Abstract
Background
Transportation has been suggested as a risk factor for gastric ulceration in horses, but limited evidence supports this assumption.
Animals
Twenty‐six Standardbred, Thoroughbred, and Warmblood mares from a university teaching herd.
Methods
Twelve mares were confined for 12 hours, overnight, in reproductive stocks with indwelling nasogastric tubes (NGTs) to assess pH of gastric fluid (GF). Gastric ulceration was assessed endoscopically before and after confinement. Subsequently, 26 horses were transported for 12 hours, overnight, in 2 consignments. During transportation, GF was aspirated from indwelling NGT placed in the same 12 mares used in the confinement study, and gastric ulceration was assessed endoscopically before and after transportation in all horses.
Results
The median pH of GF in confined horses was 1.70‐2.49 at each sampling point, and there was no apparent effect on gastric squamous ulcer scores. The median pH of GF from the same 12 horses at corresponding sampling times during transportation was 6.82‐7.22. Transportation was associated with increased gastric squamous ulcer scores, particularly in horses fasted for gastroscopy and NGT placement immediately before departure. Gastric emptying appeared delayed after transportation in horses fed before departure.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Transportation is associated with increased gastric squamous ulceration and with increased pH of GF. These findings may be a consequence of impaired gastric emptying and reflux of alkaline small intestinal content, with factors such as duodenal bile salts and short‐chain fatty acids mediating mucosal injury.
Keywords: alkaline reflux, bile salts, equine glandular gastric disease, equine squamous gastric disease, gastric emptying, gastric ulcer syndrome, gastrointestinal motility, volatile fatty acids
Abbreviations
- CK
creatine kinase
- EGGD
equine glandular gastric disease
- ESGD
equine squamous gastric disease
- GF
gastric fluid
- GI
gastrointestinal
- LEL
lower explosive limit
- NGT
nasogastric tube
1. INTRODUCTION
Gastric ulceration is the most common disease condition of the equine stomach1 and is associated with colic, decreased appetite, failure to thrive, and poor performance.2, 3 Equine gastric ulcer syndrome has been recommended as an encompassing term for all erosive and ulcerative conditions of the equine stomach.4 Importantly, however, given likely differences in the pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of diseases of the squamous and glandular gastric mucosa,5, 6 the terms equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD) and equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD) are now preferred.4 The pathogenesis of ESGD is likely related predominantly to increased exposure to highly acidic gastric contents,5 although bile acids and volatile fatty acids also have been implicated in the induction of disease.7, 8, 9 Possible causes of EGGD are less well characterized although, in common with ESGD, it is hypothesized that erosion and ulceration occur as a result of an imbalance between aggressive and protective factors such that mucosal integrity is compromised. In horses, as in people with peptic ulcer disease, factors that decrease prostaglandin production6, 10 and possibly altered gastric microbiota11, 12 may contribute to the development of disease.
Horses travel frequently for performance, breeding, and other purposes. Transportation has been suggested as a risk factor for gastric ulceration13 and a recent survey of transport‐associated health problems indicated that gastrointestinal (GI) problems occur frequently in association with transportation of horses.14 Limited evidence currently is available regarding the effects of transportation on gastric ulceration or gastric pH.
Transportation is associated with factors that may contribute to gastric ulceration such as physiologic stress responses (increased heart rate and serum cortisol concentrations),15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 changes in feeding practices and water consumption,22, 23 and changes in GI microbiota.12, 24 Our study was conducted to determine the impact of 12 hours of transportation without food or water on gastric ulcer scores and gastric fluid (GF) pH in horses. A secondary objective was to determine the effect of pretransport feeding practices on these outcomes. We hypothesized that transportation would be associated with ulceration of the squamous mucosa associated with acidic GF and that these effects would be more severe in horses fasted before transportation.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Animals
Twenty‐six Standardbred (n = 14), Thoroughbred (n = 10), and Warmblood (n = 2) mares were included in the study. Mean age was 9.9 years (range, 4‐20 years), and mean body weight was 518.8 kg (range, 416‐658 kg). All horses were Charles Sturt University teaching or research horses and had been resident on site for ≥4 weeks. Prior transport history was unknown for each horse, although all had been transported on at least 1 prior occasion.
2.2. Experimental design
The study was conducted in 2 parts. Part 1 was conducted as a preliminary observational study to assess the effect of overnight confinement (1800‐0600 hours), without feeding, on gastric pH and gastric ulcer scores in 12 mares. Part 2 was conducted as an interventional study to determine the effect of overnight (1800‐0600 hours) transportation on gastric pH and gastric ulcer scores in 26 mares. Feed management before transportation consisted of feeding <60 minutes before departure (group 1, n = 7), feeding 6 hours before departure (group 2, n = 7) and fasting for 12 hours for gastroscopy and nasogastric tube (NGT) placement immediately before departure for the 12 mares used in study part 1. Study design is presented in Table 1, with further detail provided in Data S1 (Figure S1).
Table 1.
Treatment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Part 1 (confinement) | Day 1 | Day 2 | |
Horses | Horses | T0: Fasted 12 hours, gastroscopy, NGT; confine 12 hours | |
H1‐H6 (n = 6) | H14‐H19 (n = 6) | T1: Repeat gastroscopy, remove NGT | |
NGT | NGT | T3: (60 hours) Repeat gastroscopy | |
Part 2 (transport) | Trip 1 | Trip 2 | |
Day 15 | Day 16 | ||
Horses | Horses | T0: Fasted 12 hours, gastroscopy, NGT; transport 12 hours | |
H1‐H6 (n = 6) | H14‐H19 (n = 6) | T1: Repeat gastroscopy, remove NGT | |
NGT | NGT | T3: (60 hours) Repeat gastroscopy | |
H7‐H13 (n = 7) Group 1 |
H20‐H26 (n = 7) Group 2 |
T‐1: Gastroscopy 24 hours before transport Fed 1 hour pretransport (group 1, trip 1) Fed 6 hours pretransport (group 2, trip 2) Transport 12 hours T1: Repeat gastroscopy T3: (60 hours) Repeat gastroscopy |
|
Age (years; mean, SD) | 9.6 ± 4.2 | 7.4 ± 3.8 | |
Body weight (kg; mean, SD) | 542.8 ± 77.7 | 548.2 ± 53.1 |
Abbreviation: NGT, nasogastric tube.
2.2.1. Part 1
Mares (n = 12) were confined in reproductive stocks (150 × 71 cm; height of front gate, 122 cm) as 2 groups, each of 6 horses, on consecutive nights. Horses were fed alfalfa hay (1%‐1.5% body weight) between 0600 and 0700 hours on the morning of confinement. Water was withheld from 1200 hours. Each horse underwent veterinary clinical examination and venous blood was collected for hematology, serum biochemistry, and blood gas analysis at 1400 hours, 4 hours before confinement (T0). Intestinal borborygmi were graded subjectively by one investigator (B.P.) based on auscultation of 4 abdominal quadrants (upper left, lower left, upper right, lower right) and recorded as 0 (no intestinal sounds auscultated in 60 seconds), 1 (decreased activity), 2 (normal activity, 2 or 3 discrete rumbling or gurgling noises in 30s), or 3 (increased activity) for each quadrant. These results were summed to give a GI activity score, as previously described.19 Horses were sedated (200 mg xylazine and 10 mg acetylpromazine, or 10 mg detomidine and 5 mg butorphanol IV) between 1600 and 1800 hours for gastroscopy and placement of an indwelling NGT (Veterinary Enteral Feeding Tube, 18 French × 250 cm; Mila International, Erlanger, Kentucky) and aspiration of GF. During confinement (1800‐0600 hours), horses were monitored continuously but were not offered food or water. GF was aspirated from the NGT every 2 hours. Clinical examination and venous blood collection were repeated at the end of confinement at 0600 hours the next day (T1), and after 8 hours (T2), and 60 hours (T3). Gastroscopy was performed at T1 and T3, with horses fasted for gastroscopy at T3 as before T0.
2.2.2. Part 2
Effects of transportation were assessed in 26 horses transported as 2 consignments, each of 13 horses, on consecutive nights (trips 1 and 2, Table 1), completed 14 days after study part 1. Both trips were completed over an identical route covering approximately 880 km, with the same driver and vehicle, departing at 1800 hours and returning at 0600 hours the following morning. The transport vehicle was a 15‐horse trailer attached to a prime mover (LF290 18T, DAF Trucks Australia, Bayswater, Victoria, Australia). On each journey, 6 of the 12 horses used in part 1 of the study traveled in 6 bays, located at the back of the truck, which could be accessed continuously throughout the journey to permit aspiration of GF as during part 1 of the study. The remaining 7 horses were transported in compartments of the truck that could not be accessed during the journey. Horses traveling with NGT were fed between 0600 and 0700 hours on the morning of transportation, as before confinement in part 1. Water was removed at 1200 hours, with placement of the NGT during gastroscopic examination and aspiration of GF between 1600 and 1800 hours, as during part 1. Gastroscopy was performed on the 7 horses transported without NGT on the day before transportation, approximately 24 hours before departure (T‐1). Results from T‐1 were pooled with results from T0 for analysis of all pretransportation observations. Horses traveling without NGT were fed 2.5 kg of alfalfa hay within 1 hour of departure for trip 1 (horses 7‐13), or 6 hours before departure for trip 2 (horses 20‐27).
Clinical examination and venous blood collection were performed as in part 1 within 4 hours of departure and before sedation for gastroscopy and NGT placement (n = 12). Horses were monitored continuously during transit by video camera, with researchers (B.P., G.D.) traveling in the vehicle with access to the 6 horses with NGT during both trips. GF was collected every 2 hours from these horses. Clinical examination and venous blood collection were repeated for all horses at the end of transportation (T1), and after 8 hours (T2) and 60 hours (T3). Gastroscopy was repeated (n = 26) at T1 and T3, with horses fasted for gastroscopy at T3 as before T‐1 or T0.
2.3. Gastroscopy and GF pH determination
Endoscopic evaluation of the gastric mucosa was performed using a 3‐m endoscope (9 mm outer diameter, Olympus Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), as previously described,25 after insufflation of the stomach with air to permit complete visualization of the glandular and squamous gastric mucosa. Each horse's stomach was assessed using a validated equine scoring system26 with separate scores for the greater curvature, lesser curvature and fundus summed to give a squamous score, and separate scores similarly summed for fundic and pyloric glandular mucosa, as previously described.25 Gastroscopy examinations were video recorded and stored using a unique, randomly generated, 4‐digit identification number. Gastroscopy findings were scored in real time by 1 author (S.L.R.) and on review of deidentified video recordings by a second author (G.D.) blinded to time of sampling. Because findings were consistent for both methods of evaluation, real‐time results were analyzed because videos were missing or of inadequate quality for 11 examinations. Feed management before transportation influenced the amount of feed in the stomach at T1 (immediately after transportation). Consequently, on review of deidentified gastroscopy videos, gastric emptying was graded subjectively according to a scale developed as part of concurrent studies (Table 2).
Table 2.
Score | Description | Representative appearance | Endoscopic appearance |
---|---|---|---|
0 |
No retained gastric content, all glandular mucosa readily visualized |
||
1 | Liquid content—glandular mucosa partly obscured by liquid content only | ||
2 | Slurry, no formed elements; glandular mucosa partly obscured by liquid with obvious particulate matter in suspension | ||
3 | Feed material coalesced within the liquid slurry to form an “island” that is visible above the liquid horizon; glandular mucosa can be visualized with distension | ||
4 | Feed material as a formed ball within the gastric lumen with minimal free fluid; glandular mucosa can be adequately visualized with distension and persistence | ||
5 | Large, solid feed ball in gastric lumen obstructing adequate visualization of glandular mucosa ± lesser curvature despite distension |
Gastric fluid was aspirated via the endoscope at the completion of mucosal scoring. Indwelling NGT were then placed by grasping a small piece of tape at the distal end of the NGT using endoscopic biopsy forceps and passing the 3‐m endoscope and NGT into the stomach, as previously described.25 GF (1‐10 mL) was aspirated every 2 hours via the NGT. Fluid was placed immediately into 50‐mL polypropylene containers, and pH was determined within 15 minutes of collection using a hand‐held pH meter (220 Portable, Temperature Calibrated pH/mV Meter; Instrument Choice, trading as Synotronics Pty Ltd, Regency Park, South Australia, Australia; pH range, 1‐14; 0.1 pH resolution; 0.2 pH accuracy). The probe was calibrated and verified against standard solutions of pH 7, 4, and 1 before sample analysis to ensure pH readings were within 0.1 of the expected pH for each standard solution.
2.4. Environmental parameters and air quality
During transportation, temperature (°C), humidity (%), heat index (°C), and wind speed (m/s) were monitored continuously using 3 weather trackers (Kestrel: 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker, Nielsen‐Kellerman, Boothwyn, Pennsylvania). The concentration of oxygen (O2, vol %), ammonia (NH3, ppm), hydrogen sulfide (H2S, ppm), carbon monoxide (CO, ppm), and methane (CH4, % of lower explosive limit [LEL]) were monitored by 3 gas detectors (Dräger X‐am 5000, Serial Number: ARFB0560, Dräger Safety AG & Co., Lübeck, Germany). Gas and weather trackers were fixed to the roof of the truck in each section of the trailer.
2.5. Hematology and serum biochemistry
Routine hematology parameters were determined using an automated cell counter analyzer (Cell Dyn 3700; Abbott, Chicago, IL). Total protein and albumin concentrations and creatine kinase (CK) and aspartate aminotransferase activities were measured in heparinized plasma samples using the Konelab 20XT photometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Finland, Europe). Plasma fibrinogen concentration was calculated by heat precipitation.27 Ionized sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca2+), glucose, and lactate concentrations were measured in heparinized whole blood using a blood gas analyzer (Gem Premier 3500; Diamond Diagnostic, Holliston, Massachusetts). Plasma cortisol concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay using the ImmunChem Cortisol 125 kit (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Orangenburb, New York).
2.6. Statistical analyses
Power analysis before the study and based on previous work conducted by our group suggested that 6 horses (the minimum subset of horses in the experimental design described above) afforded satisfactory power (>0.8, α = .05) to discriminate minimum differences in mean results for CK of 16.5 IU/L, cortisol of 0.5 mmol/L, and gastric pH of 2.2, assuming SD of 9.9 IU/L, 0.3 mmol/L, and 1.3 respectively. All data were evaluated initially using summary statistics. Differences between hematological and serum biochemistry parameters were compared by 2‐way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after testing for normality using the D'Agostino and Pearson test. Where possible, nonparametric results were log‐transformed before analysis, or nonparametric tests were used. The effect of time of collection on pH of aspirated GF during confinement and transportation was determined by separate 1‐way ANOVA on ranks (Friedman test), with post hoc testing using Dunn's multiple pairwise comparisons. Comparisons between samples obtained from confined and transported horses were performed on log‐transformed data by 2‐way ANOVA with time, treatment and their interaction as fixed effects. During confinement and transportation, summed gastric ulcer scores were compared using Friedman and Dunn's tests. Comparisons between results from confined and transported horses at T0, T1, and T3 were made using separate Mann‐Whitney tests. The effects of time of feeding before departure on gastric feed retention score and on summed gastric ulcer scores were determined using the Kruskal‐Wallis test. For all statistical analyses, a P value of <.05 was used to indicate significance, and all analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, http://www.graphpad.com).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Transportation
Noxious gases (H2S, CO, and CH4) remained below limits of detection (2 ppm, 2 ppm, and 1% LEL, respectively) at all times and in all locations during both trips. Oxygen was stable at 20.9% for the duration of both transport events. Ambient temperature ranged from 18.5°C to 5.8°C, relative humidity from 54% to 89% and wind speed from 0 to 2.5 m/s during trip 1, and from 14.5°C to 6.0°C, 59%‐85% and 0‐1.5 m/s, respectively, during trip 2; these results were consistent with meteorological observations for Wagga Wagga on the evenings when horses were confined (minimum temperatures of 8.1°C and 5.0°C).
All horses traveled well, with no clinical signs of injury or illness attributable to transportation. Transient, but significant (P < .001), increases in heart rate and rectal temperature were observed at T1, immediately on arrival for transported horses, but not observed at the corresponding time for horses during confinement only (Figure S1). Mean rectal temperature still was increased at T2, 8 hours after return, for transported horses. Body weight and respiratory rate showed no changes attributable to transportation or confinement. Abdominal auscultation identified decreased GI sounds at each examination after transportation (Figure 1), but no changes were observed in confined horses. Both transportation and confinement were associated with transient increases in plasma cortisol concentrations (Figure 2). Transportation was associated with increased white cell and neutrophil counts, and these changes were not observed in horses in association with confinement (Figure S2). A significant difference (P = .04) was evident for red cell count for transported horses in comparison with results during confinement, but pairwise comparisons were not significant. Transportation, but not confinement, was associated with increased plasma activity of CK, and plasma concentrations of protein, albumin, sodium, ionized calcium, lactate, and glucose (Figures S3‐S5). Plasma potassium concentrations varied with both transportation and confinement (Figure S4).
3.2. Effect of confinement on gastric ulceration and pH
Median pH of aspirated GF was 2.43 (range, 1.31‐6.65) before confinement. Results obtained from samples aspirated during confinement ranged from 1.27 to 6.80, with median values between 1.70 and 2.49 at each sampling point. No significant effect of time was observed on median pH of aspirated GF during confinement (P = .39, Figure 3). GF pH remained <4 overnight for most horses (Figure 3).
Gastric emptying was satisfactory to permit full evaluation of squamous and glandular mucosa in all horses at T0 (before confinement), T1 (after 12 hours of confinement without feeding), and at T3 (60h after confinement). Summed gastric squamous ulcer scores ranged from 0 to 5 at T0, before confinement (median, 0), and increased by 1‐4 during confinement for 6 (of 12) horses (Figure 4). Two horses had grade 3 lesions of the lesser curvature after confinement, however summed squamous scores (median, 1; range, 0‐6) were not significantly affected by confinement (P = .08, Figure 4). A modest increase in median glandular score was observed at T3 (median, 2; range, 0‐4), compared to median glandular score at T0 (median, 1; range, 0‐4), but all lesions were mild (≤2) in the glandular mucosa of the fundus or pyloric antrum (Figure 4).
3.3. Effect of transportation on gastric ulceration and pH
Attempts were made to aspirate GF through the endoscope before departure (T0, n = 12) or on the day before transportation (T‐1, n = 14), and from all horses on return after transportation (T1, n = 26). Median pH of GF before transportation was 4.00 (range, 1.67‐6.67; n = 24); after transportation the median pH of endoscopically collected GF was 3.04 (range, 2.03‐7.33; n = 20). Endoscopic aspiration of GF was not possible from horses with substantial amounts of feed retained in their stomachs (feed retention of grades 3‐4), including 6 of 7 horses fed immediately (<1 hour) before departure. No significant difference was found in median pH of endoscopically aspirated GF from horses after transportation in comparison with results obtained before departure (P = .55).
Median pH of samples aspirated before departure from horses with indwelling NGT was 4.00 (range, 1.48‐6.88; n = 12). Median pH of GF samples aspirated during transportation was between 6.82 and 7.22, significantly higher than before transportation (P < .001, Figure 3). Comparison of log transformed results indicated that the pH of aspirated GF from transported horses at 2200 hours (P = .001), 2400 hours (P = .007), 0200 hours (P < .001), 0400 hours (P < .001), and 0600 hours (P = .015) was significantly increased when compared with corresponding results obtained during confinement. Median pH (6.83; range, 2.19‐7.33; n = 12) was increased on return for these horses, but a number of individual samples had much lower values at this time (Figure 3).
Gastric emptying was satisfactory to permit evaluation of squamous and glandular mucosa in all horses at T‐1 or T0 (before departure) and at T3 (60h after transportation). However, gastric feed retention at T1 (immediately after transportation) varied according to the time of feeding before departure (Figure 5), with horses fed immediately (1 hour) or 6 hours before transportation having significantly more ingesta retained in their stomachs. Glandular fundic mucosa was partially obscured for some group 1 horses (fed <1 hour before departure) at T1.
Summed gastric squamous ulcer scores ranged from 0 to 6 (median, 0) in horses before transportation (n = 26), and were higher after transportation for 15 (of 26 horses), including 10 (of 12) horses with indwelling NGT. Median squamous ulcer score was significantly (P < .001) higher after transportation (Figure 4). Severe ulceration (grade 4) was evident at the margo plicatus (greater and lesser curvatures) and extending to involve the fundic squamous mucosa in some horses after transportation (Figure 6), and appeared to be associated with contact between GF and the squamous mucosa, as evidenced by particulate content and bile staining of the mucosa in affected horses. Subjectively, the severity of squamous ulceration appeared to be inversely related to the amount of feed within the stomach during transportation, whereby more marked feed retention was associated with less ulceration (Figure 7). Transportation or feeding did not affect summed scores for the glandular mucosa.
Squamous ulcer scores improved spontaneously for 12 horses by T3, but 6 horses had increased ulcer scores at this time compared to T1. The majority of fundic squamous lesions had improved dramatically without treatment, but lesions of the lesser curvature had not resolved for many horses, and 9 (of 26) horses were treated with omeprazole (1 mg/kg PO q24h for 7 days; Gastrozol Daily Oral Paste for Horses; Virbac [Australia] Pty Ltd, Milperra, New South Wales, Australia) on completion of the study to ensure resolution of squamous lesions of ≥3 grade severity in ≥1 locations (Supplementary data, Figure S6).
4. DISCUSSION
We evaluated the effect of transportation on gastric ulceration and pH of GF in horses. In part 1, a preliminary study was conducted in which horses were subjected to confinement, sampling and gastroscopy procedures that mimicked those experienced during transportation. Transported horses had well‐characterized clinical, hematological, and blood biochemistry changes reported after transportation in previous studies,16, 19, 20, 28, 29, 30, 31 and these changes were not observed in horses confined for a similar duration. Plasma cortisol concentrations increased in transported horses, as has been reported previously.19, 21, 32, 33 However, study design may have prevented discrimination of effects of transportation on cortisol because confinement was associated with a similar increase in plasma cortisol concentration and these results might reflect expected diurnal variations.34, 35 Indeed, observed changes were remarkably consistent with diurnal changes in plasma cortisol concentration reported previously.35
Our findings suggest that transportation of 12 hours without feeding may contribute to the development of ESGD because travel induced or exacerbated ulceration of the squamous mucosa in the majority of horses and was associated with a significant increase in squamous ulcer scores, particularly in horses fasted for 12 hours before transportation. To our knowledge, development of gastric squamous ulcers in such a short time frame (12 hours) has not been reported previously in horses. Squamous epithelial lesions in transported horses were associated with increased pH of GF (median values of 6.8‐7.2) in horses where indwelling NGT permitted aspiration of GF throughout the journey, a finding contradictory to our research hypothesis, which postulated that prolonged exposure to gastric acid might contribute to ESGD. During confinement, horses had GF of low pH for the duration of study part 1 (median values of 1.7‐2.49), as expected, and these horses did not have increased gastric squamous ulcer scores. Partitioning of gastric content may influence pH determination in horses,36, 37 but gastric emptying was similarly complete for horses with indwelling NGT after both confinement and transportation (T1). In the nearly complete absence of retained ingesta, aspiration of GF through the NGT and endoscope was relatively simple, and no differences were observed between samples obtained simultaneously via either NGT or endoscope, including endoscopically observed aspiration through the NGT, suggesting no partitioning of gastric content occurred. Divergent findings in confined and transported horses suggest that the observed effects on gastric pH cannot be attributed to the NGT.
Because the fundic squamous mucosa was discolored and had residual feed particles adherent after transportation in many horses, it was assumed that contact with GF contributed to mucosal damage. Lesions extending into the squamous mucosa from the margo plicatus are uncommon in spontaneous disease.38 These observations contradict a recent review emphazing the role of HCl as the dominant erosive agent in the development of ESGD5 and suggest that less acidic factors, such as short‐chain fatty acids8, 9 and duodenal bile salts,7 are important contributors to mucosal damage in some circumstances. Reflux of alkaline small intestinal content is observed commonly during gastroscopic examination, and samples obtained from NGT in our study were typically yellow, consistent with bile content. These observations are important because gastric ulcer prophylaxis before transportation using proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole39 will not be effective if gastric acid is not mediating mucosal injury.
Increased pH was not identified in endoscopically derived GF samples in our study from horses fed before departure. Because endoscopic examination of 13 horses took approximately 90‐120 minutes to complete, and horses with NGT were sampled first, this observation was attributed to rapid return of gastric function after transportation, as was apparent on assessment of individual results from horses transported with NGT (Figure 3). Alternatively, retention of feed within the gastric lumen could have stimulated continued secretion of gastric acid in horses fed within 1 or 6 hours of departure.
Feed management before transportation affected gastric content observed in horses after transportation and appeared to influence the severity of squamous ulceration observed at this time, with an incremental effect on squamous ulcer scores associated with increased time between feeding and departure. The presence of feed in the stomach may be protective against the development of ESGD,40 by absorbing gastric secretions or duodenal reflux, and minimizing contact between the squamous mucosa and liquid content. Horses fasted for 12 hours before departure for gastroscopy and NGT placement had complete gastric emptying after transport with moderate amounts of liquid gastric content, whereas horses fed 6 hours before departure (group 2) or within 1 hour (group 1) of departure had incrementally more ingesta within their stomachs after transportation and small volumes of GF in the most central part of the glandular fundus only. Assuming transported horses were fasted at least 12 hours (group 1, fed <1 hour before departure) and up to 18 hours (group 2, fed 6 hours before departure), this observation suggests decreased gastric emptying relative to our observations at T0 and T3, when all horses had complete gastric emptying after 12 hours fasting. Abdominal auscultation also suggested decreased GI motility in transported horses, as has been reported previously,19 but decreased GI motility was not observed after confinement. Decreased GI motility is consistent with well‐characterized sympathoadrenal neuroendocrine responses to transportation16, 21, 33 and GI problems, notably colic and colitis, are commonly associated with transportation of horses.14, 41, 42 Road transportation has been recently determined to influence fecal microbiome43 and metabolic responses to diet and exercise.44 Together these findings suggest that transportation may predispose to GI disease by affecting GI motility. Further study is required to better characterize this effect, and to determine optimal feeding strategies before and during transportation.
Although treatment with omeprazole is unlikely to have prevented development of gastric ulceration in our study, several horses required omeprazole treatment to ensure resolution of ESGD, with lesions of the lesser curvature seemingly more refractive to healing, as has been reported previously.45 Lesions of the greater curvature and fundus, areas that are unlikely to experience ongoing contact with acidic gastric content after transportation, appeared to heal rapidly when horses were kept on pasture between T1 and T3 in our study. No effect of transportation, feeding or confinement was observed on glandular ulcer scores in our study.
Limitations of our study relate to the need to manipulate feeding practices before departure in order to place NGT for sampling of gastric content during transportation. For this reason, and because of limited access to some compartments of the transport vehicle during travel, aspiration of GF during the journey was possible for only 12 horses. However, this number was approximately twice the required number based on power analysis, and a clear effect of transportation, relative to confinement, was observed in horses with NGT. The study design also allowed assessment of changes in horses after different feeding practices and without the presence of the NGT. Although the macroscopic appearance of aspirated GF was consistent with refluxed small intestinal content, and changes were not observed in horses confined with indwelling NGT, we cannot definitively exclude the possibility that the NGT influenced GF pH, for example by stimulating excessive salivation. Further studies therefore are required to determine the generalizability of these findings, and to assess the effects of other management strategies, such as provision of water during transportation. Our findings suggest that the pH of GF might rapidly decrease on cessation of transportation, and future studies should control for delayed aspiration of GF at the end of transportation. It was not possible to randomize the order of treatment (confinement or transportation) in horses fitted with indwelling NGT, nor to randomize feeding before transportation (all group 1 horses were allocated to trip 1, and all group 2 horses to trip 2). Subjective grading of gastric ulcer scores, gastric feed retention and abdominal auscultation are inherent limitations of our study. The validity of endoscopic findings was protected by evaluation of deidentified video recordings, but assessors were not blinded during assessment of GI motility when completing physical examination of horses. Feed retention limited visualization of fundic glandular mucosa for some horses, although squamous and pyloric mucosa was satisfactorily visualized. The study was not specifically designed to evaluate the effect of transportation on GI motility, and effects of confinement on gastric emptying were indirectly assessed, without variation of feeding practices before confinement. Further studies are warranted therefore to better characterize possible effects of transportation on GI motility.
To our knowledge, our study is the first to unequivocally identify gastric ulceration associated with transportation of fasted horses, and therefore to support transportation as a risk factor for the development of ESGD. To our knowledge, rapid development (within 12 hours) of squamous ulceration has not been reported previously. The severity of changes, particularly in horses fasted before travel, suggests that horses should have access to feed until the time of departure, and potentially during transport, to limit contact between the squamous mucosa and gastric secretions or small intestinal reflux. Unexpectedly, gastric ulceration was associated with increased pH of GF during transportation, consequently the administration of proton pump inhibitors or histamine receptor antagonists to horses before transportation cannot be supported based on our findings. Although spontaneous recovery occurred in a number of horses, 9 (of 26) horses were treated with omeprazole after completion of the study, primarily to ensure healing of ulcerative lesions of the squamous mucosa at the lesser curvature. Study findings suggested that GI motility was decreased during transportation, but further studies are warranted to better characterize possible effects of transportation on GI motility, to ascertain whether our findings in mares are generalizable also to male horses and to determine whether feeding before departure is protective against development of gastric ulceration.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION
Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION
This project was approved by the Charles Sturt University Animal Care and Ethics Committee (approval number A17011).
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by donations from Virbac Pty Ltd and the World Horse Welfare Organization. Goldners Horse Transport provided the truck and driver used in this study, and Austvet Endoscopy provided a 3‐m endoscope for gastroscopy during the study. Kim Heasman performed cortisol assays. The authors thank Ruby Costello, Zali Clark, Martina Sardo, Fauve Buckley, Lexi Burgemeestre, Rhys Powell, and Paloma Ivanyi for assistance with the care of horses, and Drs Surita du Preez, Edwina Wilkes, and Meredith Platt for assistance with gastroscopy.
Padalino B, Davis GL, Raidal SL. Effects of transportation on gastric pH and gastric ulceration in mares. J Vet Intern Med. 2020;34:922–932. 10.1111/jvim.15698
Funding information J.G. Goldner Pty Ltd (Goldners Horse Transport), Ingleburn, New South Wales, Australia, in kind support (supply of truck and driver); Virbac (Australia), Milperra, NSW, Grant/Award Number: private donation; World Horse Welfare Organisation, Blackpool, United Kingdom, Grant/Award Number: donation
REFERENCES
- 1. Sykes BW, Jokisalo JM. Rethinking equine gastric ulcer syndrome: part 1—terminology, clinical signs and diagnosis. Equine Vet Educat. 2014;26:543‐547. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bach N, Ramseyer A, Gerber V, Venner M. Lesions of the gastric mucosa in adult horses of different disciplines: a review. Pferdeheilkunde. 2013;29:430‐442. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Begg LM, O'Sullivan CB. The prevalence and distribution of gastric ulceration in 345 racehorses. Aust Vet J. 2003;81:199‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sykes BW, Hewetson M, Hepburn RJ, Luthersson N, Tamzali Y. European College of Equine Internal Medicine Consensus Statement—equine gastric ulcer syndrome in adult horses. Journal Vet Intern Med. 2015;29:1288‐1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sykes BW, Jokisalo JM. Rethinking equine gastric ulcer syndrome: part 2—equine squamous gastric ulcer syndrome (ESGUS). Equine Vet Educat. 2015;27:264‐268. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sykes B, Jokisalo JM. Rethinking equine gastric ulcer syndrome: part 3—equine glandular gastric ulcer syndrome (EGGUS). Equine Vet Educat. 2015;27:372‐375. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Berschneider HM, Blikslager AT, Roberts MC. Role of duodenal reflux in nonglandular gastric ulcer disease of the mature horse. Equine Vet J. 1999;29:24‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nadeau JA, Andrews FM, Patton CS, Argenzio RA, Mathew AG, Saxton AM. Effects of hydrochloric, valeric, and other volatile fatty acids on pathogenesis of ulcers in the nonglandular portion of the stomach of horses. Am J Vet Res. 2003;64:413‐417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nadeau JA, Andrews FM, Patton CS, Argenzio RA, Mathew AG, Saxton AM. Effects of hydrochloric, acetic, butyric, and propionic acids on pathogenesis of ulcers in the nonglandular portion of the stomach of horses. Am J Vet Res. 2003;64:404‐412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Takeuchi K, Amagase K. Roles of cyclooxygenase, prostaglandin E2 and EP receptors in mucosal protection and ulcer healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Pharm des. 2018;24:2002‐2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dong HJ, Ho H, Hwang H, et al. Diversity of the gastric microbiota in thoroughbred racehorses having gastric ulcer. J Micro Biotech. 2016;26:763‐774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Perry E, Cross TWL, Francis JM, Holscher HD, Clark SD, Swanson KS. Effect of road transport on the equine cecal microbiota. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;68:12‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. McClure SR, Carithers DS, Gross SJ, Murray MJ. Gastric ulcer development in horses in a simulated show or training environment. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;227:775‐777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, et al. Risk factors in equine transport‐related health problems: a survey of the Australian equine industry. Equine Vet J. 2017;49:507‐511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fazio E, Medica P, Cravana C, Ferlazzo A. Pituitary‐adrenocortical adjustments to transport stress in horses with previous different handling and transport conditions. Vet World. 2016;9:856‐861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Medica P, Bruschetta G, Cravana C, Ferlazzo A, Fazio E. Effect of transportation on the sympatho‐adrenal system responses in horses. Res Vet Sci. 2019;125:401‐404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Medica P, Giacoppo E, Fazio E, Aveni F, Pellizzotto R, Ferlazzo A. Cortisol and haematochemical variables of horses during a two day trekking event: effects of preliminary transport. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2010;42:167‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Munsters CC, de Gooijer JW, van den Broek J, van Oldruitenborgh‐Oosterbaan MM. Heart rate, heart rate variability and behaviour of horses during air transport. Vet Rec. 2013;172:15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Carter N, et al. Immunological, clinical, haematological and oxidative responses to long distance transportation in horses. Res Vet Sci. 2017;115:78‐87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Knight P, Celi P, Jeffcott L, Muscatello G. Behaviour during transportation predicts stress response and lower airway contamination in horses. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Schmidt A, Hodl S, Mostl E, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release, heart rate, and heart rate variability in transport‐naive horses during repeated road transport. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2010;39:205‐213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Friend TH. Dehydration, stress, and water consumption of horses during long‐distance commercial transport. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:2568‐2580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. van den Berg JS, Guthrie AJ, Meintjes RA, et al. Water and electrolyte intake and output in conditioned Thoroughbred horses transported by road. Equine Vet J. 1998;30:316‐323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schoster A, Mosing M, Jalali M, Staempfli HR, Weese JS. Effects of transport, fasting and anaesthesia on the faecal microbiota of healthy adult horses. Equine Vet J. 2016;48:595‐602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Raidal SL, Andrews FM, Nielsen SG, Trope G. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of two omeprazole formulations on stomach pH and gastric ulcer scores. Equine Vet J. 2017;49:802‐809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Andrews FM, Sifferman RL, Bernard W, et al. Efficacy of omeprazole paste in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers in horses. Equine Vet J Suppl. 1999;31:81‐86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Millar HR, Simpson JG, Stalker AL. An evaluation of the heat precipitation method for plasma fibrinogen estimation. J Clin Pathol. 1971;24:827‐830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ohmura H, Hobo S, Hiraga A, Jones JH. Changes in heart rate and heart rate variability during transportation of horses by road and air. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73:515‐521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Raidal SL, Bailey GD, Love DN. Effect of transportation on lower respiratory tract contamination and peripheral blood neutrophil function. Aust Vet J. 1997;75:433‐438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Smith BL, Jones JH, Hornof WJ, Miles JA, Longworth KE, Willits NH. Effects of road transport on indices of stress in horses. Equine Vet J. 1996;28:446‐454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Waran NK, Robertson V, Cuddeford D, Kokoszko A, Marlin DJ. Effects of transporting horses facing either forwards or backwards on their behaviour and heart rate. Vet Rec. 1996;139:7‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Stull CL, Rodiek AV. Physiological responses of horses to 24 hours of transportation using a commercial van during summer conditions. J Anim Sci. 2000;78:1458‐1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Schmidt A, Mostl E, Wehnert C, Aurich J, Müller J, Aurich C. Cortisol release and heart rate variability in horses during road transport. Horm Behav. 2010;57:209‐215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cordero M, Brorsen BW, McFarlane D. Circadian and circannual rhythms of cortisol, ACTH, and alpha‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone in healthy horses. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2012;43(4):317‐324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Larsson M, Edqvist LE, Ekman L, Persson S. Plasma cortisol in the horse, diurnal rhythm and effects of exogenous ACTH. Acta Vet Scand. 1979;20:16‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Andrews FM, Frank N, Sommardahl CS, Buchanan BR, Elliott SB, Allen VA. Effects of intravenously administrated omeprazole on gastric juice pH and gastric ulcer scores in adult horses. J Vet Int Med. 2006;20:1202‐1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Baker SJ, Gerring EL. Technique for prolonged minimally invasive monitoring of intragastric pH in ponies. Am J Vet Res. 1993;54:1725‐1734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Andrews FM, Nadeau JA. Clinical syndromes of gastric ulceration in foals and mature horses. Equine Vet J Suppl. 1999;Supp 29:30‐33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Mason LV, Moroney JR, Mason RJ. Prophylactic therapy with omeprazole for prevention of equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) in horses in active training: a meta‐analysis. Equine Vet J. 2018;51(1):11‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Husted L, Sanchez LC, Olsen SN, Baptiste KE, Merritt AM. Effect of paddock vs stall housing on 24 hour gastric pH within the proximal and ventral equine stomach. Equine Vet J. 2008;40:337‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, et al. Survey of horse transportation in Australia: issues and practices. Aust Vet J. 2016;94:349‐357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Padalino B, Raidal SL, Hall E, et al. A survey on transport management practices associated with injuries and health problems in horses. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0162371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Faubladier C, Chaucheyras‐Durand F, da Veiga L, Julliand V. Effect of transportation on fecal bacterial communities and fermentative activities in horses: impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I‐1077 supplementation. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1736‐1744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Connysson M, Muhonen S, Jansson A. Road transport and diet affect metabolic response to exercise in horses. J Anim Sci. 2017;95:4869‐4879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Furr MO, Murray MJ. Treatment of gastric ulcers in horses with histamine type‐2 receptor antagonists. Equine Vet J. 1989;21(Suppl 7):77‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.