Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2008;120(15):486–492. doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-1011-8

Needlestick injuries among health care workers: Occupational hazard or avoidable hazard?

Nadelstichverletzungen bei Mitarbeitern im Gesundheitswesen: Berufsrisiko oder vermeidbare Gefährdung?

Sabine Wicker 1,2,✉, Ann-Marie Ludwig 2, René Gottschalk 2, Holger F Rabenau 2
PMCID: PMC7088025  PMID: 18820853

Summary

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the mechanisms and preventability of occupational percutaneous blood exposure of healthcare workers through needlestick injuries and to discuss rational strategies for prevention. METHODS: To calculate the preventability, we surveyed in a first step the number and kind of needlestick injuries and in a second step the reasons for the injuries and the working conditions of the healthcare workers. Both data sets were collected in independent anonymous questionnaire covering occupational blood exposure among healthcare workers in a German university hospital. RESULTS: Needlestick injuries were caused through unsafe procedures, difficult working conditions and unsafe devices. On average, 50.3% (n = 492/978) of all needlestick injuries could have been avoided by the use of safety devices, whereas only 15.2% could have been prevented by organizational measures. In our study, 31.5% (n = 503/1598) of participant healthcare workers had sustained at least one needlestick injury in the past twelve months. The rate of underreporting was about 75%. After introduction of safety devices, 91.8% of the healthcare workers reported being satisfied with the anti-needlestick devices and 83.4% believed that safety devices would increase the safety of the work environment. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposure to blood is a common problem among healthcare workers. The introduction of safety devises is one of the main starting points for avoidance of needlestick injuries, and acceptance among healthcare workers is high. Further targets for preventive measures, such as training in safe working routines, are necessary for improvement of safe work conditions.

Keywords: Bloodborne viruses, Occupational infections, Safety devices

References

  1. Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:482–490. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Driscoll T, Takala J, Steenland K, Corvalan C, Fingerhut M. Review of estimates of the global burden of injury and illness due to occupational exposures. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:491–502. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sepkowitz KA, Eisenberg L. Occupational deaths among healthcare workers. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2005;11:1003–1008. doi: 10.3201/eid1107.041038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Serious adverse events attributed to nevirapine regimes for postexposure prophylaxis after HIV exposure – worldwide, 1997–2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;49:1153–1156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Technical Rule 250 Biological agents in health care and welfare facilities (Article in German) BArbBL. 2003;11:53–73. [Google Scholar]
  6. US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 29 CFR Part Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; needlestick and other sharp injuries; final rule. Fed Regist. 1910;66:1030–5325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cullen BL, Genasi F, Symington I, Bagg J, McCreaddic M, Taylor A, et al. Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63:445–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shah SM, Merchant AT, Dosman JA. Percutaneous injuries among dental professionals in Washington State. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sulsky SI, Birk T, Cohen LC, Luippold RS, Heidenreich MJ, Nunes A (2006) Effectiveness of measures to prevent needlestick injuries among employees in health professions. ENVIRON International Corporation, Health Science Institute
  10. Wicker S, Jung J, Allwinn R, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Prevalence and prevention of needlestick injuries among health care workers in a German university hospital. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81:347–354. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0219-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith DR, Wei N, Zhang YJ, Wang RS. Needlestick and sharps injuries among a cross-section of physicians in Mainland China. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:169–174. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pellissier G, Miguéres B, Tarantola A, Abiteboul D, Lolom I, Bouvet E, et al. Risk of needlestick injuries by injection pens. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Trim JC, Elliot TS. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect. 2003;53:237–242. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wicker S, Allwinn R, Gottschalk R, Rabenau HF. Prevalence of needlestick injuries in a German university hospital: a comparison of two independent data analysis (Article in German) Zentralbl Arbeitsmed, Arbeitssch Ergonomie. 2007;57:42–49. [Google Scholar]
  15. Panlilio AL, Orelien JG, Srivastava MS, Bernardo J, Catalaro MT, Mendelson MH, et al. Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries among hospital-based healthcare workers in the United States, 1997–1998. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:556–562. doi: 10.1086/502439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jovic-Vranes A, Jankovic S, Vranes B. Safety practice and professional exposure to blood and blood-containing materials in Serbian health care workers. J Occup Health. 2006;48:377–382. doi: 10.1539/joh.48.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Haiduven DJ, Simpkins SM, Phillips ES, Stevens DA. A survey of percutaneous/mucocutaneous injury reporting in a public teaching hospital. J Hosp Infect. 1999;41:151–154. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(99)90053-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kralj N, Wittmann A, Hofmann F. Optimised prophylaxis of blood-borne infections during surgery with double gloving systems (Article in German) Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. 2004;39:472–476. [Google Scholar]
  19. Müller-Barthelm R, Buchholz L, Nübling M, Häberle E. Quality control of devices with needle protection technology (Article in German) Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. 2006;41:210–217. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hofmann F, Kralj N, Beie M. Needlestick injuries in health care – frequency, causes and preventive strategies (Article in German) Gesundheitswesen. 2002;64:259–266. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-28353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clarke SP, Schubert M, Korner T. Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:473–478. doi: 10.1086/513445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) Needlestick injuries involving winged steel needles. CDC US Department of Health and Human Services
  23. Vaughn TE, McCoy KD, Beekmann SE, Woolson RF, Torner JC, Doebbeling BN. Factors promoting consistent adherence to safe needle precautions among hospital workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:548–555. doi: 10.1086/502438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Trinkoff AM, Rong L, Geiger-Brown J, Lipscomb J (2007) Work schedule, needle use, and needlestick injuries among registered nurses. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 28: No.2; doi: 10.1086/510785 [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Ayas NT, Barger LK, Cade BE, Hashimoto DM, Rosner B, Cronin JW, et al. Extended work duration and the risk of self-reported percutaneous injuries in interns. JAMA. 2006;296:1055–1062. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fisman DN, Harris AD, Rubin M, Sorock GS, Mittleman MA. Fatigue increases the risk of injury from sharp devices in medical trainees: results from a case-crossover study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:10–17. doi: 10.1086/510569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES