Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Neurosci. 2020 Jan 17;43(2):103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.12.004

Ion channel functions in early brain development

Richard S Smith 1, Christopher A Walsh 1
PMCID: PMC7092371  NIHMSID: NIHMS1569565  PMID: 31959360

Abstract

During prenatal brain development, ion channels are ubiquitous across several cell types, including progenitor cells and migrating neurons but their function has not been clear. In the past, ion channel dysfunction has been primarily studied in the context of postnatal, differentiated neurons that fire action potentials—notably ion channels mutated in the epilepsies—yet data now supports a surprising role in prenatal human brain disorders as well. Modern gene discovery approaches have identified defective ion channels in individuals with cerebral cortex malformations, which reflect abnormalities in early-to-middle stages of embryonic development (prior to ubiquitous action potentials). These human genetics studies and recent in utero animal modeling work suggest that precise control of ionic flux (calcium, sodium, and potassium) contributes to in utero developmental processes such as neural proliferation, migration, and differentiation.

Keywords: Cortical Development, Channelopathy, Brain Malformation, Ion Channel, Encephalopathy, Bioelectricity

Electrical Activity in the Developing Brain

In the instant following fertilization, human development begins with a Calcium- [Ca2+] mediated depolarization, highlighting the fact that electrical activity guides the earliest blueprint of the human body [1]. During the initial stages of lamination in the developing mammalian cerebral cortex, long before stable synapse formation and abundant action potentials, slow depolarizing Ca2+ transients are observed ubiquitously in new-born neurons and progenitors [2,3]. Yet little is known regarding how these prenatal neurophysiological properties contribute to cortical developmental processes across species, including human-related neurodevelopmental diseases. While cellular excitability has been extensively studied for its guiding role in shaping postnatal sensory neural circuits and synapses (Reviewed in[4,5]), data now also supports an early instructional role for precise ion channel function in prenatal mouse, ferret, and human cerebral cortex development.

Recent studies have identified ion channel dysfunction associated with defects of brain development in humans, including voltage-gated sodium channel (NaV) (see Glossary) and glutamate receptor families that, when mutated, alter cellular excitability [68]. Connecting these ion channel disease pathologies to developmental excitability, recent animals studies have implicated aberrant membrane potentials in regulating early cortical processes such as cellular proliferation and neural cell fate determination in mice [9,10], as well as cell migration in the gyrencephalic ferret brain [6]. Within prenatal populations of transiently dividing cells and differentiating neurons, these aforementioned cellular process are critical to gyri and sulci formation in the human brain (x < 24 weeks’ gestation), employing several ion channel types and electrical coupling to generate slower cellular depolarization kinetics, without abundant action potentials [6,1113]. Alternatively, in the postnatal cortex, the action potential dominates neurophysiology, and aberrant action potential pathophysiology is associated with multiple channelopathies, including epilepsy and pain [14]. Therefore, unlike adult channelopathy pathophysiology, developmental channelopathies likely hijack the fetal-specific slower biophysical kinetics and cellular properties to generate distinct disease features.

When classifying an ion channel dysfunction to a channelopathy, pathogenic channels are often first described functionally as Gain-of-function (GOF) or Loss-of-Function (LOF), yet the presence of highly heterogenous phenotypes resulting from identical GOF mutations across individuals suggests the influence of multiple factors in disease severity. Therefore, in addition to the degree of ion channel dysfunction (e.g. GOF), other significant variables likely contributing to heterogeneity include temporal/spatial gene expression, cell-type susceptibility, environment, and cell/circuit compensatory mechanisms. However, these variables are not mutually exclusive, as developmental channelopathies likely represent a continuum of blended ion channel dysfunction between in utero and postnatal roles, shifting key biological processes timelines. Moreover, in humans, several cortical channelopathy diseases develop within the first years after birth, including infantile epilepsies and encephalopathies [14,15], as well as non-cortical diseases such as infantile onset spinocerebellar ataxia [16]. In this review, we highlight ion channel genes associated with human prenatal cortical developmental channelopathies and the permissive immature properties distinct from postnatal channelopathies (e.g. epilepsy) that permit in utero diseases. Last, we discuss emerging in utero animal model studies evaluating bioelectric features (i.e. membrane potential) in developing cortex circuit processes, including ion channel disease modeling in ferrets, which due to their gyrencephalic brain serve as an important model for folding-associated cortical malformations.

Human Genetic Studies of Individuals with Brain Malformations, and Gene Expression Studies

The advent of next generation sequencing approaches to study individuals with Malformations of Cortical Development (MCDs), along with the introduction of intensive surveys of the developing human brain transcriptome, epigenome and somatic mutations, including those from the Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network [17] and the PsychENCODE consortium [18], have facilitated the identification of novel mechanisms involved in developing neural circuit processes, including genes linked to cell-cycle proliferation, migration, and differentiation [19]. To this end, the gold standard for identifying novel biological pathways continues to be human genetics, including the recent work identifying a cortical malformation-causing pathway rooted in dysfunctional ion conducting proteins (sodium channels and glutamate receptors).

Disease Follows Gene Expression.

For a mutated gene to have a pathogenic effect in a given neural tissue, its expression must be present at sufficient levels either at the time of generation of the neural circuit (e.g. MCDs), or at the time of the dysfunction (e.g. epilepsy). Human developmental and postnatal channelopathies of sodium and glutamate channels follow this susceptibility model, with embryonically enriched channel subtypes/subunits being more susceptible to MCDs (GRIN2B, SCN3A) and postnatally enriched subunits (GRIN2A, SCN1A) being associated with epilepsies [6,20,21]. While this pre/post-natal differential regulation of sodium and glutamate channels also persists in rodents [22,23], transgenic mouse models targeting these disease genes lack robust structural cortical phenotypes [24], suggesting a rodent-specific molecular and physiological profile when comparing with humans. However, a conserved functional role for sodium channels within the developing brain may exist as far back as the fly, with a sodium channel gene (para) promoting proliferation [25]. New single-cell RNA technologies enable fine resolution mapping of gene spatial structure in the human fetal cortex by placing sodium channels (SCN3A) within non-excitable cells, including progenitor cells enriched in humans, as well as newborn neurons [6]. Moreover, the expansion of single cell RNA surveys across human developmental time points [18,26], including cell types critical to the expansion of human cortical gyrification, provides a tractable platform for screening novel disease candidate genes, as well as expanding mechanistic hypotheses.

Glutamate Receptors and Brain Malformations

Glutamate is the most abundant neurotransmitter in the brain, activating three ionotropic receptors (AMPA, Kainate and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs)) to execute critical functions such as cellular excitability and plasticity. NMDARs are heterotetrameric ligand- and voltage-gated ion channels expressed throughout the brain, consisting of two GluN1 subunits (GRIN1) and two subunits that are either GluN2 or GluN3 (GRIN2A-D and GRIN3A-B, respectively). Upon the binding of glutamate and glycine to NMDARs subunits, the ionotropic NMDARs conduct Ca++, and to a lesser extent Na+ and K+ ions, resulting in increased cellular excitability [27]. The ionic influx, primarily Ca++, activates abundant intracellular signaling cascades and cellular targets, akin to metabotropic activation [27]. While glutamate receptor dysfunction has been studied in the human and rodent postnatal brain [28], new data in humans suggest that glutamate receptor dysfunction during fetal development can cause cerebral cortex malformations [7,8](See Figure 2A), as well other neurological conditions [29,30]. The most common malformation of cortical development resulting from GRIN1 and GRIN2B mutations is polymicrogyria (PMG), which is characterized by an overfolded cerebral cortex (See Figure 2B) [31]. Several gene families, including canonically-described microtubules tied to migration disorders, are known to cause PMG when mutated, yet the mechanisms of cortical disruption and the connecting thread to developmental channelopathy pathology remain poorly understood [32].

Figure 2. Cortical malformations associated with sodium and glutamate receptor dysfunction.

Figure 2

In humans, the most common cortical malformation disease is Polymicrogyria (PMG), a developmental brain malformation characterized by the presence of multiple, abnormally small gyri in the cerebral cortex [31]. A. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of individuals with mutations within ion channel genes, sodium channel alpha subunit 3, SCN3A (NaV1.3), NMDAR receptor subunits GRIN1 (GluN1) and GRIN2B (GluN2B), when mutated are capable of causing PMG, with various degrees of severity. Reproduced from [6,7,8] B. Left, MRI reconstruction of an individual with SCN3A mutation and resulting perisylvian PMG. Coronal section highlights the affected area. Right, Illustration of neocortical architecture of a normal (bottom) and diseased (top, developmental malformation, PMG) hemispheres, including gray and white matter. Red regions indicate affected PMG area, depicting gyral fusing to give a “sawtooth”-like appearance. From Smith et al, 2018 [6]. SCN3A (NaV1.3), voltage-gated sodium channel; GRIN1 (GluN1) and GRIN2B (GluN2B), NMDAR subunits.

Highlighting the specialized role of NMDARs in the prenatal cerebral cortex, functional NMDARs are present long before stable synapses form [33], with functional GluN2B and GluN1 subunits expressed in cortical progenitor cells and neurons [20,21,34]. During mid-fetal human cortex development, the composition of NMDAR subunits flips (GRIN2B- >GRIN2A) [21]. This flip in the ratio of GluN2B:GluN2A containing subunits is thought to be a key switch for learning behaviors in mice [23]. Unlike individuals with GRIN1 and GRIN2B mutations causing MCDs, pathogenic GRIN2A (GluN2A) mutations have not been described to cause MCDs [35]. Despite the lack of GRIN2A causing structural cortical malformations (i.e. PMG), GRIN2A postnatal encephalopathies are generally more severe than the PMG- causing GRIN2B encephalopathies [29], likely rooted in GRIN2A’s postnatal enhanced enrichment pattern. However, unlike the GRIN2B->GRIN2A transition, GRIN1 is ubiquitously expressed throughout life and individuals with pathogenic GRIN1 mutations have severe and wide-ranging phenotypes in addition to MCDs, including intractable epilepsy and impaired cognitive function [8].

To date, MCD-associated GRIN1 and GRIN2B mutations are primarily functionally described as gain-of-function (GOF) pathophysiology, enhancing NMDAR activation and excitability [7,8,36]. Lending further support to the NMDAR GOF MCD hypothesis, MCDs can result in human metabolic conditions of elevated glycine [37]. Since Glycine and Glutamate co-binding is required for NMDAR activation, NMDAR mutations that decrease Glycine affinity (i.e. making it more potent) can over-activate NMDARs [27,38]. Mechanisms of NMDAR GOF are varied, including early removal of Mg+ block, increased permeation of Ca++, and glutamate affinity for binding site. As NMDARs are heterotetrameric, GOF effects can be described as “Dominant Positive”, meaning that one mutated GluN subunit can affect the other subunits to enhance NMDAR activation. In mice, this over-activation of glutamate receptors causes excess Ca++ influx, triggering intracellular signaling cascades that can result in excitotoxicity and cell death [39,40]. In human neural progenitor cell cultures, glutamate can increase progenitor proliferation [41]. Modulating Ca++ influx and excitability as progenitor cells generate neurons can affect several developmental processes, including bidirectional control of neurogenesis [42], NMDAR-mediated shift in neuronal differentiation [43], supporting neuronal survival [44] and guiding radial migration [45], calcium mobilization defects in Zellweger syndrome [46], and inactivation of DNA synthesis [47] (Reviewed in [48,49]). One link could include the of role of Ca++ in cytoskeletal remodeling, such as microtubule polymerization and assembly, which represent key functions of MCD-related genes, LIS1, DCX, and Tubulinopathies [19,32].

Sodium Channels and Brain Malformations

Voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV’s) are highly conserved proteins across species, and several knockout models of NaV subtypes are lethal (including in fly and mice). Similarly, in humans, complete NaV knockouts (SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN3A; resulting in a complete loss of function of both copies of the gene) are typically not observed in the population (The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD)), although individuals with point mutations and copy number changes within NaV genes are present and these mutations result in a range of developmental and adult disorders. The spectrum of channelopathy diseases resulting from pathogenic NaV’s mutations depends primarily on the NaV subtype, the mutation’s functional consequence (e.g. GOF), and the gene’s temporal-spatial expression pattern. NaV genes expressed abundantly in postnatal brains, such as SCN1A and SCN2A, are associated with generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures and other seizure types (GEFS+); Dravet syndrome reflects SCN1A mutations [14], and benign familial neonatal-infantile seizures and Ohtahara syndrome reflect SCN2A mutations [14,48,49]. Of these NaV diseases, the most extensively studied is Dravet syndrome (SCN1A), and most pathogenic mutations in this gene result in NaV LOF pathophysiology and are accompanied by intractable epilepsy, but without a detectable MCD (See Figure 3) [50]. However, a few examples of SCN1A variants have been reported to be associated with small cortical lesions, including focal cortical dysplasia and periventricular nodular heterotopia [51].

Figure 3. Biophysical properties of sodium channel mutations which result in diverse channelopathy diseases.

Figure 3.

Top Left, Schematic of sodium channel gating and correlation with representative whole-cell recordings. Two of the voltage clamp recordings are of pathogenic voltage-gated sodium channels, illustrating a gain-of-function mutation (red trace, SCN3A MCD F1759Y, increased non-inactivating persistent sodium current) [6] and a loss-of-function mutation (blue trace, Dravet associated SCN1A G1674R impairs NaV1.1 trafficking) [106]. Gray trace represents Control experiment. Bottom, square trace represents a depolarizing step (−70mV to 0mV), and voltage clamp NaV traces are normalized for visualization. Right, NaV illustration depicting Na+ ion flux in the context of GOF and LOF mutations. LOF NaV mutations are represented as defective NaV biophysical properties, or by decreased cell surface expression properties which result in decreased Na+ influx [53]. MCD, Malformation of Cortical Development; SCN3A (NaV1.3), or SCN1A (NaV1.1), voltage-gated sodium channel; GOF and LOF, Gain- and Loss-of-function, respectively.

NaV’s vital role in action potential genesis has been a centerpiece of neurophysiological research for more than 60 years. However, less has been known about the function of NaV’s in the prenatal cerebral cortex, where action potentials are sparse [6,12]. New data suggest that an embryonically enriched NaV subtype, SCN3A (encoding NaV1.3), can disrupt fetal cortical development in humans when mutated, causing MCDs [6]. MCD-causing SCN3A pathogenic mutations are distributed across key functional NaV transmembrane domains, including segments critical for voltage-dependent inactivation (DIV-S6) and voltage-sensing (S4), resulting in GOF effects [6] (Figure 4). Within inherited GOF SCN3A mutations, a wide phenotypic variability in brain diseases exists, as affected brain areas range from unilateral perisylvian to a broader frontal-parietal distribution, and resulting cortical malformations are mostly accompanied by oral motor deficits and not accompanied by seizures [6]. On the other hand, other SCN3A alleles that are functionally described as LOF have been associated with cases of neonatal onset seizures and epileptic encephalopathy without detectable MCDs [5254] (See Figure 4). Additionally, some epilepsy-associated SCN3A variants generate a GOF increase in persistent current (I-Nap), but without MCD [5456], further highlighting the need for continued genotype-phenotype functional studies. Similarly, some epilepsy-associated SCN1A mutations generate increased I-Nap [57].

Figure 4. Locations of mutations within sodium channel subtypes resulting in developmental and postnatal channelopathies in humans.

Figure 4.

Transmembrane topology of NaV channel depicting location of missense variants within the CNS enriched sodium channel subtypes, SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A (NaV1.1, NaV1.2, and Nav1.3, respectively). SCN1A related conditions: febrile seizures and other seizure types (GEFS+, light green), severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI, dark green); SCN2A related disorders: infantile epileptic encephalopathy (IEE, blue), Benign infantile seizures (BIS, Blue), autism spectrum disorder/intellectual disability (ASD/ID, purple); SCN3A related disorders: malformations in cortical development (MCDs, orange), and Epilepsy Syndrome (pink; includes focal, tonic, partial, IEE), or blended MCD/EE phenotype (orange/pink). SCN1A, SCN2A and SCN3A are paralogous genes with conserved functional domains, with positional data for amino acid location overlaid and approximated from [6,14,5355,82,107109].

In both humans and rodents, NaV1.3 is differentially enriched during gestational periods in the cortex, in contrast to SCN1A which is enriched postnatally [6,22]. Consequently, NaV1.3’s spatio-temporal structure is primed for a developmental pathology, as it is enriched in prenatal cortical radial glial progenitor cells (RGCs), newborn neurons, and Cajal-Retzius cells [6,58]. During lamination in the developing cortex, several cell-types and transition states exist (e.g. cell cycle), including dividing RGCs and differentiating neurons (which possess sodium currents), but with vastly different neurophysiology compared to adult spiking neurophysiology [13]. Within spiking and non-spiking cells, sodium can activate several downstream effector targets, including other ion channels (Ca++, K+), and can trigger a cascade of pathways, in some cases cell death [39,59]. SCN3A GOF mutations demonstrate an increased, non-inactivating, persistent Na+ currents (See Figure 3), yet how cell-types in the developing cortex (progenitor, migrating, or mature neuron) handle excess Na+ flux is only beginning to be understood (e.g. receptor expression, cell state, Vm). Moreover, modeling of SCN3A GOF mutations in the gyrencephalic ferret brain revealed migratory deficits, as well as surprising non-cell autonomous effects [6], which could suggest a pathological basis in altered neurotransmitter/neuropeptide release or electrical coupling onto neighboring cells [39,60]. Further, mice with hypomorphic Scn3a (LOF) have normal developmental features, but with evoked seizures [53]. Future work to elaborate identified SCN3A mutations resulting in MCDs vs. infantile epilepsy will elucidate the delicate balance of sodium flux in the developing cortex and how modifications can differentially contribute to pre- and postnatal channelopathy diseases.

Ion channel dysfunction alters postnatal brain development

The end of the gestational period does not mark the end of maturation of cortical circuits, as several developmental processes continue postnatally, including cell death, myelination, and synaptic pruning (Figure 1). Uncontrolled seizures, for example can lead to poor cognitive outcomes and intellectual disability in children [61,62]. Two classes of ion channel diseases have been described that affect neurodevelopment in the postnatal period, Epileptic Encephalopathies (EE) and Developmental Encephalopathies (DE). EE are broadly defined diseases relating epileptic activity to risk for decreased cerebral function, whereas DE describe disorders in which developmental delay emerges before the onset of epileptic activity or in the presence of mild epileptic activity [63]. In this regard, MCDs resulting from SCN3A, GRIN1A and GRIN2B mutations are not easily classified within these postnatal encephalopathies, since the structural damage is occurring in utero and it remains to be precisely defined what is a pathogenic epileptogenic signal in the gestational brain. Interestingly, while early postnatal seizures are largely cortical, they shift to other brain regions later in life (such as the hippocampus) [64], thus resulting in a differential susceptibility to damage as life progresses [65]. Moreover, Dravet syndrome is generally considered an EE [66], whereby epileptic activity underlies progressive brain dysfunction, yet cognitive delay symptoms may develop independent of seizures, suggesting an additional sodium-mediated developmental pathophysiology separate from classic EE [67]. Future studies of this developmental shift in seizure origin, as well as defining an in utero epileptogenic network, represent an important expansion of the etiology of these developmental diseases.

Figure 1 [KEY FIGURE]. Timeline of ion channel disease and neurodevelopmental processes.

Figure 1 [KEY FIGURE]

Top, timeline of human gestation from early cortical formation, including key developmental cellular processes and milestones (Reviewed in [105]), highlighting the development of abundant action potentials in the cerebral cortex [12]. Bottom, ion channel genes (SCN3A, GRIN1, and GRIN2B) implicated in cortical malformations (MCDs) all maintain high expression in the developing human cortex [6,20,21]. The specified genes are representative and are not a comprehensive list.

Infantile encephalopathies (IE) are a type of EE, and can be caused by improperly functioning receptors and ion channels (e.g. Glycine, K+, and Na+, etc..), resulting in a spectrum of conditions that are generally not associated with MCDs [62,67]. For example, a sodium-activated potassium channel (KCNT1) causes a heterogeneous condition of IE with onset in the first 6 months, acquired microcephaly (small brain) and developmental delay, suggesting that damage in the early neonatal period can alter postnatal brain development [68,69]. Early infantile EE (EEIE13) resulting from SCN8A (NaV1.6) mutations is also disruptive to neonatal brain development, resulting in developmental regression and intellectual disability [70]. In contrast, epilepsy syndromes which remit on a shorter timeline (<6 weeks), such as those caused by mutations in potassium channel subunits KV7.2 and 7.3, (KCNQ2 and KCNQ3, respectively), are generally associated with normal cognitive development (Reviewed in [71]). Moreover, mixing of phenotypes do exists, as KCNQ2 can cause epileptic and cognitive deficits in both GOF and LOF models at the exact same codon (albeit with different amino acid substitutions), suggesting a bidirectional cellular effect of altered excitation as the pathological basis [72]. GRIN2B mutations can result in early life epilepsies, including infantile spasms, and largely described as GOF [30,73]. In some individuals with KCNQ2, SCN3A, or STXBP1 encephalopathy, epilepsy resolves relatively early in adolescence, but the developmental consequences persist long thereafter [15,52]. Similar to the above described heterogenous EE phenotypes, ion channel mutations associated with MCDs also generate diverse disease features, including a role for GRIN2A [35] and SCN3A in speech development [6]. Moreover, individuals with SCN2A mutations display a complex phenotype that can include a wide range of epilepsy and encephalopathy syndromes, as well as autism [14,48,49] (See Figure 4). Future work expanding the genotype-phenotype relationships for single genes (e.g. GRIN2B) will be critical to understanding convergent and divergent mechanisms of pathophysiology.

Ca++ channel subunits are also implicated in wide-ranging postnatal channelopathies, including CACNA1A and CACNA1E in DE and EE [74,75], CACNA4A in familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia [76], and CACNA1C in Timothy Syndrome, which includes autism phenotypes [77]. Last, proteins that interact with pore-forming ion channel subunits can also result in encephalopathies, such as NaV auxiliary β subunits (β-NaV), which support the alpha subunit NaV ion conduction properties [78]. In rodent models, β-NaV knockdown can alter cortical neurite development, including non-canonical roles of Fyn kinases and secreted cell adhesion molecules, as well as cell-type-specific pathology rooted in maturation of GABAergic neurons [7981]. Cell-type susceptibility represents a key avenue for future research on EE pathophysiology, as well as on developmental psychiatric diseases classified as “interneuronopathies”, such as SCN2A in autism and epilepsy syndromes [82].

Single gene ion channel disorders are heterogeneous and unique to each individual

Penetrance is a feature of dominantly inherited genetic diseases measured by the proportion of carriers showing the characteristic phenotype(s). Plainly, three individuals within a multigenerational family can possess the same pathogenic channel mutation, but have three different disease phenotypes; one individual might have the severe disease, another might have a less severe version, and the last no apparent disease phenotype. This genetic feature of incomplete penetrance and variable phenotypes is common across channelopathies, with an excess of 60% of carriers not displaying a complete disease phenotype [83]. Of the brain channelopathies, decreased penetrance is typically observed with GOF mutations in a dominant disease inheritance model [6,57]. The large phenotypic variability of channelopathies is best illustrated in monozygotic twins studies (identical ion channel gene mutations), demonstrating both concordant and discordant features depending on the mutation classification (e.g. GOF) and ion channel type being affected [84,85]. Between individuals, the basis for decreased penetrance and variable phenotypes is likely multifactorial, including individual variations in gene expressivity [86], modifier genes [87,88], epigenetic factors [89], and environmental interactions (Reviewed in [90]). For example, the PLOG genetic modifiers of Dravet syndrome can cause brain damage [91], and channel mutations that would otherwise be benign under normal conditions can result in pathogenicity following exposure to noxious stimuli [89]. Future work exploring the selective susceptibility of specific mutations and penetrance-modifying mechanisms represents critical knowledge towards the design of precision therapies.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Historically, channelopathies were commonly viewed as diseases of aberrant cellular excitation in postnatal nervous tissue, with roots in altered action potential firing features. Here, we describe “Developmental Channelopathies” as diseases of prenatal neural circuits involving non-excitable cortical progenitor cells and newly born neurons. Moreover, the absence of abundant action potential electrogenesis in the fetal brain [12], in tandem with the several immature cellular states, likely contributes a unique neurophysiological signature that differs between pre- and postnatal neural circuits. Within the prenatal rodent cortex, altering resting membrane potential is sufficient to disrupt progenitor proliferative properties and cell fate [9,10], and in ferrets increased sodium led to both cell- and non-cell autonomous effects leading to gyri misfolding [6], suggesting small excitability changes are sufficient to disrupt cortical development across several trajectories. However, open questions remain, including how ion channel mutations differentially influence intrinsic cellular properties across transient cell-types (immature vs. mature). For example, consider the simple scenario of modeling a single mutation within two anatomically and functionally similar neuron types (sensory vs sympathetic ganglion neurons) which results in different outputs (hyper- and hypo -excitability, respectively)[92]. One can similarly envision a more pronounced differential disease pathology affecting the very heterogenous cortical cell-types in their developmental properties. Complicating gene-to-mutation classifications further, even within a monogenic ion channel gene disorder (i.e. GRIN1), pathogenic mutations within in the same functional domains can result in highly heterogeneous manifestations, including non-PMG and PMG causing mutations [8]. Similar heterogeneous disease features are observed in sodium channels as well (See Figure 4). Future studies elaborating each allele individually and across cell-types, rather than relying on functional domain predictions and modeling, will be critical to accurate therapeutic development.

Human malformations of cortical development due to NMDAR point mutations have not been mechanistically described in animal models (to our knowledge). While human MCD-associated NMDAR genes have been studied in rodent knockdowns models, including a GRIN2B knockdown associated with a mild neuronal migration deficit [93], and a GRIN1 knockout generating mild layer IV defect [24], these lesions are subtle compared to human MCDs and represent LOF pathophysiology (human MCDs are generally GOF). While some rodent models of MCDs have proven effective for studying some human cortical defects (e.g. EML1) [94], their use in modeling gyrification defect diseases (i.e. PMG) is limited [95]. Important molecular, temporal, and genetic differences during gestation which result in the rodent lissencephalic cortex generally do not recapitulate human MCDs well. One of these molecular differences is that rodents have fewer progenitor cell types than what is observed in gyrencephalic mammals, including basal radial glial cells (bRGCs), which suggests rodents lack the progenitor diversity required for cortical expansion [96]. Using primate models in this context is a possibility to consider, but of note, small primates such as marmosets are lissencephalic, and therefore alternative non-primate animal models to study gyrencephalic brains seems critical. One example is the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo), which possess folded neocortex and increased progenitor cell diversity [97]. The developmentally tractable ferret brain therefore offers a promising platform for mechanistic testing of cortical neurodevelopmental diseases associated with gyrification deficits [97], such as developmental channelopathies [6,98,99]. Last, while rodent studies fail to demonstrate robust structural cortex malformations, they likely represent a viable model for studies of non-malformation causing neurodevelopmental diseases, especially those hypothesized to affect interneuron maturation (e.g. SCN2A and ASD [82]).

Bioelectricity studies evaluating electrical signals across singles cells or groups of cells in developing organisms is a rapidly growing field and hypothesizes roles for excitability in a wide variety of developmental processes and tissue types [100]. For example, K+ channels have been demonstrated to promote limb development in zebra fish [101], and are also associated with dysmorphic facial features in humans [102,103]. Within the prenatal embryo, key cellular processes within non-excitable cells are readily modified by bioelectric properties, including membrane potential changes linked to oscillations which are fundamental for cell-cycle state and proliferation (Rev in [49]). In two recent cortical development bioelectric studies, in utero electroporation of K+ channels (hyperpolarized) or chemogenetic receptors (depolarized) in cortical progenitors and neurons suggests that depolarization maintains neurogenic properties [10], while increased early activity in migrating neurons may also act as a stop signal for migration [9]. Importantly, bioelectric changes in progenitor cells are capable of having widespread effects since progenitor cells maintain electrical synapses, enabling coupling of electrical activity [11,104]. In the future, neurophysiological research of excitation in the gestational cortex, as well as the connection between dysfunctional bioelectric mechanisms and canonical MCD-causing pathways (cellular proliferation, migration, and neural cell fate determination), should be explored (See Outstanding Questions).

OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS BOX.

  1. How do mutations distributed within an ion channel gene (e.g. GRIN1) generate a spectrum of resulting diseases (Malformation vs. Epilepsy)?

  2. How is an epileptogenic network defined in in utero vs. postnatal brains?

  3. How does a single pathogenic ion channel mutation affect cell-types differently within the same individual (dividing cells, excitatory ones, inhibitory, sensory)?

  4. What are the non-canonical targets of normal ion flux in the fetal cortex?

  5. What is the spatial-temporal expression structure of epileptic encephalopathy genes during early post-natal life?

  6. How does ion channel dysfunction resulting in aberrant electrical activity in the prenatal brain compare to well characterized malformation pathways?

HIGHLIGHTS.

  • A “Developmental Channelopathy” is an ion channel disease with a pathophysiological origin during the gestational period

  • Human genetics studies reveal that individuals with dysfunctional sodium and glutamate channels can have improperly folded cerebral cortices

  • The gestational brain is comprised of diverse and transient cell-types, including dividing and newly differentiated cells. Some of the mechanisms involved in developmental channelopathies during gestation are different from those acting postnatally during ion channel diseases.

  • Ion channel mutations that result in greater excitability (Gain-of-function) are often associated with human cortical malformations

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CAW was supported by R01 NS35129 and R01NS032457 from the NINDS, U01MH106883 from the NIMH, and the Allen Discovery Center program through The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group and is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. RSS was supported by NINDS F32NS100033801 and K99NS112604. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

GLOSSARY

Developmental channelopathy

Disease with a pathophysiological origin during gestational periods, caused by dysfunction of ion conducting proteins

Bioelectricity

Mode of electrical signaling across individual cells or fields of cells that is slower than neural spiking, particularly during development

Malformations of Cortical Development (MCD)

Structural abnormalities of the cerebral cortex arising due to aberrant developmental processes (e.g. cell division, migration)

Gain-of-Function (GOF)

Mutation resulting in new or enhanced activity of a protein. In the context of ion channels, GOF typically results in increased ion flux into cells.

Loss-of-Function (LOF)

Mutation resulting in lost or decreased activity of a protein. In the context of ion channels, LOF typically results in decreased ion flux into cells.

Gyrification

the developmental process of forming the stereotyped folds (gyri and sulci) of the cerebral cortex in certain species.

Polymicrogyria

a condition characterized by an overfolded cerebral cortex (from Greek: poly – many, micro – small, gyri – folds).

Encephalopathy

general term describing diseases of the brain that lead to dysfunctional properties (e.g. loss of cognitive function in epileptic encephalopathies)

Incomplete penetrance

when only a subset of individuals who carry a dominant disease-causing mutation display the characteristic disease phenotype (this is commonly observed in inherited channelopathies).

NaV

Voltage-gated sodium channel, (e.g. SCN3A), also called VGSC

NMDAR

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are ligand-gated ion channels; consists of two GluN1 subunits (GRIN1) and two subunits of GluN2 or GluN3 (GRIN2A-D and GRIN3A-B, respectively).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Bibliography

  • 1.Jaffe L (1986) Electrical Regulation of Sperm-Egg Fusion. Annual Review of Physiology 48, 191–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gu X et al. (1994) Spontaneous neuronal calcium spikes and waves during early differentiation. Journal of Neuroscience 14, 6325–6335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weissman TA et al. (2004) Calcium waves propagate through radial glial cells and modulate proliferation in the developing neocortex. Neuron 43, 647–661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kirkby LA et al. (2013) A Role for Correlated Spontaneous Activity in the Assembly of Neural Circuits. Neuron 80, 1129–1144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Katz LC and Shatz CJ (1996) Synaptic Activity and the Construction of Cortical Circuits. Science [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith RS et al. (2018) Sodium Channel SCN3A (NaV1.3) Regulation of Human Cerebral Cortical Folding and Oral Motor Development. Neuron DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Platzer K et al. (2017) GRIN2B encephalopathy: novel findings on phenotype, variant clustering, functional consequences and treatment aspects. Journal of Medical Genetics 54, 460–470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fry AE et al. (2018) De novo mutations in GRIN1 cause extensive bilateral polymicrogyria. Brain DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hurni N et al. (2017) Transient Cell-intrinsic Activity Regulates the Migration and Laminar Positioning of Cortical Projection Neurons. Cereb. Cortex 27, 3052–3063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vitali I et al. (2018) Progenitor Hyperpolarization Regulates the Sequential Generation of Neuronal Subtypes in the Developing Neocortex. Cell DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spitzer NC (2006) Electrical activity in early neuronal development. Nature 444, 707–712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moore AR et al. (2011) Spontaneous electrical activity in the human fetal cortex in vitro. J. Neurosci 31, 2391–2398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen DV et al. (2010) Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 464, 554–561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Catterall W (2012) Sodium Channel Mutations and Epilepsy. Jaspers Basic Mechanisms of the Epilepsies [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Olson HE et al. (2017) Genetics and genotype-phenotype correlations in early onset epileptic encephalopathy with burst suppression. Annals of Neurology 81, 419–429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bushart DD and Shakkottai VG (2019) Ion channel dysfunction in cerebellar ataxia. Neurosci. Lett 688, 41–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McConnell MJ et al. (2017) Intersection of diverse neuronal genomes and neuropsychiatric disease: The Brain Somatic Mosaicism Network. Science 356, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li M et al. (2018) Integrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks. Science 362, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jamuar SS and Walsh CA (2015) Genomic variants and variations in malformations of cortical development. Pediatr. Clin. North Am 62, 571–585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jantzie LL et al. (2015) Developmental expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunits in human white and gray matter: potential mechanism of increased vulnerability in the immature brain. Cereb. Cortex 25, 482–495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bagasrawala I et al. (2017) N-Methyl d-Aspartate Receptor Expression Patterns in the Human Fetal Cerebral Cortex. Cereb. Cortex 27, 5041–5053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gordon D et al. (1987) Tissue-specific expression of the RI and RII sodium channel subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 8682–8686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dumas TC (2005) Developmental regulation of cognitive abilities: modified composition of a molecular switch turns on associative learning. Progress in Neurobiology 76, 189–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iwasato T et al. (2000) Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex. Nature 406, 726–731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Piggott BJ et al. (2019) Paralytic, the Drosophila voltage-gated sodium channel, regulates proliferation of neural progenitors. Genes Dev. DOI: 10.1101/gad.330597.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jones A et al. (2009) The Allen Brain Atlas: 5 years and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 821–828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hansen KB et al. (2018) Structure, function, and allosteric modulation of NMDA receptors. The Journal of General Physiology 150, 1081–1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yuan H et al. (2015) Ionotropic GABA and Glutamate Receptor Mutations and Human Neurologic Diseases. Mol. Pharmacol 88, 203–217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Adam MP et al. (1993) GRIN2B-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Endele S et al. (2010) Mutations in GRIN2A and GRIN2B encoding regulatory subunits of NMDA receptors cause variable neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nature Publishing Group 42, 1021–1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jansen A and Andermann E (2005) Genetics of the polymicrogyria syndromes. Journal of Medical Genetics 42, 369–378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bizzotto S and Francis F (2015) Morphological and functional aspects of progenitors perturbed in cortical malformations. Front Cell Neurosci 9, 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sanz-Clemente A et al. (2013) Diversity in NMDA receptor composition: many regulators, many consequences. Neuroscientist 19, 62–75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mayer S et al. (2019) Multimodal Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Physiological Maturation in the Developing Human Neocortex. Neuron 102, 143–158.e7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turner SJ et al. (2015) GRIN2A: an aptly named gene for speech dysfunction. Neurology 84, 586–593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lemke JR et al. (2016) Delineating the GRIN1phenotypic spectrum. Neurology 86, 2171–2178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dobyns WB (1989) Agenesis of the corpus callosum and gyral malformations are frequent manifestations of nonketotic hyperglycinemia. Neurology 39, 817–820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ogden KK et al. (2017) Molecular Mechanism of Disease-Associated Mutations in the Pre-M1 Helix of NMDA Receptors and Potential Rescue Pharmacology. PLoS Genet 13, e1006536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Choi DW (1988) Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system. Neuron 1, 623–634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hardingham GE and Bading H (2010) Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 11, 682–696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Suzuki M et al. (2006) Glutamate enhances proliferation and neurogenesis in human neural progenitor cell cultures derived from the fetal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci 24, 645–653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rash BG et al. (2016) Bidirectional radial Ca(2+) activity regulates neurogenesis and migration during early cortical column formation. Sci Adv 2, e1501733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yoneyama M et al. (2008) Promotion of neuronal differentiation through activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors transiently expressed by undifferentiated neural progenitor cells in fetal rat neocortex. J. Neurosci. Res 86, 2392–2402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rakic P and Komuro H (1994) The Role of Receptor/Channel Activity in Neuronal Cell Migration. Journal of Neurobiology 26, 299–303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Haydar TF et al. (2000) Differential modulation of proliferation in the neocortical ventricular and subventricular zones. Journal of Neuroscience 20, 5764–5774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gressens P et al. (2000) Neuronal migration disorder in Zellweger mice is secondary to glutamate receptor dysfunction. Annals of Neurology 48, 336–343 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.LoTurco JJ et al. (1995) GABA and glutamate depolarize cortical progenitor cells and inhibit DNA synthesis. Neuron 15, 1287–1298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Luhmann HJ (2015) Control of cortical neuronal migration by glutamate and GABA. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00004/abstract [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Aprea J and Calegari F (2012) Bioelectric State and Cell Cycle Control of Mammalian Neural Stem Cells. Stem Cells International 2012, 1–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Catarino CB et al. (2011) Dravet syndrome as epileptic encephalopathy: evidence from long-term course and neuropathology. Brain 134, 2982–3010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barba C et al. (2014) Co-occurring malformations of cortical development and SCN1A gene mutations. Epilepsia 55, 1009–1019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vanoye CG et al. (2014) Novel SCN3A variants associated with focal epilepsy in children. Neurobiology of Disease 62, 313–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lamar T et al. (2017) SCN3A deficiency associated with increased seizure susceptibility. Neurobiology of Disease 102, 38–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zaman T et al. (2018) Mutations in SCN3A cause early infantile epileptic encephalopathy. Annals of Neurology 83, 703–717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Holland KD et al. (2008) Mutation of sodium channel SCN3A in a patient with cryptogenic pediatric partial epilepsy. Neurosci. Lett 433, 65–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Estacion M et al. (2010) A sodium channel mutation linked to epilepsy increases ramp and persistent current of Nav1.3 and induces hyperexcitability in hippocampal neurons. Experimental Neurology 224, 362–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lossin C et al. (2002) Molecular basis of an inherited epilepsy. Neuron 34, 877–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Albrieux M et al. (2004) Early expression of sodium channel transcripts and sodium current by cajal-retzius cells in the preplate of the embryonic mouse neocortex. J. Neurosci 24, 1719–1725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Catterall WA (2012) Voltage-gated sodium channels at 60: structure, function and pathophysiology. The Journal of Physiology 590, 2577–2589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Spitzer NC (2002) Activity-dependent neuronal differentiation prior to synapse formation: the functions of calcium transients. J. Physiol. Paris 96, 73–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ben-Ari Y and Holmes GL (2006) Effects of seizures on developmental processes in the immature brain. The Lancet Neurology 5, 1055–1063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hamdan FF et al. (2017) High Rate of Recurrent De Novo Mutations in Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies. Am. J. Hum. Genet 101, 664–685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Scheffer IE et al. (2017) ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 58, 512–521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mizrahi EM (1999) Acute and chronic effects of seizures in the developing brain: lessons from clinical experience. Epilepsia 40, S42–50– discussion S64–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schmid R et al. (1999) Effects of neonatal seizures on subsequent seizure-induced brain injury. Neurology 53, 1754–1761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wolff M et al. (2006) Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infants (Dravet Syndrome): Natural History and Neuropsychological Findings. Epilepsia 47, 45–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nabbout R et al. (2013) Encephalopathy in children with Dravet syndrome is not a pure consequence of epilepsy. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 8, 1–1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.McTague A et al. (2013) Migrating partial seizures of infancy: expansion of the electroclinical, radiological and pathological disease spectrum. Brain 136, 1578–1591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Barcia G et al. (2012) De novo gain-of-function KCNT1 channel mutations cause malignant migrating partial seizures of infancy. Nature Publishing Group 44, 1255–1259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wagnon JL and Meisler MH (2015) Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Mutations of SCN8A in Epileptic Encephalopathy. Front Neurol 6, 104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Oyrer J et al. (2018) Ion Channels in Genetic Epilepsy: From Genes and Mechanisms to Disease-Targeted Therapies. Pharmacological Reviews 70, 142–173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Miceli F et al. (2013) Genotype-phenotype correlations in neonatal epilepsies caused by mutations in the voltage sensor of K(v)7.2 potassium channel subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 110, 4386–4391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mullier B et al. (2017) GRIN2B gain of function mutations are sensitive to radiprodil, a negative allosteric modulator of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors. Neuropharmacology 123, 322–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Consortium E et al. (2016) De Novo Mutations in SLC1A2 and CACNA1A Are Important Causes of Epileptic Encephalopathies. AJHG 99, 287–298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Helbig KL et al. (2018) De Novo Pathogenic Variants in CACNA1E Cause Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy with Contractures, Macrocephaly, and Dyskinesias. Am. J. Hum. Genet 103, 666–678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ophoff RA et al. (1996) Familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia type-2 are caused by mutations in the Ca2+ channel gene CACNL1A4. Cell 87, 543–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Splawski I et al. (2004) CaV1.2 Calcium Channel Dysfunction Causes a Multisystem Disorder Including Arrhythmia and Autism. Cell 119, 19–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hull JM and Isom LL (2017) Voltage-gated sodium channel β subunits: The power outside the pore in brain development and disease. Neuropharmacology DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.09.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Brackenbury WJ et al. (2013) Abnormal neuronal patterning occurs during early postnatal brain development of Scn1b-null mice and precedes hyperexcitability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 110, 1089–1094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Patino GA et al. (2009) A functional null mutation of SCN1B in a patient with Dravet syndrome. J. Neurosci 29, 10764–10778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yuan Y et al. (2019) Delayed maturation of GABAergic signaling in the Scn1a and Scn1b mouse models of Dravet Syndrome. Sci Rep DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42191-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sanders SJ et al. (2018) Progress in Understanding and Treating SCN2A-Mediated Disorders. Trends in Neurosciences 41, 442–456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cooper DN et al. (2013) Where genotype is not predictive of phenotype: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of reduced penetrance in human inherited disease. Hum Genet 132, 1077–1130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Vadlamudi L et al. (2010) Timing of de novo mutagenesis--a twin study of sodium-channel mutations. N Engl J Med 363, 1335–1340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miyama S et al. (2008) Monozygotic twins with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy discordant for clinical features. Pediatric Neurology 39, 120–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Veitia RA et al. (2013) Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation. Trends Genet. 29, 385–393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bergren SK et al. (2009) Fine mapping of an epilepsy modifier gene on mouse Chromosome 19. Mamm Genome 20, 359–366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sprunger LK et al. (1999) Dystonia associated with mutation of the neuronal sodium channel Scn8a and identification of the modifier locus Scnm1 on mouse chromosome 3. Human Molecular Genetics 8, 471–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ryan DP and Ptáček LJ (2010) Episodic neurological channelopathies. Neuron 68, 282–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Manuck SB and McCaffery JM (2014) Gene-environment interaction. Annu Rev Psychol 65, 41–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gaily E et al. (2013) Dravet syndrome: new potential genetic modifiers, imaging abnormalities, and ictal findings. Epilepsia 54, 1577–1585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rush AM et al. (2006) A single sodium channel mutation produces hyper- or hypoexcitability in different types of neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 8245–8250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Jiang H et al. (2015) The GluN2B subunit of N-methy-D-asparate receptor regulates the radial migration of cortical neurons in vivo. Brain Research 1610, 20–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bizzotto S et al. (2017) Eml1 loss impairs apical progenitor spindle length and soma shape in the developing cerebral cortex. Sci Rep 7, 17308–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Buchsbaum IY and Cappello S (2019) Neuronal migration in the CNS during development and disease: insights from in vivo and in vitro models. Development 146, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Florio M and Huttner WB (2014) Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. Development 141, 2182–2194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Reillo I et al. (2011) A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 21, 1674–1694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Johnson MB et al. (2018) Aspm knockout ferret reveals an evolutionary mechanism governing cerebral cortical size. Nature 556, 370–375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kawasaki H et al. (2012) Rapid and efficient genetic manipulation of gyrencephalic carnivores using. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Levin M et al. (2017) Endogenous Bioelectric Signaling Networks: Exploiting Voltage Gradients for Control of Growth and Form. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19, 353–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Perathoner S et al. (2014) Bioelectric signaling regulates size in zebrafish fins. PLoS Genet 10, e1004080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Simons C et al. (2015) Mutations in the voltage-gated potassium channel gene KCNH1 cause Temple-Baraitser syndrome and epilepsy. Nature Publishing Group 47, 73–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Masotti A et al. (2015) Keppen-Lubinsky syndrome is caused by mutations in the inwardly rectifying K+ channel encoded by KCNJ6. Am. J. Hum. Genet 96, 295–300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yu Y-C et al. (2012) Preferential electrical coupling regulates neocortical lineage-dependent microcircuit assembly. Nature 486, 113–117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Silbereis JC et al. (2016) The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System. Neuron 89, 248–268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Thompson CH et al. (2012) Nontruncating SCN1A mutations associated with severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy impair cell surface expression. J. Biol. Chem 287, 42001–42008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wolff M et al. (2017) Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity suggest therapeutic implications in SCN2A-related disorders. Brain 140, 1316–1336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Inuzuka LM et al. (2019) Neurodevelopmental disorder associated with de novo SCN3A pathogenic variants: two new cases and review of the literature. Brain Dev DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2019.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Miyatake S et al. (2018) Recurrent SCN3A p.Ile875Thr variant in patients with polymicrogyria. Annals of Neurology 84, 159–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES