Abstract
Cluster of differentiation 27 (CD27) is a member of the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily and plays a key role in T-cell activation by providing a costimulatory signal. Bound to its natural ligand CD70, CD27 signalling enhances T-cell proliferation and differentiation to effector and memory T cells and therefore has potential as an immune modulatory target in cancer treatment. The CD27 agonistic antibody varlilumab showed promising efficacy in haematological as well as solid cancers. Current studies investigate the combination of the CD27 agonistic antibody varlilumab in combination with the PD1 axis targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors like nivolumab or atezolizumab. Further, CD70 expression is used as a therapeutic target for ADCs, antibodies inducing ADCC, as well as the immunological target for chimeric antigen receptor gene-modified T cells and specific dendritic cell vaccination. In line with this, targeting the CD27 axis was shown to be feasible and safe in early clinical trials with the most commonly occurring side effects being thrombocytopenia, fatigue and nausea. In this mini review, we aimed to elucidate the immunobiology of CD27 and its potential as a target in cancer immunotherapy.
Keywords: CD27, CD70, TNFRSF, costimulatory receptor, immunotherapy
Physiological function of CD27
Cluster of differentiation 27 (CD27, also TNFRSF7) is a transmembrane glycoprotein physiologically expressed on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells and thymocytes, and is induced on B cells on priming.1 CD27 belongs to the tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) and plays a key role in T-cell and B-cell costimulation.1 2 The natural ligand of CD27 is CD70 (CD27 ligand or CD27-L) which is quite restrictively and only transiently expressed on activated immune cells, including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs) and NK cells.3 4
Members of the TNFRSF like CD27 frequently present as key costimulatory T-cell receptors in order to generate a functional immune response.5 The costimulatory T- cell signal via CD27 further enhances cell division and cell survival, as well as effector functions like cytokine production, especially IP-10, or cytotoxicity by activating different pathways like the nuclear factor-κB, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase or protein kinase B.6 Therefore, CD27/CD70 costimulation has the potential to boost the immunity by T-cell activation, increased clonal expansion and enhanced differentiation into antigen-specific cytotoxic and memory T cells.7–12
Further, CD27/CD70 also has the capability of influencing the innate immune system by inducing proliferation and cytotoxicity by increased interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production of NK cells.13 With regard to the B-cell lineage, in vitro studies showed that T cells that are expressing CD27 and CD70 play a key role in regulating B-cell activation and immunoglobulin synthesis.14 15
CD27 signalling and CD70 expression in cancer
CD27 is a costimulatory T-cell receptor essential for optimal T-cell priming and memory differentiation. Especially in the activation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, CD27 signalling plays a central immunological role, potentially usable for antitumour therapy.16 Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumour microenvironment of solid tumours were shown to express CD27.17 The CD27 ligand CD70 is restrictively expressed on activated immune cells and is usually absent in non-lymphoid normal tissue.18 In various lymphoid malignancies like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL, 77%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 71%) and mantle cell lymphoma (5%) a constitutive expression of CD70 has been described.19–22 CD70 expression was frequently observed in several solid cancers including lung (10%), breast (2%), pancreatic (25%), ovarian (15%), colon (9%), renal cancer (87%), melanoma (16%) and glioblastoma (42%).21 23 24 Furthermore, the importance of CD27/CD70 signalling for anticancer immunity is underscored by the observation that patients with germ line, somatic mutations or deletions in CD27 or CD70 more frequently develop Hodgkin lymphoma or DLBCL.25 Therefore, targeting of the CD27/CD70 axis might be of therapeutic potential.
Targeting the CD27/CD70 axis with an agonistic CD27 antibody resulted in growth reduction of lung metastases and subcutaneous tumours in a B16 melanoma model.26 Anti-CD27 treatment also resulted in the maintenance of tumour-specific IFN-γ producing CD8+ T cells within the tumour.26 Efficacy of CD27/CD70 axis targeting antibodies was shown in preclinical models of lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), breast cancer and sarcoma.27–30 Growing evidence from preclinical studies further suggests a particular synergetic effect of agonistic CD27 antibodies with other immune-modulating agents, including OX40, CD40 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade.5 31 32 Combinational approaches of agonistic CD27 antibodies and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade presented with the highest preclinical efficacy, successfully eradicating tumours in preclinical models.32 33 Importantly, activation of the CD27/CD70 axis might also have protumoural immune suppressive effects driven by chronic stimulation and tumour-associated CD70 overexpression.18 This effect is attributable to CD27 exploitation, enhanced survival signalling in natural regulatory T cells (Tregs) and induction of apoptosis of effector T cells.18 34 35 Clinical data underlined this fact by showing that patients with follicular B-cell lymphoma with intratumoural CD70-expressing T cells presented with an exhausted phenotype with higher levels of PD-1 and T-cell immunoglobulin mucin domain-3.36
CD27/CD70 targeting agents under development
Targeting the immunological functions of the CD27 axis can be approached by agonistic CD27 antibodies inducing increased antitumour immunity (table 1).
Table 1.
Name of the compound | Mechanism of action | Tumour type | Phase of clinical trial development | Company | Clinical benefit rate= (CR+PR+SD)/ n (%) |
Most common side effects | Reference/trial number |
Varlilumab, CDX-1127 | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb | Haematological and solid cancers | Phase I, completed | Celldex Therapeutics | 9/56=16.1% | Fatigue (54%), nausea (30%), dyspnoea (25%) | Burris et al/NCT0146013440 |
SGN-75 | Humanised anti-CD70 IgG1 mAb linked to MMAF toxin | RCC, NHL | Phase I, completed | Seattle Genetics | 23/58=39.7% | Fatigue (40%), dry eye (32%), nausea (30%), thrombocytopenia (26%) | Tannir et al/NCT0101591121 |
SGN-75+everolimus | Humanised anti-CD70 IgG1 mAb linked to MMAF toxin+mTOR inhibitor | RCC | Phase I, terminated (reason: not available) | Seattle Genetics | n/a | n/a | NCT01677390 |
SGN-CD70A | ADC directed against CD70 antigen with the cytotoxic component PBD | RCC, Mantle-Cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, grade 3 follicular lymphoma | Phase I, completed | Seattle Genetics | RCC: 14/18=77.8% Lymphoma: 4/20=20% |
RCC: fatigue (67%), anaemia (61%), thrombocytopenia (56%) Lymphoma: thrombocytopenia (75%), nausea (55%), anaemia (50%), fatigue (50%) |
Pal et al, Phillips et al/NCT0221689044 49 |
AMG 172 | Humanised anti-CD27L IgG1 mAb linked to MCC-DM1 | RCC | Phase I, completed | Amgen | 8/37=21.6% | Thrombocytopenia (59%), nausea (54%), decreased appetite (49%), vomiting (46%), fatigue (35%) | Massard et al/NCT0149782145 |
ARGX-110 (Cusatuzumab) | Glycoengineered CD70 blocking mAb | Advanced cancers | Phase I, active, not recruiting | Argenx BVBA | 14/26=53.8% | Fatigue (65%), drug-related infusion-related reactions (38%), dyspnoea (31%), fever (31%) | Aftimos et al/NCT01813539+NCT0275925046 |
MDX-1203, BMS-936561 | ADC of humanised CD70-mAb linked to MED-2460 | RCC, NHL | Phase I, completed | BMS | 18/26=69.2% | Fatigue (85%), nausea (54%), decreased appetite (39%) | Owonikoko et al/NCT0094490548 |
Varlilumab+ nivolumab |
Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+fully human IgG4 mAb targeting PD-1 | SCCHN, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, RCC, glioblastoma | Phase I/II, completed | Celldex Therapeutics and BMS | OVA Ca: 24/49=49.0% CRC: 9/41=22.0% |
OVA Ca: pruritus (18%), rash (18%), infusion reaction (17%) CRC: infusion reaction (31%), nausea (17%), lymphopenia (17%) |
Sanborn et al/NCT0233591842 |
Varlilumab+ sunitinib |
Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+small molecule inhibiting multiple receptor tyrosine kinases | RCC, urogenital neoplasms | Phase I, terminated (reason: portfolio reprioritisation) | Celldex Therapeutics | n/a | n/a | NCT02386111 |
Varlilumab+ ipilimumab+CDX-1401 |
Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+human mAb blocking CTLA-4+immunomodulating vaccine made of fully human mAb linked to NY-ESO-1 in combination with poly-ICLC (Hiltonol) | Unresectable Stage III or stage IV melanoma | Phase I/II, terminated (reason: feasibility concerns due to changes in standard of care) | Celldex Therapeutics | n/a | n/a | NCT02413827 |
Varlilumab+ ONT-10 |
Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+liposomal synthetic glycopolypeptide vaccine MUC1 targeted antigen formulated with PET lipid A adjuvant | Breast cancer, ovarian cancer | Phase Ib, completed | Cascadian Therapeutics+ Celldex Therapeutics |
n/a | n/a | NCT02270372 |
TriMix-DC+ TLR-DC |
Autologous dendritic cell vaccine | Melanoma | Phase I/II, completed | Radboud University | 8/15=53.3% | Local skin injection site reactions: irritation, erythema, swelling (100%), flu-like symptoms (53%), chills (20%), fever (20%) | Wilgenhof et al/NCT0153069850 |
ADC, antibody drug conjugate; CD27, cluster of differentiation 27; CD70, cluster of differentiation 70; CR, complete response; CRC, colorectal cancer; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; DC, dentritic cell; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MCC-DM1, 4-[N-maleimidomethyl] cyclohexane-1-carboxylate + maytansine; MMAF, monomethyl auristatin F; mTor, mammalian target of rapamycin; MUC1, mucin 1; n/a, not available; NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; NY-ESO-1, New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1; OVA Ca, ovarian cancer; PBD, pyrrolobenzodiazepine; PD-1, programmed cell death 1; poly-ICLC, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilised with polylysine and carboxymethyl cellulose; PR, partial response; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RT, radiotherapy; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and nNeck; SD, stable disease; TLR, toll-like receptor.
A human monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed at CD27 named varlilumab (also CDX-1127, 1F5) has entered clinical trials after showing preclinical efficacy.37–39 A phase I study evaluated the safety and dosage in a total of n=56 patients with haematological cancers and advanced solid tumours, including metastatic melanoma, RCC, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NCT01460134). One of 15 patients with metastatic RCC achieved a partial response with 78% of tumour shrinkage and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.3 years, and 8/56 (14.29%) patients achieved stabilisation of disease (range of PFS 3.8–47.3 months).40 One of 19 patients with heavily pretreated advanced B-cell lymphoma achieved a complete response (CR).41 Varlilumab is further investigated in a phase I/II dose escalation and cohort expansion study (NCT02335918) in combination with nivolumab in different solid malignancies (n=175 patients).42 So far, results are available only for colorectal and ovarian cancer showing that 5/49 (10%) of ovarian cancer patients achieved a partial response (PR) and 19/49 (39%) a stable disease (SD). Biopsies of ovarian cancer patients on treatment showed an increase in PD-1 and CD8+ T-cell expression profiles more prevalent in patients who had a better outcome.42 In patients with colorectal cancer, 2/41 (5%) presented with a PR and 7/41 (17%) with a SD.42 Investigation of biomarkers showed transient increases in serum chemokine levels and a decrease in circulating Tregs. Therefore, depletion of Tregs might also add to the antitumour immune-modulating activities of varlilumab, as well as to the risk of increased autoimmunity.43 Further phase I trials with various combinations as well as phase II trials are still ongoing in RCC, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, ovarian and colorectal cancers, and glioblastoma (table 2).
Table 2.
Name of the compound | Mechanism of action | Tumour type | Phase of clinical trial development | Company | Reference/trial number |
Varlilumab+atezolizumab in combination with radiation therapy | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+fully human IgG1 inhibitory mAb targeting PD-L1 | Stage III–IV NSCLC, metastatic NSCLC, unresectable NSCLC | Phase I, recruiting | Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey+NCI | NCT04081688 |
Varlilumab+IMA950 vaccine+Poly ICLC (Hiltonol) | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+multipeptide vaccine containing 11 tumour-associated peptides | Glioma, malignant glioma, astrocytoma grade II, oligodendroglioma, astrocytic oligoastrocytoma | Phase I, recruiting | Celldex Therapeutics | NCT02924038 |
Anti-hCD70 CAR | Anti-hCD70 CAR transduced PBL targeting CD70 | Pancreatic cancer, RCC, breast cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer | Phase I/II, recruiting | NCI | NCT02830724 |
4SCAR70 | Fourth-generation CAR-T cell targeting CD70 | B-cell malignancies | Phase I/II, recruiting | Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute | NCT03125577 |
Varlilumab+nivolumab | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+fully human IgG4 mAb targeting PD-1 | B-cell lymphoma | Phase II, recruiting | NCI | NCT03038672 |
Varlilumab+DC vaccinations+standard of care RT and TMZ | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+human pp65 CMV DCs+radiotherapy+alkylating agent | Glioblastoma | Phase II, suspended (reason: pending new testing requirements from the FDA) | Celldex Therapeutics | NCT03688178 |
Varlilumab+rituximab | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+mAb targeting CD20 | B-cell lymphoma | Phase IIa, recruiting | University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust+Celldex Therapeutics | NCT03307746 |
Varlilumab+vaccination with 6MHP | Fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb+6 melanoma helper vaccine composed of 6 class II MHC-restricted helper peptides | Stage II–IV melanoma | Phase I/II, recruiting | Craig L Slingluff Jr+Celldex Therapeutics | NCT03617328 |
Cusatuzumab+azacitidine | Glycoengineered CD70 blocking mAb+antimetabolite/demethylating agent | AML | Phase I+II, recruiting | Janssen Research & Development, LLV+Argenx BVBA |
NCT04023526/ NCT04150887 |
AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; CAR-T cell, chimeric antigen receptor gene-modified T cell; CD27, cluster of differentiation 27; CD70, cluster of differentiation 70; DC, dentritic cell; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; mAb, monoclonal antibody; 6MHP, 6 melanoma helper vaccine comprised of 6 class II MHC-restricted helper peptides; NCI, National Cancer Institute; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocytes; PD-L1, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1; poly-ICLC, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilised with polylysine and carboxymethyl cellulose; RT, radiotherapy; TMZ, temozolomide.
Furthermore, also CD70 targeting agents are tested in clinical trials with different compounds (table 1).24 44 45 Here, CD70 is rather used as a specific target on the tumour cells.
Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) use CD70 expression on tumour cells in a ‘Trojan horse’-like function, allowing the linked cytotoxic agents to enter the tumour cells and induce cytotoxicity. CD70 expression on tumour cells can be targeted by specific antibodies in order to induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Chimeric antigen receptor gene-modified T (CAR-T) cells, as well as specific DC vaccinations targeting CD70 expression, were developed to use CD70 as a specific therapeutic target.
The CD70 targeting antibody ARGX-110, also named cusatuzumab, a glycoengineered mAb targeting CD70, was tested in various solid and haematological malignancies expressing CD70. The afucosylation of the anti-CD70 mAb is intended to improve its ability to induce the ADCC of CD70-expressing tumour cells. The best achieved overall response was SD in 14/26 (54%) patients.46 Five patients (RCC, ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, myoepithelial carcinoma and mesothelioma) had a PFS of >6 months.46 One patient with T-cell lymphoma achieved a complete haematological response.47
A multicentric phase I study tested the ADC MDX-1203 (BMS-936561) consisting of a mAb targeting CD70 (MDX-1115) linked to a small drug molecule MED-2460.48 In total, n=26 patients with advanced RCC or relapsed/refractory B-NHL were included. Preliminary efficacy assessment showed that 18/26 (69%) of patients achieved SD as best response. SGN-75, another CD70-blocking ADC, was tested in n=58 patients with relapsed or refractory CD70+ NHL or metastatic RCC.21 Of the 58 patients, 1 achieved a CR, 2 patients had a PR and 20 (34.5%) had a SD. All three patients with objective responses had a 95% positively stained CD70 expression. SGN-CD70A was developed with a different cytotoxic agent, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, and investigated in n=18 CD70-positive RCC and n=20 patients with NHL in a phase I study (NCT02216890). One of 18 patients with RCC achieved a PR and 13/18 (72%) patients had a SD, resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 78%.44 In patients with NHL, 1/20 patients achieved a CR and 3/20 a PR.49 However, further development of this compound was stopped due to the high occurrence rate (94%) of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Eighty-three per cent of patients in the early clinical development presented with at least one grade 3 treatment-related AE. The most frequently observed treatment-related AEs included thrombocytopenia (65%), neutropenia (30%) and anaemia (25%).49 AMG 172 is another anti-CD70 ADC which was administered in n=37 patients with clear-cell RCC.45 Two (5.4%) patients achieved a PR, 6 (16%) had a SD and 13 (35%) patients had a progressive disease.45
In another clinical trial, intradermal autologous TriMix-DC therapy that consists of monocyte-derived DCs targeting CD70, CD40L and constitutively active toll-like receptor four was tested in n=15 patients with stage IV melanoma (NCT01530698).50 Of 15 patients, 2 achieved a CR, another 2 patients achieved a PR, and 4 patients a SD. TriMix-DC therapy was considered feasible, safe and immunogenic. In a preclinical study it could be shown that CD8+ T cells that were precultured with TriMix-DCs were partially protected against Tregs suppression.51 Besides, Tregs have been shown to lose their suppressive capacity against effector T cells when cocultured with TriMix-DCs.51
Additionally, CD70 expression was used as the immunological target for CAR-T cells. Currently, two phase I/II trials, NCT02830724 and NCT03125577, are recruiting (table 2).
Tolerability of CD27 and CD70 targeting therapies
Targeting CD27 induces increased antitumour immunity and therefore also presents with known immunological AEs. Here, varlilumab (fully human IgG1 CD27 agonistic mAb) was generally well tolerated, also in the maximum tested dosage of 10 mg/kg. Treatment-related side effects were of minor grade 1 or 2 severity with most commonly occurring fatigue (30%), rash (20%), nausea (16%) and diarrhoea (11%). Only 1/56 patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3, an asymptomatic hyponatraemia that resolved spontaneously.40 Addition of varlilumab to nivolumab did not result in unexpected increased toxicity.43
CD70 expression is used as a therapeutic target by ADCs, antibodies inducing ADCC as well as CAR-T cells and specific DC vaccinations. Therefore, the side effect profile differs according to the applied therapeutic approach.
ARGX-110 (glycoengineered CD70 blocking mAb) showed a favourable safety profile without any dose-limiting toxicity and no immune-related AEs. Drug-related grade 3 AE (fatigue, anorexia and hypoxia) were observed in 2/26 patients.46
Further, several CD70 targeting ADCs were investigated. Safety reports did not conclude whether the major toxicity was derived from the payload or from targeting the CD70 axis. MDX-1203 (ADC of humanised CD70-mAb linked to MED-2460) targeting CD70 caused grade 3 hypersensitivity as a dose-limiting toxicity in 2/16 (13%) patients at the highest dosage of 15 mg/kg.48 The other most frequently recorded AE were fatigue (85%), nausea (54%), decreased appetite (39%), anaemia and dyspnoea (35% each). Grade 3 and 4 AE attributed to the study drug occurred in 9/26 (35%) of patients including pleural effusion (11.5%), face oedema (7.7%), thrombocytopenia (7.7%) and hypersensitivity (7.7%). Strikingly, delayed toxicities as in facial oedema and pleural or pericardial effusions occurred in 6/16 (38%) of patients and AE led to treatment continuation in 11/26 (42.3%) of patients who were treated at the highest dosage of 15 mg/kg.48 Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that an increased incidence of delayed hypersensitivity at the highest dosage was postulated to be related to the high total antibody load.48
The most commonly occurring AEs in patients treated with SGN-75 (humanised anti-CD70 IgG1 mAb linked to monomethyl auristatin F toxin) were fatigue (40%), dry eye (32%), nausea (30%) and thrombocytopenia (26%). Due to the occurrence of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in two patients with NHL who were treated weekly, the dose escalation regimen in the weekly schedule was terminated.21 Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities as in grade three nephrotic syndrome and Grade 4 neutropenia.21 In the therapy with SGN-CD70, thrombocytopenia occurring in 56% presented as dose-limiting toxicity.44 In the AMG 172 trial, the most common side effects were again thrombocytopenia (59%), nausea (54%), decreased appetite (49%), emesis (46%) and fatigue (35%).45
Conclusions
In conclusion, the CD27/70 axis is a promising pathway for immunotherapies showing a potential clinical benefit in different haematological and solid tumours. Also combining agonistic costimulatory CD27 mAbs with already established immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD-1 targeting mAbs is foreseen to have a synergistic effect by different favourable effects on the tumour microenvironment. Further, CD70 targeting agents like CD70 directed ADCs bear the potential of effectively targeting CD70-expressing solid and haematological tumours. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate potential combinations of immune-modulating therapies, also at earlier stages of disease, to achieve the best possible outcome for patients with different cancers.
Footnotes
Contributors: AMS performed the literature search and wrote the manuscript. ASB corrected and wrote the manuscript.
Funding: This review was performed within the PhD thesis of AMS with the title 'Immune Monitoring in Cancer Patients' in the N790 programme at the Medical University Vienna, Austria. The PhD project is supported by the research budget of the Medical University of Vienna and an unrestricted research grant by Hoffmann La Roche.
Competing interests: ASB has research support from Daiichi Sankyo, Hoffmann La-Roche and honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Roche, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, as well as travel support from Roche, Amgen and AbbVie. AMS has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Patient consent for publication: Not required.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Borst J, Hendriks J, Xiao Y. CD27 and CD70 in T cell and B cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol 2005;17:275–81. 10.1016/j.coi.2005.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bodmer J-L, Schneider P, Tschopp J. The molecular architecture of the TNF superfamily. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:19–26. 10.1016/S0968-0004(01)01995-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tesselaar K, Xiao Y, Arens R, et al. . Expression of the murine CD27 ligand CD70 in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 2003;170:33–40. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lens SM, Tesselaar K, van Oers MH, et al. . Control of lymphocyte function through CD27-CD70 interactions. Semin Immunol 1998;10:491–9. 10.1006/smim.1998.0154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buchan SL, Rogel A, Al-Shamkhani A. The immunobiology of CD27 and OX40 and their potential as targets for cancer immunotherapy. Blood 2018;131:39–48. 10.1182/blood-2017-07-741025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Croft M. Co-stimulatory members of the TNFR family: keys to effective T-cell immunity? Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:609–20. 10.1038/nri1148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Croft M, Benedict CA, Ware CF. Clinical targeting of the TNF and TNFR superfamilies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2013;12:147–68. 10.1038/nrd3930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Agematsu K, Hokibara S, Nagumo H, et al. . CD27: a memory B-cell marker. Immunol Today 2000;21:204–6. 10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01605-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hintzen RQ, Lens SM, Lammers K, et al. . Engagement of CD27 with its ligand CD70 provides a second signal for T cell activation. J Immunol 1995;154:2612–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yamada S, Shinozaki K, Agematsu K. Involvement of CD27/CD70 interactions in antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity by perforin-mediated cytotoxicity. Clin Exp Immunol 2002;130:424–30. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.02012.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hendriks J, Gravestein LA, Tesselaar K, et al. . CD27 is required for generation and long-term maintenance of T cell immunity. Nat Immunol 2000;1:433–40. 10.1038/80877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arens R, Schepers K, Nolte MA, et al. . Tumor rejection induced by CD70-mediated quantitative and qualitative effects on effector CD8+ T cell formation. J Exp Med 2004;199:1595–605. 10.1084/jem.20031111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takeda K, Oshima H, Hayakawa Y, et al. . CD27-mediated activation of murine NK cells. J Immunol 2000;164:1741–5. 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morimoto S, Kanno Y, Tanaka Y, et al. . CD134L engagement enhances human B cell Ig production: CD154/CD40, CD70/CD27, and CD134/CD134L interactions coordinately regulate T cell-dependent B cell responses. J Immunol 2000;164:4097–104. 10.4049/jimmunol.164.8.4097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kobata T, Jacquot S, Kozlowski S, et al. . CD27-CD70 interactions regulate B-cell activation by T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:11249–53. 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Taraban VY, Rowley TF, Kerr JP, et al. . CD27 costimulation contributes substantially to the expansion of functional memory CD8(+) T cells after peptide immunization. Eur J Immunol 2013;43:3314–23. 10.1002/eji.201343579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Agathanggelou A, Niedobitek G, Chen R, et al. . Expression of immune regulatory molecules in Epstein-Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomas with prominent lymphoid stroma. Evidence for a functional interaction between epithelial tumor cells and infiltrating lymphoid cells. Am J Pathol 1995;147:1152–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wajant H. Therapeutic targeting of CD70 and CD27. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2016;20:959–73. 10.1517/14728222.2016.1158812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhu Y, Hollmén J, Räty R, et al. . Investigatory and analytical approaches to differential gene expression profiling in mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2002;119:905–15. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03931.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kok M, Bonfrer JM, Korse CM, et al. . Serum soluble CD27, but not thymidine kinase, is an independent prognostic factor for outcome in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Tumour Biol 2003;24:53–60. 10.1159/000070661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tannir NM, Forero-Torres A, Ramchandren R, et al. . Phase I dose-escalation study of SGN-75 in patients with CD70-positive relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 2014;32:1246–57. 10.1007/s10637-014-0151-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lens SM, Drillenburg P, den Drijver BF, et al. . Aberrant expression and reverse signalling of CD70 on malignant B cells. Br J Haematol 1999;106:491–503. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01573.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wischhusen J, Jung G, Radovanovic I, et al. . Identification of CD70-mediated apoptosis of immune effector cells as a novel immune escape pathway of human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2002;62:2592–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ryan MC, Kostner H, Gordon KA, et al. . Targeting pancreatic and ovarian carcinomas using the auristatin-based anti-CD70 antibody-drug conjugate SGN-75. Br J Cancer 2010;103:676–84. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abolhassani H, Edwards ESJ, Ikinciogullari A, et al. . Combined immunodeficiency and Epstein-Barr virus-induced B cell malignancy in humans with inherited CD70 deficiency. J Exp Med 2017;214:91–106. 10.1084/jem.20160849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roberts DJ, Franklin NA, Kingeter LM, et al. . Control of established melanoma by CD27 stimulation is associated with enhanced effector function and persistence, and reduced PD-1 expression of tumor infiltrating CD8(+) T cells. J Immunother 2010;33:769–79. 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181ee238f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sakanishi T, Yagita H. Anti-tumor effects of depleting and non-depleting anti-CD27 monoclonal antibodies in immune-competent mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010;393:829–35. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Law C-L, Gordon KA, Toki BE, et al. . Lymphocyte activation antigen CD70 expressed by renal cell carcinoma is a potential therapeutic target for anti-CD70 antibody-drug conjugates. Cancer Res 2006;66:2328–37. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cormary C, Gonzalez R, Faye J-C, et al. . Induction of T-cell antitumor immunity and protection against tumor growth by secretion of soluble human CD70 molecules. Cancer Gene Ther 2004;11:497–507. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Couderc B, Zitvogel L, Douin-Echinard V, et al. . Enhancement of antitumor immunity by expression of CD70 (CD27 ligand) or CD154 (CD40 ligand) costimulatory molecules in tumor cells. Cancer Gene Ther 1998;5:163–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.French RR, Taraban VY, Crowther GR, et al. . Eradication of lymphoma by CD8 T cells following anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody therapy is critically dependent on CD27 costimulation. Blood 2007;109:4810–5. 10.1182/blood-2006-11-057216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ahrends T, Bąbała N, Xiao Y, et al. . CD27 agonism plus PD-1 blockade recapitulates CD4+ T-cell help in therapeutic anticancer vaccination. Cancer Res 2016;76:2921–31. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Buchan SL, Fallatah M, Thirdborough SM, et al. . Pd-1 blockade and cd27 stimulation activate distinct transcriptional programs that synergize for CD8þ+ T-cell–driven antitumor immunity. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:2383–94. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tesselaar K, Arens R, van Schijndel GMW, et al. . Lethal T cell immunodeficiency induced by chronic costimulation via CD27-CD70 interactions. Nat Immunol 2003;4:49–54. 10.1038/ni869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Claus C, Riether C, Schürch C, et al. . CD27 signaling increases the frequency of regulatory T cells and promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res 2012;72:3664–76. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang Z-Z, Grote DM, Xiu B, et al. . TGF-β upregulates CD70 expression and induces exhaustion of effector memory T cells in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Leukemia 2014;28:1872–84. 10.1038/leu.2014.84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vitale LA, He L-Z, Thomas LJ, et al. . Development of a human monoclonal antibody for potential therapy of CD27-expressing lymphoma and leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:3812–21. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.He L-Z, Prostak N, Thomas LJ, et al. . Agonist anti-human CD27 monoclonal antibody induces T cell activation and tumor immunity in human CD27-transgenic mice. J Immunol 2013;191:4174–83. 10.4049/jimmunol.1300409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ramakrishna V, Sundarapandiyan K, Zhao B, et al. . Characterization of the human T cell response to in vitro CD27 costimulation with varlilumab. J Immunother Cancer 2015;3:37 10.1186/s40425-015-0080-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Burris HA, Infante JR, Ansell SM, et al. . Safety and activity of Varlilumab, a novel and first-in-class agonist anti-CD27 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:2028–36. 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ansell SM, Northfelt DW, Flinn I, et al. . Phase I evaluation of an agonist anti-CD27 human antibody (CDX-1127) in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. JCO 2014;32:3024 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sanborn RE, Pishvaian MJ, Callahan MK, et al. . Anti-CD27 agonist antibody varlilumab (varli) with nivolumab (nivo) for colorectal (CRC) and ovarian (ova) cancer: phase (Ph) 1/2 clinical trial results. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:3001 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.3001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sanborn RE, Pishvaian MJ, Kluger HM, et al. . Clinical results with combination of anti-CD27 agonist antibody, varlilumab, with anti-PD1 antibody nivolumab in advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3007 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pal SK, Forero-Torres A, Thompson JA, et al. . A phase 1 trial of SGN-CD70A in patients with CD70-positive, metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 2019;125:1124–32. 10.1002/cncr.31912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Massard C, Soria J-C, Krauss J, et al. . First-in-human study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the anti-CD27L antibody-drug conjugate AMG 172 in patients with relapsed/refractory renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2019;83:1057–63. 10.1007/s00280-019-03796-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aftimos P, Rolfo C, Rottey S, et al. . Phase I Dose-escalation study of the Anti-CD70 antibody ARGX-110 in advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:6411–20. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Awada A, Rolfo CD, Rottey S, et al. . A phase I, first-in-human study of ARGX-110, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD70, a receptor involved in immune escape and tumor growth in patients with solid and hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:3023 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Owonikoko TK, Hussain A, Stadler WM, et al. . First-in-human multicenter phase I study of BMS-936561 (MDX-1203), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD70. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2016;77:155–62. 10.1007/s00280-015-2909-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Phillips T, Barr PM, Park SI, et al. . A phase 1 trial of SGN-CD70A in patients with CD70-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Invest New Drugs 2019;37:297–306. 10.1007/s10637-018-0655-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wilgenhof S, Van Nuffel AMT, Benteyn D, et al. . A phase IB study on intravenous synthetic mRNA electroporated dendritic cell immunotherapy in pretreated advanced melanoma patients. Annals of Oncology 2013;24:2686–93. 10.1093/annonc/mdt245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pen JJ, De Keersmaecker B, Maenhout SK, et al. . Modulation of regulatory T cell function by monocyte-derived dendritic cells matured through electroporation with mRNA encoding CD40 ligand, constitutively active TLR4, and CD70. J Immunol 2013;191:1976–83. 10.4049/jimmunol.1201008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]