Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2003;48(12):1175–1178. doi: 10.1007/BF03183930

Phylogeny of SARS-CoV as inferred from complete genome comparison

Zhen Qi 1, Yu Hu 2, Wei Li 1,3, Yanjun Chen 1, Zhihua Zhang 1, Shiwei Sun 2, Hongchao Lu 2, Jingfen Zhang 2, Dongbo Bu 2, Lunjiang Ling 1, Runsheng Chen 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC7089017  PMID: 32214702

Abstract

SARS-CoV, as the pathogeny of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), is a mystery that the origin of the virus is still unknown even a few isolates of the virus were completely sequenced. To explore the genesis of SARS-CoV, the FDOD method previously developed by us was applied to comparing complete genomes from 12 SARS-CoV isolates to those from 12 previously identified coronaviruses and an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed. Our results show that all SARS-CoV isolates were clustered into a clique and previously identified coronaviruses formed the other clique. Meanwhile, the three groups of coronaviruses depart from each other clearly in our tree that is consistent with the results of prevenient papers. Differently, from the topology of the phylogenetic tree we found that SARS-CoV is more close to group 1 within genus coronavirus. The topology map also shows that the 12 SARS-CoV isolates may be divided into two groups determined by the association with the SARS-CoV from the Hotel M in Hong Kong that may give some information about the infectious relationship of the SARS.

Keywords: SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV), coronavirus, phylogeny, infection relationship, function of degree of disagreement (FDOD)

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work

References

  • 1.Marra M. A., Jones S. J., Astell C. R., et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science. 2003;300(5624):1399–1404. doi: 10.1126/science.1085953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rota P. A., Oberste M. S., Monroe Stephan S., et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science. 2003;300(5624):1394–1399. doi: 10.1126/science.1085952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruan Y. J., Wei C. L., Ee L. A., et al. Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 S ARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection. Lancet. 2003;361(9371):1779–1785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13414-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qin E. D., Zhu Q. Y., Wang J., et al. A complete sequence and comparative analysis of a SARS-associated virus (Isolate BJ01) Chinese Science Bulletin. 2003;48(10):941–948. doi: 10.1360/03wc0186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Enjuanes L., Brian D., Cavanagh D., et al. Coronaviridae, in Virus Taxonomy. In: van Regenmortel M. H. V., Fauquet C. M., Bishop D. H. L., et al., editors. Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. New York: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 835–849. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lai M. M. C., Holmes K. V. Coronavmidae: The viruses and their replication. In: Knipe D.M., Howley P. M., editors. in Fields Virology. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. pp. 1163–1163. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bush R. M., Smith C. B., Cox N. J., et al. Effects of passage history and sampling bias on phylogenetic reconstruction of human influenza A evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;7:6974–6980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.6974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fang W. W. The characterization of a measure of information discrepancy. Information Sciences. 2000;125:207–232. doi: 10.1016/S0020-0255(00)00008-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li W., Fang W. W., Ling L. J., et al. Phylogeny based on whole genome as inferred from complete information set analysis. Journal of Biological Physics. 2002;28(3):439–449. doi: 10.1023/A:1020316706928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu C. F. J. Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling plans in regression analysis. Annals of Statistics. 1986;14:1261–1295. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An emprical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993;42:182–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.John G., Rob D., Ward W. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of systematic data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1993;2:152–157. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1993.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ward W., John G., Rob D. Elision: a method for accommodating multiple molecular sequence alignments with alignmentambiguous sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1995;4:1–9. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1995.1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ksiazek T. G., Erdman D., Goldsmith C., et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348(20):1953–1966. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rannala B., Huelsenbeck J. P., Yang Z., et al. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 1998;47:702–710. doi: 10.1080/106351598260680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Science Bulletin = Kexue Tongbao are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES