Skip to main content
PMC home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2020 Mar 7;2020:2642439. doi: 10.1155/2020/2642439

The Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review

Jun Han 1, Fuqiang Gao 2, Yajia Li 3, Jinhui Ma 2, Wei Sun 1,2,✉, Lijun Shi 4, Xinjie Wu 1, Tengqi Li 1
PMCID: PMC7081027  PMID: 32219128

Abstract

Background

As a pathological process, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is characterized by the avascularity of the femoral head, cellular necrosis, microfracture, and the collapse of the articular surface. Currently, critical treatment for early-stage ONFH is limited to core decompression. However, the efficacy of core decompression remains controversial. To improve the core decompression efficacy, regenerative techniques such as the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were proposed for early-stage ONFH. As a type of autologous plasma containing concentrations of platelets greater than the baseline, PRP plays an important role in tissue repair, regeneration, and the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the operation modes, mechanism, and efficacy of PRP for early-stage ONFH treatment.

Methods

We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. By searching these electronic databases, the identification of either clinical or experimental studies evaluating PRP, MSC, core decompression, and ONFH was our goal.

Results

Seventeen studies of PRP and avascular necrosis of the femoral head were evaluated in our review. Ten studies related to the possible mechanism of PRP for treating ONFH were reviewed. Seven studies of the operation modes of PRP in treating ONFH were identified. We reviewed the efficacy of PRP in treating ONFH systematically and made an attempt to compare the PRP operation modes in 7 studies and other operation modes in past studies for early-stage ONFH treatment.

Conclusion

PRP treats ONFH mainly through three mechanisms: inducing angiogenesis and osteogenesis to accelerate bone healing, inhibiting inflammatory reactions in necrotic lesions, and preventing apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids. In addition, as an adjunctive therapy for core decompression, the use of PRP is recommended to improve the treatment of early-stage ONFH patients, especially when combined with stem cells and bone grafts, by inducing osteogenic activity and stimulating the differentiation of stem cells in necrotic lesions.

1. Introduction

As a pathological process, osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is characterized by avascularity of the femoral head, cellular necrosis, microfracture, and collapse of the articular surface [1–3]. Presently, the pathological mechanism underlying ONFH has not been explained clearly, but the use of glucocorticoids and alcohol is recognized as the most common pathogenic factor [4, 5]. The prevalence of ONFH worldwide is unknown. In China, the overall number of osteonecrosis cases has reached 7 million, and 100,000 to 200,000 new cases of ONFH are diagnosed each year [6]. Meanwhile, it is estimated that 15,000–20,000 new cases of ONFH are diagnosed in the US each year [7]. The incidence of ONFH is increasing, and more patients with ONFH are now diagnosed in the clinic [8, 9].

At present, total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains the most widespread procedure used to treat end-stage ONFH [10]. However, arthroplasty is not a suitable option for patients who are young or with early-stage ONFH because THA reduces the quality of life of patients by restricting the motion of the hip and resulting in some complications. Therefore, young patients who suffer early-stage ONFH tend to choose conservative treatment to avoid or at least delay THA. Currently, core decompression of the hip is the most common conservative treatment for early-stage ONFH, but its cure rate is only 63.5%, and its efficacy remains controversial [11–13]. This is because core decompression is used to decompress the intraosseous pressure and remove necrotic tissue from the hip, but it does not have superior effects on facilitating osteoanagenesis in the necrotic area [14, 15]. For this reason, with the purpose of improving the results of core decompression, regenerative techniques such as the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) have been proposed to address early-stage ONFH [16].

As a specimen of autologous plasma containing platelets at concentrations above the baseline [17], PRP contains growth factors in addition to platelets, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), endothelial growth factor (EGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which have an important effect on tissue repair and the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [16, 18]. The application of PRP in orthopaedics began earlier this decade and has been combined with bone grafts to augment vertebral fusion and fracture treatment [19]. van der Jagt et al. reported that the use of PRP could relieve pain and halt the disease progression of patients with ONFH [20]. Currently, increasing experimental and clinical evidence has shown that PRP may play an effective role in ONFH treatment [21, 22].

In this review, we present a comprehensive overview concerning the operation modes and mechanism of PRP for early-stage ONFH treatment. Then, we present a systemic review of the comparison of PRP with other therapies for treating early-stage ONFH.

2. Materials and Methods

This systemic review was conceived in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for the conduct of systematic reviews and meta analyses of intervention trials (Additional File 1). The review was not prospectively registered because it did not meet the criteria for registration with PROSPERO. Ethical approval of this study was not necessary because it was a systematic review of the accessible literature and any individual patient data were not involved.

2.1. Search Strategy

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched, and we used terms and Boolean operators as follows: “(platelet-rich plasma) AND (avascular necrosis OR aseptic necrosis OR osteonecrosis OR necrosis) AND (femoral head OR hip)”. The search strategies are found in Additional File 2. We did not limit the year of publication, publication status, or language, and there were also no limitations in terms of any particular study design, including randomized or unrandomized control trials, cohort studies, and case reports. Moreover, the references of the articles were also checked manually to identify other potentially relevant literature. We did not search unpublished articles.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria and Study Selection

The studies that met the following criteria were considered eligible: the study enrolled patients with ONFH and the study researched PRP and ONFH. Letters, comments, editorials, and practice guidelines were excluded. Then, the studies were selected independently by 2 of the authors, and any differences in opinion were resolved through discussion with mediation from a third peer if needed (LS, XW, and TL). All information on the included studies is listed in Additional File 2.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

All potential data were extracted and assessed by two reviewers (LS and XW) independently. Discrepancies between the two collaborators were discussed to reach consensus. Data were extracted with respect to participant characteristics, authors, journal, publication date, study design, operation technique, and outcomes for each study included in our review. Participant information included the number, age, and stage of the participants. Information about outcomes was recorded, including scores of pain and function, MRI and X-ray images, conversion to THA, and collapse of the hip. The quality of each of the included articles was assessed using the guidelines of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force by two reviewers (LS and XW).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We first provided a comprehensive overview of the mechanism underlying PRP and its relationship with ONFH treatment in recent years. Then, the data from studies about PRP clinical application were collected, and we categorized the clinical operation modes of PRP into several groups and compared their therapeutic effects with those of other therapies for ONFH treatment systematically. RevMan v5.3 was used to analyze data extracted from included articles. Continuous outcomes were addressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Heterogeneity of articles was estimated by the I2 statistics; substantial heterogeneity was reflected by I2 > 50%. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 69 studies were initially searched within the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases (Figure 1). After the removal of duplicates, title screening, and abstract or full-text screening, 17 studies that researched PRP and ONFH were identified in this review; 10 studies investigated the PRP mechanism, and 7 studies addressed PRP clinical applications. We reviewed the mechanism of PRP and its role in the treatment of ONFH. Then, we systematically reviewed the efficacy of PRP in treating ONFH and attempted to make a comparison of PRP operation modes and other operation modes in past studies used in early-stage ONFH treatment. Data could not be pooled because of the methodological heterogeneity and limited number of the available controlled studies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The selection process of this review.

3.1. The Mechanism of PRP in ONFH Treatment

3.1.1. PRP Accelerates Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis in ONFH

After the use of PRP was verified as a useful management strategy for ONFH treatment by Yokota et al. [23], many clinical and epidemiological studies started to research the mechanism of PRP in ONFH treatment. Numerous studies have reported that enhancing osteogenesis and angiogenesis to reconstruct the bone structure of necrotic areas is the main mechanism involved in early-stage ONFH treatment [1, 24, 25]. In light of the above rationale, PRP could augment core decompression and bone graft substitutes to treat early-stage ONFH through increasing the levels of various cytokines that initiate and regulate proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis [16, 17, 26] (Figure 2). The cytokines identified in PRP include platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), endothelial growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), some of which have been examined efficiently by many researchers. Nakamae et al. reported that combining FGF-2 administration with vascular bundle implantation may enhance the treatment of avascular necrosis in the hips of rabbits [27]. Suzuki et al. reported that VEGF administration increased surgically induced angiogenesis and neovascularization in necrotic bone 1 week after arteriovenous bundle implantation [28]. Yang et al. found that VEGF gene transfection for the treatment of ONFH in rabbits increased bone formation compared to that in the control group, which did not receive VEGF transfection therapy [24]. Several articles have indicated that each growth factor individually induces angiogenesis and osteogenesis. In contrast, some articles reported growth factors that contributed the suppression of osteoanagenesis; the single high-dose administration of TGF-β (335 μg into a humeral canine model) or VEGF (0.5 μg into a rat bone defect) suppressed bone regeneration [29, 30]. Therefore, angiogenesis is a complex process requiring a finely tuned balance between numerous growth factors. Brill et al. reported that the concomitant effect of VEGF and bFGF on the vessel formation process seemed to be more essential than a single VEGF or bFGF administration alone [31]. Thus, PRP could create an optimal environment to increase the repair capacity of ONFH by regulating the interactions of numerous growth factors with different systems.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The mechanism of PRP in ONFH treatment. PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β; bFGF: basic fibroblast growth factor; EGF: endothelial growth factor; IGF: insulin-like growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; IL-17A: interleukin-17A; IL-lβ: interleukin-1β; IL-6: interleukin-6; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-α; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand; Akt: protein kinase B; Bad: Bcl-2-associated death promoter; Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma 2.

With the exception of PRP itself, which contains angiogenic factors, Tong et al. reported that the mRNA expression levels of VEGF, PDGF, IGF-1, and TGF-β in ONFH mice were upregulated tremendously after PRP treatment compared to those in the control group (PBS-treated). PRP may increase the production of angiogenic factors via upregulation of the angiogenic gene pathway, which may contribute to angiogenesis in femoral head osteonecrosis [32].

3.1.2. PRP Treatment Inhibits the Inflammatory Reaction in ONFH

ONFH is associated with synovitis, which is characterized by the presence of inflammatory cells and proinflammatory cytokines in necrotic lesions and synovium [33, 34]. Previous research has found that the synovium is saturated by CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and some CD8+ T cells during ONFH pathogenesis [35]. Some proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-α), and IL-17, are also involved in the pathophysiological process of ONFH [36, 37]. Although the mechanism of ONFH induction is not fully understood, inflammatory cytokines have been reported to be the critical mediators of ONFH pathogenesis according to previous studies [38, 39]. Zou et al. reported a typical positive association between IL-17 and pain severity in ONFH [36].

Tong et al. reported that the mRNA expression and concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-17A and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand (RANKL), were significantly downregulated in the PRP treatment group compared to the control group in synovial cells in a ONFH mouse model [32]. This result indicated that PRP treatment effectively suppressed the expression of IL-17A, IL-1β, TNF-α, and RANKL in ONFH. Interestingly, this study also suggested that PRP treatment upregulated the mRNA expression levels and concentrations of interferon- (IFN-) γ and IL-6 compared with those in synovial cells in the control group. This result indicated that PRP treatment increased IFN-γ and IL-6 levels in ONFH, which is in contradiction with the increase in IL-6 in the local synovium in ONFH and the negative effects of IL-6 on osteoblast differentiation [34, 40]. With regard to the downregulation of IL-6 and IFN-γ, Tong et al. proposed that PRP treatment could promote chondrogenic proliferation and differentiation, which contribute to the production of IL-6 and IFN-γ in the maintenance of the articular cartilage [41, 42].

Overall, PRP treatment downregulates the inflammatory reaction, which may stop ONFH progression and alleviate pain by interrupting the process of inflammatory damage in the joint.

3.1.3. PRP Exosome Treatment Prevents Apoptosis Induced by Glucocorticoids in ONFH

Glucocorticoid use can cause ONFH by inducing cell apoptosis, which accounts for bone loss and angiogenesis impairment [43, 44]. Glucocorticoids modulate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress to induce cell apoptosis. Therefore, if a treatment could prevent cell apoptosis by mediating ER apoptosis, it could reverse the progression of ONFH.

Among the three major signal transduction pathways involved in ER stress, Tao et al. found that the protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) pathway is closely associated with apoptosis [45]. Glucocorticoids activate PERK by phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α). As a downstream protein affected by PERK, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP) suppressed B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) protein expression, after which caspase-3 was cleaved, contributing to cell apoptosis [46, 47].

Tao et al. reported that ER stress-induced apoptosis could be inhibited by PRP exosomes without altering PERK activation and CHOP expression [45]. After adding PRP exosomes to BMSCs (bone mesenchymal stem cells) along with dexamethasone, Akt (protein kinase B) and Bad (Bcl-2-associated death promoter) were phosphorylated, Bcl-2 expression was increased, and cleaved caspase-3 could not be detected. Therefore, Bcl-2 might be a key protein involved in the antiapoptotic effects of PRP exosomes. PRP exosomes inhibited cell apoptosis mainly through the activation of the Akt/Bad/Bcl-2 signalling pathway.

In addition to inhibiting apoptosis induced by dexamethasone, PRP treatment could also reduce the toxic effects of dexamethasone directly. Tong et al. found that a reduction in the serological levels of antiglucocorticoid IgG occurred in PRP-treated ONFH mice compared with the control group, which indicated that the humoural glucocorticoid concentration was decreased by PRP [32].

3.2. The Applications of PRP in ONFH Treatment

3.2.1. Combination of PRP with Stem Cells to Treat ONFH

Houdek et al. conducted a prospective study based on 22 early-stage ONFH participants in the Mayo Clinic, who were treated with PRP combined with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BmMSCs) after core decompression, and observed that more than 93% of the patients did not suffer from femoral head collapse, and 84% of the patients did not exhibit conversion to THA at a 3-year follow up (Table 1). Additionally, this study demonstrated that the mean modified Kerboul angle of the necrotic lesions improved from 205° ± 47° to 172° ± 48° according to a 12-month postoperative MRI assessment, which indicated a reduced risk of progressing to collapse [48, 49]. MSCs are capable of enhancing tissue regeneration by differentiating into various mesenchymal phenotypes, such as [50] osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. When MSCs are combined with PRP to treat ONFH, the necessary growth factors in PRP could promote the potential of MSCs to differentiate into new bone and blood vessels. Thus, PRP enhances the osteoanagenic effect of MSCs to improve the healing of early-stage ONFH.

Table 1.

Detailed description of the 7 studies about PRP clinical application in the systematic review.

Author Level of evidence Patient/hip treated Age (years) Staging Technique Follow-up Hip survivorship (%)
Houdek et al. [48] Level II prospective descriptive study 22/35 43 Steinberg stage I, II PRP/BmMSCs/core decompression 36 months 90%
Pak [52] Level V case report 2/2 29, 47 Stage IV PRP/AdMSC mixture under ultrasound guidance 3 months 100%
Pak [51] Level V case report 2/2 34, 39 Stage IV PRP/AdMSC mixture under ultrasound guidance 16 months 100%
Pak et al. [53] Level V case report 1/1 43 Ficat classification stage I PRP/AdMSC mixture under ultrasound guidance 21 months 100%
Guadilla et al. [55] Level V case report 4/4 / Steinberg stage IIa, IIb PRP/autologous bone grafting/core decompression through arthroscopy 14 months 100%
Samy [56] Level II prospective descriptive study 30/40 36.7 Modified Ficat classification stages IIb and III PRP/autologous bone grafting/core decompression 41.4 months 90%
D'Ambrosi et al. [58] Level II prospective descriptive study 16/24 42 All the Ficat classification PRP/MSCs/synthetic bone graft/core decompression 75 months 50% (80% for early patients and 28.6% for late patients)
Open in a new tab

PRP: platelet-rich plasma; BmMSCs: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; AdMSCs: adipose-derived MSCs.

In addition to BmMSCs, PRP combined with adipose-derived MSCs (AdMSCs) has also been used for ONFH treatment. Due to the limited number of surgical cases receiving treatment with PRP and AdMSCs, none of the studies utilizing large sample volumes has systematically evaluated its therapeutic effects thus far. Pak published two case reports for 4 patients with stage IV ONFH who received treatment by the injection of a PRP/AdMSC mixture into the femoral head under ultrasound guidance, which showed the long-term improvement in pain and motion range and the regeneration of bone by MRI for at least 7 to 12 months [51, 52]. In another case report from Pak et al. [53], one patient with stage I ONFH received PRP/AdMSC mixture treatment once and PRP treatment every week for 4 weeks for subsequent treatment. Eventually, this patient displayed the complete resolution of hip pain and motion function abnormalities at a 21-month follow-up, and MRI showed significant signal changes in both the T1 and T2 views of the femoral head before and after PRP/AdMSC treatment. This is the first complete resolution of ONFH via treatment with the injection of PRP/AdMSCs percutaneously.

The combination of AdMSCs and PRP may produce improved therapeutic effects for ONFH than BmMSC/PRP treatment. The concentration of AdMSCs (approximately 200,000/g) was higher than that of BmMSCs (approximately 6000-60,000/g) [53], and the source of BmMSCs was restricted by certain diseases, such as osteoporosis and leucocythemia [54]. The study from Pak et al. also supported the use of AdMSCs, suggesting that AdMSCs show greater potency in promoting regeneration and osteogenic differentiation than BmMSCs in the treatment of osteonecrosis [53].

3.2.2. PRP Combined with Synthetic or Autologous Bone Grafts for the Treatment of ONFH after Core Decompression

Currently, there are only three articles that have reported the use of PRP combined with bone grafts to treat ONFH during core decompression surgery. The three articles all showed significant outcomes for the treatment of ONFH, particularly for early-stage patients.

Guadilla et al. enrolled one patient with Grade IIA ONFH and three patients with Grade IIB ONFH who were treated with PRP and autologous bone grafting after core decompression through arthroscopy. The four patients all exhibited a significant reduction in the visual analogue score (VAS) and were restored to a normal life state in the fifth month. A significant improvement in symptoms was observed during the early follow-up process, and representative bone formation was observed by MRI soon afterwards. Considering the limits in terms of the patient number and the lack of advanced ONFH patients, this study cannot provide sufficient evidence to support PRP treatment [55]. Samy conducted a prospective study of 40 hips (30 patients) in modified Ficat stages IIb and III ONFH that were treated with an operation procedure consisting of core decompression, a composite iliac bone graft, and PRP [56]. Significant pain relief was reported in 34 hips (85%), and the Harris hip score (HHS) was improved from 46.0 ± 7.8 preoperatively to 90.28 ± 19 postoperatively at a 4-year follow-up. This result was much better than that of a study without PRP reported by Mont et al., who used the technique of core decompression and iliac bone graft [57]. D'Ambrosi et al. evaluated 24 hips in 16 patients, which included all Ficat classification stages, treated by core decompression, the injection of PRP and MSCs, and synthetic bone grafts [58]. Clinical failure was defined as receiving THA by 75 months of follow-up. The total survivorship of this operation is 50%. The survival rate was 80% for patients in stage I+II and 28.6% for patients in stage III+IV. In comparison with stage I and II patients, the patients in stages III and IV suffered a higher rate of failure for the operation.

3.3. Effectiveness of PRP in comparison to Other Treatments in Treating ONFH

Currently, the use of PRP to treat ONFH is just beginning to be utilized, and there are few articles describing the study of PRP efficacy in treating ONFH. The total number of articles that could be retrieved included 4 case reports and 3 self-controlled studies. Moreover, the main function of PRP is as an adjuvant substitute for core decompression to treat ONFH. For this reason, we reviewed articles to make a comparison between previous modes of core decompression and the use of PRP in combination with core decompression.

To improve bone regeneration, the application of core decompression in association with stem cells is an appealing possibility. Hernigou and his colleagues are the pioneers in applying stem cells to ONFH treatment. They conducted a prospective study of 189 hips in 116 patients receiving core decompression and autologous BmMSC grafts. At the 5- to 10-year follow-up, THA was necessary for 9 of 145 hips with early-stage ONFH (Steinberg stage I and stage II), which indicated a high 95% success rate [59]. However, the Hernigou study defined Steinberg stage II as a hip with an abnormal MRI scan and an abnormal radiograph in a patient presenting with sclerosis or cystic lesions within the femoral head but without a crescent line, which was equivalent to the stage in between the actual Steinberg stage I and II classifications [60]. Thus, the strict selection of early patients contributed to the high success rate. Several studies discovered that the survivorship rate free from collapse for early-stage patients who received core decompression combined with MSC was 85%~90% 24~60 months after follow-up [61, 62]. All the aforementioned studies agree that core decompression associated with stem cells can improve postoperative outcomes compared to core decompression alone. What would be the results from combining PRP with core decompression and stem cells? Houdek et al. applied PRP in combination with BmMSCs and core decompression to the treatment of early-stage ONFH in 31 hips in 22 patients (Steinberg stage I and stage II), which revealed that more than 93% and 84% of patients did not progress to femoral head collapse and received THA 36 months after follow-up, respectively [48]. Houdek et al. also analyzed the BmMSC content of bone marrow concentrate (BMC) by testing the nucleated cell quantity and colony-forming units (CFUs), which revealed that patients who received a higher mean number of CFUs and a higher mean concentration of nucleated cells per millilitre of BMCs were more likely to not need repeated surgical procedures (THA or decompression). In addition, this study showed that 80% of patients classified as high risk (modified Kerboul Grades 3 and 4) received repeated surgical procedures (THA or core decompression), while none of low-risk (modified Kerboul Grades 1 and 2) patients suffered hip collapse [48, 49].

By simply comparing the outcomes between the studies by Hernigou et al. and Houdek et al., it was revealed that for preserving femoral head integrity, the curative effect of combining PRP with BmMSCs and core decompression was similar to that of combining BmMSCs and core decompression for treating early-stage ONFH. However, when considering the strict selection of patients in the Hernigou et al. study, which excluded patients with crescent signs, PRP indeed could augment the curative effects of combining BmMSCs and core decompression for early-stage ONFH.

By considering the use of synthetic or autologous bone grafts to augment core decompression, Rosenwasser et al. revealed a significant clinical hip protection rate (85%) in 15 hips in 13 patients with stages II and III ONFH during 10-15 years of follow-up [63]. Wang et al. evaluated 110 patients (138 hips) with stage ARCO IIA–IIIA ONFH treated with core decompression combined with a mixture of autologous bone and demineralized bone matrix. The definition of clinical failure was a Harris hip score below 80 points or the necessity for further surgical procedures (THA or osteotomy). In conclusion, the study reported an 85% survivorship rate in stages IIA and IIB during 25 months of follow-up [64]. However, some studies have produced the exact opposite results for core decompression combined with bone graft. Yu et al. enrolled 18 patients with 19 hips (stage IIC: 6 hips, stage IIIA: 13 hips) who were treated with core decompression combined with synthetic bone grafts. The definition of clinical failure was conversion to THA or the progression of head collapse. In the end, 3 stage IIC hips and 8 stage IIIA hips were converted to total hip replacement at a mean time point of 8.5 months postoperatively. The other six hips progressed to collapse of the femoral head. Only two hips (10.5%) were free of progression to collapse during long-term follow-up (5 years) [65]. The above results suggest that the efficacy of synthetic or autologous bone grafts combined with core decompression has been debatable so far. According to the published articles, the use of a mixture of PRP and autologous bone in the core decompression track showed improved results versus the results of grafting bone alone. Samy performed an operation procedure using core decompression, composite iliac bone grafts, and PRP on 30 ONFH patients with 16 stage IIb hips and 24 stage III hips, which were graded according to the modified Ficat classification, and 90% of patients were free from THA at 4 years of follow-up [56]. Guadilla et al. treated 4 patients with Grade IIA and IIB ONFH with PRP and autologous bone grafting after core decompression, which showed that cartilage integrity in the 4 patients was preserved for an average of 14 months of follow-up [55].

These results suggested that bone grafting combined with a mixture of PRP and MSCs could theoretically have effects on improving the success rate of decompression. Bone grafting provides provisional mechanical support after removing the necrotic lesion, while PRP stimulates the differentiation of MSCs and plays a crucial role in osteogenesis and angiogenesis to induce bone healing. However, similar to the results of other studies of core decompression [66–68], PRP was not shown to be an effective method for treating advanced stage ONFH. D'Ambrosi examined 24 hips in 16 patients from all Ficat classification stages that were treated by core decompression and an injection of a mixture of synthetic bone, PRP, and MSCs. The survival rate was 80% in early-stage patients; however, only 28.6% of patients in the advanced stage survived the collapse [58]. Therefore, for treating early-stage ONFH, the outcomes of core decompression may be improved by combining PRP with other regenerative therapies, but PRP is not suitable for advanced stage ONFH or necrotic lesions larger than 50% [69]. This was verified by the research conducted by Yoon et al., which determined the importance of both the Ficat stage and lesion size in ONFH treatment [70].

4. Conclusion

Currently, PRP is a possible treatment for various medical problems that may stimulate and accelerate soft-tissue healing and regeneration [19, 71]. In particular, in the treatment of bone nonunion and diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers, many clinical studies have produced satisfactory results or results that are even better than the standard of care [72–74]. However, for the treatment of ONFH, PRP alone will not work very well to treat ONFH. Because ONFH is characterized by osteocyte apoptosis as a consequence of the interruption of the blood supply, the most important steps for treating ONFH are facilitating osteogenesis and angiogenesis and restoring bone formation to reconstruct the support at the joint surface. PRP must be administered in association with core decompression and other treatments to play its role.

In summary, PRP could not reverse the pathophysiological course of ONFH; however, PRP is recommended as an adjunctive therapy for core decompression combined with stem cells and bone grafts (autologous or allogeneic) to induce osteogenic activity and stimulate the differentiation of stem cells in ARCO stage I and II patients (the Association of Research of Osseous Circulation) [58]. PRP works mainly through three mechanisms: inducing angiogenesis and osteogenesis to accelerate bone healing, inhibiting inflammatory reactions in necrotic lesions, and preventing apoptosis induced by glucocorticoids. The use of PRP in combination with other techniques may show potent efficacy in treating ONFH, and this treatment method may become more popular. However, further prospective randomized clinical trials of PRP are needed to determine its efficacy; the use of a standardized preparation and the ratio of stem cells used for the therapeutic algorithm must be investigated in the future.

In general, our review also showed various limitations that should not be ignored. First, the number of included studies that could be found was relatively small. In total, 7 studies evaluated the efficacy of different operation modes of PRP; 3 articles described prospective studies, and the other 4 studies described case reports, all of which showed a low level of evidence-based medical classification. Second, there were no uniform standards for the operation procedure and the curative effect evaluation of PRP among the articles, which resulted in high heterogeneity in this study. In addition, there may be publication biases that affect every included article reporting good results.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7174346, 7182146, and 7204301), the Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH2018-4-40611), the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (No. Z181100001718058), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672236, 81802224, and 81871830), and the China-Japan Friendship Hospital Project (2018-1-QN-9).

Abbreviations

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

ONFH:

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head

MSCs:

Mesenchymal stem cells

BmMSCs:

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells

AdMSCs:

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells

HHS:

Harris hip score

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

PDGF:

Platelet-derived growth factor

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor-β

bFGF:

Basic fibroblast growth factor

EGF:

Endothelial growth factor

IGF:

Insulin-like growth factor

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

IL-17A:

Interleukin-17A

IL-lβ:

Interleukin-1β

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

PERK:

Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

eIF2α:

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α

RANKL:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand

Akt:

Protein kinase B

Bad:

Bcl-2-associated death promoter

Bcl-2:

B-cell lymphoma 2

CHOP:

CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein

VAS:

Visual analogue score

BMC:

Bone marrow concentrate

CFUs:

Colony-forming units

ARCO:

Association Research Circulation Osseous.

Disclosure

Jun Han, Fuqiang Gao, and Yajia Li are joint first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' Contributions

LS, XW, and TL searched the materials and analyzed the data. SW designed the study program. JH and FG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Moya-Angeler J., Gianakos A. L., Villa J. C., Ni A., Lane J. M. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015;6(8):590–601. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Herndon J. H., Aufranc O. E. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in the adult. A review of its incidence in a variety of conditions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1972;86:43–62. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197207000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mwale F., Wang H., Johnson A. J., Mont M. A., Antoniou J. Abnormal vascular endothelial growth factor expression in mesenchymal stem cells from both osteonecrotic and osteoarthritic hips. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2011;69:S56–S61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Atik O. S. Overuse and abuse of cortisone. Eklem Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi. 2017;28(1):p. 1. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.00056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mont M. A., Zywiel M. G., Marker D. R., McGrath M. S., Delanois R. E. The natural history of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic literature review. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2010;92(12):2165–2170. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yin J.-M., Liu Z., Zhao S.-C., Guo Y.-J., Liu Z.-T. Relationship between the Apolipoprotein AI, B gene polymorphism and the risk of non-traumatic osteonecrosis. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2014;13(1):p. 149. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jones K. B., Seshadri T., Krantz R., Keating A., Ferguson P. C. Cell-based therapies for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2008;14(10):1081–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kianmehr N., Bidari A., Mofidi M., Bahar N. Silent osteonecrosis of the femoral head following high-dose corticosteroids in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2015;29:p. 259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jin H., Xu T., Chen Q., et al. The fate and distribution of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with intra-arterial infusion in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in dogs. Stem Cells International. 2016;2016:10. doi: 10.1155/2016/8616143.8616143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mont M. A., Cherian J. J., Sierra R. J., Jones L. C., Lieberman J. R. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? A ten-year update. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2015;97(19):1604–1627. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mont M. A., Carbone J. J., Fairbank A. C. Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996;324:169–178. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koo K. H., Kim R., Ko G. H., Song H. R., Jeong S. T., Cho S. H. Preventing collapse in early osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A randomised clinical trial of core decompression. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. 1995;77-B(6):870–874. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B6.7593097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stulberg B. N., Davis A. W., Bauer T. W., Levine M., Easley K. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A prospective randomized treatment protocol. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1991;268:140–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tabatabaee R. M., Saberi S., Parvizi J., Mortazavi S. M., Farzan M. Combining concentrated autologous bone marrow stem cells injection with core decompression improves outcome for patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative study. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9 Suppl):11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Calori G. M., Mazza E., Colombo M., Mazzola S., Mineo G. V., Giannoudis P. V. Treatment of AVN using the induction chamber technique and a biological-based approach: indications and clinical results. Injury. 2014;45(2):369–373. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rackwitz L., Eden L., Reppenhagen S., et al. Stem cell- and growth factor-based regenerative therapies for avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2012;3(1):p. 7. doi: 10.1186/scrt98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eppley B. L., Woodell J. E., Higgins J. Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet-rich plasma: implications for wound healing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2004;114(6):1502–1508. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000138251.07040.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kuroda Y., Asada R., So K., et al. A pilot study of regenerative therapy using controlled release of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor for patients with pre-collapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head. International Orthopaedics. 2016;40(8):1747–1754. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hall M. P., Band P. A., Meislin R. J., Jazrawi L. M., Cardone D. A. Platelet-rich plasma: current concepts and application in sports medicine. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2009;17(10):602–608. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200910000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van der Jagt D., Mokete L., Pietrzak J., Zalavras C. G., Lieberman J. R. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: evaluation and treatment. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015;23(2):69–70. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Peng H., Wright V., Usas A., et al. Synergistic enhancement of bone formation and healing by stem cell-expressed VEGF and bone morphogenetic protein-4. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;110(6):751–759. doi: 10.1172/JCI15153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carano R. A., Filvaroff E. H. Angiogenesis and bone repair. Drug Discovery Today. 2003;8(21):980–989. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02866-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yokota K., Ishida O., Sunagawa T., Suzuki O., Nakamae A., Ochi M. Platelet-rich plasma accelerated surgical angio-genesis in vascular-implanted necrotic bone: an experimental study in rabbits. Acta Orthopaedica. 2008;79(1):106–110. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang C., Yang S., Du J., Li J., Xu W., Xiong Y. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfection to enhance the repair of avascular necrosis of the femoral head of rabbit. Chinese Medical Journal. 2003;116(10):1544–1548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J., Liu W., Cao Y., et al. MMP-3 and MMP-8 single-nucleotide polymorphisms are related to alcohol-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in Chinese males. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25177–25188. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Radke S., Battmann A., Jatzke S., Eulert J., Jakob F., Schutze N. Expression of the angiomatrix and angiogenic proteins CYR61, CTGF, and VEGF in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2006;24(5):945–952. doi: 10.1002/jor.20097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nakamae A., Sunagawa T., Ishida O., et al. Acceleration of surgical angiogenesis in necrotic bone with a single injection of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2004;22(3):509–513. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Suzuki O., Bishop A. T., Sunagawa T., Katsube K., Friedrich P. F. VEGF-promoted surgical angiogenesis in necrotic bone. Microsurgery. 2004;24(1):85–91. doi: 10.1002/micr.10190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Broderick E., Infanger S., Turner T. M., Sumner D. R. Inhibition of bone mineralization following high dose TGFβ 1 application. New Orleans, LA: Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harten R. D., Svach D. J. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits DBM induced bone formation. New Orleans, LA: Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic Research Society; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brill A., Elinav H., Varon D. Differential role of platelet granular mediators in angiogenesis. Cardiovascular Research. 2004;63(2):226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tong S., Yin J., Liu J. Platelet-rich plasma has beneficial effects in mice with osteonecrosis of the femoral head by promoting angiogenesis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2018;15(2):1781–1788. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kamiya N., Yamaguchi R., Adapala N. S., et al. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease produces chronic hip synovitis and elevation of interleukin-6 in the synovial fluid. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2015;30(6):1009–1013. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yamaguchi R., Kamiya N., Adapala N. S., Drissi H., Kim H. K. HIF-1-dependent IL-6 activation in articular chondrocytes initiating synovitis in femoral head ischemic osteonecrosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2016;98(13):1122–1131. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rabquer B. J., Tan G. J., Shaheen P. J., Haines G. K., III, Urquhart A. G., Koch A. E. Synovial inflammation in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clinical and Translational Science. 2009;2(4):273–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zou D., Zhang K., Yang Y., et al. Th17 and IL-17 exhibit higher levels in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and have a positive correlation with severity of pain. Endokrynologia Polska. 2018;69(3):283–290. doi: 10.5603/EP.a2018.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adapala N. S., Yamaguchi R., Phipps M., Aruwajoye O., Kim H. K. W. Necrotic bone stimulates proinflammatory responses in macrophages through the activation of toll-like receptor 4. The American Journal of Pathology. 2016;186(11):2987–2999. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chiu W. C., Lai Y. P., Chou M. Y. Humanization and characterization of an anti-human TNF-α murine monoclonal antibody. PLoS One. 2011;6(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hodge J. A., Kawabata T. T., Krishnaswami S., et al. The mechanism of action of tofacitinib - an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2016;34(2):318–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kaneshiro S., Ebina K., Shi K., et al. IL-6 negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation through the SHP2/MEK2 and SHP2/Akt2 pathways in vitro. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. 2014;32(4):378–392. doi: 10.1007/s00774-013-0514-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bai F., Tian H., Niu Z., et al. Chimeric anti-IL-17 full-length monoclonal antibody is a novel potential candidate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2014;33(3):711–721. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Suzuki M., Tetsuka T., Yoshida S., et al. The role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in IL-6 and IL-8 production from the TNF-alpha- or IL-1beta-stimulated rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts. FEBS Letters. 2000;465(1):23–27. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01717-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jilka R. L., Weinstein R. S., Bellido T., Roberson P., Parfitt A. M., Manolagas S. C. Increased bone formation by prevention of osteoblast apoptosis with parathyroid hormone. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1999;104(4):439–446. doi: 10.1172/JCI6610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Plotkin L. I., Manolagas S. C., Bellido T. Glucocorticoids induce osteocyte apoptosis by blocking focal adhesion kinase-mediated survival. Evidence for inside-out signaling leading to anoikis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(33):24120–24130. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611435200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tao S. C., Yuan T., Rui B. Y., Zhu Z. Z., Guo S. C., Zhang C. Q. Exosomes derived from human platelet-rich plasma prevent apoptosis induced by glucocorticoid-associated endoplasmic reticulum stress in rat osteonecrosis of the femoral head via the Akt/Bad/Bcl-2 signal pathway. Theranostics. 2017;7(3):733–750. doi: 10.7150/thno.17450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mihailidou C., Panagiotou C., Kiaris H., Kassi E., Moutsatsou P. Crosstalk between C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and glucocorticoid receptor in lung cancer. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2016;436:211–223. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Holmes A., Abraham D. J., Sa S., Shiwen X., Black C. M., Leask A. CTGF and SMADs, maintenance of scleroderma phenotype is independent of SMAD signaling. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2001;276(14):10594–10601. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010149200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Houdek M. T., Wyles C. C., Collins M. S., et al. Stem cells combined with platelet-rich plasma effectively treat corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the hip: a prospective study. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2018;476(2):388–397. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ha Y. C., Jung W. H., Kim J. R., Seong N. H., Kim S. Y., Koo K. H. Prediction of collapse in femoral head osteonecrosis: a modified Kerboul method with use of magnetic resonance images. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 2006;88:35–40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Baksh D., Song L., Tuan R. S. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 2004;8(3):301–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00320.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pak J. Autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce persistent bone-like tissue in osteonecrotic femoral heads. Pain Physician. 2012;15(1):75–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pak J. Regeneration of human bones in hip osteonecrosis and human cartilage in knee osteoarthritis with autologous adipose-tissue-derived stem cells: a case series. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2011;5(1) doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pak J., Lee J. H., Jeon J. H., Lee S. H. Complete resolution of avascular necrosis of the human femoral head treated with adipose tissue-derived stem cells and platelet-rich plasma. The Journal of International Medical Research. 2014;42(6):1353–1362. doi: 10.1177/0300060514546940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Giannoudis P., Tzioupis C., Almalki T., Buckley R. Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: Is it really different?: A basic science perspective. Injury. 2007;38(1):S90–S99. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guadilla J., Fiz N., Andia I., Sanchez M. Arthroscopic management and platelet-rich plasma therapy for avascular necrosis of the hip. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012;20(2):393–398. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1587-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Samy A. M. Management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a novel technique. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016;50(4):359–365. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.185590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mont M. A., Einhorn T. A., Sponseller P. D., Hungerford D. S. The trapdoor procedure using autogenous cortical and cancellous bone grafts for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. 1998;80-B(1):56–62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.D'Ambrosi R., Biancardi E., Massari G., Ragone V., Facchini R. M. Survival analysis after core decompression in association with platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells, and synthetic bone graft in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Joints. 2018;6(1):16–22. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hernigou P., Beaujean F. Treatment of osteonecrosis with autologous bone marrow grafting. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2002;405:14–23. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200212000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Steinberg M. E., Hayken G. D., Steinberg D. R. A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 1995;77-B(1):34–41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.77B1.7822393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gangji V., De Maertelaer V., Hauzeur J. P. Autologous bone marrow cell implantation in the treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: five year follow-up of a prospective controlled study. Bone. 2011;49(5):1005–1009. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gangji V., Hauzeur J. P., Matos C., De Maertelaer V., Toungouz M., Lambermont M. Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with implantation of autologous bone-marrow cells. A pilot study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 2004;86-A(6):1153–1160. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200406000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rosenwasser M. P., Garino J. P., Kiernan H. A., Michelsen C. B. Long term followup of thorough debridement and cancellous bone grafting of the femoral head for avascular necrosis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994;306:17–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang B. L., Sun W., Shi Z. C., et al. Treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head using bone impaction grafting through a femoral neck window. International Orthopaedics. 2010;34(5):635–639. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0822-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yu P. A., Peng K. T., Huang T. W., Hsu R. W., Hsu W. H., Lee M. S. Injectable synthetic bone graft substitute combined with core decompression in the treatment of advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a 5-year follow-up. Biomedical Journal. 2015;38(3):257–261. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.138307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Amanatullah D. F., Strauss E. J., Di Cesare P. E. Current management options for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: part 1, diagnosis and nonoperative management. American Journal of Orthopedics. 2011;40(9):E186–E192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zalavras C. G., Lieberman J. R. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: evaluation and treatment. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014;22(7):455–464. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Castro F. P., Jr., Barrack R. L. Core decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthopedics. 2000;29(3):187–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rajagopal M., Balch Samora J., Ellis T. J. Efficacy of core decompression as treatment for osteonecrosis of the hip: a systematic review. Hip International. 2012;22(5):489–493. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yoon T. R., Song E. K., Rowe S. M., Park C. H. Failure after core decompression in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. International Orthopaedics. 2001;24(6):316–318. doi: 10.1007/s002640000186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ahmad Z., Howard D., Brooks R. A., et al. The role of platelet rich plasma in musculoskeletal science. JRSM Short Reports. 2012;3(6):p. 40. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kitoh H., Kitakoji T., Tsuchiya H., Katoh M., Ishiguro N. Transplantation of culture expanded bone marrow cells and platelet rich plasma in distraction osteogenesis of the long bones. Bone. 2007;40(2):522–528. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dallari D., Fini M., Stagni C., et al. In vivo study on the healing of bone defects treated with bone marrow stromal cells, platelet-rich plasma, and freeze-dried bone allografts, alone and in combination. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2006;24(5):877–888. doi: 10.1002/jor.20112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Margolis D. J., Kantor J., Santanna J., Strom B. L., Berlin J. A. Effectiveness of platelet releasate for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):483–488. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES