Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Mar 18;10:4947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61962-8

Modeling current and future global distribution of Chrysomya bezziana under changing climate

Eslam M Hosni 1,✉, Mohamed G Nasser 1, Sara A Al-Ashaal 1, Magda H Rady 1, Mohamed A Kenawy 1
PMCID: PMC7080715  PMID: 32188920

Abstract

In the last few years, significant changes in climate have had a disparate effect on biodiversity. The influences of these changes are random and unpredictable. The resurgence of insect pests, especially of medical and veterinary importance, often corresponds with climate changes. The Old World screwworm, Chrysomya bezziana, is one of the most important myiasis-causing flies that parasitize warm-blooded animals in the Eastern Hemisphere. We used a spatial distribution modeling approach to estimate the consequences of climatic changes on the potential geographic distribution of this insect throughout the world currently and in the future. A Maxent model used occurrence data from 104 localities and 19 climatic factors to predict the suitable habitat regions throughout the world. Two representative concentration pathways 2.6 and 8.5, were used to forecast the future distribution of C. bezziana in 2050 and 2070. The Maxent model for C. bezziana provided a satisfactory result, with a high value of the Area Under Curve equal to 0.855 (±0.001). Furthermore, the True Skilled Statistics value is equal to 0.67. These values indicate the significant influence on the model of the ecology of this fly species. Jackknife test indicated that temperature variables play a significant role in C. bezziana dynamics. The resultant models indicated the areas at risk of invasion by potential serious medical/veterinary issues, especially in countries with a large livestock production.

Subject terms: Entomology, Biogeography

Introduction

Throughout the long history of our planet, the climate has changed dramatically, but in the last few decades global warming has become more tangible even for the layman1,2. Greenhouse gases emitted as a result of anthropogenic action are the main factors driving global warming3. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has predicted an increase of about a 1.8–4 °C in global temperature by the end of the 21st century as a result of high CO2 levels4. This form a challenge for many ecosystems throughout the world, threatening ecological processes and impacting on biodiversity, including insects5. Conversely, climate change is one of the most important factors associated with the resurgence of insect pests. Many medically important pests such as mosquitoes (Culicidae) will invade new regions because of changes in global temperature6. Flies that cause myiasis will also be able to invade new regions and impact the livestock economy in different parts of the world.

Myiasis is a type of parasitism in which the living tissues of a vertebrate host are infested by dipterous larvae7. This phenomenon is widespread throughout the world, especially the tropical regions. It usually occurs in both domestic and wild animals and, under certain conditions, in humans8,9.

The Old World screwworm fly (OWSF) Chrysomya bezziana (Villeneuve) is an obligate parasite causing myiasis in animals and humans in the Eastern Hemisphere7,9,10. Females deposit their eggs in wounds or near the natural body orifices of the targeted host. Then the maggots burrow and feed on the living tissue, causing severe injury and even death in untreated cases11. As a result of this feeding habit, C. bezziana is considered to be a primary pest of great medical importance and the cause of economic losses among domesticated animals9,12. In the Eastern Hemisphere, particularly in Iraq in the 1990s, the FAO estimated the economic loss to the livestock industry as a result of the OWSF invasion to be US$ 8,555,00013. Other research studies have estimated the annual losses in the livestock industries in Australia to be equal to A$500 million due to the possible incursion of the OWSF14.

To date, OWSF prefers tropical and subtropical climates. It is widespread throughout tropical and Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East region, the Indian subcontinent, from Southeast Asia to China, and the Philippines to Papua New Guinea15,16. Recently, OWSF has been expanding out of its typical range through the commercial movement of livestock and possibly also due to climate change17. The distribution of OWSF in the Eastern Hemisphere and of the ecologically convergent New World screwworm fly (NWSF) Cochliomyia hominivorax (Coquerel) in the Western Hemisphere is usually limited by temperatures10.

On several occasions, NWSF has been transported to the Eastern Hemisphere10. For example, a veterinary record about a case of otitis in a dog was recorded in 198218. In 1988, an accidental introduction of NWSF occurred from an endemic area of South America to Libya10,19. Three years later, a wide range of infested animals were detected in about 25,000 km2 around Tripoli, Libya20. The FAO released a large-scale control program for the eradication of NWSF via the sterile insect technique, with a cost of US$750 million17. Intensive surveillance and prevention programs were set up by official Egyptian veterinary official institutions to prevent the accidental introduction of NWSF from the western border with Libya19. Although no cases of myiasis caused by OWSF have been recorded in the Western Hemisphere, about four species of Chrysomya have been established in the New World21.

The negative impact of environmental challenges is becoming the main obstacle for the sustainable development of human health and the livestock industry. Climate change forms one of these challenges, and predicting the relationship between species diversity and climate changes has become an active research issue22,23. Also, predictions of the scientific community and decision-makers to the future risks of pest introductions, allow them to create a driven strategy to face climate change impacts on biodiversity and medical sectors24.

Spatial- and temporal-based models could establish monitoring programs that act as early warning signs during the process of climate change25. Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a method that predicts and describes the precise niche of each species26,27. This can be achieved by using the presence-only data and assumed environmental variables28. CLIMEX, GARP, HABITAT, and MaxEnt are popular tools used to estimate the current and future distribution of targeted species under different climate change scenarios29–31. Predictive models of economically important livestock and human health pests are considered to be one of the most urgent direct goals of such modeling techniques3,32. The objective of the present research is to predict the potential spatial distribution of OWSF throughout the world by using the geographic information system and bioclimatic variables for its current and future status.

Methods

Occurrence records

Almost all available records of OWSF were collected from the literature either from adult flies or from medical and veterinary larval cases23,33–35. The records of OWSF in the digital database (www.cabi.org) were also considered13. The occurrence data from 104 localities were converted into comma-delimited (CSV) formats and used to assess habitat suitability for OWSF throughout the world (see Supplementary dataset).

Climatic data

Bioclimatic data were obtained from (www.worldclim.org) with a spatial resolution of approximately 5 km2. A total of 19 climate variables, originally derived from monthly temperature and rainfall values collected from weather stations in 1950–2000, were used to depict the current global climate (Table 1 & see Supplementary information S1). These layers were converted to ASCII format using ArcGIS v 10.3 and used to evaluate the most important variables which contribute biologically to the current model of C. bezziana habitat suitability. Bioclimatic variables 8–9 and 18–19 were eliminated from the analysis, due to spatial artifacts in those variables36: these layers showed odd discontinuous spatial anomalies between neighboring pixels which lead to lack of resolutions in resulted layers37. For future data, we used parallel datasets for global climate model (GCM) from two representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 2.6 and 8.5 to account for the future distribution of OWSF based on carbon dioxide emission for 2050 (average of predictions for 2041–2060) and 2070 (average of predictions for 2061–2080)38–40 (see Supplementary information S2). These future data layers were also converted to ASCII format via ArcGIS v 10.3. Then the climatic data of the selected variables was projected on to the years 2050 and 2070 from the global climate model of the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI-CGCM3), to assess the effects of climate change on the OWSF habitat suitability in the future. These data are among the recent GCM climate projections that are used in the Fifth Assessment IPCC Report.

Table 1.

Bioclimatic variables used in Maxent to predict the preliminary model of the current distribution of Chrysomya bezziana.

Variable Description
Bio 1 Annual mean temperature
Bio2 Mean Diurnal Range (Mean of monthly max temp – min temp)
Bio 3 Isothermality (bio2 / bio7) (*100)
Bio 4 Temperature Seasonality (standard deviation *100)
Bio 5 Max Temperature of Warmest Month
Bio 6 Min Temperature of Coldest Month
Bio 7 Temperature Annual Range
Bio 8 Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter
Bio 9 Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter
Bio 10 Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter
Bio 11 Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter
Bio 12 Annual Precipitation
Bio 13 Precipitation of Wettest Month
Bio 14 Precipitation of Driest Month
Bio 15 Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)
Bio 16 Precipitation of Wettest Quarter
Bio 17 Precipitation of Driest Quarter
Bio 18 Precipitation of Warmest Quarter
Bio 19 Precipitation of Coldest Quarter
Open in a new tab

Habitat suitability modeling

The maximum entropy algorithm implemented in Maxent v3.3.3e was used to estimate the habitat suitability and ecological niche of C. bezziana41. This algorithm yields an excellent predictive models that rely on presence data only26,41. Also, It is effective in modeling studies with small sample sizes and is able to remove the duplicate records in the same cell26,42. Additionally, the response curve for each bioclimatic variable was used to estimate the relationship between the habitat suitability for a species that varies from 0 (lowest suitability) to 1 (highest suitability) and bioclimatic variables43. In our models, 75% of the occurrence records were used for training whereas 25% of the records used for testing the model44. The maximum number of background points and the number of iterations was 10,000 and 1000 respectively. Furthermore, the process was repeated in a 10-fold cross-validation, which improved the model performance31,44,45.

A set of five biologically significant bioclimatic variables was chosen to produce the final models based on several statistical analysis: (Bio 1) Annual mean temperature, (Bio 3) Isothermality, (Bio 6) Min temperature of the coldest month, (Bio 10) Mean temperature of the warmest quarter and (Bio 11) Mean temperature of the coldest quarter. First, the Jackknife function of MaxEnt was used to estimate the most important set of variables from the 19 bioclimatic factors by discarding the variables contributed less than 70% (see Supplementary Fig. S3). Species Distribution Modeling (SDM) Tools in ArcGIS 10.3 (Universal tool; Explore climate data; Remove highly correlated variable) were then used to remove variables with high correlations46. As the five most important variables were related to temperature, the environmental envelope test evaluated the impact of precipitation variables on the distribution of C. bezziana by using DIVA-GIS 7.5 software (Fig. 1). The generated graph indicated that the precipitation variables show less or no contribution to C. bezziana distribution as 88.2% of all records used in the model occur on the envelope which has the expanded range of Annual precipitation (Bio 12) in contrast to the narrow range of annual mean temperature (Bio 1). Such analysis indicates the null effect of all precipitation variables on the final models.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Environmental envelope model of recorded points of Chrysomya bezziana, the envelope showing the wide range of Annual precipitation (Bio 12) against an effective small range of Annual mean temperature (Bio 1).

Model evaluation

The area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was used to estimate the model performance, and its value varies from 0 (random discrimination) to 1 (perfect discrimination). Higher AUC values suggested significant influences of the model with the ecology of OWSF. Values less than 0.5 indicated poor-fitting models while AUC values more than 0.75 indicated high-fitting of the models47,48. In addition, the True Skilled Statistics (TSS), a common statistical method, was used to evaluate the accuracy of predicted models. TSS values range from -1 to 1 and values that are close to negative or zero imply that the distribution is not much better than random, while values close to 1 indicate an intimate relationship between the model prediction and distribution49.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies dealing directly with animals, and all applicable international, national and /or institutional ethical guidelines were taken in consideration during preparation of this manuscript.

Results

The occurrence data of OWSF were taken from 104 localities throughout the World. Generally, OWSF occurs in tropical and subtropical climates. Most of the occurrence records were geographically distributed across Africa and Asia.

Modeling performance

The Maxent model for OWSF provided a high value of the Area Under Curve (AUC) equal to 0.855 (±0.001) (see Supplementary Fig. S4). In continuous species distribution modeling, the values of AUC tended to be high rather than discontinuous. Also, model performance tended to be excellent due to the high value of the true skilled statistics (TSS) equals 0.67. Normally, TSS values of ≥0.5 are acceptable.

Contribution of bioclimatic variables

The jackknife test illustrated the contribution percent of bioclimatic variables of the predictive distribution model (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Annual mean temperature (Bio 1) made the largest contribution to OWSF distribution with 48.4%, followed by Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter (Bio 11), Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter (Bio 10), with 30.1% and 9.9 respectively. The remaining variables, Min Temperature of Coldest Month (Bio 6) and Isothermality (Bio 3), had only a minor effect with 6.1% and 5.5%, respectively. Response curves of the most contributory environmental variables (Fig. 3) suggested that the favorable annual mean temperature of OWSF ranged from 28 °C to 30 °C. Notably, Bio 11 and Bio 10 critically affected OWSF distribution.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Jackknife test for Chrysomya bezziana showing the most effective environmental variables.

Table 2.

Relative percentages of bioclimatic variables used in Maxent to model the current and future habitat suitability of Chrysomya bezziana.

Bioclimatic variables Description Contribution percentages
Bio 1 Annual mean temperature 48.4%
Bio 11 Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter 30.1%
Bio 10 Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter 9.9%
Bio 6 Min Temperature of Coldest Month 6.1%
Bio 3 Isothermality (bio2 / bio7) (*100) 5.5%
Open in a new tab

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Response curves of the most relevant environmental factors affecting the distribution of Chrysomya bezziana; the shown values are average of ten replicate runs.

The Predicted current potential distribution

The predictive model generally agreed with the occurrence records in regions that already have OWSF infestations. In Africa, our predicted model is compatible with the real distribution of the fly from the Horn of African to Sierra Leone. It also shows some other areas with a high existing probability such as Niger, Algeria, and Mali (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Current potential distribution of Chrysomya bezziana with three zonation areas in South America, the Middle East region and Australia.

In Asia, the potential distribution of OWSF occupies most of the currently-infested areas. The Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malay Peninsula, Malaysia and Philippine Islands) and Papua New Guinea (PNG) showed a high to very high habitat suitability, respectively (Fig. 4a). On the other hand, central and northern Asia indicated a high level of distributional limitations.

In Europe, geographical barriers have prevented the movement of OWSF. However, the southern areas of Europe along the Mediterranean Sea, especially the Greek islands, Malta, and southern Italy, showed high habitat suitability (Fig. 4a).

In the Americas, the results indicate areas that were predicted as suitable but are not currently occupied by OWSF: coastal Florida, Cuba, and the Bahamas displayed high habitat suitability (Fig. 4a). The model also showed a high suitability in the uplands of the Amazon River Basin, coastal Brazil along the Atlantic Ocean and the Galapagos Islands of Ecuador (Fig. 4b).

In the Middle East, OWSF is endemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the Sultanate of Oman, Iraq, Iran, and incidentally in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Yemen. Our model confirmed this distribution and indicated other areas with a very high habitat suitability in the Hejaz west of Saudi Arabia, the mountains of Sarawat and the coastal region of Yemen along the Indian Oceans. The OWSF is not currently established in Egypt. However, the northern strip along the Mediterranean Sea had a high habitat suitability. Also, the coastal regions of the Nile Delta and the coastal strip of the Red Sea in Sinai exhibited a very high habitat suitability (Fig. 4c).

Australia is the only continent with a tropical zone without a true invasion of OWSF. The current distribution model (Fig. 4d) indicated a very high habitat suitability in the northern strip, especially at Port Darwin. A high habitat suitability is also evident in the Northern Territory and parts of Queensland. The Fiji island, New Caledonia and the Solomon Islands show a very high habitat suitability for the fly without any true records until now.

The Predicted future potential distribution for 2050 and 2070

The overall distribution patterns throughout the Old World between the present-day and future models showed reasonable similarities except in some regions. Furthermore, the future predictions showed some differences between RCPs in 2050 and 2070 (Figs. 5, 6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Predicted future distribution of Chrysomya bezziana under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs 2.6, 8.5) of climate conditions in 2050.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Predicted future distribution of Chrysomya bezziana under two representative concentration pathways (RCPs 2.6, 8.5) of climate conditions in 2070.

For the time period 2050, except for the African Sahara which showed a low suitability, the future model in RCPs 2.6 and 8.5 confirmed a high habitat suitability in the Horn of African, Sub-Saharan Africa and West Africa. In Asia, endemic regions (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Sultanate of Oman, Iraq, Iran, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Yemen) and the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia and PNG showed a very high suitability (Fig. 5a,b). For RCPs 2.6 and 8.5 during 2070, the predictive model illustrated a dramatic change in OWSF distribution and habitat suitability in the African continent. Nevertheless, the endemic regions of Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and South east Asia still show a very high habitat suitability (Fig. 6a,b). Interactive calibrated maps show the gain and loss of the overall habitat suitability differences among current and future models are provided here as supplementary materials (see Supplementary Figs. S5–S9).

Discussion

Throughout the world, myiasis is considered to be a neglected health and veterinary concern50. The Old World screwworm fly is one of the most important myiases-producing agents7. It poses a great threat to the livestock industry in many parts of the world10,15. The present study provides updated and detailed maps about the current and future global distribution of OWSF in the light of climate changes. Our generated maps are of public health and veterinary importance as they estimate the potential distribution of OWSF in the Eastern Hemisphere and predict susceptible regions of invasion outside the actual currently-known distribution of this fly. These model maps also illustrate the influence of climate changes on OWSF distribution. Furthermore, these findings can assist concerned international organizations and decision-makers to assess surveillance and control programs for OWSF.

Only one previous study compared the global distribution of OWSF with the predicted distribution using CLIMEX in relation to climatic factors15. Another powerful and updated predictive tool is Maxent. Maxent models are characterized by their robust predictive powers for the potential distribution of species51. Also, its statistical algorithm is accurate even with small occurrence records. Our Maxent model showed that the predicted habitat suitability agreed strongly with the actual occurrence of OWSF records with a high AUC value, which suggests a close relationship between the model and the ecology of the species. Moreover, the TSS value of 0.67 illustrated a perfect agreement between the model predictions and fly’s distribution.

Previous studies emphasized that temperature is the most significant variable that affects OWSF distribution14,15. Our model agrees with this finding, and the ambient temperature variables were the most effective bioclimatic variables of jackknife test that affected OWSF distribution. These variables are Annual mean temperature (Bio 1), with the largest contribution to OWSF distribution (48.4%), followed by Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter (Bio 11) and Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter (Bio 10) with 30.1% and 9.9%, respectively. The remaining variable was Minimum Temperature of Coldest Month (Bio 6) with 6.4%. The cumulative contribution of these variables equals 94.8% (Table 2, Fig. 3). All response curves of the five temperature bioclimatic variables show an increase in habitat suitability of fly up to a certain point at which a further increase in temperature could eliminate the fly from the ecosystem.

The current model for the potential distribution of the OWSF is closely associated with present-day distributions except for minor changes. Old World screwworm flies naturally occupy tropical and subtropical areas of Asia and Africa. Even a sudden increase of 3 °C in annual mean temperature in different eco-climatic zones of the Old World is considered tolerable for OWSF (Fig. 3). Only in the middle and northern Asia were there considerable distribution limitations of OWSF due to low temperatures in the coldest quarter. Our model highlighted areas with large livestock production, such as Brazil and the northern regions of Australia, as being of high and very high habitat suitability even though they are still free from this fly.

With the influence of climatic change, the potential distribution and population dynamics of OWSF were greatly affected by rises in temperature. The future GCM models of 2050 and 2070 with RCPs 2.6 and 8.5 illustrate a high risk in areas with a large livestock production. This also agreed with the previous CLIMEX model of the potential geographic distribution of OWSF15. Both models showed a high suitability in the Western Hemisphere, especially in Brazil and an undoubted high risk in Australia associated with the movement of animals within the countries of Southeast Asia and PNG.

Australia forms a special case for OWSF invasion risk. The country is close to the fly risk areas in the oriental region. The current and future models show a high and a very high suitability of northern Australia to OWSF. In the real world, Australia has already faced some cases of OWSF detection on quarantines on northern harbors due to livestock trades including a collection of adult male and female flies52. So, the resultant models act as a warning guard for Australian quarantine authority to avoid the possible invasion of OWSF to their northern territory14. A similar status of incursion has occurred in Libya with NWSF20,53, the FAO estimated the cost of eradication-via a sterile insect technique- to reach US$750 million17.

In Africa, the effect of climate change is unequivocal (Figs. 5, 6). The future models showed that the increase in temperature affected the distribution of OWSF negatively because of a low habitat suitability, especially in Central and Southern Africa. Moreover, the occurrence of OWSF will be restricted to the region of West Africa and the Horn of African (Figs. 5, 6).

Across Asia, all future models confirmed that the Indian subcontinent, Southeast Asia, the southern parts of China and PNG have a high suitability for OWSF (Figs. 5, 6). In other areas in the Middle East, the endemicity of flies increased because of a high suitability. This agreed with the FAO report about the geospatial demarcation of OWSF in the Middle East51. This report confirmed the influence of temperature on the potential distribution of OWSF in the Middle East.

The future models for 2050 and 2070 also indicated the risk of future invasions into southern part of North America and South America. In the same way, islands with a fragile ecosystem, an economy based on livestock trades or low population densities, such as the Bahamas, Fiji island, Galapagos, New Caledonia, Socotra and the Solomon Islands, have a high habitat suitability for OWSF invasion (Figs. 5, 6). Effective planning by quarantine authorities, especially in such sensitive ecosystems, is very important to avoid economic damage.

Our study gives an important insight into the current and future status of C. bezziana throughout the world. The distribution models generated in this study, based only on climatological variables, assess the effect of climate change on the current and future distribution of OWSF. Several publications have used only the climatic variables for this purpose54–59. Incorporating other environmental variables such as human population, land cover, vegetation index, host animal distribution, etc, could improve the resultant models. But the absence of future data on these variables could limit their use for studies which assess the effect of climate change on the current distribution models.

Conclusion

GIS techniques along with climatological variables could help in developing models to assess the habitat suitability of specific insect pest species. In this study, we have successfully modeled the current and future global distribution of OWSF. With a spatial resolution of 5 km2 throughout the world, the models indicated current areas at risk and other regions with suitable habitat that could undergo new invasions by OWSF in the future. These patterns of models could help decision-makers and quarantine authorities to expedite control programs for such pests which have serious impact on human health and livestock industry. They also pave the way to furthers investigations on a local scale, especially for areas predicated to be highly suitable, with the incorporation of ecological criteria such as altitude and anthropogenic factors in addition to climatological factors for modeling this interesting veterinary pest. It is important that records of occurrence and georeferencing locations should be shared globally through a common-language database, as a paucity of records could impede successful modeling strategies59.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (457.1KB, pdf)
Supplementary information2 (2.8KB, csv)

Acknowledgements

This work is a part of the corresponding author’s Ph.D. research on the evolution of myiasis in family Calliphoridae (Diptera) in addition to the present and future distribution status of C. bezziana through the world. The authors would like to thank the Dean of the Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University and Entomology Department, staff for their continuous encouragement and support during the study. We are particularly grateful to Dr. Boris C. Kondratieff, Director, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University and Dr. Adrian Pont, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Oxford, UK, for language revision. Extended thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

Author contributions

The idea of this research article originated with Mohamed G. Nasser and Eslam M. Hosni. The collected literature and data analysis were carried out by Eslam M. Hosni, Mohamed G. Nasser and Sara A. Al-Ashaal. The critical revision of the paper was by Mohamed A. Kenway and Magda H. Rady. All authors approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-61962-8.

References

  • 1.Bell A. Climate of opinion: public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse Soc. 1994;5:33–64. doi: 10.1177/0957926594005001003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keller CF. Global warming: a review of this mostly settled issue. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A. 2009;23:643–676. doi: 10.1007/s00477-008-0253-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ge X, et al. Potential Distribution Predicted for Rhynchophorus ferrugineus in China under Different Climate Warming Scenarios. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.IPCC. Climate Change. The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2007).
  • 5.Nooten, S. S., Andrew, N. R. & Hughes, L. Potential impacts of climate change on insect communities: a transplant experiment. PloS One. 9, e85987, 10.1371/journal.pone.0085987 PMID: 24465827 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Reiter P. Climate change and mosquito-borne disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001;109:141–161. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zumpt, F. Myiasis in Man and Animals in the Old World. Butterworths, London, United Kingdom (1965).
  • 8.Hassona Y, Scully C, Aguida M, Almeida OPD. Flies and the mouth. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2014;5:98–103. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scholl, P. J., Colwell, D. D. & Cepeda-Palacios. R. Myiasis (Muscoidea, Oestroidea), 3rd edition. [Mullen, G. R. & Durden, L, A.] Medical and veterinary entomology. 19, 383–419. (Academic Press, 2019).
  • 10.James LA. Screwworms. Zoonosis Update. 2006;228:357–367. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spradbery P. Screwworm fly: A tale of two species. Agric. Zool. Rev. 1994;6:1–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hall M, Wall R. Myiasis of humans and domestic animals. Adv. Parasitol. 1995;35:257–334. doi: 10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60073-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.CABI. Chrysomya bezziana (Old-world screwworm). In: Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB international, https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/88417 (2018).
  • 14.Fruean SN, East IJ. Spatial analysis of targeted surveillance for screwworm fly (Chrysomya bezziana or Cochliomyia hominivorax) in Australia. Aust. Vet. J. 2014;92:254–262. doi: 10.1111/avj.12197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sutherst RW, Spradbery JP, Maywald GF. The potential geographical distribution of the Old World screwworm fly, Chrysomya bezziana. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1989;3:273–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1989.tb00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brown WV, Morton R, Lacey MJ, Spradbery JP, Mahon RJ. Identification of the geographical source of adults of the Old World Screwworm fly, Chrysomya bezziana Villeneuve (Diptera: Calliphoridae) by multivariate analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. - B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1998;119:391–399. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0491(97)00365-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reichard R. Case studies of emergency management of screwworm. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1999;18:145–163. doi: 10.20506/rst.18.1.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chermette R. A case of canine otitis due to screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax, in France. Vet. Rec. 1989;124:641. doi: 10.1136/vr.124.24.641-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.El-Azazy OME. Observations on the New World screwworm fly in Libya and the risk of its entrance into Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 1992;42:303–310. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(92)90072-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lindquist DA, Abusowa M, Hall M. The New World screwworm fly in Libya: a review of its introduction and eradication. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1992;6:2–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1992.tb00027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baumgartner DL. Spread of introduced Chrysomya blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) in the neotropics with records new to Venezuela. BIOTROPICA. 1988;20:167–168. doi: 10.2307/2388191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dillon ME, Wang G, Huey RB. Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming. Nature. 2010;467:704–706. doi: 10.1038/nature09407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hall M, et al. Phylogenetics of the Old World screwworm fly and its significance for planning control and monitoring invasions in Asia. Int. J. Parasitol. 2012;42:729–738. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Parmesan C, Duarte CM, Poloczanska E, Richardson AJ, Singer MC. Overstretching attribution. Nat. Clim. Change. 2011;1:2–4. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Midgley GF, Hannah L, Millar D, Rutherford MC, Powrie LW. Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2002;11:445–451. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00307.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bosso L, et al. Loss of potential bat habitat following a severe wildfire: a model-based rapid assessment. Int. J. Wildland Fire. 2018;27(11):756–769. doi: 10.1071/WF18072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Runquist RDB, Lake T, Tiffin P, Moeller DA. Species distribution models throughout the invasion history of Palmer amaranth predict regions at risk of future invasion and reveal challenges with modeling rapidly shifting geographic ranges. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):2426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38054-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilson CD, Roberts D, Reid N. Applying species distribution modelling to identify areas of high conservation value for endangered species: a case study using Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) Biol. Cons. 2011;144:821–829. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo S, et al. Projecting the Potential Global Distribution of Carpomya vesuviana (Diptera: Tephritidae), Considering Climate Change and Irrigation Patterns. For. 2019;10(4):355. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Byeon DH, et al. Prediction of global geographic distribution of Metcalfa pruinosa using CLIMEX. Entomological Res. 2018;48(2):99–107. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bo W, et al. Predicting the current and future cultivation regions of Carthamus tinctorius L. using MaxEnt model under climate change in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018;16:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Russo D, Bosso L, Ancillotto L. Novel perspectives on bat insectivory highlight the value of this ecosystem service in farmland: Research frontiers and management implications. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018;266:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morgan JAT, Urech R. An improved real-time PCR assay for the detection of Old World screwworm flies. Acta Trop. 2014;138:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stevens JR. The evolution of myiasis in blowflies (Calliphoridae) Int. J. Parasitol. 2003;33:1105–1113. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00136-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zaidi F, et al. Distribution Modeling of three screwworm species in the ecologically diverse landscape of North West Pakistan. Acta Trop. 2016;162:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Samy AM, et al. Climate Change Influences on the Global Potential Distribution of the Mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, Vector of West Nile Virus and Lymphatic Filariasis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Escobar LE, Lira-Noriega A, Medina-Vogel G, Townsend PA. Potential for spread of the white-nose fungus (Pseudogymnoascus destructans) in the Americas: use of Maxent and Niche A to assure strict model transference. Geospat Health. 2014;9(1):221–229. doi: 10.4081/gh.2014.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mohammadi S, Ebrahimi E, Moghadam MS, Bosso L. Modelling current and future potential distributions of two desert jerboas under climate change in Iran. Ecol. Inform. 2019;52:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Heringer G, Bueno ML, Meira-Neto JA, Matos FA, Neri AV. Can Acacia mangium and Acacia auriculiformis hinder restoration efforts in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest under current and future climate conditions? Biol. Invasions. 2019;21(9):2949–2962. doi: 10.1007/s10530-019-02024-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005;25:1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006;190(3):231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Townsend PA. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 2007;34:102–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Khanum R, Mumtaz A, Kumar S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecol. 2013;49:23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2013.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31:161–175. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kessler H, Ganser C, Glass EG. Modeling the Distribution of Medically Important Tick Species in Florida. Insects. 2019;10:190. doi: 10.3390/insects10070190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alkishe AA, Peterson AT, Samy AM, Climate change influences on the potential geographic distribution of the disease vector tick Ixodes ricinus. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0189092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 1988;240:1285–1293. doi: 10.1126/science.3287615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mulieri PR, Patitucci LD. Using ecological niche models to describe the geographical distribution of the myiasis-causing Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in southern South America. Parasitol. Res. 2019;118:1077–1086. doi: 10.1007/s00436-019-06267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) J. Appl. Ecol. 2006;43(6):1223–1232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hall M, Wall RL, Stevens JR. Traumatic myiasis: a neglected disease in a changing world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016;61:159–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Naeem M, Yuan X, Huang J, An J. Habitat suitability for the invasion of Bombus terrestris in East Asian countries: A case study of spatial overlap with local Chinese bumblebees. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rajapaksa N, Spradbery JP. Occurrence of the Old World screw-worm fly Chrysomya bezziana on livestock vessels and commercial aircraft. Aust. Vet. J. 1989;66:94–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb09755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gabaj, et al. 1989, Screwworm fly in Libya: A threat to the livestock industry of the Old World. Vet. Rec. 1989;125:347–349. doi: 10.1136/vr.125.13.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li, H. Q., Liu, X. H., Wang, J. H., Xing, L. G. & Fu, Y. Y. Maxent modelling for predicting climate change effects on the potential planting area of tuber mustard in China. J. Agric. Sci., 10.1017/S0021859619000686 (2019).
  • 55.Garrido R, et al. Potential impact of climate change on the geographical distribution of two wild vectors of Chagas disease in Chile: Mepraia spinolai and Mepraia gajardoi. Parasites Vectors. 2019;12:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3744-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Borzée A, et al. Climate change-based models predict range shifts in the distribution of the only Asian plethodontid salamander: Karsenia koreana. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48310-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garah K, Bentouati A. Using the MaxEnt model for assessing the impact of climate change on the Aurasian Aleppo pine distribution in Algeria. Afr. J. Ecol. 2019;57:500–511. doi: 10.1111/aje.12630. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Adhikari P, et al. Potential impact of climate change on plant invasion in the Republic of Korea. J. Ecol. Environ. 2019;43:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s41610-018-0100-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dawson TP, Jackson ST, House JI, Prentice IC, Mace GM. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science. 2011;332:53–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1200303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (457.1KB, pdf)
Supplementary information2 (2.8KB, csv)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES