Skip to main content
BioResearch Open Access logoLink to BioResearch Open Access
. 2020 Mar 12;9(1):64–72. doi: 10.1089/biores.2019.0028

Antioxidant Properties and Redox-Modulating Activity of Chitosan and Its Derivatives: Biomaterials with Application in Cancer Therapy

Donika G Ivanova 1,*, Zvezdelina L Yaneva 1
PMCID: PMC7097683  PMID: 32219012

Abstract

Many studies have shown that mitochondrial metabolism has a fundamental role in induction of carcinogenesis due to the influence of increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in all steps of oncogene transformation and cancer progression. It is widely accepted that the anticancer effect of conventional anticancer drugs is due to induction of oxidative stress and elevated intracellular levels of ROS, which alter the redox homeostasis of cancer cells. On the other hand, the harmful side effects of conventional anticancer chemotherapeutics are also due to increased production of ROS and disruption of redox homeostasis of normal cells and tissues. Therefore, there is a growing interest toward the development of natural antioxidant compounds from various sources, which could impact the redox state of cancer and normal cells by different pathways and could prevent damage from oxidant-mediated reactions. It is known that chitosan exhibits versatile biological properties, including biodegradability, biocompatibility, and a less toxic nature. Because of its antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and immunostimulatory activities, the biopolymer has been used in a wide variety of pharmaceutical, biomedical, food industry, health, and agricultural applications and has been classified as a new physiologically bioactive material.

Keywords: cancer, chitosan, natural products, reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Introduction

Normally in the cells, due to their metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical, hydroperoxyl radical, and hydrogenperoxide, have been produced.1 ROS are generated in mitochondrion, during mitochondrial electron transport in the electron-transport chain,1–4 by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent oxidase4,5 and by existing enzyme processes such as activation of cytochrome P450,1,6 xanthine oxidase,1,7,8 as well as other intracellular sources. The level of physiologically generated ROS is controlled by enzymatic and nonenzymatic intracellular antioxidant systems, which are connected with different functional pathways.8,9 The cellular oxidative stress is a result of redox imbalance due to enhancement of ROS or suppression and crash of antioxidant systems.1,8–10

Overproduction of ROS could be also initiated by extracellular sources such as sunlight, ultraviolet light, chemical reactions, and the impact of different xenobiotics as well as chemotherapies drugs.11 The production of ROS above permissible levels could result in damage of cellular macromolecules, for example to change the structure of DNA, membrane lipids, and proteins, which may result in diseases such as cancer, aging, inflammation, and different neurodegenerative disorders as well as other diseases.2,4,9,11 Therefore, there has been a growing interest in the development of natural antioxidant compounds from various sources, which could impact the redox state of the cells and could prevent damage from oxidant-mediated reactions.

Chitosan is the deacetylated form of chitin, a biopolymer that occurs naturally as a component of fungal cell walls, insect exoskeletons, and crustacean shells. Chemically, it is a linear copolymer consisting of β-(1 → 4)-2-acetamido-d-glucose and β-(1 → 4)-2-amino-d-glucose units. It is known that it exhibits versatile biological properties, including biodegradability, biocompatibility, and a less toxic nature.12,13 As a biomaterial, chitosan elicits a negligible immune response, after implantation, injection, topical application, or ingestion in the mammalian system.14,15

The natural cationic polysaccharide possesses attractive hemostatic properties. It has been reported that chitosan stimulates the host immune system against viral and bacterial infection.13,16,17 Because of its biological properties, including antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and immunostimulatory activities, the biopolymer has been used in a wide variety of pharmaceutical, biomedical, food industry, health, and agricultural applications and has been classified as a new physiologically bioactive material.13,18–23

In this mini-review, we will focus on the antioxidant properties, redox-regulatory activities of chitosan and its derivatives, and their application as anticancer agents.

Antioxidant Activities of Chitosan and Its Derivatives

Antioxidant activity is one of the well-known functions of chitosan and due to that reason the biopolymer and its derivatives have attracted the attention of researchers from different research areas.24,25 Many in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that chitosan exhibits redox-regulatory activity due to inhibition of ROS production, prevention of lipid oxidation by significantly reduced serum free fatty acids, and malondialdehyde concentrations and it increases intracellular antioxidant enzymes in biological systems. Santhosh et al. demonstrated the prevention of oxidation of hepatotoxic lipids by chitosan, when it was administrated in rats treated with isoniazid or rifampicin.26,27

Other experiments with rats reported that chitosan inhibits glycerol-induced renal oxidative damage.26,28 Xie et al. reported that the scavenging of hydroxyl radicals by chitosan inhibits the lipid peroxidation of phosphatidylcholine and linoleate liposomes.26,29 Cho et al. studied the antioxidant properties of plain chitosan on RAW264,7 mouse macrophage cells. They have demonstrated that plain chitosan in concentration up to 500 μg/mL did not exert a toxic effect on this cell line, but significant lipid peroxidation inhibition by scavenging the lipid-derived radicals was reported.30

Wen et al. presented a comparative study about activation of intracellular antioxidant enzymes by chitosan, chitosan nanoparticles, and vitamin C on mouse macrophages RAW264,7 cell line.26 They established that treatment of RAW264,7 cells with 500 μM H2O2 for 12 h caused a decrease in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and GSH activity, but preincubation with chitosan nanoparticles at 100 μg/mL restored the H2O2-induced decrease of the antioxidant activity. Moreover, the data showed that chitosan nanoparticles restored more effectively SOD and GSH activity than plain chitosan, and the recovery of the antioxidant activity was close to the recovery induced by vitamin C at 250 μM/mL. The authors assumed that the protective mechanism of action of chitosan nanoparticles against H2O2-induced RAW264,7 cell injury was due to restoring the activities of endogenous antioxidants, along with enhancement of their gene expression.26

There are also observations that chitosan can scavenge free radicals or chelate metal ions from the donation of hydrogen or the lone pairs of electrons.24,28,29 The fact that chitosan shows a strong metal-ion chelating ability suggests that it could be a potential natural product antioxidant, especially when the deactivation of catalytic activity of metal ions, for example Fe2+/Fe3+, was considered31,32–34 These metals, which are a key aspect of effective antioxidant systems, represent the main catalysts of oxidation processes in biological systems, because they participate in the oxidation of cells macromolecules, such as of lipids, DNA, etc.20,21,35–37 The interaction of chitosan with metal ions could involve several complex processes, including adsorption, ion exchange, and chelation.38

In relation to the cited experimental studies of chitosan, several mechanisms about chitosan antioxidant action have been proposed.24 The hydroxyl (-OH) and amino (-NH2) groups in chitosan are the key functional groups for its antioxidant activity, but their dissociation could be difficult, due to the semi-crystalline structure of chitosan and the presence of strong hydrogen bonds.29 On the other hand, there are studies that have shown that to develop its antioxidant activities, chitosan has to overcome: (1) poor solubility, (2) chemical inertness based on the strong inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds network, and (3) poor H-atom-donating ability to serve as a good chain-breaking antioxidant.31

To confirm these allegations, Alexandrova et al. established that the antioxidant activity of chitosan was essentially zero.31,39 Another study of Li et al. reported the very high EC50(1.2 × 106 μgmL−1) of chitosan from EPR studies, pointing out that inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds blunt free-radical reactions.31,40 To enhance water solubility of chitosan by disrupting inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonding, a number of researchers proposed the synthesis of chitosan derivatives with improved solubility. Their antioxidant activities were proved by experiments conducted in both cell free13,31,41–44 and cell environment.

For example, Ngo et al. examined the antioxidant capacity of chitosan gallate on SW1353 cells and on mouse macrophage exposed to H2O2.45 The data from both studies indicated an increase in the intracellular antioxidant enzymes (SOD and GSH), suppression of the NF-kB activity, and prevention of oxidative damage to cellular biomolecules in living cells by both indirect and direct ways.45 Liu et al. used ECV304 cells that were pretreated with different concentrations of chitooligosaccharides before exposure to H2O2. They have observed statistically significant suppression of the intracellular levels of ROS by chitooligosaccharides in the concentration range of 100–200 g/mL. They established that the effects of chitooligosaccharides as ROS-scavenging agents were similar to those induced by vitamin C in a concentration of 250 g/mL, and they also demonstrated a significant decrease of malondialdehyde at the intracellular level (a marker of lipid peroxidation).46

A number of studies indicated that chitooligosaccharides regulated the antioxidant enzyme activities due to elevated expression of intracellular antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, catalase (CAT), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) under H2O2-mediated oxidative stress on both rats and cell cultures.26,47–51 For example, Mendis et al. studied the redox modulation capacity of chitooligosaccharides in different concentrations on the B16F1 cell line and established that different molecular weight oligosaccharides exhibited differential capabilities to increase cellular GSH levels, due to different permeability of chitooligosaccharides into the cells.52

Similar results of intracellular antioxidant enzyme activation by chitooligosaccharides have been observed by Liu et al. They described that the preincubation of ECV304 cells with 300 μM H2O2 and treatment with chitooligosaccharides at a concentration 100 μg/mL restored the activity of the antioxidant enzymes SOD and GSH by about 44.9% and 23.5%, respectively. The authors compared the antioxidant activity of chitooligosaccharides with that of vitamin C in a concentration of 250 μg/mL and observed that at the same working conditions, SOD and GSH were restored by vitamin C with 19.2% and 15.1%, respectively.46 The experimental data of Xu et al. and Luo et al. proved that chitooligosaccharides (0.1–1 mg/mL) alleviated oxidative stress-associated cellular damage and induction of apoptosis in hepatocytes via mechanisms requiring the NF-E2-related factor-2 mediated upregulation of antioxidant enzymes, including heme oxygenase-1, NAD(P)H, quinone dehydrogenase-1, and SOD.53–55

With respect to the antioxidant properties of chitosan and its derivatives, the review data outlined a number of factors that may affect their antioxidant activity, such as molecular weight and deacetylation degree of chitosan, the grafting method, and the grafting ratio.56 Besides, it could be stated that chitosan and its derivatives possess redox-regulatory activity, because they could act as scavenger cellular-free radicals and, subsequently, to inhibit radical mediated cellular oxidation, which could, in turn, lead to restoration of intracellular antioxidant enzyme activities and, consequently, to restoration of the normal functioning of oxidation biochemical processes in the cells.

Anticancer Effects of Chitosan and Its Derivatives

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process, accompanied by accumulated genetic alterations in the somatic cells.56,57 However, different studies have shown that mitochondrial metabolism has a fundamental role in uncontrolled cell proliferation because many scientific researchers have demonstrated the influence of increased levels of ROS generation in all steps of oncogene transformation and cancer progression.58–61 Many studies suggest that due to their redox metabolism, cancer cells are characterized with increased ROS generation, as well as over-expression of antioxidant enzymes in response to the permanent oxidative stress, in comparison to normal cells.13,62–66 But at the same time, there are many evidences that have shown that mitochondria and producing ROS are key regulators for induction of cancer cell death.67–72

Natural products have played a pivotal rule in guiding researchers to develop efficient anticancer agents.73 Many polysaccharides extracted from natural sources have been found to possess a variety of biological activities and can be classified into two groups based on their sources, natural and semi-synthetic polysaccharides, which are produced by chemical or enzymatic modifications of the parent macromolecules.74 In recent years, numerous studies have reported similar natural compounds with redox-modulation activity, when applied in cancer treatment and in the same time, without any cytotoxic effect, when it is applied on normal cells. There are confirmatory studies that have demonstrated the anticancer and chemo-preventive effect of chitosan and its derivatives on cancer cells and no effect on normal cell viability. The data are summarized in Table 1. It was proposed that the different effect on cancer and normal cells was due to redox-regulation activity of chitosan (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Some of the Most Relevant Findings That Described Different Activity of Chitosan and Its Derivatives on Normal and Cancer Cells (Redox-Regulatory Activity)

Type chitosan Type cells Observed activity Ref.
Antioxidant capacity
 Chitosan nanoparticles (at concentration 100 μg/mL) RAW264,7 cells exposed to 500 μM H2O2 for 12 h incubation time Protective mechanism, due to restoration of H2O2-induced decrease of activity of SOD and GSH. The recovery of antioxidant enzyme activity in the cells was close to the recovery induced by vitamin C at a concentration of 250 μM/mL; enhancement of enzyme gene expression. 26
 Chitosan gallate (at concentration up to 100 μg/mL) SW1353 and mouse macrophage, exposed to 2 mM H2O2 and 0.1 M FeSO4 (Fenton reaction) and incubation time of 30 min Nontoxic effect; increase of intracellular SOD and CAT activity on both studies; suppression of NF-kB activity; prevention of oxidative damage by indirect and direct ways. 66
 Chitooligosaccharides (in concentration range of 25–200 g/mL) ECV304 cells exposed to H2O2 in a concentration of 300 μM and incubation time of 12 h Preventive effect on suppressing the production of lipid peroxidation; restored activity of endogenous antioxidants (SOD and GSH-Px); decrease of intracellular ROS level production and ROS-scavenging activity, which were commensurable with antioxidant activity of vitamin C, applied in a concentration of 250 g/mL. 67
Anticancer activity
 Chitosan (in concentration up to 500 μg/mL−1 and incubation time of 24, 48, and 72 h) MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, T47D breast cancer cells Inhibitory effect on cell proliferation; depolarization on mitochondrial membrane; increased ROS production, DNA oxidation, and S phase cell cycle arrest. 65
 Chitosan nanoparticles (at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight for a period of 15 consecutive days) Female mice bearing solid Ehrlich carcinoma in neck region Antitumor activity; increased malonedialdehyde levels (marker for lipid peroxidation) and decreased GSH levels. 77
 Chitosan-copper complex (0.5 g chitosan was dissolved in 50 mL of 1% acetic acid solutions containing different amounts of copper sulfate) Tumor cell lines 293 and HeLa and normal lung fibroblast cell line HLF Inhibition of tumor cell line proliferation, but not that of the normal human lung fibroblast cell line HLF. 7

ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD, superoxide dismutase.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Influence of redox-regulatory activity of chitosan and its derivatives on cell viability of both cancer and normal cells.

Salehi et al. observed that chitosan exerts an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and T47D breast cancer cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner, while being non-toxic to fibroblast L929 normal cells. They have shown that exposure of MDA-MB-231 cells to chitosan led to depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, increase of ROS generation, DNA oxidation, and S phase cell cycle arrest. The authors also established alteration expression of caspase 3, which indicated that MDA-MB-231 cells become progressively apoptotic on chitosan exposure.75

Dou et al. investigated that chitooligosaccharides at a concentration of 100 mg/mL applied on neutrophils from glycogen-induced peritonitis mice caused the production of superoxide and H2O2, as well as induction of apoptosis. Moreover, SOD administration could abolish the proapoptotic effect induced by chitooligosaccharides. The authors observed that increased production of superoxide in neutrophils by chitooligosaccharides has a key role in induction of apoptosis in these cells. They also demonstrated that the addition of inhibitors of phospholipase D and the PI3K signaling pathway suppressed generation of superoxide, which lead to the assumption that production of superoxide induced by chitooligosaccharides is due to activation of phospholipase D and the PI3K signaling pathway.76

In the study of Ahmed et al., the effect of chitosan nanoparticles on tumor neovascularization growth on the model of female mice bearing solid Ehrlich carcinoma in the neck region was presented. The authors observed that in vitro, chitosan nanoparticles showed high antitumor activities, which were accompanied with an increase in MDA level and a decrease in GSH level in tumor tissues.77

Martínez-Torres et al. established that chitosan gold nanoparticles (3–10 nm) are cytotoxic in a dose-dependent manner in cervical (HeLa) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines. Incubation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with chitosan gold nanoparticles in the same conditions displayed induction of low cytotoxicity in these cells. The cell death mechanism is specific for the type of cancer cell line tested, but in all cases, ROS production is mandatory for cell death induction by chitosan gold nanoparticles. The experimental results demonstrated that inhibition of ROS production with N-acetyl cysteine leads to inhibition of cell death.78

Zheng et al. investigated the effect of chitosan-copper complexes on tumor cell lines 293 and HeLa and normal lung fibroblast cell line HLP. After 48 h of incubation time, cell proliferation was investigated and the results indicated that chitosan-copper complexes selectively inhibited HeLa and 293 tumor cell line proliferation, but there was no inhibition in the growth of HLF.79 Another research observed that chitooligosaccharides (a polymerization degree of 2–8) could decrease tumor angiogenesis and exhibited antioxidant activity by augmenting the SOD activity in Kunming mice that were implanted with human breast cancer cells, dose dependently.80

Chemo-preventive activity of chitooligosaccharides in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells line (HT-29) was reported to be the result of regulation activity of intracellular antioxidant enzymes GSH and GR.81 It was also observed that chitooligosaccharides inhibited proinflammatory cytokine-mediated nitric oxide (NO) production and inducible NO synthase (iNOS), leading to a decrease in proliferation of HT-29.82

The Redox Activity of Chitosan: A Possible Mechanism for Sensitizing Cancer Cells Toward Chemotherapeutics

The redox-regulatory mechanisms of chitosan described earlier as well as other research results could be used as a reason for conducting a deeper study about anti-carcinogenic mechanisms of chitosan. There are data that have shown that the initiation by chitosan intracellular elevation of ROS generations, specifically in cancer cells, could be closely linked with activation of intracellular calcium signalization and lead to enhancement of the human defense system (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

A possible specific cancer cell mechanism, for elevation of intracellular ROS production, which could be closely associated with activation of calcium signalization and enhancement of the human defense system. ROS, reactive oxygen species.

There are evidences that have demonstrated that the human immune system has great potential to destroy cancer cells without being toxic to the healthy tissue and organs and the activation and effector role of immune cells is dependent on Ca2+ influx.83–89 The distinct immune cells are able to recognize cancer cells by forming Ca2+-dependent cytotoxicity and using a killing mechanism either through the release of lytic granules and granzymes or by activation of the Fas-Fas ligand receptor, known as the death receptor.83–89 Further, it has recently been shown that increased Ca2+ concentration in the cytosol is crucial for lytic granule exocytosis in natural killer cells and CTLs as well as production of cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-γ) by natural killer cells.87 It has been also demonstrated that along with the depolarizing nature of cancer cells, Ca2+ concentration can also be a marker of the action of killer T cells.86,89

In this respect, it is suggested that the antitumor activity of water-soluble chitosan might be related, in part, to an enhancement of the proliferation of cytolytic lymphocytes, natural killer cells.90,91 Among the first who reported about immune enhancement by chitosan are Suzuki et al. They proved that the antitumor mechanism of chitooligosaccharides is to enhance acquired immunity by accelerating T cell differentiation to increase cytotoxicity and maintain T cell activity.92

Using both in vitro and in vivo models, many scientific researchers have shown that chitooligosaccharides do hold promise in boosting both the innate and adaptive immunities.93 The dose ranges of chitooligosaccharides that have been found to produce the immunostimulating effects are 10–100 μg/mL for in vitro studies and 100–500 mg/kg/day for in vivo studies.94,95 It was observed that within these concentration ranges chitooligosaccharides stimulated the secretion of TNF-α and IL-1β from macrophages and increased iNOS expression and NO production in macrophages, which led to enhancement of the tumor-killing ability of macrophages.94–96 It is well known that NO is produced by nitric oxide synthase, of which two isoforms (nNOS/NOS1 and eNOS/NOS3) are regulated in a Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent manner.97,98

On the other hand, there are evidences that have shown that chitooligosaccharides applied on both colorectal cancer cell lines and colitis-associated colorectal cancer in mice lead to suppression of cancer development by stimulation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), increase of the intracellular Ca2+ levels, inducing caspase-3 cleavage-mediated apoptosis of cancer cells and suppression of inflammatory responses by inhibiting NF-kB signaling.99–102 According to another study, chitooligosaccharides caused inhibitory effects on the proliferation of human rental carcinoma in both in vitro and in vivo models.103

In vitro results demonstrated that chitooligosaccharides induced G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis in an ROS-dependent fashion and caused activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathway. In vivo results were consistent with the in vitro data, because it was established that chitooligosaccharides repressed tumor growth and ROS accumulation and induced apoptosis mainly via ROS-dependent ER stress pathways.103 It was observed that intracellular Ca2+ can directly initiate mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, through calcineurin-dependent dephosphorylation of the proapoptotic proteins,104 but the coordinated and complex interaction of both Ca2+ and ROS appeared to be necessary for the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and apoptotic (and necrotic) cell death activation.105

Although many studies have examined the redox control of Ca2+ homeostasis, relatively few studies have investigated this connection specifically as it pertains to carcinogenesis or metastatic progression. In this regard, it is necessary to conduct a deeper research application of natural compounds with redox-modulation activity in cancer therapy as chitosan and its derivatives and to investigate their impact on the intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, ROS generation, and the activation of the human defense system.

Conclusions and Perspectives

In the present mini-review, the possible redox-regulation potential of chitosan and its derivatives is presented. The considered in vitro studies on normal cell lines demonstrated the nontoxic effect of chitosan and its derivatives, due to their action as ROS-scavenging agents and the observed increased levels of intracellular antioxidant enzymes. On the other hand, when applied on cancer cells, the biopolymers have exhibited an anticancer effect, which could be due to the different redox metabolism of the cancer cells as compared with normal ones. The review results displayed increased ROS generation, decreased level of intracellular antioxidant enzymes, depolarization of mitochondrial membrane, caspase activation, and activation of signal transduction pathways for induction of apoptosis. In this study, another aspect of chitosan anticancer activity, due to its immunostimulatory activity, closely related to changed calcium homeostasis in cancer cells, was proposed. In this regard, it is necessary to conduct deeper research for application of natural compounds with redox-modulation activity in cancer therapy, and to investigate their impact on the intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, ROS generation, and the activation of the human defense system.

Abbreviations Used

AMPK

AMP-activated protein kinase

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

GR

glutathione reductase

iNOS

inducible NO synthase

NADPH

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SOD

superoxide dismutase

Authors' Contribution

D.G.I. performed the literature review, drafted the article, and revised it critically for important intellectual content. Z.L.Y. reviewed the article. All authors read and approved the final article.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under the National Research Program “Healthy Foods for a Strong Bio-Economy and Quality of Life” approved by DCM # 577/17.08.2018” and by Scientific Project 13/2018, FVM, Trakia University, Bulgaria.

Cite this article as: Ivanova DG, Yaneva ZL (2020) Antioxidant properties and redox-modulating activity of chitosan and its derivatives: biomaterials with application in cancer therapy, BioResearch Open Access 9:1, 64–72, DOI: 10.1089/biores.2019.0028.

References

  • 1. Ivanova D, Zhelev Zh, Aoki I, et al. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species-oigatory or not for induction of apoptosis by anticancer drugs. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016;28:383–396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pulkes T, Hanna MG. Human mitochondrial DNA diseases. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;49:27–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Turrens JF. Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J Physiol. 2003;552:335–344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Weinberg F, Chandel NS. Reactive oxygen species development signaling regulates cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:3663–3673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROSgenersting NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2007; 87:245–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Urlacher VB, Girhard M. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: an update on perspectives for synthetic application. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:26–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wassmann S, Wassmann K, Nickenig G. Modulation of oxidant and antioxidant enzyme expression and function in vascular cells. Hypertension. 2004;44:381–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:44–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Finkel T, Holbook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000;408:239–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wang J, Yi J. Cancer cell killing via ROS: to increase or decrease that is the question. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7:1875–1884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Moskovitz J, Yim MB, Chock PB. Free radicals and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002;397:354–359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chadchawan S, Pichyangkura R. Biostimulant activity of chitosan in horticulture. Sci Horticulturae. 2015;196:49–65 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lee DS, Cho YS, Je JY. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of chitosan- phloroglucinol conjugate. Fish Aquat Sci. 2013;16:229–235 [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Foster LJR, Ho S, Hook J, et al. Chitosan as a biomaterial: influence of degree of deacetylation on its physiochemical, material and biological properties. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kumar M. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Func Poly. 2000;46:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hoekstra A, Struszczyk H, Kivekäs O. Percutaneous microcrystalline chitosan application for sealing arterial puncture sites. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1467–1471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Peluso G, Petillo O, Ranierei M, et al. Chitosan-mediated stimulation of macrophage function. Biomaterials. 1994;15:1215–1220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Park PJ, Je JY, Byun HG, et al. Antimicrobial activity of hetero-chitosans and their oligosaccharides with different molecular weights. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;14:317–323 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Park PJ, Je JY, Kim SK. Free radical scavenging activities of differently deacetylated chitosans using an ESR spectrometer. Carbohydr Polym. 2004;55:17–22 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee SH, Ryu BM, Je JY, et al. Diethylaminoethyl chitosan induces apoptosis in HeLa cells via activation of caspase-3 and p53 expression. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;84:571–578 [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee SH, Senevirathne M, Ahn CB,et al. Factors affecting anti-inflammatory effect of chitooligosaccharides in lipopolysaccharides-induced RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:6655–6658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jeon YJ, Kim SK. Potential immune-stimulating effect of antitumoral fraction of chitosan oligosaccharides. J Chitin Chitosan. 2001;6:163–167 [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kim SK, Rajapakse N, Shahidi F.. Production of bioactive chitosan oligosaccharides and their potential use as nutraceuticals. In: Marine Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods. Barrow C, Shahidi F, (eds.) CRC Press, London and New York, GB and US; pp. 183–196; 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Rajalakshmi A, Krithiga N, Jayachitra A. Antioxidant activity of the chitosan extracted from shrimp exoskeleton. Middle East J Sci Res. 2013;16:1446–1451 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kim KW, Thomas RL. Antioxidant activity of chitosans with varying molecular weights. Food Chem. 2007;101:308–318 [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wen ZS, Liu LJ, Qu YL, et al. Chitosan nanoparticles attenuate hydrogen peroxide-induced stress injury in mouse macrophage RAW 264,7 cells. Marine Drugs. 2013;11:3582–3600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Santhosh S, Sini TK, AnandanR, et al. Effect of chitosan supplementation on antitubercular drugs-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Toxicology. 2006;219:53–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lin SB, Chen SH, Peng KC. Preparation of antibacterial chito-oligosaccaride by altering the degree of deacetylation of β-chitosan in a Trichodermaharzianumchitinase -hydrolysing process. JSFA. 2009;89:238–244 [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xie W, Xu P, Lui Q. Antioxidant activity of water-soluble chitosan derivates. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001;11:1699–1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Onsosyen E, Skaugrud O. Metal recovery using chitosan. J Chem Technol Biotech. 1990;49:395–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Buettner GR, Oberley LW, Chan Leuthauser SWH. The effect of iron on the distribution of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals as seen by spin trapping and on the superoxide dismutase assay. Photochem Photobiol. 1978;28:693–695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Decker EA. Strategies for manipulating the prooxidative/antioxidative balance of foods to maximize oxidative stability. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1998;9:241–248 [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Haber F, Weiss JJ. The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by iron salts. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 1934;147:332–351 [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Eom TK, Senevirathne M, Kim SK. Synthesis of phenolic acid conjugated chitooligosaccharides and evolution of their antioxidant activity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012;34:519–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mendis E, Kim MM, Rajapakse N, et al. An in vitro cellular analysis of the radical scavenging efficacy of chitooligosaccharides. Life Sci. 2007;80:2118–2127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pan H, Yang Q, Huang G, et al. Hypolipidemic effects of chitosan and its derivatives in hyperlipidemic rats induced by a high-fat diet. Food Nutr Res. 2016;60:1–12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cho YS, Kim SK, Je JY. Chitosan gallate as potential antioxidant biomaterial. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:3070–3073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Itzincab-Mejía L, López-Luna A, Gimeno M, et al. Enzymatic grafting of gallate ester onto chitosan: evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2013; 48:2034–2041 [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yoon HJ, Moon ME, Park HS, et al. Effects of chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) on the glycerol-induced acute renal failurein vitro and in vivo. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46:710–716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Xing R, Yu H, Liu S, et al. Antioxidant activity of differently regioselective chitosan sulfates in vitro. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13:1387–1392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Liu JN. Study on the Hypolipidemic Mechanism of Chitosan. Ph.D. Thesis, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. The importance of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human diseases. Mol Asp Med. 1985;8:189–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Li ASW, Cummings KB, Roethling HP, et al. A spin-trapping dataase implemented on the IBM PC/AT. J Magn Resonan. 1998;79:140–142 [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Role of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human disease: an overview. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:1–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Pasanphan W, Chirachanchai S. Conjugation of gallic acid onto chitosan: an approach for green and water-based antioxidant. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;72:169–177 [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Venkataraman S, Schafer FQ, Buettner GR. Detection of lipid radicals using EPR. Antiox Redox Signal. 2004;6:631–638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Williams WB Cuvelier ME, Berset C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci Technol. 1995;28:25–30 [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Cheng Z, Ren J, Li Y, et al. Establishment of a quantitative structure-activity relationship model for evaluating and predicting the protective potentials of phenolic antioxidants on lipid peroxidation. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92:475–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Park PJ, Jc JY, Kim SK. Free radical scavenging activities of differently deacetylated chitosans using EPR spectrometer. Carbohydr Polym. 2004;55:17–22 [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Caldas C. Molecular assessment of cancer. Br Med J. 1998;316:1360–1363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Park PJ, Je JY, Kim SK. Free radical scavenging activity of chitooligosaccharides by electron spin resonance spectrometry. JAFC. 2003;51:4624–4627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Andres AC, Arthur IC. Antioxidant properties of S-adenosyl-L-methionine in Fe2+-initiated oxidations. Free Rad Biol Med. 2004;36:1303–1316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Guzzman J, Saucedo I, Revilla J, et al. Copper sorption by chitosan in the presence of citrate ions: influence of metal speciation on sorption mechanism and uptake capacities. Int J Biol Macrom. 2003;33:57–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Chia-Chi H, Ling-Ming T, Hsin-Chen L. Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer progression. Exp Biol Med. 2016;241:1281–1295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Boland ML, Chourasia AH, Macleod KF. Mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer. Front Oncol Mol Cell Oncol. 2013;292:1–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in tumor progression. Front Biosci. 2005;10:1881–1896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Ozben T. Oxidative stress and apoptosis: impact on cancer therapy. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96:2181–2196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Inoki K, Corradetti MN, Guan KL. Dysregulation of the TSC-mTOR pathway in human disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37:19–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Luo Z, Dong X, Ke Q, et al. Chitooligosaccharides inhibit ethanol-induced oxidative stress via activation of Nrf2 and reduction of MAPK phosphorylation. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:2215–2222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Xu W, Huang HC, Lin CJ, et al. Chitooligosaccharides protect rat cortical neurons against copper induced damage by attenuating intracellular level of reactive oxygen species. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20:3084–3088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Xu Q, Ma P, Yu W, et al. Chitooligosaccharides protect human embryonic hepatocytes against oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide. Biotechnol (NY). 2010;12:292–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Dou J, Xu Q, Tan C, et al. Effects of chitosan oligosaccharides on neutrophils from glycogen-induced peritonitis mice model. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;75:119e124 [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Zhang XF, Sun RQ, Jai YF, et al. Synthesis and mechanisms of action of novel harmine derivatives as potential antitumor agents. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Liu G, Kuang S, Wu S, et al. A novel polysaccharide from Sargassum integerrimum induces apoptosis in A549 cells and prevents angiogensis in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Salehi F, Behboudi H, Kavoosib G,et al. Chitosan promotes ROS-mediated apoptosis and S phase cell cycle arrest in triple-negative breast cancer cells: evidence for intercalative interaction with genomic DNA. RSC Adv. 2017;7:43141–43150 [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ngo DH, Qian ZJ, Ngo DN, et al. Gallyl chitooligosaccharides inhibit intracellular free radical-mediated oxidation. Food Chem. 2011;128:974–981 [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Liu HT, Li WM, Xu G, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharides attenuate hydrogen peroxide-induced stress injury in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Pharmacol Res. 2009;59:167–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kahlos K, Soini Y, Pakko P, et al. Proliferation, apoptosis, and MnSOD in malignant mesothelioma. Int J Cancer. 2000;88:37–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Young TW, Mei FC, Yang G, et al. Activation of antioxidant pathways in ras-mediated oncogenic transformation of human surface ovarian epithelial cells revealed by functional proteomics and mass spectrometry. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4577–4584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Kim B, Song YS. Mitochondrial dynamics altered by oxidative stress in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2016;1–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zhou Y, Hileman EO, Plunkett W, et al. Free radical stress in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells and its role in cellular sensitivity to ROS-generating anticancer agents. Blood. 2003;101:4098–5004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Kannan K, Jain SK. Oxidative stress and apoptosis. Pathophysiol. 2000;7:153–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 2000;5:415–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Lennon SV, Martin SJ, Cotter TG. Dose-dependent induction of apoptosis in human tumour cell lines by widely diverging stimuli. Cell Prolif. 1991;24:203–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Hughes G, Murphy MP, Ledgerwood EC. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate the temporal activation of nuclear factor-kappaB to modulate tumor necrosis factorinduced apoptosis: evidence from mitochondria-targeted antioxidants. Biochem J. 2005;389:83–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Fernandes RS, Cotter TG. Apoptosis or necrosis: intracellular levels of glutathione influence mode of cell death. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;48:675–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Ahmed NH, Said UZ, Meky NH, et al. Role of chitosan nanoparticles as anti-angiogenic in mice bearing Ehrlich carcinoma. Oncol Res Rev. 2018;1:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Martínez-Torres AC, Zarate-Triviño DG, Helen Yarimet Lorenzo-Anota HY, et al. Chitosan gold nanoparticles induce cell death in HeLa and MCF-7 cells through reactive oxygen species production. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:3235–3250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Zheng Y, Yi Y, Qi Y, et al. Preparation of chitosan-copper complexes and their antitumor activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:4127–4129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Wu H, Yao Z, Bai X, et al. Chitooligosaccharides inhibit nitric oxide mediated migration of endothelial cells in vitro and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82:927–932 [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Nam KS, Kim MK, Shon YH. Chemopreventive effect of chitosan oligosaccharide against colon carcinogenesis. J Microbiol Biotech. 2007;17:1546–1549 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Nam KS, Kim MK, ShonYH. Inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine-induced invasiveness of HT-29 cells by chitosan oligosaccharide. J Microbiol Biotech. 2007;17:2042–2045 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Bose T, Cieślar-Pobuda A, Wiechec E. Role of ion channels in regulating Ca2+ homeostasis during the interplay between immune and cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:1–11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Franciszkiewicz K, Le Floc'h A, Boutet M, et al. CD103 or LFA-1 engagement at the immune synapse between cytotoxic T cells and tumor cells promotes maturation and regulates T-cell effector functions. Cancer Res. 2013;73:617–628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Maul-Pavicic A, Chiang SC, Rensing-Ehl A et al. ORAI1- mediated calcium influx is required for human cytotoxic lymphocyte degranulation and target cell lysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:3324–3329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Fierro L, Parekh AB. Substantial depletion of the intracellular Ca2+ stores is required for macroscopic activation of the Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ current in rat basophilic leukaemia cells. J Physiol. 2000;522:247–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Dustin ML, Long EO. Cytotoxic immunological synapses. Immunol Rev. 2010;235:24–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Ion channels and the hallamrks of cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2010;6:107–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Weidinger C, Shaw PJ, Feske S. STIM1 and STIM2-mediated Ca(2+) influx regulates antitumor immunity by CD8(+) T cells. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:1311–1321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Kim SK, Rajapakse N. Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): a review. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;62:357–368 [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Maeda Y, KimuraY. Antitumor effects of various low molecular-weight chitosans are due to increased natural killer activity of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. Nutr Cancer. 2004;134:945–950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Xia W, Liu P, Zhang J, et al. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25:170–179 [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Muanprasat C, Chatsudthipong V. Chitosan oligosaccharide: biological activities and potential therapeutic applications. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;170:80–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Feng J, Zhao L, Yu Q. Receptor-mediated stimulatory effect of oligochitosanin macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;317:414–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Zhang P, Liu W, Peng Y, et al. Tol-llike receptor 4 (TLR4) mediates the stimulating activities of chitosanoligosaccharide on macrophages. Int Immun. 2014;23:254–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Han Y, Zhao L, Yu Z, et al. Role of mannose receptor in oligochitosan-mediated stimulation of macrophage function. Int Immunopharmacol. 2005;5:1533–1542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Hempel N, Trebak M. Crosstalk between calcium and reactive oxygen species signaling in cancer. Cell Calcium. 2017;63:70–96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Alderton WK, Cooper CE, Knowles RG. Nitric oxide synthases: structure, function and inhibition. Biochem J. 2001;357:593–615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Muanprasat C, Wongkrasant P, Satitsri S, et al. Activation of AMPK by chitosan oligosaccharide in intestinal epithelial cells: mechanism of action and potential applications in intestinal disorders. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;96:225–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Kunanusornchai W, Witoonpanich B, Tawonsawatruk T,et al. Chitosan oligosaccharide suppresses synovial inflammation via AMPK activation: an in vitro and in vivo study. Pharmacol Res. 2016; 13:458–467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Su RY, Chao Y, Chen TY, et al. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside sensitizes TRAIL- and TNF{alpha}-induced cytotoxicity in colon cancer cells through AMP-activated protein kinase signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:1562–1571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Koh SJ, Kim JM, Kim IK, et al. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of metformin and its effects in intestinal inflammation and colitis-associated colon cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:502–510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Zhai X, Yuan S, Yang X, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharides induce apoptosis in human renal carcinoma via reactive-oxygen-species-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:1691–1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Wang HG, Pathan N, Ethell IM, et al. Ca2+- induced apoptosis through calcineurin dephosphorylation of BAD. Science. 1999;284:339–343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Rasola A, Bernardi P. Reprint of “The mitochondrial permeability transition pore and its adaptive responses in tumor cells.” Cell Calcium. 2015;58:18–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioResearch Open Access are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES