In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 3 as published. All exponents were incorrectly shown as positive values when they should have been negative. The corrected Table 3 appears below.
Table 3.
Relative abundance of the three classes of cellulose degrading enzymes based on predictive metagenomics.
| Mixed diet | Wood diet | |
|---|---|---|
| Endoglucanase (EC:3.2.1.4) | 4.01 × 10−4 ± 1.43 × 10−4 | 4.50 × 10−4 ± 8.74 × 10−5 |
| β-Glucosidase (EC:3.2.1.21) | 1.25 × 10−4 ± 9.21 × 10−5 | 2.59 × 10−4 ± 1.90 × 10−4 |
| Cellulose 1,4-β-cellobiosidase (EC:3.2.1.91) | 1.04 × 10−7 ± 2.03 × 10−7 | 6.19 × 10−7 ± 8.98 × 10−7 |
Abundances were calculated using PICRUSt (see methods) and compared across diet type and tissue region.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.