Skip to main content
PMC home page
Diagnostic Pathology logoLink to Diagnostic Pathology
. 2020 Mar 20;15:25. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-00946-8

Downregulation of miR-484 is associated with poor prognosis and tumor progression of gastric cancer

Ying Li 1, Yusong Liu 1, Jie Yao 1, Rui Li 1, Xiaocheng Fan 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7082931  PMID: 32192507

Abstract

Background

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers leading to high cancer mortality. MicroRNA-484 (miR-484) has been evaluated as a biomarker for various types of cancers. The subject of this study is to investigate the functional role of miR-484 in gastric cancer.

Methods

The expression of miR-484 in gastric cancer was analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were employed to explore the prognostic significance of miR-484 in gastric cancer. The functional role of miR-484 in gastric cancer was determined by CCK-8 and Transwell assays.

Results

The results showed that miR-484 was significantly downregulated in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. The downregulation of miR-484 was closely related to differentiation, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and poor prognosis. Cox regression analyses demonstrated that miR-484 was an independent prognosis indicator for gastric cancer patients. Additionally, the downregulation of miR-484 enhanced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in gastric cancer cells.

Conclusion

These data demonstrated that miR-484 can serve as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for gastric cancer and it may be involved in the progression of gastric cancer.

Keywords: Gastric cancer, microRNA-484, Proliferation, Migration, Invasion, Prognosis

Introduction

Gastric Cancer is a kind of common malignancy with poor prognosis worldwide [1]. A variety of factors are reported to be associated with the development of gastric cancer, such as irregular diet, genetic and epigenetic influence [2]. Due to the lack of typical early symptoms, gastric cancer patients are always diagnosed at advanced stages [3]. The detailed knowledge of the molecular characteristics and the identification of new biomarkers are beneficial for the treatment of gastric cancer. Therefore, finding the biomarker for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gastric cancer is of great importance.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs, 20–24 nucleotides in length) are a series of non-coding RNAs, which have vital roles in the regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level via binding to the 3′-UTR of target mRNAs [4]. Meanwhile, miRNAs participate in the regulation of a variety of human proteins, which makes it easier to affect the genetic pathways [5]. Currently, miRNA has been reported to act as oncogenes or anti-oncogenes in the initiation and development of various cancers [6–10]. For example, miR-423-3p acts as an oncogene and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer [11]. MiRNAs also have been demonstrated to be implicated in the development, progression, and metastasis of gastric cancer. MiR-196a could promote the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by targeting SFRP1; miR-383-5p was downregulated and might act as a tumor suppressor for gastric cancer, and miR-374a has been reported to act as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer [12–14].

In the present study, miR-484 was investigated in the regulation of gastric cancer. MiR-484 was suggested to play a role in the progression of lung cancer by inhibiting the apoptosis of the cell [15]. It is also reported that miR-484 inhibits cell proliferation of cervical cancer and breast cancer [16, 17]. Additionally, mir-484 has been demonstrated to be down-regulated in gastric cancer [18–20], however, the specific mechanism of miR-484 on the modulation of gastric cancer has not been reported. Therefore, the subject of this study is to investigate the role of miR-484 in the prognosis and progression of gastric cancer, providing considerable therapeutic strategies against gastric cancer.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples collection

The paired gastric cancer tissue and matched adjacent normal tissue specimens used for the investigation were collected from 124 patients with gastric cancer admitted to Binzhou Medical University Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2013. The isolated samples were confirmed with pathology diagnosis following the International Union against Cancer. The collected tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for further analysis. Additionally, all the patients had not received any anti-tumor therapies, and a 5-year follow up survey was carried to collect the survival status. Meanwhile, the clinicopathological information of the patients, including age, gender, tumor size, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage are listed in Tables 1 and 2. All participants signed written informed consent in this study. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Binzhou Medical University Hospital.

Table 1.

Correlation between miR-484 expression levels and clinical features in gastric cancer patients

Parameters Cases No. (n = 124) miR-484 expression P
Low (n = 69) High (n = 55)
Age
  < 60 63 33 30 0.269
  ≥ 60 61 36 25
Gender
 Male 76 37 39 0.632
 Female 48 32 16
Differentiation
 Well + Moderate 71 29 42 0.006
 Poor 53 40 13
T Stage
 T1-T2 64 34 30 0.388
 T3-T4 60 35 25
Lauren classification
 Intestinal 68 33 25 0.504
 Diffused 56 26 30
Lymph node metastasis
 Negative 57 24 33 0.015
 Positive 67 45 22
Distant metastasis
 Negative 93 47 46 0.005
 Positive 31 22 9
TNM stage
 I - II 55 26 29 0.002
 III - IV 69 43 26
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Multivariate Cox analysis of clinical parameters in relation to overall survival

Characteristics Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P
miR-484 2.868 1.148–7.167 0.024
Age 1.176 0.589–2.350 0.645
Gender 1.276 0.611–2.664 0.517
Differentiation 1.563 0.715–3.413 0.263
T stage 1.529 0.760–3.076 0.234
Lauren classification 1.426 0.707–2.879 0.322
Lymph node metastasis 1.844 0.861–3.953 0.116
Distant metastasis 2.172 1.032–4.570 0.041
TNM stage 2.061 1.029–4.126 0.041
Open in a new tab

Cell lines and transfection

Gastric cancer cell lines (HGC-27, SNU-1, AGS, NCI-N87) and a normal gastric mucous membrane cell line (GES-1) were purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All the cells were incubated in the RPMI1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For the cell transfection, miR-484 mimic, mimic negative control (NC), miR-484 inhibitor, inhibitor NC (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) were used for the overexpression and knockdown of miR-484, and the Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was employed according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The sequence of miR-484 mimic is: 5′-UCAGGCUCAGUCCCCUCCCGAU-3′, and the sequence of miR-484 inhibitor is: 5′- AUCGGGAGGGGACUGAGCCUGA-3′.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

The TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract total RNA of tissues and cells. The extracted RNA reverse transcript to cDNA by a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and stored at − 20 °C. Next, qRT-PCR was utilized to investigate the expression of miR-484 in tissues and cells, which was carried out with the SYBR Green I Master Mix kit (Invitrogen) and ran on the 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The expression level was determined using the 2-ΔΔCt method and normalized to U6.

Cell proliferation assay

The transfection cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with a cell concentration of 5 × 103/ mL per well. At 0, 24, 48, 72 h, 10 μL cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was added to each well, and then incubated in a humidified incubator for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Experiments were repeated in triplicate.

Transwell migration and invasion assay

The 24-well transwell chambers (Multiskan MK3, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) with a pore size of 8 μm polycarbonate membrane was employed to analyze the migration and invasion. For the migration assay, the transfected cells with the concentration of 2 × 105/ml were seeded into the upper compartment and then incubated in the culture medium without FBS at 37 °C for 24 h. While for the invasion assay, the upper chamber was coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The lower chamber was filled the culture medium with 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. After incubating for 48 h, the migrated cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and counted by a microscope.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis of the data was conducted with SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., Chicago, USA). The differences between the two groups are analyzed through Student’s t-test. The correlation of miR-484 with clinicopathological features was evaluated by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the prognostic significance of miR-484. The differences were considered to be significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Expression of miR-484 in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines

The expression of miR-484 was analyzed by qRT-PCR in gastric cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. As shown in Fig. 1a, compared with adjacent normal tissues, miR-484 in gastric cancer tissues was significantly downregulated (P < 0.001). Additionally, the expression of miR-484 in four different gastric cancer cell lines and a normal cell line was investigated. The result showed that the expression of miR-484 in gastric cancer cell lines was lower than that in the normal cell lines, and the difference was significant (P < 0.001, Fig. 1b). The expression of miR-484 was different in four cancer cell lines, with the lowest expression appeared in NCI-N87 cell line, followed by HGC-27 cell line, and the expression of miR-484 in AGS and SNU-1 was a bit higher than that in the other two cell lines. Due to the relatively low expression, NCI-N87 and HGC-27 were selected for the following experiments.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Expression of miR-484 in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. a. Expression of miR-484 was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). b. Expression of miR-484 was decreased in gastric cancer cell lines (HGC-27, SNU-1, AGS, NCI-N87) compared with normal cell line GES-1. (***P < 0.001)

The relationship between the expression of miR-484 and the clinicopathological features of gastric cancer patients

According to the mean expression level of miR-484 (5.617), all 124 gastric cancer patients were divided into two groups: high expression group and low expression group. Next, the relationship between the expression of miR-484 and the clinicopathological features of gastric cancer patients was evaluated through χ2 test, the results are summarized in Table 1. The results revealed that the expression of miR-484 was significantly related to differentiation (P = 0.006), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.015), distant metastasis (P = 0.005) and TNM stage (P = 0.002). Nevertheless, the age and gender of patients were not associated with the expression of miR-484 (all P > 0.05).

Prognostic value of miR-484 in gastric cancer

Based on the expression of miR-484 and the overall survival information of gastric cancer patients from a 5-year follow up survey, the Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to assess the role of miR-484 in the prognosis of gastric cancer. As shown in Fig. 2, the overall survival rate of patients with high expression of miR-484 was much higher than those with low expression of miR-484 (log-rank test P = 0.001). Furthermore, the multivariate Cox’s hazard regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of miR-484 and other clinic clinicopathological features on the survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Results showed that the expression of miR-484 (HR = 2.868, 95% CI = 1.148–7.167, P = 0.024), distant metastasis (HR = 2.172, 95% CI = 1.032–4.570, P = 0.041) and the TNM stage (HR = 2.061, 95% CI = 1.029–4.126, P = 0.041) of patients are independent prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival in gastric cancer patients (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for gastric cancer patients based on the expression of miR-484. P value was calculated using the log-rank test. Patients with low miR-484 expression had a shorter survival time than those with high miR-484 expression

The role of miR-484 in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer

The HGC-27 and NCI-N87 were transfected with miR-484 mimic or miR-484 inhibitor to evaluate the functional role of miR-484 in gastric cancer. The results in Fig. 3a showed that miR-484 mimic increased the expression of miR-484, and miR-484 was downregulated in the presence of miR-484 inhibitor, the difference was significant (P < 0.01). Then the cell proliferation capacity was evaluated through the CCK-8 assay. The proliferation of HGC-27 and NCI-N87 with high miR-484 expression was inhibited, while the cell lines with low miR-484 expression were promoted, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05, Fig. 3b). Meanwhile, the migration and invasion of the cell lines were also investigated. The results suggested that the high expression of miR-484 increased by miR-484 mimic led to an inhibition of migration, whereas the downregulation of miR-484 inhibited by miR-484 inhibitor enhanced the migration, and the same effects were exerted on the invasion of the cell lines (P < 0.01, Fig. 4a and b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of miR-484 on the cell proliferation of HGC-27 and NCI-N87. a. Expression of miR-484 in the presence of miR-484 mimic or miR-484 inhibitor (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001). b. Overexpression of miR-484 inhibited the proliferation of gastric cancer cells (*P < 0.05)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Effect of miR-484 on the migration and invasion of HGC-27 and NCI-N87. a. Knockdown of miR-484 enhances the migration of gastric cancer cells (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). b. Reduction of miR-484 promotes the invasion of gastric cancer cells (***P < 0.001)

Discussion

Gastric cancer is considered to be a highly lethal malignancy, due to its terrible proliferation, migration, and invasion, which can lead to high mortality and poor prognosis. The modular and cellular factors that governing these processes remain unclear [21]. Multiple studies have reported that microRNAs could regulate target mRNAs and its abnormal expression was closely related to the migration, invasion, and proliferation of various cancers [10, 22–24]. For instance, miR-593 can inhibit the migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting SLUG-associated signaling pathways [25]. MiRNAs have different behaviors in various cancers. MiR-601 acts as an oncogene in gastric cancer, which was upregulated and related with the poor prognosis of gastric cancer [26]. On the other hand, miR-601 was also a prognosis marker of breast cancer, because its downregulation could promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells [27]. For gastric cancer, a variety of miRNAs have been reported to play a role in its proliferation, migration, and invasion, such as miR-4317, miR-501-5p, miR-214 and so on [28–30]. Moreover, miR-214 was also demonstrated to enhance the invasion of breast cancer cells, and it was upregulated in breast cancer, which is opposite to the expression in gastric cancer [31].

In the present study, the role of miR-484 in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer was studied, and we found the expression of miR-484 was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with paired adjacent normal tissues. Moreover, the expression of miR-484 was associated with differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage. From these results, it can be inferred that miR-484 may be a tumor suppressor, which is consistent with previous studies [18–20]. Furthermore, the association of miR-484 with tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage of the patients was found, indicating the potential role of miR-484 in the development of gastric cancer. Additionally, based on the survival information and the clinical features of patients, the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analyses were employed to explore the clinical significance of miR-484. From the results, we found that the patients with low expression of miR-484 had shorter survival time, which indicated that the downregulation of miR-484 was associated with poor overall survival.

Previous studies have demonstrated the dysregulation of miRNAs that play roles in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of various cancers. For example, the downregulation of miR-449a exerted inhibitory effect on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer [8]. The overexpression of miR-200 could suppress tumor proliferation in colorectal cancer [32]. Actually, the role of miR-484 in a certain type of cancer is still a controversial issue. Recent research has found the dysregulation of miR-484 in various cancers, and its expression was different. The expression of miR-484 in lung cancer was increased, but it was downregulated in cervical cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma [16, 33, 34]. It also has been reported that miR-484 was highly specific for prostate cancer, which could make it act as a prostate cancer screening biomarker [35]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, miR-484 has an oncogenic role by targeting TUSC5 [36]. Moreover, miR-484 could act as the biomarker for many other cancers, including lung cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer and colorectal cancer [15, 16, 37]. In the present study, the upregulation of miR-484 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells, which suggested that miR-484 might be involved in the progression of gastric cancer.

However, there are also some limitations in our study. Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-484 can reduce the expression of a series of oncogenes, such as ZEB1, SMAD2, etc., inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumor cells, or regulate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling [16, 34, 38]. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying the role of miR-484 should be investigated in further studies. On the other hand, only a limited number of samples were included in the current study and increased sample size should be used in the future to validate the accuracy of miR-484 as a biomarker.

To summarize, the present study indicated the downregulation of miR-484 was associated with the poor overall survival of gastric cancer patients, which makes it possible to act as a candidate prognostic biomarker. The overexpression of miR-484 in gastric cancer leads to inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, indicating that miR-484 may be a therapeutic target for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Acknowledgments

We thank very much Dr. Guo Chen, Dr. Jinliang Wan, Dr. Zhenbo Wang, Dr. Lei Li, Dr. Hongying Jia, Dr. Shaozhi Xing, Dr. Shaoshui Chen for their supports on clinical sample collection and data analysis.

Abbreviations

miR-484

microrna-484

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

miRNAs

MicroRNAs

FBS

Fetal bovine serum

NC

Negative control

CCK-8

Cell counting kit-8

SD

Standard deviation

EMT

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Authors’ contributions

Ying Li and Xiaocheng Fan contributed to conceptualization, methodology, data interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. Ying Li, Yusong Liu, Jie Yao, Rui Li, Xiaocheng Fan conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and the preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

Funding

This work was supported by the fund of Binzhou Medical University Hospital [No. BY2015KJ25].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants signed written informed consent in this study. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Binzhou Medical University Hospital.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from each participant.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Futami T, Kawase T, Mori K, Asaumi M, Kihara R, Shindoh N, et al. Identification of a novel oncogenic mutation of FGFR4 in gastric cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51217-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carcas LaurenPeirce. Gastric cancer review. Journal of Carcinogenesis. 2014;13(1):14. doi: 10.4103/1477-3163.146506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, Kinoshita T, Furukawa H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(33):4387–4393. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang Y, Wang Z, Gemeinhart RA. Progress in microRNA delivery. J Control Release. 2013;172(3):962–974. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(2):102–114. doi: 10.1038/nrg2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li J, Zou X. MiR-652 serves as a prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer and promotes tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion via targeting RORA. Cancer biomarkers. 2019;undefined(undefined):1–9. doi: 10.3233/CBM-190361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang S, Gao B, Yang H, Liu X, Wu X, Wang W. MicroRNA-432 is downregulated in cervical cancer and directly targets FN1 to inhibit cell proliferation and invasion. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(2):1475–1482. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang Lianyun, Zhao Yu, Xiong Wendong, Ye Wen, Zhao Weidong, Hua Ying. MicroRNA-449a Is Downregulated in Cervical Cancer and Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion. Oncology Research and Treatment. 2019;42(11):564–571. doi: 10.1159/000502122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han X, Du C, Chen Y, Zhong X, Wang F, Wang J, et al. Overexpression of miR-939-3p predicts poor prognosis and promotes progression in lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2019;25(4):325–332. doi: 10.3233/CBM-190271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhang T, Wang M, Xu R, Qin S, et al. Overexpression of miR-664 is associated with poor overall survival and accelerates cell proliferation, migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotargets Ther. 2019;12(undefined):2373–2381. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S188658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang R, Li G, Zhuang G, Sun S, Song Z. Overexpression of microRNA-423-3p indicates poor prognosis and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0831-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ji R, Zhang X, Gu H, Ma J, Wen X, Zhou J, et al. MiR-374a-5p: a new target for diagnosis and drug resistance therapy in gastric Cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;18:320–331. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wei C, Gao JJ. Downregulated miR-383-5p contributes to the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells and is associated with poor prognosis. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7882. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Feng C, She J, Chen X, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al. Exosomal miR-196a-1 promotes gastric cancer cell invasion and metastasis by targeting SFRP1. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2019;14:1743–5889. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2019-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li T, Ding ZL, Zheng YL, Wang W. MiR-484 promotes non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progression through inhibiting Apaf-1 associated with the suppression of apoptosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu Y, Xie H, Liu Y, Liu W, Liu M, Tang H. MiR-484 suppresses proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SMAD2 in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
  • 17.Ye F-G, Song C-G, Cao Z-G, Xia C, Chen D-N, Chen L, et al. Cytidine Deaminase Axis modulated by miR-484 differentially regulates cell proliferation and Chemoresistance in breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75(7):1504–1515. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Konishi H, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Tsujiura M, Takeshita H, et al. Detection of gastric cancer-associated microRNAs on microRNA microarray comparing pre- and post-operative plasma. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(4):740–747. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Treece AL, Duncan DL, Tang W, Elmore S, Morgan DR, Dominguez RL, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma microRNA profiles in fixed tissue and in plasma reveal cancer-associated and Epstein-Barr virus-related expression patterns. Lab Investig. 2016;96(6):661–671. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zare A, Ahadi A, Larki P, Omrani MD, Zali MR, Alamdari NM, et al. The clinical significance of miR-335, miR-124, miR-218 and miR-484 downregulation in gastric cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45(6):1587–1595. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garzon AE. MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60(1):167–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.053006.104707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hata A, Kashima R. Dysregulation of microRNA biogenesis machinery in cancer. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;51(3):121–134. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2015.1117054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tavazoie S, Alarcón C, Oskarsson T, Padua D, Wang Q, Bos P, et al. Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008;451(7175):147–152. doi: 10.1038/nature06487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu H, Ma L, Wang J. Overexpression of miR-25 is associated with progression and poor prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(4):2687–2694. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wei F, Wang M, Li Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y. MiR593 inhibits proliferation and invasion and promotes apoptosis in nonsmall cell lung cancer cells by targeting SLUGassociated signaling pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20(undefined):5172–5182. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Min C, Zhang A, Qin J. Increased expression of miR-601 is associated with poor prognosis and tumor progression of gastric cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2019;14(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0882-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hu JY, Yi W, Wei X, Zhang MY, Xu R, Zeng LS, et al. MiR-601 is a prognostic marker and suppresses cell growth and invasion by targeting PTP4A1 in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;79:247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hu X, Zhang M, Miao J, Wang X, Huang C. MiRNA-4317 suppresses human gastric cancer cell proliferation by targeting ZNF322. Cell Biol Int. 2018;42(8):923–930. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang R, Sun Y, Yu W, Yan Y, Qiao M, Jiang R, et al. Downregulation of miRNA-214 in cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells through targeting FGF9 and inducing EMT. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0995-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fan D, Ren B, Yang X, Liu J, Zhang Z. Upregulation of miR-501-5p activates the wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and enhances stem cell-like phenotype in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2016;35(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0432-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang F, Lv P, Liu X, Zhu M, Qiu X. MicroRNA-214 enhances the invasion ability of breast cancer cells by targeting p53. Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(5):1395–1402. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Carter JV, O'Brien SJ, Burton JF, Oxford BG, Stephen V, Hallion J, et al. The microRNA-200 family acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer by inhibiting the tumor suppressor RASSF2. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(4):3994–4007. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Merhautova J, Hezova R, Poprach A, Kovarikova A, Radova L, Svoboda M, et al. MiR-155 and miR-484 Are Associated with Time to Progression in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib. BioMed Res Int. 2015:941980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Zhang Q, Li X, Chen Z. LncRNA H19 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by targeting miR-484 in human lung cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(6):4447–4457. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guo X, Han T, Hu P, Zhu C, Wang Y, Chang S. Five microRNAs in serum as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer risk assessment and therapeutic intervention. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(12):2193–2200. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-2009-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang S, Wang W, Han X, Wang Y, Ge Y, Tan Z. Dysregulation of miR484-TUSC5 axis takes part in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Biochem. 2019;166(3):271–279. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvz034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xie S, Ge Q, Wang X, Sun X, Kang Y. Long non-coding RNA ZFAS1 sponges miR-484 to promote cell proliferation and invasion in colorectal cancer. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(2):154–161. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1407895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yi R, Feng J, Yang S, Huang X, Liao Y, Hu Z, et al. MiR-484/MAP2/c-Myc-positive regulatory loop in glioma promotes tumor-initiating properties through ERK1/2 signaling. J Mol Histol. 2018;49(2):209–218. doi: 10.1007/s10735-018-9760-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Diagnostic Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES