Custodero et al. conclude that N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels during the acute phase of sepsis may be a useful indicator of higher risk of long-term impairments in physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors [1]. A letter from Jiarong et al. has challenged this assertion, pointing to the exponential increase in the plasma level of NT-proBNP with a declining glomerular filtration rate. As they have noted, it does not seem persuasive that NT-proBNP could completely predict outcomes without adjusting for the covariate of renal function. They suggest that the relationship of NT-proBNP levels during the acute phase of sepsis and physical function and muscle strength outcomes in sepsis survivors be stratified based on the renal function [2]. In keeping with this, we would like to comment further. Nearly half of critically ill patients, especially with septic shock, have or develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and 20–25% need renal replacement therapy (RRT) within the first week of their stay [3]. In the Custodero study, the two cohorts (chronic critical illness [CCI] and rapid recovery [RAP]) had a considerable difference in the incidence of septic shock (36.5% vs 16.4%), so it would stand to reason that the rate of AKI and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was much lower in the RAP cohort when compared to the CCI cohort [1]. CRRT is performed using membranes that have a cut-off value of 35–40 kDa and therefore some quantity of NT-proBNP will be eliminated [4]. Because of its low molecular weight (8.5 kDa), NT-proBNP is likely to be effectively cleared by both high- and low-flux membranes [4]. New highly adsorptive membranes (HAM) can adsorb many molecules with a molecular weight above 35 kDa and will increase this removal even further [4]. This could mislead patient prognostication by artificially decreasing NT-proBNP, but no studies have challenged this issue. Such studies should be done as there is already a long list of biomarkers in sepsis that are lacking reliability during CRRT [5]. As a consequence of the different rates of CRRT between the two cohorts, the reliability of NT-proBNP to be a useful indicator of long-term impairments in physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors might be questioned.
Authors’ response
Carlo Custodero; Quran Wu; Gabriela L. Ghita; Stephen D. Anton; Scott C. Brakenridge; Babette Brumback; Philip Efron; Anna K. Gardner; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Lyle L. Moldawer; John W. Petersen; Frederick A. Moore; Robert T. Mankowski
We highly appreciate the feedback from Honore et al. on our publication entitled “Prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels in the acute phase of sepsis on lower long-term physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors.”
We agree that impaired renal function is one of the factors contributing to high NT-proBNP levels in the acute phase of sepsis [6]; however, we addressed this comment in our previous response by showing that adding the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a covariate to our model did not change our findings. We agree that the chronic critical illness (CCI) patients had higher rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) and that the levels of NT-proBNP can be affected by therapies such as the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) [4]. However, in our cohort, only 12% of CCI and 0% of RAP patients had CRRT within 48 h from sepsis onset.
Our primary purpose of showing this predictive association was to continue this line of research to further understand the biology of high NT-proBNP levels in acute phase of sepsis and as a novel approach to potentially identify sepsis patients at high risk for functional decline. Therefore, we agree with the authors that other factors such as CRRT in artificially decreasing the NT-proBNP levels should be taken into consideration in our future investigations to further explore the biological factors that may underlie high NT-proBNP levels in the acute sepsis patient population.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Melissa Jackson for critical review of the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- NT-proBNP
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide
- CCI
Chronic critical illness
- RAP
Rapid recovery
- ICU
Intensive care unit
- AKI
Acute kidney injury
- RRT
Renal replacement therapy
- CRRT
Continuous renal replacement therapy
- HAM
Highly adsorptive membranes
Authors’ contributions
PMH, SR, and DDB designed the paper. All authors participated in drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):230. 10.1186/s13054-019-2505-7.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Patrick M. Honore, Email: Patrick.Honore@CHU-Brugmann.be
Cristina David, Email: Cristina.David@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Aude Mugisha, Email: Aude.Mugisha@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Rachid Attou, Email: Rachid.Attou@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Sebastien Redant, Email: Sebastien.Redant@CHU-Brugmann.be.
Andrea Gallerani, Email: Andrea.Gallerani@CHU-Brugmann.be.
David De Bels, Email: David.DeBels@CHU-Brugmann.be.
References
- 1.Custodero C, Wu Q, Ghita GL, Anton SD, Brakenridge SC, Brumback BA, et al. Prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels in the acute phase of sepsis on lower long-term physical function and muscle strength in sepsis survivors. Crit Care. 2019;23:230. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2505-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ye J, Liang Q, Xi X. NT-proBNP levels might predict outcomes in severe sepsis, but renal function cannot be ignored. Crit Care. 2019;23:341. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2615-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peters E, Antonelli M, Wittebole X, Nanchal R, François B, Sakr Y, et al. A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from the intensive care over nations audit. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2112-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Honoré PM, De Bels D, Spapen HD. An update on membranes and cartridges for extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24(6):463–468. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Honoré PM, Jacobs R, De Waele E, Van Gorp V, Spapen HD. Evaluating sepsis during continuous dialysis: are biomarkers still valid? Blood Purif. 2014;38(2):104–105. doi: 10.1159/000363497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haines R, Crichton S, Wilson J, Treacher D, Ostermann M. Cardiac biomarkers are associated with maximum stage of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a prospective analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1674-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
