Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2020 Mar 9;26:e920711-1–e920711-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.920711

Incidence and Risk Factors for Suicide Death among Kaposi’s Sarcoma Patients: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis

Jian Shen 1,2,A,B,C,D,E,*, Mingjian Zhu 1,2,C,D,F,*, Sihao Li 3,D,E, Qiangqiang Wang 1,2,D,E,F, Jingjing Wu 1,2,E,F, Yating Li 1,2,E,F, Qing Wang 1,2,C,D, Xiaoyuan Bian 1,2,C,D, Liya Yang 1,2,E,F, Xianwan Jiang 1,2,E,F, Jiaojiao Xie 1,2,C,D, Yanmeng Lu 1,2,C,D, Kaicen Wang 1,2,E,F, Lanjuan Li 1,2,A,E,G,
PMCID: PMC7083084  PMID: 32148334

Abstract

Background

The suicide risk of patients with cancer is higher than the general population. Our research aimed to explore the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to define incidence and quest risk factors for death of suicide in patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) in the United States (US).

Material/Methods

We screened KS patients without human immunodeficiency virus status in the SEER database from 1980 to 2016, calculated the standardized mortality ratios of them by comparing the rates with those of the US general population from 1980 to 2016, and identified relevant suicide risk factors by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

The suicide rates of KS patients and US general population were 115.31 (110 suicides among 21 405 patients) and 15.1 per 100 000 person-years, respectively, thus the standardized mortality ratio was 7.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.28–9.21). The multivariate analysis showed that black race (versus white race, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21–0.89, P=0.022), advanced age at diagnosis (≥55 years versus 18–44 years, HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.66, P=0.002), and chemotherapy (versus no chemotherapy, HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37–0.96, P=0.032) were protective factors for suicide among KS patients.

Conclusions

Clinicians and caregivers can apply our findings to identify KS patients with high suicide risk characteristics (white race, age of 18–44 years, non-chemotherapy) and exert timely interventions during patient diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up to reduce the suicide rate in this population.

MeSH Keywords: Risk Factors; Sarcoma, Kaposi; SEER Program; Suicide

Background

Suicide, one of the common causes of death in the United States (US) [1], is a complex behavior influenced by psychological, physiological, environmental, social, and cultural factors [2]. Previous studies have shown that people who were diagnosed with cancer may have increased risks of suicide ideas and attempt suicide [35], and patients with cancer and poor prognosis were more likely to feel desperate and depressed and subsequently committed suicide [4]. Several studies have shown that the rate of suicide in patients with cancer was nearly twice compared with that in the general population in the USA [6,7]. Another study revealed that the incidence of suicide was more than 3-fold higher in head and neck cancers patients than in the US general population [8].

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is an endothelial cell carcinoma that is etiologically linked to human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8) [9], which included 4 forms: 1) classic KS; 2) African KS; 3) AIDS-related KS; 4) iatrogenic KS. Classic KS is common among elderly Jewish, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative men [10]. With the spread of AIDS epidemic, the KS incidence increased in 1980 and peaked in the late 1980s, becoming increasingly common in young patients with AIDS and weakened immune systems. However, after the antiretroviral therapy (ART) was widely used from 1996, the KS incidence dropped dramatically [11,12].

KS can cause skin lesions of purple, red, or brown spots, most often on the legs or face, but they can also develop in other parts of the body [13,14]. These skin lesions are very prominent and may attract attention from colleagues or passersby, which is a huge social and psychological burden for the patient. It has been suggested that KS-associated skin lesions can significantly affect quality of life [15,16], which may potentially increase risk of suicide in this group of patients. However, these is no dedicated study investigating the suicide incidence in patients with KS.

The National Cancer Institute’s SEER program is a coordinated system of population-based state cancer registries that collects information on all cancer patients in representative geographical areas in the US [17], which includes 18 registries covering 30% of the US population [18]. Therefore, the SEER database may be used to explore the association between KS patients and the suicide behavior of them. Our study aimed to define the suicide rate and explore potential risk factors related with suicide in patients with KS by using SEER database.

Material and Methods

Patient selection

The SEER database provides registered researchers with information such as patient demographics, clinical data, and prognosis for free, but does not provide HIV status. We obtained a license to access the database after signing and submitting the SEER Research Data Agreement form. Then, we used SEER*Stat 8.3.4 to retrieve the data. Finally, we searched the patients with KS older than 18 years from the SEER database (1980–2016) by using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O-3) histological type code 9140. All patients with KS were included, and 110 patients who died by suicide were identified. We excluded people for whom age was unknown, people for whom KS was diagnosed by autopsy or death certificate and people for whom KS was not the primary cancer. We identified 21 405 eligible patients in the database (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The flow diagram of patient selection. KS – Kaposi’s sarcoma; SEER – Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; ICD-O-3 – International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition.

Covariates

We collected the information of interest about KS patients, including gender (male, female), the year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis (18–44, 45–54, ≥55 years old), race (black, white, other, unknown), marital status (married; single; divorced, separated or widowed [DSW]; unknown), tumor risk classification, surgery (yes, no, unknown), radiotherapy (yes, no, unknown), and chemotherapy (yes, no/unknown) by using the SEER*Stat software. We used the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) staging criteria to classify the risk of tumor. T0 indicated that patients had low tumor risk and had single or multiple skin lesions. T1 indicated that patients were considered to have a high risk of tumor, with single or multiple lesions in the mucosal tissue (e.g., mouth, anus, vagina, and others) or internal organs (e.g., lung, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, and others). Tuk indicated that the risk of tumor was unknown in patients with multiple lesions in nonspecific sites or unknown number and location of the tumor [10].

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS (version 22.0) software for the statistical analyses. By dividing the number of suicides in each category subset by the cumulative total survival time (in person year) of patients in that subset, the suicide rate per 100 000 person-years can be calculated. We calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by determining the rate of suicides in the KS patients to suicides in the US general population. The total and subgroup rates of KS patients were compared with those of the US general population. Additionally, we divided patients into the following groups: death for suicide and death for other causes. We used the χ2-test to assess the differences in the patient features between these 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for suicide death. Only the variables with a P value <0.1 in the univariate logistic regression models were analyzed in multivariate logistic regression models. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient baseline characteristics

Overall, we identified 21 405 patients with KS from the SEER database from 1980–2016. Among them, 110 patients died of suicide, 15 429 patients died of other reasons, and 5866 patients were alive. Of those, 16 750 patients (78.3%) were white, and 3483 patients (16.3%) were black. Single was the predominant marital status. A total of 3793 patients (17.7%) underwent surgery, 4055 patients (18.9%) received radiotherapy, and 15 709 patients (73.4%) did not receive chemotherapy. All individuals who died by suicide were male. Regarding race, 99 patients (90.0%) were white, and 8 patients (7.3%) were black. Similarly, single was the predominant marital status. There were 15 patients (13.6%) who underwent surgery, 21 patients (19.1%) received radiotherapy, and 22 patients (20.0%) received chemotherapy. The patient demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of Kaposi’s sarcoma patients.

Variables Overall
N (%)
Nonsuicidal death
N (%)
Suicide death
N (%)
Alive
N (%)
Patients 21405 15429 110 5866
Marital status
 Married 2019 (9.4%) 1255 (8.1%) 5 (4.5%) 759 (12.9%)
 Single 15 440 (72.1%) 11 768 (76.3%) 89 (80.9%) 3583 (61.1%)
 DSW# 1563 (7.3%) 1202 (7.8%) 8 (7.3%) 353 (6.0%)
 Unknown 2383 (11.1%) 1204 (7.8%) 8 (7.3%) 1171 (20.0%)
Sex
 Male 20 420 (95.4%) 14 800 (95.9%) 110 (100.0%) 5510 (93.9%)
 Female 985 (4.6%) 629 (4.1%) 0 (0.0%) 356 (6.1%)
Race
 White 16 750 (78.3%) 12 547 (81.3%) 99 (90.0%) 4104 (70.0%)
 Black 3483 (16.3%) 2347 (15.2%) 8 (7.3%) 1128 (19.2%)
 Other 697 (3.3%) 457 (3.0%) 2 (1.8%) 238 (4.1%)
 Unknown 475 (2.2%) 78 (0.5%) 1 (0.9%) 396 (6.8%)
Tumor risk classification##
 T0 7859 (36.7%) 4972 (32.2%) 36 (32.7%) 2851 (48.6%)
 T1 5538 (25.9%) 4213 (27.3%) 24 (21.8%) 1301 (22.2%)
 Tuk 8008 (37.4%) 6244 (40.5%) 50 (45.5%) 1714 (29.2%)
Surgery
 Yes 3793 (17.7%) 2304 (14.9%) 15 (13.6%) 1474 (25.1%)
 No 17 591 (82.2%) 13 117 (85.0%) 95 (86.4%) 4379 (74.7%)
 Unknown 21 (0.1%) 8 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 13 (0.2%)
Radiotherapy
 Yes 4055 (18.9%) 3358 (21.8%) 21 (19.1%) 676 (11.5%)
 No 17 281 (80.7%) 12 032 (78.0%) 88 (80.0%) 5161 (88.0%)
 Unknown 69 (0.3%) 39 (0.3%) 1 (0.9%) 29 (0.5%)
Chemotherapy
 Yes 5696 (26.6%) 4364 (28.3%) 22 (20.0%) 1310 (22.3%)
 No/Unknown 15 709 (73.4%) 11 065 (71.7%) 88 (80.0%) 4556 (77.7%)
Age at diagnosis
 18–44 14 731 (68.8%) 11 149 (72.3%) 83 (75.5%) 3499 (59.6%)
 45–54 3464 (16.2%) 2260 (14.6%) 19 (17.3%) 1185 (20.2%)
 ≥55 3210 (15.0%) 2020 (13.1%) 8 (7.3%) 1182 (20.2%)
*

DSW – divorced, separated or widowed.

**

T0 – means the patients had good tumor risk;

T1 – means patients had poor tumor risk; Tnk – means the risk of tumor was unknown.

Patient suicide incidence

From 1980 to 2016, 110 of 21 405 KS patients committed suicide for an observed 95 397 person-years, and the incidence of suicide was 115.31 per 100 000 person-years. The age-, sex-, and race-adjusted suicide rate in US general population during the corresponding period was 15.1. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of KS patients was 7.64 (95% CI, 6.28–9.21; P<0.001). Males (SMR, 4.85; 95% CI, 3.99–5.85; P<0.001), single individuals (SMR, 9.45; 95% CI, 7.59–11.63; P<0.001) and DSW individuals (SMR, 8.35; 95% CI, 3.57–16.53; P<0.001) had higher suicide rates than corresponding US general population. Age at diagnosis, race, treatment method, and tumor risk classification were not associated with increased suicide incidence (Table 2).

Table 2.

Suicide rate among patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma.

Variables Suicide death Person – years Suicide rate P SMR### 95% CI
Total 110 95 396.63 115.31 <0.001*** 7.64 6.28–9.21
Marital status
 Married 5 12 752.08 39.21 0.09 2.60 0.82–6.11
 Single 89 62392.67 142.64 <0.001*** 9.45 7.59–11.63
 DSW# 8 6345.83 126.07 <0.001*** 8.35 3.57–16.53
 Unknown 8 13 906.00 57.53 0.006** 3.81 1.63–7.54
Sex
 Male 110 90 322.67 121.79 <0.001*** 4.85 3.99–5.85
 Female 0 5073.96 0
Race
 White 99 74 811.92 132.33 <0.001*** 8.02 6.52–9.77
 Black 8 14 473.92 55.27 <0.001*** 7.47 3.19–14.79
 Other 2 3328.08 60.09 0.08 6.83 0.64–25.11
 Unknown
Tumor risk classification##
 T0 36 43 537.17 82.69 <0.001*** 5.48 3.83–7.59
 T1 24 19 810.67 121.15 <0.001*** 8.02 5.13–11.95
 Tuk 50 32 048.75 156.01 <0.001*** 10.33 7.67–13.63
Surgery
 Yes 15 24 028.08 62.43 <0.001*** 4.13 2.31–6.84
 No 95 71 267.42 133.30 <0.001*** 8.83 7.14–10.79
 Unknown 0 101.13 0
Radiotherapy
 Yes 21 16 765.58 125.26 <0.001*** 8.30 5.13–12.70
 No 88 78 238.67 112.48 <0.001*** 7.45 5.97–9.18
 Unknown 1 392.29 254.91 0.13 16.88 0.007–96.8
Chemotherapy
 Yes 22 22 209.58 99.06 <0.001*** 6.56 4.11–9.95
 No/Unknown 88 73 187.00 120.24 <0.001*** 7.96 6.39–9.81
Age at diagnosis
 18–44 83 61 613.04 134.71 <0.001*** 9.76 7.77–12.11
 45–54 19 15 893.54 119.55 <0.001*** 7.11 4.28–11.13
 ≥55 8 17 890.04 44.72 0.03 2.69 1.15–5.33
#

DSW – divorced, separated or widowed.

##

T0 – means the patients had good tumor risk; T1 – means patients had poor tumor risk; Tnk – means the risk of tumor was unknown.

###

SMR – standardized mortality ratio: reference population (age-, sex-, and race-adjusted US general population from 1980 to 2016).

**

P<0.01;

***

P<0.001.

In terms of time periods, we discovered that the SMR of patients with KS remained at approximately 10–20 from 1980–1995; however, the first significant decrease in the SMR (1.98, 95% CI: 0.37–5.88) occurred from 1996–1997. Since then, SMR in patients with KS has generally declined despite fluctuations (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Standardized mortality ratio of suicide for Kaposi’s sarcoma patients during 1980–2016.

Factors associated with suicide

The univariable analysis results showed that advanced age at diagnosis (≥55 versus 18–44, HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.26–1.10, P=0.089), black race (versus white race, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21–0.89, P=0.023), chemotherapy (versus no chemotherapy, HR: 0.634, 95% CI: 0.40–1.01, P=0.056) and early diagnosis were associated with low risks of suicide. According to the multivariate analysis, black race (versus white race, HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21–0.89, P=0.022), advanced age at diagnosis (≥55 versus 18–44, HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.66, P=0.002), chemotherapy (versus no chemotherapy, HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.37–0.96, P=0.032) and surviving 2 years after the diagnosis were protective factors. Conversely, apparent associations of sex, marital status, tumor risk classification, surgery, and radiotherapy were not found in KS patients (Table 3).

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses of patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma.

Variables Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI)
Marital status
 Married Reference
 Single 0.16 1.90 (0.77–4.68)
 DSW# 0.37 1.67 (0.54–5.12)
 Unknown 0.37 1.67 (0.54–5.12)
Sex
 Male Reference
 Female 0.99 0.00
Race
 White Reference Reference
 Black 0.02* 0.43 (0.21–0.89) 0.02* 0.43 (0.21–0.89)
 Other 0.41 0.55 (0.14–2.26) 0.51 0.63 (0.15–2.55)
 Unknown 0.63 1.62 (0.22–11.80) 0.70 1.48 (0.20–10.88)
Tumor risk classification##
 T0 Reference
 T1 0.36 0.79 (0.47–1.32)
 Tuk 0.65 1.11 (0.72–1.70)
Surgery
 Yes 0.70 0.90 (0.52–1.55)
 No Reference
 Unknown 1.00 0.00
Radiotherapy
 Yes 0.52 0.86 (0.53–1.38)
 No Reference
 Unknown 0.22 3.51 (0.48–25.80)
Chemotherapy
 Yes 0.06* 0.63 (0.40–1.01) 0.03* 0.60 (0.37–0.96)
 No/Unknown Reference Reference
Age at diagnosis
 18–44 Reference Reference
 45–54 0.63 1.13 (0.68–1.86) 0.80 1.07 (0.64–1.77)
 ≥55 0.09* 0.53 (0.26–1.10) 0.002** 0.31 (0.14–0.66)
Years elapsed from diagnosis
<1 0.001** 0.30 (0.15–0.61) <0.001*** 0.25 (0.12–0.50)
<2 0.05* 0.49 (0.24–1.00) 0.01* 0.39 (0.19–0.80)
<3 0.22 0.61 (0.28–1.35) 0.09 0.49 (0.22–1.11)
<4 0.47 0.72 (0.29–1.79) 0.29 0.61 (0.24–1.53)
<5 0.48 0.68 (0.24–1.98) 0.35 0.60 (0.21–1.74)
<6 0.64 0.76 (0.24–2.41) 0.63 0.75 (0.24–2.39)
<7 0.22 0.27 (0.04–2.14) 0.22 0.27 (0.04–2.14)
<8 0.63 1.32 (0.42–4.20) 0.66 1.30 (0.41–4.14)
<9 0.93 1.06 (0.29–3.83) 0.84 1.14 (0.31–4.14)
<10 0.52 1.53 (0.42–5.56) 0.43 1.68 (0.46–6.14)
≥10 Reference Reference
#

DSW – divorced, separated or widowed.

#

T0 – means the patients had good tumor risk; T1 – means patients had poor tumor risk; Tnk – means the risk of tumor was unknown.

*

P<0.1;

**

P<0.01;

***

P<0.001.

Discussion

Higher suicide risks in cancer populations had been verified by previous studies from different countries [7,19,20]. In the US, the rate of suicide in the general population is only half of that in cancer patients [6,7]. In addition, HIV-infection is associated with increased morbidity and risks of depression, also leading to higher risk of suicide than the general population [21]. It has been shown that classic KS accounts for over 90% in patients aged > 60 years or older [22,23]. In our study, 15% of the patients were diagnosed with KS at an age > 55 years, suggesting that classic KS only account for a small proportion of our patients. Therefore, we conclude that most KS cases in our study were caused by HIV infection despite that our study lacks the HIV status. According to our study, the suicide rate in KS patients was 115.31 per 100 000 person-years, and the SMR was 7.64 (95% CI, 6.28–9.21), indicating that the suicide risk was clearly increased compared with the US general population, which is 16.7/100 000 person-years [7].

We compared the rate of suicide in patients with KS and the US general population and defined which factors were related to a higher suicide incidence. Our research revealed that all individuals who died by suicide were male, the suicide rate of them was 121.79 per 100 000 person-years, which is consistent with the results in other types of cancer patients [24,25]. The study by Kendal analyzed patients in the SEER registries during 1973–2001 and found the suicide HR for males was 6.2 [26]. Nock et al. [27] reported that women had a higher nonfatal self-injuries rate than men, but men had a higher suicide rate than women. This trend is often ascribed to the fact that men engage in more lethal and violent methods of suicide than women [28]. We also found that the suicide rates of singles (SMR=9.45, P<0.001) and DSW (SMR=8.35, P<0.001) individuals were higher than those of married individuals. Compared with unmarried individuals, married individuals generally have an increased cancer-specific survival rate and decreased mortality [29,30]. which could be because married individuals generally have better socioeconomic status and more social support than unmarried individuals [3133]. Therefore, new treatment methods are often firstly used in the groups with better economic and social status, which may lead to a gap in the prognosis of the disease. With the development of medicine, new treatment methods have spread to people with a relatively low social and economic status, and the gap is expected to narrow. Therefore, this may partly explain that the SMR of married individuals is lower than that of unmarried individuals.

KS is different from other tumors (such as kidney cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, etc.) in staging. The ACTG applied the extent of tumor (T), the severity of immunosuppression (I), and other HIV-related systemic diseases (S) to stage it. However, we only obtained data on the extent of tumor through the SEER database, and we cannot evaluate the other 2 indicators. In fact, the immune situation and other HIV-related systemic diseases had a significant effect on the prognosis of KS patients, so classifying the risk of tumor by the tumor extent will have a certain bias in results.

In our study, the change in the suicide rate in patients with KS over time should be noted. In Figure 2, the SMR peaked in the late 1980s, then declined from 1990, and reached its first trough in 1996–1997 (SMR: 1.98, 95% CI: 0.37–0.5.88). Since then, although SMR in patients with KS has fluctuated, it has generally declined compared with that before 1990. Previous studies have shown that since the introduction of antiretroviral therapy in early 1990, the efficacy of this treatment has gradually increased, thereby improving the immunity of KS patients with HIV infection and reducing the risk of them. From 1996, ART therapy has been used in most cases of KS [34,35]. The treatment of KS with ART has a certain effect on the survival rate, but long-term adherence is also necessary for successful treatment [36]. Moreover, chemotherapy or radiotherapy has been used as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of patients with KS. Therefore, differences in treatment compliance may have led to the fluctuations in the SMR after 1996, especially the acceptance of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain information about sexual partners of KS patients, especially high-risk population related to the incidence of KS. Thus, we could not assess the impact of sexual partners on SMR of suicide in KS patients.

As shown in table of logistic regression analyses (Table 3), race is a factor associated with suicide. Previous studies have shown that the suicide rates of white and black races are 13 and 6 per 100 000 person-years, respectively [37]. Our research also shows that the black race had lower risk of suicide than the white race, which may be due to religious beliefs, support from family and the culture of refusal to commit suicide [38]. Another unpredicted finding is that the suicide risk in KS patients within the 2 years after diagnosis appears to be relatively lower, suggesting that a recent diagnosis could be a low risk factor for suicide. In contrast, a previous study found that the suicide risk after the diagnosis decreases over time [39]. In fact, the mortality rate of KS is high, thus considerable patients may die in the early stage of the disease and have no opportunity to commit suicide, which leads to the deviation of the statistical results and underestimation of suicide risk in the recently diagnosed patients.

In addition, we found that patients aged 55 years and older had a lower suicide rate than those aged 18 to 44 years. Cancer patients of different ages respond differently to cancer and treatments. Compared with young patients, the incidence of anxiety and pain in elderly patients is relatively low [40]. Young patients should receive psychological risk education of cancer-related suicide as early as possible to ensure that patients realize their thoughts and feelings are not uncommon. They can avoid suicide that is due to fear of discrimination by people and society, psychological stress and other reasons by communicating with their families and medical caregivers [41]. Chemotherapy is another influencing factor for suicide. In addition to ART as an essential treatment, combination with chemotherapy could further improve the prognosis of KS patients [35]. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain information about specific chemotherapy drugs for patients with KS through the SEER database, so we could not analyze the impact of different chemotherapy regimens on suicide rates in the KS patients.

The suicide behavior of cancer patients is affected by various factors, especially psychosocial factors. Previous published studies have confirmed that patients with cancer have higher prevalence of depression than the general population, and severe depression have a nonnegligible effect on suicidal behavior. This is also true for patients with KS. Based on our findings, we recommend a psychiatric assessment of KS patients. At present, some tools can be used to identify the risk of depression, including the Beck Depression Scale [25]. Psychotherapy should be provided to cancer patients at risk of depression as soon as possible, which can reduce the suicide risk and improve the quality of life. Moreover, family member and social support for patients can help reduce the psychological burden of patients, thereby further preventing suicide.

There are some limitations to our research. The SEER database lacks information on social and economic status, sexual orientation, sexual partner, HIV status, and drug treatment (especially ART) of these patients, which may have important effects on suicidal behavior. In addition, the lack of data on suicide failure may lead to bias in the assessment of suicide risk. Besides, our study collected only cancer patient-related data in the US.

Conclusions

Our study explored independent risk factors for suicide in KS patients. Clinicians and caregivers can apply our findings to identify KS patients with high suicide risk characteristics (white race, age of 18–44 years, non-chemotherapy) and exert timely interventions during patient diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up to reduce the suicide rate in this population. Further analysis of KS patients with known HIV status is needed to understand the potential effect of HIV infection on suicide incidence.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge that the SEER program provided effective data that is useful for research.

Footnotes

Source of support: This report is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81790631, 81570512), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC2000500) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LQ19H030007)

Conflict of interests

None.

References

  • 1.Heron M. Deaths: Leading causes for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66:1–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperative. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Allebeck P, Bolund C. Suicides and suicide attempts in cancer patients. Psychol Med. 1991;21:979–84. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700029962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Pessin H, et al. Depression, hopelessness, and desire for hastened death in terminally ill patients with cancer. JAMA. 2000;284:2907–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.22.2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walker J, Waters RA, Murray G, et al. Better off dead: Suicidal thoughts in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4725–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anguiano L, Mayer DK, Piven ML, et al. A literature review of suicide in cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35:E14–26. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31822fc76c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Misono S, Weiss NS, Fann JR, et al. Incidence of suicide in persons with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4731–38. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.8941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kam D, Salib A, Gorgy G, et al. Incidence of suicide in patients with head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141:1075–81. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Antman K, Chang Y. Kaposi’s sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1027–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004063421407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Datta GD, Kawachi I, Delpierre C, et al. Trends in Kaposi’s sarcoma survival disparities in the United States: 1980 through 2004. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2718–26. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eltom MA, Jemal A, Mbulaiteye SM, et al. Trends in Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma incidence in the United States from 1973 through 1998. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1204–10. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grulich AE, Li Y, McDonald AM, et al. Decreasing rates of Kaposi’s sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the era of potent combination anti-retroviral therapy. AIDS. 2001;15:629–33. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200103300-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lima CT, Araujo PSR, Teixeira HM, et al. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, staging, and outcomes of individuals with AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma at an university hospital. An Bras Dermatol. 2017;92:172–76. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20175377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yazici S, Zorlu O, Bulbul Baskan E, et al. Retrospective analysis of 91 Kaposi’s sarcoma cases: A single-center experience and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2018;234:205–13. doi: 10.1159/000492112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harris AH, Osborne RH, Streeton CL, et al. Quality of life and Kaposi sarcoma: Using preference techniques to value the health gains from treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2002;10:486–93. doi: 10.1007/s00520-002-0363-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaik F, Uldrick TS, Esterhuizen T, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients treated with antiretroviral therapy only versus chemotherapy and antiretroviral therapy for HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma: A randomized control trial. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1–9. doi: 10.1200/JGO.18.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duggan MA, Anderson WF, Altekruse S, et al. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program and pathology: Toward strengthening the critical relationship. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:e94–102. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang J, Chen S, Li Y, et al. Incidence rate and risk factors for suicide death in patients with skin malignant melanoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis. Melanoma Res. :2018. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000559. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yousaf U, Christensen MLM, Engholm G, et al. Suicides among Danish cancer patients 1971–1999. Brit J Cancer. 2005;92:995–1000. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Henson KE, Brock R, Charnock J, et al. Risk of suicide after cancer diagnosis in England. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:51–60. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Croxford S, Kitching A, Desai S, et al. Mortality and causes of death in people diagnosed with HIV in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy compared with the general population: An analysis of a national observational cohort. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2:e35–46. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dal Maso L, Polesel J, Ascoli V, et al. Classic Kaposi’s sarcoma in Italy, 1985–1998. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:188–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shiels MS, Pfeiffer RM, Hall HI, et al. Proportions of Kaposi sarcoma, selected non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and cervical cancer in the United States occurring in persons with AIDS, 1980–2007. JAMA. 2011;305:1450–59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guo C, Zheng W, Zhu W, et al. Risk factors associated with suicide among kidney cancer patients: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis. Cancer Med. 2019;8:5386–96. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klaassen Z, Goldberg H, Chandrasekar T, et al. Changing trends for suicidal death in patients with bladder cancer: A 40+ year population-level analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:206–12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kendal WS. Suicide and cancer: A gender-comparative study. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:381–87. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al. Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:133–54. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxn002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fisher LB, Overholser JC, Dieter L. Methods of committing suicide among 2,347 people in Ohio. Death Stud. 2015;39:39–43. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2013.851130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP, et al. Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3869–76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Niu Q, Lu Y, Wu Y, et al. The effect of marital status on the survival of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma: A SEER database analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e11378. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goldzweig G, Andritsch E, Hubert A, et al. Psychological distress among male patients and male spouses: What do oncologists need to know? Ann Oncol. 2010;21:877–83. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP. Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: A review. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:5–19. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wyke S, Ford G. Competing explanations for associations between marital status and health. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:523–32. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90208-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bernstein WB, Little RF, Wilson WH, et al. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related malignancies in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Int J Hematol. 2006;84:3–11. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.06088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Di Lorenzo G, Konstantinopoulos PA, Pantanowitz L, et al. Management of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:167–76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70036-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lima VD, Harrigan R, Bangsberg DR, et al. The combined effect of modern highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens and adherence on mortality over time. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(5):529–36. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31819675e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xu J, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, et al. Deaths: Final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;64:1–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Neeleman J, Wessely S, Lewis G. Suicide acceptability in African- and white Americans: The role of religion. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:12–16. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199801000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Smith DP, Calopedos R, Bang A, et al. Increased risk of suicide in New South Wales men with prostate cancer: Analysis of linked population-wide data. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kiffel J, Sher L. Prevention and management of depression and suicidal behavior in men with prostate cancer. Front Public Health. 2015;3:28. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J, He G, Chen S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for suicide death in male patients with genital-system cancer in the United States. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1969–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES