The genus Fusarium represents a ubiquitous group of fungi found in most natural substrates as either pathogens or non-pathogens associated with other fungi, plants and animals including humans (Leslie & Summerell 2006, Aoki et al. 2014). These fungi are also well-known for their ability to produce a cocktail of secondary metabolites that include important mycotoxins that pose a significant health risk to animals, humans and plants (Marasas et al. 1985, Logrieco et al. 2002, O’Donnell et al. 2018). Therefore, it is not unusual for this genus to be rated among the top 10 most economically and scientifically important plant pathogenic genera (Dean et al. 2012). However, as a large number of Fusarium species complexes include numerous cryptic species, several taxonomic/classification systems, most not subject to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN; Thurland et al. 2018), have been applied, sometimes resulting in erroneous assumptions. Furthermore, the lack of living ex-type cultures for several important Fusarium species has been a serious stumbling block in providing Latin binomials for several economically important cryptic Fusarium species.
Recent developments in the taxonomy of Fusarium and allied genera resulted in improved phylogenetic backbones for many species complexes (Guarnaccia et al. 2018, Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018, Maryani et al. 2019a, Lombard et al. 2019b, Sandoval-Denis & Crous 2019). However, much effort is still needed to fully discern the complexity of such a diverse group of taxa. This dedicated volume accommodates five papers mainly focusing on providing taxonomic stability to two important Fusarium species complexes (F. oxysporum (FOSC) and F. incarnatum-equiseti (FIESC)), and the related genus Neocosmospora. The intention of this volume is to highlight the importance of nomenclatural type studies to provide a stable platform for phylogenetic research to allow for the naming of cryptic species.
Fusarium oxysporum is probably the most commonly encountered species of Fusarium, and ranked fifth in the top 10 list of plant pathogenic fungi (Dean et al. 2012). This soil-borne asexual fungus includes both pathogenic (plants and animals, including humans) and non-pathogenic strains that display a complex phylogenetic structure of cryptic species. In the paper by Lombard et al. (2019a), F. oxysporum s.str. is epitypified to allow for the formal naming of 15 of these cryptic taxa. In addition, the various subspecific classification systems used for the FOSC are discussed, highlighting their limitations.
Panama disease, a devastating Fusarium wilt of both wild and cultivated banana, is associated with species in the FOSC (Maryani et al. 2019a), which have been well studied in recent years (Fourie et al. 2011, Ordonez et al. 2015). However, limited information is available on non-FOSC Fusarium species also isolated in association with pathogenic Fusarium species causing Panama disease of banana. An extensive survey of local banana varieties in Indonesia resulted in a collection of 20 non-FOSC that were shown to belong to the F. fujikuroi (FFSC), FIESC and F. sambucinum (FSSC) species complexes, including five novel species for which Koch’s postulates were tested (Maryani et al. 2019b).
Members of the FIESC include saprobes, fungicolous species, secondary invaders and pathogens of animals, humans and plants (O’Donnell et al. 2009, 2012, Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018). Using multi-locus phylogenies and Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR), over 30 phylogenetic species have been recognised in this complex (O’Donnell et al. 2009, 2012, Villani et al. 2016, Maryani et al. 2019b, Santos et al. 2019, Torbati et al. 2019) for which less than 10 phylogenetic species have been provided with Latin binomials. This problem relates to the lack of nomenclatural types for several Fusarium species in this complex. In a survey of more than 22 plant species collected in eight provinces of China a total of 77 isolates were found to include 14 species in the FIESC, which included nine novel species provided with Latin binomials (Wang et al. 2019). Following this, Xia et al. (2019) provided more taxonomic stability to the FIESC through the epitypification of F. compactum, F. incarnatum and F. scirpi, and neotypification of F. camptoceras. This allowed for naming of 20 newly resolved and previously known phylogenetic species in the FIESC that lacked formal descriptions.
The genus Neocosmospora, previously known as the F. solani species complex, is ubiquitous, including saprobes, insect symbiont species as well as plant endophytes and important pathogens (animals, humans and plants) (Guarnaccia et al. 2018, Sandoval-Denis et al. 2018, Sandoval-Denis & Crous 2019). This genus encompasses a poorly characterised species-rich diversity, only now becoming evident through modern phylogenetic studies. However, several species in this genus lack nomenclatural types, placing a serious constraint on providing Latin binomials to new as well as already recognised phylogenetic species. In the monograph of Sandoval-Denis et al. (2019), a large number of type specimens and representative cultures were examined by means of morphology and phylogenetic inference. Through epi-, neo- and lectotypification, 68 species are now accepted in Neocosmospora, which also includes 13 new combinations and 29 new species. A further 11 recognised phylogenetic species remain undescribed and 17 doubtful or excluded taxa are also briefly discussed.
Given the ubiquitous nature of Fusarium, and its importance as plant, human and animal pathogen, the incredibly high number of undescribed species that still exist in nature pose a serious threat for future food and fibre security. Furthermore, the high number of ‘known’ Fusarium species that are not tied to genetically well-characterised ex-type cultures is also a serious cause for concern. Papers in this volume provide an onset in addressing this issue, and clearly highlight the importance of nomenclatural type studies in resolving taxonomic difficulties surrounding important species complexes in the genera Fusarium and Neocosmospora. Making these types and associated DNA barcodes easily accessible through accessible public collections and databases is therefore of the utmost importance for future studies.
REFERENCES
- Aoki T, O’Donnell K, Geiser DM. 2014. Systematics of key phytopathogenic Fusarium species: current status and future challenges. Journal of General Plant Pathology 80: 189–201. [Google Scholar]
- Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, et al. 2012. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology 13: 414–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fourie G, Steenkamp ET, Ploetz RC, et al. 2011. Current status of the taxonomic position of Fusarium oxysporum formae specialis cubense within the Fusarium oxysporum complex. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11: 533–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarnaccia V, Sandoval-Denis M, Aiello D, et al. 2018. Neocosmospora perseae sp. nov., causing trunk cankers on avocado in Italy. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 1: 131–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie JF, Summerell BA. 2006. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishing Professional, Ames. [Google Scholar]
- Logrieco A, Mulè G, Moretti , et al. 2002. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with maize ear rot in Europe. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108: 597–609. [Google Scholar]
- Lombard L, Sandoval-Denis M, Lamprecht SC, et al. 2019a. Epitypification of Fusarium oxysporum – clearing the taxonomic chaos. Persoonia 43: 1–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lombard L, Van Doorn R, Crous PW. 2019b. Neotypification of Fusarium chlamydosporum – a reappraisal of a clinically important species complex. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 4: 183–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marasas WFO, Nelson PE, Toussoun TA. 1985. Toxigenic Fusarium species. Identity and mycotoxicology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Maryani N, Lombard L, Poerba YS, et al. 2019a. Phylogeny and genetic diversity of the banana Fusarium wilt pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense in the Indonesian centre of origin. Studies in Mycology 92: 155–194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maryani N, Sandoval-Denis M, Lombard L, et al. 2019b. New endemic Fusarium species hitch-hiking with pathogenic Fusarium strains causing Panama disease in small-holder banana plots in Indonesia. Persoonia 43: 48–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Donnell K, Humber RA, Geiser DM, et al. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity of insecticolous fusaria inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and their molecular identification via FUSARIUM-ID and Fusarium MLST. Mycologia 104: 427–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Donnell K, McCormick SP, Busman M, et al. 2018. Marasas et al. 1984 “Toxigenic Fusarium species: Identity and mycotoxicology” revisited. Mycologia 110: 1058–1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Donnell K, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG, et al. 2009. Novel multilocus sequence typing scheme reveals high genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti and F. chlamydosporum species complexes within the United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47: 3851–3861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ordonez N, Seidl MF, Waalwijk C, et al. 2015. Worse comes to worse: Bananas and Panama disease. When plant and pathogen clones meet. PLoS Pathogens 11: e1005197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandoval-Denis M, Crous PW. 2019. Removing chaos from confusion: assigning names to common human and animal pathogens in Neocosmospora. Persoonia 41: 109–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandoval-Denis M, Guarnaccia V, Polizzi G, et al. 2018. Symptomatic Citrus trees reveal a new pathogenic lineage in Fusarium and two new Neocosmospora species. Persoonia 40: 1–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandoval-Denis M, Lombard L, Crous PW. 2019. Back to the roots: a reappraisal of Neocosmospora. Persoonia 43: 90–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos ACDS, Trindade JVC, Lima CS, et al. 2019. Morphology, phylogeny, and sexual stage of Fusarium caatingaense and Fusarium pernambucanum, new species of the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex associated with insects in Brazil. Mycologia 111: 244–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thurland NJ, Wiersma JH, Barbie FR, et al. (eds). 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code). Koeltz Botanical Books. [Regnum Vegetabile 159]. [Google Scholar]
- Torbati M, Arzanlou M, Sandoval-Denis M, et al. 2019. Multigene phylogeny reveals new fungicolous species in the Fusarium tricinctum species complex and novel hosts in the genus Fusarium from Iran. Mycological Progress 18: 119–133. [Google Scholar]
- Villani A, Moretti A, De Saeger S, et al. 2016. A polyphasic approach for characterization of a collection of cereal isolates of the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex. International Journal of Food Microbiology 234: 24–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang MM, Chen Q, Diao YZ, et al. 2019. Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti complex from China. Persoonia 43: 70–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xia JW, Sandoval-Denis M, Crous PW, et al. 2019. Numbers to names – restyling the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti species complex. Persoonia 43: 186–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
