Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2020 Mar 16;16(3):e1008405. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008405

Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genes A7 and A8 regulate viral spread and are essential for malignant catarrhal fever

Françoise Myster 1, Mei-Jiao Gong 1, Justine Javaux 1, Nicolás M Suárez 2, Gavin S Wilkie 2, Tim Connelley 3, Alain Vanderplasschen 1, Andrew J Davison 2, Benjamin G Dewals 1,*
Editor: Paul D Ling4
PMCID: PMC7098659  PMID: 32176737

Abstract

Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) is a gammaherpesvirus that is carried asymptomatically by wildebeest. Upon cross-species transmission to other ruminants, including domestic cattle, AlHV-1 induces malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), which is a fatal lymphoproliferative disease resulting from proliferation and uncontrolled activation of latently infected CD8+ T cells. Two laboratory strains of AlHV-1 are used commonly in research: C500, which is pathogenic, and WC11, which has been attenuated by long-term maintenance in cell culture. The published genome sequence of a WC11 seed stock from a German laboratory revealed the deletion of two major regions. The sequence of a WC11 seed stock used in our laboratory also bears these deletions and, in addition, the duplication of an internal sequence in the terminal region. The larger of the two deletions has resulted in the absence of gene A7 and a large portion of gene A8. These genes are positional orthologs of the Epstein-Barr virus genes encoding envelope glycoproteins gp42 and gp350, respectively, which are involved in viral propagation and switching of cell tropism. To investigate the degree to which the absence of A7 and A8 participates in WC11 attenuation, recombinant viruses lacking these individual functions were generated in C500. Using bovine nasal turbinate and embryonic lung cell lines, increased cell-free viral propagation and impaired syncytia formation were observed in the absence of A7, whereas cell-free viral spread was inhibited in the absence of A8. Therefore, A7 appears to be involved in cell-to-cell viral spread, and A8 in viral cell-free propagation. Finally, infection of rabbits with either mutant did not induce the signs of MCF or the expansion of infected CD8+ T cells. These results demonstrate that A7 and A8 are both essential for regulating viral spread and suggest that AlHV-1 requires both genes to efficiently spread in vivo and reach CD8+ T lymphocytes and induce MCF.

Author summary

Gammaherpesvirus entry into immune cells can result in latent infection which is associated with viral persistence and severe lymphoproliferative diseases. Gammaherpesviruses enter target cells during primary infection via a complex machinery of envelope glycoproteins. Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) is a gammaherpesvirus carried by wildebeests without causing any clinical sign but induces malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) upon transmission to several species of ruminants including cattle. MCF is a deadly lymphoproliferative disease developing after a prolonged incubation period. In the present study, we demonstrated that the genes A7 and A8 of AlHV-1 encode envelope glycoproteins that are orthologs of Epstein-Barr virus gp42 and gp350, which regulate cell tropism switch. Impairment of A7 or A8 expression in a pathogenic strain of AlHV-1 strongly altered viral propagation in vitro. We further showed using bovine respiratory cell lines in vitro that AlHV-1 uses A7 to mediate cell-to-cell spread whereas A8 is necessary for cell-free viral propagation. Then, infection of rabbits as an experimental model to induce MCF with recombinant viral strains demonstrated that both A7 and A8 are essential for the induction of MCF. Thus, this study highlights an essential role for gp42 and gp350 orthologs in the pathogenesis of a gammaherpesvirus-induced lymphoproliferative disease.

Introduction

Gammaherpesvirus infection results in lifelong viral persistence in the natural host through the establishment of latency, whereas reactivation from latency is responsible for transmission from one host to another and viral persistence at the population level. Primary acute gammaherpesvirus infection is usually asymptomatic, but, under specific circumstances, latent persistence can cause the development of severe proliferative diseases and cancers [1]. In particular, the two human gammaherpesviruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) are responsible for severe oncogenic syndromes: Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and infectious mononucleosis for EBV, and Kaposi’s sarcoma, multicentric Castleman’s disease and primary effusion lymphoma for KSHV [25]. A better understanding of the oncogenic mechanisms leading to cancer development is required for the development of effective therapies, and a comprehensive knowledge of how gammaherpesviruses enter their hosts during primary infection is key to the development of preventive measures targeting primary infection and reactivation. Although humanized mouse models are providing new perspectives into the pathogenesis of human gammaherpesviruses [6], much can also be learned from studying animal models of gammaherpesvirus infection [7,8].

Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1) is a gammaherpesvirus belonging to the genus Macavirus that includes various viruses involved in malignant catarrhal fever (MCF). AlHV-1 naturally infects wildebeest (Connochaetes sp.), and transmission is thought to occur in general during the first months of life via ocular and nasal secretions [9,10]. Importantly, most wildebeest naturally carry AlHV-1 infection, and, although the virus establishes persistent infection in this species, wildebeest do not develop any clinical sign [11]. However, upon transmission to related species, such as members of the subfamily Bovinae (including domesticated cattle), AlHV-1 can induce MCF, which is an acute, sporadic and fatal pan-systemic lymphoproliferative disease. The impact of MCF on local pastoralist populations has largely been underestimated, with recent reports demonstrating that MCF is a prominent cattle disease with highest economic and social impacts in regions of East-Africa subject to seasonal wildebeest migrations [1214]. In addition, MCF has been reported throughout the world in game farms or zoological collections in which mixed ruminant species including wildebeest are kept [15].

Recent data have demonstrated that MCF is caused by activation and proliferation of latently infected CD8+ T cells [1619], and that viral genome persistence in CD8+ T lymphocytes through expression of the latency-associated nuclear antigen encoded by gene ORF73 is essential for MCF induction [18]. Interestingly, MCF is similar to the pathology caused by the New World monkey gammaherpesviruses saimiriine herpesvirus 2 and ateline herpesvirus 2 and 3, which also infect T lymphocytes and cause peripheral T cell lymphomas in tamarins, marmosets or owl monkeys [20]. Despite recent work investigating the pathogenesis of wildebeest-derived MCF in cattle and in the rabbit experimental model, the mechanisms by which AlHV-1 triggers cell proliferation and activation during latency-like infection of CD8+ T cells to induce a peripheral T cell lymphoma-like disease remain unresolved [18,2125]. In addition to the oncogenic mechanisms leading to lymphoproliferation, another important aspect of the development of preventive control strategies is the understanding of the first steps of host entry during primary AlHV-1 infection, from attachment to the mucosal barrier to infection of CD8+ T lymphocytes.

Herpesviruses enter target cells using complex mechanisms involving numerous virion envelope glycoproteins. The functions of these glycoproteins range from tethering virions to target cells, to mediating envelope-membrane fusion, to delivering viral capsids into the cytoplasm [26]. Multiple envelope glycoproteins and their dynamics of expression on virions regulate the switching of cell tropism, which is important for enabling viruses to infect different cell types during host colonization and then reach the cell populations in which they establish latency [7,26]. The core fusion complex involved in entry is composed of glycoprotein B (gB) and glycoproteins H and L (gH/gL) and is shared by all herpesviruses. In addition, gammaherpesviruses express non-essential, virus-specific attachment glycoproteins such as EBV glycoprotein 350 (gp350), the KSHV K8.1 protein (K8.1), murid herpesvirus 4 glycoprotein 150 (gp150) and bovine herpesvirus 4 (BoHV-4) glycoprotein 180 (gp180) [2732]. Moreover, EBV also express envelope glycoprotein 42 (gp42), which is involved in the switch of cell tropism and fusion in B cells [33]. Many studies have demonstrated the need for expression of and interactions between these proteins for cell entry in vitro, and animal models of gammaherpesvirus infection have provided important insights into understanding their role in host colonization [7]. However, their role in the viral life cycle in vivo in the context of lymphoproliferative disease induction is less well understood.

Studies on AlHV-1 have focused mainly on two laboratory strains, C500 and WC11, that were isolated from an ox developing MCF and a blue wildebeest, respectively [34,35]. Genome sequences of both strains are available [3638]. Although C500 has been maintained at limited passage numbers in culture in order to retain its pathogenicity [36], WC11 has been passaged a large number of times and has been described as an attenuated strain that is no longer able to induce MCF [39]. Recent data have suggested that WC11 attenuation in cell culture is associated with the loss of parts of the genome encoding putative envelope proteins [38]. In the present study, we first confirmed the genome sequence of a stock of WC11 maintained in our laboratory, and then investigated how the loss of such genes affects viral propagation in vitro and the ability to induce MCF in vivo.

Results

WC11 lacks A7 and a large part of A8

The genome sequence of a German stock of attenuated strain WC11 has been published and revealed high similarity to pathogenic strain C500 despite deletions in two regions that sum to 3.3 kbp [38]. However, the duplication of a 4177 bp region that includes genes ORF50 and A6 that we had reported previously in our seed stock of WC11 [36] was not identified in the German stock. Since genomic rearrangements might have occurred independently in different viral seed stocks, we sequenced the genome of our WC11 stock. This revealed a long unique region (LUR) of 127,605 bp flanked by multiple copies of two variants of a terminal repeat (TR; 864 and 973 bp), with one copy of the former containing the duplication (corresponding to nucleotides (nt) 71303–75479). The sequence dataset of 1,300,108 sequence reads contained 333,253 reads (26%) that matched LUR and TR sequences at an average coverage depth of 608 reads/nt. Comparison with the C500 sequence [36,37] revealed a high level of similarity (Fig 1, S1 Table). In addition to the duplication, this comparison revealed several features that were also present in the German WC11 stock (Fig 1). These included a highly divergent region near the right end of LUR encoding gene A9.5 and part of gene A10, the absence of a 1175 bp sequence at the left end of LUR containing gene A1 and microRNAs 1–4 [22], and the absence of a 2174 bp sequence located centrally in LUR and containing gene A7 and the 5’ region of gene A8. The duplicated sequence present in the TR also contained the same deleted sequence, indicating that the deletion had occurred prior to the duplication event [36]. Overall, the sequence of our stock of WC11 was very similar to the recently reported sequence [38], and confirmed that the genome has been subjected to several rearrangements during multiple passages in cell culture.

Fig 1. Attenuated AlHV-1 strain WC11 lacks gene A7 and part of gene A8.

Fig 1

The illustration is based on an alignment of the LUR sequences of WC11 and C500. Genome features are represented in the upper part in relation to the C500 sequence (GenBank accession AF005370) [37]. Protein-coding regions and their orientations are depicted by grey arrows, with the ORF prefix omitted for those not prefixed by A. Exons are indicated by horizontal blue lines. Percentage divergence is shown by the black-filled curve, percentage insertions and deletions by the blue-filled curve, and percentage G+C content by the green curve, with mean G+C content shown as a horizontal green line. These percentages were measured in a 100 bp window with 3 bp increments. Tandem repeat regions (R1 to R6) are depicted as hatched areas. The magenta bar shows region duplicated in the TR of WC11. The green bar shows region duplicated in the TR of C500. Regions absent from WC11 are flanked by dotted red lines.

AlHV-1 propagates differently in nasal fibroblasts and epithelial lung cells in vitro

The most likely transmission route of AlHV-1 to susceptible species is aerogenic [10,40]. Therefore, propagation of C500 (derived from a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone) and WC11 was compared in two cell lines selected for their respiratory origins: bovine turbinate (BT) cells and epithelial embryonic lung (EBL) cells. Titration of infectious WC11 virions (as plaque-forming units (PFU)) released into the medium and quantification of viral genomes in infected cells at 4 days post-infection (multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) = 0.01 PFU/cell) revealed that WC11 propagated more efficiently than C500 in both cell lines (Fig 2A–2C). No significant difference in terms of infectious virions or viral genomes of WC11 was detected in BT compared to EBL cells. Conversely, significantly smaller numbers of infectious virions and viral genome copies were observed for C500 in EBL compared to BT cells. These results suggested that WC11 produces infectious virions equally efficiently in BT and EBL cells, but that C500 spreads more efficiently in BT compared to EBL cells. When cell-free infectious virion numbers were normalized to cell-associated viral genome numbers, cell-free C500 virions were significantly fewer in EBL compared to BT cells, whereas the relative numbers of cell-free WC11 virions were similar in BT and EBL cells. These results suggested that cell-free propagation of C500 is favoured in BT cells, whereas cell-associated propagation is favoured in EBL cells. Viral propagation in BT and EBL cells was monitored by measuring the percentage of fluorescent cells infected by a C500 BAC clone-derived recombinant virus expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). This revealed that C500 propagated more efficiently in BT compared to EBL cells. Moreover, when cell-free propagation was impaired by culturing infected cells in the presence of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), viral propagation was significantly reduced in BT cells and remained low in EBL cells (Fig 2D and 2E). These results demonstrated that WC11 propagates more efficiently than C500 and suggest that, although BT cells enable cell-free propagation of C500, viral spread in EBL cells is limited to cell-associated growth. Finally, analysis of A7 and A8 RNA expression showed that both genes are expressed in BT and EBL cells infected with C500. As expected, no A7 RNA expression was detected in cells infected with WC11, and expression of truncated A8 RNA remained low compared to C500 (Fig 2F).

Fig 2. Differential propagation of AlHV-1 strains C500 and WC11 in the BT and EBL cell lines.

Fig 2

(A) Titers of infectious virions in cell medium at day 4 post-infection (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell). Plaque assays were performed on respective cell lines (BT or EBL) to quantify viral PFUs. (B) Viral genome copy numbers derived by qPCR of DNA extracted from infected cells at day 4 post-infection (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell). Values represent the absolute copy numbers of viral genomes per well of a 12-well plate. (C) Relative ratios of infectious virions in the medium per viral genome copy in infected cells. Values were normalized on C500 in BT cells and plotted on a log10 scale. (D) Viral propagation as percentage of eGFP+ BT or EBL cells measured by flow cytometry at the given time points after infection (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell) with C500 BAC+. (E) Viral propagation as in (D) with cells cultured in medium or medium containing 0.6% (w/v) CMC. (F) Quantitative PCR of A7 and A8 RNA expression at day 4 post-infection (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell). The results are shown as fold-expression values per viral genome copy normalized to C500 infection in BT cells (2-ΔCq using Cq of qPCR for ORF3 as in (B)). The results are shown as triplicates of mean ± S.D. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (*P<0.05; **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001).

A7 and A8 encode homologs of the EBV gp42 and gp350 genes

The attenuation of WC11 could be due, at least in part, to the loss of A7 and A8 function. Although no roles have been attributed to these genes, they are positional orthologs of genes encoding key envelope proteins in other gammaherpesviruses [41]. A7 corresponds to EBV gene BZLF2, which encodes a type II glycoprotein containing a C-type lectin-like domain and is also referred to as gp42. A8 corresponds to EBV gene BLLF1, which encodes a highly glycosylated type I glycoprotein and is also referred to as gp350. Both gp42 and gp350 are involved in regulating the tropism of EBV for B cells [26]. Orthologs of gp42 are present in viruses in only three gammaherpesvirus genera: Lymphocryptovirus, Percavirus and Macavirus. However, most gammaherpesviruses encode orthologs of gp350 [7]. Interestingly, the Ov8 gene encoded by the Macavirus ovine gammaherpesvirus 2 has recently been suggested to enhance gB/gH/gL-mediated membrane fusion [42]. In silico analyses predicted that, similar to gp42, A7 encodes a type II glycoprotein containing a C-type lectin-like domain (S1 and S2 Figs). Likewise, A8 was predicted to encode a type I glycoprotein containing numerous O-glycosylation sites, as reported previously for the orthologous genes in other gammaherpesviruses, such as in BoHV-4 [31,32,43]. These predictions strongly suggest that A7 and A8 are functional orthologs of EBV gp42 and gp350, respectively.

Production of recombinant viruses containing A7 and A8 nonsense mutations

In order to investigate the role of A7 and A8 during infection, C500 viruses impaired in A7 and/or A8 expression were generated by inserting in-frame stop codons into the C500 wild type (WT) BAC clone to create nonsense mutations (S3A and S3B Fig). The A7 coding region contains several potential in-frame start codons, and we chose to target two independently at nt 39 and 207. In the C500 (WT) BAC clone, the start codon at nt 39 is present in LUR and also in the TR-associated duplication [36], whereas the start codon at nt 207 is present only in LUR. To impair A8 expression, a stop codon was inserted at nt 159 in the coding region in order to avoid disrupting the overlapping A7 coding region. To impair both A7 and A8 expression, stop codons were inserted in the A7 coding sequence using the generated A8STOP BAC clone. The generated BAC clones were characterized by restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern blotting before transfecting into MacT cells or MacT cells expressing Cre recombinase (MacT-Cre cells) for excising the BAC vector via flanking loxP sites to obtain the A7STOP-39, A7STOP-207, A8STOP and A7STOP-207A8STOP viruses retaining or lacking the BAC vector (BAC+ or BAC), respectively [18]. C500 BAC+ and BAC were shown to display similar fitness in vitro [44]. The generated recombinant viruses (BAC clones and BAC viruses generated by transfection) were further verified by complete genome sequencing (S2 Table). With the exception of the nonsense mutations at the expected positions (S3C Fig), the viral genome sequences were identical. The A7STOP-39 and A7STOP-39A8STOP BAC clones displayed the insertion of the STOP codon in the LUR only and not in the TR-associated duplication [36]. Only a small part of the coding sequence of A7 (first 138 bp) is present in the duplication, which makes A7STOP-207 the most appropriate mutant to study the role of A7.

A7 regulates cell-associated propagation of AlHV-1 and the absence of A8 hampers cell-free propagation

The roles of A7 or A8 in viral growth in vitro were investigated by examining multistep growth kinetics and plaque size during infection of BT or EBL cells with the various generated viruses. Initial experiments showed that A7STOP-39 and A7STOP-207 displayed similar growth properties, and only the latter was used in subsequent experiments to avoid a risk of reversion from the duplicated sequence in the TR. In BT cells, the lack of A7 resulted in enhanced viral fitness with increased growth (Fig 3A and 3B) and production of larger plaques (Fig 3C), similar to WC11. In EBL cells, although growth of the A7STOP viruses was slightly increased compared to C500 (WT) (Fig 3A and 3B), A7STOP-207 produced significantly smaller plaques (Fig 3C). WC11 displayed increased growth and produced larger plaques in both cell lines. Absence of A8 resulted in severely impaired viral growth in both BT and EBL cells, with reduced growth (Fig 3A and 3B) and absence of detectable infectivity released into the medium of infected BT cells (Fig 3B). Although the lack of A8 resulted in significantly smaller plaques in BT cells, infection of EBL cells with A8STOP did not significantly affect plaque size at day 6 post-infection (Fig 3C). Interestingly, absence of both A7 and A8 expression resulted in viral growth similar to strain C500 in BT cells while more similar to A7STOP in EBL cells (Fig 3B). Moreover, infection of BT cells with A7STOPA8STOP did not significantly affect plaque size over time, but absence of both A7 and A8 generated significantly smaller plaques in EBL cells (Fig 3C). Viral propagation in the absence of A7 and/or A8 in BT and EBL cells was further assessed during infection by fluorescence microscopy in order to visualize infectious centers at day 1, 3, 4 and 6 post-infection (Fig 3D). Together, these analyses revealed that A7 expression is necessary for viral fitness in EBL whereas A8 expression affects viral propagation in BT cells.

Fig 3. A7 and A8 expression regulate viral propagation.

Fig 3

(A and B) Multistep growth curves of C500 BAC+ WT, BAC+ A7STOP-39, BAC+ A7STOP-207, BAC+ A8STOP-159, BAC+ A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 and WC11 in BT (top) or EBL (bottom) cells. Data are displayed as mean ± SD of measurements in triplicates. (A) Titers of cell-released and cell-associated infectious virions during infection. Plaque assays were performed on MDBK cells to quantify viral PFUs. (B) Titers of cell-released (left) and cell-associated infectious virions during infection. Plaque assays were performed on respective cell lines (BT or EBL) to quantify viral PFUs. (C) Infectious plaque areas during infection of BT (top) or EBL (bottom) cells. Data presented are mean ± SD of measurements in triplicates. (D) Microscopic analysis of viral propagation after infection of BT or EBL cells. Representative images are displayed for each time point after infection with C500 BAC+ (WT), BAC+ A7STOP-207, BAC+ A8STOP-159 or BAC+ A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell). Infectivity was revealed by eGFP expression (white signals). Original magnification = 40×.

A7 expression is necessary for syncytia formation and regulates infectivity

To obtain a fuller understanding of the role of A7 and A8 in plaque formation, BT or EBL cells were infected with C500 (WT), A7STOP-207, A8STOP, A7STOP-207A8STOP or WC11 and immunostained with a monoclonal antibody against the viral gp115 complex at day 4 post-infection (Fig 4) [45]. Fluorescent microscopy was then used to detect eGFP expression, anti-gp115 staining and DNA staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). C500 (WT) and A8STOP induced giant multinuclear syncytia in both BT and EBL cells, suggesting that A8 is dispensable for syncytia formation. However, A7STOP-207, A7STOP-207A8STOP and WC11 did not generate syncytia but caused a cytopathic effect with plaques formed of separated infected cells. These results suggest that A7 may be necessary for cell-to-cell viral transmission and promotion of membrane fusion.

Fig 4. Impaired syncytia formation in the absence of A7 expression.

Fig 4

BT or EBL cells grown on glass coverslips were inoculated with C500 BAC+ WT, BAC+ A7STOP-207, BAC+ A8STOP-159, BAC+ A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 or WC11 in presence of 0.6% CMC. At day 4 post-infection, cells were stained for glycoprotein complex gp115 (mAb 15-A; red in Merge) and DNA (DAPI; blue in Merge). Representative images are shown. Scale bars = 50 μm.

Since propagation of C500 (WT) was mainly cell-associated in EBL cells, whereas cell-free virion release occurred in BT cells (Fig 2D), an infectivity assay was performed to investigate the requirement for contact duration between the virion envelope and the cell membrane during viral entry (Fig 5A). The efficiency of C500 (WT) in entering EBL cells was more than 10 times higher than that of entering BT cells. However, in the absence of A7, the efficiency was significantly reduced in EBL cells but increased in BT cells (Fig 5B). Thus, whereas A7 was required for effective entry into EBL cells, its absence improved entry into BT cells. The role of A8 in entry could not be investigated owing to the very low titers obtained for A8STOP. To investigate further the role of A7 in cell-associated viral propagation, an assay using A7STOP-207 was performed as described in Fig 2D. Inhibition of infectious virion release into the medium by CMC-impaired propagation of A7STOP-207 (Fig 5C), thus further demonstrating that the increased growth of A7STOP-207 is mainly due to increased cell-free propagation and virion release in BT cells.

Fig 5. Infectivity assay.

Fig 5

(A) BT and EBL cells were inoculated with eGFP-expressing C500 BAC+ WT (m.o.i. = 0.05 PFU/cell) for the indicated times and then washed with PBS and cultured overnight. Viral infection was assayed 20 h later by flow cytometry for eGFP expression. (B) BT and EBL cells were inoculated with eGFP-expressing C500 BAC+ WT or BAC+ A7STOP-207 (m.o.i. = 0.05 PFU/cell) for the indicated times and then washed with PBS and cultured overnight as in (A). Plotted data represent entry efficiency as the normalized percentage of C500 (WT) virus after 120 min incubation. (C) Viral propagation of BAC+ A7STOP-207 (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell) in BT cells cultured in medium or medium containing 0.6% (w/v) CMC). Data are displayed as mean ± SEM of measurements in triplicates. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (****P<0.0001).

Impaired expression of A7 or A8 renders AlHV-1 unable to induce MCF in rabbits

To investigate the role of A7 and A8 in the induction of MCF, the experimental rabbit model was used [16,17,19,21]. Owing to the impaired growth of A8STOP and our consequent inability to obtain sufficient amounts of cell-free virus, rabbits were infected with BT cells exhibiting >90% cytopathic effect. Rabbits were administered intravenously with mock-infected cells or cells infected with C500 (WT), A7STOP-207, A8STOP or WC11 (Figs 6A–6C, 7A and 8). Typical lesions of MCF, such as persistent hyperthermia, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy, were observed only in rabbits infected with C500 (WT) (Fig 6A–6C, S4 Fig). Similarly, expansion of CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) during infection or in the spleen and popliteal lymph nodes, and other characteristic lesions, were observed only after infection with C500 (WT) (Fig 7 and Fig 8A and 8B). While we observed viral genomes increasing over time in PBMCs of rabbits infected with the WT virus, no viral copy could be detected in any time point after infection with A7STOP-207, A8STOP or WC11 viruses (Fig 8C). However, viral genomes could be detected in the spleen, liver and lung tissues of rabbits infected with the A7STOP-207, A8STOP or WC11 viruses at 42 days post-infection, although at significantly lower levels than in the WT group (Fig 8D). These results suggested that the lack of A7 or A8 expression impaired the development of MCF but did not completely impaired the infectivity of AlHV-1 in vivo. Although the viral inocula were not normalized in this experiment, these results demonstrated that A7 and A8 are required to induce MCF after intravenous infection using infected cells. Total anti-AlHV-1 antibodies and virus-neutralizing antibodies were detected in all groups (S5 Fig), but the antibody response was slightly lower in rabbits infected with A8STOP. This could have been due to the use of a lower infectious dose with this virus. Given this limitation, a further experiment was performed in which rabbits were administered intranasally with virions of C500 (WT) (5×104 and 2×105 PFU/rabbit) or A7STOP-207 (5×104, 2×105 and 8×105 PFU/rabbit) (Fig 6D–6F and Fig 9A and 9B). Clinical signs of MCF were induced by both doses of C500 (WT) but not by any dose of A7STOP-207. In addition, while we observed viral genomes increasing over time in PBMCs of rabbits infected with the WT virus, no viral copy could be detected in any time point after infection with any of the infectious doses of A7STOP-207 virus (Fig 9C and 9D). Antibody response analysis revealed the presence of neutralizing antibodies in all groups (S5 Fig), with a significantly enhanced response in rabbits infected with A7STOP-207. Thus, A7 and A8 are both indispensable for the induction of MCF in rabbits.

Fig 6. Impaired expression of A7 or A8 renders AlHV-1 unable to induce MCF.

Fig 6

(A-C) Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 (WT), A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159 or WC11. (D-F) Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of different doses (5×104, 2×105 or 8×105 PFU/rabbit) of C500 (WT) and A7STOP-207. (A and D) Cumulative incidence of MCF development. Popliteal lymph nodes (pLN) (B and E) and spleen (C and F) tissue mass were measured at the time of euthanasia. Bars represent mean ± SEM with data plotted for each individual rabbit. One-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (*P<0.05, ** P<0.01).

Fig 7. Histopathological characterization of MCF lesions.

Fig 7

Liver sections of one rabbit representative of each group are shown. White arrowheads indicate typical infiltrations of lymphoblastoid cells. Abbreviations: B, small bile ducts; Hp, hepatocytes; V, portal veins, Equivalent results were obtained in two independent experiments. Original magnifications are indicated.

Fig 8. Lack of A7 or A8 expression results in the absence of expansion of CD8+ T lymphocytes but persistence of viral infection after intravenous infection.

Fig 8

Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 BAC WT, BAC A7STOP-207, BAC A8STOP-159 or WC11. (A) Percentages of CD8+ T cells in PBMCs analyzed by flow cytometry at regular intervals throughout the experiment. Data are plotted for individual rabbits. (B) Percentages of CD8+ T cells in PBMCs, popliteal lymph nodes (pLN) and spleen at the time of euthanasia, as analyzed by flow cytometry. Data show mean ± SEM with data plotted for each individual rabbit. (C) qPCR of viral genome copies in PBMCs over time. (D) qPCR of viral genome copies in PBMCs, pLN, spleen, liver and lung tissues at the time of euthanasia. Real-time PCR quantification was normalized on 105 copies of the cellular β-globin gene sequence. Data are plotted as individual measurements. Bars show mean values. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).

Fig 9. Lack of A7 results in the absence of expansion of CD8+ T lymphocytes and viral persistence in peripheral blood after intranasal infection.

Fig 9

Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of different doses (5×104, 2×105 or 8×105 PFU per rabbit) of C500 BAC WT and BAC A7STOP-207. (A) Percentages of CD8+ T cells in PBMCs analyzed by flow cytometry at regular intervals throughout the experiment. Data are plotted for individual rabbits. (B) Percentages of CD8+ T cells in PBMCs, popliteal lymph nodes (pLN) and spleen at the time of euthanasia, as analyzed by flow cytometry. Data show mean ± SEM with data plotted for each individual rabbit. (C) qPCR of viral genome copies in PBMCs over time. (D) qPCR of viral genome copies in PBMCs, pLN and spleen at the time of euthanasia. Real-time PCR quantification was normalized on 105 copies of the cellular β-globin gene sequence. Data are plotted as individual measurements. Bars show mean values. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (***P<0.001).

Ex vivo infection of CD8+ T lymphocytes in absence of A7 and/or A8 expression

We further investigated the ability of AlHV-1 to directly infect bovine CD8+ T cells ex vivo in absence of A7 and/or A8 expression. Because viral titers remain low in cell culture, a co-culture assay was used where BT or EBL cells were infected with BAC+ C500 (WT), A7STOP-207, A8STOP or A7STOP-207A8STOP viruses at 24h before the addition of 2×106 bovine PBMCs or Theileria parva-immortalized CD8+CD4 T cells (CD8TpM). Because A8STOP titers were limited, we used an m.o.i. of 0.01 PFU/cell for all virus strains (Fig 10A), and an m.o.i. of 0.1 PFU/cell for BAC+ C500 (WT), A7STOP-207, or A7STOP-207A8STOP viruses (Fig 10B). After 48h co-culture, the percentages of eGFP+ cells were measured in CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry (Fig 10 and S6 Fig). At both m.o.i., A7STOP-207 virus could infect CD8+ T cell in all conditions and displayed higher percentages compared to C500 BAC WT virus at high m.o.i., probably due to its increased cell-free propagation observed in Fig 3 (Fig 10A and 10B). At low m.o.i, eGFP+CD8+ T cells could be detected at higher proportions after A8STOP infection compared to the mock control, and A7STOPA8STOP virus could also infect CD8+ T cells almost as efficiently as the C500 WT virus during co-culture in EBL cells while the proportions of eGFP+CD8+ T cells remained similar to A8STOP virus in BT co-cultures (Fig 10A and 10B). While these results suggested that AlHV-1 is able to enter CD8+ T cells in absence of A7 or A8 expression, the differential viral growth of the mutant strains does not allow a robust comparison in their intrinsic potential of infectivity. Thus, we repeated the co-culture assay by co-culturing CD8TpM with EBL cells infected with BAC+ C500 (WT) or A7STOP-207A8STOP viruses displaying similar growth after 4 days infection (Fig 10C). Similar proportions of eGFP+CD8+ T cells after 48h of co-culture were observed (Fig 10C). Thus, a lack of A7 or A8 does not significantly impair infection of CD8+ T cells in co-culture conditions.

Fig 10. Ex vivo infection of bovine CD8+ T lymphocytes by co-culture with infected BT or EBL cell.

Fig 10

(A and B) Pseudocolour contour plots showing the percentages of eGFP+ cells in gated CD8+ T lymphocytes (PBMCs or CD8TpM cell line) by flow cytometry after 48h co-culture with BT or EBL infected with C500 BAC+ WT, BAC+ A7STOP, BAC+ A8STOP or BAC+ A7STOPA8STOP viruses (A = m.o.i. = 0.01; B = m.o.i. = 0.1). (C) Representative pseudocolour contour plots of CD8TpM cells showing the percentages of eGFP+ cells after co-culture with EBL infected with C500 BAC+ WT or BAC+ A7STOPA8STOP virus. Bars show mean ±SD (n = 3). One-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s post-hoc test was used to identify significant differences (n.s. = not significant).

Discussion

The sequence of our WC11 seed stock is very similar to that of a German stock reported previously [38], with the addition of a region in LUR that is duplicated in a copy of TR [43]. It is also largely similar to the sequence of C500 [35, 36]. This suggests that the attenuation of WC11 may be due, at least in part, to the region of high divergence near the right end of LUR or to one or both of the two recognized deletions, including A1 gene, a cluster of 4 microRNAs [22], A7 and A8. Notwithstanding a potential role of A1, microRNAs 1–4 or divergent sequence in A9.5 and A10, we focused here on the observation that WC11 cannot express functional A7 or A8 proteins, which are orthologs of EBV envelope glycoproteins gp42 and gp350, respectively. Regulation of gp42 and gp350 expression is essential in the EBV lifecycle because these proteins are involved, together with gB and gH/gL, in viral tropism for B cells [26]. In silico analyses showed that the A7 and A8 proteins share important sequence and predicted structural similarities with gp42 and gp350, respectively, thus suggesting that these proteins are likely expressed in virions. Indeed, the A8 protein has been detected in purified C500 virions by proteomic analysis [46]. EBV gp350 and its orthologs in other gammaherpesviruses are major envelope glycoproteins that are highly expressed in the virion envelope [31,47,48]. Therefore, it is possible that A8 is also abundant in AlHV-1 virions explaining its detection by proteomics analyses whereas A7 could not be detected.

WC11 has been described as having lost its potential to induce MCF due to multiple passaging in cell culture [39], and such attenuation was associated in the present study with more efficient cell-free propagation in vitro. Similarly, high-passage stocks of C500 have been reported to have lost pathogenicity with enhanced cell-free virion production in vitro [49,50]. We and others have previously described the presence of genome rearrangements in C500 and viruses derived from the C500 (WT) BAC clone after propagation in vitro [36,49,50]. Thus, AlHV-1 attenuation is often associated with the selection of more efficient growth and cell-free transmission in vitro. The current study involved two bovine cell lines of respiratory origin, BT and EBL cells, to investigate the spread of WC11 and C500 in vitro in the presence or absence of A7 or A8. These experiments demonstrated that WC11 propagates largely in a cell-free manner, reaching high titers in comparison to C500. Moreover, BT cells were identified as being permissive to cell-fee propagation, whereas EBL cells largely propagated infectivity in a cell-associated manner. Using both cell lines, it appeared that A7 expression is essential for cell-associated propagation and syncytia formation, whereas A8 is involved in cell-free propagation in BT cells. These results were supported by the use of A7STOP, A8STOP and double A7STOPA8STOP mutant viruses. The lack of A7 expression resulted in increased viral growth in BT cells with increased levels of cell-free virions. Thus, although the lack of A7 generated very small plaques and impaired infectivity in EBL cells, viral propagation and entry were significantly enhanced in BT cells. Conversely, the absence of A8 had little effect on viral propagation and syncytia formation in EBL cells, but resulted in impaired viral growth in BT cells. Interestingly, double A7STOPA8STOP mutant virus was not able to reach growth kinetics similar to WC11 or even A7STOP in BT cells whereas it displayed a similar phenotype to the latter in EBL cells. These results illustrate the importance of both proteins in regulating viral propagation and may explain, while not completely, why WC11 lost both A7 and A8 while being selected for propagation in vitro. It is possible that A1 and microRNAs present in the left part of the genome or sequence divergence in A9.5 and 10 would explain the further enhanced fitness of WC11. Moreover, there remains a truncated part of A8 in WC11 that might still have a role in the attenuated strain. These hypotheses need to be addressed in future work. The results presented in this study also suggest that the A7 protein may mediate cell-to-cell viral spread through the promotion of membrane fusion and the retention of virions at the infected cell surface, whereas the A8 protein may trigger attachment of cell-fee virions to target cells in order to facilitate viral entry and propagation.

Among the few major differences between the WC11 and C500 sequences, the lack of A7 or A8 expression may explain the inability of WC11 to induce MCF. Interestingly, the roles of gp42 or gp350 in the regulation of EBV propagation and tropism in vitro have been investigated extensively [26], but their roles in the induction of EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disorders in vivo have not been investigated directly owing to the lack of a suitable animal model. Whereas gp350 orthologs are encoded in the majority of gammaherpesviruses, gp42 orthologs are present only in the genera Lymphocryptovirus, Percavirus and Macavirus. Infection of rabbits with C500 mutants unable to express A7 or A8 resulted in the absence of MCF development, with no hyperthermia and the absence of lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly, CD8+ T lymphocyte expansion and detectable viral genomes in lymphoid tissues. Although rabbits are not naturally susceptible to AlHV-1 infection, they develop clinical signs and lesions typical of MCF upon experimental infection and have been used extensively as a model for investigating the pathogenesis of the disease [1719,51]. Thus, infection of rabbits demonstrated that expression of both A7 and A8 is necessary to induce MCF lesions, including expansion of latently infected CD8+ T cells. While no or very low copy numbers of AlHV-1 were detected in peripheral blood and lymph nodes after infection with A7STOP, A8STOP or WC11, low level of viral genomes were still detectable in spleen, lung and liver tissues. Rabbits infected with pathogenic strain C500 showed characteristic infiltrates of lymphoblastic cells in the lung and liver, which likely contain a high proportion of latently infected CD8+ T cells [17,18]. However, rabbits infected with the A7STOP, A8STOP or WC11 viruses did not show MCF lesions but virus genomes were still detected. Thus, absence of A7 and/or A8 might affect viral spread to target CD8+ T cells in vivo while does not prevent AlHV-1 ability to persist in infected animals. The cellular niche of such persistence still needs to be uncovered. The presence of AlHV-1-specific antibodies, including neutralizing antibodies, further supports that all rabbits were effectively infected. Moreover, higher titers of neutralizing antibodies were observed in rabbits infected with A7STOP, which suggests that increased viral replication may have occurred at primary infection sites in vivo or that virions devoid of A7 may be more efficient at inducing neutralizing antibodies.

Based on our findings, it appears that A7 and/or A8 expression are necessary for AlHV-1 to induce MCF by regulating viral spread in vivo but we could not provide any functional evidence that A7 and/or A8 would be involved in the direct infection of CD8+ T lymphocytes. Indeed, in absence of A7 and/or A8, AlHV-1 could effectively infect bovine CD8+ T cells obtained from PBMCs or a CD8+ T cell line immortalized with the protozoa T. parva. These results were important as they provide a novel mechanistic insight on the role of those viral glycoproteins in regulating viral spread in vivo and reach target CD8+ T cells through an A7/A8-independent mechanism and induce their malignant proliferation. Although A7 and/or A8 could be involved in reprogramming CD8+ T lymphocytes upon infection, such hypothesis is highly unlikely as RNA expression of these genes could not be detected in lymph nodes of calves developing MCF [18].

We have shown that A7 and A8 encode orthologs of EBV gp42 and gp350, respectively, and that they tightly regulated cell-associated viral spread and cell-free viral propagation in two bovine cell lines of respiratory origin and were essential for inducing MCF. These results highlight the importance of targeting early events in gammaherpesvirus infection as a mean of intervention. Indeed, whereas the leading EBV vaccine antigen gp350 does not protect B cells from infection, recent development of a nanoparticle vaccine strategy involving the gH/gL/gp42 viral fusion machinery resulted in complete neutralization of epithelial cell and B cell infection by EBV [52]. Immunization of rabbits with a live, non-pathogenic, ORF73-deleted AlHV-1 strain has been shown to result in complete protection against a virulent challenge with AlHV-1 [18]. Development of inactivated vaccine strategies targeting the viral entry machinery and including A7 or A8 to prevent MCF development would open new avenues for cost-effective intervention against AlHV-1 in endangered species and livestock in regions where infection is endemic.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The experiments, maintenance and care of rabbits complied with the guidelines of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (CETS n° 123). The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Liège, Belgium (Permits #1127, 1571). All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Homology modeling of predicted protein structures

The three-dimensional structures of the A7 and A8 proteins were predicted on the basis of the crystal structures of EBV gp42 [53] and gp350 [47], respectively. The structures of gp42 (3FD4.PDB) and gp350 (2H6O.PDB) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org) and used as models to predict the putative folding of the extracellular domains of A7 and A8 using the protein structure and function predictions server I-TASSER (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/). Alignments of the resulting models displaying the highest C-score were performed using PyMol 1.3. Sequence alignments were obtained using CLC Sequence Viewer v.7.8.1.

Cell lines and viruses

Bovine turbinate (BT) fibroblasts (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) CRL-1390), embryonic bovine lung (EBL) cells (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) ACC192), MacT cells [54] and MacT-Cre cells [36] were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified essential medium (DMEM, Invitrogen Corporation). Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells (ATCC CCL-22) were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM). All cell lines were cultured in presence of 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS, BioWhittaker). AlHV-1 strains C500 (generated from the BAC clone; C500 (WT)) and WC11 were used in this study (strains C500 and WC11 were originally obtained from Prof. David M. Haig, University of Nottingham, UK). C500 BAC virus (WT) and derived mutants were maintained by limited passage (<5) in BT cells [44]. T. parva-immortalized CD8+ T cell clone 641 (CD3+CD4CD8+NKp46γδTCR) was maintained in RPMI-1640 containing 10% (v/v) FCS, 2-mercaptoethanol (2 mM) and gentamicin (50 μg/mL).

Production of A7 and A8 mutants

The C500 BAC WT clone was used to generate A7 and A8 nonsense mutants using the galactokinase gene (galk) as a selectable marker in E. coli by recombineering [55]. To produce the A7STOP BAC clones, a stop codon was introduced at the 5’ end of the A7 coding region. The A7STOP-39 BAC clone was produced by inserting a mutation resulting in an in-frame stop codon at position 49–51 (GenBank accession AF005370, nt 76618–76620). Because the 5’-end of the A7 sequence is present in a duplicated region, and to minimize the risk of reversion, a A7STOP-207 mutant with an in-frame stop codon at position 207–209 (GenBank accession AF005370, nt 76777–76779) was also generated. The galK gene was introduced via a recombination fragment generated by PCR using the pgalK plasmid as template and chimeric primers A7-NS-galkFwd39 or A7-NS-galkFwd207 and A7-NS-galkRev39 or A7-NS-galkRev307 (S3 Table). Then, oligonucleotides A7-NS-oligoFwd39 or A7-NS-galkFwd207 and A7-NS-oligoRev39 or A7-NS-galkRev207 were annealed to introduce the mutations and an EcoRI restriction site by galk-dependent negative selection. A similar strategy was employed to produce the A8STOP BAC, using primers A8-NS-galkFwd and A8-NS-galkRev to insert galK into the target site. Then, oligonucleotides A8-NS-oligoFwd and A8-NS-oligoRev were annealed in order to insert a mutation and an EcoRI restriction site. To generate A7STOPA8STOP double mutants, an identical strategy was used to insert STOP codons in A7 coding sequence in the A8STOP-159 BAC clone. All strains were reconstituted into viruses by transfection into MacT (to generate BAC+ viruses) and MacT-cre (to generate BAC viruses) cells before propagating in BT cells. BAC+ viruses were used in experiments in vitro to use eGFP as a reporter protein to monitor viral infection and BAC viruses were used in experiments in vivo.

Southern blotting

DNA preparations were digested with EcoRI, separated on a 0.7% agarose gel, and transferred to a Amersham Hybond-XL membrane (GE Healthcare) by capillary transfer as described previously [17]. DNA fragments containing A7 or A8 were detected using hybridization probes generated by PCR using primers A7-165F and A7-303R or A8-ATGF and A8-278R, respectively. Probes were generated with α-[32P] dCTP (specific activity, 3000 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) using the random-primed DNA labeling kit (Roche).

DNA sequencing

WC11 and viruses generated from C500 BAC clones were grown in BT cells and purified from the medium by ultracentrifugation (100,000×g) through a 30% (w/v) sucrose cushion for 2h at 4°C. DNA was extracted from the pelleted virus [44]. BAC clone DNA was purified using the Large Construct DNA prep kit (Qiagen). Paired-ended sequence reads of 250 nt (WC11) or 150 nt (C500 BAC mutants and viruses derived therefrom) were generated using a MiSeq DNA sequencer running version 2 chemistry (Illumina) and assembled using methods described previously [36] (S2 Table).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The sequence and annotation of the full sequence of the strain WC11 was deposited in GenBank under accession number KX905136.2.

cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from infected cells using a RNeasy miniprep kit (Qiagen) and treated with DNAse I using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion) to remove remaining DNA. Then, 300 ng RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Reactions lacking reverse transcriptase were carried out in order to confirm the absence of viral DNA in subsequent PCR reactions. Quantitative PCR reactions were performed using primer pairs A7-476F/deltastopR and A8-1661F/deltastopR (S3 Table) and iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad).

Multistep growth curves.

Cells were infected (m.o.i. = 0.01 PFU/cell), and medium and cells were harvested at successive intervals. The total amount of infectious viral particles (PFU) was determined by plaque assay as described previously [18].

Plaque size assay.

Cells grown on glass coverslips were infected and overlaid after 3h with DMEM containing 10% (v/v) FCS and 0.6% (w/v) carboxymethylcellulose (CMC; Sigma). Plaque areas were then fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) before being permeabilized in PBS containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40. Then, monolayers were stained using anti-AlHV-1 rabbit polyserum as primary antibody (1:500 dilution) followed by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Thermo Fischer, 2 μg/mL). In some experiments, mouse monoclonal antibody IgG2b clone 15-A was used as primary antibody (2 μg/mL) followed by Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Thermo Fischer, 2 μg/mL). Microphotographs were taken using an epifluorescence microscope using the system described below. Areas were then measured using ImageJ v1.46q as described previously [8].

Infectivity assay

BT or EBL cells (2×105 cells/well) were inoculated with BAC+ viruses (m.o.i. = 0.05 PFU/cell) before washing three times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at different time-points after inoculation. At 20 h post-infection, the cells were trypsinized and single-cell suspensions analyzed by flow cytometry to obtain the percentage of eGFP+ cells. Dead cells were excluded using 7-aminoactynomycin D (7-AAD, Sigma Aldrich).

Infection of rabbits

Intravenous inoculations were performed by administering the equivalent of 50 cm2 of infected BT cells displaying >90% cytopathic effect per rabbit, as described previously [17]. To measure the infectivity of the live cell inoculum administered intravenously to the rabbits, infectious center assays (ICA) was performed as previously described [17]. IC numbers were obtained for each inoculum (WT: 2.0×104, A8STOP: 2.1×104, A7STOP: 1.1×105, WC11: 0.9×105 ICs/rabbit). Intranasal inoculations of different doses (5×104, 2×105, 8×105 PFU per rabbit) were performed by administering concentrated virus via instillation in 0.5 mL DMEM into the nostrils of anesthetized rabbits [23]. Rabbits were monitored daily for clinical signs. In compliance with bioethical guidance, rabbits were euthanized when rectal temperature remained higher than 40°C for 2 days consecutively.

Leukocyte cell suspension preparation

Rabbit PBMCs were isolated from 5 mL blood collected from the central artery of the rabbit ear before infection and at various time-points post-infection. Immediately after euthanasia, single-cell suspensions were prepared from popliteal lymph nodes and spleen as follows. Tissues were gently disrupted with scissors in sterile RPMI-1640 medium and passed through a 70 μm cell-strainer using a 1-mL syringe plunger. Mononuclear leukocyte suspensions were prepared from peripheral blood and tissue samples using Ficoll-Paque Premium density gradient medium (GE Healthcare). Each 5 mL single-cell suspension was diluted 1:1 in sterile PBS, overlaid onto a 5 mL Ficoll-Paque density cushion, and centrifuged (1825×g) for 20 min at room temperature. Mononuclear leukocytes at the interface were collected and washed in ice-cold PBS before further analysis. Bovine blood was obtained from a healthy donor of CARE-FEPEX ("Cellule d’Appui à la Recherche et à l’Enseignement–Ferme Pédagogique et Experimentale", Dr L. Martinelle) and PBMCs isolated on Ficoll-Paque density gradient using SepMate isolation tubes (STEMCELL technologies).

Quantification of viral genomes

Total DNA was extracted from single-cell suspensions in PBS (PBMCs and popliteal lymph nodes) or tissue biopsies (spleen, liver and lung) using the QiaAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen). Before DNA extraction, tissues were homogenized using a TissueLyzer II (Qiagen). Then, AlHV-1 DNA copies were quantified using an AlHV-1 ORF3 real-time PCR and normalized to the cellular beta-globin sequence, as described previously [10], using iQ Supermix (Bio-Rad) and a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad).

Antibodies and flow cytometry

Multi-colour flow cytometry analysis was performed as described previously [19]. Briefly, cells were incubated with a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies against rabbit CD4 (IgG2a, KEN-4), CD8 (IgG1, 12C.7) and IgM (IgG1, NRBM) on ice for 10 min. Cells were washed and further incubated for 10 min on ice with isotype-specific phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated rat anti-mouse IgG1 (A85-1, BD) and biotinylated rat anti-mouse IgG2a (R19-15, BD) antibodies. After a third wash, cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit T cells (KEN-5), washed with allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated streptavidin (BD), and suspended in 7-AAD. Antibodies were from AbD-Serotec. Bovine CD8+ T cells were identified as previously described [18], and dead cells detected with BD Horizon Fixable Viability Stain 450 (BD biosciences). Data were acquired using a Fortessa X20 flow cytometer (BD) and analyzed using Flowjo v10.0.7 (Treestar).

Seroneutralization

Serum dilutions were incubated with C500 BAC+ virus (100 PFU/50 uL serum dilution) for 2h at 37°C. MDBK cells were then incubated with the neutralized inoculum and overlaid after 3 h with DMEM containing 10% (v/v) FCS and 0.6% (w/v) CMC.

Histological analysis

Organ explants from mock-infected or infected rabbits were fixed in 10% (v/v) buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Five-micron sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin prior to microscopic analysis.

Microscopy

Microscopic analyses were performed using epifluorescence DM2000 LED microscope (Leica) equipped with a DF450 C camera (Leica) or an Eclipse TE2000-S inverted microscope (Nikon) equipped with a DC 300F camera (Leica). Images were acquired using the Leica Application Suite 4.2 software (Leica).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism v6.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Glycosylation prediction.

Glycosylation sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) and NetOGlyc 4.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/) glycosylation site predictors.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Sequence analysis of the AlHV-1 strain C500 A7 and A8 proteins.

(A) Clustal Omega was used to align the primary amino acid sequences of the A7 protein and EBV gp42. The C-type lectin-like domain is highlighted in yellow (InterPro Protein sequence analysis & classification - https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). Conserved residues are shown in red. (B) Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular domain of the A7 protein based on the structure of EBV gp42 [53]. (C) Clustal Omega was used to align the primary amino acid sequences of the A8 protein and EBV gp350. The extracellular domain is highlighted in yellow. (D) Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular domain of the A8 protein based on the structure of EBV gp350 [47]. Transmembrane domains are highlighted in cyan (TMHMM Server v. 2.0), and conserved residues are shown in red.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Production of AlHV-1 mutants impaired for A7 or A8 expression.

(A) The C500 BAC clone (WT) was used to produce the A7STOP-39, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159, A7STOP-39A8STOP-159 and A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 BAC clones by mutagenesis. Galactokinase (galK)-based recombineering methodology for positive and negative selection was used to introduce an in-frame stop codon into the A7 or A8 coding sequence followed by an EcoRI restriction site (in italics). The stop codons generated are in bold font and underlined in red. A7STOP-39A8STOP-159 and A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 BAC clones were produced from A8STOP-159 BAC clone. (B) Southern blotting of the BAC clones generated. The A7 and A8 probes were produced by PCR as described in Methods. EtBr indicates ethidium bromide-stained lanes prior to blotting. The entire gel and Southern blots are displayed. (C) Sequence alignments of the mutagenesis performed to generate the mutants and the sequencing data obtained for BAC clones (Plasmid) and the BAC viruses (Virus) generated from them. The first nucleotide of start codons is shown in bold black font and the stop codons are shown in bold red font. The positions of frameshifts in amino acid sequences are shown by bold red asterisks.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Monitoring of body temperature over time.

(A) Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 BAC WT, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159 or WC11 virus. (B) Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of different doses (5×104, 2×105 or 8×105 PFU per rabbit) of C500 BAC WT and A7STOP-207 virus.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Neutralizing antibody response.

(A) Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 BAC WT, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159 or WC11 virus. (B) Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of 5×104 PFU per rabbit of C500 BAC WT and A7STOP-207virus. Serum samples were tested for neutralizing antibodies at day 7, 14 and 21.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Gating strategy for CD8+ T cells (PBMCs or CD8TpM) after co-culture with BT or EBL cells.

(TIF)

S1 Table. AlHV-1 strain WC11 genome organization compared to other Macaviruses.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Whole AlHV-1 genome sequencing data.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Oligonucleotides.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

B.G.D. is a Research Associate of the "Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique" (F.R.S.-FNRS). The authors are thankful to Lola Dechêne, Lorène Dams, Cédric Delforge, Aurélie Vanderlinden and Emeline Deglaire for excellent technical assistance.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the following grants: BGD was supported through FSR-"credit classique" from the University of Liège (FSR-S-SS-16/20) and Incentive Grant for Scientific Research "MAGIL" from the F.R.S.-FNRS (F.4501.15). AJD is funded through Medical Research Council (MRC) Programme Grant (MC_UU_12014/3). BGD is a research associate of the F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Damania B. Oncogenic gamma-herpesviruses: comparison of viral proteins involved in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2: 656–668. 10.1038/nrmicro958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dittmer DP, Damania B. Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus: immunobiology, oncogenesis, and therapy. J Clin Invest. 2016;126: 3165–3175. 10.1172/JCI84418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verma SC, Robertson ES. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003/05/29. 2003;222: 155–163. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12770701 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00261-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mesri EA, Feitelson MA, Munger K. Human viral oncogenesis: a cancer hallmarks analysis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15: 266–282. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thorley-Lawson DA, Gross A. Persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus and the origins of associated lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 1328–1337. 10.1056/NEJMra032015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Münz C. Humanized mouse models for Epstein Barr virus infection. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;25: 113–118. 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gillet L, Frederico B, Stevenson PG. Host entry by gamma-herpesviruses—lessons from animal viruses? Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15: 34–40. 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barton E, Mandal P, Speck SH. Pathogenesis and host control of gammaherpesviruses: lessons from the mouse. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011/01/12. 2011;29: 351–397. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-072710-081639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plowright W. Malignant Catarrhal Fever in East Africa. Ii. Observations on Wildebeest Calves at the Laboratory and Contact Transmission of the Infection to Cattle. Res Vet Sci. 1965;6: 69–83. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14281669 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mushi EZ, Rossiter PB, Karstad L, Jessett DM. The demonstration of cell-free malignant catarrhal fever herpesvirus in wildebeest nasal secretions. J Hyg. 1980/10/01. 1980;85: 175–179. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=7451957 10.1017/s0022172400063208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Plowright W. Malignant Catarrhal Fever in East Africa. I. Behaviour of the Virus in Free-Living Populations of Blue Wildebeest (Gorgon Taurinus Taurinus, Burchell). Res Vet Sci. 1965/01/01. 1965;6: 56–68. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=14281668 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lankester F, Lugelo A, Kazwala R, Keyyu J, Cleaveland S, Yoder J. The economic impact of malignant catarrhal fever on pastoralist livelihoods. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0116059 10.1371/journal.pone.0116059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nthiwa D, Alonso S, Odongo D, Kenya E, Bett B. A participatory epidemiological study of major cattle diseases amongst Maasai pastoralists living in wildlife-livestock interfaces in Maasai Mara, Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod. Springer Netherlands; 2019;51 10.1007/s11250-018-01790-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mlilo D, Mhlanga M, Mwembe R, Sisito G, Moyo B, Sibanda B. The epidemiology of malignant catarrhal fever (MCF) and contribution to cattle losses in farms around Rhodes Matopos National Park, Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Heal Prod. 2015;47: 989–994. 10.1007/s11250-015-0821-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Castro AE, Heuschele WP. Conference on malignant catarrhal fever. Bov Pract. 1985;20: 162–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dewals BG, Boudry C, Farnir F, Drion P, Vanderplasschen A. Malignant catarrhal fever induced by alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 is associated with proliferation of CD8+ T cells supporting a latent infection. 3rd ESVV Vet Herpesvirus Symp. Université de Liège—ULiège > > Immunologie et vaccinologie >: Public Library of Science; 2009;3: e1627 10.1371/journal.pone.0001627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dewals B, Myster F, Palmeira L, Gillet L, Ackermann M, Vanderplasschen A. Ex vivo bioluminescence detection of alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 infection during malignant catarrhal fever. J Virol. 2011/05/20. 2011;85: 6941–6954. 10.1128/JVI.00286-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Palmeira L, Sorel O, Van Campe W, Boudry C, Roels S, Myster F, et al. An essential role for gamma-herpesvirus latency-associated nuclear antigen homolog in an acute lymphoproliferative disease of cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013/05/01. 2013;110: E1933–42. 10.1073/pnas.1216531110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dewals BGBG, Vanderplasschen A. Malignant catarrhal fever induced by Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 is characterized by an expansion of activated CD3+CD8+CD4- T cells expressing a cytotoxic phenotype in both lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues. Vet Res. Université de Liège—ULiège > > Immunologie et vaccinologie; 2011;42: 95 10.1186/1297-9716-42-95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fleckenstein B, Ensser A. Gammaherpesviruses of New World primates In: Arvin A, Campadelli-Fiume G, Mocarski E, Moore PS, Roizman B, Whitley R, et al. , editors. Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21348092 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sorel O, Chen T, Myster F, Javaux J, Vanderplasschen A, Dewals BGBG. Macavirus latency-associated protein evades immune detection through regulation of protein synthesis in cis depending upon its glycin/glutamate-rich domain. PLoS Pathog. > >: Public Library of Science; 2017;13: e1006691 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sorel O, Tuddenham L, Myster F, Palmeira L, Kerkhofs P, Pfeffer S, et al. Small RNA deep sequencing identifies viral microRNAs during malignant catarrhal fever induced by alcelaphine herpesvirus 1. J Gen Virol. Université de Liège > > Immunologie et vaccinologie >: Society for General Microbiology; 2015;96: 3360–3372. 10.1099/jgv.0.000272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Myster F, Palmeira L, Sorel O, Bouillenne F, DePauw E, Schwartz-Cornil I, et al. Viral semaphorin inhibits dendritic cell phagocytosis and migration but is not essential for gammaherpesvirus-induced lymphoproliferation in malignant catarrhal fever. J Virol. 2015;89: 3630–3647. 10.1128/JVI.03634-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boudry C, Markine-Goriaynoff N, Delforge C, Springael J-Y, de Leval L, Drion P, et al. The A5 gene of alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 encodes a constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptor that is non-essential for the induction of malignant catarrhal fever in rabbits. J Gen Virol. 2007;88 10.1099/vir.0.83153-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Parameswaran N, Dewals BG, Giles TC, Deppmann C, Blythe M, Vanderplasschen A, et al. The A2 gene of alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 is a transcriptional regulator affecting cytotoxicity in virus-infected T cells but is not required for malignant catarrhal fever induction in rabbits. Virus Res. > >; 2014; Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2268/166279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Connolly SA, Jackson JO, Jardetzky TS, Longnecker R. Fusing structure and function: a structural view of the herpesvirus entry machinery. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9: 369–381. 10.1038/nrmicro2548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shannon-Lowe C, Rowe M. Epstein Barr virus entry; kissing and conjugation. Curr Opin Virol. Elsevier; 2014;4: 78–84. 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tanner J, Weis J, Fearon D, Whang Y, Kieff E. Epstein-barr virus gp350/220 binding to the B lymphocyte C3d receptor mediates adsorption, capping, and endocytosis. Cell. Cell Press; 1987;50: 203–213. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90216-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.de Lima BD, May JS, Stevenson PG. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 lacking gp150 shows defective virion release but establishes normal latency in vivo. J Virol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2004;78: 5103–12. 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5103-5112.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zeippen C, Javaux J, Xiao X, Ledecq M, Mast J, Farnir F, et al. The Major Envelope Glycoprotein of Murid Herpesvirus 4 Promotes Sexual Transmission. J Virol. 2017;91 10.1128/JVI.00235-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Machiels B, Lete C, Guillaume A, Mast J, Stevenson PG, Vanderplasschen A, et al. Antibody evasion by a gammaherpesvirus O-glycan shield. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1002387 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Machiels B, Stevenson PG, Vanderplasschen A, Gillet L. A gammaherpesvirus uses alternative splicing to regulate its tropism and its sensitivity to neutralization. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9: e1003753 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Borza CM, Hutt-Fletcher LM. Alternate replication in B cells and epithelial cells switches tropism of Epstein-Barr virus. Nat Med. 2002;8: 594–599. 10.1038/nm0602-594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Plowright W, Herniman KA, Jessett DM, Kalunda M, Rampton CS. Immunisation of cattle against the herpesvirus of malignant catarrhal fever: failure of inactivated culture vaccines with adjuvant. Res Vet Sci. 1975/09/01. 1975;19: 159–166. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=1166120 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Plowright W, Macadam RF, Armstrong JA. Growth and Characterization of the Virus of Bovine Malignant Catarrhal Fever in East Africa. J Gen Microbiol. 1965/05/01. 1963;39: 253–266. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=14324970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Myster F, Van Beurden SJSJ, Sorel O, Suárez NM, Vanderplasschen A, Davison AJAJ, et al. Genomic duplication and translocation of reactivation transactivator and bZIP-homolog genes is a conserved event in alcelaphine herpesvirus 1. Sci Rep. Université de Liège > > Immunologie et vaccinologie >; 2016;6: 38607 10.1038/srep38607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ensser A, Pflanz R, Fleckenstein B. Primary structure of the alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genome. J Virol. 1997;71: 6517–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ensser A. Genome Sequence of the Alcelaphine Gammaherpesvirus 1 Attenuated Laboratory Strain WC11. Genome Announc. American Society for Microbiology; 2017;5: e01219–17. 10.1128/genomeA.01219-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bridgen A, Herring AJ, Inglis NF, Reid HW. Preliminary characterization of the alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genome. J Gen Virol. 1989/05/01. 1989;70 (Pt 5): 1141–1150. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=2732713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Plowright W. Malignant catarrhal fever In: Dinter Z. MB, editor. Virus infections of ruminants. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1968. pp. 123–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Russell GC. Malignant Catarrhal Fever Virus (Alcelaphine Herpesvirus Type 1) In: Dongyou Liu, editor. Manual of security sensitive microbes and toxins. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. pp. 679–688. 10.1201/b16752 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.AlHajri SM, Cunha CW, Nicola A V, Aguilar HC, Li H, Taus NS. Ovine Herpesvirus 2 Glycoproteins B, H, and L Are Sufficient for, and Viral Glycoprotein Ov8 Can Enhance, Cell-Cell Membrane Fusion. J Virol. American Society for Microbiology Journals; 2017;91 10.1128/JVI.02454-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Machiels B, Lété C, Defays K, Mast J, Dewals BG, Stevenson PG, et al. Bovine Herpesvirus 4 Bo10 gene encodes a nonessential viral envelope protein that regulates viral tropism through both positive and negative effects. J Virol. Université de Liège—ULiège > > Immunologie et vaccinologie >: American Society for Microbiology (ASM); 2011;85: 1011–1024. 10.1128/JVI.01092-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dewals B, Boudry C, Gillet L, Markine-Goriaynoff N, de Leval L, Haig DM, et al. Cloning of the genome of alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 as an infectious and pathogenic bacterial artificial chromosome. J Gen Virol. 2006;87 10.1099/vir.0.81465-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li H, Shen DT, Davis WC, Knowles DP, Gorham JR, Crawford TB. Identification and characterization of the major proteins of malignant catarrhal fever virus. J Gen Virol. 1995/01/01. 1995;76 (Pt 1): 123–129. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=7844521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dry I, Haig DM, Inglis NF, Imrie L, Stewart JP, Russell GC. Proteomic analysis of pathogenic and attenuated alcelaphine herpesvirus 1. J Virol. 2008/03/21. 2008;82: 5390–5397. JVI.00094-08 [pii] 10.1128/JVI.00094-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Szakonyi G, Klein MG, Hannan JP, Young KA, Ma RZ, Asokan R, et al. Structure of the Epstein-Barr virus major envelope glycoprotein. Nat Struct Mol Biol. Nature Publishing Group; 2006;13: 996–1001. 10.1038/nsmb1161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gillet L, Frederico B, Stevenson PG. Host entry by gamma-herpesviruses—lessons from animal viruses? Curr Opin Virol. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;15: 34–40. 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Handley JA, Sargan DR, Herring AJ, Reid HW. Identification of a region of the alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 genome associated with virulence for rabbits. Vet Microbiol. 1995/11/01. 1995;47: 167–181. 0378-1135(95)00105-J [pii] 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00105-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wright H, Stewart JP, Ireri RG, Campbell I, Pow I, Reid HW, et al. Genome re-arrangements associated with loss of pathogenicity of the γ-herpesvirus alcelaphine herpesvirus-1. Res Vet Sci. 2003;75: 163–168. 10.1016/s0034-5288(03)00043-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li H, Cunha CWCW, Gailbreath KLLKL, O’Toole D, White SNSN, Vanderplasschen A, et al. Characterization of ovine herpesvirus 2-induced malignant catarrhal fever in rabbits. Vet Microbiol. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 2011;150: 270–277. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wei Bu A, Gordon Joyce M, Nguyen H, Nabel GJ, Kanekiyo M, Cohen Correspondence JI, et al. Immunization with Components of the Viral Fusion Apparatus Elicits Antibodies That Neutralize Epstein-Barr Virus in B Cells and Epithelial Cells Article Immunization with Components of the Viral Fusion Apparatus Elicits Antibodies That Neutralize Epstein-. Immunity. 2019;50: 1305–1316.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kirschner AN, Sorem J, Longnecker R, Jardetzky TS. Structure of Epstein-Barr Virus Glycoprotein 42 Suggests a Mechanism for Triggering Receptor-Activated Virus Entry. Structure. Cell Press; 2009;17: 223–233. 10.1016/j.str.2008.12.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huynh HT, Robitaille G, Turner JD. Establishment of bovine mammary epithelial cells (MAC-T): an in vitro model for bovine lactation. Exp Cell Res. 1991/12/01. 1991;197: 191–199. 10.1016/0014-4827(91)90422-q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Warming S, Costantino N, Court DL, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. Simple and highly efficient BAC recombineering using galK selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005/02/26. 2005;33: e36 33/4/e36 [pii] 10.1093/nar/gni035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Paul D Ling, Erik K Flemington

31 Oct 2019

Dear Prof. Dewals,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genes A7 and A8 regulate viral spread and are essential for malignant catarrhal fever" (PPATHOGENS-D-19-01549) for review by PLOS Pathogens. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the manuscript as it currently stands. These issues must be addressed before we would be willing to consider a revised version of your study. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

I am returning your manuscript with two reviews. The reviewers came to different conclusions about the paper, as you will see. After reading the reviews and looking at the manuscript, I recommend Major Revision based on the critiques from the more critical reviews. I am sorry I cannot be more positive at the moment, however we are looking forward to receiving your revision. With a lot of work, the manuscript will be suitable for a resubmission, if you so wish to do so.

Please pay particular attention to the following reviewer suggestions and give them due consideration:

-Comments related to generation of a double mutant and the design of the rabbit studies to distinguish between access versus reprogramming of T cells

-provide data for infection of bovine and rabbit T cells as described by reviewer 2

Your revisions should address the specific major and minor points made by each reviewer.

In addition, when you are ready to resubmit, please be prepared to provide the following:

(1) A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

(2) Two versions of the manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Additionally, to enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we ask that you let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Revised manuscripts received beyond 60 days may require evaluation and peer review similar to that applied to newly submitted manuscripts.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage, but if you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

Paul D. Ling, Ph.D.

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Erik Flemington

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Grant McFadden

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-3526

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This paper describes an analysis of the attenuated AlHV1 strain WC11 and of the production and phenotypes of two BAC clone with stop mutations in genes deleted in WC11. The study is an important step forward in understanding the basis of attenuation in MCF viruses. It provides a well written and thorough analysis of the A7 and A8 genes, showing that these proteins mediate cell-free and cell-associated modes of propagation and that loss of either function leads to loss of virulence for MCF.

The paper is suitable for publication in its current state but may benefit from minor modifications as described in the comments for authors.

Reviewer #2: Myster and coauthors address the genetic differences between the pathogenic C500 and an attenuated WC11 strain of the Macavirus Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1). AlHV-1 and Ovine Herpesvirus 2 induces malignant catarrhal fever in susceptible ruminants and in rabbits. In cattle and rabbits, MCF is characterized by proliferation of CD8+ T-cells, a lymphoproliferative disease with strong similarity to the pathology caused by the New World primate viruses herpesvirus saimiri and ateles in tamarins and marmosets (which is overlooked in the introduction). They focus on one of three major differences between the pathogenic and the attenuated strains, the putative glycoproteins encoded by ORFs A7 and A8, which are both lacking in the attenuated WC11 strain. Individual bacmid-technology based mutants of each of A7 and A8 were generated in the C500 strain and compared to C500 and the A7 and A8 deleted WC11 in vitro and in vivo. Although no marker rescue viruses were made, the recombinants were sequenced and the data obtained with the mutants seems consistent. However, the important rabbit experiments do not discriminate between an inability to spread efficiently in the rabbits, failure to gain access to CD8 T cell populations or an inability to reprogram such cells toward lymphoproliferation.

The authors provide an extensive comparison of the replicative behavior of C500, WC11 and two A7, one A8 mutants and mutants. Herein, depending on the cell culture system, the A7 mutants show an intermediate phenotype, increasing cell free propagation, while A8 seems to be required for cell associated spread. This may e.g. reflect alternative receptor usage for entry in these culture systems.

Finally, rabbit experiments show that the C500 A7stop, A8stop and, as expected, attenuated WC11 do not induce MCF or CD8 T cell lymphoproliferation in this experimental model. They provide evidence all strains were able to infect rabbits, by serology and detection of viral genomes. The mutants and attenuated WC11, however, were only detectable at very low levels in the spleen, and not in circulating PBMC or lymph node.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Critical points

- Why did they not make / analyze a double A7 and A8 stop mutant, corresponding to the situation in WC11? If the double mutant would show a replicative behavior even more similar to WC11, this would be important with respect to possible influence of the other two major genetic differences, which are located on the left and right genome ends, i.e. the absent putative ORF A1 and the variable ORFs A9.5 and A10?

- The rabbit experiments do not discriminate between an inability to spread efficiently in the rabbits, failure to gain access to CD8 T cell populations or an inability to reprogram such cells toward lymphoproliferation. There was no monitoring for viral spread (genome copies in blood?) during the infection experiment, only at endpoint. Thereby, vastly different time points are compared, and the low levels of virus genomes observed with A7 and A8 stop mutants and WC11 may reflect long term immune control of latent infection, compared to an acute disease with multiple virus genomes in the CD8 population.

- In vitro infection (or by cocultivation) of bovine or rabbit CD8 T-cells with the EGFP marker viruses (or by infection followed by PCR) could demonstrate whether this is a matter of entry/access to this population.

- Cells injected intravenously, if not phagocytosed or killed the immune cells, may end in small vessels of lung, spleen, liver etc. where they may infect neighboring tissue, not necessarily T cells. Similarly, after intranasal infection, local infection and spread is critical, and T cells are unlikely to be the first cells encountering a pathogen.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Minor issues

Line 150. Please be explicit. Clarify whether the LUR or TR copies are meant

Line 153. Please specify German WC11 stock to distinguish from the stock sequenced here

Line 157-8. please clarify text here, as this point may be unclear to some readers

Line 160. "during multiple passages" rather than ‘following multiple passages’

Lines 194-209. the authors should acknowledge previous publications describing the similarity between A7/A8 and gp42/350 (Russell, 2014. In: Manual of Security Sensitive Microbes and Toxins. CRC Press; https://www.crcpress.com/Manual-of-Security-Sensitive-Microbes-and-Toxins/Liu/p/book/9780367378745); and the function of the A8 homolog Ov8 in membrane fusion (AlHajri, 2017. J.Virol. 91:e02454-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02454-16).

Line 217. In the BAC mutation description it is important that you show that both TR and LUR gene copies of A7 & A8 were mutated, or explain why this was not required

Line 251. Fluorescence microscopy and use of antibody 15A are not mentioned in methods

Line 300. is ref 43 intended? Maybe should be 35?

Line 302. While it’s completely acceptable to choose to study A7/A8, I think it is important that the authors mention why there was no focus on A1 in this work.

Line 342. I don’t feel that sup fig 4 is necessary

Reviewer #2: Minor points:

- Figs 1,3,4 are more suitable for supplement.

- For intravenous injection, infected tissue culture cells are used, while the authors refer to pfu for intranasal infection?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: George C. Russell

Reviewer #2: No

Decision Letter 1

Paul D Ling, Erik K Flemington

17 Feb 2020

Dear Prof. Dewals,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genes A7 and A8 regulate viral spread and are essential for malignant catarrhal fever' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch within two working days with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Paul D. Ling, Ph.D.

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Erik Flemington

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Paul D Ling, Erik K Flemington

10 Mar 2020

Dear Prof. Dewals,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 genes A7 and A8 regulate viral spread and are essential for malignant catarrhal fever," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Glycosylation prediction.

    Glycosylation sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) and NetOGlyc 4.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/) glycosylation site predictors.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Sequence analysis of the AlHV-1 strain C500 A7 and A8 proteins.

    (A) Clustal Omega was used to align the primary amino acid sequences of the A7 protein and EBV gp42. The C-type lectin-like domain is highlighted in yellow (InterPro Protein sequence analysis & classification - https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). Conserved residues are shown in red. (B) Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular domain of the A7 protein based on the structure of EBV gp42 [53]. (C) Clustal Omega was used to align the primary amino acid sequences of the A8 protein and EBV gp350. The extracellular domain is highlighted in yellow. (D) Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the extracellular domain of the A8 protein based on the structure of EBV gp350 [47]. Transmembrane domains are highlighted in cyan (TMHMM Server v. 2.0), and conserved residues are shown in red.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Production of AlHV-1 mutants impaired for A7 or A8 expression.

    (A) The C500 BAC clone (WT) was used to produce the A7STOP-39, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159, A7STOP-39A8STOP-159 and A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 BAC clones by mutagenesis. Galactokinase (galK)-based recombineering methodology for positive and negative selection was used to introduce an in-frame stop codon into the A7 or A8 coding sequence followed by an EcoRI restriction site (in italics). The stop codons generated are in bold font and underlined in red. A7STOP-39A8STOP-159 and A7STOP-207A8STOP-159 BAC clones were produced from A8STOP-159 BAC clone. (B) Southern blotting of the BAC clones generated. The A7 and A8 probes were produced by PCR as described in Methods. EtBr indicates ethidium bromide-stained lanes prior to blotting. The entire gel and Southern blots are displayed. (C) Sequence alignments of the mutagenesis performed to generate the mutants and the sequencing data obtained for BAC clones (Plasmid) and the BAC viruses (Virus) generated from them. The first nucleotide of start codons is shown in bold black font and the stop codons are shown in bold red font. The positions of frameshifts in amino acid sequences are shown by bold red asterisks.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Monitoring of body temperature over time.

    (A) Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 BAC WT, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159 or WC11 virus. (B) Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of different doses (5×104, 2×105 or 8×105 PFU per rabbit) of C500 BAC WT and A7STOP-207 virus.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Neutralizing antibody response.

    (A) Rabbits were infected by intravenous inoculation with 50 cm2 of mock-infected BT cells or cells infected with C500 BAC WT, A7STOP-207, A8STOP-159 or WC11 virus. (B) Rabbits were infected by intranasal inoculation of 5×104 PFU per rabbit of C500 BAC WT and A7STOP-207virus. Serum samples were tested for neutralizing antibodies at day 7, 14 and 21.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Gating strategy for CD8+ T cells (PBMCs or CD8TpM) after co-culture with BT or EBL cells.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. AlHV-1 strain WC11 genome organization compared to other Macaviruses.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Whole AlHV-1 genome sequencing data.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. Oligonucleotides.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES