Abstract
Botulinum-toxin A (BoNT/A) is a widely used not only for cosmetics but also for various experimental purposes including muscle-related research. In this study, we applied BoNT/A to mouse muscle of three different sources to compare and evaluate the biological and pathological response. The three different mouse sources consist of Korl:ICR (Korea FDA source), A:ICR (USA source) and B:ICR (Japan source) which were purchased from each different vendors. To compare the responses of ICR mice with BoNT/A muscle injection, we examined the body weight, hematological and serum biochemistry analysis. Also, we evaluated the muscle change by histopathological analysis and gene expression patterns of muscle-related target by qPCR. The body weight gain was decreased in the BoNT/A-treated group compared with the control group. In clinical pathologic analysis and gene expression patterns, the data showed that the responses in the BoNT/A-treated group were similar compared with the control group. Decreased muscle fiber was observed in BoNT/A-treated group compared with control group, while Korl:ICR showed a little low response with the other mouse sources. In conclusion, our results suggest that three different sources ICR mice (Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR) have a similar biological and pathological responses in BoNT/A muscle injection.
Keywords: Korl:ICR, Botulinum toxin, Muscle, ICR mouse
Introduction
Botulinum toxin is known to be one of the most potent toxins in nature [1, 2]. Due to its potent toxicity, it has been classified as a highest priority bioterrorism agent by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [3]. Human casualties due to botulinum toxin are reported every year. On the other hand, botulinum toxin is used to treat several diseases including strabismus, urinary incontinence, anal fissure, cervical dystonia, migraine headaches [4–8], and a variety of other diseases [9]. Botulinum toxin is also one of the most commonly used materials in the field of plastic surgery, constituting a billion-dollar industry [10].
Botulinum toxin is a type of protein released by a bacterium known as Clostridium botulinum; it acts by reversibly binding to nerves synapses, inhibiting the release of acetylcholine at nerve junctions [11]. This blocks muscle contractions, resulting in secondary muscle relaxation effects, this property has been exploited in the treatment of muscle tension-related diseases [9].
Botulinum toxin is classified into eight subtypes (A, B, C1, C2, D, E, F and G) based on immunological characteristics [12]. Type A is widely used because it is the most effective [12]. Previous studies have reported the purification [13] of botulinum-toxin A (BoNT/A) and its amino acid composition [14].
Outbred mice and rat stocks are widely used in research and industry. The ICR mice, also known as Swiss mice, were originated from albino mice in Switzerland, and were established at Institute for Cancer Research [15]. Rodents, including ICR mice, have been commonly used as animal models over a prolonged period. BoNT/A potency tests are done using rodents, especially ICR mice [16–18], and include toxicity, nerve, muscle and biological response tests [19–22]. Among laboratory animals, ICR mice are the most commonly used models.
In the present study, we compared the effects of BoNT/A muscle injection in ICR mice obtained from three different sources (Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR). Further, we evaluated the response and phenotype in Korl:ICR mice, established by the Korea FDA. Our results are the first evidence showing that Korl: ICR, A;ICR, and B:ICR mice have largely similar responses to BoNT/A muscle injection.
Methods/experimental
Animals
Male ICR mice (six-week-old) were obtained from three different sources. The ICR mice were purchased from different vendors located in Korea (Korl:ICR), the United States (A:ICR) and Japan (B:ICR). The animal experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of KPC Co. Ltd. Kyunggido, korea (KPC-IACUC; approval No. P181112) and were in accordance with their guidelines. All mice were provided with ad libitum access to a standard irradiated chow diet (Purina, Seoul. Korea) and sterilized water. During the study period, the mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions under a strict light cycle (light on at 7:00 and off at 19:00, 12-h dark-light cycle), 23 ± 2 °C, and (50 ± 10%) relative humidity at the laboratory animal facility of KPC.
Experimental design
The three types of mice (Korl:ICR, A:ICR, and B:ICR) were each divided into two groups (negative control group and botulinum toxin-induced group; n = 10 in each group). Before the experiment, all mice were acclimatized for 7 days. Botulinum-toxin A (BoNT/A, Botox, 100 U, Allergan, Irvine, CA) was injected into the botulinum toxin-induced group mice and saline into the negative control group mice. The left hind limbs were shaved and a single injection of 1.0 U/kg BoNT/A into the gastrocnemius muscle. Body weight was measured daily for 3 days using an electrical balance (FX-2000i, AND, Japan). After the experiment, all mice were anesthetized using 2% isoflurane (Virbac, UK) in a chamber. Blood samples were collected from the abdominal aorta and stored into a BD Microtainer Blood Collection Tube (BD Life Sciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for hematology and serum biochemistry analysis. The muscle tissues were extracted for histopathology analysis.
Serum biochemistry analysis
For serum biochemistry analysis, the collected blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 15~20 min for serum isolation. Levels of a total of 20 markers were tested including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE), glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (CHO), total protein (TP), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TBIL), triglyceride (TG), calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphorus (IP), sodium (Na), potassium (K), chloride (Cl), phospholipid (PL) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The analysis was measured by automated biochemistry analyzer (TBA-120FR, Toshiba, Japan).
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted from mouse muscle samples using the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s standard protocol. The concentration of extracted RNA was evaluated using a Nanodrop 2000 (ThermoScientific, USA). cDNA was prepared from total RNA via reverse transcription using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) and oligo dT primers (Invitrogen, USA). Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed by mixing cDNA with primers and LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). qRT-PCR was performed using an LightCycler 480 II with supplied software (Roche applied science, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA expression levels were compared after normalization to endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA levels. The primer sequences used are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
List of PCR primers
| Genes | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| Gapdh | TGGAGAAACCTGCCAAGTATG | GGAGACAACCTGGTCCTCAG |
| Col1a1 | TGGTGACAAGGGTGAGACAG | CAGGAGAACCAGGAGAACCA |
| Il-6 | CCGGAGAGGAGACTTCACAG | TGCCATTGCACAACTCTTTT |
| Tgf-b1 | AGTGGCTGAACCAAGGAGAC | GCTGATCCCGTTGATTTCC |
| Mmp-2 | ACACTGGGACCTGTCACTCC | CCAAATAAACCGGTCCTTGA |
| MHCIIA | GCAAACACGAGAGACGAGTG | ATTGTTCCTCAGCCTCCTCA |
| MHCIIB | GGAATGCTGAAGGACACACA | TCTGTCTGTTCCAGGGATGC |
| MHCIIX | GGAGATAAAGGCCAAGAGTGC | AGCCTTGGCTTCCTGTTCTT |
Hematological analysis
The collected whole blood samples were used for hematological analysis. A total of nine parameters were assessed including red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet (PLT), reticulocyte (RET) and white blood cell (WBC). The analysis was measured by automated hematological analyzer (ADVIA2120i, Siemens, Germany).
Histopathological analysis
Following the experiments, the muscles were harvested from the mice and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for 1 week. The fixed tissues were embedded in a paraffin block and sectioned into 4-μm-thick section. The sections were mounted on slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) solution. The stained slides were observed under a light microscope (TE2000, Nikon, Japan). For histopathology image analysis, the image analyzer software Image J (NIH) was used.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed with Student’s t-tests using Excel (Microsoft, USA) and were represented as mean ± standard error in graphical plots. Statistically significant differences are indicated using asterisks (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
Results
Body weight
To compare changes in body weight during the experiment period, we measured the body weight for 3 days (Fig. 1). At the beginning of the experiment, the mice had similar body weights. Normal ICR mice (negative control groups) showed continuous and constant weight gain for 3 days during the experiment. On day 3, mice in the BoNT/A-treated groups had decreased body weight, although the differences were not significant compared to the negative control groups. This data showed that the BoNT/A-treated mice experienced a weight loss of approximately 4% compared to the negative control groups. Overall, weight loss in the BoNT/A-treated groups was found to be the same across mice originating from the three different sources.
Fig. 1.
Body weight changes in BoNT/A muscle injection with ICR mice from three different sources for 3 days. The data represent the mean ± SD (n = 10/group)
Clinical pathology analysis
For clinical pathology evaluations, we conducted hematology and serum biochemistry analyses. In hematological evaluation, we analyzed a total of 10 parameters including RBC levels and compared them between the negative control groups and the BoNT/A-treated groups (Table 2). The MCV and MCH levels in the BoNT/A-treated groups were significantly higher than those in the negative control groups in mice from all three sources. The RBC, HGB, and HCT levels in the BoNT/A-treated groups were significantly lower than those in the negative control groups in mcie from all three sources. The MCHC, PLT, and WBC levels in the BoNT/A-treated groups were significantly different from those in the negative control groups in A:ICR and B:ICR mice. In terms of serum biochemistry, a total of 20 serum parameters were measured including AST and compared between the negative control groups and BoNT/A-treated groups (Table 3). The Na, K, CRE, ALP, HDL, and PL levels in the BoNT/A-treated groups were significantly lower than those in the negative control groups in mice from all three sources. The LDL level in the BoNT/A-treated groups was significantly higher than that in negative control groups in mice from all three sources. In addition, there were significant changes in several parameters with the patterns differing based on the source of the mice.
Table 2.
Hematological analysis of Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR with BoNT/A muscle treatment
| Parameters/Groups | Con-Korl:ICR | Treated-Korl:ICR | Con-A:ICR | Treated-A:ICR | Con-B:ICR | Treated-B:ICR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| RBC (106/ul) | 10.55 ± 0.44 | 9.10 ± 0.27** | 10.50 ± 0.25 | 8.61 ± 0.58** | 10.72 ± 0.24 | 8.72 ± 0.25** |
| HGB (g/dl) | 15.67 ± 0.71 | 14.67 ± 0.58** | 15.58 ± 0.33 | 13.98 ± 0.75** | 15.79 ± 0.44 | 14.26 ± 0.36** |
| HCT (%) | 50.93 ± 1.77 | 47.94 ± 1.76** | 49.21 ± 1.04 | 46.15 ± 2.61** | 50.55 ± 1.13 | 46.44 ± 1.07** |
| MCV (fL) | 48.32 ± 0.92 | 52.70 ± 1.47** | 46.88 ± 0.40 | 53.61 ± 1.36** | 47.16 ± 0.37 | 53.30 ± 1.40** |
| MCH (pg) | 14.86 ± 0.20 | 16.14 ± 0.66** | 14.84 ± 0.16 | 16.26 ± 0.58** | 14.72 ± 0.14 | 16.28 ± 0.37** |
| MCHC (g/dl) | 30.79 ± 0.79 | 30.64 ± 0.68 | 31.64 ± 0.35 | 30.31 ± 0.45** | 31.25 ± 0.38 | 30.69 ± 0.41** |
| PLT (103/ul) | 1117.70 ± 134.98 | 1276.30 ± 184.56 | 1065.00 ± 200.56 | 1505.10 ± 179.39** | 1107.60 ± 122.23 | 1275.50 ± 193.77** |
| WBC (103/ul) | 2.23 ± 0.85 | 2.58 ± 0.80 | 2.62 ± 0.77 | 4.98 ± 1.28** | 1.48 ± 0.28 | 3.38 ± 1.11** |
| WBC Diffrential count | ||||||
| Neutrophil (103/ul) | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 0.43 ± 0.14 | 0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.74 ± 0.51 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.13 |
| Lymphocyte (103/ul) | 1.57 ± 0.48 | 1.94 ± 0.64 | 2.11 ± 0.65 | 3.95 ± 1.27** | 1.15 ± 0.16 | 2.59 ± 0.87 |
| Monocyte (103/ul) | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02** | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
| Eosinophil (103/ul) | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.09 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.18 |
| Basophil (103/ul) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01** | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 15.98 ± 4.76 | 17.09 ± 4.87 | 14.42 ± 1.43 | 15.19 ± 9.47 | 16.89 ± 2.74 | 15.87 ± 4.26** |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 72.13 ± 10.14 | 74.57 ± 4.76 | 79.99 ± 2.02 | 78.71 ± 9.55 | 77.60 ± 11.75 | 76.14 ± 4.41** |
| Monocyte (%) | 1.40 ± 0.70 | 2.05 ± 0.50 | 1.48 ± 0.24 | 1.58 ± 0.43 | 1.80 ± 0.88 | 2.32 ± 0.31** |
| Eosinophil (%) | 2.31 ± 1.46 | 4.40 ± 1.86 | 2.68 ± 0.45 | 2.94 ± 2.32 | 4.02 ± 1.66 | 3.65 ± 3.10 |
| Basophil (%) | 0.55 ± 0.28 | 0.58 ± 0.29 | 0.47 ± 0.22 | 0.48 ± 0.18 | 0.79 ± 0.36 | 0.60 ± 0.25 |
| Reti (103/ul) | 339.60 ± 30.29 | 318.06 ± 148.94 | 341.60 ± 25.56 | 331.18 ± 58.50 | 325.71 ± 28.23 | 355.47 ± 53.07 |
| Reti (%) | 3.23 ± 0.37 | 3.51 ± 1.65 | 3.26 ± 0.27 | 3.88 ± 0.87 | 3.04 ± 0.20 | 3.84 ± 0.55** |
The data shown represent the mean ± SD (n = 10/group)
*Significantly different from the negative control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)
Table 3.
Serum biochemistry analysis of Korl:ICR, A:ICR and B:ICR with BoNT/A muscle treatment
| Parameters/Groups | Con-Korl:ICR | Treated-Korl:ICR | Con-A:ICR | Treated-A:ICR | Con-B:ICR | Treated-B:ICR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 159.19 ± 0.79 | 152.95 ± 1.28** | 156.24 ± 1.06 | 150.09 ± 2.05** | 157.43 ± 1.2 | 153.16 ± 1.96** |
| K (mmol/L) | 7.00 ± 0.05 | 5.65 ± 0.71** | 6.78 ± 0.04 | 6.91 ± 0.55 | 6.90 ± 0.08 | 6.74 ± 0.83 |
| CL (mmol/L) | 117.81 ± 0.46 | 115.75 ± 3.07 | 115.77 ± 0.84 | 107.91 ± 2.57** | 116.35 ± 1.06 | 111.12 ± 1.36** |
| TP (g/dL) | 5.35 ± 0.05 | 5.44 ± 0.30 | 5.28 ± 0.04 | 5.19 ± 0.34 | 5.28 ± 0.06 | 5.23 ± 0.37 |
| ALB (g/dL) | 3.29 ± 0.03 | 3.41 ± 0.18 | 3.14 ± 0.19 | 3.19 ± 0.20 | 3.21 ± 0.03 | 3.14 ± 0.22 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 20.70 ± 0.20 | 18.54 ± 3.55 | 20.36 ± 0.13 | 18.64 ± 3.60 | 20.43 ± 0.23 | 20.18 ± 1.96 |
| CRE (mg/dL) | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.07** | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.05** | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.30 ± 0.05** |
| GLU (mg/dL) | 164.30 ± 0.95 | 152.80 ± 22.24 | 161.10 ± 1.29 | 210.50 ± 23.90** | 161.60 ± 1.96 | 159.90 ± 13.86 |
| TBIL (mg/dL) | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.05** | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.05 |
| Ca (mg/dL) | 10.12 ± 0.06 | 9.96 ± 0.41 | 9.98 ± 0.09 | 9.95 ± 0.41 | 10.02 ± 0.12 | 10.07 ± 0.45 |
| PHOS (mg/dL) | 8.62 ± 0.04 | 9.38 ± 1.10 | 8.47 ± 0.07 | 10.12 ± 1.06** | 8.50 ± 0.08 | 9.11 ± 0.58** |
| TCHOL (mg/dL) | 133.10 ± 0.74 | 108.10 ± 17.15** | 130.60 ± 1.17 | 122.40 ± 13.79 | 131.20 ± 1.32 | 137.70 ± 28.72 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 127.80 ± 1.48 | 43.80 ± 19.56** | 132.00 ± 1.41 | 104.40 ± 31.73 | 129.80 ± 1.32 | 108.60 ± 29.96 |
| AST (U/L) | 144.60 ± 0.70 | 140.40 ± 119.47 | 141.80 ± 1.40 | 86.50 ± 62.67 | 142.80 ± 1.03 | 70.40 ± 38.61** |
| ALT (U/L) | 49.40 ± 0.52 | 36.40 ± 8.37** | 48.50 ± 0.53 | 41.60 ± 19.59 | 48.60 ± 0.52 | 35.80 ± 10.96** |
| ALP (U/L) | 501.10 ± 2.33 | 384.10 ± 87.26** | 492.80 ± 4.08 | 370.10 ± 95.19** | 494.80 ± 4.26 | 326.00 ± 84.85** |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 120.50 ± 0.97 | 95.70 ± 14.01** | 117.20 ± 1.23 | 103.90 ± 11.75** | 118.80 ± 1.14 | 119.80 ± 24.47 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 11.50 ± 0.18 | 19.35 ± 4.30** | 11.46 ± 0.46 | 16.83 ± 4.38** | 11.56 ± 0.20 | 16.81 ± 8.31 |
| PL (mg/dL) | 251.20 ± 3.88 | 189.80 ± 26.86** | 255.00 ± 5.03 | 228.20 ± 21.76** | 252.90 ± 3.87 | 256.20 ± 41.74 |
| hsCRP (mg/dL) | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 |
The data shown represent the mean ± SD (n = 10/group)
*Significantly different from the negative control group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). The data represent the mean ± SD
Gene expression patterns
The expression patterns of seven muscle-related genes were analyzed in the BoNT/A-treated and the negative control groups (Fig. 2). Collagen type 1 (Col1a1), interleukin 6 (Il-6), transforming growth factor beta 1(Tgf-b1), matrix metallopeptidase (Mmp-2), myosin heavy chain IIa (MhcIIa), myosin heavy chain IIb (MhcIIb), myosin heavy chain IIx (MhcIIx) were the target genes analyzed. The gene expression levels of Il-6 and Tgf-b1 showed significant upregulation in the BoNT/A-treated group compared to the negative control group in Korl:ICR mice. There was no significant difference in expression of other target genes between the groups.
Fig. 2.
Gene expression patterns of muscle-related target genes following BoNT/A muscle injection in ICR mice from three different sources. a–g qRT-PCR comparing negative control groups and BoNT/A treated groups. Expression levels of collagen type 1 (Col1a1), interleukin 6 (Il-6), transforming growth factor beta 1 (Tgf-b1), matrix metallopeptidase (Mmp-2), myosin heavy chain IIa (MhcIIa), myosin heavy chain IIb (MhcIIb), and myosin heavy chain IIx (MhcIIx) were analyzed. *Significantly different compared to the negative control group (*p < 0.05). The data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates
Histopathology analysis of muscle
For histology analysis, we performed H&E staining of mouse muscle samples after necropsy (Fig. 3). Compared with negative control groups, the change of muscle fibers was detected more commonly in the BoNT/A-treated groups. These changes, decreased muscle fibers, were obvious, while other findings including inflammation were not. Quantitative histology analysis of muscle fiber change was done using the image analysis software ImageJ. Decreased muscle fiber was confirmed in all mice in the BoNT/A-treated groups compared to those in the negative control groups. The BoNT/A-treated groups showed obvious muscle fiber change, with A:ICR and B:ICR mice showing especially significant decreased muscle fibers (Fig. 3). Overall, the above results indicated that various responses to BoNT/A muscle injection were similar in ICR mice originating from three different sources.
Fig. 3.
Histopathology analysis following BoNT/A muscle injection in ICR mice from three different sources. a H&E staining of mice muscle. Scale bar = 50 μm. b–d Muscle size was compared between the negative control and BoNT/A treated groups. *Significantly different compared to the negative control group (*p < 0.05). The data represent the mean ± SD of three replicates
Discussion
BoNT/A is used in a range of areas for various applications. For therapeutic purposes, BoNT/A’s ability to induce muscle paralysis has been clinically applied in the treatment of muscular overactivity conditions such as hyperhidrosis, chronic anal fissure, and spastic muscle diseases. In recent years, BoNT/A has been more widely used as an agent in plastic surgery for improvement of external appearance than for disease treatment. It has been applied to many muscles for cosmetic purposes, including the muscles around the jaw and calf muscles. Studies using BoNT/A have largely involved safety assessments via potency tests in laboratory animals. In addition, studies addressing mechanism and phenotype of muscle change have been reported, including those evaluating dose-dependent responses to BoNT/A muscle injection [23].
Research using laboratory animals with rodent has long been conducted on basic research and treatment of human diseases and on the pathogenesis. Using experimental animal models, various mechanisms including toxicity assessment and efficacy of disease had been used. ICR mice, an outbred rodent model, have been previously used for the study of BoNT/A [24]. In previous rodent experiments, muscle change through the administration of BoNT/A muscle was found at various concentrations [23], but no comparative study has been conducted with ICR mice originating from different sources. The present study investigated the response to BoNT/A injection into muscle using mice from three different sources, Korl:ICR, A:ICR, and B:ICR.
We assessed muscle response through histopathology evaluation after BoNT/A administration, as well as via various physiological assessments including weight measurement, and hematology and serum biochemistry analyses. To the best of our knowledge, such a range of data has not previously been reported in the context of BoNT/A administration to laboratory animals. Weight loss following BoNT/A administration was observed in all treated groups (Fig. 1). Although no behavioral tests were performed, a limitation in movement due to decreased muscle fiber caused by BoNT/A was apparent. Weight change may thus have occurred in the BoNT/A-treated groups due to reduced feed intake consequent to reduced mobility. Results of clinical pathology assessment confirmed statistically significant changes in several hematology and serum biochemistry parameters in the BoNT/A-treated groups (Tables 2 and 3). In GLU data, significant up-regulation was observed in A:ICR (Table 3). In the case of TCHOL and TG, significant down-regulation was observed in Korl: ICR (Table 3). This is thought to be a specific expression according to each mice source. These results suggest that changes in serum biochemical parameters due to the administration of BoNT/A muscle may have specificity in mice from different sources. Therefore, in the serum biochemical evaluation of BoNT/A mice, some parameters may need to consider the specificity of the each mice source. These changes in the parameter values are considered be due to the administration of BoNT/A muscle injection. However, many of the changed clinical pathologic parameter values were found to be within the normal range of reference to the previous studies [25–27]. Given that this is the first report of clinical pathology data after intramuscular administration of BoNT/A in ICR mice, our findings are meaningful and justify further experiments. We evaluated gene expression patterns of Col1a1, Il-6, Tgf-b1, Mmp-2, MhcIIa, MhcIIb, and MhcIIx as target markers. A previous study evaluated the expression patterns of related genes after high dose BoNT/A (6.0 U/kg) muscle injection, and found an increase in levels of IL-6, an inflammation-related marker, and in those of Tgf-b1 [23]. Our results confirmed a significant increase in expression levels of Il-6 and Tgf-b1 in Korl: ICR. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the expression patterns of the evaluated genes in mice from the other two sources. Based on these results, inflammation was expected to have occurred in the Korl:ICR mice, but no such findings were apparent in clinical or histopathology data. This discrepancy may have been due to the lower dose (1.0 U/kg) of BoNT/A we used, compared to that in the previous study [23]. Sprague Dawley rats (SD rats) were used for BoNT/A administration in the previous study and the results were analyzed after 21 days. The difference in the expression patterns of the target gene compared to the previous study is considerate to attribute to differences in used animal species, dose level, and duration of experiment.
In this experiment, the histopathological evaluation showed that the decreased muscle fiber resulting from the administration of the muscles of BoNT/A was generally induced (Fig. 3). Quantitative assessment of muscle change also confirmed the above findings (Fig. 3). As mentioned earlier, no inflammatory findings were accompanied.
Conclusions
In summary, we evaluated physiological, clinical pathological, and histopathological responses to injection of BoNT/A into calf muscles of ICR mice originating from three different sources. The three different groups of mice, Korl:ICR, A:ICR, and B:ICR showed similar responses to BoNT/A injection and consequent decreased muscle fiber liesions. Our results suggest that the Korl:ICR mice are as widely applicable in muscle-related studies using BoNT/A, as other currently commercially available ICR mice.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by a grant of NLAR (National Laboratory Animal Resources) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2018.
Abbreviations
- A:ICR
USA source
- ALB
Albumin
- ALP
Alkaline phosphatase
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- B:ICR
Japan source
- BoNT/A
Botulinum-toxin A
- BUN
Blood urea nitrogen
- Ca
Calcium
- CHO
Total cholesterol
- Cl
Chloride
- Col1a1
Collagen type 1
- CRE
Creatinine
- GLU
Glucose
- H&E
Hematoxylin and eosin
- HCT
Hematocrit
- HDL
High density lipoprotein
- HGB
Hemoglobin
- hsCRP
High-sensitive C-reactive protein
- Il-6
Interleukin 6
- IP
'Inorganic phosphorus
- K
Potassium
- Korl:ICR
Korea FDA source
- LDL
Low density lipoprotein
- MCH
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin
- MCHC
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
- MCV
Mean corpuscular volume
- MhcIIa
Myosin heavy chain IIa
- MhcIIb
Myosin heavy chain IIb
- MhcIIx
Myosin heavy chain IIx
- Mmp-2
Matrix metallopeptidase
- Na
Sodium
- PL
Phospholipid
- PLT
Platelet
- RBC
Red blood cell
- RET
Reticulocyte
- SPF
Specific pathogen-free
- TBIL
Total bilirubin
- TG
Triglyceride
- Tgf-b1
Transforming growth factor beta 1
- TP
Total protein
- WBC
White blood cell
Author’s contributions
Designed the study: KSK, MSS, YIK, Data preparation: KKK, SKO, SES, MSS, YIK, Data analysis: YSJ, JYC, HKS, DYH, SJP, KKK, Data visualization: KKK, SKO, SES, Manuscript preparation: MSS, YIK, KSK, Supervision of the study: KSK. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This project was supported by a grant of NLAR (National Laboratory Animal Resources) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2018.
Availability of data and materials
Data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are also available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Min-Soo Seo and Young-In Kim are the co-first authors
References
- 1.Swaminathan S, Eswaramoorthy S. Structural analysis of the catalytic and binding sites of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin B. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7(8):693–699. doi: 10.1038/78005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lalli G, Bohnert S, Deinhardt K, Verastegui C, Schiavo G. The journey of tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins in neurons. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11(9):431–437. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(03)00210-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Greenfield RA, Brown BR, Hutchins JB, Iandolo JJ, Jackson R, Slater LN, et al. Microbiological, biological, and chemical weapons of warfare and terrorism. Am J Med Sci. 2002;323(6):326–340. doi: 10.1097/00000441-200206000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scott AB. Botulinum toxin injection of eye muscles to correct strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1981;79:734–770. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hsieh Po-Fan, Chiu Hung-Chieh, Chen Kuan-Chieh, Chang Chao-Hsiang, Chou Eric. Botulinum toxin A for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder. Toxins. 2016;8(3):59. doi: 10.3390/toxins8030059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dat A, Chin M, Skinner S, Farmer C, Wale R, Carne P, et al. Botulinum toxin therapy for chronic anal fissures: where are we at currently? ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(9):E70–EE3. doi: 10.1111/ans.13329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Camargo CH, Cattai L, Teive HA. Pain relief in cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin treatment. Toxins (Basel) 2015;7(6):2321–2335. doi: 10.3390/toxins7062321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang H, Zhang H, Wei Y, Lian Y, Chen Y, Zheng Y. Treatment of chronic daily headache with comorbid anxiety and depression using botulinum toxin a: a prospective pilot study. Int J Neurosci. 2017;127(4):285–290. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1196687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schantz EJ, Johnson EA. Properties and use of botulinum toxin and other microbial neurotoxins in medicine. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56(1):80–99. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.80-99.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garcia A, Fulton JE., Jr Cosmetic denervation of the muscles of facial expression with botulinum toxin. A dose-response study. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22(1):39–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stanley EF, Drachman DB. Botulinum toxin blocks quantal but not non-quantal release of ACh at the neuromuscular junction. Brain Res. 1983;261(1):172–175. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91300-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nigam PK, Nigam A. Botulinum toxin. Indian J Dermatol. 2010;55(1):8–14. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.60343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abrams A, Kegeles G, Hottle GA. The purification of toxin from Clostridium botulinum type a. J Biol Chem. 1946;164:63–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alstyne DV, Gerwing J, Tremaine JH. Amino acid composition of Clostridium botulinum type a toxin. J Bacteriol. 1966;92(3):796–797. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.3.796-797.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cui S, Chesson C, Hope R. Genetic variation within and between strains of outbred Swiss mice. Lab Anim. 1993;27(2):116–123. doi: 10.1258/002367793780810397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pellett S, Bradshaw M, Tepp WH, Pier CL, Whitemarsh RCM, Chen C, et al. The Light Chain Defines the Duration of Action of Botulinum Toxin Serotype A Subtypes. MBio. 2018;9(2):1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Whitemarsh RC, Tepp WH, Bradshaw M, Lin G, Pier CL, Scherf JM, et al. Characterization of botulinum neurotoxin a subtypes 1 through 5 by investigation of activities in mice, in neuronal cell cultures, and in vitro. Infect Immun. 2013;81(10):3894–3902. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00536-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pearce LB, Borodic GE, First ER, MacCallum RD. Measurement of botulinum toxin activity: evaluation of the lethality assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994;128(1):69–77. doi: 10.1006/taap.1994.1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torii Y, Goto Y, Nakahira S, Kozaki S, Kaji R, Ginnaga A. Comparison of systemic toxicity between botulinum toxin subtypes A1 and A2 in mice and rats. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;116(6):524–528. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cichon JV, Jr, McCaffrey TV, Litchy WJ, Knops JL. The effect of botulinum toxin type a injection on compound muscle action potential in an in vivo rat model. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(2):144–148. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199502000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chung ME, Song DH, Park JH. Comparative study of biological activity of four botulinum toxin type a preparations in mice. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(1 Pt 2):155–164. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Torii Y, Akaike N, Harakawa T, Kato K, Sugimoto N, Goto Y, et al. Type A1 but not type A2 botulinum toxin decreases the grip strength of the contralateral foreleg through axonal transport from the toxin-treated foreleg of rats. J Pharmacol Sci. 2011;117(4):275–285. doi: 10.1254/jphs.11121FP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pingel J, Nielsen MS, Lauridsen T, Rix K, Bech M, Alkjaer T, et al. Injection of high dose botulinum-toxin a leads to impaired skeletal muscle function and damage of the fibrilar and non-fibrilar structures. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14997-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stone AV, Ma J, Whitlock PW, Koman LA, Smith TL, Smith BP, et al. Effects of Botox and Neuronox on muscle force generation in mice. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(12):1658–1664. doi: 10.1002/jor.20450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shin HJ, Cho YM, Shin HJ, Kim HD, Choi KM, Kim MG, et al. Comparison of commonly used ICR stocks and the characterization of Korl:ICR. Lab Anim Res. 2017;33(1):8–14. doi: 10.5625/lar.2017.33.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Serfilippi LM, Pallman DR, Russell B. Serum clinical chemistry and hematology reference values in outbred stocks of albino mice from three commonly used vendors and two inbred strains of albino mice. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003;42(3):46–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wolford ST, Schroer RA, Gohs FX, Gallo PP, Brodeck M, Falk HB, et al. Reference range data base for serum chemistry and hematology values in laboratory animals. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1986;18(2):161–188. doi: 10.1080/15287398609530859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are also available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.