Skip to main content
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2020 Mar 12;2020:4275194. doi: 10.1155/2020/4275194

Reactive Carbonyls Induce TOR- and Carbohydrate-Dependent Hormetic Response in Yeast

Halyna Semchyshyn 1,
PMCID: PMC7091552  PMID: 32231465

Abstract

The induction of the beneficial and detrimental effects by reactive carbonyl species in yeast has been investigated. In this study, we have presented evidence that glyoxal and methylglyoxal at low concentrations were able to induce a hormetic adaptive response in glucose-grown but not fructose-grown yeast. The hormetic effect was also TOR-dependent. The mutation in genes encoding either TOR1 or TOR2 protein makes yeast highly sensitive to both α-dicarbonyls studied. Simultaneous disruption of TOR1 and TOR2 resulted in higher yeast sensitivity to the α-dicarbonyls as compared to parental cells, but double mutant survived better under carbonyl stress than its single mutant counterparts. The data obtained are consistent with the previous works which reported high toxicity of the α-dicarbonyls and extend them with the report on the beneficial TOR-dependent hormetic effect of glyoxal and methylglyoxal.

1. Introduction

A large family of highly reactive organic molecules of short or intermediate length (3–9 carbons) containing at least one carbonyl group are referred to as reactive carbonyl species (RCS). Reactive carbonyls can be of both exogenous and endogenous origin. Some products of organic-pharmaceutical chemistry, industrial pollutants, cigarette smoke, food additives, and components of browned food are widespread exogenous RCS that can easily enter a cell [13]. Endogenously, the generation of RCS is associated with normal metabolic processes, particularly enzymatic and nonenzymatic reactions of carbohydrates and lipids [4, 5]. Both exogenous and endogenous reactive carbonyls demonstrate a large variety of effects and may have a dual biological impact; however, mainly they are known for their harmful influence [6]. Either derived from the environment or endogenously produced reactive carbonyls appear to be toxic because of their ability to modify structure/function of biomolecules and promote the formation of poorly degraded adducts or crosslinks collectively referred to as advanced glycation end products. In most cases studied, the level of RCS and glycation products substantially increases with aging, may disturb cellular metabolism, and accelerate pathological processes [3, 7].

On the other hand, the beneficial role of RCS is also known. Some of the reactive carbonyls are implicated in immune response, cellular signaling, and regulation of gene expression. Showing anticancer, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities, certain RCS are suggested to be promising as potential therapeutic agents [8, 9]. Increasing evidence indicates that different reactive species (e.g., oxygen-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-containing molecules) trigger hormetic response [10, 11]; however, possible involvement of RCS has not been intensively investigated. It is clear from many studies that RCS can modulate cell signaling pathways, including the stress responses, proapoptotic processes, enzyme activities, and transcription factor functions in different experimental models [9, 1215].

The target of rapamycin (TOR) is a highly conserved signaling pathway that is involved in a cell response to various extracellular and intracellular stimuli [16, 17]. Obviously, advanced glycation end products modulate/regulate many metabolic, physiological, and pathological events through the TOR network [7]. However, the interplay between TOR and RCS has attracted only minor attention. In our previous experiments, yeast parental strain and its derivatives defective in the TOR proteins demonstrated different intracellular levels of RCS [18] that were consistent with the previous suggestion that TOR inhibition suppressed the generation of RCS [19]. Here, we used TOR-deficient strains to investigate whether reactive carbonyls would lead to a hormetic adaptive response in yeast.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Yeast Strains and Chemicals

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were used as follows: JK9-3da (wild-type MAT a leu2–3, 112 ura3–52 rme1 trp1 his4 HML a) [20] and its derivatives MH349-3d (JK9-3da, tor1::LEU2-4) [21], SH121 (JK9-3da, ade2 tor2::ADE2-3/YCplac111::tor2-21ts) [22], and SH221 (JK9-3da, ade2 his3 HIS4 tor1::HIS3 tor2::ADE2-3/YCplac111::tor2-21ts) [23], kindly provided by Professor Michael Hall (University of Basel, Switzerland). Chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (USA) and Fluka (Germany).

2.2. Growth Conditions and Stress Induction

Yeast cells were grown at 28°С with shaking at 175 r.p.m. in a liquid medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 1% sucrose. For the experiments, the cultures after 24 h growth were split into two portions and diluted to about 75 × 106 cells/mL in a medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% glucose (YPD). Glucose was substituted for fructose in the respective experiments. In all diluted cultures, cells were grown under the conditions mentioned above for an additional 24-h period.

Aliquots of the main cultures (glucose- and fructose-grown) were exposed to different concentrations of glyoxal or methylglyoxal (Figure 1) followed by their incubation at 28°C for 1 h. Control cells were incubated under the same conditions but without stressing agents. After the incubation, cells from experimental or control cultures were collected by centrifugation (5 min, 8000 g) and washed with 50 mM of potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of α-dicarbonyl compounds: glyoxal and methylglyoxal.

2.3. Reproductive Ability

Yeast reproductive ability was analyzed by plating in triplicate on YPD agar after proper dilution. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 3 days and the colony-forming units (CFU) were counted [24]. Reproductive ability was expressed as a percentage of the total number of cells plating on YPD agar. Experimental data are expressed as the mean value of 3–6 independent experiments ± the standard error of the mean (SEM).

3. Results and Discussion

Mild stress and hormesis are the most likely explanations for the beneficial effects of low doses of toxic substances [2527]. The hormetic response is determined by the substance nature, physiological state of the organism, and specificity of downstream targets influenced [2831]. A wide variety of stressing agents have beneficial hormetic effects, however, the potential role of reactive carbonyls has not been intensively investigated. To study whether RCS would lead to a hormetic adaptive response in yeast and TOR pathway would be involved in RCS-induced carbonyl stress, we used S. cerevisiae JK9-3da (parent strain) and its TOR mutants: TOR1 and TOR2 single mutants (Δtor1 and Δtor2) as well as TOR1 TOR2 double mutant (Δtor1Δtor2). The yeast was grown on glucose or fructose since we have recently found that carbon substrate in cultivation medium was an important factor of the endogenous generation of RCS and determined yeast hormetic phenotype [18, 30, 32]. Monosaccharides are usually used as carbon and energy source for yeast growth. Normal metabolic processes like glycolysis/fermentation are tightly associated with the generation of α-dicarbonyl compounds [5]. Reactive carbonyls, and α-dicarbonyl compounds, in particular, are found to be about 20,000-fold more reactive than reducing carbohydrates [4]; therefore α-dicarbonyls like glyoxal and methylglyoxal (Figure 1) can be highly toxic compounds [33, 34].

The impact of different concentrations of glyoxal on yeast reproductive ability is shown in Figure 2. The biphasic dependence, characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose repression of yeast colony growth, has been found for glucose-grown cultures (Figures 2(a)2(c)) with the exception of the TOR1 TOR2 double mutant (Figure 2(d)). Wild-type cells and both single mutants grown in glucose-containing medium demonstrated the peak hormetic response at 5 mmol/L glyoxal. A hormetic effect usually can be observed under mild stress conditions as an increase in biological function between the ranges of 30–60% [35]. Our data are in good agreement with the above-mentioned: at the hormetic concentration of glyoxal, wild type and both single knockouts showed about 168%, 134%, and 135% of the initial reproductive ability (without glyoxal), respectively. The parameter decreased with further increasing glyoxal concentration. At 40 mmol/L glyoxal, yeast colony growth dropped to about 46–67% of the control reproductive ability. At the highest glyoxal concentrations used (≥80 mmol/L), the reproductive ability of the TOR1 and TOR2 single mutants dramatically decreased to the lowest values; and very few of the knockout cells were able to survive after the treatment. Parental strain demonstrated similar to the single mutants sharp reduction of reproductive ability only after cell exposure to 0.8–1.6 mol/L glyoxal.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of glyoxal on the reproductive ability of S. cerevisiae JK9-3da wild type (a) and its mutants TOR1 (b), TOR 2 (c), and TOR1 TOR2 (d). Results are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6).

Fructose-grown, unlike glucose-grown cells, did not show a hormetic response at any glyoxal concentration used. Moreover, the reproductive ability of fructose-grown wild type and two single mutants under glyoxal-induced stress was by several-fold lower than that of respective glucose-grown yeast (Figures 2(a)2(c)). The only exception occurs for the two highest glyoxal concentrations used at which very few of both the studied cell groups (glucose- and fructose-grown) survived.

In the previous reports, the defensive effect of fructose against stressful challenges has been described [3639]. We have suggested that fructose via generation of reactive species was capable of provoking a mild/temporary stress that resulted in the acquisition of resistance to severe stress [40, 41]. The suggestion was prompted by the fact that fructose-grown compared to glucose-grown yeast demonstrated higher survival after exposure to low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide [42]. Our previous data also demonstrated that in fructose-grown cells, the peak hormetic response was shifted to higher concentrations of H2O2 as compared to glucose-grown yeast [30, 32].

Unlike the abovementioned studies, the data presented here demonstrated no beneficial impact of fructose on yeast survival under glyoxal-induced carbonyl stress (Figures 2(a)2(c)). Moreover, glyoxal was more toxic for fructose-grown parental cells and single mutants than respective glucose-grown yeast. Surprisingly, this was not the case for the TOR1 TOR2 double mutant; both types of Δtor1Δtor2 cells studied (glucose- and fructose-grown) demonstrated virtually the same survival after exposure to glyoxal (Figure 2(d)). Interestingly, at certain glyoxal concentrations, the double knockout had reproductive ability several orders of magnitude higher than its single mutant counterparts. It was even more surprising that fructose-grown double mutant after exposure to 5–80 mmol/L glyoxal showed about 2-fold higher colony growth than fructose-grown wild type (Figures 2(a) and 2(d)).

Exposure to methylglyoxal resulted in similar patterns of carbohydrate- and TOR-dependent colony growth of the yeast strains (Figure 3). Glucose-grown wild type (Figure 3(a)) demonstrated the peak of hormetic response at 0.5–5 mmol/L methylglyoxal with reproductive ability about 1.5-3-fold higher than that in control cells (without methylglyoxal). In comparison, fructose-grown parental cells showed a weak tendency to increase their reproductive ability at low concentrations of methylglyoxal (Figure 3(a)). Both the studied glucose-grown TOR1 and TOR2 single mutants demonstrated the peak hormetic response (148–200%) after the yeast treatment with 0.5–1 mmol/L methylglyoxal, while it was not the case for their fructose-grown counterparts at any methylglyoxal concentration used (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). In general, the TOR1 and TOR2 single knockouts grown in glucose-containing medium significantly lost their viability after exposure to 2–5 mmol/L methylglyoxal. Fructose-grown single mutants demonstrated extremely low survival after their incubation with methylglyoxal at any concentrations used. High toxicity of exogenous glyoxal and methylglyoxal towards single knockouts (Figures 2(b), 2(c), 3(b), and 3(c)) correlates with their relatively low total intracellular level of α-dicarbonyl compounds [18] and a remarkably high activity of glyoxalase I detoxifying α-dicarbonyls [32]. The TOR1 and TOR2 proteins share common functions and therefore can compensate for the loss of each other [43, 44]. This could explain a similar behavior of the single mutants under the same experimental conditions (Figures 2(b), 2(c), 3(b), and 3(c)). The double mutant treated with either glyoxal (Figure 2(d)) or methylglyoxal (Figure 3(d)) exhibited a phenotype not evident in either single mutant (Figures 2(b), 2(c), 3(b), and 3(c)). There may be some compensatory mechanisms for the simultaneous lack of TOR1 and TOR2 since generally, the reproductive ability of the double knockout under stressful conditions was significantly higher than that of its single mutant counterparts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of methylglyoxal on the reproductive ability of S. cerevisiae JK9-3da wild type (a) and its mutants TOR1 (b), TOR2 (c), and TOR1 TOR2 (d). Results are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6).

4. Conclusion

Glyoxal and methylglyoxal induce TOR- and monosaccharide-dependent hormetic adaptive response in S. cerevisiae. The mutations in either TOR1 or TOR2 gene make yeast highly sensitive to both α-dicarbonyls. Nevertheless, methylglyoxal is more toxic towards yeast cells than glyoxal, and hormetic concentrations of methylglyoxal are lower than those of glyoxal. These data correspond well to the observations by Hoon and colleagues [45]. The TOR1 and TOR2 single mutants indicate a similar behavior under the same experimental conditions, which can be explained by the well-documented fact that TOR1 and TOR2 share common functions in the yeast. Simultaneous mutations in the TOR1 and TOR2 genes make yeast more susceptible to RCS than parental cells, but double mutant survives better under RCS-induced carbonyl stress than its single mutant counterparts. These results suggest the presence of compensatory mechanism(s) when both TOR1 and TOR2 are depleted. The information obtained could be useful to investigate RCS-mediated nonenzymatic processes and their involvement in metabolic disorders and related pathological processes.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Professor Michael Hall for providing the yeast strains and Mrs. Bohdana Valishkevych for technical assistance. This work was partially supported by the grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0118U003477).

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are (1) originally obtained in this study and (2) literature data available in respective sources referred to in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Uribarri J., Cai W., Peppa M., et al. Circulating glycotoxins and dietary advanced glycation end products: two links to inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2007;62(4):427–433. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.4.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Colombo G., Aldini G., Orioli M., et al. Water-soluble α,β-unsaturated aldehydes of cigarette smoke induce carbonylation of human serum albumin. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2010;12(3):349–364. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robert L., Robert A.-M., Labat-Robert J. The Maillard reaction-illicite (bio) chemistry in tissues and food. Pathologie Biologie. 2011;59(6):321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Turk Z. Glycotoxines, carbonyl stress and relevance to diabetes and its complications. Physiological Research. 2010;59(2):147–156. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.931585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inoue Y., Maeta K., Nomura W. Glyoxalase system in yeasts: structure, function, and physiology. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2011;22(3):278–284. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Semchyshyn H. Reactive carbonyl species in vivo: generation and dual biological effects. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:p. 10. doi: 10.1155/2014/417842.417842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ott C., Jacobs K., Haucke E., Navarrete Santos A., Grune T., Simm A. Role of advanced glycation end products in cellular signaling. Redox Biology. 2014;2:411–429. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Talukdar D., Chaudhuri B. S., Ray M., Ray S. Critical evaluation of toxic versus beneficial effects of methylglyoxal. Biochemistry. 2009;74(10):1059–1069. doi: 10.1134/s0006297909100010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Groeger A. L., Freeman B. A. Signaling actions of electrophiles: anti-inflammatory therapeutic candidates. Molecular Interventions. 2010;10(1):39–50. doi: 10.1124/mi.10.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Calabrese V., Cornelius C., Dinkova-Kostova A. T., Calabrese E. J., Mattson M. P. Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2010;13(11):1763–1811. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Radak Z., Ishihara K., Tekus E., et al. Exercise, oxidants, and antioxidants change the shape of the bell-shaped hormesis curve. Redox Biology. 2017;12:285–290. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Forman H. J., Fukuto J. M., Miller T., Zhang H., Rinna A., Levy S. The chemistry of cell signaling by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and 4-hydroxynonenal. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2008;477(2):183–195. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Forman H. J. Reactive oxygen species and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes as second messengers in signal transduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1203(1):35–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05551.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mueller M. J., Berger S. Reactive electrophilic oxylipins: pattern recognition and signalling. Phytochemistry. 2009;70(13-14):1511–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yadav U. C. S., Ramana K. V. Regulation of NF-kB-induced inflammatory signaling by lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2013;2013:11. doi: 10.1155/2013/690545.690545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wullschleger S., Loewith R., Hall M. N. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell. 2006;124(3):471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lushchak O., Strilbytska O., Piskovatska V., Storey K. B., Koliada A., Vaiserman A. The role of the TOR pathway in mediating the link between nutrition and longevity. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2017;164:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2017.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Valishkevych B. V., Vasylkovska R. A., Lozinska L. M., Semchyshyn H. M. Fructose-induced carbonyl/oxidative stress in S. cerevisiae: involvement of TOR. Biochemistry Research International. 2016;2016:10. doi: 10.1155/2016/8917270.8917270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hipkiss A. R. Energy metabolism, proteotoxic stress and age-related dysfunction - protection by carnosine. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2011;32(4–6):267–278. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heitman J., Movva N., Hall M. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science. 1991;253(5022):905–909. doi: 10.1126/science.1715094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Helliwell S. B., Wagner P., Kunz J., Deuter-Reinhard M., Henriquez R., Hall M. N. TOR1 and TOR2 are structurally and functionally similar but not identical phosphatidylinositol kinase homologues in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1994;5(1):105–118. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schmidt A., Kunz J., Hall M. N. TOR2 is required for organization of the actin cytoskeleton in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996;93(24):13780–13785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Helliwell S. B., Howald I., Barbet N., Hall M. N. TOR2 is part of two related signaling pathways coordinating cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998;148(1):99–112. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Conconi A., Jager-Vottero P., Zhang X., Beard B. C., Smerdon M. J. Mitotic viability and metabolic competence in UV-irradiated yeast cells. Mutation Research/DNA Repair. 2000;459(1):55–64. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00057-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Verbeke P., Deries M., Clark B. F., Rattan S. I. Hormetic action of mild heat stress decreases the inducibility of protein oxidation and glycoxidation in human fibroblasts. Biogerontology. 2002;3(1-2):117–120. doi: 10.1023/a:1015284119308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Calabrese E. J. Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2008;27(7):1451–1474. doi: 10.1897/07-541.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lushchak V. I. Dissection of the hormetic curve: analysis of components and mechanisms. Dose Response. 2014;12(3):466–479. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.13-051.lushchak. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Calabrese V., Cornelius C., Dinkova-Kostova A. T., et al. Cellular stress responses, hormetic phytochemicals and vitagenes in aging and longevity. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Basis of Disease. 2012;1822(5):753–783. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ludovico P., Burhans W. C. Reactive oxygen species, ageing and the hormesis police. FEMS Yeast Research. 2014;14(1):33–39. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vasylkovska R., Petriv N., Semchyshyn H. Carbon sources for yeast growth as a precondition of hydrogen peroxide induced hormetic phenotype. International Journal of Microbiology. 2015;2015:8. doi: 10.1155/2015/697813.697813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Webb R., Hughes M., Thomas A., Morris K. The ability of exercise-associated oxidative stress to trigger redox-sensitive signalling responses. Antioxidants. 2017;6(3):p. 63. doi: 10.3390/antiox6030063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Semchyshyn H., Valishkevych B. Hormetic effect of H2O2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of TOR and glutathione reductase. Dose Response. 2016;14(2):1–12. doi: 10.1177/1559325816636130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roy A., Hashmi S., Li Z., Dement A. D., Hong Cho K., Kim J.-H. The glucose metabolite methylglyoxal inhibits expression of the glucose transporter genes by inactivating the cell surface glucose sensors Rgt2 and Snf3 in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2016;27(5):862–871. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e15-11-0789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ispolnov K., Gomes R. A., Silva M. S., Freire A. P. Extracellular methylglyoxal toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of glucose and phosphate ions. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008;104(4):1092–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Calabrese V., Cornelius C., Cuzzocrea S., Iavicoli I., Rizzarelli E., Calabrese E. J. Hormesis, cellular stress response and vitagenes as critical determinants in aging and longevity. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2011;32(4-6):279–304. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Valeri F., Boess F., Wolf A., Göldlin C., Boelsterli U. A. Fructose and tagatose protect against oxidative cell injury by iron Chelation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1997;22(1-2):257–268. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Macallister S. L., Choi J., Dedina L., O’Brien P. J. Metabolic mechanisms of methanol/formaldehyde in isolated rat hepatocytes: carbonyl-metabolizing enzymes versus oxidative stress. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2011;191(1–3):308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Spasojević I., Bajić A., Jovanović K., Spasić M., Andjus P. Protective role of fructose in the metabolism of astroglial C6 cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide. Carbohydrate Research. 2009;344(13):1676–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Frenzel J., Richter J., Eschrich K. Fructose inhibits apoptosis induced by reoxygenation in rat hepatocytes by decreasing reactive oxygen species via stabilization of the glutathione pool. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research. 2002;1542(1–3):82–94. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(01)00169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Semchyshyn H. M. Fructation in vivo: detrimental and protective effects of fructose. BioMed Research International. 2013;2013:p. 9. doi: 10.1155/2013/343914.343914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Semchyshyn H. Is part of the fructose effects on health related to increased AGE formation? In: Uribarri J., editor. Dietary AGEs and Their Role in Health and Disease. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Taylor & Francis Group; 2018. pp. 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Semchyshyn H. M., Lozinska L. M. Fructose protects baker’s yeast against peroxide stress: potential role of catalase and superoxide dismutase. FEMS Yeast Research. 2012;12(7):761–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00826.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shertz C. A., Bastidas R. J., Li W., Heitman J., Cardenas M. E. Conservation, duplication, and loss of the Tor signaling pathway in the fungal kingdom. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):p. 510. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Loewith R., Hall M. N. Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics. 2011;189(4):1177–1201. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.133363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hoon S., Gebbia M., Costanzo M., Davis R. W., Giaever G., Nislow C. A global perspective of the genetic basis for carbonyl stress resistance. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics. 2011;1(3):219–231. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are (1) originally obtained in this study and (2) literature data available in respective sources referred to in the manuscript.


Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES