Abstract
Background: Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is one of the cancers with the highest mortality rate and prevalence worldwide; however, the clinical management of the disease remains challenging. Metabolomics has emerged as a powerful tool with beneficial applications in cancer biology and thus can provide new insights on the underlying mechanisms of UBC progression and/or reveal novel diagnostic and therapeutic schemes. Methods: A collection of four human UBC cell lines that critically reflect the different malignancy grades of UBC was employed; RT4 (grade I), RT112 (grade II), T24 (grade III), and TCCSUP (grade IV). They were examined using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Mass Spectrometry, and advanced statistical approaches, with the goal of creating new metabolic profiles that are mechanistically associated with UBC progression toward metastasis. Results: Distinct metabolic profiles were observed for each cell line group, with T24 (grade III) cells exhibiting the most abundant metabolite contents. AMP and creatine phosphate were highly increased in the T24 cell line compared to the RT4 (grade I) cell line, indicating the major energetic transformation to which UBC cells are being subjected during metastasis. Thymosin β4 and β10 were also profiled with grade-specific patterns of expression, strongly suggesting the importance of actin-cytoskeleton dynamics for UBC advancement to metastatic and drug-tolerant forms. Conclusions: The present study unveils a novel and putatively druggable metabolic signature that holds strong promise for early diagnosis and the successful chemotherapy of UBC disease.
Keywords: biomarker, bladder, cancer, grade, metabolomics, MS, NMR
1. Introduction
Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) exhibits the highest mortality rate worldwide, being categorized as the second most common genitourinary disease in the USA [1]. UBC still remains a major clinical challenge and its treatment mainly depends on early diagnosis [2]. It can be generally classified as a low-grade (I and II) non-muscle-invasive and a high-grade (III and IV) muscle-invasive disease that is prone to metastasis, based on histological differentiations from normal bladder cells [3]. One third of non-muscle-invasive UBCs progress to high(er) grades or stages of malignancy [4], which, along with the symptom-to-treatment delay for affected patients [5], compromise the therapeutic effectiveness and success of clinically applied regimens. UBC is characterized by high recurrence rates, with the continuous monitoring of patients being a medical practice of great importance [6]. Notably, despite their initial chemosensitivity, UBC patients will eventually develop chemoresistance due to tumors’ mutational heterogeneity, leading to a median survival expectancy of 13–19 months [7,8]. Thereby, novel, early diagnosis, and druggable biomarkers for UBC need to be promptly discovered.
Metabolomics, according to Professor J. Nicolson’s definition, is “the quantitative measurement of the dynamic and multi-parametric metabolic response of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli or genetic modifications” [9], with its great potential and promise in cancer research being continuously proved. The reprogramming of cellular metabolism seems to act as a strong force in tumorigenesis [10]. Malignant hallmarks, such as cell survival under stress conditions, as well as tumors’ ability to utilize nutrients and successfully encounter high-energy demands, are tightly correlated with metabolic alterations, thus indicating the major roles of metabolic landscapes in Cancer Biology [11,12,13,14]. Metabolic activities may significantly differ among distinct subtypes or malignancy grades/stages of the same type of cancer, leading to different metabolic networks and metabolomes [15,16]. Metabolomics has gained great value, power, and importance for cancer research, not only as a multifaceted tool in early diagnosis, but also as a valuable platform for the discovery of novel mechanisms controlling tumorigenesis, thus paving the way to new treatment strategies and therapies. Research on several cancers has significantly profited from the engagement of metabolomics technology. However, its application to early detection, progression, and the chemotherapeutic management of human malignancies and especially UBC remains still limited, and it needs to be further expanded [15,16,17,18,19,20].
Most metabolomics studies in UBC cell lines have focused on differentiating between normal bladder and UBC cells, and they have shown the importance of several metabolites involved in pathways related to energy production, such as fatty acids, amino acids, and organic acids. [21,22]. The effect of the oncometabolome on progression of the disease has recently emerged as a new field in UBC research [23,24,25,26]. Few studies used two cell lines, for low and high-grade UBC, in order to find distinct metabolic profiles between the two grades [27,28]. They observed that pyruvate consumption, as well as alanine and lactate levels, might be related to UBC aggressiveness, and they also suggested the role of fatty acid biosynthesis and amino acid metabolism in disease progression.
To further expand these studies, we herein engaged a collection of four human UBC cell lines that critically reflect the distinct de-differentiation stage, malignancy grade (I, II, III, and IV), mutational signature, genetic heterogeneity, metastatic capacity, and chemotherapeutic tolerance of UBC to thoroughly investigate the metabolic alterations to which UBC cells are being subjected during disease progression. Our findings are expected to shed light into mechanisms regulating the transition of normal to the oncogenic and, finally, metastatic cell phase. Employment of the two state-of-the-art analytical platforms, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mass Spectrometry (MS), which are complementary, allows the more comprehensive metabolic profiling of UBC, with the grade-specific metabolic signatures revealed essentially contributing to the significant advancement in the success, efficacy, and safety of conducted research. High-scale UBC cell culturing enabled the high-resolution metabolic landscaping, while the high density of cells upon harvesting portrayed tumor architectural organization in vivo.
2. Results
In this study, a comparative NMR and LC-MS-mediated metabolic profiling was performed in four UBC human cell lines in order to thoroughly examine the effects of oncometabolome composition on progression of the disease.
2.1. NMR Analysis
The 1H 1D NMR spectra of the four UBC cell lines with the respective standard deviations obtained from each group are shown in Figure 1. The observed within-group variability has proved to be very low, thus confirming the precision and high-technical value of the procedure being followed for sample preparation and the subsequent instrumental analysis. In total, 42 metabolites have been identified (Supplementary Table S1), with the annotated and grade-dependent metabolites being described in Figure 2 as boxplot-type graphs.
For the multivariate analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was first conducted to search for outliers and trends of discrimination. Νo outliers were detected (Hotteling eclipse, 95% confidence level), and a clear separation of the four UBC groups was observed (Supplementary Figure S1). Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) confirmed the clear separation of the examined groups, with good quality parameters and prediction power [R2X(cum) = 0.982 and Q2(cum) = 0.977]. Orthogonal Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) pairwise comparisons were also performed to search for discriminatory variables for each grade-specific UBC cell line. The S-plot between grade I (RT4) and grade III (T24) UBC cells revealed that the T24 cell line exhibits notably upregulated levels of most metabolites, including, among others, amino acids (glutamate, alanine, threonine), organic acids (acetate, lactate), myo-inositol, creatine, and choline phosphate, while decreased contents of few metabolites (uracil, histidine, and propylene glycol) were observed (Figure 3A). The S-plot between grade III (T24) and grade IV (TCCSUP) UBC cells unveiled that the grade IV-specific levels of most metabolites were significantly reduced and restored almost to the grade I (RT4) respective levels, indicating a “metabolic inversion” effect during the advanced (late stage) UBC development (Figure 3B). This is observed in the PLS-DA scores plot of UBC groups, with RT4 and TCCSUP showing an inability to be discriminated on the first PC, while grade III (T24) was being proved as the most distant UBC group on the same component (Figure 3C). Validation of the PLS-DA model using permutation testing is shown in Figure 3D. Table 1 summarizes the results of univariate analysis of the identified metabolites, considering grade I (RT4) as the UBC cell line of reference (control) in order to explore malignancy grade-specific metabolic changes occurring during disease progression. Grade-dependent metabolites were detected and shown to be implicated in diverse metabolic pathways, such as amino acid metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and energy metabolism, as well as purine and pyrimidine metabolism. In accordance to the multivariate analysis, elevated contents of most metabolites are observed in grade III (T24), whereas they are restored (reduced) to their respective levels of the reference grade I group (RT4) [Fold Change (x) close to 1], or even lower, in the grade IV (TCCSUP) cells. Since the majority of metabolites (40 out of 42) exhibited significant increase in the grade III (T24) group, further investigation was performed in order to take into account dilution effects and metabolic dependencies. For the identified metabolites, all pairwise ratios were examined, and the fold change (x) of each metabolic trait was calculated. A heat map of the fold change (x) values of metabolic ratios between grade III (T24) and grade I (RT4) UBC cell groups is presented in Supplementary Figure S2. Among the 42 metabolites that were found to be significant, the pairwise ratios analysis highlighted the importance of a sub-collection containing 14 of them. Remarkably, uracil, hypoxanthine, adenine, tryptophan, propylene glycol, formate, UDPs, and choline ratios exhibited the highest decrease in grade III (T24) compared to grade I (RT4), whereas ADP, AMP, GTP, oxypurinol, creatine phosphate, and myo-inositol ratios showed the most significant increase in grade III (T24) [compared to grade I (RT4) reference group] cells. Importantly, the reduced metabolite contents, except for the uracil and propylene glycol ones, were found to be elevated in the analysis of metabolite concentrations only (expressed as signals). On the contrary, most of these metabolite ratios were shown to be decreased, which suggests that the analysis of metabolite concentrations only may lead to erroneous results when such enormous biological differences between compared groups are observed.
Table 1.
Metabolites | Gr II/Gr I | Gr III/Gr I | Gr IV/Gr I |
---|---|---|---|
Alanine | 1.66 | 6.99 | 0.81 |
Aspartate | 1.18 | 3.33 | 0.78 |
Glutamate | 1.41 | 6.44 | 0.88 |
Glutathione | 1.65 | 7.18 | 0.87 |
Glycine | 1.33 | 5.71 | 0.32 |
Histidine | 1.41 | 2.91 | 0.74 |
Isoleucine | 1.96 | 5.62 | 0.86 |
Leucine | 1.61 | 3.51 | 0.77 |
N-Acetylglutamine | 1.14 | 10.17 | 0.99 |
Phenylalanine | 1.82 | 5.92 | 0.86 |
Proline | 1.5 | 4.77 | 0.75 |
Taurine | 1.55 | 5.5 | 0.67 |
Threonine | 1.42 | 5.38 | 0.74 |
Tryptophan | 1.01 | 1.6 | 0.37 |
Tyrosine | 1.77 | 6.25 | 0.88 |
Valine | 1.79 | 4.81 | 0.74 |
β-Alanine | 1.68 | 4.54 | 0.82 |
Acetate | 1.56 | 4.17 | 2.78 |
Formate | 1.13 | 1.28 | 0.68 |
Fumarate | 1.65 | 3.34 | 0.92 |
Lactate | 1.39 | 3.22 | 0.39 |
Malate | 1.95 | 6.5 | 1.12 |
Succinate | 1.79 | 4.65 | 0.51 |
Adenine | 0.68 | 1.33 | 0.12 |
ADP | 1.76 | 20.76 | 1.49 |
AMP | 1.45 | 34.33 | 0.79 |
ATP | 1.6 | 6.1 | 0.88 |
GTP | 1.29 | 11.31 | 0.88 |
Hypoxanthine | 2.41 | 1.81 | 0.24 |
NAD+ | 2.86 | 3.76 | 0.86 |
NADH | 1.36 | 4.62 | 0.83 |
Oxypurinol | 1.46 | 10.16 | 0.45 |
Uracil | 1.36 | 0.72 | 0.23 |
UDPs | 1.71 | 2.66 | 0.83 |
UDP-GlcNAc | 2.43 | 3.25 | 0.75 |
UMP | 1.82 | 7.77 | 0.82 |
Choline | 2.96 | 2.44 | 0.19 |
Choline phosphate | 1.27 | 6.26 | 0.37 |
Creatine | 1.35 | 5.73 | 0.45 |
Creatine phosphate | 1.51 | 22.99 | 0.66 |
Myo-inositol | 2.89 | 12.06 | 0.37 |
Propylene glycol | 1.34 | 0.38 | 0.29 |
In order to systemically map and integrate the metabolic hits into their related biological pathways, the statistically significant metabolites were imported into CytoScape 3.7.0, using MetScape for metabolomics data visualization. Extracted pathway and metabolic course analyses are illustrated in Figure 4A. Among others, it seems that purine and pyrimidine metabolism (including the one of uracil) can critically control (positively or negatively) UBC progression to late-malignancy stages (Figure 4B). Importantly, propylene glycol (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG): 1, 2 propanediol), which is implicated in lactaldehyde metabolism, as shown in the constructed network (Figure 4A), may also be notably downregulated during UBC advancement toward metastasis (e.g., T24; grade III). Figure 4C describes the enzymatic reaction of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B (AKR1B1), which is the enzyme that catalyzes the NADP-dependent conversion of propylene glycol to lactaldehyde in human (KEGG Reaction R02577, EC 1.1.1.21).
2.2. MS Analysis
Representative LC-MS chromatograms of each one of the four UBC cell lines are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. PCA scores plots, before and after filtering of the features based on the % Relative Standard Deviation in Quality Control samples (QCs) and QC-based Signal-correction Method (QC-RLSC) correction (Supplementary Figure S4A,B, respectively), for instrument drift and signal attenuation, remarkably lead to more consistent clustering of QCs after normalization, therefore improving the repeatability and accuracy of the study.
In order to more deeply investigate for grade-specific variables among the four UBC cell groups that are able to uniquely reflect urothelial bladder-tumor pathologies (e.g., grade, stage, metastatic capacity, mutational load, and genetic heterogeneity), different multivariate approaches were employed, including the PLS-DA (SIMCA-P), KODAMA (R package), and Breiman’s Random-Forest (BR-F) (StatTarget) tools. The results obtained from multivariate analyses were evaluated based on their multi-ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) values (calculated for every MS feature) and are summarized in Table 2, wherein the features with an Area Under Curve (AUC) > 0.9 and their respective ranking after employing the different methodologies are shown. Loadings and Kruskal–Wallis ranking are the different platforms used by the Knowledge Discovery by Accuracy Maximization Analysis (KODAMA) algorithm for variable selection. The results described in Table 2 strongly suggest that KODAMA loadings and BF-R classification exhibit better performance for the four-group UBC-member comparisons than the classical PLS-DA model. Figure 5 presents the scores plot constructed using the three models. It is observed that the obtained results are in accordance with the ones derived from NMR analysis, with the grade III (T24) UBC cell group showing the highest separation on the first principal component in all three methods used. Detailed results for testing each variable’s importance using the different methodologies KODAMA, PLS-DA, and multi-ROC AUC are shown in Supplementary Table S2, while the first 50 ranked variables using BF-R are summarized in Supplementary Table S3.
Table 2.
Feature | Multi-ROC AUC | Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) (PLS-DA) | Loadings Ranking | Kruskal Ranking | Random Forest (RF) (p-Value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
993.7033_3.7 | 0.995 | 56 | 11 | 54 | 2 |
828.2532_3.71 | 0.982 | 77 | 6 | 58 | 5 |
129.1015_3.71 | 0.98 | 79 | 4 | 61 | 2 |
993.3025_3.7 | 0.973 | 66 | 5 | 53 | 6 |
348.7831_0.69 | 0.972 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
993.5029_3.7 | 0.972 | 58 | 13 | 66 | 11 |
828.0866_3.71 | 0.96 | 69 | 9 | 57 | 20 |
136.0611_3.3 | 0.955 | 1 | 66 | 11 | 8 |
827.9193_3.71 | 0.952 | 71 | 14 | 65 | 12 |
828.4207_3.71 | 0.95 | 74 | 7 | 33 | 9 |
696.5591_0.69 | 0.942 | 49 | 52 | 17 | 41 |
823.9269_3.79 | 0.938 | 55 | 12 | 24 | 16 |
824.0938_3.8 | 0.938 | 52 | 32 | 70 | 13 |
120.08_2.03 | 0.935 | 99 | 57 | 4 | 15 |
823.4258_3.79 | 0.932 | 51 | 2 | 3 | 16 |
823.5929_3.8 | 0.932 | 41 | 15 | 31 | 5 |
823.7596_3.8 | 0.928 | 53 | 23 | 25 | 18 |
380.7729_0.69 | 0.925 | 86 | 49 | 28 | 38 |
118.0643_2.01 | 0.922 | 39 | 37 | 16 | 28 |
988.1106_3.8 | 0.917 | 54 | 20 | 12 | 1 |
828.7551_3.7 | 0.913 | 67 | 10 | 69 | 18 |
622.646_0.68 | 0.912 | 65 | 16 | 8 | 34 |
350.7812_0.69 | 0.91 | 47 | 26 | 20 | 31 |
212.8509_0.69 | 0.908 | 19 | 38 | 36 | 30 |
828.5893_3.79 | 0.908 | 112 | 30 | 55 | 14 |
988.7121_3.78 | 0.907 | 62 | 17 | 47 | 26 |
330.7728_0.66 | 0.902 | 36 | 33 | 13 | 45 |
486.713_0.66 | 0.902 | 34 | 28 | 6 | >50 |
827.7527_3.7 | 0.9 | 84 | 21 | 79 | 22 |
Among the top ranked variables, peaks corresponding to two peptides have been herein identified, after deconvolution of multiple charged peaks and isotope clusters. Accordingly, for the first peptide, penta- (m/z 993.5027), exa- (m/z 828.0855), and epta- (m/z 709.9307) charged ions of N-Acetyl Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) were recognized, while the monoisotopic mass M + H = 4961.4792 was also obtained after deconvolution of the Electro-Spray Ionization (ESI) spectra. For the second peptide, Thymosin β10 (Tβ10), penta- (m/z 988.2166), exa- (m/z 823.5936), and epta- (m/z 705.7941) charged ions were identified, with the deconvoluted mass of 4934.5153 corresponding again to the N-Acetyl form of Tβ10 peptide. The previous identification of thymosin-type peptides [29] has revealed that the fragmentation of Tβ4 generates mainly fragments of the b series, while that of Tβ10 generates mainly fragments of the y series. The respective ions were searched in the MS/MS spectra of the penta- and exa-charged ions, using the peptide-fragmentation tool of mMass after noise filtering. The matched ions for Tβ4 and Tβ10 are described in Table 3.
Table 3.
Ions of b Series, (Acetylated) Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) | |||||
m/z | Ion | z | Sequence | Error (Da) | Deconvoluted Mass |
774.9006 | b13 | 2 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFD.k [1xAcetyl] | 0.053 | 1547.696 |
946.616 | b16 | 2 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSK.l [1xAcetyl] | 0.157 | 1890.9178 |
1067.2304 | b18 | 2 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLK.k [1xAcetyl] | 0.182 | 2132.097 |
831.2934 | b21 | 3 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTE.t [1xAcetyl] | 0.197 | 2490.2895 |
355.2822 | b27 | 9 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNP.l [1xAcetyl] | 0.096 | 3187.6722 |
850.3742 | b29 | 4 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLP.s [1xAcetyl] | −0.069 | 3397.7732 |
936.3339 | b32 | 4 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKE.t [1xAcetyl] | −0.152 | 3741.9428 |
869.5772 | b37 | 5 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQE.k [1xAcetyl] | 0.132 | 4342.2255 |
1086.6825 | b37 | 4 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQE.k [1xAcetyl] | 0.128 | 4342.218 |
1164.2402 | b40-NH3 | 4 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQEKQA.g [1xAcetyl] | 0.145 | 4669.4134 |
788.6117 | b41 | 6 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQEKQAG.e [1xAcetyl] | −0.129 | 4726.4448 |
1182.801 | b41 | 4 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQEKQAG.e [1xAcetyl] | 0.194 | 4726.4304 |
971.9887 | b42 | 5 | .SDKPDMAEIEKFDKSKLKKTETQEKNPLPSKETIEQEKQAGE.s [1xAcetyl] | −0.107 | 4855.48 |
Ions of y Series, (Acetylated) Thymosin β10 (Tβ10) | |||||
m/z | Ion | z | Sequence | Error (Da) | Deconvoluted Mass |
839.5505 | y14 | 2 | p.TKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1142 | 1676.8726 |
592.5017 | y15 | 3 | l.PTKETIEwebQEKRSEIS. | 0.1909 | 1773.9327 |
1775.0578 | y15 | 1 | l.PTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1397 | 1790.9491 |
944.3809 | y16 | 2 | t.LPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.1239 | 1887.0094 |
663.8185 | y17 | 3 | n.TLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1304 | 1988.0643 |
994.9422 | y17 | 2 | n.TLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.0864 | 1988.0572 |
1052.2492 | y18 | 2 | k.NTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1992 | 2119.131 |
1244.6476 | y21 | 2 | t.QEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.0005 | 2504.3272 |
863.8784 | y22 | 3 | e.TQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.0947 | 2605.3821 |
1295.2735 | y22 | 2 | e.TQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1016 | 2605.3748 |
983.2832 | y25 | 3 | k.KTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1044 | 2946.5364 |
1130.0686 | y29 | 3 | k.AKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1194 | 3403.8786 |
1172.5977 | y30 | 3 | d.KAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.0498 | 3531.9735 |
630.6308 | y32 | 6 | s.FDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1209 | 3777.0594 |
756.3638 | y32 | 5 | s.FDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.0466 | 3777.0525 |
945.1581 | y32 | 4 | s.FDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.1031 | 3777.0452 |
810.8174 | y35 | 5 | e.IASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1763 | 4048.2055 |
807.212 | y35-NH3 | 5 | e.IASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.0238 | 4048.21 |
1059.3714 | y37 | 4 | m.GEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.1943 | 4251.2934 |
744.6523 | y39-H2O | 6 | p.DMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.07 | 4480.3443 |
1116.7269 | y39-H2O | 4 | p.DMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1471 | 4479.3502 |
916.6534 | y40 | 5 | k.PDMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1754 | 4594.421 |
965.1255 | y42 | 5 | a.DKPDMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.0231 | 4837.5425 |
1206.0731 | y42 | 4 | a.DKPDMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | −0.053 | 4837.5354 |
801.7036 | y42-NH3 | 6 | a.DKPDMGEIASFDKAKLKKTETQEKNTLPTKETIEQEKRSEIS. | 0.1215 | 4820.5236 |
Pairwise comparisons, using OPLS-DA models and univariate analysis, have also been performed. Hence, T24 (grade III) were compared to RT4 (grade I) that serve as reference cells. Figure 6 presents the pairwise comparison between the lower (I) and higher (III) UBC grade, using both multivariate and univariate approaches.
OPLS-DA analysis of these two UBC cell lines (RT4 and T24) was carried out to unveil important variables for their grade-specific and metabolic signature-dependent discrimination. In the OPLS-DA derived S-plot, features with the highest variation and reliability were selected. Tβ4 and Tβ10 were found to be strikingly elevated in the grade III (T24) UBC cell group. In the univariate analysis of the grade I (RT4) versus grade III (T24) UBC group, comparably similar results were obtained. Tβ10 peaks exhibit a log2 (FC) < −5, indicating a ca. 40-fold (x) increase in the grade III (T24) UBC cell group, while Tβ4 shows a log2 (FC) = −3, corresponding to a ca. 10-fold (x) increase for T24 cells, again.
3. Discussion
Cancer research has considerably benefited from cultured-cell metabolomics, which offers a number of advantages, such as minor ethical issues, cost-efficiency merit, and low biological variation, as compared to human biofluids [30,31]. In vitro metabolomics approaches facilitate the more integrated, systemic, and reliable experimental design, and, most importantly, the successful investigation of metabolic alterations that are directly and/or mechanistically linked to the tumorigenic process, and these may not be captured by blood and/or urine classical biochemical examination. However, there are still some challenges to cope with, such as the fast quenching of metabolism and data normalization [32,33]. To successfully encounter these challenges, we have chosen a grade-specific unique collection of UBC human cell lines that are able to largely maintain and thus mimic the pathology of the disease, including both its clinical features and molecular subtypes. Immediate freezing of UBC cultured cells ensured metabolism’s fast quenching equally for all the four cell lines examined, with RT4 (grade I) serving as the line of reference (control), due to its lowest malignancy grade among all. Data statistical processing, via the engagement of advanced algorithmic platforms, unearthed the major biological importance of our results to UBC progression toward tissue metastasis and refractory responses to chemotherapies.
To our knowledge, this is the first time all major UBC malignancy-grade cell types, I, II, III, and IV, with different mutational loads and metastatic proficiencies, are being metabolically fingerprinted, combining both NMR and LC-MS state-of-the-art technologies. Powerful and multifaceted statistical processing of the metabolic data ensures their biological validity and highlights the role of metabolomics pathways in UBC progression toward metastasis in vivo. Remarkably, each grade-specific UBC cell line has proved to carry its own unique metabolic signature that diagnostically, mechanistically, and therapeutically typifies each distinct tumorigenic phenotype examined. The question is whether the grade-dependent metabolome governs UBC pathology and aggressiveness, or, vice versa, the advancement to metastatic state(s) compels the acquisition of metabolic aberrations and the generation of derailed UBC metabolomes. It must be the grade-specific molecular signature of each UBC cell type that defines its unique metabolic landscape. However, the four cell lines herein examined carry different mutational profiles, with some mutations being likely unrelated (due to their generation stochasticity) to UBC aggressiveness. Hence, the possibility that these (non-causative for tumor features) mutations could be linked to some of the observed metabolic alterations cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the major mutation contents of the cell lines used are indeed grade dependent, and they can be classified according to the UBC grade, metastatic capacity, and general disease pathology. In any case, the high grade-specific oncometabolomes (e.g., of T24) seem to contain a number of critical metabolites that can serve as novel and powerful biomarkers for both the diagnosis and drug-mediated clinical management of UBC disease.
In this study, a four-cell-line group of a human UBC model has been in vitro engaged to thoroughly investigate the metabolic alterations that tumor cells likely undergo during UBC advancement, thus highlighting the importance of a malignancy grade, mutational signature, de-differentiation state and metastatic activity to “diagnostic biomarkering” and “targeted therapeutic drugging” of the disease. The four human UBC cell lines that have been analyzed critically reflect the distinct de-differentiation state and malignancy grade (I–IV) of UBC in vivo. Our results clearly indicate that T24 (grade III) can serve as a powerful, informative, and versatile cell-line system that can be successfully exploited to illuminate the role of metabolic reprogramming in UBC progression toward metastasis. It seems that the elevated contents of most metabolites specifically identified in T24 are tightly associated with the highly oncogenic character of the cells. Notably, PCA analysis showed that the grade III-specific T24-cell group exhibits the clearest separation on the first principal component, both in NMR and MS analysis, thus explaining the maximal amount of variation for its discrimination among the four cell groups. These results are strongly supported by biological data interpretations, since T24 cells bear a heavy mutational load and strong tumorigenic capacity. They are characterized by the mutant, oncogenic, form H-RASG12V and the disruption of stress-induced activation of mutant p53 (ΔΥ126) protein [34]. Hence, the aberrant signaling activity of H-RASG12V, in a cellular environment that lacks the genome-protecting properties of p53, may render T24 cells susceptible to severe metabolic reprogramming, with grade III-specific metabolites fostering and promoting highly tumorigenic features and pathologies, including genetic instability, clonal heterogeneity, chemoresistance, immune escape, and organ metastasis (tissue invasion). Interestingly, a role of H-RASG12V oncogene (RAS) in metabolic reprogramming during early mammary carcinogenesis has been previously reported, with the MCF10A-RAS transfected human breast epithelial cells exhibiting enhanced glycolytic activity and lactate production [35], consistently with the cancer hallmark of the classic “Warburg effect” [36,37]. Comparative genomics evidence that indicates that the T24 cell line (https://depmap.org/portal/cell_line/ACH-000018?tab=mutation) reliably reflects the mutational profile of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients (https://www.cbioportal.org; Bladder Cancer, TCGA Cell 2017, 413 Total Samples) supports and increases the utilization of T24 as a valid, pre-clinical, cell-model system for advanced bladder cancer research in diagnosis and therapy. Remarkably, besides the H-RAS and TP53 (encodes p53) mutated oncogenes, T24 cells share with muscle-invasive UBC patients multiple genes carrying molecular alterations, including (among others) the KDM6A, MAGEF1, DIDO1, and EP300 ones, with 37%, 31%, 30% and 30% of detection frequency, respectively, in the UBC patient cohort studied (Supplementary Table S4).
Among all UBC–cell pairs, embracing different grades being compared [e.g., II versus I, III versus I, and IV versus I; I (RT4) herein serves as the cell line of reference], only the grade III (T24) versus grade I (RT4) proved to significantly differ in the majority of metabolite contents examined, thus indicating the major role of the T24-specific mutational signature (including H-RASG12V and p53ΔY126) in metabolome composition and its oncogenic proficiency. The surprising resemblance between grade I (RT4) and grade IV (TCCSUP) metabolic profiles strongly suggests the engagement of a “metabolic inversion” process that likely favors late-metastasis cells to successfully encounter energetic challenges, nutritional demands, and oxygen deprivations. It is possible that a pre-metastatic UBC cell, after it becomes metastatic and invades other (proximal or/and distal) tissues/organs, will undergo a dramatic metabolic reprogramming to suppress its ability for a second metastasis event. If so, it may always be the primary tumor mass that feeds metastasis, with a metastatic-cell clonal population likely colonizing tissues outside the urinary bladder only once. In accordance, cell dissemination seems to occur during the early stages of tumor evolution, with cells from early and low-density lesions displaying more “stemness” features, migrating more and founding more metastases than cells derived from dense and advanced tumors [38,39,40].
The majority of previous UBC metabolomics reports have underlined the importance of amino acids to urothelium oncometabolome, with most amino acid levels being upregulated compared to controls; similar differential patterns were described for advanced UBC stage(s) compared to early stage(s). Interestingly, increased contents of glutathione were found in UBC cell lines, while glycine was elevated in the tumorigenic cells as well [21,22]. Alanine was also increased in the TCCSUP (high-grade) cell line compared to the RT4 (low grade) one [28]. An abundance of amino acids is important for the proliferative cancer cells, not only as substrates of protein synthesis, but also for energy generation, cellular redox homeostasis, and nucleotide biosynthesis [41]. Pyruvate consumption and alterations in glycolytic profile have also been related to UBC aggressiveness, as anaerobic conditions in high(er) grade UBC favor the conversion of pyruvate to lactate, or alanine [28]. In our study, and in accordance with previous results, T24 (grade III) exhibited elevated contents of totally 17 amino acids and derivatives, with the highest increase being detected for N-acetylglutamine, glutathione, alanine, and glutamate, together with a 3x increase of lactate. Nucleotides are also involved in biomass build-up observed in cancer cells and in the changes of ATP concentrations that indicate the energetic status (usually crisis) of tumors [42]. In serum samples of UBC patients, the raised levels of hypoxanthine and reduced levels of uracil indicated a perturbed breakdown of purine nucleotides, favoring the purine synthesis pathway (reviewed in ref. [17]). Notably, herein, purine metabolism has emerged as one of the most important networks in our in silico analysis (Figure 4), thus highlighting its major contribution to UBC aggressiveness and progression toward metastasis. Increased contents of hypoxanthine and adenosine nucleotides (AMP/ADP/ATP), with up to a 34x striking increase for AMP, were observed in T24 (grade III), but they were surprisingly restored (again) to the initial (RT4-like) levels in TCCSUP (grade IV) cells. In a study of urine samples derived from UBC patients, it has been suggested that the high(er) levels of choline phosphate may reflect increased lipid membrane remodeling, which has also been reported for other cancers [24,42]. Choline phosphate and, to lower extent, choline contents were also increased in our T24 (grade III) cell-line group, with a 6x and 2x rise, respectively. As expected, the elevated contents of these metabolites were reduced in TCCSUP (grade IV) cells, indicating the activation of a “metabolic inversion” effect. Regarding the two major metabolites involved in osmoregulation and volume regulation, taurine and myo-inositol, contradictory results were previously reported, with either upregulated or downregulated levels detected (reviewed in ref. [17,42]), likely implicating the role of cellular micro-environments in metabolome compositions. Interestingly, herein, significantly elevated contents of myo-inositol (12x) and taurine (5x) were observed in T24 (grade III), indicating the high grade-dependent ability of UBC to regulate osmosis and volume, in favor of promoting cell motility and tumor metastasis.
Taking into account that the majority of the identified metabolites (40 out of 42) were increased in the grade III (T24) group, multivariate analysis and the use of pairwise ratios were employed in order to highlight metabolites with major alterations. Notably, multivariate analysis of the obtained NMR data indicated the importance of, among others, glutamate and myo-inositol level deregulations to UBC pathology, while AXPs (AMP, ADP and ATP), GTP, oxypurinol, and creatine phosphate content increases were presented with the strongest statistical significance in the grade III/I cell pair (III/I). The use of pairwise ratios allowed us to account for dilution and signal instability effects and to unveil alterations that are masked by the “metabolic inversion” phenomenon. Increased ratios were found in III/I for metabolites that were also profiled with a “metabolic inversion” effect in IV/I (e.g., AMP, oxypurinol, myo-inositol, and creatine phosphate); thus, they might critically contribute to UBC advancement. On the other hand, decreased ratios were observed in III/I for several metabolites that were also presented with downregulated proportions in IV/I (e.g., uracil and propylene glycol) and, as such, they could presumably function as UBC-specific “oncosuppressing” modulators/inducers. Further discussion will focus on those metabolites that were herein identified as the most important by both (NMR and LC-MS) applied technologies, and especially the ones with the highest fold change (x) in metabolite levels and the highest alterations in all pairwise metabolic ratios.
Regarding the top two metabolites with the highest elevation contents in grade III (T24) versus grade I (RT4) UBC cells, creatine phosphate and AMP, they were remarkably presented with 23x and 34x positive change (upregulation), respectively (Table 1). Strikingly, by taking uracil as the metabolite of reference (since it was downregulated both in III/I and IV/I cell pairs), their respective fold changes (x) were further increased up to 32x and 50x values (Supplementary Table S5). Since colon cancer-derived liver metastases carry higher creatine kinase brain type (CKB) levels compared to primary tumors [43,44], UBC metastatic populations, in order to overcome hypoxia and other metabolic stresses, may also upregulate CKB expression or/and activity. This allows (after CKB secretion) energy to be likely captured from the extracellular ATP-mediated generation of creatine phosphate and its subsequent SLC6A8-dependent import into metastatic cells to regenerate ATP. Similarly to colon cancer cells [45], hypoxic UBC cells, in the absence of functional Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha (HIF1α) (a key regulator of hypoxia response) pathway, could adapt their energy metabolism via the upregulation of creatine metabolism (and synthesis), thus opening a new chemotherapeutic window for metastatic UBC targeting and management in the clinic. Most importantly, T24 (grade III) cells contain a mutant version of the EP300 (KAT3B/p300) transcriptional co-activator (Supplementary Table S4) (https://depmap.org/portal/cell_line/ACH-000018?tab=mutation), which, in its wild-type form, is required for the transcriptional activation of HIF1α-target genes [46]. This indicates their competence to survive and grow in adverse hypoxic environments through the engagement of HIF1α-independent, but likely creatine-dependent, metabolic pathways. Given that the calculated fold change (x) in the III/I pair for ADP is 20.76x, which is a value close to the 22.99x of creatine phosphate (Table 1) (an approximately 1:1 molecular stoichiometry), T24 (grade III) cells may utilize intracellular creatine phosphate as a phosphate donor to the available ADP to finally produce ATP.
The remarkably elevated content of AMP in T24 (grade III) versus RT4 (grade I) cells indicates its major value for UBC progression toward chemoresistance and metastasis. High levels of ADP and AMP in a cell undergoing energetic stress/crisis cause significant increase in the AMPK kinase activity [47]. Activated AMPK phosphorylates a number of target substrates to regulate cell growth, metabolism, and autophagy [48]. Interestingly, activated H-RAS (G12V) requires autophagy for the maintenance of tumorigenesis [49]. Therefore, it seems that the major AMP/ADP/ATP (AXPs) metabolic reprogramming specifically observed in grade III (T24) cells may be tightly related to the aberrant signaling of the H-RASG12V mutant oncoprotein. If so, H-RASG12V–AMP/ADP–AMPK–autophagy must operate as an indispensable axis for UBC cell survival and growth in unfavorable and adverse (e.g., hypoxic or nutritionally deprived) environments. Since we have previously shown that T24 cells are characterized by constitutively activated basal autophagy [34], the H-RASG12V-induced intracellular energetic stress, in the form of AMP (and ADP) highly upregulated levels (this study), serves as a valuable and powerful metabolic biomarker, with its implicated enzymes/regulators likely opening a new therapeutic window for UBC metastasis and drug tolerance.
Intriguingly, propylene glycol and uracil herein emerged as metabolites that were downregulated in both III/I and IV/I grade cell pairs. Especially for propylene glycol, a prominent reduction in its intracellular contents was observed for both T24 (grade III) and TCCSUP (grade IV) compared to RT4 (grade I) cells of reference. Propylene glycol is produced by the conversion of pyruvaldehyde to lactaldehyde, which is then converted to propylene glycol via the aldehyde reductase mediation. Aldo-keto reductases family 1 members A1 and B1 (AKR1A1 and AKR1B1) are part of the Aldo-keto reductase superfamily and catalyze the reduction of several aldehydes. Data derived from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) platform (https://www.cbioportal.org) strengthen our interpretation for perturbed (compromised) aldehyde reductase activities in advanced metastatic UBC disease, with 16% and 7% of the examined muscle-invasive UBC patients (Bladder Cancer, Cell 2017, z: 1.5) exhibiting deregulated expression/activity of the AKR1A1 and AKR1B1 enzymes, respectively, and 2.67% of them bearing low mRNA levels of the AKR1A1 gene (https://www.cbioportal.org). Thereby, it seems that T24 may have originated from a patient with a molecular signature of downregulated AKR1A1 gene expression in the tumor cells.
A major advantage (and novelty) of the present study is the employment of two complementary, state-of-the-art, analytical platforms: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mass Spectrometry (MS). Their successful combination offers a comprehensive metabolic characterization that covers a variety of chemical structures and concentrations of profiled metabolites. Strikingly, application of the MS-based metabolomics technology led to the detection and identification of novel molecules that could significantly contribute to UBC progression toward metastasis. Two peptides, Tβ4 and Tβ10, were identified with a high confidence level, and proved to be statistically significant both in the discrimination of the four (I, II, III, and IV) groups and of the low(er) or high(er) malignancy grade pairwise comparisons. Members of the β thymosin family form a (1:1) complex with the monomeric G-Actin protein, acting as its sequestration peptides, thus critically controlling actin cytoskeleton dynamics [50]. Furthermore, in contrast to Tβ4, Tβ10 can also directly bind to RAS, inhibiting its signaling activity, in an endothelial cell environment [51]. Nevertheless, in a T24-specific cellular setting, Tβ10 could no longer interact with the mutant H-RASG12V form, thus presumably releasing its aberrant signaling function(s) to drive the oncogenic and metastatic phenotypes of grade III UBC cells. Hence, the strikingly elevated contents of Tβ4 (10x) and Tβ10 (40x) in T24 (grade III) compared to RT4 (grade I; reference) cell line strongly suggest their actin cytoskeleton remodeling-dependent role in UBC advancement to metastasis, with oncogenic H-RASG12V (after its presumable release from Tβ10) also orchestrating UBC aggressiveness and drug/radiation resistance. Accordingly, Tβ10 overexpression correlates with the poor prognosis and progression of UBC disease [52], while Tβ4 expression is associated with clinical outcomes and clinicopathological parameters of UBC patients (it is significantly increased in UBC patients versus normal (control) volunteers) [53]. Most importantly, TCGA-derived data unveiled 6% of muscle-invasive UBC cases (bladder cancer, “amplification” and “mRNA high”, Cell 2017, z: 1.5) to be carrying upregulated levels of TMSB10 gene (encodes Tβ10) expression (https://www.cbioportal.org), thus indicating the in vivo importance of Tβ10 (and Tβ4) to UBC progression toward high-malignancy grades and aggressive metastatic stages that are characterized by resistance to (chemo/radio)therapy, shorter survival of patients, and, generally, poor prognosis.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Chemicals and Reagents
The detailed information for chemicals and reagents is listed in Supplementary Materials.
4.2. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
The UBC human cell lines RT4, RT112, T24, and TCCSUP were used in the present study. RT4 was obtained from ECACC-Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany). RT112 was kindly provided by Professor J.R. Masters (London, England, UK). T24 and TCCSUP were purchased from ATCC-LGC Standards GmbH (Wesel, Germany). All cell lines were derived from urothelial cell carcinomas of human urinary bladder, with RT4 being classified as malignancy grade I, RT112 as grade I–II (II), T24 as grade III, and TCCSUP as grade IV. All four UBC cell lines were authenticated mainly using in-house established technologies. Cell authentication was based on several combinational criteria, such as the cell-specific morphology, growth rate, nutritional requirement, mitotic index, immunofluorescence pattern (e.g., Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) phenotype), mutational load (e.g., H-RAS and TP53), signaling activity (e.g., Akt and p44/42 MAPK {ERK1/2}), protein content, gene-expression profiling, drug response, motility (e.g., wound-healing assay) and tumorigenicity (e.g., xenograft in Severe Combined ImmunoDeficient (SCID) mouse). All four UBC human cell lines were being tested periodically, but, most importantly, they were thoroughly examined just before the commencement of their large-scale growth for the herein implemented metabolomics analysis. The detailed culture conditions are described in the Supplementary Materials.
4.3. Cell Collection and Storage
The analytical protocols of cell collection and storage are described in the Supplementary Materials.
4.4. Metabolomics Experiments
The detailed protocols of metabolomics experiments (e.g., metabolite extraction, sample preparation, NMR, and MS analysis) are described in the Supplementary Materials.
4.5. Data Preprocessing
The binning of NMR spectra was conducted (0.001/0.02 ppm) using the AMIX software. Regions of water and contaminations being observed at the blank solutions were removed from the analysis. Pairwise ratios of the metabolites identified in NMR analysis were also calculated (42 × 42 = 1.764 metabolic traits). In MS analysis, data preprocessing was performed using the XCMS online. Peak-based normalization was applied in order to correct data within the batch experiment. Specifically, a QC-based signal-correction method (QC-RLSC), engaging the non-linear local polynomial regression (LOESS), was performed using the MetaX R package [54]. KNN (K-Nearest Neighbor) imputation for missing values and filtering of features based on the % Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) in QCs were applied.
4.6. Metabolite/Pathway Identification
The Chenomx NMR suite (Chenomx Inc., Alberta, Canada) was utilized for the NMR-mediated metabolite identification. For the recognition of peptides, the mMass peptide tool v. 5.5.0 was suitably employed [55]. The Cytoscape platform was engaged for visualizing molecular networks of significant metabolites derived from the NMR analysis [56,57].
4.7. Statistical Analysis
Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), and Orthogonal Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA), using SIMCA-P 14.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden), were suitably applied. The quality of obtained models was assessed via R2X (variance explained by X Matrix) and Q2 (Goodness of prediction) obtained by 7x cross-validation, parameters, and permutation test results (100 random permutations for the PLS-DA and OPLS-DA models). The Knowledge Discovery by Accuracy Maximization Analysis (KODAMA) R package [58] was performed for the unsupervised extraction of variables in the MS analysis. The selected classifier was PLS-DA, and the procedure was repeated 100 times. Two methods implemented in the same package were used for the ranking of variables’ importance; Kruskal–Wallis test and the model’s loadings. Breiman’s Random-Forest (BR-F) algorithm was also evaluated using the StatTarget tool [59]. A number of 500 grown trees and 20 permutations were imported as model parameters. Multi-ROC AUC was used for the evaluation of methods performance using the multi-ROC R package [60].
5. Conclusions
In the present study, the metabolic landscapes of grade I, II, III, and IV UBC human cell lines were extensively mapped. Obtained results indicated a prominently perturbed amino acid and purine/pyrimidine metabolism with a remarkable increase of most metabolites being identified in grade III (T24) UBC cells, using RT4 (grade I) as the line of reference. Surprisingly, insignificant changes were observed for grade IV (TCCSUP) cells, thus implying the activation of a “metabolic inversion” process. T24 (grade III) has proved the most powerful and versatile cell line, which is able to accurately and reliably unveil the metabolic signature of highly malignant and strongly metastatic UBC pathology. “Metabolic inversion” has to be mechanistically investigated, in order to open new chemotherapeutic windows for UBC advancement to drug-resistant metastasis. Analysis of NMR-derived metabolite contents and ratios showed significant perturbations in purine and pyrimidine metabolism, while MS analysis demonstrated the importance of Tβ4 and Tβ10 peptides to UBC progression toward metastasis. AMP (and ADP) highly upregulated levels indicate the H-RASG12V-induced intracellular energetic stress/crisis, and they can serve as valuable metabolic biomarkers, while the remarkably elevated contents of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in the T24 (grade III) compared to RT4 (grade I) cell line strongly suggest their actin cytoskeleton remodeling-dependent role in UBC advancement to metastasis and drug tolerance. Furthermore, decreased levels of propylene glycol are indicative of dysregulated AKR1A1 gene expression in the tumor cells of urinary bladder, thus rendering it (propylene glycol) as a potentially significant biomarker.
Our work also made use of novel statistical approaches for metabolomics data analysis. Metabolic ratios are strongly suggested to account for the size effect present in the data and to highlight novel metabolic pathways. Hence, their combined employment and biological interpretation are crucial in order to avoid erroneous results. A common bottleneck in the untargeted MS analysis is the selection of important variables. We herein compared the typical PLS-DA method used in metabolomics analyses with other statistical tools carrying different merits and drawbacks (e.g., KODAMA and BF-R). Our results underline the importance of either pairwise comparisons or the implementation of more sophisticated multivariate approaches, such as the Random Forest models, which may exhibit better performances.
Most importantly, the integration of high-resolution metabolic maps with high-scale proteomic profiles containing enzymes/regulators that are able to control the homeostasis of grade-dependent UBC intracellular metabolites will shed light on mechanisms of urothelial bladder tumorigenesis, and they will benefit our tools in terms of the safe, efficient, and generally successful (including reduced medical costs) diagnostic and therapeutic management of the advanced UBC disease in the clinic.
Acknowledgments
Dimitrios J. Stravopodis (DJS) at NKUA devotes the present article to the memory of his beloved mother who suddenly passed away in October 2015.
Abbreviations
AKR1A1/AKR1B1 | Aldo-keto Reductases Family 1 Member(s) A1/B1 |
AUC-ROC | Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve |
BR-F | Breiman’s Random-Forest |
KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
KODAMA | Knowledge Discovery by Accuracy Maximization Analysis |
OPLS-DA | Orthogonal Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis |
PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
PLS-DA | Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis |
QC-RLSC | QC-based Signal-correction Method |
QCs | Quality Control Samples |
UBC | Urothelial Bladder Cancer |
VIP | Variable Importance in Projection |
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/5/1892/s1. References [61,62] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.J.S.; methodology, A.I., A.P., A.F.G., D.B., E.G., E.M. and D.J.S.; software, A.I., A.P., D.B., M.K., E.G. and E.M.; validation, A.I., A.P., A.F.G., D.B., M.K., A.D.V., O.E.T., I.S.P., G.E.V., E.G.K., E.G., E.M. and D.J.S.; resources, E.M. and D.J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I., E.G., E.M. and D.J.S.; writing—review and editing, E.M. and D.J.S.; supervision, D.B., E.M. and D.J.S.; project administration, D.B., E.G., E.M. and D.J.S.; funding acquisition, A.I., E.M. and D.J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Financial support was kindly provided by the: (a) “European Social Fund UoA-MIS 375784” (European Union and Greek National Funds 2012–2015/“THALIS” Program) and (b) “Bodossaki Foundation Donation Program” 2013–2014, Athens, Greece (GR), to Dimitrios J. Stravopodis (DJS). The work herein presented was carried out within the framework of a Stavros Niarchos Foundation (SNF) grant to Aikaterini Iliou (AI) at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece (GR).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Burger M., Catto J.W., Dalbagni G., Grossman H.B., Herr H., Karakiewicz P., Kassouf W., Kiemeney L.A., La Vecchia C., Shariat S., et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2013;63:234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang Z., Lin L., Gao Y., Chen Y., Yan X., Xing J., Hang W. Bladder cancer determination via two urinary metabolites: A biomarker pattern approach. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2011:10. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.007922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Montironi R., Cheng L., Scarpelli M., Lopez-Beltran A. Pathology and genetics: Tumours of the urinary system and male genital system: Clinical implications of the 4th edition of the who classification and beyond. Eur. Urol. 2016;70:120–123. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hurle R., Losa A., Manzetti A., Lembo A. Upper urinary tract tumors developing after treatment of superficial bladder cancer: 7-year follow-up of 591 consecutive patients. Urology. 1999;53:1144–1148. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hansen R.P., Vedsted P., Sokolowski I., Søndergaard J., Olesen F. Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: A cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patients. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2011;11:284. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.James A.C., Gore J.L. The costs of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2013;40:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vlachostergios P.J., Faltas B.M. Treatment resistance in urothelial carcinoma: An evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:495–509. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0026-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Giannopoulou A.F., Velentzas A.D., Konstantakou E.G., Avgeris M., Katarachia S.A., Papandreou N., Kalavros N., Mpakou V.E., Iconomidou V.A., Anastasiadou E., et al. Revisiting histone deacetylases in human tumorigenesis: The paradigm of urothelial bladder cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1291. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nicholson J.K., Lindon J.C., Holmes E. Metabonomics: Understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological nmr spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica. 1999;29:1181–1189. doi: 10.1080/004982599238047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Locasale J.W., Cantley L.C., Heiden M.G.V. Cancer’s insatiable appetite. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009;27:916–917. doi: 10.1038/nbt1009-916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aboud O.A., Weiss R.H. New opportunities from the cancer metabolome. Clin. Chem. 2013;59:138–146. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.184598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DeBerardinis R.J., Chandel N.S. Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1600200. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boroughs L.K., DeBerardinis R.J. Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17:351–359. doi: 10.1038/ncb3124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sahu D., Lotan Y., Wittmann B., Neri B., Hansel D.E. Metabolomics analysis reveals distinct profiles of nonmuscle-invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Med. 2017;6:2106–2120. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Denkert C., Budczies J., Kind T., Weichert W., Tablack P., Sehouli J., Darb-Esfahani S., Könsgen D., Dietel M., Fiehn O. Mass spectrometry-based metabolic profiling reveals different metabolite patterns in invasive ovarian carcinomas and ovarian borderline tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10795–10804. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rodrigues D., Jerónimo C., Henrique R., Belo L., Bastos M.D.L., De Pinho P.G., Carvalho M. Biomarkers in bladder cancer: A metabolomic approach using in vitro and ex vivo model systems. Int. J. Cancer. 2016;139:256–268. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Catchpole G., Platzer A., Weikert C., Kempkensteffen C., Johannsen M., Krause H., Jung K., Miller K., Willmitzer L., Selbig J., et al. Metabolic profiling reveals key metabolic features of renal cell carcinoma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011;15:109–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00939.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cheng Y., Xie G., Chen T., Qiu Y., Zou X., Zheng M., Tan B., Feng B., Dong T., He P., et al. Distinct urinary metabolic profile of human colorectal cancer. J. Proteom. Res. 2012;11:1354–1363. doi: 10.1021/pr201001a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang Q., Tan Y., Yin P., Ye G., Gao P., Lu X., Wang H., Xu G. Metabolic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma using nontargeted tissue metabolomics. Cancer Res. 2013;73:4992–5002. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pendyala L., Velagapudi S., Toth K., Zdanowicz J., Glaves D., Slocum H., Perez R., Huben R., Creaven P.J., Raghavan D. Translational studies of glutathione in bladder cancer cell lines and human specimens. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997;3:793–798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pasikanti K.K., Norasmara J., Cai S., Mahendran R., Esuvaranathan K., Ho P.C., Chan E.C.Y. Metabolic footprinting of tumorigenic and nontumorigenic uroepithelial cells using two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010;398:1285–1293. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bansal N., Gupta A., Mitash N., Shakya P.S., Mandhani A., Mahdi A.A., Sankhwar S.N., Mandal S.K. Low- and high-grade bladder cancer determination via human serum-based metabolomics approach. J. Proteom. Res. 2013;12:5839–5850. doi: 10.1021/pr400859w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wittmann B.M., Stirdivant S.M., Mitchell M., Wulff J.E., McDunn J.E., Li Z., Dennis-Barrie A., Neri B.P., Milburn M.V., Lotan Y., et al. Bladder cancer biomarker discovery using global metabolomic profiling of urine. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tan G., Wang H., Yuan J., Qin W., Dong X., Wu H., Meng P. Three serum metabolite signatures for diagnosing low-grade and high-grade bladder cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:46176. doi: 10.1038/srep46176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kouznetsova V.L., Kim E., Romm E.L., Zhu A., Tsigelny I. Recognition of early and late stages of bladder cancer using metabolites and machine learning. Metabolomics. 2019;15:94. doi: 10.1007/s11306-019-1555-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rodrigues D., Pinto J., Araujo A.M., Jerónimo C., Henrique R., Bastos M.D.L., De Pinho P.G., Carvalho M. Gc-ms metabolomics reveals distinct profiles of low- and high-grade bladder cancer cultured cells. Metabolites. 2019;9:18. doi: 10.3390/metabo9010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Conde V.R., Oliveira P.F., Nunes A.R., Rocha C.S., Ramalhosa E., Pereira J.A., Alves M.G., Silva B.M. The progression from a lower to a higher invasive stage of bladder cancer is associated with severe alterations in glucose and pyruvate metabolism. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;335:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Inzitari R., Cabras T., Pisano E., Fanali C., Manconi B., Scarano E., Faa G. Hplc-esi-ms analysis of oral human fluids reveals that gingival crevicular fluid is the main source of oral thymosins β4 and β10. J. Sep. Sci. 2009;32:57–63. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.León Z., García-Cañaveras J.C., Donato M.T., Lahoz A. Mammalian cell metabolomics: Experimental design and sample preparation. Electrophoresis. 2013;34:2762–2775. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kalluri U., Naiker M., Myers M.A. Cell culture metabolomics in the diagnosis of lung cancer-the influence of cell culture conditions. J. Breath Res. 2014;8:027109. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/8/2/027109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Čuperlović-Culf M., Barnett D., Culf A.S., Chute I. Cell culture metabolomics: Applications and future directions. Drug Discov. Today. 2010;15:610–621. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bi H., Krausz K.W., Manna S.K., Li F., Johnson C.H., Gonzalez F.J. Optimization of harvesting, extraction, and analytical protocols for uplc-esi-ms-based metabolomic analysis of adherent mammalian cancer cells. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013;405:5279–5289. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-6927-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Konstantakou E.G., Voutsinas G.E., Velentzas A.D., Basogianni A.-S., Paronis E., Balafas E., Kostomitsopoulos N., Syrigos K., Anastasiadou E., Stravopodis D.J. 3-brpa eliminates human bladder cancer cells with highly oncogenic signatures via engagement of specific death programs and perturbation of multiple signaling and metabolic determinants. Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:135. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0399-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zheng W., Tayyari F., Gowda G.N., Raftery D., McLamore E.S., Porterfield D.M., Donkin S., Bequette B., Teegarden R. Altered glucose metabolism in harvey-ras transformed mcf10a cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2015;54:111–120. doi: 10.1002/mc.22079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gatenby R.A., Gillies R.J. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koppenol W.H., Bounds P.L., Dang C.V. Otto warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:325–337. doi: 10.1038/nrc3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Harper K.L., Sosa M.S., Entenberg D., Hosseini H., Cheung J.F., Nobre R., Farias E.F. Mechanism of early dissemination and metastasis in her2 mammary cancer. Nature. 2016;540:588–592. doi: 10.1038/nature20609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hosseini H., Obradović M.M.S., Hoffmann M., Harper K.L., Sosa M.S., Werner-Klein M., Nanduri S.L.K., Werno C., Ehrl C., Maneck M., et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;540:552–558. doi: 10.1038/nature20785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yachida S., Jones S., Bozic I., Antal T., Leary R., Fu B., Kamiyama M., Hruban R.H., Eshleman J.R., Nowak M.A., et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–1117. doi: 10.1038/nature09515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vettore L., Westbrook R.L., Tennant D.A. New aspects of amino acid metabolism in cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2020;122:150–156. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0620-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Griffin J.L., Shockcor J.P. Metabolic profiles of cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:551–561. doi: 10.1038/nrc1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Loo J.M., Scherl A., Nguyen A., Man F.Y., Weinberg E., Zeng Z., Saltz L.B., Paty P.B., Tavazoie S.F. Extracellular metabolic energetics can promote cancer progression. Cell. 2015;160:393–406. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sullivan W.J., Christofk H.R. The metabolic milieu of metastases. Cell. 2015;160:363–364. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Valli A., Morotti M., Zois C.E., Albers P.K., Soga T., Feldinger K., Fischer R., Frejno M., McIntyre A., Bridges E., et al. Adaptation to hif1α deletion in hypoxic cancer cells by upregulation of glut14 and creatine metabolism. Mol. Cancer Res. 2019;17:1531–1544. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kung A., Zabludoff S.D., France D.S., Freedman S.J., Tanner E.A., Vieira A., Cornell-Kennon S., Lee J., Wang B., Wang J., et al. Small molecule blockade of transcriptional coactivation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hardie D.G., Ross F.A., Hawley S.A. Ampk: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:251–262. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mihaylova M.M., Shaw R.J. The ampk signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1016–1023. doi: 10.1038/ncb2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Guo J.Y., Chen H.-Y., Mathew R., Fan J., Strohecker A.M., Karsli-Uzunbas G., Kamphorst J.J., Chen G., Lemons J.M., Karantza V., et al. Activated ras requires autophagy to maintain oxidative metabolism and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2011;25:460–470. doi: 10.1101/gad.2016311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sribenja S., Wongkham S., Wongkham C., Yao Q.C., Chen C. Roles and mechanisms of β-thymosins in cell migration and cancer metastasis: An update. Cancer Investig. 2013;31:103–110. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2012.756111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lee S.H., Son M.J., Oh S.H., Rho S.B., Park K., Kim Y.J., Lee J.H. Thymosin β10 inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth by interfering with ras function. Cancer Res. 2005;65:137–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang B., Wang Z., Zhang T., Yang G. Overexpression of thymosin β10 correlates with disease progression and poor prognosis in bladder cancer. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019;18:3759–3766. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang Z.Y., Zhang W., Yang J., Song D.K., Wei J.X., Gao S. Association of thymosin β4 expression with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes of bladder cancer patients. Neoplasma. 2016;63:991–998. doi: 10.4149/neo_2016_619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wen B., Mei Z., Zeng C., Liu S. Metax: A flexible and comprehensive software for processing metabolomics data. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18:183. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1579-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Strohalm M., Kavan D., Novák P., Volny M., Havlicek V. Mmass 3: A cross-platform software environment for precise analysis of mass spectrometric data. Anal. Chem. 2010;82:4648–4651. doi: 10.1021/ac100818g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gao J., Tarcea V.G., Karnovsky A., Mirel B.R., Weymouth T.E., Beecher C.W., Cavalcoli J.D., Athey B., Omenn G.S., Burant C., et al. Metscape: A cytoscape plug-in for visualizing and interpreting metabolomic data in the context of human metabolic networks. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:971–973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Wang J.T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cacciatore S., Tenori L., Luchinat C., Bennett P.R., MacIntyre D.A. Kodama: An r package for knowledge discovery and data mining. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:621–623. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Luan H., Ji F., Chen Y., Cai Z. Stattarget: A streamlined tool for signal drift correction and interpretations of quantitative mass spectrometry-based omics data. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2018;1036:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Robin X., Turck N., Hainard A., Tiberti N., Lisacek F., Sanchez J.-C., Müller M. Proc: An open-source package for r and s+ to analyze and compare roc curves. Bmc Bioinform. 2011;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wu H., Southam A.D., Hines A., Viant M.R. High-throughput tissue extraction protocol for NMR- and MS-based metabolomics. Anal. Biochem. 2008;372:204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dunn W.B., Broadhurst D., Begley P., Zelena E., Francis-McIntyre S., Anderson N., Brown M., Knowles J.D., Halsall A., Haselden J.N., et al. Procedures for large-scale metabolic profiling of serum and plasma using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2011;6:1060–1083. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.