 2

Etymology.

benningiorum refers to Eva, Bas & Anne Benning who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Gelderland province, Wijchen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, E. Benning, B. Benning & A. Benning (holotype designated here CBS H-24104, living ex-type culture CBS 144957 = JW 196005).

Conidiomata pycnidial, mostly solitary, sometimes confluent, globose or subglobose, irregularly-shaped with age, brown to dark brown, glabrous, mostly produced on the agar surface and some immersed, 140–480(–580) × 100–370(–440) μm; with 1–6(–10) slightly papillate ostioles; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 4–8 layers, 14.5–65 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells of 11–28 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, ampulliform to lageniform, 5.5–9 × 4–6.5 μm. Conidia cylindrical, hyaline, smooth- and thin-walled, mostly straight, occasionally curved, aseptate, (3.5–)4.5–7 × 1.5–2.5 μm, 2-guttulate, small. Conidia matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, olivaceous to olivaceous black, buff towards the periphery, abundant production of pycnidia, margin irregular; reverse concolorous with the surface. On MEA reaching 40–45 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, concentric circles, centre pink, grey olivaceous, mouse grey, rosy buff toward periphery, moderate production of pycnidia, margin irregular; reverse orange, olivaceous black toward periphery. On PDA reaching 45–50 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, dark brick to olivaceous grey, buff towards periphery, abundant production of pycnidia, margin irregular; reverse concolorous with the surface. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimens examined.

The Netherlands. Gelderland province, Wijchen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, E. Benning, B. Benning & A. Benning, JW 196023 = CBS 144958; ibid. JW 196013.

Notes.

Ascochyta benningiorum is represented in the phylogenetic tree by three isolates (CBS 144957, CBS 144958 and JW 196013) from the same soil sample collected in Wijchen (Gelderland province). Ascochyta benningiorum grouped in a distinct clade close to A. phacae (Figure 1). However, it morphologically differs from A. phacae by having smaller (3.5–7 × 1.5–2.5 μm) and aseptate conidia. In A. phacae the conidia are 7–10 × 2–4 μm and 0–1-septate (Corbaz 1955).

Species in Ascochyta are commonly regarded as plant pathogens, especially of cereal crops and legumes (Davidson and Kimber 2007; Tivoli and Banniza 2007), and only a few species were reported from soil, namely A. fabae, A. lentis, A. pisi, A. rabiei (Gossen and Morrall 1986; Tivoli and Banniza 2007) and A. syringae in the current study. Nevertheless, A. benningiorum is phylogenetically and morphologically distinct from these species (Figure 1; Chen et al. 2015).

Didymella degraaffiae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

34012AEA-3742-51D5-A477-323A0BB8B57B

833195

Figure 3

Etymology.

degraaffiae refers to Janne de Graaff who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Limburg province, Weert, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J. de Graaff (holotype designated here CBS H-24105, living ex-type culture CBS 144956 = JW 195004).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial on the agar or semi-immersed in the agar, scattered or aggregated, mostly confluent, globose, subglobose, lageniform to irregularly-shaped with age, brown to dark brown, ostiolate, covered by hyphal outgrowths, especially near the ostiole, 150–485 × 120–330 μm; non-papillate or with up to two papillate ostioles; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–6 layers, 10–55 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, isodiametric cells, 16–33 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, ampulliform, lageniform, pyriform or globose, 5.5–8.5 × 5–8 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal, oblong or oval, thin- and smooth-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 4.5–9(–11) × 3–4.5 μm, 2–6-guttulate, small. Conidial matrix milky white.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 65–70 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, orange to olivaceous, margin regular; reverse black near the centre, pale grey towards the periphery. On MEA reaching 55–60 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, buff to pale olivaceous, with white mycelium pellet and radially furrowed zones near the centre, margin regular; reverse buff near the centre, olivaceous to yellow towards the periphery. On PDA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, concentric circles pale brown, pale olivaceous grey, dark olivaceous, honey, margin irregular; reverse black with a pale olivaceous edge. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Notes.

In our phylogenetic analysis, D. degraaffiae grouped with D. americana and D. maydis (Figure 1). However, morphologically, D. americana differs by its smaller conidiogenous cells (3–5 × 3–4 μm) and conidia (5–7 × 2–2.5 μm) (Boerema 1993); while D. maydis differs in having larger conidia (15–17 × 3.5–5 μm) (de Gruyter 2002). Furthermore, D. americana and D. maydis occasionally produced 1-septate conidia, while septate conidia were not observed in D. degraaffiae.

Didymella kooimaniorum

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

667CE759-730C-5AB7-8C08-7077CFF0CB63

833196

Figure 4

Etymology.

kooimaniorum refers to Noud & Robin Kooiman who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Vleuten, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, N. Kooiman & R. Kooiman (holotype designated here CBS H-24106, living ex-type culture CBS 144951 = JW 27006).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial or semi-immersed, scattered or solitary, sometimes confluent, globose to subglobose, irregularly-shaped with age, pale brown to brown, covered by hyphal outgrowths, especially near the ostioles, 200–375 × 195–280 μm; with 1–3(–6) papillate ostioles; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–5 layers, 10–35 μm thick, outer layers composed of pale brown, flattened polygonal cells of 16–32 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, ampulliform, lageniform or somewhat isodiametric, (4.5–)5.5–10 × 3.5–9 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, straight, thin- and smooth-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–7 × 2–3 μm, 2-guttulate, big. Conidial matrix buff.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 55–60 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, pale smoke grey, pale brown towards periphery, abundant production of confluent pycnidia, margin regular; reverse pale olivaceous, with some olivaceous black zones. On MEA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium woolly, pale olivaceous grey, margin irregular; reverse buff near the centre, dark brown with orange edge. On PDA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, pale mouse grey with olivaceous edge, margin irregular; reverse dark brown with pale brown edge. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Notes.

Based on the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, D. kooimaniorum forms an independent branch, clearly separated from other species in Didymella (Figure 1). Morphologically, D. kooimaniorum is characterised by pale brown pycnidia densely covered by long hairs, and ostioles with up to six papillae with a darker neck.

Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

329B1DDF-FA2D-5C9F-AE49-B48ABAA4553D

833197

Figure 5

Etymology.

kolkmaniorum refers to Linde & Mette Kolkman who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Ophemert, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, L. & M. Kolkman (holotype designated here CBS H-24214, living ex-type culture CBS 146005 = JW 185006).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial, solitary or confluent, globose to subglobose, brown to dark brown, glabrous, covered by dark hyphae and chlamydospores, 100–350 μm; uniostiolate papillate; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 2–4 layers, 7.5–12.5 μm thick, outer layer composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells. Conidiogenous cells mono- or polyphialidic, hyaline, smooth, subcylindrical, ampulliform or somewhat isodiametric, 5.5–11.5 × 2.5–5.5 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, straight or curved, thin- and smooth-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–7.5 × 2–3 μm, 1–3-guttulate, medium. Conidial matrix white to buff. Chlamydospores terminal or intercalary, solitary, or in simple or branched chains, barrel-shaped, subglobose or ellipsoidal, pale brown to brown, guttulate, 5.5–12 × 4–8 μm.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 45–60 mm diam, aerial mycelium cottony to floccose, isabelline to olivaceous, margin irregular; reverse concolorous. On MEA reaching 45–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium cottony to floccose, smoke grey to pale olivaceous grey with white edge, margin entire; reverse buff to smoke grey near the centre, olivaceous black with buff edge. On PDA reaching 45–50 mm diam, aerial mycelium cottony to floccose, olivaceous buff, dull green to buff, margin irregular; reverse smoke grey near the centre, olivaceous black with buff edge. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimens examined.

Germany. Kiel-Kitzeberg, from wheat field soil, 1966, W. Gams, living cultures CBS 527.66 = FMR 15337 = ATCC 22238; The Netherlands. North Brabant province, Breda, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, F. Versantvoort, JW 167004; ibid. JW 168007; Rijen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, G. & L. Schijvenaars, JW 94009. North Holland province, Hilversum, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, S. Nieuwenhuijsen, JW 23021. Utrecht province, Amersfoort, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, M. Kerssen, JW 125028; Amersfoort, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, E., K. & O. de Jong Verpaalen, JW 241011; Amersfoort, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, F. Wiegerinck, specimen CBS H-24102, culture CBS 145911 = JW 4017; Amersfoort, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, T. & K. Wesselink, JW 191004; Bilthoven, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, Y. El Ghazi, JW 220011; Utrecht, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J. Kooijmans, JW 63001.

Notes.

Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum is very similar and phylogenetically close to J. eupyrena. However, based on the multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, J. kolkmaniorum forms a separate clade (Figure 1). Morphologically, J. kolkmaniorum has conidia slightly larger and with more guttules than those of J. eupyrena (3.5–7.5 × 2–3 μm, 1–3-guttulate vs. 4.2–5.6 × 1.8–2.4 μm, 2-guttulate, de Gruyter and Noordeloos 1992) and smaller chlamydospores (5.5–12 × 4–8 μm vs. 8–20 × 6–15 μm, de Gruyter and Noordeloos 1992).

Nothophoma brennandiae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

ED31092F-7A61-5A8A-BD8E-CF112EDB1A15

833198

Figure 6

Etymology.

brennandiae refers to Kristel Brennand who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Limburg province, Ell, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, K. Brennand (holotype designated here CBS H-24103, living ex-type culture CBS 145912 = JW 53011).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial to semi-immersed, solitary to confluent, globose to subglobose, irregularly-shaped with age, brown, setose, especially near the ostioles, 155–350 × 100–300 μm; with 1–4 papillate ostioles; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–6 layers, 13.5–21.5 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, ampulliform or somewhat isodiametric, 3–5 × 5–8 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal, broadly ellipsoidal to oblong, straight, thick- and smooth-walled, hyaline becoming brown, aseptate, 3–8.5 × 1.5–3 μm, 1–6-guttulate, minute. Conidial matrix sepia to brown vinaceous.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium scarce, spore mass with grease-like appearance, dark brick to sepia, cinnamon to the edge, abundant production of confluent pycnidia, margin entire; reverse concentric rings umber to cinnamon. On MEA reaching 47–50 mm diam, aerial mycelium scarce, spore mass with grease-like appearance, dark brick to sepia, cinnamon to the edge, abundant production of confluent pycnidia, margin entire; reverse concentric rings umber to cinnamon. On PDA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium moderate to scarce, cottony, buff, spore mass with grease-like appearance, dark brick, ochreous to the edge, margin entire; reverse concentric rings dark brick to cinnamon. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimen examined.

The Netherlands. North Holland province, Amsterdam, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J. van Dijk, JW 1066.

Notes.

In the phylogenetic tree N. brennandiae was close to N. quercina and N. pruni (Figure 1). Morphologically, N. brennandiae can be distinguished from N. quercina by having setose conidiomata with up to 4 ostioles, while in N. quercina conidiomata are glabrous with a single ostiole (Sydow and Sydow 1915; Aveskamp et al. 2010). Furthermore, conidia in N. quercina are larger and have less guttules (5.5–9 × 2.5–5 μm, 0–2(–3) guttules) (Sydow and Sydow 1915; Aveskamp et al. 2010). On the other hand, N. pruni is characterised by hyaline conidia (Chethana et al. 2019), while N. brennandiae produces conidia that turn brown with age.

Paraboeremia rekkeri

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

2D1ADC7E-658B-55A1-8696-E151FF5BDEC6

833199

Figure 7

Etymology.

rekkeri refers to Daan Rekker who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Gelderland province, Geldermalsen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, D. Rekker (holotype designated here CBS H-24107, living ex-type culture CBS 144955 = JW 172002).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial, scattered or aggregated, solitary or confluent, globose or subglobose, irregularly-shaped with age, buff to brown, covered with abundant mycelial outgrowths especially when young, 150–390 × 120–320 μm; 1–2 papillate or non-papillate ostioles; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–7 layers, 17.5–37 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells, 10–21 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, subglobose or ampulliform, 5–10 × 4.5–7.5 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, thin- and smooth-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–5 × 2.5–3 μm, with 2(–3) large guttules. Conidial matrix pink.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 75–80 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, saffron, vinaceous buff, pale olivaceous, margin regular; reverse concentric circles saffron, grey, olivaceous grey. On MEA reaching 55–60 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, margin irregular, pale olivaceous grey to whitish, orange near edge; reverse brown to dark brown, orange towards the periphery. On PDA reaching 70–75 mm diam, margin irregular, covered by felty aerial mycelium, buff, olivaceous grey towards periphery; reverse mouse, olivaceous towards periphery. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimens examined.

Gelderland province, Culemborg, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, H. van de Warenburg, JW 3018; Kapel-Avezaath, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, A. Panneman, JW 79024; Meteren, isolated from garden soil, S. van Stuijvenberg, JW 132004; North Brabant province, Breda, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, F. Wiegerinck, CBS 144949 = JW 4024; Breda, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, F. Versantvoort, JW 167006; Zwanenburg, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J. Rebergen, JW 91008; North Holland province, Alkmaar, Mar. 2017, B. Verschoor, JW 13016, ibid. JW 13017 and JW13030; Utrecht province, Bilthoven, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, H. Vos & S. Vos, JW 51014; Eemnes, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, H.W. Vos, CBS 144950 = JW 6005; Hooglanderveen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, F. Rijpma, JW 25013; Utrecht, isolated from garden soil, R. van Zijl, JW 226002.

Notes.

Paraboeremia rekkeri formed a well-supported (1.0/100/96) distinct lineage in Paraboeremia (Figure 1). It is most closely related with P. truiniorum, another novel species collected from Dutch soil and described in the present study. However, P. rekkeri is distinguished by producing larger pycnidia (150–390 × 120–320 μm), with a thinner pycnidial wall (3–7 layers and 17.5–37 μm thick). Pycnidia in P. truiniorum are 160–420 × 135–430 μm, and have a wall of 7–11 layers and 40–70 μm thick.

Paraboeremia truiniorum

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

F8B7455D-5AFD-5C69-B571-5DDF3CE976C5

833201

Figure 8

Etymology.

truiniorum refers to Cuno & Tygo Truin who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Gelderland province, Barneveld, Voorthuizen, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, C. Truin & T. Truin (holotype designated here CBS H-24108, living ex-type culture CBS 144952 = JW 47002).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial, scattered or aggregated, most solitary, globose or subglobose, confluent and irregularly-shaped with age, pale brown, thick-walled, covered with abundant mycelial outgrowths, 160–420 × 135–430 μm; 1-papillate or non-papillate ostioles, sometimes elongated to a short neck; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 7–11 layers, 40–70 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells of 22–45.5 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, subglobose, ampulliform or doliiform, 4.5–8.5 × 4–7 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, thin- and smooth-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–5 × 2–3 μm, with (1–)2 large guttules. Conidial matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 70–75 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose, vinaceous buff to hazel, margin regular; reverse buff to olivaceous. On MEA reaching 65–70 mm diam, aerial mycelium felty, whitish, pale mouse grey toward periphery, margin regular; reverse dark brick to dark brown, with pale brown edge. On PDA reaching 75–80 mm diam, aerial mycelium felty, olivaceous buff to pale mouse grey, olivaceous toward periphery, margin irregular; reverse mouse grey, olivaceous toward periphery. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimens examined.

The Netherlands, Gelderland province, Culemborg, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, R. Fuld, JW 182014; The Netherlands. South Holland province, Alphen aan den Rijn, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, K. Boutwell, CBS 144961 = JW 203021; The Netherlands. South Holland province, Gorinchem, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, L. van Rosmalen, JW 270002; The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Utrecht, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, L. van Rijnberk, JW 147025; The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Woerden, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, L. Borsboom, JW 192003.

Notes.

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, P. truiniorum is represented by six isolates, forming a distinct lineage (Figure 1). Paraboeremia truiniorum is characterised by the dense mycelial outgrowths on its pycnidia. Both P. truiniorum and P. rekkeri are phylogenetically close to the well-known soil-borne species, P. putaminum. However, P. putaminum is distinguished from these two new species by producing smaller conidia (3.2–4.2 × 2–2.6 μm) with greenish guttules (Boerema et al 2004).

Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

0C4F7DF1-0BB7-5D4A-8D6B-1CABB52F5CE1

833203

Figure 9

Etymology.

stuijvenbergii refers to Simon van Stuijvenberg, who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Gelderland province, Meteren, from garden soil, Mar. 2017, S. van Stuijvenberg (holotype designated here CBS H-24109; living ex-type culture CBS 144953 = JW 132011).

Conidiomata pycnidial, produced on the agar surface, scattered or aggregated, solitary globose to subglobose, or 4–7(–10) confluent and irregularly-shaped, brownish, glabrous, ostiolate, 200–1000 × 195–930 μm; with 1–2 slightly papillate ostioles, sometimes elongated to a short neck; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 4–5 layers, 6.5–35 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells, 9.5–33 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, ampulliform or lageniform, 4.5–9 × 4–8 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, smooth- and thin-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–6.5 × 2–3 μm, 1–2-guttulate. Conidial matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 75–80 mm diam, floccose aerial mycelium, olivaceous to pale olivaceous, whitish to pink near the edge, margin regular; reverse iron grey. On MEA reaching 65–70 mm diam, margin regular, aerial mycelium floccose, vinaceous buff with olivaceous edge; reverse darker brown with olivaceous black edge, buff near the centre. On PDA reaching 70–75 mm diam, margin regular, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, olivaceous, olivaceous black towards periphery, with pinkish to pale brown edge; reverse iron-grey, buff towards periphery. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Additional specimens examined.

The Netherlands, Gelderland province, Arnhem, from garden soil, Mar. 2017, D. Peters, JW 14003; Utrecht province, Utrecht, from garden soil, Mar. 2017, N. Francisca, JW 44014; Utrecht, from garden soil, Mar. 2017, P. de Koff, JW 33021.

Notes.

Phylogenetically, S. stuijvenbergii is most closely related to S. weymaniae, another novel species collected from Dutch soil in this study (Figure 1). However, S. stuijvenbergii is distinguishable from S. weymaniae by the colour and the size of its pycnidia, being brown and measuring 200–1000 × 195–930 μm in S. stuijvenbergii, whereas S. weymaniae produces whitish pycnidia, measuring 330–650 × 250–550 μm. Furthermore, S. weymaniae produces microconidia and chlamydospores, which were not observed in S. stuijvenbergii. Although there are several reports that Stagonosporopsis spp. could survive in soil for a short time (Vaghefi et al. 2016), this is the first record of a Stagonosporopsis species only known from soil (Domsch et al. 2007). Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii is represented by four strains isolated from different samples collected in Utrecht and Gelderland provinces.

Stagonosporopsis weymaniae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

FEC84CB9-4916-5A72-A05A-05189B939B0E

833204

Figure 10

Etymology.

weymaniae refers to Anna Weyman, who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Baarn, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, A. Weyman (holotype designated here CBS H-24110; living ex-type culture CBS 144959 = JW 201003).

Conidiomata pycnidial, semi-immersed or immersed, mostly solitary, scattered or aggregated, (sub-)globose, whitish to buff, glabrous, 330–650 × 250–550 μm; non-ostiolate or with a single, inconspicuous ostiole; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 2–9 layers, 20–60 μm thick, outer layers composed of hyaline, flattened polygonal cells. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, (sub-)globose to ampulliform, 4.5–7.5 × 4–7.5 μm. Macroconidia oblong, smooth- and thin-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 4–6.5(–8) × 2–3 μm, 1–3(–4)-guttulate, with one large central guttule or two large polar guttules. Microconidia produced in the same pycnidia with macroconidia, globose to subglobose, smooth, hyaline, aseptate, 3–4 × 2.5–3.5 μm, with a single, small guttule. Conidial matrix whitish. Chlamydospores unicellular, intercalary in chains, barrel-shaped, thick-walled, pale brown to green brown, guttulate, 9.5–14 × 11–16 μm diam.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 70–75 mm diam, sparse aerial mycelium, buff to pale olivaceous with sparse olivaceous zones, darker grey near the centre, abundant production of buff pycnidia, margin regular; reverse pale olivaceous, olivaceous black near the centre. On MEA reaching 80–85 mm diam, margin regular, aerial mycelium floccose, yellow to vinaceous buff; reverse orange to olivaceous. On PDA reaching 75–80 mm diam, margin regular, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, centre vinaceous buff, dark olivaceous towards the periphery with production of buff pycnidia; reverse olivaceous black, olivaceous towards the periphery. NaOH spot test: pale reddish discolouration on OA plate.

Notes.

Stagonosporopsis weymaniae is phylogenetically closely related to S. stuijvenbergii (Figure 1). Morphological differences between S. weymaniae and S. stuijvenbergii are discussed under the latter species. Stagonosporopsis weymaniae together with S. stuijvenbergii formed a sister group with S. bomiensis and S. papillata, two plant pathogens from China (Chen et al. 2017). However, S. weymaniae differs from them by producing larger pycnidia [330–650 × 250–550 μm vs. 100–200 × 100–180 μm in S. bomiensis and (130–)200–280 × (100–)150–250 μm in S. papillata] and microconidia which are absent in S. papillata and S. bomiensis (Chen et al. 2017).

Vandijckomycella

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous gen. nov.

53B36B04-4D9B-5F2A-8F7C-E046793133BC

833205

Etymology.

Named in honour of José F.T.M. van Dijck, who was elected as the first female President (2015–2018) of the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW).

Type species.

Vandijckomycella joseae Hern.-Restr., L.W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous.

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial on the surface of the agar, solitary or confluent, globose to lageniform, covered by hyphal outgrowths, ostiolate, pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, with 3–9 layers. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose or ampulliform. Conidia hyaline, smooth- and thin-walled, aseptate, ovoid, oblong or ellipsoidal, with 2–4 polar guttules.

Vandijckomycella joseae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

F0D67FCC-EBBF-581B-9BAD-8232E67A1D62

833208

Figure 11

Etymology.

Named in honour of the first female President (2015–2018) of the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), José F.T.M. van Dijck, who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. North Holland province, Amsterdam, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J.F.T.M. van Dijk (holotype designated here CBS H-24112; living ex-type culture CBS 143011 = JW 1073).

Conidiomata pycnidial, produced on the agar surface, scattered or aggregated, solitary, (sub-)globose, confluent and irregularly-shaped with age, pale brown, covered in abundant long and thin mycelium hair, 150–340 × 130–250 μm; with 1–2 slightly papillate or non-papillate ostioles, sometimes elongated to a short neck; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–5 layers, 13–25 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened, polygonal cells of 10–23 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, ampulliform, lageniform or subglobose, 5–8(–9.5) × 4–8 μm. Conidia ellipsoidal to oblong, smooth- and thin-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 3.5–5.5 × 2–2.5 μm, (1–)2(–3)-guttulate. Conidial matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 75–80 mm diam after 7 d, covered by woolly aerial mycelium, concentric circles, pale olivaceous grey, pink, pale greenish grey, whitish near the edge, margin regular; reverse concentric circles dark brown, pale brown, orange, and pale olivaceous. On MEA reaching 75–80 mm diam, aerial mycelium woolly, margin regular, pale olivaceous grey; reverse dark brown, reddish towards the periphery. On PDA reaching 75–80 mm diam, margin regular, covered by felty aerial mycelium, pale olivaceous grey or olivaceous grey, with whitish parts near the centre or through the plate; reverse zonate, orange to reddish, brown and yellow. NaOH spot test: a coral discolouration on OA.

Additional specimen examined.

The Netherlands. North Holland province, Amsterdam, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, J.F.T.M. van Dijk, CBS 144948 = JW 1068.

Notes.

The new genus Vandijckomycella is introduced to accommodate two new species isolated from soil samples which form an independent lineage in Didymellaceae, being clearly separated from other genera (Figure 1). Based on the phylogenetic analysis, V. joseae forms a distinct lineage which is distant from the nearest species V. snoekiae, and chiefly differs on tub2 and rpb2 sequences. Morphological differences between V. joseae and V. snoekiae are discussed under the latter species. Vandijckomycella joseae is characterised by producing pycnidia with longer whitish hyphal outgrowths, and with elongated necks.

Vandijckomycella snoekiae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

EC229B27-79DD-51C1-BD80-7B37EEA8A92C

833207

Figure 12

Etymology.

snoekiae refers to Rana Marit Ida Snoek who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Utrecht, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, R.M.I. Snoek (holotype designated here CBS H-24111, living ex-type culture CBS 144954 = JW 149017).

Conidiomata pycnidial, superficial on the agar or covered under a thick mycelial layer, scattered or aggregated, mostly solitary, globose to subglobose, sometimes confluent, ellipsoidal, dark brown, covered by abundant long hyphal outgrowths, 150–650(–850) × 145–600(–730) μm; ostioles inconspicuous; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 5–9 layers, 37–58.5 μm thick, outer layers composed of brown, flattened polygonal cells, 10–23 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, globose, ampulliform or lageniform, 5–8.5 × 5–7.5 μm. Conidia oblong, smooth- and thin-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 4–6.5 × 2–2.5 μm, with two small polar guttules. Conidial matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 50–55 mm diam after 7 d, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, pink to grey, darker grey near the centre, margin regular; reverse black near the centre, yellow towards the periphery. On MEA reaching 50–55 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose to cottony, buff with some mouse grey zones, margin regular; reverse orange with some radial yellow lines and some black zones. On PDA, reaching 45–50 mm diam, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, vinaceous grey to pale olivaceous, olivaceous grey near the centre, margin irregular; reverse buff to orange, black near the centre. NaOH spot test on OA: pale reddish discolouration.

Notes.

Morphologically, V. snoekiae differs from its closest phylogenetic neighbour V. joseae in the size of its pycnidia and the number of ostioles. Vandijckomycella snoekiae produces larger pycnidia with inconspicuous ostioles, measuring 150–650(–850) × 145–600(–730) μm, while V. joseae produces pycnidia with 1–2 ostioles, measuring 150–340 × 130–250 μm. In addition, V. snoekiae produces conidia with less and smaller guttules than V. joseae (2 guttules, vs. 1–3 large guttules).

Xenodidymella weymaniae

Hern.-Restr., L. W. Hou, L. Cai & Crous sp. nov.

9A0B3880-71A9-571A-9B1A-A7E1D9F5BF6E

833209

Figure 13

Etymology.

weymaniae refers to Anna Weyman who collected the soil sample from which the ex-type strain was isolated.

Typus.

The Netherlands. Utrecht province, Baarn, isolated from garden soil, Mar. 2017, A. Weyman (holotype designated here CBS H-24113; living ex-type culture CBS 144960 = JW 201005).

Conidiomata pycnidial, semi-immersed on the agar, mostly confluent, sometimes solitary, scattered or aggregated, subglobose or ellipsoidal, irregularly-shaped when confluent, dark brown, ostiolate, glabrous or with long hyphal outgrowths around the ostiole, 100–700 × 100–400(–590) μm; with 1–2(–6) ostioles, papillate or elongated into a long neck, up to 113 μm in length; pycnidial wall pseudoparenchymatous, 3–5 layers, 17–45 μm thick, outer layers composed of pale brown to brown, flattened polygonal cells of 10–35 μm diam. Conidiogenous cells phialidic, hyaline, smooth, sub-globose, ampulliform or lageniform, 4.5–8 × 4–6.5 μm. Conidia oblong, smooth- and thin-walled, hyaline, aseptate, 4–6(–8) × 2–2.5 μm, with two small, polar guttules. Conidial matrix whitish.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 d at 25 °C, on OA reaching 55–60 mm diam, aerial mycelium floccose near the centre, flat towards the periphery, pale olivaceous to whitish, black pycnidia visible near the centre, margin regular; reverse buff to salmon, pale olivaceous towards the periphery. On MEA reaching 40–45 mm diam, aerial mycelium felty, sectors with cottony mycelium, white, buff to pale olivaceous, margin regular; reverse yellow to orange, dark brown and pale grey near the centre. On PDA reaching 45–60 mm, aerial mycelium floccose, whitish in the centre, honey towards the periphery, margin regular; reverse concentric circles dark brown in centre, orange, yellow, buff towards the periphery. NaOH spot test negative on OA.

Notes.

Xenodidymella weymaniae formed a distinct branch basal to X. applanata (Figure 1). Morphologically, X. weymaniae could be clearly differentiated from X. applanata in pycnidial and conidial characteristics. In X. weymaniae pycnidia are dark brown, ostioles have elongated necks, 100–700 × 100–400(–590) μm, and conidia are oblong, with 2 small polar guttules. In X. applanata pycnidia are pale brown, with single, slightly papillate ostioles, 85–175 × 60–145 μm, and ellipsoidal to ovoid conidia, with several guttules (Chen et al. 2015). Furthermore, the two species can also be distinguished from the NaOH spot test on OA medium (negative vs. pale reddish discoloration). This is the first record of a Xenodidymella species isolated from soil (Boerema et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2015, 2017).

Discussion

During the present Citizen Science project which focused on Dutch soil fungi, numerous unknown species of filamentous and yeast fungi were described (Crous et al. 2017, 2018; Groenewald et al. 2018; Giraldo et al. 2019). As part of the project, we focused on investigating species diversity of Didymellaceae from soil samples obtained in the Netherlands.

As one of the largest families in the fungal kingdom, at least 26 genera are accepted in Didymellaceae (Chen et al. 2015, 2017; Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018) and more than 5400 species names are recorded in MycoBank to date (Crous et al. 2004), representing 4.2 % of the 120000 accepted fungal species. However, only around 30 ubiquitous species have been found in the soil environment as saprophytes, mainly in Ascochyta, Boeremia, Didymella, Epicoccum and Phoma (Boerema et al. 2004; Aveskamp et al. 2008, 2010; Chen et al. 2015, 2017). In our set of samples, we found 20 species distributed in 10 genera i.e. Ascochyta, Calophoma, Didymella, Juxtiphoma, Nothophoma, Paraboeremia, Phomatodes, Stagonosporopsis, Vandijckomycella and Xenodidymella. However, we did not find any species of Phoma and Epicoccum, probably due to the media used for primary isolation, and also because of the taxonomical changes that have been suffered by many species of both genera in recent years (Aveskamp et al. 2010, Chen et al. 2015)

Paraboeremia and Juxtiphoma were the most dominant genera. Species of Paraboeremia are more common on plants than in soil, except for P. putaminum, which is regarded as a widespread soil-borne fungus isolated from the subterranean parts of various herbaceous and woody plants (de Gruyter and Noordeloos 1992; Boerema et al. 2004). In the present study this species was the most abundant species, being recovered from 29 soil samples from 19 cities. Besides P. putaminum, one isolate was identified as P. litseae, which was previously only known on diseased leaves of Litsea from China (Jiang et al. 2016). In addition, two new species were described, namely P. rekkeri found in Gelderland, North Brabant, North Holland and Utrecht provinces and P. truiniorum found in South Holland and Utrecht provinces.

The second most abundant species was Juxtiphoma eupyrena. The monotypic genus Juxtiphoma was recently introduced to accommodate Phoma eupyrena (Valenzuela-Lopez et al. 2018), a cosmopolitan soil-inhabiting fungus, which may cause damping-off of seedlings of herbaceous and woody plants (de Gruyter and Noordeloos 1992; Boerema et al. 2004; Morgan-Jones and Burch 1988), but was also reported as an opportunistic human pathogen (Bakerspigel et al. 1981). Furthermore, a new species was introduced in this genus as Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum which includes 12 of our soil isolates (JW) and one strain (CBS 527.66) isolated from soil in a wheat field in Germany.

Among our isolates we found Phomatodes nebulosa, Didymella macrostoma and D. pomorum which are plurivorous and cosmopolitan species often isolated from soil (Boerema 1993; de Gruyter et al. 1993; Farr and Rossman 2019). Interestingly, we found two species identified as plant pathogens that had not been previously reported from soil, including Ascochyta syringae and Calophoma clematidis-rectae. Ascochyta syringae causes ascochyta blight of Lilac (Syringa vulgaris) in America, Australia and Europe (Farr and Rossman 2019), while Calophoma clematidis-rectae is known on Clematidis spp. in the Netherlands (Aveskamp et al. 2010). In addition, Stagonosporopsis is recognised mainly as a phytopathogenic genus on different plant hosts (Marin-Felix et al. 2019). However, we found two new species from soil, namely S. stuijvenbergii and S. weymaniae. Other new species described include A. benningiorum, D. degraaffiae, D. kooimaniorum, N. brennandiae, V. joseae, V. snoekiae, and X. weymaniae.

These findings suggest that species of Didymellaceae are also widely distributed in soil. Previous studies have revealed that many pathogens survive in soil by producing resting bodies (Dorenbosch 1970; Aveskamp et al. 2008), such as A. pinodes (currently: Didymella pinodes) and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella (currently: Didymella pinodella) that produce chlamydospores or brown, thick-walled, swollen hyphae associated with sporocarps, which allow these species to survive in the soil for several years after the decay of their host tissues (Tivoli and Banniza 2007). On the other hand, some harmless saprobes in this family have also been observed to switch from an opportunistic to pathogenic lifestyle once in contact with the appropriate host (Aveskamp et al. 2008). Therefore, it is probable that the described new taxa are dormant in soil, remaining able to infect hosts under favourable conditions, especially species from phytopathogenic genera such as S. stuijvenbergii, S. weymaniae, N. brennandiae and X. weymaniae. However, considering that soil is a dynamic and multifunctional system and that the fungal community and its distribution are closely related to various living organisms such as plants, animals and insects, it was difficult to establish whether the species found in this study were true soil inhabitants or transferred to the soil via external vectors (such as worms, nematodes, etc.). Whether these new taxa originate from other habitats, or could change to pathogenic or endophytic lifestyles given the right conditions, remains to be determined. Furthermore, as the soil ecosystem is very complex and each type of soil and location may possess its own unique species diversity, the true diversity of Didymellaceae and their role in soil remains to be elucidated.

Recently, additional research based on cultivation-independent and cultivation-dependent methods has revealed that Didymellaceae species present in various soil environments are more diverse than one might have expected (Bell et al. 2014; Nallanchakravarthula et al. 2014; Li et al. 2016; Miao et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016a, 2016b; Chen et al. 2017; Nagano et al. 2017). Although recent high-throughput methods have detected a higher diversity of soil fungi compared with those based on culture-dependent methods, it is not possible to identify these taxa to species or even to genus level, as ITS sequence data alone are insufficient for species delimitation in most fungal families including Didymellaceae. Therefore, cultivation-dependent methods are still indispensable in the investigation of true species diversity of Didymellaceae based on additional loci such as rpb2 and tub2 obtained from cultivated isolates.

In summary, results of our study revealed the presence of a large number of unknown species and even a novel genus in soil, illustrating that this substrate is an important source for the discovery of novel taxa, and demonstrating that species diversity of Didymellaceae in soil is considerably greater than current estimates.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Ascochyta benningiorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment1.xml^{(18.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Didymella degraaffiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment2.xml^{(14.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Didymella kooimaniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment3.xml^{(11.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment4.xml^{(14KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Nothophoma brennandiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment5.xml^{(16.4KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Paraboeremia rekkeri

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment6.xml^{(12.8KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Paraboeremia truiniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment7.xml^{(13.7KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment8.xml^{(15.6KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Stagonosporopsis weymaniae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment9.xml^{(15.1KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment10.xml^{(3.4KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella joseae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment11.xml^{(12.5KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella snoekiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment12.xml^{(9.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Xenodidymella weymaniae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment13.xml^{(15.6KB, xml)}

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Utrecht University Museum and the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences for promoting the Citizen Science project, and for providing a platform to facilitate interaction with various Dutch primary schools. Lingwei Hou acknowledges CAS QYZDB-SSW-SMC044 for supporting her postgraduate studentship.

We are grateful to all the children and parents who participated in this project, collecting samples in their gardens and submitting them to the Westerdijk Institute for analyses; to José F.T.M. van Dijck, the first female President (2015–2018) of the Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences, who enthusiastically took part in this project and submitted the first soil sample in the Citizen Science Project. We are thankful to the staff from the Westerdijk Institute: Manon Verweij, Karin Schagen and Mariëtte Oosterwegel for promoting the project and establishing communication with the collectors and schools; to Trix Merkx and Arien van Iperen for depositing the isolates and specimens in the culture collection and fungarium.

Citation

Hou L, Hernández-Restrepo M, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Crous PW (2020) Citizen science project reveals high diversity in Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). MycoKeys 65: 49–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.65.47704

Contributor Information

Lei Cai, Email: cail@im.ac.cn.

Pedro W. Crous, Email: p.crous@wi.knaw.nl.

References

Anderson JPE, Domsch KH. (1973) Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration. Archives of Microbiology 93: 113–127. 10.1007/BF00424942 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Crous PW. (2008) Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fungal Diversity 31: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Woudenberg JHC, Verkley GJM, Crous PW. (2010) Highlights of the Didymellaceae: a polyphasic approach to characterise Phoma and related pleosporalean genera. Studies in Mycology 65: 1–60. 10.3114/sim.2010.65.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Aveskamp MM, Verkley GJM, de Gruyter J, Murace MA, Perelló A, Woudenberg JHC, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. (2009) DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties. Mycologia 101: 363–382. 10.3852/08-199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bakerspigel A, Lowe D, Rostas A. (1981) The isolation of Phoma eupyrena from a human lesion. Archives of Dermatology 117: 362–363. 10.1001/archderm.1981.01650060052024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bell TH, Hassan SED, Lauron-Moreau A, Al-Otaibi F, Hijri M, Yergeau E, St-Arnaud M. (2014) Linkage between bacterial and fungal rhizosphere communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils is related to plant phylogeny. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 8: 331. 10.1038/ismej.2013.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Bender SF, Plantenga F, Neftel A, Jocher M, Oberholzer HR, Kohl L, Giles M, Daniell TJ, van der Heijden MAG. (2013) Symbiotic relationships between soil fungi and plants reduce N₂O emissions from soil. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 8: 1336–1345. 10.1038/ismej.2013.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bennett A, Ponder MM, Garcia-Diaz J. (2018) Phoma infections: classification, potential food sources, and their clinical impact. Microorganisms 6: 58. 10.3390/microorganisms6030058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Boerema GH. (1993) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – II. Section Peyronellaea. Persoonia 15: 197–221. [Google Scholar]
Boerema GH, de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. (2004) Phoma identification manual. Differentiation of specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. CABI Publishing, 1–467. 10.1079/9780851997438.0000 [DOI]
Botha A. (2011) The importance and ecology of yeasts in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 1–8. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Braun U, Nakashima C, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Moreno-Rico O, Rooney-Latham S, Blomquist CL, Haas J, Marmolejo J. (2018) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Tubakia s. lat. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 1: 41–99. 10.3114/fuse.2018.01.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bridge P, Spooner B. (2001) Soil fungi: diversity and detection. Plant and Soil 232: 147–154. 10.1023/A:1010346305799 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Chen Q, Hou LW, Duan WJ, Crous PW, Cai L. (2017) Didymellaceae revisited. Studies in Mycology 87: 105–159. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen Q, Jiang JR, Zhang GZ, Cai L, Crous PW. (2015) Resolving the Phoma enigma. Studies in Mycology 82: 137–217. 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen SY, Dickson DW, Kimbrough JW. (1996) Phoma heteroderae sp. nov. isolated from eggs of Heteroderae glycines. Mycologia 88: 885–891. 10.2307/3761050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Chethana KWT, Jayawardene RS, Zhang W, Zhou YY, Liu M, Hyde KD, Li XH, Wang J, Zhang KC, Yan JY. (2019) Molecular characterization and pathogenicity of fungal taxa associated with cherry leaf spot disease. Mycosphere 10: 490–530. 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Corbaz R. (1955) Sur Didymella phacae Corbaz. Sydowia 9: 229–230. [Google Scholar]
Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Carnegie AJ, Hardy GEStJ, Smith D, Summerell BA, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Houbraken J, Lombard L, Martín MP, Sandoval-Denis M, Alexandrova AV, Barnes CW, Baseia IG, Bezerra JDP, Guarnaccia V, May TW, Hernández-Restrepo M, Stchigel AM, Miller AN, Ordoñez ME, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Agnello C, Agustin Colmán A, Albuquerque CC, Alfredo DS, Alvarado P, Araújo-Magalhães GR, Arauzo S, Atkinson Thomas, Barili A, Barreto RW, Bezerra JL, Cabral TS, Camello Rodríguez F, Cruz RHSF, Daniëls PP, da Silva BDB, de Almeida DAC, de Carvalho Júnior AA, Decock CA, Delgat L, Denman S, Dimitrov RA, Edwards J, Fedosova AG, Ferreira RJ, Firmino AL, Flores JA, Garcia D, Gené J, Giraldo A, Góis JS, Gomes AAM, Gonçalves CM, Gouliamova DE, Groenewald M, Guéorguiev BV, Guevara-Suarez M, Gusmao LFP, Hosaka K, Hubka V, Huhndorf SM, Jadan M, Jurjević Ž, Kraak B, Kučera V, Kumar TKA, Kušan I, Lacerda SR, Lamlertthon S, Lisboa WS, Loizides M, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lysková P, Mac Cormack WP, Macedo DM, Machado AR, Malysheva EF, Marinho P, Matočec N, Meijer M, Mešić A, Mongkolsamrit S, Moreira KA, Morozova OV, Nair KU, Nakamura N, Noisripoom W, Olariaga I, Oliveira RJV, Paiva LM, Pawar P, Pereira OL, Peterson SW, Prieto M, Rodríguez-Andrade E, Rojo De Blas C, Roy M, Santos ES, Sharma R, Silva GA, Souza-Motta CM, Takeuchi-Kaneko Y, Tanaka C, Thakur A, Smith MTH, Tkalčec Z, Valenzuela-Lopez N, van der Kleij P, Verbeken A, Viana MG, Wang XW, Groenewald JZ. (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 625–715. Persoonia 39: 270–467. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, Wingfield MJ, Verkley GJM, Shin HD, Nakashima C, Groenewald JZ. (2013) Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in Mycology 75: 37–114. 10.3114/sim0005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Crous PW, Verkleij GJM, Groenewald JZ, Houbraken J. (2019) Fungal Biodiversity. [Westerdijk Laboratory Manual Series No. 1] Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute publishing, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. (2004) MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21^st century. Studies in Mycology 50: 19–22. [Google Scholar]
Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ, Wingfield MJ, Carnegie AJ, Hernandez-Restrepo M, Lombard L, Roux J, Barreto RW, Baseia IG, Cano-Lira JF, Martin MP, Morozova OV, Stchigel AM, Summerell BA, Brandrud TE, Dima B, Garcia D, Giraldo A, Guarro J, Gusmao LFP, Khamsuntorn P, Noordeloos ME, Nuankaew S, Pinruan U, Rodriguez-Andrade E, Souza-Motta CM, Thangavel R, Iperen AL, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Alves JL, Andrade JP, Bahram M, Baral HO, Barbier E, Barnes CW, Bendiksen E, Bernard E, Bezerra JDP, Bezerra JL, Bizio E, Blair JE, Bulyonkova TM, Cabral TS, Caiafa MV, Cantillo T, Colman AA, Conceicao LB, Cruz S, Cunha AOB, Darveaux BA, Silva AL, da Silva GA, da Silva GM, da Silva RMF, de Oliveira RJV, Oliveira RL, De Souza JT, Duenas M, Evans HC, Epifani F, Felipe MTC, Fernandez-Lopez J, Ferreira BW, Figueiredo CN, Filippova NV, Flores JA, Gene J, Ghorbani G, Gibertoni TB, Glushakova AM, Healy R, Huhndorf SM, Iturrieta-Gonzalez I, Javan-Nikkhah M, Juciano RF, Jurjevic Z, Kachalkin AV, Keochanpheng K, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Li YC, Lima AA, Machado AR, Madrid H, Magalhaes OMC, Marbach PAS, Melanda GCS, Miller AN, Mongkolsamrit S, Nascimento RP, Oliveira TGL, Ordonez ME, Orzes R, Palma MA, Pearce CJ, Pereira OL, Perrone G, Peterson SW, Pham THG, Piontelli E, Pordel A, Quijada L, Raja HA, de Paz ER, Ryvarden L, Saitta A, Salcedo SS, Sandoval-Denis M, Santos TAB, Seifert KA, Silva BDB, Smith ME, Soares AM, Sommai S, Sousa JO, Suetrong S, Susca A, Tedersoo L, Telleria MT, Thanakitpipattana D, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Visagie CM, Zapata M, Groenewald JZ. (2018) Fungal planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 41: 238–417. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Davidson JA, Kimber RBE. (2007) Integrated disease management of ascochyta blight in pulse crops. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 99–110. 10.1007/s10658-007-9132-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
De Gruyter J. (2002) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – IX Section Macrospora. Persoonia 18: 85–102. [Google Scholar]
De Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME. (1992) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – I. 1. Section Phoma: Taxa with very small conidia in vitro. Persoonia 15: 71–92. [Google Scholar]
De Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Boerema GH. (1993) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – I. 2. Section Phoma: Additional taxa with very small conidia and taxa with conidia up to 7 um long. Persoonia 15: 369–400. [Google Scholar]
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH. (2007) Compendium of soil fungi, 2^nd edition. IHW, Eching, Germany.
Dorenbosch MM. (1970) Key to nine ubiquitous soil-borne Phoma-like fungi. Persoonia 6: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
Farr DF, Rossman AY. (2019) Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory. ARS, USDA. http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/
Frąc M, Hannula SE, Bełka M, Jedryczka M. (2018) Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 707. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Giraldo A, Hernández-Restrepo M, Crous PW. (2019) New plectosphaerellaceous species from Dutch garden soil. Mycological Progress 18: 1135–1154. 10.1007/s11557-019-01511-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Gossen BD, Morrall RAA. (1986) Transmission of Ascochyta lentis from infected lentil seed and plant residue. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 8: 28–32. 10.1080/07060668609501837 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Grishkan I. (2018) Spatio temporal variations in soil cultivable mycobiota at the Arava desert (Israel) along latitudinal and elevational gradients. AIMS Microbiology 4: 502–521. 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Groenewald M, Lombard L, de Vries M, Lopez AG, Smith M, Crous PW. (2018) Diversity of yeast species from Dutch garden soil and the description of six novel Ascomycetes Federation of European Microbiological Societies Yeast Research 18: foy076. 10.1093/femsyr/foy076 [DOI] [PubMed]
Jiang JR, Chen Q, Cai L. (2016) Polyphasic characterisation of three novel species of Paraboeremia. Mycological Progress 16: 285–295. 10.1007/s11557-016-1253-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2017) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinformatics: 1–7. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Li W, Wang MM, Wang XG, Cheng XL, Guo JJ, Bian XM, Cai L. (2016) Fungal communities in sediments of subtropical Chinese seas as estimated by DNA metabarcoding. Scientific Reports 6: 26528. 10.1038/srep26528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Marincowitz S, Barnes I, Bensch K, Braun U, Camporesi E, Damm U, de Beer ZW, Dissanayake A, Edwards J, Giraldo A, Hernandez-Restrepo M, Hyde KD, Jayawardena RS, Lombard L, Luangsa-Ard J, McTaggart AR, Rossman AY, Sandoval-Denis M, Shen M, Shivas RG, Tan YP, van der Linde EJ, Wingfield MJ, Wood AR, Zhang JQ, Zhang Y, Crous PW. (2017) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1. Studies in Mycology 86: 99–216. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Marin-Felix Y, Hernández-Restrepo M, Wingfield MJ, Akulov A, Carnegie AJ, Cheewangkoon R, Gramaje D, Groenewald JZ, Guarnaccia V, Halleen F, Lombard L, Luangsa-Ard J, Marincowitz S, Moslemi A, Mostert L, Quaedvlieg W, Schumacher RK, Spies CFJ, Thangavel R, Taylor PWJ, Wilson AM, Wingfield BD, Wood AR, Crous PW. (2019) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 2. Studies in Mycology 92: 43–133. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Maryani N, Lombard L, Poerba YS, Subandiyah S, Crous PW, Kema GHJ. (2019) Phylogeny and genetic diversity of the banana Fusarium wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in the Indonesian centre of origin. Studies in Mycology 92: 155–194. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Miao CP, Mi QL, Qiao XG, Zheng YK, Chen YW, Xu LH, Guan HL, Zhao LX. (2016) Rhizospheric fungi of Panax notoginseng: diversity and antagonism to host phytopathogens. Journal of Ginseng Research 40: 127–134. 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Morgan-Jones G, Burch KB. (1988) Studies in the genus Phoma. X. Concerning Phoma eupyrena, an ubiquitous, soil-borne species. Mycotaxon 31: 427–434. [Google Scholar]
Nagano Y, Miura T, Nishi S, Lima AO, Nakayama C, Pellizari VH, Fujikura K. (2017) Fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments associated with asphalt seeps at the Sao Paulo Plateau. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 146: 59–67. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.05.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Nallanchakravarthula S, Mahmood S, Alström S, Finlay RD. (2014) Influence of soil type, cultivar and Verticillium dahliae on the structure of the root and rhizosphere soil fungal microbiome of strawberry. PLoS ONE 9: e111455. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Nylander JAA. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Natvig DO, Lipinski K, Sinsabaugh RL. (2011) Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland. Mycologia 103: 10–21. 10.3852/09-297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Paterson RRM, Lima N. (2017) Filamentous fungal human pathogens from food emphasising Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucor Microorganisms 5: 44. 10.3390/microorganisms5030044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Rayner RW. (1970) A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British Mycological Society, Kew Publishing, 1–34.
Rambaut A. (2014) FigTree 1.4.2. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rudgers JA, Kivlin SN, Whitney KD, Price MV, Waser NM, Harte J. (2014) Responses of high-altitude graminoids and soil fungi to 20 years of experimental warming. Ecology 95: 1918–1928. 10.1890/13-1454.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ruisi S, Barreca D, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S. (2007) fungi in Antarctica. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 6: 127–141. 10.1007/s11157-006-9107-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N. (2010) Time and memory efficient likelihood-based tree searched on phylogenomic alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics 26: i132–i139. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Sung GH, Sung JM, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW. (2007) A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, fungi): identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1204–1223. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Swofford DL. (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Sydow H, Sydow P. (1915) Novae fungorum species. Annales Mycologici 13: 35–43. [Google Scholar]
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Koljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Ruiz LV, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Poldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Partel K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson KH, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, Guo LD, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, De Kesel A, Dang T, Chen X, Buegger F, Brearley FQ, Bonito G, Anslan S, Abell S, Abarenkov K. (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346: 125688. 10.1126/science.1256688 [DOI] [PubMed]
Tivoli B, Banniza S. (2007) Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights on grain legumes. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 59–76. 10.1007/s10658-007-9117-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Tivoli B, Baranger A, Muehlbauer FJ, Cooke BM. (2007b) Ascochyta blights of grain legumes. Springer Publishing, 1–141. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6065-6 [DOI]
Tullio V, Banche G, Allizond V, Roana J, Mandras N, Scalas D, Panzone M, Cervetti O, Valle S, Carlone N, Cuffini AM. (2010) Non-dermatophyte moulds as skin and nail foot mycosis agents: Phoma herbarum, Chaetomium globosum and Microascus cinereus. Fungal Biology 114: 345–349. 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vaghefi N, Pethybridge SJ, Hay FS, Ford R, Nicolas ME, Taylor PWJ. (2016) Revisiting Stagonosporopsis species associated with chrysanthemum and pyrethrum ray blight. Australasian Plant Pathology 45: 561–570. 10.1007/s13313-016-0446-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi‐gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27: 171–180. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Valenzuela-Lopez N, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Sutton DA, Wiederhold N, Crous PW, Stchigel AM. (2018) Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae. Studies in Mycology 90: 1–69. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
van Agtmaal M, Straathof A, Termorshuizen A, Teurlincx S, Hundscheid M, Ruyters S, Busschaert P, Lievens B, de Boer W. (2017) Exploring the reservoir of potential fungal plant pathogens in agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology 121: 152–160. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/JB.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vilgalys R, Sun BL. (1994) Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 4599–4603. 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Voøíšková J, Baldrian P. (2012) Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 7: 477–486. 10.1038/ismej.2012.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315–322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Spiers AG, Crous PW. (2009) Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia 22: 56–62. 10.3767/003158509X427808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yang Y, Dou Y, Huang YM, An SS. (2017) Links between soil fungal diversity and plant and soil properties on the Loess Plateau. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 2198. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Zhang T, Jia RL, Yu LY. (2016a) Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities associated with biological soil crusts in the southeaster Tengger Desert (China) as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Fungal Ecology 23: 156–163. 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.08.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhang XY, Wang GH, Xu XY, Nong XH, Wang J, Amin M, Qi SH. (2016b) Exploring fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments from Okinawa Trough using high-throughput Illumina sequencing. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 116: 99–105. 10.1016/j.dsr.2016.08.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Zhang ZF, Liu F, Zhou X, Liu XZ, Liu SJ, Cai L. (2017) Culturable mycobiota from Karst caves in China, with descriptions of 20 new species. Persoonia 39: 1–31. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Ascochyta benningiorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment1.xml^{(18.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Didymella degraaffiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment2.xml^{(14.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Didymella kooimaniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment3.xml^{(11.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment4.xml^{(14KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Nothophoma brennandiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment5.xml^{(16.4KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Paraboeremia rekkeri

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment6.xml^{(12.8KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Paraboeremia truiniorum

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment7.xml^{(13.7KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment8.xml^{(15.6KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Stagonosporopsis weymaniae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment9.xml^{(15.1KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment10.xml^{(3.4KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella joseae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment11.xml^{(12.5KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Vandijckomycella snoekiae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment12.xml^{(9.2KB, xml)}

XML Treatment for Xenodidymella weymaniae

mycokeys.65.47704-treatment13.xml^{(15.6KB, xml)}

[B1] Anderson JPE, Domsch KH. (1973) Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration. Archives of Microbiology 93: 113–127. 10.1007/BF00424942 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B2] Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Crous PW. (2008) Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fungal Diversity 31: 1–18. [Google Scholar]

[B3] Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Woudenberg JHC, Verkley GJM, Crous PW. (2010) Highlights of the Didymellaceae: a polyphasic approach to characterise Phoma and related pleosporalean genera. Studies in Mycology 65: 1–60. 10.3114/sim.2010.65.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B4] Aveskamp MM, Verkley GJM, de Gruyter J, Murace MA, Perelló A, Woudenberg JHC, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. (2009) DNA phylogeny reveals polyphyly of Phoma section Peyronellaea and multiple taxonomic novelties. Mycologia 101: 363–382. 10.3852/08-199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B5] Bakerspigel A, Lowe D, Rostas A. (1981) The isolation of Phoma eupyrena from a human lesion. Archives of Dermatology 117: 362–363. 10.1001/archderm.1981.01650060052024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B6] Bell TH, Hassan SED, Lauron-Moreau A, Al-Otaibi F, Hijri M, Yergeau E, St-Arnaud M. (2014) Linkage between bacterial and fungal rhizosphere communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils is related to plant phylogeny. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 8: 331. 10.1038/ismej.2013.149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B7] Bender SF, Plantenga F, Neftel A, Jocher M, Oberholzer HR, Kohl L, Giles M, Daniell TJ, van der Heijden MAG. (2013) Symbiotic relationships between soil fungi and plants reduce N₂O emissions from soil. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 8: 1336–1345. 10.1038/ismej.2013.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B8] Bennett A, Ponder MM, Garcia-Diaz J. (2018) Phoma infections: classification, potential food sources, and their clinical impact. Microorganisms 6: 58. 10.3390/microorganisms6030058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B9] Boerema GH. (1993) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – II. Section Peyronellaea. Persoonia 15: 197–221. [Google Scholar]

[B10] Boerema GH, de Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Hamers MEC. (2004) Phoma identification manual. Differentiation of specific and infra-specific taxa in culture. CABI Publishing, 1–467. 10.1079/9780851997438.0000 [DOI]

[B11] Botha A. (2011) The importance and ecology of yeasts in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43: 1–8. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B12] Braun U, Nakashima C, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Moreno-Rico O, Rooney-Latham S, Blomquist CL, Haas J, Marmolejo J. (2018) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Tubakia s. lat. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 1: 41–99. 10.3114/fuse.2018.01.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B13] Bridge P, Spooner B. (2001) Soil fungi: diversity and detection. Plant and Soil 232: 147–154. 10.1023/A:1010346305799 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B14] Chen Q, Hou LW, Duan WJ, Crous PW, Cai L. (2017) Didymellaceae revisited. Studies in Mycology 87: 105–159. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B15] Chen Q, Jiang JR, Zhang GZ, Cai L, Crous PW. (2015) Resolving the Phoma enigma. Studies in Mycology 82: 137–217. 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B16] Chen SY, Dickson DW, Kimbrough JW. (1996) Phoma heteroderae sp. nov. isolated from eggs of Heteroderae glycines. Mycologia 88: 885–891. 10.2307/3761050 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B17] Chethana KWT, Jayawardene RS, Zhang W, Zhou YY, Liu M, Hyde KD, Li XH, Wang J, Zhang KC, Yan JY. (2019) Molecular characterization and pathogenicity of fungal taxa associated with cherry leaf spot disease. Mycosphere 10: 490–530. 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B18] Corbaz R. (1955) Sur Didymella phacae Corbaz. Sydowia 9: 229–230. [Google Scholar]

[B19] Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Carnegie AJ, Hardy GEStJ, Smith D, Summerell BA, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Houbraken J, Lombard L, Martín MP, Sandoval-Denis M, Alexandrova AV, Barnes CW, Baseia IG, Bezerra JDP, Guarnaccia V, May TW, Hernández-Restrepo M, Stchigel AM, Miller AN, Ordoñez ME, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Agnello C, Agustin Colmán A, Albuquerque CC, Alfredo DS, Alvarado P, Araújo-Magalhães GR, Arauzo S, Atkinson Thomas, Barili A, Barreto RW, Bezerra JL, Cabral TS, Camello Rodríguez F, Cruz RHSF, Daniëls PP, da Silva BDB, de Almeida DAC, de Carvalho Júnior AA, Decock CA, Delgat L, Denman S, Dimitrov RA, Edwards J, Fedosova AG, Ferreira RJ, Firmino AL, Flores JA, Garcia D, Gené J, Giraldo A, Góis JS, Gomes AAM, Gonçalves CM, Gouliamova DE, Groenewald M, Guéorguiev BV, Guevara-Suarez M, Gusmao LFP, Hosaka K, Hubka V, Huhndorf SM, Jadan M, Jurjević Ž, Kraak B, Kučera V, Kumar TKA, Kušan I, Lacerda SR, Lamlertthon S, Lisboa WS, Loizides M, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lysková P, Mac Cormack WP, Macedo DM, Machado AR, Malysheva EF, Marinho P, Matočec N, Meijer M, Mešić A, Mongkolsamrit S, Moreira KA, Morozova OV, Nair KU, Nakamura N, Noisripoom W, Olariaga I, Oliveira RJV, Paiva LM, Pawar P, Pereira OL, Peterson SW, Prieto M, Rodríguez-Andrade E, Rojo De Blas C, Roy M, Santos ES, Sharma R, Silva GA, Souza-Motta CM, Takeuchi-Kaneko Y, Tanaka C, Thakur A, Smith MTH, Tkalčec Z, Valenzuela-Lopez N, van der Kleij P, Verbeken A, Viana MG, Wang XW, Groenewald JZ. (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 625–715. Persoonia 39: 270–467. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B20] Crous PW, Braun U, Hunter GC, Wingfield MJ, Verkley GJM, Shin HD, Nakashima C, Groenewald JZ. (2013) Phylogenetic lineages in Pseudocercospora. Studies in Mycology 75: 37–114. 10.3114/sim0005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B21] Crous PW, Verkleij GJM, Groenewald JZ, Houbraken J. (2019) Fungal Biodiversity. [Westerdijk Laboratory Manual Series No. 1] Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute publishing, Utrecht, Netherlands.

[B22] Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. (2004) MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21^st century. Studies in Mycology 50: 19–22. [Google Scholar]

[B23] Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ, Wingfield MJ, Carnegie AJ, Hernandez-Restrepo M, Lombard L, Roux J, Barreto RW, Baseia IG, Cano-Lira JF, Martin MP, Morozova OV, Stchigel AM, Summerell BA, Brandrud TE, Dima B, Garcia D, Giraldo A, Guarro J, Gusmao LFP, Khamsuntorn P, Noordeloos ME, Nuankaew S, Pinruan U, Rodriguez-Andrade E, Souza-Motta CM, Thangavel R, Iperen AL, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Alves JL, Andrade JP, Bahram M, Baral HO, Barbier E, Barnes CW, Bendiksen E, Bernard E, Bezerra JDP, Bezerra JL, Bizio E, Blair JE, Bulyonkova TM, Cabral TS, Caiafa MV, Cantillo T, Colman AA, Conceicao LB, Cruz S, Cunha AOB, Darveaux BA, Silva AL, da Silva GA, da Silva GM, da Silva RMF, de Oliveira RJV, Oliveira RL, De Souza JT, Duenas M, Evans HC, Epifani F, Felipe MTC, Fernandez-Lopez J, Ferreira BW, Figueiredo CN, Filippova NV, Flores JA, Gene J, Ghorbani G, Gibertoni TB, Glushakova AM, Healy R, Huhndorf SM, Iturrieta-Gonzalez I, Javan-Nikkhah M, Juciano RF, Jurjevic Z, Kachalkin AV, Keochanpheng K, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Li YC, Lima AA, Machado AR, Madrid H, Magalhaes OMC, Marbach PAS, Melanda GCS, Miller AN, Mongkolsamrit S, Nascimento RP, Oliveira TGL, Ordonez ME, Orzes R, Palma MA, Pearce CJ, Pereira OL, Perrone G, Peterson SW, Pham THG, Piontelli E, Pordel A, Quijada L, Raja HA, de Paz ER, Ryvarden L, Saitta A, Salcedo SS, Sandoval-Denis M, Santos TAB, Seifert KA, Silva BDB, Smith ME, Soares AM, Sommai S, Sousa JO, Suetrong S, Susca A, Tedersoo L, Telleria MT, Thanakitpipattana D, Valenzuela-Lopez N, Visagie CM, Zapata M, Groenewald JZ. (2018) Fungal planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 41: 238–417. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B24] Davidson JA, Kimber RBE. (2007) Integrated disease management of ascochyta blight in pulse crops. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 99–110. 10.1007/s10658-007-9132-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B25] De Gruyter J. (2002) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – IX Section Macrospora. Persoonia 18: 85–102. [Google Scholar]

[B26] De Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME. (1992) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – I. 1. Section Phoma: Taxa with very small conidia in vitro. Persoonia 15: 71–92. [Google Scholar]

[B27] De Gruyter J, Noordeloos ME, Boerema GH. (1993) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes) – I. 2. Section Phoma: Additional taxa with very small conidia and taxa with conidia up to 7 um long. Persoonia 15: 369–400. [Google Scholar]

[B28] Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH. (2007) Compendium of soil fungi, 2^nd edition. IHW, Eching, Germany.

[B29] Dorenbosch MM. (1970) Key to nine ubiquitous soil-borne Phoma-like fungi. Persoonia 6: 1–14. [Google Scholar]

[B30] Farr DF, Rossman AY. (2019) Fungal databases, systematic mycology and microbiology laboratory. ARS, USDA. http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/

[B31] Frąc M, Hannula SE, Bełka M, Jedryczka M. (2018) Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil health. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 707. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B32] Giraldo A, Hernández-Restrepo M, Crous PW. (2019) New plectosphaerellaceous species from Dutch garden soil. Mycological Progress 18: 1135–1154. 10.1007/s11557-019-01511-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B33] Gossen BD, Morrall RAA. (1986) Transmission of Ascochyta lentis from infected lentil seed and plant residue. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 8: 28–32. 10.1080/07060668609501837 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B34] Grishkan I. (2018) Spatio temporal variations in soil cultivable mycobiota at the Arava desert (Israel) along latitudinal and elevational gradients. AIMS Microbiology 4: 502–521. 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B35] Groenewald M, Lombard L, de Vries M, Lopez AG, Smith M, Crous PW. (2018) Diversity of yeast species from Dutch garden soil and the description of six novel Ascomycetes Federation of European Microbiological Societies Yeast Research 18: foy076. 10.1093/femsyr/foy076 [DOI] [PubMed]

[B36] Jiang JR, Chen Q, Cai L. (2016) Polyphasic characterisation of three novel species of Paraboeremia. Mycological Progress 16: 285–295. 10.1007/s11557-016-1253-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B37] Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2017) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinformatics: 1–7. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B38] Li W, Wang MM, Wang XG, Cheng XL, Guo JJ, Bian XM, Cai L. (2016) Fungal communities in sediments of subtropical Chinese seas as estimated by DNA metabarcoding. Scientific Reports 6: 26528. 10.1038/srep26528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B39] Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B40] Marin-Felix Y, Groenewald JZ, Cai L, Chen Q, Marincowitz S, Barnes I, Bensch K, Braun U, Camporesi E, Damm U, de Beer ZW, Dissanayake A, Edwards J, Giraldo A, Hernandez-Restrepo M, Hyde KD, Jayawardena RS, Lombard L, Luangsa-Ard J, McTaggart AR, Rossman AY, Sandoval-Denis M, Shen M, Shivas RG, Tan YP, van der Linde EJ, Wingfield MJ, Wood AR, Zhang JQ, Zhang Y, Crous PW. (2017) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 1. Studies in Mycology 86: 99–216. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B41] Marin-Felix Y, Hernández-Restrepo M, Wingfield MJ, Akulov A, Carnegie AJ, Cheewangkoon R, Gramaje D, Groenewald JZ, Guarnaccia V, Halleen F, Lombard L, Luangsa-Ard J, Marincowitz S, Moslemi A, Mostert L, Quaedvlieg W, Schumacher RK, Spies CFJ, Thangavel R, Taylor PWJ, Wilson AM, Wingfield BD, Wood AR, Crous PW. (2019) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 2. Studies in Mycology 92: 43–133. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B42] Maryani N, Lombard L, Poerba YS, Subandiyah S, Crous PW, Kema GHJ. (2019) Phylogeny and genetic diversity of the banana Fusarium wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in the Indonesian centre of origin. Studies in Mycology 92: 155–194. 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B43] Miao CP, Mi QL, Qiao XG, Zheng YK, Chen YW, Xu LH, Guan HL, Zhao LX. (2016) Rhizospheric fungi of Panax notoginseng: diversity and antagonism to host phytopathogens. Journal of Ginseng Research 40: 127–134. 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B44] Morgan-Jones G, Burch KB. (1988) Studies in the genus Phoma. X. Concerning Phoma eupyrena, an ubiquitous, soil-borne species. Mycotaxon 31: 427–434. [Google Scholar]

[B45] Nagano Y, Miura T, Nishi S, Lima AO, Nakayama C, Pellizari VH, Fujikura K. (2017) Fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments associated with asphalt seeps at the Sao Paulo Plateau. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 146: 59–67. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.05.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B46] Nallanchakravarthula S, Mahmood S, Alström S, Finlay RD. (2014) Influence of soil type, cultivar and Verticillium dahliae on the structure of the root and rhizosphere soil fungal microbiome of strawberry. PLoS ONE 9: e111455. 10.1371/journal.pone.0111455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B47] Nylander JAA. (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.

[B48] Porras-Alfaro A, Herrera J, Natvig DO, Lipinski K, Sinsabaugh RL. (2011) Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities in a semiarid grassland. Mycologia 103: 10–21. 10.3852/09-297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B49] Paterson RRM, Lima N. (2017) Filamentous fungal human pathogens from food emphasising Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucor Microorganisms 5: 44. 10.3390/microorganisms5030044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B50] Rayner RW. (1970) A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute and British Mycological Society, Kew Publishing, 1–34.

[B51] Rambaut A. (2014) FigTree 1.4.2. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree

[B52] Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B53] Rudgers JA, Kivlin SN, Whitney KD, Price MV, Waser NM, Harte J. (2014) Responses of high-altitude graminoids and soil fungi to 20 years of experimental warming. Ecology 95: 1918–1928. 10.1890/13-1454.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B54] Ruisi S, Barreca D, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S. (2007) fungi in Antarctica. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 6: 127–141. 10.1007/s11157-006-9107-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B55] Stamatakis A, Alachiotis N. (2010) Time and memory efficient likelihood-based tree searched on phylogenomic alignments with missing data. Bioinformatics 26: i132–i139. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B56] Sung GH, Sung JM, Hywel-Jones NL, Spatafora JW. (2007) A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, fungi): identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1204–1223. 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B57] Swofford DL. (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.

[B58] Sydow H, Sydow P. (1915) Novae fungorum species. Annales Mycologici 13: 35–43. [Google Scholar]

[B59] Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B60] Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Koljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Ruiz LV, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Poldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Partel K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson KH, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, Guo LD, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, De Kesel A, Dang T, Chen X, Buegger F, Brearley FQ, Bonito G, Anslan S, Abell S, Abarenkov K. (2014) Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346: 125688. 10.1126/science.1256688 [DOI] [PubMed]

[B61] Tivoli B, Banniza S. (2007) Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights on grain legumes. European Journal of Plant Pathology 119: 59–76. 10.1007/s10658-007-9117-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B62] Tivoli B, Baranger A, Muehlbauer FJ, Cooke BM. (2007b) Ascochyta blights of grain legumes. Springer Publishing, 1–141. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6065-6 [DOI]

[B63] Tullio V, Banche G, Allizond V, Roana J, Mandras N, Scalas D, Panzone M, Cervetti O, Valle S, Carlone N, Cuffini AM. (2010) Non-dermatophyte moulds as skin and nail foot mycosis agents: Phoma herbarum, Chaetomium globosum and Microascus cinereus. Fungal Biology 114: 345–349. 10.1016/j.funbio.2010.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B64] Vaghefi N, Pethybridge SJ, Hay FS, Ford R, Nicolas ME, Taylor PWJ. (2016) Revisiting Stagonosporopsis species associated with chrysanthemum and pyrethrum ray blight. Australasian Plant Pathology 45: 561–570. 10.1007/s13313-016-0446-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B65] Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi‐gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27: 171–180. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B66] Valenzuela-Lopez N, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Sutton DA, Wiederhold N, Crous PW, Stchigel AM. (2018) Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae. Studies in Mycology 90: 1–69. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B67] van Agtmaal M, Straathof A, Termorshuizen A, Teurlincx S, Hundscheid M, Ruyters S, Busschaert P, Lievens B, de Boer W. (2017) Exploring the reservoir of potential fungal plant pathogens in agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology 121: 152–160. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.09.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B68] Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/JB.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B69] Vilgalys R, Sun BL. (1994) Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 4599–4603. 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B70] Voøíšková J, Baldrian P. (2012) Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. The International Society for Microbial Ecology Journal 7: 477–486. 10.1038/ismej.2012.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B71] White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315–322. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]

[B72] Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, de Gruyter J, Spiers AG, Crous PW. (2009) Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia 22: 56–62. 10.3767/003158509X427808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B73] Yang Y, Dou Y, Huang YM, An SS. (2017) Links between soil fungal diversity and plant and soil properties on the Loess Plateau. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 2198. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[B74] Zhang T, Jia RL, Yu LY. (2016a) Diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities associated with biological soil crusts in the southeaster Tengger Desert (China) as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Fungal Ecology 23: 156–163. 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.08.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B75] Zhang XY, Wang GH, Xu XY, Nong XH, Wang J, Amin M, Qi SH. (2016b) Exploring fungal diversity in deep-sea sediments from Okinawa Trough using high-throughput Illumina sequencing. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 116: 99–105. 10.1016/j.dsr.2016.08.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[B76] Zhang ZF, Liu F, Zhou X, Liu XZ, Liu SJ, Cai L. (2017) Culturable mycobiota from Karst caves in China, with descriptions of 20 new species. Persoonia 39: 1–31. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Citizen science project reveals high diversity in Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes)

Lingwei Hou

Margarita Hernández-Restrepo

Johannes Zacharias Groenewald

Lei Cai

Pedro W Crous

Abstract Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Sampling and isolation

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Table 1.

Selection of Didymellaceae strains

Sequence alignment and molecular phylogenetic analysis

Morphological characterisation

Results

Phylogenetic identification

Figure 1.

Loci resolution

Taxonomy

Ascochyta benningiorum

Figure 2.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimens examined.

Notes.

Didymella degraaffiae

Figure 3.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Notes.

Didymella kooimaniorum

Figure 4.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Notes.

Juxtiphoma kolkmaniorum

Figure 5.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimens examined.

Notes.

Nothophoma brennandiae

Figure 6.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimen examined.

Notes.

Paraboeremia rekkeri

Figure 7.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimens examined.

Notes.

Paraboeremia truiniorum

Figure 8.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimens examined.

Notes.

Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii

Figure 9.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.

Additional specimens examined.

Notes.

Stagonosporopsis weymaniae

Figure 10.

Etymology.

Typus.

Culture characteristics.