Abstract
Plant molecular pharming is a promising system to produce important recombinant proteins such as therapeutic antibodies, pharmaceuticals, enzymes, growth factors, and vaccines. The system provides an interesting alternative method to the direct extraction of proteins from inappropriate source material while offering the possibility to overcome problems related to product safety and source availability. Multiple factors including plant hosts, genes of interest, expression vector cassettes, and extraction and purification techniques play important roles in the plant molecular pharming. Plant species, as a biosynthesis platform, are a crucial factor in achieving high yields of recombinant protein in plant. The choice of recombinant gene and its expression strategy is also of great importance in ensuring a high amount of the recombinant proteins. Many studies have been conducted to improve expression, accumulation, and purification of the recombinant protein from molecular pharming systems. Re-engineered vectors and expression cassettes are also pivotal tools in enhancing gene expression at the transcription and translation level, and increasing protein accumulation, stability, retention and targeting of specific organelles. In this review, we report recent advances and strategies of plant molecular pharming while focusing on the choice of plant hosts and the role of some molecular pharming elements and approaches: promoters, codon optimization, signal sequences, and peptides used for upstream design, purification and downstream processing.
Keywords: Recombinant Protein, Hairy Root, Transgenic Tobacco, Expression Cassette, Total Soluble Protein
Introduction
A plant molecular pharming system has been thoroughly explored over the last two decades. Molecular pharming has had positive impacts on the production of pharmaceutically important proteins. It has proven that some pharmaceuticals displaying advantageous clinical properties over their native counterparts could be produced in efficient ways by molecular pharming technologies. As molecular pharming platforms, plants are excellent biofactories for the production of drugs, antibodies, and vaccines in various host systems such as whole transgenic plants, cell suspension culture, hairy roots, and hydroponic culture [1–3]. However, based on the biochemical pathway features, plant species are different in their ability to express and accumulate recombinant proteins. Various plant species have already been investigated for their relevance to produce bioactive molecules in an artificial way in plants. Table 1 summarizes some human antibodies and vaccines produced in different plant species and eukaryotic algae.
Table 1.
Recombinant protein | Class | Plant | Pathology | Clinical trial status | Reference or company website |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CaroRX™ | Antibody | Tobacco | Tooth decay | Approved as medical device | http://www.planetbiotechnology.com/ |
DoxoRX™ | Antibody | Tobacco | Side effects of cancer therapy | Phase I complete | http://www.planetbiotechnology.com/ |
RhinoRX™ | Tobacco | Rhinovirus prophylactic | Phase II | http://www.planetbiotechnology.com/ | |
Fv antibodies (38C13) | Antibody | Tobacco | Lymphoma | Phase I complete | http://www.lsbc.coma |
IgG (ICAM1) | Antibody | Tobacco | Common cold | Phase I | http://www.planetbiotechnology.com/ |
Antibody hepatitis B | Antibody | Tobacco | Hepatitis B | On market | [115] |
2 G12IgG1 | Antibody | Maize | HIV-1 | Phase I | http://www.pharma-planta.net/ |
Tobacco | |||||
Antitumor necrosis factor (Pr-anti-TNF) | Antibody | Carrot | Arthritis | Preclinical | http://www.protalix.com/ |
Anti-CD20 mAb (BLX-301) | Antibody | Duckweed | Lymphomas | Preclinical | http://www.biolex.com/ |
MAPP66 | Antibody | Tobacco | HSV/HIV microbicide | Phase I | http://www.bayer.com/ |
Avicidin® | Antibody | Maize | Colorectal cancer | Withdraw from phase II | |
IgA (HIgA-1) | Antibody | Soybean | HSV | Phase I | http://www.epicyte.com/ |
Cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) | Vaccine | Rice | Cholera | Phase I | [116, 117] |
LT-B | Vaccine | Maize | Diarrhea | Phase I | [118] |
Potato | Phase I | ||||
LT-B and TGEV glycoprotein S | Vaccine | Maize | Diarrhea and gastroenteritis | Phase I | [119] |
HBsAg | Vaccine | Lettuce | Hepatitis | Phase I | [120] |
Potato | [121] | ||||
HBsAg-env, gag epitopes of HIV-1 | Vaccine | Tomato | Hepatitis | [122] | |
Norwalk virus capsid protein (NVCP) | Vaccine | Potato | Gastroenteritis | Phase I | [123] |
Major capsid protein VP6 | Vaccine | Potato | Severe viral diarrhea | Preclinical | [124] |
HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HSV herpes simplex virus, ICAM intercellular adhesion molecule, LT-B heat labile enterotoxin B subunit, mAb monoclonal antibody, TGEV transmissible gastroenteritis virus
Thanks to important advantages over other prokaryotic or eukaryotic systems, plants have gained great importance in molecular pharming because they offer (1) reduced contamination risks, (2) reduced costs, (3) scaling-up possibilities [4–6], and (4) synthesizing of large and complex protein compounds while retaining their activities (post-translational modifications) [7]. There is, however, a major drawback to a plant molecular system regarding low expression and accumulation levels of some foreign proteins. To overcome this shortcoming, several studies have been conducted to improve the different aspects that allow increasing the yield of the recombinant proteins in plants. Some of these studies have focused on the choice of plant hosts, others on the bioengineering strategies of the target proteins and the expression cassettes with their components such as promoters, terminal sequences, epitope tags, and signal peptides. These aspects must be taken into account when we attempt to maximize the expression and yield of the targeted proteins to increase their production. Intensified efforts have also been done to improve heterologous gene structures and codon optimization. Here, we review these aspects and report recent advances in the improvements of plant molecular pharming to increase protein yield and accumulation based on upstream and downstream processing studies and empirical essays.
Choice of the Host: The Appropriate Plant Platform
The choice of suitable plants for molecular pharming technology is an essential factor for the success of the plant molecular pharming approach. The choice of host plant depends on a broad range of criteria including the nature of the protein, ability for transformation and regeneration, post-translational modifications, scale-up of production and maintenance costs, span of production cycles, and the downstream processing requirements. A wide range of plant crops have thus been tested for molecular pharming purposes, including leafy crops, cereal and legume seeds, oil crops, plant cell suspensions, hairy roots, and microalgae.
Leafy crops are helpful in terms of biomass yield and high soluble protein levels [8]. Additionally, leaf harvesting does not need flowering and thus significantly reduces contamination through pollen or seed dispersal [5]. However, there is a major problem of instability of the expressed proteins in leaves due to proteolytic degradation with aging of the leaves. In fact, the instability of proteins present in leaf cells, and also in cells of the other plant tissues, may start during the translation of the foreign proteins, which hold a natural tendency towards a structural heterogeneity in a heterologous environment [9]. Despite this, one of the major causes of protein instability inside the leaf cells is the presence of numerous proteolytic vacuoles in their cytoplasm. In fact, the mature leaves possess very large extra cytoplasmic vacuolar compartments containing numerous active proteolytic enzymes that are involved in the degradation of native and foreign proteins, notably after harvesting or during downstream processing (extraction/purification from freshly collected leaves). One main life-supporting function of the vacuolar compartment is protein breakdown. Indeed, numerous vacuoles are major sites of cellular proteolysis and contribute largely to amino acid recycling in the cell, in vivo [10]. To avoid this hurdle, the leaves must be processed immediately at the farm or transported as dried or frozen material [11]. Moreover, protein expression in plant aerial parts could affect the growth and development of the host plant. Tobacco is the most suitable leafy crop for many reasons such as high biomass yield, well-established technology for gene transfer and expression, year-round growth and harvesting, and the existence of large-scale infrastructure for processing. Furthermore, tobacco has little risk in contaminating either food or feed chains because it is a non-food or non-feed crop. Although many tobacco cultivars contain high levels of toxic alkaloids and phenolic substances [12], these compounds can be removed during the purification process. The use of transgenic tobacco chloroplasts as an alternative bioreactor presents important advantages including high transgene-copy number and high level of accumulated proteins with reduced toxicity for the host plant [13]. Many recombinant proteins have been produced at high levels in tobacco chloroplasts. For example, Oey et al. [14] obtained a proteinaceous antibiotic by transformation of the tobacco chloroplast by up to 70 % of the total soluble proteins (TSP), which is the highest recombinant protein accumulation accomplished so far in plants. More recently, a proinsulin has been expressed in tobacco and lettuce chloroplasts with reduced cost and facility for oral delivery [15].
Alternative leafy crops such as alfalfa, lettuce, and soybean are also being investigated as suitable hosts for molecular pharming [16]. Alfalfa and soybean produce lower amounts of leaf biomass than tobacco, but they have a major advantage of using atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic relations, resulting in reduced fertilizer inputs [17]. Alfalfa is particularly useful because it can be harvested up to nine times a year and has high leaf protein content (up to 30 mg total protein per gram in fresh weight). Medicago Inc. Company (http://www.medicago.com) has invested in the development of transformation methods for the production of recombinant proteins in alfalfa leaves in order to improve the yield of antibodies with human-like N-glycans [18].
Lettuce is also being investigated as a production host for edible recombinant vaccines and it has been used in a series of clinical trials for vaccine production against hepatitis B [19], pig edema disease [20], pneumonic plague [16], cholera [21], severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus [22], and porcine epidemic diarrhea viruses [23]. One disadvantage, however, of the chloroplast transgenic system is that plant plastids do not ensure some of the important post-translational modifications, such as glycosylation. The latter is required for the function of many human proteins; the only organelle that can achieve this process is the Golgi apparatus. However, there are differences between the models of human and plant glycosylation, and these differences can cause an immune response in humans [24]. Therefore, plastid-based expression technology is limited to the production of non-glycosylated products [25].
Seeds of cereals and legumes offer many advantages, in particular the long stability of their expressed proteins because seeds have an appropriate biochemical and physiologic environment such as dormancy and low water content that promote stable protein accumulation [26]. Indeed, the lost water by desiccation changes the pH ambient, consequently decreasing the activity of proteases inside seed cells and protecting the recombinant protein contents. Hence, the protein storage in seed endosperm allows long-term storage for at least 3 years at room temperature with no detectable loss of protein activity [27]. Cereal seeds also lack the phenolic substances that are present in tobacco leaves, increasing the efficiency of downstream processing [7]. The high seed protein content, ranging from 7 to 10 %, is translated into high expression for several seed-targeted recombinant proteins [28–31]. However, the overall yields of recombinant proteins in seed crops are much lower than in tobacco. Additionally, the transgenic plants must pass through a flowering cycle to produce seeds; therefore, there is a possibility of contamination that may occur by pollen transfer [5, 32].
Maize, rice, barley, and wheat are the most important platforms for seed recombinant protein production. Generally, maize seeds are excellent bioreactors because their kernel sizes are large (with 82 % of endosperm), which is the principal site of protein accumulation [33, 34]. Maize also has several advantages such as having the highest biomass yield among food crops, and ease of transformation and scaling-up [7]. The foremost disadvantage of using maize as a bioreactor is that it is a cross-pollinating plant, and thus there is substantial risk of contamination of maize crops by their transgenic counterparts [35]. Similar to maize, rice is easy to transform and to scale-up with a self-pollinating trait, reducing the probability of horizontal gene flow [36]. Recent studies report that rice has the potential to offer an oral delivery system for vaccine antigens and therapeutic proteins [31, 32]. Like rice, barley is a self-pollinating crop and could be considered a better choice than maize [7]. However, barley is less widely grown than maize and harder to transform [37, 38]. On the other hand, wheat shows the lowest yields per unit biomass and it is still under development and improving transformation efficiency [39].
Legume seeds are also an interesting production system because they have exceptionally high protein content (20–40 %), which could produce high yields of recombinant proteins too. Soybean seeds offer the advantage of a low risk of contamination by pollen because soybean is largely self-pollinating, with a low production cost. Furthermore, soybean has been explored for its efficacy in expressing human growth hormone [40] and humanized antibody against herpes simplex virus [41]. Similar to soybean, peas present comparable advantages. However, only a few studies have reported on the use of pea seeds as a platform for commercial production of recombinant proteins. Transgenic pea seeds are used as bioreactors for the production of a single-chain Fv fragment (scFV) antibody [42]. On the other hand, Saalbach et al. [43] have reported a high level of expression of scFV antibody with 2 % of the total seed protein.
Because of their inherently low associated proteolytic activity and simplified protein isolation via oil body separations, oleosin-fusion is an emerging approach as a promising system for recombinant protein production. The target recombinant protein is produced as a fusion with oleosin, accumulates in seed oil bodies, and can be purified using simple extraction and centrifugation procedures followed by the release of the target protein by proteolytic cleavage [26, 44]. However, oleosin expression levels are still not high enough for economical production. Safflower seeds are also considered advantageous for their high protein yield, low acreage, and self-pollination [32].
Plant cell suspension culture has been recognized as a promising alternative biosynthetic platform for valuable proteins, and combines the qualities of whole-plant systems with those of microbial fermentation and mammalian cell culture [45, 46]. Suspension cells in particular increase safety compared with mammalian cell systems which can harbor human pathogens. Additionally, it is well-suited for product isolation when it is secreted into the culture medium. The first plant-produced commercial therapeutic protein for human infusion, glucocerebrosidase, was produced in carrot cells [47], though other recombinant proteins have previously been produced in plants for therapeutic purposes [48, 49].
Insertion into the plant nuclear genome of the T-DNA segment, carried on a voluminous and extrachromosomal Ri-plasmid (Ri for root-inducing) present in the phytopathogen Gram-negative soil bacterium, Agrobacterium rhizogenes [50, 51], leads to the emergence of neoplastic adventitious roots, referred to as “hairy root syndrome” [52, 53]. The tumorous roots, resulting from an A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation, can be grown indefinitely in vitro and have become a viable alternative production platform for heterologous proteins, as well as for other plant metabolites naturally biosynthesized in wild roots [2]. Similar to suspension cells, hairy roots can be axenically cultured in controlled and contained environments for the production of high-value pharmaceutical proteins. In addition, the possible extracellular secretion or rhizosecretion of expressed proteins from hairy root cultures [54] offers a simplified method for the recovery of foreign proteins from a low-cost process. The advantages of rapidly growing hairy roots over suspension cells include long-term genotype and phenotype stability, efficient productivity, and good growth on hormone-free media [50]. The Swiss biotechnology company Rootec (http://www.rootec.com) is currently focusing on the commercialization of plant-derived products with hairy roots grown in mist bioreactors. Hairy roots appear to be an attractive in vitro expression system with several advantages compared with field-grown plants and suspension cultured cells.
Other systems, such as eukaryotic algae and higher aquatic plants (e.g., duckweeds) have been envisaged for heterologous protein expression. The main advantages of these platform types are fast growth, easy harvest, and high protein contents (up to 45 % dry weight) [55]. Moreover, these eukaryotic systems are able to produce glycosylated proteins contrary to the microbial cultures and their production costs are lower than that of the mammalian cells [56]. Biolex, Inc. (http://www.biolex.com) is working to develop a duckweed-based expression system to produce recombinant pharmaceuticals and proteins. The leading product of Biolex, a hepatitis C treatment, is a controlled-release interferon (IFN)-α2b that is currently on the market [57]. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), i.e., anti-CD20 mAb and anti-CD30 mAb, represent another range of products that are actually in preclinical development [58]. Microalgae also offer potential production systems of recombinant proteins because of their ease of genetic transformation, rapid growth, short life cycles, and cost effectiveness [59]. Currently, most of the work is achieved with one green unicellular alga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [11]. C. reinhardtii taken as a recombinant protein expression system combines, at once, the traditional bacterial fermentation or mammalian cell-culture methods. These microalgae offer post-translational modification systems that are not present in bacteria and essential for the biological activity of many therapeutic proteins [60]. Furthermore, C. reinhardtii has a rapid growth rate with a doubling time of 10 h under optimal growth conditions and supports easy nuclear and chloroplast genome transformation. Therefore, only the chloroplast is considered a realistic production system for a high level of recombinant protein accumulation [61, 62]. However, as mentioned earlier, the principal limitation of chloroplast recombinant protein production is that the expressed proteins lack post-translational modifications such as glycosylation [11]. Despite this limitation, functional recombinant proteins, including antibodies and growth factors [63], vaccines [64], and autoantigens [13] have been expressed in the chloroplast of C. reinhardtii. Plant molecular pharming technology has attracted more attention in the corporate world and more international companies are specializing in this field. Table 2 provides the names and web addresses of biotech companies working on molecular pharming to develop relevant plant platforms.
Table 2.
Structure and Function of the Expression Cassette in Molecular Pharming Systems
The high costs of the production of drugs in transgenic plants can be minimized by increasing the expression levels of the target molecules. To improve protein expression levels, it is necessary to understand the functional gene structure and all genetic and epigenetic parts in spatio-temporal expression context. The prerequisite for making the system effective in molecular pharming is to improve the expression level based on the expression cassette structures to enhance the transcription and translation of recombinant proteins. To optimize the transcription of recombinant proteins, some approaches have been envisaged with a focus on promoter elements, translation and stability of the transcripts, leader sequences and exogenous or endogenous signal peptides. Tandem repeats of recombinant proteins or peptides and RNA interference (RNAi) technology to suppress the proteinase activity have also been attempted in order to increase the yield of proteins of interest.
Promoters in Molecular Pharming
Gene promoter is an essential element in genetic engineering for plant molecular pharming. Promoter can have ubiquitous expression (35S promoter) or spatiotemporal expression features as deacetylvindoline 4-O-acetyl transferase gene promoter from the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus [65]. For its strength and efficiency to express recombinant genes in living cells, the 35S promoter is widely used for driving the expression of various recombinant genes in the molecular pharming industry [5, 66–68]. The human growth factor placental lactogen (hPL) is an example transcribed by 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco cells [69]. The 35S promoter is used as single or multiple copies to increase gene transcription efficiency. It is used, for example, as a part of the vector pRJC-hTf to express the human serum transferrin (hTf) in transgenic tobacco [70], and in Arabidopsis protoplasts and maize callus to study the localization of the Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit (LT-B) [34]. Dual 35S promoter is used as a part of the pZP200 vector to increase the expression levels of the surface antigen 1 (SAG1) [from 78 to 322] open reading frame (ORF) antigen of Toxoplasma gondii in tobacco leaves [71].
Although 35S promoter is a good choice for molecular pharming systems, it has moderate expression levels in some seed crops expressing recombinant proteins due to the lack of cis-acting regulatory elements specific for promoters of mature seeds’ genes and the elements on which specific transcription factors bind to activate or repress the transcription. Moreover, 35S promoter is not as efficient in monocots as in dicots. For this reason, monocot seed-adapted promoters have to be used instead of 35S promoter. As such, the fatty acid elongase (FAD) was employed as a seed-specific promoter to express a chimeric protein in canola seeds [72]. The maize 27 kDa γ-zein promoter with γ-zein signal peptide was also used as a part of recombinant gene cassettes to drive the gene expression of the cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) in maize seeds [34, 73]. Another example of seed-specific promoters is the barley horde in promoter (0.45 kb), which is employed to express and produce an active recombinant human hematopoietic growth factor FlT in pb22gl-12 in barley plants [74]. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that extending the length of the globulin1 promoter from 1.4 to 3 kb or using three tandem repeats of the 1.4 kb globulin1 promoter was a successful strategy to increase the expression level of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in maize seeds. The obtained yield of this antigen shifted from 0.12 to 0.31 % of the TSP [75]. On the other hand, inducible promoters are a powerful approach to restricting the gene expression at the spatiotemporal level and expressing the recombinant genes when and where they are needed. For example, the rice gene promoter α-amy8, which is strongly inducible by sugar depletion, was successfully employed to produce the mouse granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (mGM-CSF) in rice suspension culture with a final yield up to 8 % of total secreted proteins [76]
The microalgae C. reinhardtii has also employed for production of recombinant proteins based either on a nuclear or a chloroplast gene expression systems. For nuclear one, a few promoters have been used such as the promoters of the photosystem I complex, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase, heat shock protein 70A genes while for chloroplast gene expression systems, other genes promoter were exploited as the rbcL (ribulose bisphosphate), atpA (alpha subunit of adenosine triphos-phatase), psbD (photosystem II D1) and psbA (photosys-tem II psbA) promoters are considered a good choice. These promoters have been found to be more efficient when they are used with their 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (5′UTR and 3′UTR) [77].
Chloroplast-based systems have the advantage of avoiding the nuclear gene silencing and methylation with enhanced increasing of the level of transgene expression. Tobacco chloroplast is envisioned as a relevant host to produce native and synthetic insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 (IGF-1s), while employing its specific regulatory elements including 5′UTR and 3′UTR regions and 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) promoter as part of the expression cassette. The chloroplast recombinant protein is fully functional based on its ability to stimulate the growth and proliferation of the human HU-3 cells [78]. Another example of using chloroplast as a model to produce human recombinant protein is the production of the IFN-α5 gene in tobacco chloroplasts [79]. In this study, the chloroplast rbcl light-inducible promoter was able to produce a yield up to 4,063 pg/g fresh weight [79].
Table 3 summarizes some promoters and other elements in the expression cassettes used in molecular pharming systems.
Table 3.
Plant host | Vector | Promoter and other parts in the expression cassette | Recombinant product/yield | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tobacco leaves, tissue (transgenic/stable expression) | pL32, a | CaMV 35S promoter, murine heavy chain leader, HDEL | IgG antibodies (yield is variable from 0.1 to 1.4 of TSP based on extraction techniques) | [83] |
Arabidopsis, tobacco, and petunia seeds (transgenic) | pPphas.G4 | Specific seeds β-phaseolin cassette promoter (pPphas), Ω leader, 5′UTR of tobacco mosaic virus; attR1, attR2, attL1, attL2, Gateway recombination site | GAD (65 kDa), murine anti-inflammatory cytokine-IL-10 and proinsulin/yield in Arabidopsis: GAD: 7.7 % of TSP, IL-10: 0.70 % of TSP, proinsulin: 0.007 % of TSP | [19, 81] |
Barley seeds (transgenic) | Pb22g1-12 | Hordein promoter (0.42 kb) | Human hematopoietic growth factor Fit3 ligand/12 mg of protein per kg of seeds | [74] |
Algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast (transgenic) | p322 | Chloroplast rbcL promoter, 5′UTR of hGAD65 and 3′UTR of rbcL and 5.7 kb inverted repeat region of C. reinhardtii chloroplast DNA | hGAD65, accumulation to 0.25–2.3 % of TSP | [13] |
Rice cell suspension (transgenic) | Gateway pAAmy3-mGM-CSF | Promoter of the α-amy3 amylase gene, signal peptide sequence | mGM-CSF/24.6 mg/L | [76] |
Soybean seeds (transgenic) | pbcong3 | α′ subunit of β-conglycinin seed-specific promoter and an α-Coixin signal peptide from Coix lacryma jobi fused to the hFIX gene | 56 kDa hFIX/0.23 % of TSP (0.8 g in 1 kg seed) | [125] |
Carrot leaves and taproots (transgenic) | pCBV16 vector | 35S and root-specific Mll promoter, targeting signal of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia calreticulin apoplast | Human interferon-α2b/up to 50.7 × 103 IU/g FW; accumulated in carrot plants for young leaves for taproot-expressing system/up to 16.5 × 103 IU/g FW | [126] |
Tobacco leaves (transient) | pBIN19 tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) | 35S promoter (CaMV-P) (CaMV-T), terminator CaMV-P, 5′ and 3′ non-translated regions of Cowpea mosaic virus RNA-2, P19 gene-silencing suppressor. Actin2 or Hsp81.1 promoters. RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; movement protein; NLS signal | HPV-8 L1 and its truncated L1△C22 (lack of 22 C-terminal amino acids)/fourfold (60 and 240 mg/kg infiltrated leaves) | [107] |
Transgenic tobacco leaves (transgenic) | Binary Gateway pK7WG2 | 35S promoter; pA35S: CaMV 35S 3′ terminator; for mutated form, maize α-zein SP in 5′; KDEL, endoplasmic reticulum retention signal | 65-kDa isoform of GAD (GAD65, GAD65mut, and GAD67/65mut). Inactive mutated form was produce with 10-fold higher yield than the active form (2.2 % of TSP) | [100] |
Rice suspension culture (transgenic) | pCAMBIA3300 | Double 35S promoter, (amylase RNAi: self-complementary ‘hairpin’ RNA (ihpRNA) of Ramy3D [sense sequence (tigger1), first intron of Ramy3D, linker and anti-sense sequence (trigger2)]. 3′UTR | Reduction to 22 % of amylase accumulation and increase of hGM-CSF to 1.9-fold | [104] |
5′UTR 5′-untranslated region, CaMV cauliflower mosaic virus, FW fresh weight, GAD glutamic acid decarboxylase, HDEL His-Asp-Glu-Leu, hGAD65 human glutamic acid decarboxylase 65, hFIX human coagulation factor IX, hGM-CSF human granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor, HPV-8 human papillomavirus-8, IL-10 interleukin-10, KDEL Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu, mGM-CSF mouse granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor, NLS nuclear localization signal, RNAi RNA interference, SP storage protein, TSP total soluble protein
Specific Peptides and Sequences to Enhance Molecular Yield Pharming Productivity
In addition to the importance of promoter architecture for gene expression in molecular pharming, other strategies based on using specific peptides at N- and C-termini have been employed to enhance the transcript level of recombinant proteins. These peptides are recognizable by the host system and can increase the level of transcription and translation of recombinant proteins with enhanced stability and protection against protease degradation by targeting recombinant protein in the secretory pathway to specific organelles [34]. The cereal α-amylase signal peptide is largely used in seed-specific vectors, e.g., to produce the mouse mGM-CSF in a Gateway vector under the control of the α-amylase gene promoter [76]. Replacing the native signal with α-amylase signal peptide did not show significant effect on the expression and accumulation of the protein in transgenic tobacco and potato [80]. The signal peptide from the 2S2 seed storage protein was successfully used to direct the human recombinant proteins into a seed secretory pathway in Arabidopsis, petunia, and tobacco [26, 81]. Another signal peptide, the AP24 Osmotin, is used to target the surface-expressed antigen 1 (SAG1) and granule dense 4 (GRA4) to the apoplast of tobacco leaves [71]. The bacterial LT-B from E. coli can drive the localization of recombinant proteins to the secretory pathway in Arabidopsis protoplasts and maize [34]. The sequence KDEL (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu), encoding for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal, was used to express the mouse (mGM-CSF) into tobacco transgenic plants [82]. Kozak consensus peptide plays an important role in eukaryotic gene expression system [72]. Kozak and KDEL (vacuole retention peptides) are largely exploited to enhance the expression, stability, and retention of recombinant protein [26]. Ma and co-workers [80] showed that pleiotropic cytokine interleukin (IL)-4 expression level under the control of 35S promoter in transgenic tobacco and potato was increased when using constructs containing the ER SEKDEL (Ser-Glu-Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) in C-terminal. HDEL (His-Asp-Glu-Leu) retention peptide was also shown to be crucial for ER targeting of the IgG–HDEL fusion into transgenic tobacco plants [83]. The histidine tag (his-tag) is widely used for targeting and facilitating the purification of recombinant proteins [80, 84]. The ZZ linker from Staphylococcus aureus is also used as an epitope tag in chloroplast expression cassette to facilitate the purification process of synthetic and native IGF-1 [78].
Other specific signals and peptides are used for their suitability to host plants and their positive roles in transcription and/or translation of the recombinant proteins. Table 4 summarizes some of these specific signals and their usage as parts of the expression cassettes.
Table 4.
Peptide/Purpose | Vector | Expressed gene | Plant host system/yield | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Signal peptides | ||||
AP24 osmotin signal peptide/driving the mature protein to apoplast | pZP200 | SAG1 (surface antigen1) from Toxoplasma gondii | Tobacco leaves/1.3 μg per g FW | [71] |
Bacterial signal peptide | pCTB-BSG | The non-toxic B subunit (CT-B) of cholera, toxin from Vibrio cholera | Maize seeds/the highest expression level in T1 generation seeds was 0.0014 % of TSP | [73] |
Endogenous signal peptide (SPArtv1)/direct Art v 1 to the secretory pathway | pBI121 | Allergen of Artemisia vulgaris pollen, Art v 1 | Tobacco plant and cells cultures/low level (as ≥1 μg/L cell culture) | [127] |
Prolamin signal peptide/target hGH to ER | pGH-Pi | hGH | Rice seeds/470 μg/g dry weight | [109] |
Phaseolin signal peptide (sp) and phaseolin vacuolar sorting-signal AFVY | pBI121 | Plasmodium Falciparum merozoite surface protein (42-kDa) Malaria vaccine antigen | A. thaliana seeds/5 % of total extractable protein | [128] |
Peptide tag | ||||
Elastin-like polypeptides/stability and purification | pCB301 | HIV-neutralizing antibodies 2G12 (light or heavy chain) | Tobacco transgenic plants/1 % TSP in leaves and seeds | [8, 129] |
BASB/cell wall, vacuole targeting | Codon-optimized heat-stable HBsAg gene | Maize seeds/0.31 % TSP (BASB) and 0.12 % TSP | [75] | |
Hydrophobin HFBI gene from Trichoderma reesei/change hydrophobicity of partner | pCaMterX | GFP–HFBI fusion accumulate and backed into protein bodies | Transiently agro-infiltrated Tobacco/51 % of TSP, 91 % recovery of GFP–HFBI fusion protein (10 mg/mL) | [130, 131] |
SBA/full ORF as a tag for purification | PBI101 | GFP fused to ORF of SBA | Tobacco leaves/2.5 % of TSP and 90 % purification efficiency using N-acetyl-d-galactosamine-agar columns | [84] |
Tamavidin 2/fungal avidin-like protein that binds biotin with high affinity, a versatile affinity tag | pSP24 | SBA–tamavidin (SBA-S-TM2) fusion | Tobacco By-2 cells 2 mg/L highly purified (90–95 % purity) on the microbeads | [132] |
Thrombin protease/cleavage site | PTZ57 | Human interferon-α5 | Tobacco chloroplasts/4,372 pg/g FW | [79] |
BASB barley amylase signal peptide, CT-B cholera toxin B subunit, ER endoplasmic reticulum, FW fresh weight, GFP green fluorescence protein, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HFBI hydrophobin, hGH human growth hormone, ORF open reading frame, SBA soybean agglutinin, TSP total soluble protein
Codon Optimization and Chimeric Gene Strategies in Molecular Pharming
Re-engineering recombinant genes could generate active proteins with increased expression levels. The possibility of making a fusion between a few genes using linkers to assemble amino acids or ORFs in a chimeric structure is a successful strategy in molecular pharming. Using the optimal codon to match the endogen proprieties of the host plant can significantly increase the level of transcription and translation of recombinant proteins. Amani et al. [72], for example, employed linkers to create a chimeric structure of three virulence factors: EspA, Intimin, and Tir receptor from E. coli O157:H7. The designed vaccine was able to reduce bacterial infection and colonization in mice. Another example was constructed from two heavy- and light-chain sequences of LO-BM2 antibody (a therapeutic IgG) and expressed in tobacco bright yellow (BY)-2 cells [85]. The two chains were fused in tandem or inverted in a convergent orientation to be expressed as part of an expression cassette under the control of PMA4 promoter with two 35S enhancer sequences. In this work, the tandem construct had a much higher level of expression than the inverted one in tobacco suspension cells and transgenic tobacco plants [85]. A number of chimeric proteins have been constructed from multiple HIV proteins to be evaluated as HIV vaccines. Targets for HIV vaccines included the different categories of HIV proteins: structural proteins (ex. gag, env, glycoprotein [gp] 120, gp41, gp160); enzymes (pol); and regulatory proteins (nef, tat, rev, vpr). More information about potential vaccines reported as candidate plant-based vaccines for human is reviewed by Soria-Guerra et al. [6].
Protein accumulation could also be increased by duplicating a small peptide to form a large multimeric protein. For example, ten sequential tandem repeats of the small peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) were combined into one large synthetic gene that was introduced to tobacco [86]. Western blot analysis revealed that the multimerized GLP-1 protein accumulated up to 0.15 % of the TSP in transgenic tobacco leaves. Additionally, Cerovska et al. [87] constructed a chimeric version of an epitope driven from the human papillomavirus type 16 L2 (amino acids from 108 to 120), fused to the coat protein of the potato virus X (PVX CP). Then, the chimeric construction was transiently expressed in transgenic tobacco with a resulting yield of the fused protein of 170 mg/kg of the fresh leaf tissue.
Codon optimization of the surface antigen, SAG178–322 from Toxoplasma gondii (protozoan parasite), was investigated in transgenic tobacco leaves [71]. The synthetic ORF of SAG1 was designed by overlapping oligonucleotides strategy with codon optimized by ER signal peptide. The synthetic SAG1 was then introduced into the plant binary vector, pZP200, and expressed in tobacco leaves. It was found that the tobacco leaves transformed with unmodified SAG1 gene accumulated protein five- to tenfold more than the leaves transformed with a codon-optimized SAG1 gene [71]. This may be due to the ER localization signal that allowed high accumulation levels of the native SAG1. While this study shows a negative impact of the codon optimization on the expression of synthetic, optimized gene, Daniell et al. [78] found that IGF-1s was expressed, and fully functional, in tobacco chloroplasts at similar levels of the native IGF protein. In fact, in a comparison study between the expression levels of the native IGF-1 and an IGF-1s, the authors found that, after optimization of the IGF-1 gene, the yield of the optimized IGF-1 was 11.3 % of TSP, while the native IGF-1 was 9.5 % of TSP. Moreover, the expression of the IGF-1s was detected by western blots in E. coli, while no native IGF-1 protein was observed, suggesting that the translation machinery in chloroplast is more flexible than in E. coli, with regard to codon optimization and usage [71].
Linkers in Molecular Pharming for Recombinant Protein Fusions
In plant molecular pharming, linkers are important elements for producing multimeric proteins, and introducing multiple and more complex traits. Linkers are short peptide sequences composed of flexible residues such as glycine and serine between adjacent domains to ensure that these domains do not sterically interfere with each other. Linkers are important elements assembling few proteins, ORFs, or peptides together without interfering with the structure of fused units. Linkers have no negative effects on the activity and stability of the assembled parts in the new structure. Variable short peptides have been exploited as linkers in genetic engineering. For example, the linker EAAAK was used to design a new synthetic gene encoding the carboxy-terminal fragment of Intimin, the middle region of Tir receptor and the carboxy-terminal part of the EspA factor in E. coli [72, 88]. The new synthetic gene was translated into transgenic canola and tobacco plants with a yield up to 0.2–0.33 % TSP in transgenic canola seeds and 0.1–0.3 % TSP in transgenic tobacco. Another example is the AG simple alanine-glycine linker (AG linker), consisting of six amino acids with three AG repeats (AGAGAG). This linker was used as a part of the expression cassette in pLM03, pLM08, and pLM09 vectors and resulted in a positive shift of yield from undetectable to 0.059 % extracted from maize kernels [34]. As a part of a cleavable polyprotein precursor with native kex2p-like protease activity, the kex2p linker (IGKRGK) 3EF (amino acids Leu/Glu and Glu/Phe) was also successfully used to fuse red fluorescent protein (DsRed) or human cytokine (GMCSF) to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) into the viral vector TTOSA1-103SPEKCD43 and the two fusions were expressed in tobacco cells (referred to as RKG and GKG cells). The expression levels of RKG and GKG were 0.5 and 0.2 % of TSP, respectively [89]. To test the effect of the length of linker on the accumulation of recombinant proteins, two different lengths were compared by Plchova et al. [90]. The first link was four amino acids in length (GPGP) and the second 15 amino acids in length (SGGGG) × 3. Both of them were employed to link different mutagenized versions of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein with PVX CP in C- and N-terminal [90]. The resulting fusions were then expressed in E. coli and tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana), but no significant difference was observed between the two lengths of linker on the accumulating protein constructs. However, the N-terminus fusions resulted in twofold higher protein yield than the C-terminus fusion (approximately 2.80 mg/mL culture medium against 1.35 mg/mL, respectively). More information about linkers and the choice of linkers are provided by Soria-Guerra [6] and Crasto and Feng [91].
Gateway Vectors in Plant Molecular Pharming
The Gateway recombination system is a relatively recent powerful tool used in molecular cloning and gene expression investigations. Based on specific recombination sequences, the Gateway system allows cloning and transferring of DNA fragments in a high-throughput manner between different expression vectors while maintaining the orientation of the cloned reading frame [92]. The system is based on the insertion of a DNA fragment, or a complete ORF, between two flanking recombination sequences in a specific plasmid vector to create an “entry clone”. Once an entry clone is created, the cloned DNA could be sub-cloned to any Gateway-designed expression vector, independent of the vector function or the host background [92]. Due to its advantage as a high-throughput cloning tool, Gateway technology is suitable for creating ‘molecular archives’ containing the whole predicted ORFs, ORFeome, of an organism [93]. Different ORFeome projects have thus been generated using Gateway technology for protein expression and functional analysis, such as the yeast ORFeome [94] and the human ORFeomes [95]. The Gateway ORFeomes also allow straightforward expression of native or N-terminal and/or C-terminal fusion proteins [96]. The use of Gateway technology in molecular pharming is emerging at great pace. A recent study support this trend and reports the suitability of Gateway-based vectors to transform plant chloroplast [97]. The author of this study converted a standard transformation vector into a Gateway destination vector in which they cloned the GFP associated with a ribosome binding site, T7g10. Then, they transformed the tobacco chloroplast by the biolistic method, and found that GFP was successfully integrated into the plastid genome and resulted in an accumulation level of GFP protein up to 3 % of the TSP. PCR testing and confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed the presence of GFP in the chloroplast, suggesting that Gateway system is suitable for plant pharming in this organelle. In another recent study, Buntru et al. [98] report that multigene constructs carrying seven transgenes, up to 26 kb size, were successfully transformed into tobacco cells using Gateway technology and were stably inherited for at least two generations. One of the implications of the findings in this study is the availability of a powerful and efficient tool for multigenes transformation that may facilitate the genetic engineering for the production of pharmaceutical compounds at an industrial scale.
Kagale et al. [99] have also constructed a series of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) compatible with Gateway technology and intended for ORFeome exploitation with the facility of N- or C-terminal fusions with a wide range of epitope tags. Similarly, Liu et al. [76] have recently constructed a Gateway-compatible binary T-DNA destination vector to produce the mGM-CSF in rice suspension cell culture under the control of the rice α-amy8 promoter with its signal peptide. A binary Gateway vector, pK7WG2, has been successfully used to produce the human glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65), an autoantigen implicated in type 1 diabetes mellitus, in transgenic tobacco with protein accumulation up to 2.2 % of TSP, but retaining its autoantigenecity [100]. Morandini et al. [101] also investigated the use of Gateway vectors such as the pPhasGW for seed-specific transgene expression system. The pPhasGW vector was successfully employed to express a few human recombinant proteins such as a chimeric version of GAD67/65, an isoform of the glutamic acid decarboxylase (65 kDa), a murine anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and proinsulin. These proteins were produced in Arabidopsis and tobacco under the control of the specific seeds promoter phaseolin and resulted in a high yield of the chimeric GAD67/65 in Arabidopsis seeds (7.7 % of TSP) while IL-10 and proinsulin reached up to 0.70 and 0.007 % of TSP, respectively [101]. The pPhasGW vector was also a good choice to express a few other constructs harboring recombinant single-chain variable fragments to the crystallizing fragment of the antibody (scFv-Fc) of two antiviral mAbs (2G12 and HA78) in Arabidopsis transgenic seeds and leaves under the control of the seed-specific β-phaseolin promoter from Phaseolus vulgaris; the maximal expression levels ranged from 0.8 to 9.4 mg recombinant protein per gram dry seed weight [81].
More information about Gateway-compatible plants can be found elsewhere [102, 103].
RNA Interference, Gene Silencing and Suppressing of the Proteases Activity in Molecular Pharming
The limitations to producing a high yield of recombinant proteins are sometimes related to the plant host system and its metabolism. This obstacle can be overcome by inhibiting some of the major metabolic activities in the plant host. For example, the production and accumulation of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was significantly increased in transgenic rice suspension culture by an RNAi approach designed to suppress the cysteine proteinase gene expression or by the inhibition of proteinase [104, 105]. The inactivation of ATP/ADP transporters in potato tubers by RNAi methodology increased the accumulation level of human recombinant mAb, scFv L1G6, in the tubers up to twofold, with 30 % increase in tuber biomass and 50 % more soluble protein than wild-type tubers [106]. In rice, it was found that the co-transformation of cell suspension culture with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) and a serine proteinase inhibitor II gene resulted in a reduction of the protease activity and an increase of the yield of the recombinant rhGM-CSF by twofold compared with cells expressing rhGM-CSF only [105]. The strategy of a gene silencing suppressor was applied on a few systems to enhance the gene expression and recombinant protein accumulation. For example, adding a suppressor of gene silencing can have a positive role on gene expression such as the derivatives of pEAQ-HT vector, which was used to express transiently the human papillomavirus under the control of 35S promoter in agro-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves [107]. The anthrax receptor fusion protein co-expressed with viral gene silencing suppressors in agro-infiltrated tobacco leaves showed a tenfold increase in the recombinant protein compared with the absence of suppression, particularly with p1 suppressor [108]. Rice seeds are an efficient model to produce pharmaceuticals for human health, particularly when storage proteins (13 kDa prolamin and glutelin) have been silenced by the RNAi technology, so the yield of the human growth hormone polypeptides reached the level of 470 μg/g dry weight [109].
Protease activities, in turn, can be exploited to increase the level of recombinant proteins. The protease activities were investigated to express multiple secretory proteins in fusions between red fluorescent protein (DsRed), or human cytokine (GMCSF), and downstream GFP as a single transgene by using a cleavable polyprotein precursors containing kex2p linkers such as LEAGG(IGKRGK)3EF [89]. Using protease inhibitors in a specific manner demonstrated its potential to increase the recombinant protein yield. The transient expression of tomato Cathepsin D, inhibitors of A1 and S1 proteinases, led to improvement of the murine diagnostic antibody C5-1 accumulation and protection. It altered the A1/S1 protease activities in the targeted specific cell compartment (leaf apoplast) in N. benthamiana and increased the protein content by 40 % [110].
Glycosylation Patterns in Plants Producing Pharmaceutical Proteins
Glycosylation represents the most important post-translational modification that corresponds to covalent linkage of an oligosaccharide side chain to the natural or biopharmaceutical proteins [111]. Shared by all eukaryotic organisms, this fundamental mechanism significantly modulates folding, activity, yield, and immunogenicity of therapeutic glycoproteins [112]. Nevertheless, there are interkingdom differences in the glycosylation patterns, particularly in the N-glycoform design. N-glycosylation starts in the ER and continues in the Golgi apparatus with the addition of α(1,3)-fucose and β(1,2)-xylose residues to N-glycans in plants and with the addition of α(1,6)-fucose moieties, glucose, and acid sialic residues to N-glycans of glycoproteins in mammals [17]. Plant-specific xyloglucan is likely associated with allergenicity disorders limiting the use of therapeutic glycosylated proteins by parenteral administration. To overcome such hurdles, humanization of plant-made glycoproteins must be achieved. In recent years, promising strategies of glycoengineering have made humanizing plant N-glycolysation possible [113], either by inactivation of the host plant’s endogenous glycosyltransferases (α1,3-fucosyltransferases and β1,2-xylosyltransferase) or de novo expression of heterologous glycosyltransferases (β (1,4) galactosyltransferase and sialyltransferase), similar to those of mammals [114]. Besides, proteins resident of the ER lumen possess high-Man (Mannose)-type N-glycans with structures common to plants and mammals [114]. Thereby, the addition of the H/KDEL sequence at the C-terminal end of a secreted protein makes its retention in the ER possible and its glycosylation is limited to only high mannose-type N-glycans [111]. Another non-immunogenic glycosylation approach, based on RNA-interference, modulates the levels of xylosyl and fucosyl glycans and prevents the addition of undesirable sugar residues to biotherapeutic proteins [17].
Conclusion and Perspectives
Many genetic, upstream and downstream aspects of the molecular pharming technology must be taken into account when we attempt to maximize the expression and translation of the recombinant proteins of interest. Various plants species, organs, tissues, cells, and subcellular organelles have been extensively studied to optimize the yield of pharmaceutical recombinant proteins with more or less successful results. Genetic transformation and regeneration systems are still not feasible or are unavailable for other plant species. This fact narrows the spectra of plant hosts available to explore new approaches and tools to enhance the potential of drug design, discovery, and production.
The design of expression cassette in molecular pharming has profound effects on gene expression and protein accumulation. It is thus of high interest to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the transcription and translation process of the recombinant proteins. In this review, we attempted to bring into focus the involvement of some transcription and translation constituents. Although a limited number of studies report the applications of Gateway vectors in molecular pharming studies, these vectors facilitate the cloning and the expression in a short time in comparison with classical cloning techniques. Epigenetic RNAi or gene silencing suppressors can also have significant impacts on the whole plant metabolism and the expression and accumulation of heterologous proteins. The obstacle of plant glycosylation features can be overcome by humanization of plant-made glycoproteins.
The plant-made pharmaceuticals industry will flourish in the near future when it is able to provide a high quality and quantity of pharmaceutical products at low costs and with basic infrastructure. It is currently in dire need of a standard regulation system to avoid all environmental and healthcare system troubles (biosafety and regulatory issues). The recent advancements and progress in molecular biology and genomic studies and molecular cloning techniques will certainly give more effective expression and purification systems for the plant molecular pharming platform.
Acknowledgments
Abdullah Makhzoum thanks Prof. Mark Bernards for his helpful to publish the manuscript. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
References
- 1.Ma JK, Barros E, Bock R, Christou P, Dale PJ, Dix PJ, et al. Molecular farming for new drugs and vaccines. Current perspectives on the production of pharmaceuticals in transgenic plants. EMBO Rep. 2005;6(7):593–599. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guillon S, Tremouillaux-Guiller J, Pati PK, Rideau M, Gantet P. Hairy root research: recent scenario and exciting prospects—commentary. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9:341–346. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Drake PM, Barbi T, Sexton A, McGowan E, Stadlmann J, Navarre C, et al. Development of rhizosecretion as a production system for recombinant proteins from hydroponic cultivated tobacco. FASEB J. 2009;23(10):3581–3589. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-131771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Raskin I, Ribnicky DM, Komarnytsky S, Ilic N, Poulev A, Borisjuk N, et al. Plants and human health in the twenty-first century. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20(12):522–531. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)02080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Twyman RM, Stoger E, Schillberg S, Christou P, Fischer R. Molecular farming in plants: host systems and expression technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(12):570–578. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soria-Guerra RE, Moreno-Fierros L, Rosales-Mendoza S. Two decades of plant-based candidate vaccines: a review of the chimeric protein approaches. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(8):1367–1382. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1065-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramessar K, Capell T, Christou P. Molecular pharming in cereal crops. Phytochem Rev. 2008;7:579–592. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Richman A, Menassa R. Protein body-inducing fusions for high-level production and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(4):419–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00596.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Streatfield SJ. Approaches to achieve high-level heterologous protein production in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5(1):2–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Muntz K. Protein dynamics and proteolysis in plant vacuoles. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(10):2391–2407. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ma S, Jevnikar AM, Hüner NPA. Microalgae as bioreactors for production of pharmaceutical proteins comprehensive biotechnology. In: Moo-Young M, editor in chief. Comprehensive biotechnology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2011. p. 301–7.
- 12.Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Jevnikar AM, Menassa R, Brandle JE. Optimization of elastin-like polypeptide fusions for expression and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103(3):562–573. doi: 10.1002/bit.22278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang X, Brandsma M, Tremblay R, Maxwell D, Jevnikar AM, Huner N, et al. A novel expression platform for the production of diabetes-associated autoantigen human glutamic acid decarboxylase (hGAD65) BMC Biotechnol. 2008;8:87. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-8-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oey M, Lohse M, Kreikemeyer B, Bock R. Exhaustion of the chloroplast protein synthesis capacity by massive expression of a highly stable protein antibiotic. Plant J. 2009;57(3):436–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boyhan D, Daniell H. Low-cost production of proinsulin in tobacco and lettuce chloroplasts for injectable or oral delivery of functional insulin and C-peptide. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(5):585–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00582.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rosales-Mendoza S, Soria-Guerra RE, Moreno-Fierros L, Alpuche-Solís ÁG, Martínez-González L, Korban SS. Expression of an immunogenic F1-V fusion protein in lettuce as a plant-based vaccine against plague. Planta. 2010;232(2):409–416. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1176-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Obembe OO, Popoola JO, Leelavathi S, Reddy SV. Advances in plant molecular farming. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(2):210–222. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vezina LP, Faye L, Lerouge P, D’Aoust MA, Marquet-Blouin E, Burel C, et al. Transient co-expression for fast and high-yield production of antibodies with human-like N-glycans in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009;7(5):442–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marcondes J, Hansen E. Transgenic lettuce seedlings carrying hepatitis B virus antigen HBsAg. Br J Infect Dis. 2008;12(6):469–471. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702008000600004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsui T, Takita E, Sato T, Aizawa M, Ki M, Kadoyama Y, et al. Production of double repeated B subunit of Shiga toxin 2e at high levels in transgenic lettuce plants as vaccine material for porcine edema disease. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(4):735–748. doi: 10.1007/s11248-010-9455-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim Y-S, Kim B-G, Kim T-G, Kang T-J, Yang M-S. Expression of a cholera toxin B subunit in transgenic lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture. 2006;87(2):203–210. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li HY, Ramalingam S, Chye ML. Accumulation of recombinant SARS-CoV spike protein in plant cytosol and chloroplasts indicate potential for development of plant-derived oral vaccines. Exp Biol Med. 2006;231(8):1346–1352. doi: 10.1177/153537020623100808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huy NX, Yang MS, Kim TG. Expression of a cholera toxin B subunit-neutralizing epitope of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus fusion gene in transgenic lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Mol Biotechnol. 2011;48(3):201–209. doi: 10.1007/s12033-010-9359-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gomord V, Chamberlain P, Jefferis R, Faye L. Biopharmaceutical production in plants: problems, solutions and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23(11):559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Clarke JL, Daniell H, Nugent JM. Chloroplast biotechnology, genomics and evolution: current status, challenges and future directions. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(3–5):207–209. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9792-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boothe J, Nykiforuk C, Shen Y, Zaplachinski S, Szarka S, Kuhlman P, et al. Seed-based expression systems for plant molecular farming. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(5):588–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rademacher T, Arcalis E, Stoger E. Production and localization of recombinant pharmaceuticals in transgenic seeds. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;483:69–87. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-407-0_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hood E, Witcher D, Maddock S, Meyer T, Baszczynski C, Bailey M, et al. Commercial production of avidin from transgenic maize: characterization of transformant, production, processing, extraction and purification. Mol Breed. 1997;3(4):291–306. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Horvath H, Huang J, Wong O, Kohl E, Okita T, Kannangara CG, et al. The production of recombinant proteins in transgenic barley grains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(4):1914–1919. doi: 10.1073/pnas.030527497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Woodard SL, Mayor JM, Bailey MR, Barker DK, Love RT, Lane JR, et al. Maize (Zea mays)-derived bovine trypsin: characterization of the first large-scale, commercial protein product from transgenic plants. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2003;38(Pt 2):123–130. doi: 10.1042/BA20030026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang L, Wakasa Y, Takaiwa F. Biopharming to increase bioactive peptides in rice seed. J AOAC Int. 2008;91(4):957–964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lau OS, Sun SMS. Plant seeds as bioreactors for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:1015–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ramessar K, Sabalza M, Capell T, Christou P. Maize plants: an ideal production platform for effective and safe molecular pharming. Plant Sci. 2008;174(4):409–419. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moeller L, Gan Q, Wang K. A bacterial signal peptide is functional in plants and directs proteins to the secretory pathway. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(12):3337–3352. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spök A. Molecular farming on the rise-GMO regulators still walking a tightrope. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takaiwa F, Takagi H, Hirose S, Wakasa Y. Endosperm tissue is good production platform for artificial recombinant proteins in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5(1):84–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dahleen LS, Manoharan M. Recent advances in barley transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 2007;43:493–506. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sreenivasulu N, Graner A, Wobus U. Barley genomics: an overview. Int J Plant Genomics. 2008;2008:486258. doi: 10.1155/2008/486258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Harwood WA. Advances and remaining challenges in the transformation of barley and wheat. J Exp Bot. 2011;63(5):1791–1798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Russell DA, Spatola LA, Dian T, Paradkar VM, Dufield DR, Carroll JA, et al. Host limits to accurate human growth hormone production in multiple plant systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89(7):775–782. doi: 10.1002/bit.20366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zeitlin L, Pauly M, Whaley KJ. Second-generation HIV microbicides: continued development of griffithsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(15):6029–6030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902239106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Perrin Y, Vaquero C, Gerrard I, Sack M, Drossard J, Stöger E, et al. Transgenic pea seeds as bioreactors for the production of a single-chain Fv fragment (scFV) antibody used in cancer diagnosis and therapy. Mol Breed. 2000;6:345–352. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saalbach I, Giersberg M, Conrad U. High-level expression of a single-chain Fv fragment (scFv) antibody in transgenic pea seeds. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158:529–533. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang AH. Oleosins and oil bodies in seeds and other organs. Plant Physiol. 1996;110(4):1055–1061. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.4.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huang T, McDonald KA. Bioreactor engineering for recombinant protein production in plant cell suspension cultures. Biochem Eng J. 2009;45(3):168–184. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Xu J, Kieliszewski MJ. A novel plant cell bioproduction platform for high-yield secretion of recombinant proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;824:483–500. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-433-9_26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shaaltiel Y, Bartfeld D, Hashmueli S, Baum G, Brill-Almon E, Galili G, et al. Production of glucocerebrosidase with terminal mannose glycans for enzyme replacement therapy of Gaucher’s disease using a plant cell system. Plant Biotechnol J. 2007;5(5):579–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cramer CL, Boothe JG, Oishi KK. Transgenic plants for therapeutic proteins: linking upstream and downstream strategies. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol. 1999;240:95–118. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60234-4_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Radin DN, Cramer CL, Oishi KK, Weissenborn DL. Production of human lysosomal proteins in plant-based expression systems. United States Patent No, 5929304; European Patent No. 0865499; 1999.
- 50.Giri A, Narasu ML. Transgenic hairy roots: recent trends and applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2000;18:1–22. doi: 10.1016/s0734-9750(99)00016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.White FF, Nester EW. Hairy root: plasmid encodes virulence traits in Agrobacterium rhizogenes. J Bacteriol. 1980;141(3):1134–1141. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.3.1134-1141.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Willmitzer L, Sanchez-Serrano J, Buschfeld E, Schell J. DNA from Agrobacterium rhizogenes in transferred to and expressed in axenic hairy root plant tissues. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;186(1):16–22. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chilton M-D, Tepfer DA, Petit A, David C, Casse-Delbart F, Tempe J. Agrobacterium rhizogenes inserts T-DNA into the genomes of the host plant root cells. Nature. 1982;295(5848):432–434. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gaume A, Komarnytsky S, Borisjuk N, Raskin I. Rhizosecretion of recombinant proteins from plant hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2003;21(12):1188–1193. doi: 10.1007/s00299-003-0660-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stomp A. The duckweeds: a valuable plant for biomanufacturing. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2005;11:69–99. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11002-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rival S, Wisniewski JP, Langlais A, Kaplan H, Freyssinet G, Vancanneyt G. Spirodela (duckweed) as an alternative production system for pharmaceuticals: a case study, aprotinin. Transgenic Res. 2008;17:503–513. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9123-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.De Leede LG, Humphries JE, Bechet AC, Van Hoogdalem EJ, Verrijk R, Spencer DG. Novel controlled-release Lemna-derived IFN-alpha2b (Locteron): pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in a phase I clinical trial. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2008;28(2):113–122. doi: 10.1089/jir.2007.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cox KM, Sterling JD, Regan JT, Gasdaska JR, Frantz KK, Peele CG, et al. Glycan optimization of a human monoclonal antibody in the aquatic plant Lemna minor. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(12):1591–1597. doi: 10.1038/nbt1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rasala BA, Mayfield SP. The microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a platform for the production of human protein therapeutics. Bioeng Bugs. 2011;2(1):50–54. doi: 10.4161/bbug.2.1.13423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Specht E, Miyake-Stoner S, Mayfield S. Micro-algae come of age as platform for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32(10):1373–1383. doi: 10.1007/s10529-010-0326-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Franklin SE, Mayfield SP. Recent developments in the production of human therapeutic proteins in eukaryotic algae. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2005;5(2):225–235. doi: 10.1517/14712598.5.2.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xu J, Dolan MC, Medrano G, Cramer CL, Weathers PJ. Green factory: plants as bioproduction platforms for recombinant proteins. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;30(5):1171–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rasala BA, Muto M, Lee PA, Jager M, Cardoso RM, Behnke CA, et al. Production of therapeutic proteins in algae, analysis of expression of seven human proteins in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(6):719–733. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00503.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Siripornadulsil S, Dabrowski K, Sayre R. Microalgal vaccines. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;616:122–128. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75532-8_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Makhzoum A, Petit-Paly G, St Pierre B, Bernards MA. Functional analysis of the DAT gene promoter using transient Catharanthus roseus and stable Nicotiana tabacum transformation systems. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(7):1173–1182. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1025-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua N. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature. 1985;313(6005):810–812. doi: 10.1038/313810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lawton MA, Tierney MA, Nakamura I, Anderson E, Komeda Y, Dubé P, et al. Expression of a soybean β-conclycinin gene under the control of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S and 19S promoters in transformed petunia tissues. Plant Mol Biol. 1987;9(4):315–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00014906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Fischer R, Emans N. Molecular farming of pharmaceutical proteins. Transgenic Res. 2000;9(4–5):279–299. doi: 10.1023/a:1008975123362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Urreta I, Oyanguren I, Castañón S. Tobacco as biofactory for biologically active hPL production: a human hormone with potential applications in type-1 diabetes. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(4):721–733. doi: 10.1007/s11248-010-9452-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brandsma ME, Diao H, Wang X, Kohalmi SE, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. Plant-derived recombinant human serum transferrin demonstrates multiple functions. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(4):489–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00499.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Laguia-Becher M, Martin V, Kraemer M, Corigliano M, Yacono M, Goldman A, et al. Effect of codon optimization and subcellular targeting on Toxoplasma gondii antigen SAG1 expression in tobacco leaves to use in subcutaneous and oral immunization in mice. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-10-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Amani J, Mousavi SL, Rafati S, Salmanian AH. Immunogenicity of a plant-derived edible chimeric EspA, Intimin and Tir of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in mice. Plant Sci. 2011;180(4):620–627. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Karaman S, Cunnick J, Wang K. Expression of the cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) in maize seeds and a combined mucosal treatment against cholera and traveler’s diarrhea. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;31(3):527–537. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1146-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Erlendsson LS, Muench MO, Hellman U, Hrafnkelsdóttir SM, Jonsson A, Balmer Y, et al. Barley as a green factory for the production of functional Flt3 ligand. Biotechnol J. 2010;5(2):163–171. doi: 10.1002/biot.200900111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hayden CA, Egelkrout EM, Moscoso AM, Enrique C, Keener TK, Jimenez-Flores R, et al. Production of highly concentrated, heat-stable hepatitis B surface antigen in maize. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10(8):979–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00727.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu YK, Huang LF, Ho SL, Liao CY, Liu HY, Lai YH, et al. Production of mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor by gateway technology and transgenic rice cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(5):1239–1247. doi: 10.1002/bit.24394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rosales-Mendoza S, Paz-Maldonado LM, Soria-Guerra RE. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a viable platform for the production of recombinant proteins: current status and perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31(3):479–494. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1186-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Daniell H, Ruiz G, Denes B, Sandberg L, Langridge W. Optimization of codon composition and regulatory elements for expression of human insulin like growth factor-1 in transgenic chloroplasts and evaluation of structural identity and function. BMC Biotechnol. 2009;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-9-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Khan MS, Nurjis F. Synthesis and expression of recombinant interferon alpha-5 gene in tobacco chloroplasts, a non-edible plant. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;39(4):4391–4400. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-1227-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ma S, Huang Y, Davis A, Yin Z, Mi Q, Menassa R, et al. Production of biologically active human interleukin-4 in transgenic tobacco and potato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2005;3(3):309–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Loos A, Van Droogenbroeck B, Hillmer S, Grass J, Pabst M, Castilho A, et al. Expression of antibody fragments with a controlled N-glycosylation pattern and induction of endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles in seeds of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;155(4):2036–2048. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.171330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gora-Sochacka A, Redkiewicz P, Napiorkowska B, Gaganidze D, Brodzik R, Sirko A. Recombinant mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is glycosylated in transgenic tobacco and maintains its biological activity. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2010;30(3):135–142. doi: 10.1089/jir.2009.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hassan S, van Dolleweerd CJ, Ioakeimidis F, Keshavarz-Moore E, Ma JK. Considerations for extraction of monoclonal antibodies targeted to different subcellular compartments in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6(7):733–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tremblay R, Diao H, Huner N, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. The development, characterization, and demonstration of a novel strategy for purification of recombinant proteins expressed in plants. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(6):1357–1366. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9498-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.De Muynck B, Navarre C, Nizet Y, Stadlmann J, Boutry M. Different subcellular localization and glycosylation for a functional antibody expressed in Nicotiana tabacum plants and suspension cells. Transgenic Res. 2009;18(3):467–482. doi: 10.1007/s11248-008-9240-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Brandsma M, Wang X, Diao H, Kohalmi SE, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. A proficient approach to the production of therapeutic glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in transgenic plants. Open Biotechnol J. 2009;3:57–66. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cerovska N, Hoffmeisterova H, Moravec T, Plchova H, Folwarczna J, Synkova H, et al. Transient expression of Human papillomavirus type 16 L2 epitope fused to N- and C-terminus of coat protein of Potato virus X in plants. J Biosci. 2012;37(1):125–133. doi: 10.1007/s12038-011-9177-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Amani J, Mousavi SL, Rafati S, Salmanian AH. In silico analysis of chimeric espA, eae and tir fragments of Escherichia coli O157:H7 for oral immunogenic applications. Theor Biol Med Model. 2009;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-6-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhang B, Rapolu M, Huang L, Su WW. Coordinate expression of multiple proteins in plant cells by exploiting endogenous kex2p-like protease activity. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(9):970–981. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Plchova H, Moravec T, Hoffmeisterova H, Folwarczna J, Cerovska N. Expression of human papillomavirus 16 E7ggg oncoprotein on N- and C-terminus of potato virus X coat protein in bacterial and plant cells. Protein Expr Purif. 2011;77(2):146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2011.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Crasto CJ, Feng JA. LINKER: a program to generate linker sequences for fusion proteins. Protein Eng. 2000;13(5):309–312. doi: 10.1093/protein/13.5.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA. DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 2000;10(11):1788–1795. doi: 10.1101/gr.143000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Walhout AJ, Temple GF, Brasch MA, Hartley JL, Lorson MA, van den Heuvel S, et al. GATEWAY recombinational cloning: application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes. Methods Enzymol. 2000;328:575–592. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)28419-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Matsuyama A, Arai R, Yashiroda Y, Shirai A, Kamata A, Sekido S, et al. ORFeome cloning and global analysis of protein localization in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(7):841–847. doi: 10.1038/nbt1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wiemann S, Arlt D, Huber W, Wellenreuther R, Schleeger S, Mehrle A, et al. From ORFeome to biology: a functional genomics pipeline. Genome Res. 2004;14(10B):2136–2144. doi: 10.1101/gr.2576704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Itoh M, Yasunishi A, Imamura K, Kanamori-Katayama M, Suzuki H, Suzuki M, et al. Constructing ORFeome resources with removable termination codons. Biotechniques. 2006;41(1):44. doi: 10.2144/000112209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Gottschamel J, Waheed MT, Clarke JL, Lossl AG. A novel chloroplast transformation vector compatible with the Gateway recombination cloning technology. Transgenic Res. Epub 2013 Jun 29. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 98.Buntru M, Gartner S, Staib L, Kreuzaler F, Schlaich N. Delivery of multiple transgenes to plant cells by an improved version of MultiRound Gateway technology. Transgenic Res. 2013;22(1):153–167. doi: 10.1007/s11248-012-9640-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kagale S, Uzuhashi S, Wigness M, Bender T, Yang W, Borhan MH, et al. TMV-Gate vectors: gateway compatible tobacco mosaic virus based expression vectors for functional analysis of proteins. Sci Rep. 2012;2:874. doi: 10.1038/srep00874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Avesani L, Vitale A, Pedrazzini E, DeVirgilio M, Pompa A, Barbante A, et al. Recombinant human GAD65 accumulates to high levels in transgenic tobacco plants when expressed as an enzymatically inactive mutant. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(8):862–872. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Morandini F, Avesani L, Bortesi L, Van Droogenbroeck B, De Wilde K, Arcalis E, et al. Non-food/feed seeds as biofactories for the high-yield production of recombinant pharmaceuticals. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9(8):911–921. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Earley KW, Haag JR, Pontes O, Opper K, Juehne T, Song K, et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 2006;45(4):616–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Invitrogen. Gateway Technology: A universal technology to clone DNA sequences for functional analysis and expression in multiple systems; 2010. http://tools.invitrogen.com/content/sfs/manuals/gatewayman.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2013
- 104.Kim N-S, Kim T-G, Kim O-H, Ko E-M, Jang Y-S, Jung E-S, et al. Improvement of recombinant hGM-CSF production by suppression of cysteine proteinase gene expression using RNA interference in a transgenic rice culture. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;68(3):263–275. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9367-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kim TG, Lee HJ, Jang YS, Shin YJ, Kwon TH, Yang MS. Co-expression of proteinase inhibitor enhances recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor production in transgenic rice cell suspension culture. Protein Expr Purif. 2008;61(2):117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tremblay R, Diao H, Hüner N, Jevnikar AM, Ma S. The development of a high-yield recombinant protein bioreactor through RNAi induced knockdown of ATP/ADP transporter in Solanum tuberosum. J Biotechnol. 2011;156(1):59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Matić S, Masenga V, Poli A, Rinaldi R, Milne RG, Vecchiati M, et al. Comparative analysis of recombinant human papillomavirus 8 L1 production in plants by a variety of expression systems and purification methods. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10(4):410–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Arzola L, Chen J, Rattanaporn K, Maclean JM, McDonald KA. Transient co-expression of post-transcriptional gene silencing suppressors for increased in planta expression of a recombinant anthrax receptor fusion protein. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(8):4975–4990. doi: 10.3390/ijms12084975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Shigemitsu T, Ozaki S, Saito Y, Kuroda M, Morita S, Satoh S, et al. Production of human growth hormone in transgenic rice seeds: co-introduction of RNA interference cassette for suppressing the gene expression of endogenous storage proteins. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;31(3):539–549. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1191-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Goulet C, Khalf M, Sainsbury F, D’Aoust MA, Michaud D. A protease activity-depleted environment for heterologous proteins migrating towards the leaf cell apoplast. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10(1):83–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Saint-Jore-Dupas C, Faye L, Gomord V. From planta to pharma with glycosylation in the toolbox. Trends Biotechnol. 2007;25(7):317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lienard D, Sourrouille C, Gomord V, Faye L. Pharming and transgenic plants. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2007;13:115–147. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(07)13006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Sourrouille C, Marquet-Blouin E, D’Aoust MA, Kiefer-Meyer MC, Seveno M, Pagny-Salehabadi S, et al. Down-regulated expression of plant-specific glycoepitopes in alfalfa. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6(7):702–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Gomord V, Fitchette AC, Menu-Bouaouiche L, Saint-Jore-Dupas C, Plasson C, Michaud D, et al. Plant-specific glycosylation patterns in the context of therapeutic protein production. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(5):564–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kaiser J. Is the drought over for pharming? Science. 2008;320(5875):473–475. doi: 10.1126/science.320.5875.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Nochi T, Takagi H, Yuki Y, Yang L, Masumura T, Mejima M, et al. Rice-based mucosal vaccine as a global strategy for cold-chain- and needle-free vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(26):10986–10991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703766104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Pinkhasov J, Alvarez ML, Pathangey LB, Tinder TL, Mason HS, Walmsley AM, et al. Analysis of a cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) and human mucin 1 (MUC1) conjugate protein in a MUC1-tolerant mouse model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59(12):1801–1811. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0906-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Tacket CO. Plant-derived vaccines against diarrheal diseases. Vaccine. 2005;23(15):1866–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Basaran P, Rodriguez-Cerezo E. Plant molecular farming: opportunities and challenges. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2008;28(3):153–172. doi: 10.1080/07388550802046624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Streatfield SJ. Regulatory issues for plant-made pharmaceuticals and vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005;4(4):591–601. doi: 10.1586/14760584.4.4.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Hefferon K. Clinical trials fuel the promise of plant-derived vaccines. Am J Clin Med. 2010;7:30–37. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Shchelkunov SN, Salyaev RK, Pozdnyakov SG, Rekoslavskaya NI, Nesterov AE, Ryzhova TS, et al. Immunogenicity of a novel, bivalent, plant-based oral vaccine against hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency viruses. Biotechnology Lett. 2006;28(13):959–967. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Tacket CO, Mason HS, Losonsky G, Estes MK, Levine MM, Arntzen CJ. Human immune responses to a novel Norwalk virus vaccine delivered in transgenic potatoes. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(1):302–305. doi: 10.1086/315653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yu J, Langridge W. Expression of rotavirus capsid protein VP6 in transgenic potato and its oral immunogenicity in mice. Transgenic Res. 2003;12(2):163–169. doi: 10.1023/a:1022912130286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Cunha NB, Murad AM, Ramos GL, Maranhao AQ, Brigido MM, Araujo AC, et al. Accumulation of functional recombinant human coagulation factor IX in transgenic soybean seeds. Transgenic Res. 2011;20(4):841–855. doi: 10.1007/s11248-010-9461-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Luchakivskaya Y, Kishchenko O, Gerasymenko I, Olevinskaya Z, Simonenko Y, Spivak M, et al. High-level expression of human interferon alpha-2b in transgenic carrot (Daucus carota L.) plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(3):407–415. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0942-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Siegert M, Pertl-Obermeyer H, Gadermaier G, Ferreira F, Obermeyer G. Expression of the major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1 in tobacco plants and cell cultures: problems and perspectives for allergen production in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;31(3):561–571. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1199-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lau OS, Ng DW, Chan WW, Chang SP, Sun SS. Production of the 42-kDa fragment of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 1, a leading malaria vaccine antigen, in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8(9):994–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Floss DM, Sack M, Arcalis E, Stadlmann J, Quendler H, Rademacher T, et al. Influence of elastin-like peptide fusions on the quantity and quality of a tobacco-derived human immunodeficiency virus-neutralizing antibody. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009;7(9):899–913. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Joensuu JJ, Conley AJ, Lienemann M, Brandle JE, Linder MB, Menassa R. Hydrophobin fusions for high-level transient protein expression and purification in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(2):622–633. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Joensuu JJ, Conley AJ, Linder MB, Menassa R. Bioseparation of recombinant proteins from plant extract with hydrophobin fusion technology. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;824:527–534. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-433-9_28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Takakura Y, Oka N, Kajiwara H, Tsunashima M, Usami S, Tsukamoto H, et al. Tamavidin, a versatile affinity tag for protein purification and immobilization. J Biotechnol. 2010;145(4):317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]