Abstract
Camelids (llamas, alpacas, vicuñas, guanacos) are important for the economy of South America and Eimeria infections are important as cause of mortality in camelids. Of the five most prevalent species of Eimeria in South American camelids, Eimeria macusaniensis, Eimeria lamae, Eimeria alpacae, Eimeria punoensis, and Eimeria ivitaensis, E. macusaniensis is considered the most pathogenic. There is considerable confusion concerning the endogenous developmental stages of Eimeria spp. in camelids. Many papers on camelid coccidiosis were published in local Peruvian journals, not easily accessible to wider audience. The objective of the present paper is to summarize information on history, validity of Eimeria species, life cycle, pathogenicity, prevalence, epidemiology, diagnosis, and control of coccidiosis in camelids.
Keywords: Vicuñas (Lama vicugna), Llamas (Lama glama), Alpaca (Lama pacos), Guanacos (Lama guanicoe), Eimeria species
Introduction
The South American camelids consist of four species—llamas (Lama glama), alpacas (Lama pacos), guanacos (Lama guanicoe), and vicuñas (Lama vicugna); their generic nomenclature is controversial. I have used the genus Lama for all four species. Traditionally, they are distributed at high altitudes (3600–5400 m) in South America where they are source of meat, hide, fiber, transport and their feces are used for fuel and fertilizer (Díaz et al. 2016). In many countries, such as the USA, they are reared for recreation and the commercial product is a live animal. Coccidiosis is an important cause of mortality in llamas and alpacas. There are many uncertainties concerning the life cycle of Eimeria species in camelids and early literature from Peru is in local journals, not easily accessible. The object of this review is to summarize information on coccidiosis in camelids.
Species of Eimeria in camelids
There are five common species of Eimeria in South American camelids (Table 1). They are morphologically so different in size and shape that species can be identified without the need of sporulation (Fig. 1). Of these, E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis are one of the largest among species of Eimeria in general (Levine 1973).
Table 1.
Character | E. macusaniensis | E. lamae | E. alpacae | E. punoensis | E. ivitaensis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oocyst shape | Ovoid, piriform | Ellipsoidal, ovoid | Ellipsoidal, ovoid | Ellipsoidal, ovoid | Ellipsoidal |
Sizea |
81–107 × 61–80 100–110 × 77–84 b |
30–40 × 21–30 35–38 × 26–30 |
22–26 × 18–21 24–27 × 22–24 |
17–22 × 14–18 | 83.5–98.6 × 49.3–59.1 |
Mean |
93.6 × 67.4 106.6 × 80.5 |
35.6 × 24.5 36.7 × 28. 9 |
24.1 × 19.6 25.8 × 22.9 |
19.9 × 16.4 | 88.8 × 51.8 |
Wall thickness | 8.3–11.4 | 1.4–1.8 | 1.2–1.6 | 0.8–1.1 | 4.0–4.5 |
Micropylar cap | 2–5 high, 9–14 wide | 1.5–2.2 high, 8.8–11.4 wide | 0.7–1.3 high, 4.4–7.5 wide | 0.4–0.8 high, 3.5–5.5 wide | Absentc |
Sporocyst shape | Elongate | Elongate, ovoid | Elongate, ovoid | Elongate | |
Size range |
33–40 × 16–20 44–48 × 20–23 |
13–16 × 8–10 17–20 × 9–12 |
10–13 × 7–8 10–12 × 7–9 |
8–11 × 5–7 | 32.6–40.8 × 11.9–13.6 |
Mean |
36.3 × 18.3 45.2 × 22.6 |
15.2 × 8.5 18.6 × 10.7 |
11.0 × 6.8 11.3 × 7.8 |
9.2 × 6.1 | 35.4 × 13.1 |
Stieda body | Faint | Present | Faint | Faint | Not described |
Original host | Lama pacos | Lama pacos | Lama pacos | Lama pacos | Lama pacos |
Reference | Guerrero et al. (1971) | Guerrero (1967a, b) | Guerrero (1967a, b) | Guerrero (1967a, b) | Leguía and Casas (1998) |
aThe measurements are in μm. Guerrero (1967a, b) measured 50 or more oocysts and sporocysts; the number of specimens measured by Leguia and Casas (1998) and Schrey et al. (1991) was not stated
bFigures in bold are from oocysts in Lama glama (Schrey et al. 1991)
cAbsent in original description of Leguía and Casas (1998) but present in some oocysts (see Fig. 1)
The sporulation time differs among these Eimeria species. Eimeria macusaniensis oocysts take longer time to sporulate, perhaps related to the thickness of the oocyst wall. Temperature of incubation can also affect sporulation; E. macusaniensis oocysts sporulated in 9 days at 30 °C, in 21 days at 18–25 °C but oocysts did not sporulate at 6–7 °C (Rohbeck 2006).
History
Eimeria macusaniensis oocysts are morphologically and biologically distinctive, resembling watermelon seed or a cut avocado; its oocysts are up to 107 μm long, have a very thick wall, and prepatent period is > 30 days. Examination of coprolites and llama mummies dating about 10,000 years (Halocene period) in Patagonia, Argentina found E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis oocysts (Martinson et al. 2003; Fugassa et al. 2008, 2010; Velázquez et al. 2014; Taglioretti et al. 2014, 2015); shape and sizes of these oocysts were remarkably preserved (Fugassa et al. 2008). Similar findings are reported for coprolites from Chile dating to Pre-Inca Hispanic Contact Period (de Souza et al. 2018).
Although coccidia have been recognized for more than two centuries (Levine 1973), little attention was paid to coccidia in camelids. Yakimoff (1934) in Leningrad, Russia first reported Eimeria infection in feces of one of the five llama fecal samples sent to him by Professor Iwanoff; nothing was said who collected samples and the locality. Yakimoff (1934) named the parasite, Eimeria peruviana, n.sp. The oocysts were 27.9–37.5 × 18–22 μm with 10.5–15.0 × 7.5 μm sporocysts, some oocysts had a micropyle but others did not. No other details were given. It appears that there was a mix up with other feces sent by Iwanoff because E. peruviana has not been found subsequently. Because there are no archived specimens, this question cannot be resolved retrospectively. I consider it nomen nudum/species enquirende.
As per Guerrero (1967a), Eimeria infections were reported in alpacas in Peru by Arnao (1951), Chávez (1959), Chávez and Guerrero (1960), Chávez (1965), and Vásquez et al. (1965); these papers were published in local journals or in conference proceedings and are no longer available because the files have been discarded (personal communication from Dr. Guillermo Leguía to me, January 10, 2018). As per Guerrero (1967a), Arnao (1951) first reported Eimeria sp. in feces of alpacas, and Chávez (1959) found Eimeria oocysts in 17% of 2109 fecal samples. Chávez and Guerrero (1960) found Eimeria in the intestine of an alpaca and in feces of 14% of 300 alpacas (Chávez and Guerrero 1960). Vásquez et al. (1965) reported Eimeria oocysts in the intestine of llamas in Peru.
Carlos Antonio Guerrero (1967a, b) from Peru came to the University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA, and under the supervision of Professor Norman D. Levine, formally described and named the three species of Eimeria, E. alpacae, E. punoensis, and E. lamae. The samples had been collected from the rectum of 12 alpacas from an alpaca farm in Peru, mixed with 2.5% potassium dichromate or 10% formalin and sent to USA. Apparently, most oocysts had sporulated during transit thus, in the original published paper there was no description of unsporulated oocysts (Guerrero 1967b). However, unsporulated oocysts of E. alpacae and E. punoensis (but not E. lamae) were described in his thesis (Guerrero 1967a). After completing his graduate studies, Guerrero returned to Peru and together with Hernandez and Alva reported severe coccidiosis in a 5-month-old alpaca; the alpaca was in poor nutritional condition and had died a day before necropsy (Guerrero et al. 1967). It had mixed infection of E. lamae, E. alpacae, E. punoensis, and an unnamed Eimeria species. They also reported schizonts, gamonts, and oocysts in histological sections; the stages found were arbitrarily assigned to four species of Eimeria. Four years later, Guerrero et al. (1971) described and named Eimeria macusaniensis.
Guerrero et al. (1970b) also first reported on experimental infection of E. lamae in alpaca. Two alpacas were fed 100 oocysts (6 months-old alpaca #1) or 100,000 oocysts (4 months old alpaca #2). Both excreted E. lamae oocysts 10 days (alpaca #2) or 16 days (alpaca #1) later. Alpaca #2 developed diarrhea and died day 15 post inoculation (p.i.). Small schizonts (not illustrated) were found in the duodenum, and numerous gamonts and oocysts were found throughout the small intestine at necropsy.
Three decades later, Leguia and Casas (1998) described the fifth species of Eimeria, E. ivitaensis (Table 1).
Prevalence of Eimeria species oocysts in feces
Prevalence data in llamas (Table 2), alpacas (Table 3), guanacos (Table 4) and vicuñas (Table 5) indicate these camelids are commonly infected with Eimeria species. The data from North America and South America camelids are grouped together but the patterns of infections might be different in these continents. In general, E. lamae was the most prevalent and E. ivitaensis was the least prevalent. Infections were most common in nursing animals. Up to 90% of cria under 2 months of age were found infected (Guerrero et al. 1971). It is noteworthy, that despite excretion of as many as 411,600 oocysts per gram of feces (opg), all vicuñas were asymptomatic (Cafrune et al. 2014).
Table 2.
Country, region | No. tested | No. positive (%) | Eimeria species | Remarks | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Cafrune et al. (2009) | ||||
Jujuy | 478 | 233 (48.7) | E. macusaniensis in all, mixed with E. ivitaensis in 2 | 1 llama with mixed E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis had diarrhea | |
Salta | 48 | 17 (35.4) | E. macusaniensis in 17 | ||
Catamarca | 100 | 65 (65) | E. macusaniensis in all, mixed with E. ivitaensis in 2 | ||
Switzerland | 293 from 38 farms | (68) | E. macusaniensis | Only herd prevalence stated. | Hertzberg and Kohler (2006) |
USA | Rickard and Bishop (1988) | ||||
Oregon | 189 adults | 69 (37) | E. alpacae (27%), E. macusaniensis (1%) E. punoensis (17%), E. lamae (9%), | 1 species in 58%, 2 species in 38%, 3 species in 4% in adults. | |
50 crias | 30 (60) | E. alpacae (52%), E. macusaniensis 0, E. punoensis (40%), E. lamae (32%), | In crias, 47% contained 2 species, 30% had 3 species, 23 % had 1 species. All animals were healthy. | ||
10 states | 301 | 36 (12) | E. macusaniensis | <1 year 19 of 86 (22.1%), > 1 year 17 of 200 (8.5%) | Jarvinen (1999) |
Colorado and Wyoming | 121 Colorado | 76 (62.8) | E. alpacae 75, E. macusaniensis 0, E. lamae 1 | 4 herds surveyed | Schrey et al. (1991) |
23 Wyoming | 15 (65.2) | E. alpacae 5, E. macusaniensis 2, E. lamae 8, |
Table 3.
Country-region | No. tested | No. positive (%) | Eimeria species % | Remarks | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japan Kanto |
53 | 42 (79.2) |
E. lamae 1.9 E. macusaniensis 7.5 E. punoensis and/or E alpacae 69.8 |
53 of 390 alpacas from 1 farm tested | Hyuga and Matsumoto (2016) |
New Zealand | 460 | 15 (3.2) | E. macusaniensis | 5 farms were surveyed | Rawdon et al. (2006) |
Peru Cuzco |
160 | 67 (58.1) |
E. lamae 60.4, E. punoesis 30.0, E. alpace 45.6 E. macusaniensis 50.4 |
90% of 2 months-old alpacas were positive with an oocyst burden of 1016 oocysts per gram of feces | Guerrero et al. (1970a) |
Southern Peru | 316 | 145 (46.2) | E. macusaniensis 56.5 | 22 herds surveyed | Cordero Ramirez et al. (2011) |
Puno | 478 | 418 (87.5) |
E. lamae 15.6, E. punoesis 20.0, E. alpace 16.9 E. macusaniensis 25 E. ivitaensis 6.2 |
< 90 days old healthy cria, infection with multiple species was common | Rodríguez et al. (2012) |
Puno | 350 | 224 (64.3) |
E. lamae 91, E. macusaniensis 35, E. punoensis 78, E. alpacae 87, E. ivitaensis 13 |
Unweaned alpacas 2 from 23 herds | Díaz et al. (2016) |
Switzerland | 72 | Not stated | E. macusaniensis | Present in 68% of farms, no individual animal data | Hertzberg and Kohler (2006) |
UK | Not stated | Not stated | E. ivitaensis | Present in 2 herds. Zinc sulfate sp. gr. 1.36 used for flotation | Twomey et al. (2010) |
USA-10 states | 115 | 8 (7.0) | E. macusaniensis | Jarvinen (1999) | |
Maryland | 61 | 14 (26.2) | E. alpacae in 7, E. punoensis in 5, mixed in 2 | Two farms. Cesium chlorite sp.gr. 1.4 used for flotation | Trout et al. (2008) |
Table 4.
Country-region | No. tested | No. positive (%) | Eimeria species | Remarks | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argentina Salta |
4 | 1 (25.0) | E. macusaniensis | Semi captive | Cafrune et al. (2009) |
Mendoza, San Juan | 35 | Not stated | E. macusaniensis, Eimeria sp. | Wild guanaco surveyed. Only published as abstract | Borghi et al. (2004) |
Patagonia | 12 | 10 (80.3) | E. macusaniensis in 9, Eimeria spp. in 10 | Mortality due to starvation in wild population. Feces were from animals necropsied | Beldomenico et al. (2003) |
Chile Magallanes |
15 | 6 (40.0) | E. macusaniensis | Semi captive | Correa et al. (2012) |
Peru 9 districts |
132 | 43 (33.3) |
E. punoensis 21.2%, E. alpacae 13.6%, E. lamae 4.5%, E. macusaniensis 15.9% |
Wild population | Castillo et al. (2008) |
USA-10 states | 27 | 2 (7.4) | E. macusaniensis | Jarvinen (1999) |
Table 5.
Country-region | No. tested | No. positive (%) | Eimeria species | Remarks | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argentina Jujuy |
81 juveniles 154 adults |
81 (100.0) 143 (92.8) |
E. punoensis (100%), E. alpacae (85.1%), E. lamae (48.1%), E. macusaniensis (82.7%), and E. ivitaensis. (3.7%) E. punoensis (89.6%), E. alpacae (66.8%), E. lamae (27.2%), E. macusaniensis (15.5%), and E. ivitaensis. (1.2%) |
Born and raised at an experimental station. Prevalences were higher in May versus in November, 2011. All were asymptomatic. Mixed infections were common | Cafrune et al. (2014) |
Bolivia Apolobamba |
25 adults 7 juveniles |
22 (88) 7 (100) |
E. alpacae 88%, E. puneonsis 80.0%, E. lamae 12%, and E. macusaniensis 8% E. alpacae 100%, E. puneonsis 100%, E. lamae 42.9%, and E. macusaniensis 14.3% |
Wild population | Beltrán-Saavedra et al. (2011) |
Peru Pampa Galeras |
39 Adults | 15 (41.0) | E. punoensis/E. lamae | Wild population, opg (<48) | Bouts et al. (2003) |
Clinical infections
Little is known of camelid coccidiosis in the wild (Leguía 1991; Mamani Paredes et al. 2009; Cafrune et al. 2014). However, Eimeria infections can be pathogenic in camelids dependent on age, concurrent infections, environmental conditions, stress of captivity and transportation, and nutrition in general (Díaz et al. 2016). Some of these factors have been investigated.
Reports of clinical coccidiosis in camelids are summarized in Table 6. Except for a report of coccidiosis in a captive guanaco from the USA (Hodgin et al. 1984), all clinical reports were in llamas and alpacas.
Table 6.
Country | Host | Eimeria spp. | Main findings | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Australia | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis | A 10-year-old alpaca died suddenly without prior clinical signs. Severe, necrotic enteritis with massive parasitization of small intestine. No evidence for clostridial or other toxins. Oocysts in feces were 80–82 × 50–52 μm and sporocysts were 34 × 18 μm | Lenghaus et al. (2004) |
Germany | Llama | E. macusaniensis | Thirteen of 16 one to three year-old llamas developed diarrhea and died within 2 months after a long distance travel from northern Germany to Bavaria. Enteritis associated with E. macusaniensis was found in three llamas necropsied. | Hänichen et al. (1994) |
New Zealand | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis | A 10-year-old female alpaca diagnosed with histologically confirmed ulcerative coccidial enteritis affecting ileum and rare parasitism in duodenum. Endogenous stages (schizonts, gamonts, oocysts) were present in histological sections. Oocysts were seen antemortem and the alpaca had been treated with an unspecified anticoccidial drug | Rawdon et al. (2006) |
Peru | ||||
Puno | Alpaca | Eimeria spp. | Heavy coccidiosis in a 5-month-old alpaca. Schizonts and gamonts of E. lamae and E. ivitaensis found in histological sections | Guerrero et al. (1967) |
Southern sierra | Alpacas | E. macusaniensis | Twelve 25–35-day-old alpacas that died suddenly (n = 4) and 8 with diarrhea were necropsied and studied histologically. Macroscopic and microscopic lesions were seen in jejunum and ileum. Necrosis, fusion and blunting of villi were associated with schizonts and gamonts, and oocysts | Rosadio and Ameghino (1994) |
IVITA, La Raya, Cusco | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis, E. lamae, E punoensis; E. ivitaensis | Investigations of causes of diarrhea in 48 newborn alpacas found entrotoxemia in 30, collibacillosis in 7, and Eimeria in 11; E. macusaniensis in 4, E. macusaniensis and E. punoensis in 7, and E. lamae in 4. Authors mentioned finding E. macusaniensis stages in small intestine, cecum, and colon. Intracellular stages of E. ivitaensis were reported in crypts of jejunum and ileum for the first time | Palacios et al. (2005) |
Marangani, Cusco | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis; E. ivitaensis | Sudden onset of diarrhea, emaciation, and death in seven 4–5-month-old alpacas from one herd. Enteritis was the main finding. E. macusaniensis stages were found in jejunum, ileum, cecum, and ascending colon whereas E. ivitaensis stages were restricted to jejunum and ileum. Schizonts, gamonts, and oocysts were identified for both species; schizonts of E. ivitaensis caused more damage than schizonts of E. macusaniensis. Microgamonts of both species appeared similar but gamonts were different; the wall forming bodies of E. ivitaensis were small and basophilic whereas those of E. macusaniensis were large and eosinophilic | Palacios et al. (2004,2006) |
Arequipa, Puno, Cusco | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis | Histological evaluation of 108 cases of Clostridium-induced enterotoxemia in 2–8-week-old alpacas revealed (a). E. macusaniensis in 33 (30.5%). (b) massive infection in 3 of 31 alpacas less than 2 weeks old; 2 of these were only 10 days old. (c) infections observed even in well managed herd. (d) severe lesions in jejunum and ileum in crypts | Rosadio et al. (2010) |
Silli, Cusco | Alpaca | Eimeria sp. | Causes of diarrhea in an outbreak involving 50 1- to 5-week-old alpacas were investigated. 80% had Eimeria spp. infections; alone in 19, and in combinations with other agents in 21 alpacas. Illustrations from a 21-day-old alpacas show heavy coccidial infections, different from E. macusaniensis | Rojas et al. (2016) |
UK | Alpaca | Oocysts of E. macusaniensis, E lamae, and E. alpace in feces |
The index case, a 16-month-old alpaca, was found dead with a short period of restlessness. Histologic examination revealed acute, necrotic enteritis with Clostridium perfringens toxemia. Lesions associated E. macusaniensis stages. 54 additional cases of coccidiosis recorded; 40 confirmed, 9 suggestive, and 5 incidental. Most cases were in adults. Of the 26 with established diagnosis, 10 were associated with E. macusaniensis, 7 with E. punoensis, 1 with E. alpacae, 1 with E. lamae; mixed Eimeria spp. in 7. |
Schock et al. (2007) |
USA | ||||
Michigan | Guanaco | E. macusaniensis | 3-month-old female guanaco from Detroit Zoological Park died of acute illness with leptospiral nephritis and hepatitis. The animal had abdominal pain. At necropsy a 60 cm section of jejunum was congested. Histologically, it had subacute enteritis with gamonts and oocysts of E. macusaniensis; feces were not available for oocyst identification. | Hodgin et al. (1984) |
Wyoming | Llama | E. macusaniensis | 3-year-old female llama died after short illness associated with enterotoxemia. Asexual and sexual stages reported in ileum. E. macusaniensis oocysts found in feces | Schrey et al. (1991) |
Missouri | Alpaca or llama not distinguished | Eimeria sp. | 2 alpacas with weight loss and hypoproteinemia. Both had been vaccinated against C. perfrigens. First alpaca 10-year-old diagnosed antemortem with E. macusaniensis based on jejunal biopsy died 5 days despite of treatment with sulfadimethoxine. The alpaca had chronic weight loss. Coccidial stages found in jejunum and ileum. The second animal died after diarrheal episode. Necropsy revealed Eimeria stages in jejunum and ileum but no oocysts in feces | Chigerwe et al. (2007) |
New York | Alpaca | E. macusaniensis | Two-year-old female alpaca with abdominal pain, hypoproteinemia. Ultrasound examination revealed thickened loop of small intestine with collapsed lumen. Histological examination of biopsied small intestinal area revealed severe parasitism with E. macusaniensis stages. The alpaca recovered after sulfadimethoxine treatment. Oocysts of two species of Eimeria were present in feces, predominantly E. punoensis | Johnson et al. (2009) |
Oregon | 15 llamas, 34 alpacas | E. macusaniensis | See text for details | Cebra et al. (2007) |
Illinois | 1 llama | E. macusaniensis | Weight loss. Gametogony described in detail | Dubey (2018) |
Among reports summarized in Table 6, a comprehensive investigation of causes of mortality was performed on 15 llamas, and 34 alpacas submitted to the Oregon Diagnostic Laboratory, Oregon State University hospital during 2002–2006 (Cebra et al. 2007). The following is the most important information from this paper:
E. macusaniensis infections were diagnosed in 49 camelids 3 weeks to 18 years old. The clinical signs were weight loss, lethargy, and diarrhea. Of these, 10 llamas and 9 alpacas were examined at necropsy.
Feces or intestinal contents of 42 camelids were examined by flotation; E. macusaniensis oocysts were not found in 17 but E. macusaniensis-associated enteritis was confirmed histologically. The other Eimeria oocysts identified were: E. lamae and E. alpacae.
Multiple sections of intestines were available for histological examination in 29 of 34 cases of E. macusaniensis. Eimeria macusaniensis lesions were most severe in jejunum and ileum. Meronts, macro and micro-gamonts, and oocysts were reported in histological sections; the identification of species was based on large size of wall-forming bodies in developing gamonts and oocysts found.
Early gamonts, but no mature gamonts, were detected in 13 camelids in whose feces oocysts were not demonstrable.
Most interesting information was obtained from outbreaks of coccidiosis in 15 camelids on four farms. One outbreak occurred in a group of alpacas, 20 days after being introduced to new premises that had been vacant for 6 months. Six additional alpacas became ill within 13 days; four of these died and were necropsied. Eimeria macusaniensis was diagnosed histologically. Eimeria macusaniensis oocysts were detected in feces of five alpacas 37 days after move to the new premises; these alpacas had diarrhea. The resident alpacas moved to the same pasture at the same time remained healthy.
This investigation concluded that E. macusaniensis-associated coccidiosis is common cause of illness in camelids of all ages in Oregon.
Concurrent infections and other causes of mortality
During a retrospective study of 3766 alpacas that had died between 1998 and 2000 in three production centers in Peru, parasitic disease accounted for 3.0%; 51.7% of deaths were attributed to infectious causes (Mamani Paredes et al. 2009). Among the parasitic diseases, coccidiosis was found in 25.4%. Thus, coccidiosis was recognized as cause of mortality only in few alpacas. However, a critical evaluation of etiology was lacking in this investigation.
Neonatal diarrhea is a common problem in raising livestock and diagnosis is problematic because of multiple etiology. Examples of pathogens found in cases of neonatal diarrhea in camelids are shown in Table 7. Despite all referred pathogens that can cause diarrhea, their relative importance is difficult to determine. An unusually severe outbreak of diarrhea was investigated in an alpaca herd in Silli, Cusco, Peru (Table 7). Of 50 affected alpacas, 6 died and 44 were euthanized; all were examined at necropsy (Rojas et al. 2016). Histologically, 44 of 50 alpacas had enteritis and 80% had Eimeria sp. infections. It is uncertain whether the diagnosis of Eimeria infections was based solely on fecal testing or histology. One illustration (Fig. 3 of Rojas et al. 2016) of small intestine shows heavy coccidiosis with small-sized Eimeria but there was no mention of species involved or description of parasitic stages (my attempts to obtain more information about endogenous stages were unsuccessful).
Table 7.
Source | No. | Age (days) |
Year | Percent of samples | Reference | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli | Corona virus | Cryptosp oridium | Giardia | Rota virus | Eimeria | |||||
Oregon, USAa | 45 | 10–210 | 1999–2002 | NS | 42 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 13 | Cebra et al. (2003) |
Ohio, USAb | 59 | 4–120 | 1999–2004 | 0 | 6.9 | 25.9 | 32.8 | 0 | 12.1 | Whitehead and Anderson (2006) |
Puno, Peruc | 48 | newborn | 2002–2003 | 77f | NSe | 4.1 | NS | NS | 31.4g | Palacios et al. (2005) |
Cusco, Perud | 50 | 7–35 | January–February, 2010 | 34 | 40 | 20 | NS | 32 | 80 | Rojas et al. (2016) |
aOregon State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
bVeterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
cFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional Mayer de San Marcos, Lima, Peru
dInstituto Veterinario de Investigaciones Tropicales y de Altura (IVITA), Cuzco, Peru
eNS = not stated
fOf the 37 cases of bacterial infection, 30 were due to enterotoxemia
g4 cases of Eimeria macusaniensis and enterotoxemia, 7 mixed infection with E. macusaniensis and E. punoensis, and 4 cases due to E. lamae
In an enquiry of causes of neonatal deaths in young alpacas (2–4 months old) from three alpaca centers in Peru, histological sections of intestine of 108 alpacas considered to have died from enterotoxemia were examined for evidence of E. macusaniensis infection. Only sections of intestines from grossly visible lesions were examined. Most (n = 103) sections were from the ileum with only five from jejunum. Eimeria macusaniensis developmental stages were detected in 33 alpacas. Of the 31 alpacas with available ages, three were 2 weeks old; two were only 10 days old (Rosadio et al. 2010). These findings indicate that alpacas can become infected on the day of birth because the minimum prepatent period of any camelid Eimeria is 10 days (Table 8).
Table 8.
Host species (no.) | Eimeria species | No. of oocysts | Prepatent period in days | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Llama (4) |
E. alpacae-25%, E. punoensis 75%-both from llama |
10,000–2 llamas, 50,000, 2 llamas | E. alpacae-16-18, E. punoensis-10 | Foreyt and Lagerquist (1992) |
Llama (4) |
E. macusaniensis- Guanaco |
500–5000 | 36–41 | Jarvinen (2008) |
(3) |
E. macusaniensis- Alpaca |
1000 | 33, 34 | |
Llama (6) |
E. macusaniensis- Llama and alpaca |
20,000–100,000 | 32–36 | Rohbeck (2006) |
Alpaca (4) |
E. macusaniensis- Alpaca and llama |
20,000 | 31 or 35 | Cebra et al. (2012) |
aSource of infection is in bold
Coinfection of coccidiosis and enterotoxemia were associated with mortality in newborn alpacas in another report (Palacios et al. 2005, Table 7).
Stress
Housing in close quarters and poor nutrition are some of the complicating factors in coccidiosis. Stress of transportation and change of ownership/location can predispose camelids to coccidiosis. Shows, sales, and movement for breeding, and the management in the new farm can cause stress. In one instance, 30 llamas developed clinical coccidiosis after being transported to a new farm (Cebra et al. 2007). Adult alpacas have developed fatal coccidiosis within 5 weeks after transportation to a new farm (Chigerwe et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009).
Diagnosis
Antemortem
Lethargy, diarrhea, abdominal distention, anorexia, weight loss, constipation, and colic have been reported in camelids with uncomplicated coccidiosis (Costarella and Anderson 1999; Cebra et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009). Coccidiosis should be suspected with these signs in camelids. Additionally, several camelids suffering from coccidiosis died suddenly (Rosadio and Ameghino 1994; Lenghaus et al. 2004; Palacios et al. 2006; Schock et al. 2007). It should be noted that diarrhea is an inconsistent finding, especially in adult camelids (Cebra et al. 2014).
Fecal examination
The detection of oocysts in feces can help diagnosis. Although most coccidian oocysts float in sugar or salt solutions with specific gravity (sp. gr.) of 1.28, E. macusaniensis oocysts are large and heavy and do not float well in these solutions (Cebra and Stang 2008). Solutions of sp. gr. > 1.28 are recommended for floatation of this Eimeria species. Super saturated sugar solution (sp. gr. 1.33, Johnson et al. 2009), saturated zinc sulfate solution (sp.gr. 1.36, Twomey et al. 2010), Cesium chlorite solution (sp. gr. 1.4, Trout et al. 2008) or mixed salt solutions (zinc chloride 105 g, NaCl 20 g, water to 100 ml, sp. gr. 1.59, Cafrune et al. 2009) are some examples of flotation solutions. The sedimentation methods used for trematode ova are as effective as the flotation method (Rohbeck 2006). The number of oocysts detected does not correlate with clinical signs (Foreyt and Lagerquist 1992; Costarella and Anderson 1999; Beldomenico et al. 2003; Cebra et al. 2007; Jarvinen, 2008; Foreyt and Lagerquist 1992; Rohbeck 2006; Cafrune et al. 2014). Some cases of coccidiosis may be missed because of the development of clinical signs before oocysts are excreted in feces (prepatent phase). To alleviate this problem, Cebra et al. (2012) developed a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for E. macusaniensis and E. lamae diagnosis. In experimentally infected alpacas, oocyst DNA was detectible up to 7 days before oocyst detection in feces. The internal transcribed primers (ITS) were species-specific without cross detection of E. macusaniensis and E. lamae. Finding Eimeria oocyst DNA, 7 days before prepatent period is intriguing.
Biopsy and ultrasound examination
Ultrasound examination results revealing local distention and increased thickness of small intestine, particularly of ileum, may provide suggestive diagnosis (Costarella and Anderson 1999; Cebra et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009). Smears made from biopsied material can reveal the parasitic stages (Cebra et al. 2007). However, histological examination is needed to evaluate lesions (Cebra et al. 2007; Chigerwe et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009).
Other laboratory testing results
Hypoproteinemia and hypoalbuminemia are the most consistent finding (Cebra et al. 2007). Hyponatremia is also relatively common, and a rare finding in camelids without some form of enteritis.
Post mortem diagnosis
Gross lesions are most common in ileum, although any region of small intestine, cecum and colon may be affected (Rosadio and Ameghino 1994; Palacios et al. 2006; Cebra et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009). Mucosal thickening, congestion, plaques and severe hemorrhagic enteritis may be seen in primary lesions (Figs. 2 and 3). Secondary bacterial infection can lead to severe necrotic enteritis (Cebra et al. 2007; Schock et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2009; Rosadio et al. 2010). The bowel may also appear grossly normal, even with severe infection.
Microscopically, there is hyperplasia, non-suppurative enteritis, depending on concurrent infections (Figs. 4 and 5). Blunting, fusion, and necrosis of villi, particularly at the tips have been reported (Rosadio and Ameghino 1994; Johnson et al. 2009). Although developmental stages of camelid Eimeria occur in the mucosal epithelium and lamina propria, occasionally Eimeria and associated changes have been noted in the tunica muscularis mucosae (Johnson et al. 2009).
The detection of developing stages of coccidia can establish diagnosis of coccidiosis (Fig. 6). As stated earlier, of the five most prevalent species of Eimeria in camelids, E. macusaniensis has been most commonly identified in lesions. Its oocysts are distinctive, and it has large-sized gamonts (Figs. 4, 5, and 6). Its schizont stage is unknown (Dubey 2018). In few cases, E. ivitaensis has been associated with clinical coccidiosis in alpacas in Peru (Palacios et al. 2006) and the United States (Cebra et al. 2014; Cebra 2015).
Eimeria lamae is another pathogenic species. It is reported to develop in surface epithelium versus in crypts parasitized by E. macusianiensis and E. ivitaensis (Guerrero et al. 1967); I have not found description of endogenous stages.
Experimental infections
In addition to experimental infections of two alpacas in Peru by Guerrero et al. (1970a) already discussed, results of four other experiments are summarized in Table 8. Main observations from experiments in Table 8 are:
Minimum prepatent periods were: 31 days for E. macusaniensis, 16 days for E. lamae, and 10 days for E. punoensis (Table 8).
Inoculated camelids generally remained asymptomatic despite excreting as many as 10,305 opg; peak oocyst excretion for E. lamae, and E. punoensis was during the second week of inoculation (Foreyt and Lagerquist 1992). However, 2 of 5 llama crias fed 20,000 E. macusaniensis oocysts had pulpy or watery or bloody diarrhea 3–10 or 9–16 days p.i. (Rohbeck 2006).
Eimeria macusaniensis was cross transmissible between guanaco, alpaca, and llama.
Eimeria macusaniensis oocysts survived for 84 months, the longest period of any known Eimeria species (Jarvinen 2008).
Eimeria macusaniensis was mildly immunogenic because llamas excreted E. macusaniensis oocysts after reinoculation; in challenged llamas the prepatent period was longer (37–40 days versus 32–36 days after primary infection), patency was shorter (39–43 days versus 20–23 days after challenge) and fewer oocysts were excreted after challenge) (Rohbeck 2006).
Treatment
There are no anti-coccidial drugs approved specifically for camelids. Benzene acetonitrile compounds (ponazuril, diclazuril, toltrazuril), sulfonamides, and amprolium have been used to treat or prevent coccidiosis in camelids (Cebra et al. 2007, 2014; Ballweber 2009; Thomas and Morgan 2013; Franz et al. 2015).
Efficacy of various drugs for treating clinical coccidiosis is unknown. None of anticoccidials have any measurable effect on late stages of gamonts and oocysts that have been commonly related with clinical coccidiosis associated with E. macusaniensis and E. ivitaensis.
Treatment for coccidiosis included amprolium hydrochloride (10 mg/kg) in a 1.5% solution orally daily up to 15 days, or sulfadimethoxine (110 mg/kg) orally daily for 10 days, and supportive therapy. However, some camelids died despite this therapy and had confirmed coccidiosis histologically (Cebra et al. 2007). In one instance, an entire herd of 30 alpacas that developed coccidiosis 20 days after introduction to a new farm was treated with amprolium hydrochloride, two died and four were euthanized. Two of the four that died had histologically confirmed coccidiosis (Cebra et al. 2007).
The benzene acetonitrile compounds in general have low toxicity. They are used extensively to treat coccidiosis in camelids in countries where they are readily available in a convenient treatment form.
Prophylactic treatment should be considered during winter when outbreaks of coccidiosis are common. Decoquinate may be added to feed at 0.5 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks (Cebra et al. 2014).
In summary, therapeutic treatment for coccidiosis in South camelids needs validation.
Conclusion and prospective
It is evident from the above review that coccidiosis can be serious in captive camelids. Under free range/wild environment in South America, camelids can excrete numerous oocysts in feces without showing clinical signs. The pathogenesis of fatal coccidiosis is not fully understood, because even adult camelids can die suddenly, and animals can develop clinical signs long before oocysts are detected in feces. Whether there are differences in biology of Eimeria species in camelids in North America and South America needs further investigation. Among the five valid species of South American camelid Eimeria, E. macusaniensis appears to be most pathogenic. Only gamonts and oocysts have been confirmed in histological sections of intestines in cases associated with E. macusaniensis. There is need to investigate unknown endogenous stages of camelid coccidia. It appears that heavy parasitization of E. macusaniensis in crypts of ileum predisposes camelids to other enteric pathogens, particularly Clostridium perfrigens toxemia. There are no anticoccidial drugs specifically approved for use in camelids.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Drs. R.J. Bildfell, C. Bauer, M. M. Cafrune, C. K. Cebra, A. Daugschies, P. Diaz, G. Leguía, G. A. Perkins, and R. H. Rosadio who supplied specimens and advice. I also thank Camilla Cezar, Fernando Murata, Oliver Kwok, Andressa Ferreira da Silva, and Shiv Kumar Verma in my laboratory for assistance in preparation of this review.
References
*cited by Guerrero (1967a,b)
- *Arnao M (1951) Parásitos identificados en el Instituto Nacional de Biología Animal. Rev Int Nac Biol Ani, Lima 2:78–80
- Ballweber LR. Ecto- and endoparasites of new world camelids. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract. 2009;25:295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beldomenico PM, Uhart M, Bono MF, Marull C, Baldi R, Peralta JL. Internal parasites of free-ranging guanacos from Patagonia. Vet Parasitol. 2003;118:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beltrán-Saavedra LF, Nallar-Gutiérrez R, Ayala G, Limachi JM, Gonzalez-Rojas JL. Estudio sanitario de vicuñas en silvestría del Área Natural de Manejo Integrado Nacional Apolobamba, Bolivia. Ecol Bolivia. 2011;46:14–27. [Google Scholar]
- Borghi ED, Araoz C, Jofré C, Duarte A, Mera y Sierra RL. Gastrointestinal parasites of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) of Midwest Argentina (Mendoza and San Juan) Biocell. 2004;28:185. [Google Scholar]
- Bouts T, Fox MT, Scheres G, Chávez A (2003) Identification of gastrointestinal nematodes and coccidia in wild vicunas (Lama vicugna) in Pampa Galeras, Peru. In: Erkrankungen der Zootiere: Verhandlungsbericht des 41 Internationalen Symposiums uber die Erkrankungen der Zoo- und Wildtiere, Rome, Italy, 28 May - 1 June, pp 101–105. Symposiums
- Cafrune MM, Marín RE, Rigalt FA, Romero SR, Aguirre DH. Prevalence of Eimeria macusaniensis and Eimeria ivitaensis in South American camelids of Northwest Argentina. Vet Parasitol. 2009;162:338–341. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cafrune MM, Romero SR, Aguirre DH (2014) Prevalence and abundance of Eimeria spp. infection in captive vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna) from the Argentinean Andean Altiplano. Small Rumin Res 120:150–154
- Castillo DH, Chávez VA, Hoces RD, Casas AE, Rosadio AR, Wheeler JC. Contribución al estudio del parasitismo gastrointestinal en guanacos (Lama guanicoe cacsilensis) Rev Inv Vet Perú. 2008;19:168–175. [Google Scholar]
- Cebra CK (2015) North American experience with coccidiosis in New World camelids. Proc. VII Congresso Mundal en camélidos. Sudamericanos. Puno-Peru 2015. 5 pages. Published by Universidad Nacional del Altiplano
- Cebra CK, Stang BV. Comparison of methods to detect gastrointestinal parasites in llamas and alpacas. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:733–741. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.5.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebra CK, Mattson DE, Baker RJ, Sonn RJ, Dearing PL. Potential pathogens in feces from unweaned llamas and alpacas with diarrhea. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223:1806–1808. doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.1806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebra CK, Valentine BA, Schlipf JW, Bildfell RJ, McKenzie E, Waitt LH, Heidel JR, Cooper BJ, Löhr CV, Bird KE, Saulez MN, Firshman AM. Eimeria macusaniensis infection in 15 llamas and 34 alpacas. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;230:94–100. doi: 10.2460/javma.230.1.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebra CK, Stang BV, Smith CC. Development of a nested polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Eimeria macusaniensis in camelid feces. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73:13–18. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cebra CK, Anderson D, Tibary A, Van Saun R, Johnson LW. Llama and Alpaca Care, Medicine, Surgery, Reproduction, Nutrition, and Health Care. 1. Saint Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2014. Parasitic gastroenteritis; pp. 501–512. [Google Scholar]
- *Chávez CE (1959) Enfermedades parasitarias de las alpacas. An Primer Ciclo Conf Med Vet Lima
- *Chávez CE (1965) Parasites and parasitic diseases of Lama pacos (alpacas) in Perú. Univ. San Marcos, Lima
- *Chávez CE, Guerrero CA (1960) Parásitos de alpacas. An Primer Cong Nac Med Vet Lima 40–41
- Chigerwe M, Middleton JR, Williams F, Tyler JW, Kreeger JM. Atypical coccidiosis in South American camelids. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2007;19:122–125. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cordero Ramirez A, Huanca López W, Díaz Fernández P, López Sández CM, Panadero Fontán R, Fernández Rodriguez G, Lago N, Morrondo Pelayo P, Díez Baños P (2011) Infection by gastrointestinal parasites in alpacas (Lama pacos) from Southern Perú. XII Congresso Ibérico Parasitología. Zaragoza 5-8 July 2011
- Correa L, Zapata B, Soto-Gamboa M. Gastrointestinal and blood parasite determination in the guanaco (Lama guanicoe) under semi-captivity conditions. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;44:11–15. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9891-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costarella CE, Anderson DE. Ileocecocolic intussusception in a one-month-old llama. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;214:1672–1673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Souza MV, da Silva LGR, Silva-Pinto V, Mendez-Quiros P, Chaves SAM, Iñiguez AM. New paleoparasitological investigations from the pre-Inca to Hispanic contact period in northern Chile. Acta Trop. 2018;178:290–296. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Díaz P, Panadero R, López R, Cordero A, Pérez-Creo A, López CM, Fernandez G, Díez-Baños P, Morrondo P. Prevalence and risk factors associated to Eimeria spp. infection in unweaned alpacas (Vicugna pacos) from southern Peru. Acta Parasitol. 2016;61:74–78. doi: 10.1515/ap-2016-0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dubey JP (2018) Gametogony of Eimeria macusaniensis Guerrero, Hernandez, Bazalar and Alba, 1971 in llama (Lama glama). Parasitology in press: 10.1017/S0031182018000483 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Foreyt WJ, Lagerquist J. Experimental infections of Eimeria alpacae and Eimeria punoensis in llamas (Lama glama) J Parasitol. 1992;78:906–909. doi: 10.2307/3283327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franz S, Wittek T, Joachim A, Hinney B, Dadak AM. Llamas and alpacas in Europe: Endoparasites of the digestive tract and their pharmacotherapeutic control. Vet J. 2015;204:255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fugassa MH, Sardella NH, Taglioretti V, Reinhard KJ, Araújo A. Eimeriid oocysts from archaeological samples in Patagonia, Argentina. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1418–1420. doi: 10.1645/GE-1537.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fugassa MH, Beltrame MO, Sardella NH, Civalero MT, Aschero C. Paleoparasitological results from coprolites dated at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition as source of paleoecological evidence in Patagonia. J Arch Sci. 2010;37:880–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero CA (1967a) Coccidia (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) of the alpaca (Lama pacos). Master’s thesis. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, pp 1–49 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Guerrero CA. Coccidia (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) of the alpaca Lama pacos. J Protozool. 1967;14:613–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1967.tb02050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero CA, Hernandez DJ, Alva MJ. Coccidiosis en alpacas. Rev Méd Vét. 1967;21:59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero CA, Alva J, Leguía G, Bazalar H. Prevalencia de coccidias (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) en alpacas, Lama pacos. Boletén Exptraordinario Instituto Veterinario de Investigaciones Tropicales y Altura. 1970;4:84–90. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero CA, Alva J, Bazalar H, Tabacchi L. Infección experimental de alpacas con Eimeria lamae. Boletin Exptraordinario Instituto Veterinario de Investigaciones Tropicales y Altura. 1970;4:79–83. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero CA, Hernandez J, Bazalar H, Alva J (1971) Eimeria macusaniensis n. sp. (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) of the alpaca Lama pacos. J Protozool 18:162–163 [DOI] [PubMed]
- Hänichen T, Wiesner H, Göbel E (1994): Zur Pathologie, Diagnostik und Therapie der Kokzidiose bei Wiederkaeuern im Zoo. Verhandlungsber. Erkr. Zootiere 36: 375–380
- Hertzberg H, Kohler L. Prevalence and significance of gastrointestinal helminths and protozoa in south American camelids in Switzerland. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wochenschr. 2006;119:291–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgin C, Schillhorn van Veen TW, Fayer R, Richter N. Leptospirosis and coccidial infection in a guanaco. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984;185:1442–1444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyuga A, Matsumoto J. A survey of gastrointestinal parasites of alpacas (Vicugna pacos) raised in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2016;78:719–721. doi: 10.1292/jvms.15-0546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvinen JA. Prevalence of Eimeria macusaniensis (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) in midwestern Lama spp. J Parasitol. 1999;85:373–376. doi: 10.2307/3285651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvinen JA. Infection of llamas with stored Eimeria macusaniensis oocysts obtained from guanaco and alpaca feces. J Parasitol. 2008;94:969–972. doi: 10.1645/GE-1408.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson AL, Stewart JE, Perkins GA. Diagnosis and treatment of Eimeria macusaniensis in an adult alpaca with signs of colic. Vet J. 2009;179:465–467. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leguía G. The epidemiology and economic impact of llama parasites. Parasitol Today. 1991;7:54–56. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(91)90190-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leguia PG, Casas AE. Eimeria ivitaensis n. sp (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) en alpacas (Lama pacos) Revista Peruana de Parasitologia. 1998;13:59–61. [Google Scholar]
- Lenghaus C, O'Callaghan MG, Rogers C. Coccidiosis and sudden death in an adult alpaca (Lama pacos) Aust Vet J. 2004;82:711–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2004.tb12166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levine ND. Protozoan parasites of domestic animals and of man. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company; 1973. pp. 1–406. [Google Scholar]
- Mamani Paredes J, Condemayta Condemayta Z, Calle Charaja L (2009) Causas de mortalidad de alpacas en tres principales centros de producción ubicados en puna seca y humeda del departamento de Puno. Revista electrónica de Veterinaria 10: http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n080809/080904.pdf-
- Martinson E, Reinhard KJ, Buikstra JE, de la Cruz KD. Pathoecology of Chiribaya parasitism. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:195–205. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762003000900029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palacios EC, Tabacchi NL, Chavera CA, López UT, Santillán AG, Sandoval ChN, Pezo CD, Perales CR (2004) Eimeriosis en crías de alpacas: estudio anátomo histopatológico Rev Inv Vet Perú 15:174–178
- Palacios EC, Perales CR, Chavera CA, López UT. Caracterización anátomo-histopatológica de enteropatías causantes de mortalidad en crías de alpaca. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 2005;16:34–40. [Google Scholar]
- Palacios CA, Perales RA, Chavera AE, Lopez MT, Braga WU, Moro M. Eimeria macusaniensis and Eimeria ivitaensis co-infection in fatal cases of diarrhoea in young alpacas (Lama pacos) in Peru. Vet Rec. 2006;158:344–345. doi: 10.1136/vr.158.10.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawdon T, McFadden A, King C, Mitchell V, Howell M. Clinical findings and risk factors associated with the first report of Eimeria macusaniensis in New Zealand alpacas. Theatr Surv. 2006;33:11–15. [Google Scholar]
- Rickard LG, Bishop JK. Prevalence of Eimeria spp. (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) in Oregon llamas. J Protozool. 1988;35:335–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1988.tb04101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez HA, Casas AE, Luna EL, Gavidia ChC, Zanabria HV, Rosadio AR (2012) Eimeriosis en crías de alpacas: prevalencia y factores de riesgo Rev Inv Vet Perú 23:289–298
- Rohbeck S (2006) Parasitosen des Verdauungstrakts und der Atemwege bei Neuweltkameliden: Untersuchungen zu ihrer Epidemiologie und Bekämpfung in einer südhessischen Herde sowie zur Biologie von Eimeria macusaniensis. Justus Liebig University Giessen. Dr. med vet thesis, pp 1–131
- Rojas M, Manchego A, Rocha CB, Fornells LA, Silva RC, Mendes GS, Dias HG, Sandoval N, Pezo D, Santos N. Outbreak of diarrhea among preweaning alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in the southern Peruvian highland. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10:269–274. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosadio RH, Ameghino EF. Coccidial infections in neonatal Peruvian alpacas. Vet Rec. 1994;135:459–460. doi: 10.1136/vr.135.19.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosadio R, Londoñe P, Pérez D, Castillo H, Véliz A, Llanco L, Yaya K, Maturrano L. Eimeria macusaniensis associated lesions in neonate alpacas dying from enterotoxemia. Vet Parasitol. 2010;168:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schock A, Bidewell CA, Duff JP, Scholes SF, Higgins RJ. Coccidiosis in British alpacas (Vicugna pacos) Vet Rec. 2007;160:805–806. doi: 10.1136/vr.160.23.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrey CF, Abbott TA, Stewart VA, Marquardt WC. Coccidia of the llama, Lama glama, in Colorado and Wyoming. Vet Parasitol. 1991;40:21–28. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(91)90080-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taglioretti V, Sardella NH, Fugassa MH. Morphometric analysis of modern faeces as a tool to identify artiodactyls’ coprolites. Quat Int. 2014;352:64–67. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2013.12.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taglioretti V, Fugassa MH, Sardella NH. Parasitic diversity found in coprolites of camelids during the Holocene. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:2459–2464. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4442-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas SM, Morgan ER. Effect on performance of weanling alpacas following treatments against gastro-intestinal parasites. Vet Parasitol. 2013;198:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trout JM, Santín M, Fayer R. Detection of assemblage A, Giardia duodenalis and Eimeria spp. in alpacas on two Maryland farms. Vet Parasitol. 2008;153:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Twomey DF, Allen K, Bell S, Evans C, Thomas S. Eimeria ivitaensis in British alpacas. Vet Rec. 2010;167:797–798. doi: 10.1136/vr.c6398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *Vásquez M, Marchinares C, Rojas J (1965) Relación de Enfermediades Parasitarias y Parásitos Identificados en las Diferentes Regiones del Perú (de Noviembre de 1960 a Diciembre de 1963). Ministerio de Agricultura S. I. P. A
- Velázquez NJ, Burry LS, Fugassa MH, Civalero MT, Aschero CA. Palynological analysis of camelid coprolites: seasonality in the use of the site Cerro Casa de Piedra 7 (Santa Cruz, Argentina) Quat Sci Rev. 2014;83:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Whitehead CE, Anderson DE. Neonatal diarrhea in llamas and alpacas. Small Rumin Res. 2006;61:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yakimoff WL. Two new species of Coccidia: Eimeria triffitt n. sp. of the eland (Orias canna), and Eimeria peruviana n. sp. of the llama (Lama glama) Parasitology. 1934;26:510–511. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000023829. [DOI] [Google Scholar]