Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 1991;119(3):175–180. doi: 10.1007/BF01310668

A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of sialodacryoadenitis virus, Parker's rat coronavirus, and mouse hepatitis virus-infected cells as a source of antigen for the detection of antibody to rat coronaviruses

D H Percy 1, K L Williams 1, F X Paturzo 2
PMCID: PMC7087136  PMID: 1877886

Summary

Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique.

Keywords: Hepatitis, Infectious Disease, Infected Cell, Antibody Titer, Hepatitis Virus

References

  • 1.Bhatt PN, Percy DH, Jonas AM. Characterization of the virus of sialodacryoadenitis of rats: a member of the coronavirus group. J Infect Dis. 1972;126:123–130. doi: 10.1093/infdis/126.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacoby RO, Bhatt PN, Jonas AM, et al. Coronaviruses. In: Baker HJ, et al., editors. The laboratory rat. Biology and diseases. New York: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 284–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parker JC, Cross SS, Rowe WP. Rat coronavirus (RCV): a prevalent, naturally-occurring pneumotropic virus of rats. Arch Ges Virusforsch. 1970;31:293–302. doi: 10.1007/BF01253764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Percy DH, Bond SJ, MacInnes JI. Replication of sialodacryoadenitis virus in mouse L-2 cells. Arch Virol. 1989;104:323–333. doi: 10.1007/BF01315553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Percy DH, Williams KL, Bond SJ, MacInnes JI. Characteristics of Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) replicated in L-2 cells. Arch Virol. 1990;112:195–202. doi: 10.1007/BF01323164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith AL. An immunofluorescence test for detection of serum antibody to rodent coronaviruses. Lab Anim Sci. 1983;33:157–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith AL, Winogard DF. Two enzyme immunoassays for detection of antibody to rodent coronaviruses. J Virol Methods. 1986;14:335–343. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(86)90035-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wojcinski ZW, Percy DH. Sialodacryoadenitis virus-associated lesions in the lower respiratory tract of rats. Vet Pahtol. 1986;23:278–286. doi: 10.1177/030098588602300308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Virology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES