Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jun 19;8(1):388–391.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.054

Fish oil supplementation during pregnancy is protective against asthma/wheeze in offspring

Priyadarshini Kachroo 1,*, Rachel S Kelly 1, Hooman Mirzakhani 1, Kathleen Lee-Sarwar 1, Bo L Chawes 2, Kevin Blighe 1, Ganmaa Davaasambuu 1,3, Hans Bisgaard 2, Augusto A Litonjua 4, Scott T Weiss 1,5, Jessica Lasky-Su 1,*
PMCID: PMC7087445  NIHMSID: NIHMS1534299  PMID: 31226448

Trial Registration:

The trial was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the participating institutions and at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and is registered with NCT00920621). Written informed consent was obtained from all women at recruitment.

To the Editor

The diagnosis of asthma in childhood has doubled in recent decades and is now estimated to affect as many as one in five young children across the USA and Europe1,2. Attempts at early intervention and prevention, such as encouraging breastfeeding, administering probiotics, and reducing exposure to allergens have not lowered the incidence2. Prenatal supplementation with Vitamin D33 and fish oil derived fatty acids (i.e. n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs))4 such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have recently been shown to reduce asthma/recurrent wheeze in children5. An inverse association has also been reported between low maternal EPA, DHA, and total n-3 fatty acid levels during pregnancy with increased risk of non-atopic persistent wheeze in their offspring by the age of 6 years5. However, a complete understanding of how these nutritional interventions, and their potential interactions may affect asthma development remains limited. The aims of this current study were two-fold: (1) to assess the relationship between fish oil supplementation during pregnancy (derived using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)) with asthma/recurrent wheeze in offspring by age three; and (2) to evaluate a possible interaction effect between prenatal fish oil supplementation and prenatal vitamin D3 levels on the development of asthma/recurrent wheeze. We used children from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART) which enrolled 881 pregnant women at 10–18 weeks gestation, randomized them to 400 IU vs. 4,400 IU of vitamin D3, then followed these women and their offspring for the development of asthma/recurrent wheeze by age three, as described previously3,6. Of these 881 pregnant women, a total of 804 (91.26%) mother-child pairs completed the FFQ at 10–18 weeks of gestation (1st trimester); of these 776 (88.08%) mother-child pairs also completed the FFQ at 32–38 weeks of gestation (3rd trimester).

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the effect of fish oil on asthma/wheeze. Specifically, we utilized fish oil supplementation measures from the FFQ that were taken in the form of capsules (yes/no) during the 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This measure of maternal fish oil supplementation and an interaction term for fish oil supplementation and baseline 25OHD (deficient concentration <30 ng/mL versus sufficient 25OHD concentration ≥30 ng/mL)3,7, were used as predictors in a model to assess their association with the incidence of physician-diagnosed asthma/recurrent wheeze at age three years in the offspring, as defined in the primary VDAART paper3 and in the online supplement (see article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org). While we have previously shown that vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy reduced the risk of asthma and recurrent wheeze in 3-year old children6, we observed that the effect was dependent on the maternal level of 25OHD at entry into the trial3. Thus, this analysis only used 25OHD levels at baseline as the index of exposure to prenatal vitamin D. Fish oil dosage was defined by the strength (in mg) of each capsule mother takes per week. We considered fish oil intake in both the 1st and the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Survival analysis utilizing a Weibull regression model8 was also used to assess the fish oil and asthma/recurrent wheeze relationship in the first three years of life. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) based metabolomic profiling conducted at the Broad Institute (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA) was performed on plasma samples from a subset of women9 at the 1st trimester (n=107, including seven mothers (6.5%) who reported taking fish oil supplements) and the 3rd trimester (n=103, including five mothers (4.9%) who reported taking fish oil supplements). Two n-3 LCPUFAs metabolites: eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) were evaluated using univariate regression models for an association with asthma/recurrent wheeze and with fish oil intake. Given the prior literature, we hypothesized that fish oil and Vitamin D reduce the risk of asthma/wheeze in offspring, and therefore utilized one-sided P values and confidence intervals to test these associations. Analyses were conducted using statistical software R version 3.2.3, and the CRAN survival package.

Of the 804 mothers with FFQ data from the 1st trimester, 50 mothers (6.2%) took fish oil supplements and 175 mothers (21.8%) had sufficient levels of 25OHD (Table E1). The univariate regression models found that both fish oil supplementation (OR=0.41; 95% CI: −∞, 0.81; one-sided P=0.016) and sufficient 25OHD levels (OR=0.61; 95% CI: −∞, 0.87; one-sided P=0.010) in the 1st trimester were significantly associated with a reduced risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze among offspring (Table 1). The Weibull analysis gave similar results: the risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze was significantly lower among children of mothers who took prenatal fish oil (14% versus 28%, N=804, Figure 1, HR=0.45; 95% CI −∞, 0.84; one-sided P=0.018). There was no statistically significant interaction of fish oil supplementation with 25OHD levels (OR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.12, 5.25; P=0.473) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Association of fish oil and baseline 25OHD (univariate models); fish oil and baseline 25OHD interaction (multivariate interaction model) in mothers at 1st (N=804; 50 with fish oil intake, 175 with sufficient 25OHD) and 3rd trimester (N=776; 40 with fish oil intake, 421 with sufficient 25OHD): with asthma/wheeze in children by age 3 years (logistic regression models). Univariate dose-response model highlights the effect of fish oil on asthma/wheeze when stratified by dosage. For the 3rd trimester, duration of supplementation was supported by a test for trend and analyzing the categories comparing the mothers with fish oil intake in both 1st and 3rd trimester (N=24) to those that took it at either one time point (N=42) or not at all (N=710).

Models for outcome asthma/wheeze N OR One-sided (95% CI) One-sided P-value Test for trend

1st trimester 804

Univariate models
  Fish oil 47 0.41 −∞, 0.81 0.016
  Maternal 25OHD 163 0.61 −∞, 0.87 0.010
  DHA 107 0.43 −∞, 0.96 0.042
  EPA 107 0.80 −∞, 1.52 0.288

Univariate dose response

  Fish oil dose (Test for trend) 747 0.64 −∞, 0.88 0.010

   No fish oil 701 1.00
   Fish oil dose < 250mg 11 0.88 −∞, 2.69 0.424
   Fish oil dose >=250mg and <500mg 9 0.67 −∞, 2.52 0.308
   Fish oil dose >=500mg 26 0.19 −∞, 0.66 0.014

Multivariate interaction model

  Fish oil 47 0.45 −∞, 1.03 0.056
  Maternal 25OHD 163 0.64 −∞, 0.91 0.020
  Fish oil × 25OHD* 19 0.94 0.12, 5.25 0.946

3rd trimester 776

Univariate models

  Duration of fish oil supplementation (Test for trend) 722 0.65 −∞, 0.97 0.039

   No fish oil intake 661 1.00
   Either time point 39 0.72 −∞, 1.36 0.196
   Intake in both 1st and 3rd trimester 22 0.38 −∞, 1.06 0.060

  Maternal 25OHD 395 0.68 −∞, 0.89 0.010
  DHA 103 0.49 −∞, 1.07 0.067
  EPA 103 0.44 −∞, 0.92 0.034
#

N: Subjects with available data for the predictor and the outcome asthma/recurrent wheeze in models

Abbreviations: 25OHD: 25-hydroxyvitamin D, EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid Missing data: Asthma/wheeze status was missing for 57 mothers in the 1st trimester and 54 mothers analyzed in the 3rd trimester. Baseline 25OHD was missing for four mothers in the 1st trimester and nine mothers in the 3rd trimester.

*

Two-sided P-Values and CIs for the interaction term

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates demonstrating offspring’s asthma or recurrent wheeze free proportion by fish oil intake status. The red curve corresponds to offspring from mothers who took fish oil (Fish oil positive) and blue curve to those from mothers who did not take fish oil (Fish oil negative). In this time to event analysis, the event corresponds to either the occurrence of asthma or recurrent wheeze. The hazard ratio (HR) for time to first event of either asthma or recurrent wheeze by age 3 years obtained using Weibull regression model was 0.45 (One-sided 95% CI −∞, 0.84; one-sided P=0.018).

Analysis of fish oil into dosage categories suggested that the protective effect of fish oil was driven by the highest doses; with the greatest decrease in risk seen in those women who took more than 500 mg/week (N=28) relative to those women who took none (OR=0.19; 95% CI: −∞, 0.66; one-sided P=0.014) (Table 1). A test for trend also supported the fish oil intake asthma/recurrent wheeze relationship, with an increased protective effect seen with increased dosage of fish oil (one-sided P=0.010). Fish oil supplementation remained protective against asthma/wheeze after adjusting for potential confounders (maternal education and race) (Table E2, OR= 0.49; 95% CI: −∞, 0.99; one-sided P=0.047), however due to low numbers in certain strata when accounting for these variables, these analyses were unstable (Table E1). Ninety-two percent of the 50 women who took fish oil supplements were college graduates compared to 60% of the non-users, and 70% were white compared to 39% respectively (Table E1). Replication in a larger population is necessary to fully assess the effect of these variables on the outcome.

Twenty-four of the 50 mothers continued to take fish oil supplements in the 3rd trimester. We observed the greatest reduction in risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze among the offspring of these 24 mothers who took fish oil during both the 1st and 3rd trimesters compared to none at all (OR=0.38; 95% CI: −∞, 1.06; one-sided P=0.06, Table 1). The increased reduction in risk with duration of supplementation was supported by a test for trend (one-sided P=0.039).

Additionally, although we were underpowered to investigate PUFAs in the mothers, higher levels of DHA in the mothers during their 1st trimester were significantly associated with a reduced risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze among their offspring (OR=0.43; 95% CI: −∞, 0.96; one-sided P=0.042, Table 1). Similarly, higher levels of EPA also demonstrated a decreased risk, although this association did not meet statistical significance (OR=0.80; 95% CI: −∞, 1.52; one-sided P=0.288, Table 1). In the 3rd trimester, there was evidence of a decreased risk of asthma/wheeze in offspring with increasing maternal PUFA levels: EPA (OR=0.43; 95% CI: −∞, 0.92; one-sided P=0.034, Table 1) and DHA (OR=0.49; 95% CI: −∞, 1.07; one- sided P=0.067, Table 1). Blood metabolite levels for both EPA (Estimate: 0.91; 95% CI: −∞, 1.30; one-sided P= 9.9 × 10−5) and DHA (Estimate: 0.68; 95% CI: −∞, 1.03; one-sided P=9.7 × 10−4) reached statistical significance in the 3st trimester (Table E3); EPA’s effect was also significant in the 1st trimester (Estimate: 0.55; 95% CI: −∞, 0.91; one-sided P= 5.7 × 10−3, Table E3). Therefore, these findings are consistent with the FFQ analyses; one of the most frequently employed methods for nutritional epidemiological investigations10. The main strength of this study is the assessment of the relationship between PUFA intake and asthma/wheeze utilizing the FFQ. Our results suggest that there is a protective effect of maternal fish oil intake on the development of asthma/recurrent wheeze in offspring during the first three years of their life, which is in agreement with the study by Bisgaard et al.6. The results based on maternal PUFA levels also support this conclusion. Moreover, there is evidence of a dose-response protective effect against asthma/recurrent wheeze. We did not identify a significant interaction between fish oil supplementation and baseline 25OHD, which is again consistent with Bisgaard et al’s findings.6 In conclusion, both fish oil and vitamin D3 are recommended during pregnancy; however, a more comprehensive assessment of vitamin D3 and fish oil supplementation during pregnancy may provide further insight into the biological mechanisms at play.

Supplementary Material

1

Clinical Implications:

Early life asthma represents a significant public health burden. Prenatal supplementation with fish oil derived fatty acids (i.e. n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs)) and Vitamin D3 could modulate the risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze in offspring.

Acknowledgments:

We thank all the participants and investigators of the VDAART clinical trial. AAL and STW designed the VDAART clinical trial. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Funding support: This study has received research support for the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART) by U01 HL091528 (to S.T.W and A.A.L.) and 1R01HL123915-01 (to J.L.S), from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Footnotes

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: JL-S has been a consultant to Metabolon Inc. (North Carolina). AAL has received author royalties from UpToDate, Inc. and consultant fees from AstraZeneca, LP. The rest of the authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References:

  • 1.Bisgaard H, Szefler S. Prevalence of asthma-like symptoms in young children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42:723–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lasso-Pirot A, Delgado-Villalta S, Spanier AJ. Early childhood wheezers: identifying asthma in later life. J Asthma Allergy. 2015;8:63–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, McElrath TF, O’Connor GT, et al. Effect of Prenatal Supplementation With Vitamin D on Asthma or Recurrent Wheezing in Offspring by Age 3 Years: The VDAART Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;315:362–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bisgaard H, Stokholm J, Chawes BL, Vissing NH, Bjarnadottir E, Schoos A-MM, et al. Fish Oil-Derived Fatty Acids in Pregnancy and Wheeze and Asthma in Offspring. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2530–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pike KC, Calder PC, Inskip HM, Robinson SM, Roberts GC, Cooper C, et al. Maternal plasma phosphatidylcholine fatty acids and atopy and wheeze in the offspring at age of 6 years. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:474613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wolsk HM, Chawes BL, Litonjua AA, Hollis BW, Waage J, Stokholm J, et al. Prenatal vitamin D supplementation reduces risk of asthma/recurrent wheeze in early childhood: A combined analysis of two randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Litonjua AA, Lange NE, Carey VJ, Brown S, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, et al. The Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART): rationale, design, and methods of a randomized, controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy for the primary prevention of asthma and allergies in children. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;38:37–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kleinbaum David GKM Survival analysis a self-learning text. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kelly RS, Croteau-Chonka DC, Dahlin A, Mirzakhani H, Wu AC, Wan ES, et al. Integration of metabolomic and transcriptomic networks in pregnant women reveals biological pathways and predictive signatures associated with preeclampsia. Metabolomics. 2017;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Naska A, Lagiou A, Lagiou P. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: current state of the art and future prospects. F1000Research. 2017;6:926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES