Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Mar 26;9(13):e01466-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01466-19

Sequencing and Characterization of Five Extensively Drug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi Isolates Implicated in Human Infections from Punjab, Pakistan

Kaitlin A Tagg a, Afreenish Amir b,, Aamer Ikram b, Jessica C Chen c, Justin Y Kim c,d, Elizabeth Meservey a, Yoo J Joung c,d,*, Jessica L Halpin c, Dhwani Batra c, Molly M Leeper c, Lee S Katz c,e, Asim Saeed b, Molly Freeman c, Louise Francois Watkins c, Muhammad Salman b, Jason P Folster c
Editor: David A Baltrusf
PMCID: PMC7098906  PMID: 32217683

A large outbreak of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi infections is ongoing in Pakistan, predominantly in Sindh Province. Here, we report the sequencing and characterization of five XDR Salmonella Typhi isolates from the Punjab province of Pakistan that are closely related to the outbreak strain and carry the same IncY plasmid.

ABSTRACT

A large outbreak of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi infections is ongoing in Pakistan, predominantly in Sindh Province. Here, we report the sequencing and characterization of five XDR Salmonella Typhi isolates from the Punjab province of Pakistan that are closely related to the outbreak strain and carry the same IncY plasmid.

ANNOUNCEMENT

An outbreak of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi infections is ongoing in Pakistan (1, 2). Cases have been reported from November 2016 until the present, mostly from Sindh Province in the cities of Karachi and Hyderabad (1, 2). The outbreak strain has been genetically characterized previously, including identification of the resistance determinants and plasmids responsible for the XDR phenotype (2). Here, we report the sequencing and characterization of five XDR Salmonella Typhi isolates from patients in the province of Punjab in 2018.

Five isolates (Table 1) identified as XDR Salmonella Typhi at the National Institute of Health in Pakistan were subcultured on blood agar, stored in 40% glycerol Trypticase soy broth, and sent to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. DNA extraction was performed on cultures grown from single-colony frozen stocks on blood agar at 37°C overnight before sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform, as previously described (3). Default parameters were used for all software, unless otherwise specified. Lyve-SET v.1.1.4f (4) was used for high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (hqSNP) analysis with an external reference (GenBank accession number LT882486), using the following options: –min_coverage, 20; –min_alt_frac, 0.95; –allowedFlanking, 5 bp; and –mask-phages. SMALT v.0.7.4 (5) was used for mapping, and SNPs were called with VarScan v.2.3.7 (6). De novo assemblies generated using shovill v.1.0.4 (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill) were analyzed for resistance determinants using the ResFinder database (90% identity, 50% cutoff) and the PointFinder scheme for Salmonella spp. implemented in staramr v.0.4.0. Plasmid replicons were identified using abricate v.0.8.10 and a database adapted from PlasmidFinder (90% identity, 60% cutoff). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed at the CDC National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) laboratory, using CLSI interpretative criteria (7). Extracted DNA from one isolate (2018K-0756) from a 29-year-old male resident of Punjab was also sequenced by Pacific Biosciences single-molecule real-time (SMRT) technology. Reads were filtered using RS_Filter from SMRT Analysis v.2.3.0 (minsubreadlength, 1,000) and de novo assembled using FLYE v.2.4.2 (8, 9), followed by initial polishing using multiple rounds of Quiver v.2.3.0, and final polishing with Illumina reads using Pilon v.1.22. Annotation of the final assembled chromosome and plasmid was performed using Prokka v.1.13.3 and Galileo AMR (10) (http://galileoamr.arcbio.com/mara/). Additionally, assembly and annotation were performed through the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) upon the submission of reads to GenBank (11). Alignment of 2018K-0756 to the previously published Sindh Province outbreak strain 22420_1_10_Pak60006_2016 (GenBank accession number LT882486) was performed with Mauve in Geneious v.2019.1.1.

TABLE 1.

BioSample, GenBank, and SRA accession numbers for sequenced isolatesa

Isolate BioSample accession no. GenBank accession no. SRA accession no. No. of total reads Coverage (×) Plasmid replicon(s)
2018K-0753 SAMN13019481 AALWUW000000000 SRR10267561 759,755 36.8 IncY, ΔIncQ1
2018K-0754 SAMN13019479 AALZFY000000000 SRR10267562 1,141,854 56.1 IncY, ΔIncQ1
2018K-0755 SAMN13019474 AALZFX000000000 SRR10279247 1,015,738 49.8 IncY, ΔIncQ1
2018K-0756 SAMN12774580 CP044007 (chromosome), CP044008 (plasmid) SRR10279247 1,085,924 53.3 IncY
2018K-0757 SAMN13019471 AALWUU000000000 SRR10267564 1,106,063 53.8 IncY, ΔIncQ1
a

All five isolates display the same phenotype (ACSSuCxCipNalCot [A, ampicillin; C, chloramphenicol; S, streptomycin; Su, sulfisoxazole; Cx, ceftriaxone; Cip, ciprofloxacin; Nal, nalidixic acid; Cot, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole]) and carry the same resistance determinants, namely, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, catA1, dfrA7, qnrS1, sul1, sul2, and S83F(gyrA).

All isolates were within five pairwise hqSNPs of each other and within five SNPs of 22420_1_10_Pak60006_2016 according to Pathogen Detection (SNP cluster PDS000002867.370) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/), confirming their relatedness to the outbreak strain. All had an S83F mutation in the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA and carried nine resistance genes [aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, catA1, dfrA7, qnrS1, sul1, and sul2]. The XDR phenotype conferred by these resistance determinants was confirmed for all five isolates, namely, resistance to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All contained an IncY plasmid replicon and a partial IncQ1 replicon (529 bp of the 796-bp IncQ1 replicon sequence) within the resistance region, except 2018K-0756, which lacked IncQ1. 2018K-0756 carries catA1, dfrA7, and sul1 in a chromosomally integrated IS1-mediated composite transposon at the same location as in 22420_1_10_Pak60006_2016 but lacks a 7,857-bp internal region containing the partial IncQ1 replicon, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, blaTEM-1B, and sul2. The IncY plasmid from 2018K-0756 (p2018K-0756) carries aph(3″)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, qnrS1, and sul2 and is 99.99% identical (5 SNPs) to that from 22420_1_10_Pak60006_2016 (p60006) (GenBank accession number LT906492).

Data availability.

The sequences discussed here have been deposited in GenBank and SRA under the accession and BioSample numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The findings and conclusions of this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

We acknowledge Gohar Zaman, Summiya Nizamuddin, and Muhammad Usman for the provision of isolates.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chatham-Stephens K, Medalla F, Hughes F, Appiah GD, Aubert RD, Caidi H, Angelo KM, Walker AT, Hatley N, Masani S, Nash J, Belko J, Ryan ET, Mintz E, Friedman CR. 2019. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi infections among travelers to or from Pakistan—United States, 2016–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 68:11–13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6801a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klemm EJ, Shakoor S, Page AJ, Qamar FN, Judge K, Saeed DK, Wong VK, Dallman TJ, Nair S, Baker S, Shaheen G, Qureshi S, Yousafzai MT, Saleem MK, Hasan Z, Dougan G, Hasan R. 2018. Emergence of an extensively drug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi clone harboring a promiscuous plasmid encoding resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins. mBio 9:e00105-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00105-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lindsey RL, Batra D, Rowe L, Loparev VN, Stripling D, Garcia-Toledo L, Knipe K, Juieng P, Sheth M, Martin H, Halpin AL. 2017. High-quality genome sequence of an Escherichia coli O157 strain carrying an mcr-1 resistance gene isolated from a patient in the United States. Genome Announc 5:e01725-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01725-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Katz LS, Griswold T, Williams-Newkirk AJ, Wagner D, Petkau A, Sieffert C, Van Domselaar G, Deng X, Carleton HA. 2017. A comparative analysis of the Lyve-SET phylogenomics pipeline for genomic epidemiology of foodborne pathogens. Front Microbiol 8:375. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ponstingl H, Ning Z. 2010. SMALT—a new mapper for DNA sequencing reads. F1000Research 1:313. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. 2012. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CDC. 2018. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System for Enteric Bacteria (NARMS): human isolates surveillance report for 2015 (final report). CDC, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner P. 2019. Assembly of long error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lin Y, Yuan J, Kolmogorov M, Shen MW, Chaisson M, Pevzner P. 2016. Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E8396–E8405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604560113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Partridge SR, Tsafnat G. 2018. Automated annotation of mobile antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Annotator (MARA) and database. J Antimicrob Chemother 73:883–890. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences discussed here have been deposited in GenBank and SRA under the accession and BioSample numbers listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES