Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2007 Mar 27;50(4):449–453. [Article in German] doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0190-1

Haben HIV-Positive eine besondere Verantwortung?

Is there a special responsibility of HIV-positive people? A discussion paper

Roger Staub 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7079983  PMID: 17385100

Abstract

In the 1980s, most Western countries decided to opt for a new public health approach based on learning strategies to fight HIV/AIDS. Within the new public health paradigm, every sexually active person protects him-/herself, whereas it is the infected people that bear the burden of prevention according to old public health. The paper begins with a clear statement for the new public health approach that includes self-protection and the protection of civil rights. It argues that this approach is still valid under the changing circumstances due to combination therapies and the developments related to them, such as the introduction of routine HIV screening in some countries. On this background, the paper examines from an ethical perspective to what extent people with HIV have a responsibility in HIV prevention. The paper argues that a person with HIV has a responsibility to protect his/her partner in the case of a relationship of love. On the other hand, in the case of "purely" sexual encounters, each person is responsible for his/her own security and should not rely on the other. This position also helps to clarify prevention messages. In conclusion, the paper shows how morality evolves into ethical positions and then translates into the law. It finally claims for stronger obligations for sex businesses to support HIV prevention.

Keywords: HIV, Responsibility, Control and containment, Inclusion and cooperation, Prevention

Literatur

  • 1.Rosenbrock R (2002) Aidspolitik, Gesundheitspolitik und Schwulenpolitik. In: Rosenbrock R, Schaeffer D (Hrsg) Die Normalisierung von Aids. Politik – Prävention – Krankenversorgung. edition sigma, Berlin, S 111–127
  • 2.Dubois-Arber F, Haour-Knipe M (1998) Identification des discriminations institutionnelles à l‘encontre des personnes vivant avec le VIH en Suisse. Raisons de santé 18. IUMSP/UEPP, Lausanne
  • 3.Pärli K, Müller Kucera K, Spycher S (2003) Aids, Recht und Geld. Eine Untersuchung der rechtlichen und wirtschaftlichen Probleme von Menschen mit HIV/Aids. Verlag Rüegger, Zürich
  • 4.Bundesamt für Gesundheit (2003) Nationales HIV/ Aids-Programm 2004-2008. Download: http://www. bag.admin.ch/hiv_aids/00824/index.html?lang=de. Bundesamt für Gesundheit, Bern
  • 5.Bundesamt Bull Bundesamtes Gesundheit. 2006;44:873. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Staub R (2003) HIV-positiv: Fertig mit Sex? Oder: Erwächst HIV-positiven Menschen eine andere oder besondere moralische Verantwortung? Diplomarbeit im Rahmen des Master-Studienganges 2001– 2003 Master of Advanced Studies in Applied Ethics (MAE). download: http://www.ethik.unizh.ch/mae/ home/diplomarbeiten.html. Universität Zürich, Ethik Zentrum, Zürich
  • 7.Trechsel S (1997) Schweizerisches Strafgesetzbuch vom 21. Dezember 1937. (Kurzkommentar). (2. Auflage). Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, Zürich

Articles from Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES