Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as microvesicles (MIVs) play an important role in intercellular communications. MIVs are small membrane vesicles sized 100–1000 nm in diameter that are released by many types of cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), tumor cells and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC). As EVs can carry out autocrine and paracrine functions by controlling multiple cell processes, it is conceivable that EVs can be used as delivery vehicles for treating several clinical conditions, such as to improve cardiac angiogenesis after myocardial infarction (MI). Here, we seek to investigate whether ADSC-derived MIVs contain microRNAs that regulate angiogenesis and affect cell migration of endothelial cells. We first characterized the ADSC-derived MIVs and found that the MIVs had a size range of 100–300 nm, and expressed the MIV marker protein Alix. We then analyzed the microRNAs in ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs and demonstrated that ADSC-derived MIVs selectively released a panel of microRNAs, several of which were related to angiogenesis, including two members of the let-7 family. Furthermore, we demonstrated that ADSC-derived MIVs promoted the cell migration and invasion of the HUVEC endothelial cells. The PKH26-labeled ADSC-derived MIVs were effectively uptaken into the cytoplasm of HUVEC cells. Collectively, our results demonstrate that the ADSC-derived MIVs can promote migration and invasion abilities of endothelial cells, suggesting pro-angiogenetic potential. Future studies should focus on investigating the roles and mechanisms through which ADSC-derived MIVs regulate angiogenesis.
Keywords: Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), Angiogenesis, Let-7, microRNA, Microvesicle (MIV)
Introduction
Increasing evidence indicates that intercellular communication is an essential hallmark of multicellular organisms and can be mediated through direct cell-cell contact or transfer of secreted molecules, namely extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as exosomes and microvesicles (MIVs).1, 2, 3, 4 EVs are composed of a lipid bilayer containing transmembrane proteins, RNA, DNA, lipids, and metabolites that can be transferred to recipient cells and exert functional effects on target molecules either immediately or after EV fusion and/or endosomal uptake. EVs, also called microvesicles, ectosomes, or microparticles, can be formed and released by budding from the cells' plasma membrane and display a large range of sizes (100–1,000 nm in diameter). Conversely, exosomes are vesicles <150 nm in diameter and are enriched in endosome-derived components.1, 2, 3, 4
EVs can serve autocrine and paracrine functions by controlling multiple cell processes in development, proliferation, migration, and pathology.1, 2, 3, 4 EVs are formed by multiple biogenesis mechanisms, which is likely to affect their cargo content. Furthermore, the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) is a highly conserved process exploited by diverse organisms as a mode of intercellular communication.1, 2, 3, 4 It is conceivable that EVs can be used as delivery vehicles for treating several clinical conditions, such as to improve cardiac angiogenesis after myocardial infarction (MI). MI is the major cause of mortality in the world.5, 6, 7 For example, China has 23 million patients with cardiovascular diseases and approximately 3 million patients die from this condition each year.8, 9 Thus, in addition to conventional therapies,10, 11 novel and efficacious treatments for cardiovascular diseases are needed, such as stem cell therapy.12, 13, 14 The recovery of myocardial damage after MI is closely related to the state of blood vessels,15 and stem cell therapy may promote angiogenesis and improve the blood supply.16, 17
Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are mesenchymal stem cells that can be easily isolated from adipose tissue, and have become the main source of stem cell-based therapies.18, 19, 20 Several studies examined the potential effects of ADSCs on angiogenesis,21, 22, 23 and potential application in cardiovascular diseases.24 ADSCs can promote angiogenesis by differentiating into endothelial cells. ADSCs can also secrete factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and angiogenin (ANG),19 to influence the tissue microenvironment and promote angiogenesis, suggesting that the use of ADSCs is safe and feasible.25
In this study, we seek to investigate whether ADSC-derived MIVs contain microRNAs that regulate angiogenesis and affect cell migration of endothelial cells. ADSC cells can secrete different sizes of MIVs with diameters ranging from 30 nm to 1 μm packed in lipid vesicles.26, 27, 28 MIVs from several cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells and cancer cells, can promote angiogenesis by stimulating endothelial cells or changing the microenvironment.29 As discussed above, MIVs play an important role of transferring information between cells,30 and contain proteins, microRNAs, and mRNAs, which are secreted by cells in a selective manner.26 MIVs were shown to play a role in the transfer of information by releasing their content into the target cells, and then induce epigenetic changes in the target cells.31
Here, we characterized the ADSC-derived MIVs and found that the MIVs had a size range of 100–300 nm, and expressed the protein Alix. We further analyzed the microRNAs in ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs and demonstrated that ADSC-derived MIVs selectively released microRNAs, and were rich in microRNAs related to angiogenesis, including two members of the let-7 family. To verify the role of ADSC-derived MIVs in angiogenesis, we demonstrated that ADSC-derived MIVs promoted the cell migration and invasion of the HUVEC cells. Furthermore, using PKH26-labeled ADSC-derived MIVs we revealed that the labeled ADSC-derived MIV were uptaken into the cellular cytoplasm of HUVEC cells. Collectively, these results indicate that ADSC-derived MIVs can promote the migration and invasion abilities of endothelial cells, suggesting pro-angiogenetic potential. Future studies should focus on investigating the roles and mechanisms through which ADSC-derived MIVs regulate angiogenesis.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and chemicals
Human ADSCs were cultured in human ADSC growth medium (Cyagen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and 100 μg/ml glutamine. Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured in DMEM (Hyclone, USA) containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. All cells were maintained in the humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
MIV isolation
MIV isolation was carried out as previously described.26, 27, 28 Human ADSCs were cultured as described above and allowed to reach 80% confluence in T75 flasks. The cells were then washed three times with PBS, and incubated with fresh human ADSC growth medium containing 10% FBS. After 48 h incubation the conditioned media were collected, and the MIVs were collected by centrifugation. Briefly, the collected media were centrifuged at 300×g for 10 min at 4 °C, 1200×g for 20 min at 4 °C, and 10,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C to eliminate cell debris; and the supernatants were then collected and ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C, followed by being washed in PBS, and ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C. The precipitation was designated as MIVs, which were resuspended with sterile PBS and stored at −80 °C prior to the use.
Morphological and size analyses of MIVs
Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to determine the morphology of MIVs. Briefly, the isolated MIVs were resuspended in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, stored at 4 °C overnight, and then ultracentrifuged at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded. The MIVs were resuspended and ultracentrifuged sequentially in the presence of 15%, 30%, 60% and 80% ethanol to be dehydrated. After the last centrifugation step, the MIVs were resuspended in 0.5 ml of 100% ethanol and stored at room temperature overnight, and then subjected to Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM; Nova NanoSEM 450 instrument; FEI) on aluminum substrate after gold-palladium sputtering.
For the size distribution analysis, the MIVs were resuspended in 1 ml PBS and subjected to the Nano Particle Size Analyzer (PSA NANO2590; Malvern, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Western blotting analysis of MIV marker protein Alix
Protein lysate was prepared from MIVs and ADSCs using the protein extraction reagent (Applygen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The protein lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by being transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVD) membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membranes were blocked and then incubated with anti-Alix or β-actin antibody (1:500 dilution; Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h followed by enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Fisher).
MicroRNA microarray analysis of MIVs
Total RNA samples were prepared from the ADSCs (control group, n = 3) and the MIVs (experimental group, n = 3) using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The gene expression differences between groups were analyzed using DEG-seq. The standard default was set at fold change >2 or fold change <0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. Differentially expressed microRNAs (dif-microRNAs) were selected and then combined with the microRNA target gene prediction database miRbase, and TargetScan to predict the target gene(s) of the dif-microRNAs.
Gene ontology (GO) analysis and pathway analysis
GO analysis was used to analyze the main function of the differentially expressed genes. Generally, Fisher's exact tests were used to classify the GO category, and the FDR was calculated to correct the p-value. Enrichment provided a measure of the significance of the function, and the threshold of significance was defined as a p-value <0.01.
The pathway analysis identifies the pathways, in which the differentially expressed genes play roles. The pathways were annotated using KEGG pathway database. The Fisher's exact tests were used to identify significantly enriched pathways. The resulting p-values were adjusted using the BH FDR algorithm. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value <0.05.
RNA isolation, reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from ADSC-derived MIVs and ADSCs using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was quantified using a Nano drop spectrophotometer (ND-1000, Nanodrop Technologies), and subjected to reverse transcription using a reverse transcription kit (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) to synthesize complementary DNA (RT-PCR) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RT-PCR products were used for qPCR analysis: 3.6 μl RNase-free H2O, 0.2 μl forward primer (5 μM), 0.2 μl reverse primer (5 μM), 5.0 μl of 2× SYBR Green Supermix,; and RT-PCR cDNA, 1.0 μl. The qPCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 20 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s, and 70 °C for 1 s. All reactions were done in triplicate.
Cell wounding/migration assay
HUVEC cells were seeded in 6-well cell culture plates and allowed to reach 80% confluence, and then the monolayer culture was scratched using sterile 200 μl pipette tips. The culture medium was changed to remove any floating cells. The fresh culture medium was mixed with or without the MIVs. Microphotographs of wound closure were taken at 0 h and 24 h after cell wounding. The locations for microphotographs were marked on the plates. The % of gap remaining was also quantitatively calculated.
Boyden chamber transwell invasion assay
HUVECs were seeded onto the ECM-coated transwells of 24-well plates (Sigma Millipore), and cultured in EBM-2 + 0.25% BSA medium with or without ADSC-derived MIVs. After 24 h, the non-invading cells inside the transwells were gently removed with Q-tips, and the invading cells were fixed with pre-chilled 100% ethanol, and stained with propidium iodide. The numbers of invading HUVECs were then counted under a fluorescent microscope.
Uptake of the PKH26-labeled MIVs by HUVEC cells
MIVs were labeled with the PKH26 red fluorescent linker kit (Sigma, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The labeled MIVs were resuspended and incubated with HUVEC cells at 37 °C for 12 h. After 12 h the cells were washed twice with PBS twice, and then fixed with methanol for 20 min. The fixed cells were further stained with DAPI for 20sec. The stained cells were then subjected to confocal microscopy to determine the uptake of PKH26-labeled MIVs into HUVEC cells.
Results
Isolation and characterization of the MIVs derived from ADSC cells
The MIVs secreted from ADSC cells were obtained by centrifugation as described previously.26, 27, 28 Nanoparticle tracking analysis, SEM, and Western blotting analysis were performed to confirm the size and identity of the isolated MIVs. Briefly, a nanoparticle tracking analysis revealed that the MIV size distribution ranged from 100–300 nm particles (Fig. 1A), which were further confirmed by SEM imaging to show that nearly all particles were small vesicles (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the expression of the MIV proteins β-actin and Alix was confirmed by using Western blotting (Fig. 1C). Collectively, these data confirm that the isolated MIVs products exhibit the characteristics of MIVs.
Figure 1.
Identification and characterization of the ADSC-derived MIVs. (A) The size distribution of the MIVs isolated from ADSCs. (B) The morphology of the MIVs isolated from ADSCs, as determined by using an electron microscope. Representative images are shown. (C) Western blotting analysis of the presence of the MIV marker protein Alix (β-actin as a control) in MIVs isolated from ADSCs.
Microarray analysis of the ADSC-derived MIVs
The MIVs are closed vesicles and consist of molecules secreted by their originating cells, including proteins, mRNAs, and microRNAs, which together play an important role in the transfer of information between cells.29 To explore potential contents of the MIVs, we conducted microRNA microarray analysis by comparing the samples from ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs. Our results revealed that 32 microRNAs were expressed differentially between ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs (Table 1). Among them, nine were downregulated in ADSC-derived MIVs compared with ADSCs, whereas 23 were upregulated (fold change>2 or fold change <0.5; P-value <0.05; FDR <0.05) (Table 1). Thus, these results suggest that the release of MIVs from ADSCs may occur in a specific and organized manner, and that the bioactive molecules may be packaged into the MIVs selectively from ADSCs.
Table 1.
List of the microRNAs that are differentially expressed in ADSCs vs. ADSC-derived MIVs (n = 3 per group).
| microRNA | Expression in ADSC | Expression in MIV | Log2 FC | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hsa-miR-199a-3p | 22.6 | 1.98 | 3.51 | 0.00005 |
| Hsa-miR-4284 | 19.34 | 1.1 | 4.13 | 0.00006 |
| Hsa-let-7f-5p | 20.12 | 1.35 | 3.89 | 0.00006 |
| Hsa-let7i-5p | 26.41 | 3.9 | 2.76 | 0.00015 |
| Hsa-miR-125b-5p | 22.43 | 2.69 | 3.06 | 0.00097 |
| Hsa-miR-23a-3p | 18.33 | 1.76 | 3.38 | 0.00037 |
| Hsa-miR-19b-3p | 19.14 | 3.62 | 2.4 | 0.0035 |
| Hsa-miR-15b-5p | 18.32 | 3.74 | 2.3 | 0.00579 |
| Hsa-miR-20a-5p | 19.67 | 4.43 | 2.15 | 0.00657 |
| Hsa-miR-4466 | 0 | 20.02 | – | 0.00001 |
| Hsa-miR-5787 | 0 | 19.53 | – | 0.00001 |
| Hsa-miR-3656 | 1.5 | 20.07 | −3.74 | 0.00001 |
| Hsa-miR-6068 | 0 | 17.99 | – | 0.00001 |
| Hsa-miR-1246 | 1.96 | 19.74 | −3.33 | 0.00001 |
| Hsa-miR-2861 | 5.5 | 24.5 | −2.16 | 0.00002 |
| Hsa-miR-4687-3p | 4.24 | 21.48 | −2.33 | 0.00004 |
| Hsa-miR-6088 | 4.86 | 21.21 | −2.13 | 0.00009 |
| Hsa-miR-4787-5p | 2.88 | 16.9 | −2.56 | 0.00016 |
| Hsa-miR-1268a | 2.43 | 16 | −2.72 | 0.00016 |
| Hsa-miR-574-5p | 4.15 | 18.94 | −2.19 | 0.0002 |
| Hsa-miR-762 | 1.05 | 12.26 | −3.54 | 0.00028 |
| Hsa-miR-1225-5p | 3.6 | 15.71 | −2.12 | 0.00082 |
| Hsa-miR-1207-5p | 5.08 | 17.01 | −1.74 | 0.001656 |
| Hsa-miR-4763-3p | 2.73 | 12.79 | −2.22 | 0.002046 |
| Hsa-miR-638 | 10.92 | 24.58 | −1.17 | 0.002379 |
| Hsa-miR-1915-3p | 7.69 | 19.94 | −1.38 | 0.002757 |
| Hsa-miR-574-3p | 3.4 | 13.22 | −1.96 | 0.00325 |
| Hsa-miR-1234-5p | 10.75 | 23.66 | −1.14 | 0.00324 |
| Hsa-miR-6124 | 2.24 | 10.66 | −2.25 | 0.004623 |
| Hsa-miR-4443 | 9.97 | 21.2 | −1.09 | 0.006794 |
| Hsa-miR-4505 | 5.58 | 14.05 | −1.33 | 0.013636 |
| Hsa-miR-3934-5p | 6.24 | 14.67 | −1.23 | 0.015819 |
FC, fold change.
Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses of the target genes for the MIV-associated microRNAs
We selected the MIV-associated microRNAs (dif-microRNAs), and then used the microRNA target gene database miRbase to predict the potential target genes of the dif-microRNAs. The potential target genes were then selected to obtain the significant GO using GO analysis. The results were divided into three groups, biological process, cellular components and molecular function (data not shown). The biological processes included the positive regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter, nervous system development, the fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling pathway, hemophilic cell adhesion, cell migration, cell differentiation, and angiogenesis (P < 0.01). The cellular components contained neuronal cell bodies, dendrites, plasma membrane, tight junctions, and growth cones (P < 0.01). Kinase activity, protein binding, protein kinase activity, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 binding, transferase activity, and β-catenin binding (P < 0.01) were included in the molecular function group. These results suggest that ADSC-derived MIVs may regulate cell differentiation, cell migration, cell adhesion, the cell cycle, and angiogenesis through the bioactive molecules they contain.
Pathway analysis was used to identify the pathways modulated by the differentially expressed genes. The pathway annotations of the microarray genes were downloaded from KEGG; and Fisher's exact test was used to identify significantly enriched pathways. The microRNAs in ADSC-derived MIVs play roles in several different pathways, such as proteoglycans, cancer pathways, the MAPK signaling pathway, endocytosis, the Wnt signaling pathway, the VEGF signaling pathway, the Ras signaling pathway, and chronic myeloid leukemia (Fig. 2). It is conceivable that these pathways may play important roles in tumor development, angiogenesis, apoptosis, cell adhesion, and the transfer of information between cells.
Figure 2.
The KEGG pathway analysis of potential target genes of the differentially expressed microRNAs in MIVs.
Regulatory networks of MIV-associated microRNAs and their target genes
The relationships between the microRNAs and the genes they regulated were investigated by calculating their differential expression values according to the interactions between the microRNAs and genes in the Sanger microRNA database. The MicroRNA-target gene networks were then built, which connect 17 upregulated microRNAs and nine downregulated microRNAs and their potential target genes (Supplemental Figure 1). As an example, we highlighted a simple network formed by the up-regulated hsa-miR-1915-3p and its target genes (Fig. 3A), and an extended network formed by three down-regulated miRNAs, hsa-miR-23a-3p, hsa-let-7i-5p, and hsa-let-7f-5p and their target genes (Fig. 3B). Collectively, these microRNAs are linked to the dysregulation of transcription in cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, the VEGF signaling pathway, acute myeloid leukemia, the Wnt signaling pathway, adipocytokine signaling, the MAPK signaling pathway, and the Ras signaling pathway. They also play roles in a number of biological processes, including dilated cardiomyopathy, tumor development, angiogenesis, and cell adhesion.
Figure 3.
Representative networks of the microRNA up-regulated (A) and down-regulated (B) target gene pathways.
ADSC-derived MIVs promote cell migration of human endothelial cells
Two members (let-7i-5p and let-7f-5p) of the let-7 family, which have been shown to play an important role in angiogenesis, were identified in the microRNA-target gene network. To verify the results of the microarrays, we conducted qPCR analysis and found that the let-7i-5p was differentially expressed in ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs (Fig. 4A), which are consistent with the microarray results. Thus, these results confirm that the microRNAs present in the MIVs were derived from a cellular origin of ADSCs. To investigate the effects of ADSC-derived MIVs on HUVECs, we labeled ADSC-derived MIVs with PKH26 and then used them to treat HUVECs. Our results revealed that ADSC-derived MIV were located in the cytoplasm of HUVEC cells (Fig. 4B), suggesting that the ADSC-derived MIVs may be uptaken by HUVEC cells.
Figure 4.
MIVs can be uptaken by HUVECs. (A) the qPCR analysis of the expression of let-7i in ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs. *p < 0.05. (B) the MIVs were labeled with PKH26 (red), and then incubated with HUVECs. HUVEC nuclei were labeled with DAPI (blue), and examined under a fluorescence microscope. Representative images are shown.
The microarray analysis, GO analysis, and pathway analysis revealed that ADSC-derived MIVs may play a role in angiogenesis. We hypothesized that ADSC-derived MIVs may directly affect HUVECs. To test this hypothesis, we investigated whether ADSC-derived MIVs affected the migration of HUVECs. HUVECs treated with ADSC-derived MIVs exhibited enhanced migration compared with the control group (Fig. 5A panel a). Quantitative analysis indicates that approximately 31% of the wounded gap remained open in the no MIVs group, compared with <5% gap open in the +MIVs group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5A, panel b). Similarly, the Boyden chamber transwell invasion assay revealed that ADSC-derived MIVs significantly promoted the invasion capability of the HUVEC cells (Fig. 5B). Collectively, these results suggest that ADSC-derived MIVs may have potential to promote angiogenesis by enhancing both migration and invasion of HUVEC cells.
Figure 5.
ADSC-derived MIVs promote the cell migration of HUVECs. (A) The effect of MIVs on cell wound heading. Subconfluent HUVECs were scratched (0 h) and maintained with (+MIVs) or without MIVs (-MIVs). Wounding areas were photographed again in 24 h (a). Black squares represent the reference points. Representative images are shown. The % of gap remaining was quantitatively calculated and graphed (b). (B) Boyden Transwells invasion assay was carried out using HUVECs by incubating the cells with (+MIV) and without (-MIV) MIVs. Representative images are shown.
Discussion
The proangiogenic potential of ADSC-derived MIVs may be explored as therapeutic strategies for clinical conditions such as myocardial infarction (MI). MI is a serious form of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with myocardial ischemic necrosis, and is caused by a sharp reduction or interruption in coronary arterial blood due to thrombus formation in the intravascular tissues or persistent spasm in the coronary artery. Because the underlying pathology of MI is coronary artery lesion, the main treatment is coronary artery reperfusion.32 Only a limited number of patients can undergo CABG surgery, and up to 30% of patients do not have transplantable veins.6, 33 Novel treatments have been introduced in recent years, including cooling and stem cell transplantation.34, 35 The treatment of MI using stem cell transplantation involves the transplantation of stem cells into damaged cardiac muscle where they differentiate into cardiac muscle or endothelial cells or affect the microenvironment.36, 37, 38, 39 The repair of the myocardium is closely related to the blood supply,15 and successful treatment depends on either coronary recanalization or building a novel vascular access. Successful cases of treatment using stem cells are not rare. For example, patients with lymphatic leukemia and myeloid leukemia have been treated successfully using hematopoietic stem cells, those with Parkinson's disease and stroke have been treated with mesenchymal stem cells.40, 41 Additional studies have shown positive effects of stem cell treatment in MI, and follow-up data suggest that there are also considerable long-term effects.8, 9, 10 The use of stem cell therapy for MI might involve the promotion of angiogenesis.42
Stem cells can regenerate blood vessels after differentiating into endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells or by promoting angiogenesis in the areas surrounding the damaged myocardium via paracrine mechanisms.43, 44 Mallela et al investigated the effects of stem cells in angiogenesis and the role of natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPRA) in tumor development.45 Furthermore, Matsumura et al indicated a role for bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in angiogenesis by differentiating into endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells.46 Stem cells can promote angiogenesis via paracrine pathways by secreting VEGF, rich cysteine protein 61 (Cyr61), and other factors.47 However, there are several concerns over the use of stem cell-based therapies. The first problem is the selection and collection of stem cells. While bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are the most widely used adult stem cells, there are disadvantages associated with their use, including low recovery rate, high morbidity and adverse effects associated with harvest, and potential host immune response if allotransplantation is used. Furthermore, there are some issues associated with stem cell therapy, including the induction of differentiation and potential tumorigenesis.48 ADSCs have been shown to differentiate into endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells to promote angiogenesis.37, 38, 49, 50 Unlikely many other sources of mesenchymal cells, ADSCs are derived from adipose tissue with easy access and rich resources, and may replace bone marrow stem cell as the mainstay of stem cell transplantation.
ADSCs can also release MIVs, which vary in sizes with diameters ranging from 30–1000 nm. Many types of cells can secret MIVs, including ADSCs, tumor cells, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and HUVECs. MIVs contain numerous bioactive molecules, including proteins, mRNAs, and microRNAs, which are released from cells to play an important role in the transfer of information.51 Body fluids such as blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid can transport MIVs to target cells.52 Therefore, MIV may be used as disease diagnostic markers in body fluids.
Since MIVs are secreted by cells with the release of bioactive molecules selectively packaged by cells into MIVs, it is conceivable that MIVs may replace its origin cells to play biological functions of cells. It was shown that mesenchymal stem cell-derived MIVs could protect the heart by replacing mesenchymal stem cells in this cardiac protective function.53 Similar observations were reported regarding the role of tumor cell-derived MIVs in angiogenesis.54 MIV-based therapy has more advantages than stem cell therapy, as MIVs do not need to be induced and do not solicit host immune response. Furthermore, their smaller sizes mean that it is easier for MIVs to reach the target cells than stem cells.55
Although MIVs contains numerous types of bioactive molecules, one of the most important biomolecules that are released by MIVs is microRNAs, which are short non-coding RNAs (sized 20–25 nucleotides) that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level and hence modulate biological processes including the cell cycle, differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.56, 57 Since Lin-4 and let-7 were the first and second microRNAs discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans, respectively,58, 59 more than 2000 microRNAs have been identified in humans to date. It was reported that microRNAs may play an important role in angiogenesis by regulating signal pathways, HUVEC migration, and HUVEC proliferation and differentiation.60, 61
The let-7 microRNA family have 13 members in humans including let-7a-1, let-7a-2, let-7a-3, let-7b, let-7c, let-7d, let-7e, let-7f-1, let-7f-2, let-7g, let-7i, mir-98, and mir-202. Angiogenesis plays a critical role in the formation of blood vessels and the maintenance of homeostasis. HUVEC is the key regulator of vascular biology, including angiogenesis. Let-7 plays an important role in angiogenesis, and is expressed at high levels in HUVEC. Let-7 has been shown to play an important role in angiogenesis.62 However, the exact mechanism by which let-7 promotes angiogenesis is not fully understood. Several angiogenesis-related factors including platelet reaction protein, matrix metalloproteinnase-1, and VEGF-2 may be involved in let-7-mediated angiogenesis.63, 64, 65 The hypoxia-inducing factor 1α/let-7/Argonaut 1/VEGF signaling pathway may play a role in hypoxia-induced angiogenesis.66 It was reported that let-7i decreased in co-cultured glioma and brain capillary endothelial cells, as well as in co-cultured neural stem cells and endothelial cells.67, 68, 69 Nonetheless, the potential roles of let-7 in both tumor angiogenesis and brain angiogenesis via neural stem cells should be further investigated.68
In summary, we investigate the potential use of ADSC-derived MIVs as a replacement of stem cell therapy to promote angiogenesis. We characterized the MIV products using electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and Western blotting. We found that the MIV products had a size range of 100–300 nm, and expressed the protein Alix. We further analyzed the microRNAs in ADSCs and ADSC-derived MIVs using microRNA, GO, signaling pathway analysis, as well as microRNA-target-gene network analysis. Our results demonstrated that ADSC-derived MIVs selectively released microRNAs, and were rich in microRNAs related to angiogenesis, including two members of the let-7 family. To verify the role of ADSC-derived MIVs in angiogenesis, we analyzed the effect of ADSC-derived MIVs on HUVEC migration and invasion. Our results indicate that ADSC-derived MIVs can promote the migration and invasion abilities of endothelial cells. Furthermore, PKH26-labeled ADSC-derived MIVs were effectively uptaken into the cellular cytoplasm of HUVEC cells. Future studies should be directed to investigate the role and mechanism through which of ADSC-derived MIVs regulates angiogenesis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The reported work was supported in part by research grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province China (#20151BAB215005) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (#81660029, 81360083). TCH was also supported by the Mabel Green Myers Research Endowment Fund, USA and The University of Chicago Orthopaedics Alumni Fund, USA. Funding sources were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2019.04.005.
Contributor Information
Tong-Chuan He, Email: tche@uchicago.edu.
Xiaozhong Wang, Email: wangxiaozhong1973@126.com.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
figs1.
A comprehensive view of the microRNA and their target pathway network.
References
- 1.Raposo G., Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201211138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Maas S.L.N., Breakefield X.O., Weaver A.M. Extracellular vesicles: unique intercellular delivery vehicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27(3):172–188. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tkach M., Théry C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: where we are and where we need to go. Cell. 2016;164(6):1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hessvik N.P., Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(2):193–208. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2595-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cao C.F., Ren J.Y., Zhou X.H., Li S.F., Chen H. Twenty-year trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction in Beijing. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(22):4210–4215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Veith F.J., Moss C.M., Sprayregen S., Montefusco C. Preoperative saphenous venography in arterial reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity. Surgery. 1979;85(3):253–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang H., Eitzman D.T. Acute myocardial infarction leads to acceleration of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2013;229(1):18–22. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moran A., Gu D., Zhao D. Future cardiovascular disease in China: markov model and risk factor scenario projections from the coronary heart disease policy model-China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(3):243–252. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.910711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smith S.C., Jr., Zheng Z.J. The impending cardiovascular pandemic in China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(3):226–227. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Niccoli G., Rigattieri S., De Vita M.R. Open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside after thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the prevention of microvascular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction: the REOPEN-AMI study (Intracoronary nitroprusside versus adenosine in acute myocardial infarction) JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(6):580–589. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li S., Chen A., Mead K. Racial disparities in the use of cardiac revascularization: does local hospital capacity matter? PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Meyer G.P., Wollert K.C., Lotz J. Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: 5-year follow-up from the randomized-controlled BOOST trial. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(24):2978–2984. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yousef M., Schannwell C.M., Kostering M., Zeus T., Brehm M., Strauer B.E. The BALANCE Study: clinical benefit and long-term outcome after intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(24):2262–2269. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kang H.J., Kim M.K., Lee H.Y. Five-year results of intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cells by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(24):3062–3069. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee S.H., Wolf P.L., Escudero R., Deutsch R., Jamieson S.W., Thistlethwaite P.A. Early expression of angiogenesis factors in acute myocardial ischemia and infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(9):626–633. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003023420904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hua J., He Z.G., Qian D.H. Angiopoietin-1 gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells promote angiogenesis and reduce acute pancreatitis in rats. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(7):3580–3595. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bruno S., Collino F., Iavello A., Camussi G. Effects of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles on tumor growth. Front Immunol. 2014;5:382. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem and stromal cells for cell-based therapy: current status of preclinical studies and clinical trials. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2010;12(4):442–449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ruetze M., Richter W. Adipose-derived stromal cells for osteoarticular repair: trophic function versus stem cell activity. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2014;16:e9. doi: 10.1017/erm.2014.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Im W., Ban J., Lim J. Extracts of adipose derived stem cells slows progression in the R6/2 model of Huntington's disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hsiao S.T., Lokmic Z., Peshavariya H. Hypoxic conditioning enhances the angiogenic paracrine activity of human adipose-derived stem cells. Stem Cell Dev. 2013;22(10):1614–1623. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Matsuda K., Falkenberg K.J., Woods A.A., Choi Y.S., Morrison W.A., Dilley R.J. Adipose-derived stem cells promote angiogenesis and tissue formation for in vivo tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2013;19(11–12):1327–1335. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shoji T., Ii M., Mifune Y. Local transplantation of human multipotent adipose-derived stem cells accelerates fracture healing via enhanced osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Lab Invest. 2010;90(4):637–649. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Deveza L., Choi J., Imanbayev G., Yang F. Paracrine release from nonviral engineered adipose-derived stem cells promotes endothelial cell survival and migration in vitro. Stem Cell Dev. 2013;22(3):483–491. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Collino F., Deregibus M.C., Bruno S. Microvesicles derived from adult human bone marrow and tissue specific mesenchymal stem cells shuttle selected pattern of miRNAs. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kawamoto T., Ohga N., Akiyama K. Tumor-derived microvesicles induce proangiogenic phenotype in endothelial cells via endocytosis. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quesenberry P.J., Aliotta J.M. The paradoxical dynamism of marrow stem cells: considerations of stem cells, niches, and microvesicles. Stem Cell Rev. 2008;4(3):137–147. doi: 10.1007/s12015-008-9036-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Grange C., Tapparo M., Collino F. Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer Res. 2011;71(15):5346–5356. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu J.L., May L., Lhotak V. Oncogenic events regulate tissue factor expression in colorectal cancer cells: implications for tumor progression and angiogenesis. Blood. 2005;105(4):1734–1741. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kosaka N., Iguchi H., Yoshioka Y., Takeshita F., Matsuki Y., Ochiya T. Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(23):17442–17452. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.107821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hong B.S., Cho J.H., Kim H. Colorectal cancer cell-derived microvesicles are enriched in cell cycle-related mRNAs that promote proliferation of endothelial cells. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:556. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brodie B.R., Stuckey T.D., Wall T.C. Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32(5):1312–1319. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00395-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Seifalian A.M., Tiwari A., Hamilton G., Salacinski H.J. Improving the clinical patency of prosthetic vascular and coronary bypass grafts: the role of seeding and tissue engineering. Artif Organs. 2002;26(4):307–320. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schmidt M.R., Pryds K., Botker H.E. Novel adjunctive treatments of myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(6):434–443. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gotberg M., Olivecrona G.K., Koul S. A pilot study of rapid cooling by cold saline and endovascular cooling before reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(5):400–407. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Larijani B., Esfahani E.N., Amini P. Stem cell therapy in treatment of different diseases. Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(2):79–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fan W., Sun D., Liu J. Adipose stromal cells amplify angiogenic signaling via the VEGF/mTOR/Akt pathway in a murine hindlimb ischemia model: a 3D multimodality imaging study. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Valina C., Pinkernell K., Song Y.H. Intracoronary administration of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cells improves left ventricular function, perfusion, and remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(21):2667–2677. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moldovan N.I., Anghelina M., Varadharaj S. Reoxygenation-derived toxic reactive oxygen/nitrogen species modulate the contribution of bone marrow progenitor cells to remodeling after myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(1) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoon S.H., Shim Y.S., Park Y.H. Complete spinal cord injury treatment using autologous bone marrow cell transplantation and bone marrow stimulation with granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor: phase I/II clinical trial. Stem Cell. 2007;25(8):2066–2073. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Venkataramana N.K., Kumar S.K., Balaraju S. Open-labeled study of unilateral autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Transl Res. 2010;155(2):62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu J.-F., Wang B.-W., Hung H.-F., Chang H., Shyu K.-G. Human mesenchymal stem cells improve myocardial performance in a splenectomized rat model of chronic myocardial infarction. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107(2):165–174. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bajpai V.K., Andreadis S.T. Stem cell sources for vascular tissue engineering and regeneration. Tissue Eng B Rev. 2012;18(5):405–425. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dai W., Hale S.L., Martin B.J. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation. 2005;112(2):214–223. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.527937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mallela J., Ravi S., Jean Louis F. Natriuretic peptide receptor A signaling regulates stem cell recruitment and angiogenesis: a model to study linkage between inflammation and tumorigenesis. Stem Cell. 2013;31(7):1321–1329. doi: 10.1002/stem.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Matsumura G., Miyagawa-Tomita S., Shin'oka T., Ikada Y., Kurosawa H. First evidence that bone marrow cells contribute to the construction of tissue-engineered vascular autografts in vivo. Circulation. 2003;108(14):1729–1734. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000092165.32213.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dittmer J., Leyh B. Paracrine effects of stem cells in wound healing and cancer progression (Review) Int J Oncol. 2014;44(6):1789–1798. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Takahashi K., Okita K., Nakagawa M., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblast cultures. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(12):3081–3089. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Harris L.J., Abdollahi H., Zhang P., McIlhenny S., Tulenko T.N., DiMuzio P.J. Differentiation of adult stem cells into smooth muscle for vascular tissue engineering. J Surg Res. 2011;168(2):306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heydarkhan-Hagvall S., Schenke-Layland K., Yang J.Q. Human adipose stem cells: a potential cell source for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Cells Tissues Organs. 2008;187(4):263–274. doi: 10.1159/000113407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sabin K., Kikyo N. Microvesicles as mediators of tissue regeneration. Transl Res. 2014;163(4):286–295. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sun Q., Chen X., Yu J., Zen K., Zhang C.Y., Li L. Immune modulatory function of abundant immune-related microRNAs in microvesicles from bovine colostrum. Protein Cell. 2013;4(3):197–210. doi: 10.1007/s13238-013-2119-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu B., Gong M., Wang Y. Cardiomyocyte protection by GATA-4 gene engineered mesenchymal stem cells is partially mediated by translocation of miR-221 in microvesicles. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e73304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Turturici G., Tinnirello R., Sconzo G., Geraci F. Extracellular membrane vesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication: advantages and disadvantages. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014;306(7):C621–C633. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00228.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Biancone L., Bruno S., Deregibus M.C., Tetta C., Camussi G. Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(8):3037–3042. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wienholds E., Plasterk R.H. MicroRNA function in animal development. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(26):5911–5922. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee R.C., Feinbaum R.L., Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75(5):843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Reinhart B.J., Slack F.J., Basson M. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2000;403(6772):901–906. doi: 10.1038/35002607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Suarez Y., Sessa W.C. MicroRNAs as novel regulators of angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2009;104(4):442–454. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.191270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kuehbacher A., Urbich C., Dimmeler S. Targeting microRNA expression to regulate angiogenesis. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008;29(1):12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kuehbacher A., Urbich C., Zeiher A.M., Dimmeler S. Role of Dicer and Drosha for endothelial microRNA expression and angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2007;101(1):59–68. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.153916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bae O.N., Wang J.M., Baek S.H., Wang Q., Yuan H., Chen A.F. Oxidative stress-mediated thrombospondin-2 upregulation impairs bone marrow-derived angiogenic cell function in diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(8):1920–1927. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Otsuka M., Zheng M., Hayashi M. Impaired microRNA processing causes corpus luteum insufficiency and infertility in mice. J Clin Investig. 2008;118(5):1944–1954. doi: 10.1172/JCI33680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Suarez Y., Fernandez-Hernando C., Pober J.S., Sessa W.C. Dicer dependent microRNAs regulate gene expression and functions in human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2007;100(8):1164–1173. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265065.26744.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen Z., Lai T.C., Jan Y.H. Hypoxia-responsive miRNAs target argonaute 1 to promote angiogenesis. J Clin Investig. 2013;123(3):1057–1067. doi: 10.1172/JCI65344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Roitbak T., Li L., Cunningham L.A. Neural stem/progenitor cells promote endothelial cell morphogenesis and protect endothelial cells against ischemia via HIF-1alpha-regulated VEGF signaling. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(9):1530–1542. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Roitbak T., Bragina O., Padilla J.L., Pickett G.G. The role of microRNAs in neural stem cell-supported endothelial morphogenesis. Vasc Cell. 2011;3:25. doi: 10.1186/2045-824X-3-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wurdinger T., Tannous B.A., Saydam O. miR-296 regulates growth factor receptor overexpression in angiogenic endothelial cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(5):382–393. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






