Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2019 Oct 21;125(1):145–155. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz166

A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposition among coexisting fern species in a sub-tropical forest

Dunmei Lin 1,, Shufang Yang 1, Pengpeng Dou 1, Hongjuan Wang 2, Fang Wang 1, Shenhua Qian 1, Guangrong Yang 1, Liang Zhao 1, Yongchuan Yang 1, Nicolas Fanin 3
PMCID: PMC7080221  PMID: 31633171

Abstract

Background and Aims

The plant economics spectrum theory provides a useful framework to examine plant strategies by integrating the co-ordination of plant functional traits along a resource acquisition–conservation trade-off axis. Empirical evidence for this theory has been widely observed for seed plants (Spermatophyta). However, whether this theory can be applied to ferns (Pteridophyta), a ubiquitous and ancient group of vascular plants, has rarely been evaluated so far.

Methods

We measured 11 pairs of plant functional traits on leaves and fine roots (diameter <2 mm) on 12 coexisting fern species in a sub-tropical forest. Litterbags of leaves and roots were placed in situ and exposed for 586 d to measure decomposition rates. The variation of traits across species and the co-ordination among traits within and between plant organs were analysed. Finally, the influence of the traits on decomposition rates were explored.

Key Results

Most leaf and root traits displayed high cross-species variation, and were aligned along a major resource acquisition–conservation trade-off axis. Many fern traits co-varied between leaves and fine roots, suggesting co-ordinated responses between above- and below-ground organs. Decomposition rates of leaves were significantly higher than those of fine roots, but they were significantly and positively correlated. Finally, our results highlight that the decomposition of both leaves and roots was relatively well predicted by the leaf and root economics spectra.

Conclusions

Our results support the existence of an acquisition–conservation trade-off axis within ferns and indicate that traits have important ‘afterlife’ effects on fern litter decomposition. We conclude that the plant economics spectrum theory that is commonly observed across seed plants can be applied to ferns species, thereby extending the generality of this theory to this ancient plant lineage in our study site. Our study further suggests that the evolutionary and ecological basis for the relationships among key economics traits appears to be similar between ferns and seed plants. Future studies involving larger data sets will be required to confirm these findings across different biomes at larger spatial scales.

Keywords: Above-ground–below-ground, plant functional traits, ecological strategy, plant economics spectrum, litter decomposition, ferns, plant–soil interactions

Introduction

Functional traits are measurable plant characteristics that are shaped by long-term adaptation of plants to a wide range of biotic and abiotic factors (Violle et al., 2007). Across large spatial scales or environmental gradients, plants generally vary widely in morphological and physiological traits as a response to different environmental conditions (Dolph and Dilcher, 1980; Reich et al., 1999; Wright et al., 2004, 2005; Liu et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2013; Roumet et al., 2016), but plant traits can also vary substantially at the local scale or within the plant community (Ricklefs and Matthew, 1982; Wright et al., 2004; Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Hättenschwiler et al., 2008; Comas and Eissenstat, 2009; Liu et al., 2010). Furthermore, plant traits generally do not vary independently, but show broad co-variation patterns among different traits (Reich et al., 1999; Craine et al., 2001; Díaz et al., 2004; Wright et al., 2004, 2007; Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Osnas et al., 2013; Prieto et al., 2015; Roumet et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2016, 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). For instance, the ‘leaf economics spectrum’ describes a suite of leaf traits that consistently co-vary along a single major axis and represents a resource acquisition–conservation trade-off (Reich et al., 1999, 2014; Wright et al., 2004, 2005, 2007; Freschet et al., 2010; Bakker et al., 2011). Species at the resource-acquisitive end of the spectrum tend to exhibit high photosynthesis rates, specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf nutrient concentrations, while species at the resource-conservative end of the spectrum tend to exhibit high lignin concentrations, dry matter contents (DMCs) or a high carbon (C) to nitrogen (N) ratio (Wright et al., 2004; Freschet et al., 2010). For below-ground traits, recent studies have demonstrated that roots are subject to a resource economics spectrum similar to that described for leaves (Reich, 2014; Prieto et al., 2015; Roumet et al., 2016). Acquisitive plant species have higher specific root lengths (SRLs), N concentration and root respiration rates, while conservative plant species tend to exhibit higher root DMCs, C and lignin concentrations and lignin:N ratio (Roumet et al., 2016; Prieto et al., 2015).

Despite the increasing necessity to assess whether and how plant traits and ecological processes are co-ordinated between above- and below-ground organs, leaf and root trait spectra have commonly been studied separately from each other (e.g. Wright et al., 2004; Bakker et al., 2011; Prieto et al., 2015; Roumet et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2019; but see Freschet et al., 2010; Perez-Ramos et al., 2012; Reich, 2014; de la Riva et al., 2016). Leaf and root traits are theoretically thought to be functionally co-ordinated to maximize the efficiency of acquiring and using limited resources (Reich, 2014). Yet, mixed results have been reported in the literature. For instance, SLA and its below-ground counterpart SRL have been found to be either positively correlated (Newman and Hart, 2006; Freschet et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2010), uncorrelated (Tjoelker et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2013; Kramer-Walter et al., 2016; Bergmann et al., 2017 ) or negatively correlated (Cheng et al., 2016). Furthermore, many studies have reported that the variation in root traits was multi-dimensional rather than one-dimensional, as reported for leaf traits (Kong et al., 2014, 2019; Kramer-Walter et al., 2016; Weemstra et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018). Therefore, the generality and the extent to which the co-variation patters of economics traits can be extended to the whole-plant level still require additional studies.

Decomposition of plant tissues is an essential process in the biogeochemical cycles of C and nutrients (Garnier et al., 2004; Bakker et al., 2011; Zuo et al., 2018). Most of the chemical and morphological traits of living plant tissues such as leaves persist upon death, and determine the quality of the litter produced (Santiago, 2007; Bakker et al., 2011; Zukswert and Prescott, 2017). Therefore, chemical and morphological plant functional traits have commonly been used as good predictors of litter decomposition rates (Cornelissen and Thompson, 1997; Santiago, 2007; Cornwell et al., 2008; Bakker et al., 2011). For example, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated positive correlations between leaf decomposition rate and both leaf nutrient concentrations and SLA, or negative correlations with leaf DMC, lignin concentration and C:N ratio (Cornelissen and Thompson, 1997; Santiago, 2007; Cornwell et al., 2008; Bakker et al., 2011; Freschet et al., 2012; de la Riva et al., 2019). Furthermore, the trait syndromes from the leaf and root economics spectra are also commonly used as good indicators of litter decomposability (e.g. Bakker et al., 2011; Freschet et al., 2012; Reich, 2014; Roumet et al., 2016; Zuo et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2019; de la Riva et al., 2019). Species in the acquisitive side of the spectrum are generally associated with more rapid litter decomposition rates, while species associated with conservative strategies generally produce recalcitrant litters that are relatively hard to break down (Bakker et al., 2011; Freschet et al., 2012; Roumet et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2019). These results suggest that species’ ecological strategies, indicated by the trait syndromes, may be useful to predict how changes in the plant community may alter ecosystem C storage and nutrient cycling (Santiago, 2007; Bakker et al., 2011; Freschet et al., 2012; Zuo et al., 2018).

Ferns (Pteridophyta) are worldwide distributed vascular plants with >10 000 species (Page, 1979; Smith et al., 2006; Kessler, 2010), and contribute significantly to ecosystem C and nutrient cycling (Marsh et al., 2000; Richardson and Walker, 2010; Lyu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019). Ferns represent a distinct path in the evolution of vascular plants (Smith et al., 2006) and, in comparison with seed plants (Spermatophyta), they are ecologically characterized by low vascular tissue development, leaf hydraulic conductance, photosynthesis capacity and nutrient concentrations (Brodribb et al., 2005; Han et al., 2005; Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Sharpe et al., 2010; Carriqui et al., 2015; Tosens et al., 2016). For example, maximum photosynthesis rates per unit area measured on a variety of fern species are mostly below 10 μmol CO2 m–2 s–1 (Hollinger, 1987; Sessa and Givnish, 2014; Carriqui et al., 2015; Tosens et al., 2016), which is twice as low as the values (9.4–32.0 μmol CO2 m–2 s–1) found in seed plants (Wright et al., 2004; Carriqui et al., 2015). Similarly, Han et al. (2005) reported significantly lower leaf N (12.4 vs. 18.9 mg g–1) and phosphorus (P; 0.81 vs. 1.22 mg g–1) concentrations in ferns than in seed plants among 753 plant species. Despite these profound variations in trait values, trait co-variation patterns of ferns are generally consistent with those reported for seed plants (Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Sessa and Givnish, 2014; Tosens et al., 2016). For instance, area-based leaf N concentration is positively correlated with both leaf mass per unit area and maximum photosynthetic rate per unit area among 20 understorey fern species in a temperate deciduous forest (Karst and Lechowicz, 2007), and SLA is positively correlated with maximum photosynthetic rate per unit area among 11 eastern North American ferns of genus Dryopteris (Sessa and Givnish, 2014). These results suggest that relationships among the key economic traits may have been conserved throughout the evolution of vascular plants (Reich et al., 2003). However, ferns are still relatively poorly represented in the current framework of resource economics spectrum theory. Indeed, in a meta-analysis describing the universal spectrum of leaf economics at the global scale, Wright et al. (2004) included 2021 vascular plant species, but only 13 fern species. Furthermore, only three fern species were included in the study assessing the existence of a ‘whole-plant economics spectrum’ across a wide range of sub-arctic plants (Freschet et al., 2010). Therefore, the generality of the resource economic spectrum for fern species remains to be proven, and additional studies are necessary to assess whether trait variation within ferns is an important driver of key ecological processes such as decomposition rates.

In this study, we measured leaf and root functional traits and decomposition rates of 12 understorey coexisting fern species in a sub-tropical forest in China. Our main objective was to extract major dimensions of leaf and root trait variation, investigate how these major trait dimensions were related to each other and assess whether they were good predictors of litter decomposition. Because the conditions of light, nutrient availability and water vary strongly at the hectare scale in our study site (Yang et al., 2001; Sun et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2019), we hypothesized that the variation in leaf and root traits of fern species should represent different resource use strategies along a major resource acquisition–conservation trade-off axis (Fig. 1). This is because fern species are thought to be relatively well adapted to a wide range of biotic and abiotic conditions (Page, 1979), and may present a wide range of variation in their functional traits to cope with various environmental conditions (e.g. Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Richardson and Walker, 2010; Sessa and Givnish, 2014). We also examined whether fern species with trait syndromes reflecting an acquisitive resource strategy would decompose faster than those with trait syndromes reflecting a conservative resource strategy. Specifically, we expected that species at the acquisitive end of the spectrum present high leaf and root nutrient concentrations, high SLA and SRL, and exhibit higher litter decomposition rates, whereas species at the conservative end of the spectrum are characterized by low nutrient concentrations, high DMC and lignin concentration, and exhibit low litter decomposition rate (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram depicting the hypothetical leaf economics spectrum and root economics spectrum and their afterlife effects on litter decomposition within ferns. The variations in some key economic traits across the ecological axis of trade-off between acquisition and conservation are given. SLA, specific leaf area; SRL, specific root length; DMC, dry matter content; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site and species selection

Fieldwork was conducted in Jinyunshan National Nature Reserve (29°48'25''–29°51'53''N, 106°20'18''–106°24'42''E) in Chongqing, South-west China. This area is characterized by a sub-tropical monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature of 13.6 °C and a mean annual precipitation of 1600 mm. The main vegetation in the reserve is an evergreen broad-leafed forest dominated by Castanopsis fargesii and Machilus pingii. Vegetation also includes plantations of Pinus massoniana, Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phyllostachys pubescens. Ferns are a major component of the understorey plant layer. For this study, we selected 12 common understorey fern species belonging to ten genera, namely Diplazium hachijoense, Diplazium dilatatum, Dryopteris labordei, Dryopteris erythrosora, Athyrium delavayi, Woodwardia japonica, Pronephrium penangianum, Metathelypteris laxa, Odontosoria chinensis, Arachniodes chinensis, Osmunda japonica and Diplopterygium chinense.

Leaf and root functional trait measurements

We focused on leaf and fine root (<2 mm in diameter) traits representative of the conservation–acquisition trade-off that was commonly used in previous studies (e.g. Freschet et al., 2012; de la Riva et al., 2018). Leaves or roots with obvious signs of damage (e.g. herbivory, galls and fungal attacks) were excluded. Morphological functional traits measured in this study included SLA, SRL and DMC. Chemical functional traits included C, N, P, cellulose and lignin concentrations, and pH (as proxy for cation contents; Cornelissen et al., 2006). Element stoichiometry, i.e. C:N, C:P and N:P ratios, were calculated based on the C, N and P value for leaves and roots, respectively. All traits were measured on three independent samples per organ per species, and the mean of these three measurements was used in the data analysis.

Fresh leaf mass was measured within 1 h after harvest (sporangia were brushed off beforehand). Leaves were then scanned at 400 dpi using an Epson perfection V300 photo scanner. The images were processed using the ImageJ software to determine leaf area (Schneider et al., 2012). After scanning, leaves were dried at 65 °C for 48 h and then weighed to determine their dry mass. Leaf DMC was calculated as the ratio of leaf dry mass to leaf fresh mass, and SLA was calculated as fresh leaf area divided by leaf dry mass. For root physical traits, full root systems were sealed in plastic bags and brought to the laboratory within 2 h after their harvest in the field. Roots were carefully washed under tap water. Fine roots with intact root branches were selected for the measurements of root traits. Root samples were soaked in distilled water, spread out to avoid any overlap and scanned at a resolution of 400 dpi using an Epson perfection V800 photo scanner equipped with a transmitted light source to avoid shadows. The resulting images were processed using the WinRHIZO software (Regent Instrument, Quebec, Canada) to determine total root length. After scanning, roots were removed from the distilled water, sponged carefully to remove all excess water and weighed to determine root fresh mass. Roots were then oven dried at 65 °C for 48 h and weighed to determine root dry mass. Root DMC was calculated as the ratio between root dry mass and root fresh mass, and SRL was calculated as the ratio between root length and root dry mass.

For the chemical analyses, dried leaf and root samples were ground into fine powder using a ball mill. The C concentration was measured by dry combustion using a solid module (Shimadzu SSM-5000, Japan) coupled with a TOC/TN analyser (Shimadzu TOC-L CPH, TNM-1, Japan). After digestion with concentrated H2SO4 and 30 % H2O2 (Jones, 2001), the N concentration was measured by using the TOC/TN analyser, and P concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by using the Mo–Sb colorimetric method. Cellulose and lignin concentrations were measured following the method as described in Graça et al. (2005). Following the method of Freschet et al. (2010), we shook leaf or root powder with deionized water for 1 h, and the pH of the suspension after centrifugation was measured using a pH meter.

Decomposition rates

We used the litterbag technique to quantify decomposition rates of fern leaves and roots. Because it is difficult to accurately determine the timing of death of fine roots in soil, we chose to use fresh materials for roots and leaves to measure decomposition rates according to Fujii et al. (2018). Leaves and roots from 20–50 well-developed mature individuals of each fern species were collected during October to November 2016. For each individual, we collected leaves manually and dug out roots to a depth of about 15 cm. Roots were then cleaned carefully under tap water to remove attached soil particles.

A 3 g aliquot of leaf and a 2 g aliquot of fine root were enclosed in 10 × 15 cm litterbags made from 25 μm mesh nylon netting. Litterbags were then placed in three forest sites distributed at a distance of 200–300 m. In total, 576 litterbags [12 species × 2 litter types (leaf or root) × 3 forest sites × 2 replicates each site × 4 harvests] were used in this study. On 25 January 2017, leaf litterbags were anchored onto the forest floor with plastic pins (natural litter was removed prior to litterbag placement). Root litterbags were buried below the soil surface to a depth of 5–10 cm. Two replicates (randomly chosen) per litter type per species were collected from each site at four sampling dates: 1 May 2017 (113 d), 24 July 2017 (198 d), 26 January 2018 (386 d) and 12 August 2018 (586 d). The remaining leaf and fine root litter was dried at 65 °C for 48 h and weighed.

Litter mass loss (%) was calculated as (MiMf)/Mi × 100, where Mi and Mf are initial and final litter dry mass, respectively. The decay constants (k values in units of year–1) were calculated by fitting the first-order exponential decay function (Olson, 1963):

Mt=M0ekt

where M0 is the proportion of initial litter mass remaining at time 0 (constrained as 100 here) and Mt is the proportion of remaining litter mass at a certain time t, e is the base of the natural logarithm and k is the decay constant. For each litter sample, the k value was first calculated by using the data from each incubation site separately, and then averaged across the three sites. Finally, the half-life of decomposing material (T1/2, years), i.e. the time needed to reach 50 % mass loss of each litter, was calculated as ln (0.5)/k (Gosz et al., 1973; Freschet et al., 2012). Higher T1/2 values correspond to slower decomposition rates, and vice versa.

Statistical analysis

Variation in the value of each trait was quantified by the coefficient of variation (CV). To assess whether functional traits were co-ordinated within organs, a principal components analysis (PCA) was carried out for traits of leaf and root, respectively. Due to the high proportion of variation explained by the first PCA axis, we used the species scores of the first PCA axis of each of the leaf and root PCAs as the proxy for the leaf and root economics spectrum. To test the co-ordination between above- and below-ground organs, bivariate relationships between leaves and roots in matching pairs of traits, economic spectra and decomposition rates were evaluated using standardized major axis (SMA) regressions (Warton et al., 2012). Significant differences in decomposition rates between leaves and roots were tested using a linear mixed-effects model, with organ as fixed effect and species as random effect. Finally, simple linear regressions were used to test the influence of individual functional traits or the economics spectra (predictor variables) on the decomposition rates (T1/2) of leaves and roots (response variables). To meet the assumption of normality, SLA, SRL and root T1/2 were ln-transformed prior to data analysis. All statistical analyses were performed on the R Software version 3.4.1 (R Core Team, 2017) with the ‘vegan’, ‘smatr’ and ‘lme4’ R packages for the PCA, SMA and linear mixed-effects model, respectively.

RESULTS

Interspecific variation in traits

Many fern traits exhibited large cross-species variation among the 12 coexisting species (Table 1; Supplementary data Table S1). For the morphological traits, SRL had higher cross-species variation (CV = 65.6 %) than the analogous leaf trait SLA (CV = 40.5 %); DMC of leaf and root (CV <31.0 %) showed less variation than SRL and SLA (Table 1). For chemical traits, pH of leaf and root showed low variation (CV <9.0 %). Similarly both leaf and root C had very low variation (CV < 5.0%), whereas N and P showed much higher variation (CV = 12.0–45.4 %) than C, leading to a high variation in all C:N:P ratios (CV >34.0 %). The variation of leaf and root cellulose (CV approx. 20 %) was lower than the variation of lignin (CV >42.0 %) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of leaf and fine root traits of the 12 fern species measured in this study

Trait (unit) Leaf Fine root
Mean Min Max CV (%) Mean Min Max CV (%)
SLA (cm2 g–1) 305.33 164.44 632.48 40.5
SRL (cm g–1) 232.45 77.26 622.01 65.6
DMC (mg g–1) 286.15 122.52 402.27 27.0 324.76 156.88 522.33 30.8
pH 5.88 5.17 6.33 5.6 5.14 4.57 5.87 8.4
C (mg g–1) 409.77 363.19 432.38 4.7 408.85 375.78 436.86 4.5
N (mg g–1) 19.64 16.03 23.54 12.0 9.5 5.11 14.93 32.8
P (mg g–1) 1.78 0.86 2.81 37.3 0.96 0.47 1.84 45.4
C:N 24.29 16.85 58.34 45.4 47.71 25.19 81.24 34.3
C:P 265.18 144.42 493.25 40.2 516.81 217.59 927.19 46.0
N:P 12.33 7.62 23.38 35.3 11.64 3.45 23.42 50.1
Cellulose (mg g–1) 267.63 149.95 362.47 19.2 292.55 193.48 362.25 21.0
Lignin (mg g–1) 69.75 16.70 143.44 57.5 224.48 92.50 353.70 42.3

The mean, minimum (Min), maximum (Max) values and coefficient of variation (CV) are given for each trait. Leaf and fine root trait values for each species can be found in Supplementary data Table S1.

SLA, specific leaf area; SRL, specific root length; DMC, dry matter content; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.

Co-variation of traits within and across organs

The first three PCA axes accounted for 74.54 % of the overall variation in leaf traits, with the first PCA axis accounting for 47.91 % (Fig. 2A; Supplementary data Table S2). All leaf traits, except pH, cellulose and lignin concentrations, contributed substantially to the first PCA axis, as indicated by the high individual loadings (Fig. 2A; Supplementary data Table S2). Leaf lignin concentration contributed strongly to the second PCA axis, while leaf cellulose concentration contributed strongly to the third PCA axis (Fig. 2A; Supplementary data Table S2). For root traits, the first three PCA axes accounted for 82.97 % of the overall variation (Supplementary data Table S2). Root DMC, pH, C, P, cellulose concentrations and C:P ratio contributed substantially to the first PCA axis which accounted for 46.45 % of the overall variation (Fig. 2B; Supplementary data Table S2). Root N, C:N and N:P contributed substantially to the second PCA axis, while SRL contributed strongly to the third PCA axis (Supplementary data Table S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Biplots of principal component analysis (PCA) on leaf (A) and root (B) functional traits. Points represent the 12 different fern species. SLA, specific leaf area; SRL, specific root length; DMC, dry matter content; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.

Bivariate relationships revealed significant correlations between several trait pairs between leaves and roots (i.e. DMC, C, P and lignin concentrations, C:P and N:P ratios), but SLA and SRL, pH, N and cellulose concentrations and C:N ratio were not significantly correlated between leaves and roots (Table 2). Finally, the first PCA axes scores between leaves and roots were significantly and positively correlated (SMA regression: r2 = 0.78, P < 0.001; Fig. 3A).

Table 2.

Bivariate relationships between matching pairs of leaf and root functional traits

Leaf and root trait pairs β r 2 P-value
SLASRL 0.52 0.10 0.054
DMC 0.75 0.41 <0.001
pH 0.66 0.08 0.105
C 1.14 0.44 <0.001
N 0.98 0.03 0.312
P 1.51 0.55 <0.001
C:N 0.21 0.05 0.185
C:P 0.42 0.73 <0.001
N:P 0.62 0.26 0.001
Cellulose 0.59 0.06 0.140
Lignin 0.41 0.14 0.026

Relationships were tested using standardized major axis (SMA) regression. SLA and SRL were ln-transformed. Significant relationships are shown in bold (P < 0.05).

SLA, specific leaf area; SRL, specific root length; DMC, dry matter content; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Correlation between the first axes derived from PCA on leaf and root traits (A) and between decomposition half-lives (T1/2) of fern leaves and roots (B). Regression lines were fitted using standardized major axis (SMA) regression. Root T1/2 was ln-transformed.

Decomposition rates of leaves and roots

After 586 d of decomposition, litter mass loss ranged from 10.5 to 73.1 %. First-order exponential decay curves for the entire decomposition experiment (0–586 d) fitted the decomposition data well (mean r2 = 0.91; Supplementary data Table S3). The decay rates (k value) of fern leaves ranged from 0.984 year–1 for P. penangianum to 0.369 year–1 for D. chinense, which corresponds to a leaf T1/2 of 0.70–1.88 years, respectively (Supplementary data Table S3). Fern roots decomposed significantly more slowly than leaves (mean k values = 0.667 ± 0.052 and 0.305 ± 0.060 year–1 for leaves and roots, respectively; P < 0.001), with decay rates ranging from 0.585 year–1 for M. laxa to 0.058 year–1 for A. chinensis, corresponding to a root T1/2 of 1.19–12.03 years (Supplementary data Table S3). When considering all fern species, T1/2 values of leaves and roots were significantly and positively correlated (SMA regression: r2 = 0.35, P = 0.047; Fig. 3B).

Individual trait and trait syndrome as predictors of decomposition rates

Leaf T1/2 increased with a decreasing C:P and N:P ratio; these ratios explained 50 % (P = 0.01) and 56 % (P = 0.005) of the variation in leaf T1/2, respectively (Table 3). Surprisingly, leaf T1/2 was not significantly correlated with any of the structure-related traits such as lignin or cellulose concentrations in leaves (Table 3). In contrast, root T1/2 was predicted well by root lignin or cellulose concentrations. In particular, root lignin concentration was the most important trait affecting root decomposition, explaining 90 % (P < 0.001) of the variation in root T1/2 (Table 3). Root T1/2 was also significantly related to root C concentration, C:P ratio and pH, each parameter explaining around 50 % of the variation in root T1/2 (Table 3). Overall, fern roots with low C, lignin and cellulose concentrations and a low C:P ratio tended to decompose faster, while roots with a low pH value tended to decompose more slowly (Table 3). The first PCA axis scores of leaves (representing the leaf economics spectrum) was a significant predictor of root T1/2 (r2 = 0.37, P = 0.036) but not leaf T1/2 (r2 = 0.25, P = 0.098), while the first PCA axis scores of roots (representing the root economics spectrum) was a significant predictor of both leaf T1/2 (r2 = 0.40, P = 0.027) and root T1/2 (r2 = 0.74, P < 0.001) (Fig. 4).

Table 3.

Results of the single linear regression analyses with species’ traits as predictor variables for interspecific variation in decomposition rates (decomposition half-life; T1/2) of each fern organ

Leaf traits Leaf T1/2 (years) Root T1/2 (years)
β r 2 P-value Root traits β r 2 P-value
SLA –0.0005 0.04 0.527 SRL –0.0012 0.05 0.503
DMC 0.0011 0.07 0.400 DMC 0.0039 0.21 0.131
C 0.0053 0.10 0.328 C 0.0335 0.52 0.008
N –0.0208 0.03 0.583 N –0.0915 0.11 0.285
P –0.2639 0.29 0.070 P –1.1128 0.33 0.051
C:N 0.0243 0.06 0.448 C:N 0.0181 0.12 0.267
C:P 0.0022 0.50 0.010 C:P 0.0025 0.47 0.013
N:P 0.0573 0.56 0.005 N:P 0.0534 0.14 0.239
pH –0.2035 0.04 0.521 pH –1.3866 0.50 0.010
Cellulose 0.0027 0.18 0.172 Cellulose 0.0114 0.68 0.001
Lignin 0.0017 0.04 0.514 Lignin 0.0085 0.90 <0.001

Root T1/2 was ln-transformed. Significant relationships are shown in bold (P < 0.05).

SLA, specific leaf area; SRL, specific root length; DMC, dry matter content; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Influences of the principal component analyses (PCA) first axis score representing the economics spectrum on decomposition half-lives (T1/2) of fern leaves and roots. Root T1/2 was ln-transformed.

Discussion

Trait variation and co-variation among coexisting ferns

In line with the high interspecific trait variation within a community reported previously in seed plants (Ricklefs and Matthew, 1982; Wright et al., 2004; Hättenschwiler et al., 2008; Comas and Eissenstat, 2009; Liu et al., 2010), many traits showed remarkable cross-species variation among the 12 coexisting fern species (Table 1; Supplementary data Table S1). This can be explained by the heterogeneity in microhabitats because our study site is located in an area with a relatively important variability in topographic reliefs and hence differ in soil fertility, light and water conditions (Yang et al., 2001; Sun et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2019). Such variability in environmental conditions may favour the existence of different resource-use strategies, thereby explaining why different ferns species vary in their main morphological and physiological traits.

As expected by the plant economics spectrum theory (Wright et al., 2004; Freschet et al., 2010; Reich, 2014), many traits varied in opposite directions among the 12 coexisting fern species (e.g. SLA and nutrient concentrations vs. DMC and C:N:P ratios). Accordingly, in agreement with our hypothesis, different species were relatively well segregated along the first PCA axis, for each plant organ considered (Fig. 2). Fern species found at the positive side of the first PCA axis presented traits linked to resource acquisition, i.e. with high SLA and leaf N and P concentrations, and high root pH and P concentration (Wright et al., 2004; Freschet et al., 2010). Fern species located at the negative side of the first PCA axis presented a rather conservative resource-using strategy, i.e. with high leaf DMC, C concentration and C:N:P ratios, along with high root DMC, C:P ratio, C, cellulose and lignin concentrations (Wright et al., 2004; Freschet et al., 2010). These results are in line with previous studies on seed plants (Bakker et al., 2011; Roumet et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2018), and highlight that, although ferns and seed plants obviously differ in their morphological, physiological traits and evaluation (Page, 1979; Brodribb et al., 2005; Han et al., 2005; Karst and Lechowicz, 2007; Sharpe et al., 2010; Carriqui et al., 2015; Tosens et al., 2016), the co-variation patterns of key economics functional traits do not depend on the specific plant group. This further suggests that the evolutionary and ecological basis for the relationships among these key economics traits appear to be similar between ferns and seed plants.

We also found that plant trait variation is co-ordinated between above- and below-ground organs (Table 2; Fig. 3A). Indeed, most traits representative of the resource acquisitive strategy were clearly segregated from traits representative of the resource conservation strategy along the first PCA axis, based on either leaf or root traits. Functionally, this indicates that acquisitive plant species with large and thin leaves, high evaporative demand and high photosynthetic rates also require acquisitive roots to ensure enough water and nutrient supply to maintain high growth rates (Eissenstat, 2002.; Fort et al., 2013; Reich, 2014). Conversely, conservative plant species with small and thick leaves and slow growth rates invest more in structural C compounds and have lower photosynthetic rates and nutrient demands. Therefore, we conclude that the co-ordination between above- and below-ground organs allows for an optimization of the resource-use strategy at the whole-plant level. However, we also found that some key trait pairs were not significantly correlated between leaves and roots, such as the SLA–SRL and N concentrations (Table 2). This suggests that the extrapolation from above- to below-ground organs requires some caution (Freschet et al., 2010; Reich, 2014), especially given that some root traits are decoupled from the variation in leaf traits across various plant species (Weemstra et al., 2016; Bergmann et al., 2017).

Interestingly, some important leaf or root traits were not completely aligned along the leaf or root economics spectra. For example, leaf lignin concentration, a C-related trait that is commonly associated with a resource conservation strategy, was relatively independent from the leaf economics spectrum in ferns (Fig. 2A; Supplementary data Table S2). This may be because lignin may also reflect the plant resistance to pathogens or herbivores (Johnson et al., 2009; War et al., 2012). Similarly, SRL, root N concentration and root C:N ratio, which are the most common root traits used to characterize root economics strategy (e.g. Fort et al., 2013; Roumet et al., 2016), were relatively independent from the root economics spectrum (Fig. 2B; Supplementary data Table S2). This may be because roots also play other pivotal roles such as physical anchoring and resource storage (Kramer-Walter et al., 2016; Weemstra et al., 2016). Overall, these findings suggest that the economic spectra among the 12 coexisting ferns are multidimensional rather than one-dimensional, probably because plant traits can respond to other independent and ecologically important dimensions, such as resistance against grazing, tolerance to stress, resource storage or support functions (War et al., 2012; Kramer-Walter et al., 2016; Chauvin et al., 2018). These results are in line with previous studies on grasses and trees that reported a multidimensional pattern of plant economics spectra, particularly for root traits (Kong et al., 2015, 2019; Kramer-Walter et al., 2016; Weemstra et al., 2016; de la Riva et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2019).

Plant economics spectrum predicts leaf and root decomposition rates

In line with previous studies on litter decomposition across various ecosystems (Vivanco and Austin, 2006; Wang et al., 2010; Birouste et al., 2012; Freschet et al., 2012; Fujii et al., 2016), we found that fern leaves decomposed at faster rates than roots. This is due to the fact that fern roots are poorer in nutrients and structurally more recalcitrant than leaves (e.g. high C:N:P ratios and lignin concentrations) (Table 1). Furthermore, we found that traits predicting decomposition rates differed between leaves and roots (Table 3). Decomposition of fern leaves was strongly determined by their stoichiometry, i.e. C:P and N:P ratios (Table 3). This can be explained by a strong P limitation in our study system, especially because tropical and sub-tropical soils are thought to be P deficient and thus limit the activities of microbial decomposers (Fanin et al., 2013, 2015). In contrast to leaves, decomposition rates of fern roots were more limited by the forms of C compounds (especially the lignin concentration) rather than by N or P availability (Table 3). These results reinforce the idea that the decomposition of energy-rich substrates (fern leaves) are mainly limited by nutrient imbalance, whereas recalcitrant substrates (fern roots) are mainly limited by the availability of labile C compounds (Güsewell and Verhoeven, 2006; Fanin et al., 2016, 2017; de la Riva et al., 2019). This further indicates that plant traits may differ in their predictive power on litter decomposition processes according to the plant organ considered (Wang et al., 2010; Jackson et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2016; Zuo et al., 2018).

Our decomposition experiment also showed that the decomposition rates of leaves and roots were positively correlated, i.e. fern species with rapid leaf decay rates presented rapid root decay rates (Fig. 3B). Our results also indicate that leaf and root economic spectra were good predictors of interspecific variation in decomposition rates especially for root decomposition (Bakker et al., 2011; Freschet et al., 2012; de la Riva et al., 2019), with the acquisitive fern species generally decomposing faster than the conservative fern species (Fig. 4). These results are in accordance with the plant economics framework in which ‘fast’ leaves match ‘fast’ roots and ‘slow’ leaves match ‘slow’ roots (Freschet et al., 2012; Reich, 2014). Furthermore, our results are in line with previous experimental studies and meta-analyses on trees and grasses that reported co-ordination in decomposability between leaves and other plant organs such as roots (Wang et al., 2010; Birouste et al., 2012; Freschet et al., 2012, 2013; Fujii et al., 2016). This further supports the idea that the dynamics of organic matter observed between coexisting plant species above-ground are probably paralleled below-ground, and thus that it is possible to predict decomposability of other organs from the decomposition rate of leaves, also in fern species (Birouste et al., 2012; Freschet et al., 2012, 2013). However, in contrast to our results, Hobbie et al. (2010) found no correlation in decomposition rates between roots and leaves among 11 temperate trees after 510 d. Further, Ma et al. (2016) observed that decomposition rates between leaves and roots were strongly linked during the first 3 months of decomposition, but they were unrelated in the subsequent 12 months. These contrasting results highlight that the relationship between leaf and root decomposition rates may depend on substrate quality or decomposition stage, and more efforts will be necessary to elucidate the (de)coupling between leaf and root traits and their afterlife effects during the decomposition process.

Conclusions

In studies dealing with the trait-based approach at the community level, ferns are commonly not included in the analysis for unconvincing reasons. Our study reveals how above- and below-ground plant traits and litter decomposition processes are linked across 12 coexisting fern species in a sub-tropical forest. We showed that the plant economics spectrum theory (commonly observed across seed plants) can also be applied to these fern species, but further studies including more species and across different sites are needed before any generalization can be made at larger spatial scales. The relatively similar trends in the relationships among above- and below-ground traits and their afterlife effects on decomposition suggest that fern species can fit relatively well into a broader vascular plant economic spectrum (e.g. Reich, 2014). The inclusion of more fern functional traits in databases thus appears to be a priority to better predict decomposition rates across large scales, especially because ferns are rich in diversity and cover a wide geographical area from tropical to boreal ecosystems (Page, 1979; Smith et al., 2006; Kessler, 2010). Furthermore, our results highlight that changes in fern communities caused by anthropogenic disturbance or other environmental factors may have important consequences on C and nutrient cycling through changes in plant functional traits and afterlife effects during the decomposition process. This also underscores the necessity for plant community conservation as a major policy priority for maintaining biogeochemical cycling in sub-tropical forests.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available online at https://academic.oup.com/aob and consist of the following. Table S1: summary of leaf and root functional trait values of the 12 coexisting fern species. Table S2: loadings of functional traits on the first three axes of the principal components analysis for leaf and root traits. Table S3: summary of decomposition rates of the 12 coexisting fern species.

mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S01
mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S02
mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S03

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Professor Hai He in Chongqing Normal University for assisting with fern species identification. We would also like to thank Tania Maxwell, Dr Iván Prieto, anonymous reviewers and the handling editor, Dr Alex Fajardo, for their constructive comments and providing useful suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDXYCH0014] and Chongqing Technology Innovation and Application Demonstration Major Theme Special Project [cstc2018jszx-zdyfxmX0007].

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Bakker MA, Carreno-Rocabado G, Poorter L. 2011. Leaf economics traits predict litter decomposition of tropical plants and differ among land use types. Functional Ecology 25: 473–483. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergmann J, Ryo M, Prati D, Hempel S, Rillig MC. 2017. Root traits are more than analogues of leaf traits: the case for diaspore mass. New Phytologist 216: 1130–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birouste M, Kazakou E, Blanchard A, Roumet C. 2012. Plant traits and decomposition: are the relationships for roots comparable to those for leaves? Annals of Botany 109: 463–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA, Palma B. 2005. Leaf hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms: impacts on photosynthetic maxima. New Phytologist 165: 839–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carriqui M, Cabrera HM, Conesa MA, et al. 2015. Diffusional limitations explain the lower photosynthetic capacity of ferns as compared with angiosperms in a common garden study. Plant, Cell & Environment 38: 448–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chauvin KM, Asner GP, Martin RE, Kress WJ, Wright SJ, Field CB. 2018. Decoupled dimensions of leaf economic and anti-herbivore defense strategies in a tropical canopy tree community. Oecologia 186: 765–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen WL, Zeng H, Eissenstat DM, Guo DL. 2013. Variation of first-order root traits across climatic gradients and evolutionary trends in geological time. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22: 846–856 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng JH, Chu PF, Chen DM, Bai YF. 2016. Functional correlations between specific leaf area and specific root length along a regional environmental gradient in Inner Mongolia grasslands. Functional Ecology 30: 985–997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM. 2009. Patterns in root trait variation among 25 co-existing North American forest species. New Phytologist 182: 919–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornelissen JHC, Quested HM, Logtestijn RSP, et al. 2006. Foliar pH as a new plant trait: can it explain variation in foliar chemistry and carbon cycling processes among subarctic plant species and types? Oecologia 147: 315–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornelissen JHC, Thompson K. 1997. Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. New Phytologist 135: 109–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, et al. 2008. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters 11: 1065–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Craine JM, Froehle J, Tilman GD, Wedin DA, Chapin FS. 2001. The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93: 274–285. [Google Scholar]
  14. Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, et al. 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 295–304. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dolph GE, Dilcher DL. 1980. Variation in leaf size with respect to climate in the tropics of the Western Hemisphere. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 107: 154–162. [Google Scholar]
  16. Eissenstat D. 2002. Root structure and function in an ecological context. New Phytologist 148: 353–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fanin N, Fromin N, Buatois B, Hättenschwiler S. 2013. An experimental test of the hypothesis of non-homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter–microbe system. Ecology Letters 16: 764–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fanin N, Hättenschwiler S, Schimann H, Fromin N, Bailey JK. 2015. Interactive effects of C, N and P fertilization on soil microbial community structure and function in an Amazonian rain forest. Functional Ecology 29: 140–150. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fanin N, Hättenschwiler S, Soria PFC, Fromin N. 2016. (A)synchronous availabilities of N and P regulate the activity and structure of the microbial decomposer community. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1507. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fanin N, Fromin N, Barantal S, Hättenschwiler S. 2017. Stoichiometric plasticity of microbial communities is similar between litter and soil in a tropical rainforest. Scientific Reports 7: 12498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12609-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fort F, Jouany C, Cruz P. 2013. Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species: implications of differing resource-acquisition strategies. Journal of Plant Ecology 6: 211–219. [Google Scholar]
  22. Freschet GT, Cornelissen JHC, van Logtestijn RSP, Aerts R. 2010. Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora. Journal of Ecology 98: 362–373. [Google Scholar]
  23. Freschet GT, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC. 2012. A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability. Functional Ecology 26: 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  24. Freschet GT, Cornwell WK, Wardle DA, et al. 2013. Linking litter decomposition of above- and below-ground organs to plant–soil feedbacks worldwide. Journal of Ecology 101: 943–952. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujii S, Makita N, Mori AS, Takeda H. 2016. Plant species control and soil faunal involvement in the processes of above- and below-ground litter decomposition. Oikos 125: 883–892. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fujii S, Cornelissen JHC, Berg MP, Mori AS. 2018. Tree leaf and root traits mediate soil faunal contribution to litter decomposition across an elevational gradient. Functional Ecology 32: 840–852. [Google Scholar]
  27. Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, et al. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630–2637. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gosz JR, Likens G, Bormann FH. 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs 43: 173–191. [Google Scholar]
  29. Graça MAS, Bärlocher F, Gessner MO. 2005. Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical guide. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  30. Güsewell S, Verhoeven JTA. 2006. Litter N:P ratios indicate whether N or P limits the decomposability of graminoid leaf litter. Plant and Soil 287: 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  31. Han W, Fang J, Guo D, Zhang Y. 2005. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist 168: 377–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hättenschwiler S, Aeschlimann B, Couteaux MM, Roy J, Bonal D. 2008. High variation in foliage and leaf litter chemistry among 45 tree species of a neotropical rainforest community. New Phytologist 179: 165–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hobbie SE, Oleksyn J, Eissenstat DM, Reich PB. 2010. Fine root decomposition rates do not mirror those of leaf litter among temperate tree species. Oecologia, 162: 505–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hollinger DY. 1987. Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance patterns of two fern species from different forest understoreys. Journal of Ecology, 75: 925–935 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jackson BG, Peltzer DA, Wardle DA. 2013. Are functional traits and litter decomposability coordinated across leaves, twigs and wood? A test using temperate rainforest tree species. Oikos 122: 1131–1142. [Google Scholar]
  36. Johnson MTJ, Smith SD, Rausher MD. 2009. Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 18079–18084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones JB. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Karst AL, Lechowicz MJ. 2007. Are correlations among foliar traits in ferns consistent with those in the seed plants? New Phytologist 173: 306–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kessler M. 2010. Biogeography of ferns. In: Mehltreter K, Walker LR, Sharpe JM, eds. Fern ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22–60 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kong DL, Ma CG, Zhang Q, et al. 2014. Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytologist 203: 863–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kong D, Wang J, Wu H, et al. 2019. Nonlinearity of root trait relationships and the root economics spectrum. Nature Communations 10: 2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kramer-Walter KR, Bellingham PJ, Millar TR, Smissen RD, Richardson SJ, Laughlin DC. 2016. Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum. Journal of Ecology 104: 1299–1310. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin DM, Wang F, Fanin N, et al. 2019. Soil fauna promote litter decomposition but do not alter the relationship between leaf economics spectrum and litter decomposability. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 136: 107519. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu GF, Freschet GT, Pan X, et al. 2010. Coordinated variation in leaf and root traits across multiple spatial scales in Chinese semi-arid and arid ecosystems. New Phytologist 188: 543–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lyu M, Xie J, Giardina CP, et al. 2019. Understory ferns alter soil carbon chemistry and increase carbon storage during reforestation with native pine on previously degraded sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 132: 80–92. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ma C, Xiong Y, Li L, Guo D. 2016. Root and leaf decomposition become decoupled over time: implications for below- and above-ground relationships. Functional Ecology 30: 1239–1246. [Google Scholar]
  47. Marsh AS, Arnone JA, Bormann BT, Gordon JC. 2000. The role of Equisetum in nutrient cycling in an Alaskan shrub wetland. Journal of Ecology 88: 999–1011. [Google Scholar]
  48. Newman GS, Hart SC. 2006. Nutrient covariance between forest foliage and fine roots. Forest Ecology and Management, 236: 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  49. Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological system. Ecology 44: 322–331. [Google Scholar]
  50. Osnas JL, Lichstein JW, Reich PB, Pacala SW. 2013. Global leaf trait relationships: mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum. Science 340: 741–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Page CN. 1979. The diversity of ferns. An ecological perspective. In: Dyer AF, ed. The experimental biology of ferns. London: Academic Press, 9–56 [Google Scholar]
  52. Perez-Ramos IM, Roumet C, Cruz P, Blanchard A, Autran P, Garnier E. 2012. Evidence for a ‘plant community economics spectrum’ driven by nutrient and water limitations in a Mediterranean rangeland of southern France. Journal of Ecology 100: 1315–1327. [Google Scholar]
  53. Prieto I, Roumet C, Cardinael R, et al. 2015. Root functional parameters along a land-use gradient: evidence of a community-level economics spectrum. Journal of Ecology 103: 361–373. [Google Scholar]
  54. R Core Team 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  55. Reich PB. 2014. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology 102: 275–301. [Google Scholar]
  56. Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB, et al. 1999. Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes. Ecology 80: 1955–1969. [Google Scholar]
  57. Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, et al. 2003. The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: S143–S164. [Google Scholar]
  58. Richardson SJ, Walker LR. 2010. Nutrient ecology of ferns. In: Mehltreter K, Walker LR, Sharpe JM, eds. Fern ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–139. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ricklefs RE, Matthew KK. 1982. Chemical characteristics of the foliage of some deciduous trees in southeastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 60: 2037–2045. [Google Scholar]
  60. de la Riva EG, Tosto A, Perez-Ramos IM, et al. 2016. A plant economics spectrum in Mediterranean forests along environmental gradients: is there coordination among leaf, stem and root traits? Journal of Vegetation Science 27: 187–199. [Google Scholar]
  61. de la Riva EG, Marañón T, Pérez-Ramos IM, Navarro-Fernández CM, Olmo M, Villar R. 2018. Root traits across environmental gradients in Mediterranean woody communities: are they aligned along the root economics spectrum? Plant and Soil 424: 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  62. de la Riva EG, Prieto I, Villar R. 2019. The leaf economic spectrum drives leaf litter decomposition in Mediterranean forests. Plant and Soil 435: 353–366. [Google Scholar]
  63. Roumet C, Birouste M, Picon-Cochard C, et al. 2016. Root structure–function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytologist 210: 815–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Santiago LS. 2007. Extending the leaf economics spectrum to decomposition: evidence from a tropical forest. Ecology 88: 1126–1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sessa EB, Givnish TJ. 2014. Leaf form and photosynthetic physiology of Dryopteris species distributed along light gradients in eastern North America. Functional Ecology 28: 108–123. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sharpe JM, Mehltreter K, Walker LR. 2010. Ecological importance of ferns. inMehltreter K, Walker LR, Sharpe JM, eds. Fern ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith AR, Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Korall P, Schneider H, Wolf PG. 2006. A classification for extant ferns. Taxon 55: 705–731. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sun YH, Zhang HJ, Cheng JH, Wang YJ, Shi J, Chen Y. 2006. Soil characteristics and water conservation of different forest types in Jinyun Mountain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 20: 106–109. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  70. Tjoelker MG, Craine JM, Wedin D, Reich PB, Tilman D. 2005. Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species. New Phytologist 167: 493–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tosens T, Nishida K, Gago J, et al. 2016. The photosynthetic capacity in 35 ferns and fern allies: mesophyll CO2 diffusion as a key trait. New Phytologist 209: 1576–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Vivanco L, Austin AT. 2006. Intrinsic effects of species on leaf litter and root decomposition: a comparison of temperate grasses from North and South America. Oecologia 150: 97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882–892. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wang H, Liu S, Mo J. 2010. Correlation between leaf litter and fine root decomposition among subtropical tree species. Plant and Soil 335: 289–298. [Google Scholar]
  75. War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, et al. 2012. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7: 1306–1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S. 2012. smatr 3 – an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 257–259. [Google Scholar]
  77. Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJW, et al. 2016. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review. New Phytologist 211: 1159–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wright IJ, Ackerly DD, Bongers F, et al. 2007. Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven Neotropical forests. Annals of Botany 99: 1003–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, et al. 2005. Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytologist 166: 485–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wu XQ, Yang SH, Huang L, et al. 2019. Effects of forest canopy condition on the establishment of Castanopsis fargesii seedlings in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 43: 55–64. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang SF, Dou PP, Wang HJ, et al. 2019. Patterns of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics during decomposition of fern leaf and fine root in a subtropical forest. Chinese Science Bulletin 64: 2430–2440. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  83. Yang WQ, Zhong ZC, Tao JP, He WM. 2001. Study on temporal and spatial characteristics of available soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium among the forest ecosystem of Mt. Jinyun. Acta Ecologica Sinica 21: 1285–1289. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhou M, Bai W, Zhang Y, Zhang WH, Mommer L. 2018. Multi-dimensional patterns of variation in root traits among coexisting herbaceous species in temperate steppes. Journal of Ecology 106: 2320–2331. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zukswert JM, Prescott CE. 2017. Relationships among leaf functional traits, litter traits, and mass loss during early phases of leaf litter decomposition in 12 woody plant species. Oecologia 185: 305–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zuo J, Hefting MM, Berg MP, et al. 2018. Is there a tree economics spectrum of decomposability? Soil Biology & Biochemistry 119: 135–142. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S01
mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S02
mcz166_suppl_Supplementary_S03

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES