Skip to main content
Life Science Alliance logoLink to Life Science Alliance
. 2020 Mar 25;3(4):e201900593. doi: 10.26508/lsa.201900593

Mylk3 null C57BL/6N mice develop cardiomyopathy, whereas Nnt null C57BL/6J mice do not

Jack L Williams 1, Anju Paudyal 2, Sherine Awad 1, James Nicholson 1, Dominika Grzesik 1, Joaquin Botta 1, Eirini Meimaridou 3, Avinaash V Maharaj 1, Michelle Stewart 2, Andrew Tinker 4, Roger D Cox 5, Lou A Metherell 1,
PMCID: PMC7103425  PMID: 32213617

Genetic differences between C57BL/6 substrains lead to different cardiovascular traits; a null mutation in Mylk3 likely causes cardiomyopathy in C57BL/6N mice, whereas C57BL/6J Nnt-null mice do not develop cardiomyopathy.

Abstract

The C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice have well-documented phenotypic and genotypic differences, including the infamous nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) null mutation in the C57BL/6J substrain, which has been linked to cardiovascular traits in mice and cardiomyopathy in humans. To assess whether Nnt loss alone causes a cardiovascular phenotype, we investigated the C57BL/6N, C57BL/6J mice and a C57BL/6J-BAC transgenic rescuing NNT expression, at 3, 12, and 18 mo. We identified a modest dilated cardiomyopathy in the C57BL/6N mice, absent in the two B6J substrains. Immunofluorescent staining of cardiomyocytes revealed eccentric hypertrophy in these mice, with defects in sarcomere organisation. RNAseq analysis identified differential expression of a number of cardiac remodelling genes commonly associated with cardiac disease segregating with the phenotype. Variant calling from RNAseq data identified a myosin light chain kinase 3 (Mylk3) mutation in C57BL/6N mice, which abolishes MYLK3 protein expression. These results indicate the C57BL/6J Nnt-null mice do not develop cardiomyopathy; however, we identified a null mutation in Mylk3 as a credible cause of the cardiomyopathy phenotype in the C57BL/6N.

Introduction

Differences in background genetics can produce many different baseline phenotypes in the ever-growing library of laboratory mouse strains, and these can have profound influences on the expression of particular trait(s) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). In the last decade, a body of research has begun to enumerate these differences, including differences in metabolism, disease susceptibility, cardiovascular function, behaviour, and many more (6, 7, 8, 9). Particularly well studied are the C57BL/6 substrains; the C57BL/6J (B6J), previously the most widely used substrain, and the C57BL/6N (B6N), which the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) has chosen as the background for their 20,000 gene knockouts (https://www.mousephenotype.org/). Many genetic differences are known to exist between these two closely related substrains with perhaps the most commonly studied the nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) mutations in the B6J.

In 2012, NNT was identified as the causative gene in 15 families with familial glucocorticoid deficiency, a disorder of adrenal insufficiency without heart involvement (10, 11). Subsequently, a further 19 families have been reported, with a single, highly consanguineous patient developing hypertrophic CM with a homozygous NNT mutation and three monoallelic variants have been linked to left ventricular non-compaction (10). A number of publications have linked NNT expression levels to cardiovascular traits, including remodelling differences, hypertension, and heart growth in mice and zebra fish (12, 13, 14, 15, 16). Surprisingly, research from the Maack Lab showed the NNT-null B6J mouse is protected from oxidative stress and heart failure in comparison with the B6N mouse, possibly because of a “reverse activity” of NNT in the B6N mouse (14). Furthermore, the NNT-replete B6N mice show increased fibrosis in response to chronic angiotensin II treatment, along with increased expression of cardiac remodelling genes; however, the authors demonstrate these changes are not due to NNT status (15). B6N mice are more susceptible to transaortic constriction than B6J with B6N having lower survival rates and cardiac function (17). The paucity of epidemiological evidence combined with the conflicting data in mouse models means NNT’s contribution to cardiac phenotypes is uncertain.

In this study, we aimed to define the role of NNT in CM using the B6J NNT-null mice and a rescue model in the B6J mice, restoring NNT expression by expression of a bacterial artificial chromosome with the full-length Nnt gene (C57BL/6J-BAC, NNT transgenic [B6J-Nnt]) (18). We also compared both of these strains with the closely related, NNT-replete, B6N mouse to assess whether NNT or another strain-specific gene(s) causes differential phenotypes between substrains, as has been previously reported (13, 14, 15, 17).

Here, we show that the B6J do not develop CM, even when aged to 18 mo, suggesting NNT loss alone does not cause CM. However, surprisingly over time, the B6N develop CM that is absent in both the B6J and B6J-Nnt. We go on to show that the CM in B6N may be due to a null mutation in myosin light chain kinase 3 (Mylk3), which is only present in B6N substrains. MYLK3 phosphorylates myosin light chain 2 (MYL2), which is itself essential for the assembly of actin fibres in the heart and mutated in many human cases of CM (19, 20).

Results

B6N mice develop CM, whereas B6J do not

To ascertain whether the B6J substrain developed CM, male mice from the three substrains B6N, B6J, and B6J-Nnt were analysed at 3, 12, and 18 mo of age, assessing cardiac form and function by echocardiography 1 wk before sacrifice (Fig 1 [12 mo], Fig S1 [collated], Fig S2 [3 mo], Fig S3 [18 mo], and Table S1 [collated]). This revealed a clear strain-dependent difference in dynamic heart structure, with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in the B6N, particularly striking at 12 mo (Fig 1A and Table S1B). B6N mice had larger left ventricular internal diameter at both diastole and systole (Fig 1B and C) and correspondingly larger left ventricular volume (Fig 1D and E) than the B6J and B6J-Nnt. However, B6N mice had thinner left ventricular anterior wall and posterior wall thicknesses, indicating a thinning or stretching of the muscle walls (Fig 1F–I). This resulted in a lowered ejection fraction and reduced fractional shortening (Fig 1K and L). There was also a reduction in cardiac output, stroke volume, and heart rate in the B6N (Fig 1J, M, and N). We observed no difference in heart weight at this age (Fig 1O). These parameters represent a remarkable difference in the cardiac phenotype of these two closely related substrains consistent with a modest DCM in the B6N rather than the B6J mice.

Figure 1. B6N mice exhibit dilated CM.

Figure 1.

(A) Representative echocardiogram traces from three 12-mo-old mice at each genotype. (B) LVID;d, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of diastole. (C) LVID;s, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of systole. (D) Left ventricular volume at the end of diastole. (E) Left ventricular volume at the end of systole. (F) LVAW;d, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (G) LVAW;s, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (H) LVPW;d, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (I) LVPW;s, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (J) Cardiac output = stroke volume × heart rate. (K) Ejection fraction = stroke volume/end diastolic volume. (L) Fractional shortening = (LVID;d − LVID;s)/LVID;d. (M) Stroke volume = volume at the end of diastole − volume at the end of systole. (N) Heart rate. (O) Heart weights of 12-mo-old mice at cull. Kruskal–Wallis, B6N n = 10, B6J n = 8, B6J-Nnt n = 11, mean ± SD, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001.

Figure S1. Collated echocardiography results from 3-, 12- and 18-mo-old mice.

Figure S1.

Collated echocardiography data across all age-groups. (A) LVID;d, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of diastole. (B) LVID;s, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of systole. (C) Left ventricular volume at the end of diastole. (D) Left ventricular volume at the end of systole. (E) LVAW;d, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (F) LVAW;s, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (G) LVPW;d, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end of diastole. (H) LVPW;s, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (I) Cardiac output = stroke volume × heart rate. (J) Ejection fraction = stroke volume/end diastolic volume. (K) Fractional shortening = (LVID;d − LVID;s)/LVID;d. (L) Stroke volume = volume at end of diastole − volume at end of systole. (M) Heart rate. (N) Heart weights of 3-, 12- and 18-mo-old mice. Significance scoring is displayed in Fig S1 for 12-mo-old mice, Fig S2 for 3-mo-old mice, and Fig S3 for 18-mo-old mice.

Figure S2. 3-mo-old B6N mice have dilated ventricles and larger ventricular volumes than both B6J substrains.

Figure S2.

(A) Representative echocardiogram traces from three 3-mo-old mice at each genotype. (B) LVID;d, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of diastole. (C) LVID;s, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of systole. (D) Left ventricular volume at the end of diastole. (E) Left ventricular volume at the end of systole. (F) LVAW;d, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (G) LVAW;s, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (H) LVPW;d, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (I) LVPW;s, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (J) Cardiac output = stroke volume × heart rate. (K) Ejection fraction = stroke volume/end diastolic volume (L) Fractional shortening = (LVID;d − LVID;s)/LVID;d. (M) Stroke volume = volume at end of diastole − volume at end of systole. (N) Heart rate. (O) Heart weights of 3-mo-old mice at cull. Kruskal–Wallis, n = 10, mean ± SD, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001.

Figure S3. 18-mo-old B6N mice have structurally and functionally different echocardiography profiles compared with both B6J substrains.

Figure S3.

(A) Representative echocardiogram traces from three 18-mo-old mice at each genotype. (B) LVID;d, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of diastole. (C) LVID;s, left ventricular internal diameter at the end of systole. (D) Left ventricular volume at the end of diastole. (E) Left ventricular volume at the end of systole. (F) LVAW;d, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (G) LVAW;s, left ventricular anterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (H) LVPW;d, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of diastole. (I) LVPW;s, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at the end of systole. (J) Cardiac output = stroke volume × heart rate. (K) Ejection fraction = stroke volume/end diastolic volume. (L) Fractional shortening = (LVID;d − LVID;s)/LVID;d. (M) Stroke volume = volume at end of diastole − volume at end of systole. (N) Heart rate. (O) Heart weights of 18-mo-old mice at cull. Kruskal–Wallis, B6N n = 11, B6J n = 8, B6J-Nnt n = 10, mean ± SD, * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001.

At 3 mo, some aspects of the divergent phenotype were present, as the B6N hearts have higher left ventricular internal diameter and left ventricular volume at both systole and diastole, as well as thinner left ventricular posterior wall at systole than both B6J and B6J-Nnt mice (Table S1A and Fig S2B–N). At 18 mo, the phenotype maintains, as the B6N hearts had thinner anterior and posterior walls as well as enlarged ventricles (Table S1C and Fig S3B–N). The dilated B6N hearts were hypofunctional, reflected in the reduced ejection fraction and fractional shortening (Fig S3K and L). At 18 mo, there was far more intragroup variability (Table S1C), which may explain the slightly higher significance values at this age compared with 12 mo (Fig S1A–M).

Dilation of the ventricles and thinning of the walls in the B6N may indicate a difference in the heart size, commonly measured by heart weight. Although all three groups exhibited a progressive increase in heart weight as they got older (Figs 1O, S1N, S2O, and S3O), there was no significant difference amongst groups at any time point. Body size, assessed by tibia length, was no different between B6N and B6J substrains, indicating no change in the heart weight:tibia length ratio in the B6Ns (data not shown). We saw no difference in survival across the groups, indicating the phenotype is nonlethal under normal conditions.

Cardiomyocytes are “stretched” in B6N hearts

Changes in cardiac function can be driven by gross structural changes such as those we see here, and this can be reflected in, and even driven by, changes in microscopic structure. Haematoxylin and eosin staining did not reveal any difference in heart size, as measured by the base–apex length (Fig 2A and B). We also observed no increased fibrosis in B6N hearts at 18 mo, barring one individual in the B6N group (Fig 2C and D). Interestingly, this individual was an outlier within this group in many echocardiographic parameters, having lower left ventricular volume and thicker muscle walls (Fig S3B).

Figure 2. Differences in microstructure of the heart amongst the three strains.

Figure 2.

(A) Representative images of 18-mo heart tissues stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar = 4,000 μm. (B) Base–apex measurements from H&E–stained sections. No significant difference in heart length. (C) Representative images of 18-mo heart tissues stained with Masson’s Trichrome. Scale bar = 200 μm. (D) Quantitation of fibrosis from Masson’s Trichrome–stained sections. n = 5 mouse hearts per group. Five sections per individual, three areas per section. Kruskal–Wallis test for grouped data, mean ± SD. (E, F) Immunofluorescent staining for wheat germ agglutinin (red) and DAPI (blue) in longitudinal (E) and transverse (F) sections of cardiomyocytes in heart tissues. Scale bar = 50 μm. (E, F, G, H) Quantitation of cardiomyocyte length (G) and cross-sectional area (H) from WGA staining in (E, F). Kruskal–-Wallis test for grouped data, n = 5, mean ± SD. (I) Immunofluorescence staining for WGA (red), MYL2 (green), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. (J) Immunofluorescence staining for WGA (red), alpha-actinin (ACTN1) (green), and DAPI (blue). (I, J, K, L) Quantification of sarcomere length and thickness from images in (I) and (J) using MyofibrilJ. n = 5 mouse hearts per group. Five sections per individual, three areas per section. Kruskal–Wallis test for grouped data, mean ± SD. (M) Western blot for ACTN1, TNNT2, MYL2, GAPDH, and NNT in 18-mo heart lysates, n = 3 mice per group. * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001.

Volume overload, similar to that observed in the B6N group, can stretch the ventricles and the heart responds by recruiting sarcomeres in series with existing sarcomeres, elongating the cardiomyocytes. This response, known as eccentric hypertrophy, is common in endurance athletes, but can also present in instances of cardiac dysfunction, and typically increases contractile force according to the Frank–Starling mechanism (21). We used wheat germ agglutinin to delineate cell membranes and allow us to measure cardiomyocyte length and cross-sectional area (CSA) in longitudinal and transverse sections, respectively (22) (Fig 2E and F). We observed an increase in cardiomyocyte length in B6N hearts, coupled with a striking reduction in CSA, suggesting the cardiomyocytes are “stretched” in these mice (Fig 2G and H). We hypothesised this might be due to changes in sarcomere organisation, typical of eccentric hypertrophy. We used MYL2 as a marker of the A band and alpha-actinin (ACTN1) as a marker of the Z-line in serial sections of heart tissue to measure sarcomere length (the distance between repeating units) and sarcomere thickness (across the short axis of the cell) (Fig 2I and J). B6N sarcomeres are thinner; however, there was no difference in sarcomere length (Fig 2K and L). Furthermore, there was no difference in the total expression of a panel of actomyosin and sarcomere markers when measured by Western blot and densitometry (MYL2, ACTN1, and TNNT2) (Fig 2M).

These data indicate both the form and function of the hearts in B6N mice are compromised. This may result from mutation of a key cardiac gene or may be acquired as a consequence of other disease states, such as hypertension, diabetes, or infection. However, we found no differences in blood biochemistry consistent with a hypertensive phenotype (Fig S4). There were no differences in plasma ions (Fig S4A); however, there were significantly higher total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein levels at 18 mo in blood from the B6N group but not at other time points (Fig S4B). Furthermore, other studies have shown the B6N mice in fact have lower blood pressure than the B6J, all but eliminating hypertension as the cause of the phenotype (23).

Figure S4. Collated plasma biochemistry.

Figure S4.

Profile of biochemical markers from plasma at 3-, 12-, and 18 mo. (A) Concentration of measured plasma ions. (B) Concentration of measured plasma carbohydrates, lipids, and lipoproteins. Kruskal–Wallis at each time point; n = 8 minimum, n = 13 maximum, mean ± SD. # symbol indicates one substrain differs significantly from the other two at that time point with a P-value less than 0.05.

B6N transcriptome is enriched for cardiac remodelling genes

Finding no obvious cause for the cardiac remodelling in the biochemistry or haematology, we wanted to determine whether changes in gene expression could underpin the differences in macro- and microstructure. To this end, we performed RNAseq on heart tissues from five 18-mo-old male mice per group. We used a CuffDiff TopHat pipeline to identify differentially expressed genes between groups. We initially performed pathway analysis on all genes using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. “Antigen presentation pathway” was the only pathway significantly up-regulated in the B6N compared with the B6J (Table S2), and there were no significantly enriched pathways between the B6N and B6J-Nnt, nor the B6J and B6J-Nnt (data not shown). We subsequently filtered the expression data for genes which were regulated in a strain-dependent manner (87 genes, Fig 3A and Table S3) and in an NNT-dependent manner (64 genes, Fig 3B and Table S4) (q < 0.05). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed an overrepresentation of genes associated with muscle contraction in the strain-dependent analysis (Fig 3C) and numerous pathways associated with immune responses in NNT-dependent genes (Fig 3D).

Figure 3. RNAseq reveals strain-dependent and NNT-dependent genes.

Figure 3.

Differentially expressed genes generated by CuffDiff TopHat pipeline, clustered according to the expression profile across samples. Values for each cell are calculated as the log2[x + 1], where x is the counts for that gene. Each subsequent value for a gene is then subtracted from the average of all the values for that gene. These values are then used to generate the heat map. Mouse group indicated at the base of each column. (A) Heat map of gene list segregated by strain. (B) Heat map of gene list segregated by NNT status. (A, C) Gene Ontology list generated by Panther open access software from gene list in (A). (B, D) Gene Ontology list generated by Panther open access software from gene list in (B).

Within the cluster of genes associated with muscle contraction, we found many genes typically associated with cardiac remodelling up-regulated in the B6N: myosin heavy chain 7 (Myh7), myosin light chain 4 (Myl4), myosin light chain 7 (Myl7), troponin T1, skeletal type (Tnnt1), natriuretic peptide precursor A (Nppa), and natriuretic peptide precursor B (Nppb). These genes are markers of hypertrophy and are often altered in the heart in disease states as the tissue reverts to a more “foetal” expression pattern 24, 25, 26. The expression levels of these genes and their associated binding partners were assessed in the three age-groups by RT-qPCR (Fig 4). Some of the differentially expressed cardiac genes were significantly altered on RT-qPCR (Myh7 and Tnnt1), whereas the others showed a strain-dependent trend. No sequence variants were found in these genes to explain their differential expressions (Table S5).

Figure 4. RT-qPCR analysis of key cardiac genes.

Figure 4.

Collated RT-qPCR data. All RT-qPCR expression values generated by ∆∆CT method. Actc1, actin, alpha, cardiac muscle 1; Myh6, myosin heavy chain 6; Myh7, myosin heavy chain 7; Myl2, myosin light chain 2; Myl3, myosin light chain 3; Myl4, myosin light chain 4; Myl7, myosin light chain 7; Nppa, natriuretic peptide precursor A; Nppb, natriuretic peptide precursor B; Tnnt1, troponin T1, skeletal type; Tnnt2, troponin T2, cardiac type. RT-qPCR expression of key cardiac genes. Kruskal–Wallis test at each time point, n = 4, mean ± SD. # symbol indicates one substrain differs significantly from the other two at that time point with a P-value less than 0.05.

Variant calling pipeline highlights Mylk3 as the likely causative gene

It is unclear whether the gene expression changes we see are drivers of or responses to the DCM phenotype. Almost all genes within the cardiac remodelling cluster have been linked to cardiomyopathies, not limited to the dilated form (27). We mined the RNAseq data for genetic variants between the B6N and B6J, seeking variants which might explain the differential gene expression patterns or be causal of the phenotype. Compared with the Mus musculus reference genome (B6J), 43 variants amongst the B6N and B6J substrains were identified, 38 in the B6N and 5 in the B6J, potentially affecting 63 genes (Table S5). A variant in Mylk3, Chr8:85365179A>T, c-5T>A, SNP ID rs245783224, was considered a good candidate because it is almost exclusively expressed in the heart, with ablation resulting in cardiac dysfunction, which is modest in the germ line knockout (28, 29, 30). In humans, it is highly expressed in heart and ∼10-fold lower in skeletal muscle, with two recent articles showing an association of variants in MYLK3 with DCM (31, 32).

Point mutation in Mylk3 abolishes protein expression in B6N mice

We confirmed this mutation was present in B6N and absent in B6J mice by Sanger sequencing (Fig 5A) and that this had no effect on mRNA expression (Fig 5B). Of the 36 inbred mouse strains sequenced by the Sanger Mouse Genomes Project (33), only the C57BL/6NJ mouse has the variant. The mutation introduces a putative translation initiation site (TIS), 5-bp upstream of the canonical TIS. We used a series of Kozak signature prediction software to assess whether the new TIS created by the mutation would be a better match for translation initiation than the canonical TIS (Fig 5C) (34, 35, 36). TIS miner and NetStart 1.0 predicted the variant weakens the canonical TIS and PreTIS predicted the new ATG to form an alternative TIS with a very high confidence score (0.93) (37). The predicted protein product from this novel TIS would be out of frame and result in an altered protein with a molecular weight of 3.2 kD. In keeping with this, MYLK3 protein expression in the B6N mice was absent by Western blot (Fig 5D). It is important to note MYLK3 expression was absent at all three ages, showing the “genotype” of these mice with respect to MYLK3 was consistent across all groups (Fig S5C and D). We also performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (Fig S5A and B), finding no MYLK3 expression in the C57BL/6N mice. Intriguingly, we found a gradient of staining in the C57BL/6J mice, with high staining in the papillary muscles and at the midline of the tissue and less in the endocardium and at the base and apex. This was surprising, as it is in stark contrast to the previously reported phospho-MYL2 gradient (19).

Figure 5. SNP in Mylk3 abolishes protein expression in C57BL/6N hearts.

Figure 5.

(A) Representative chromatogram of Sanger sequencing of Mylk3 in DNA isolated from 3-mo heart samples of each group. Blue box indicates SNP and A of alternate TIS in B6N and green box indicates the canonical translation initiation site. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Mylk3 expression. One-way ANOVA at each time point; n = 5, mean ± SD. (C) Kozak signature analysis of translation initiation site in B6J (upper pane) and B6N (lower pane) showing the alternate TIS for the B6N variant. (D) Western blot staining of GAPDH and MYLK3 in 3-mo heart tissue lysates.

Figure S5. B6N stain negative for MYLK3, whereas B6J hearts show a gradient of expression.

Figure S5.

(A) Immunohistochemical staining of MYLK3 in paraffin heart sections. Scale bar = 4,000 μm. (B, D) Quantification of IHC staining in (D). Kruskal–Wallis, n = 3 mice, three sections per mouse, mean ± SD. (C, D) MYLK3 expression is absent at 12 (C) and 18 (D) mo.

To verify the deleterious effect of this variant on protein translation, a luciferase reporter assay was performed using vectors containing either the wild-type (B6J) or variant (B6N) 5′ UTRs of Mylk3 transcript variant 1 (NM_175441.5), immediately upstream of the luciferase start codon. Luciferase signal was normalised by co-transfecting with a GFP vector and normalising luminescence to fluorescence (Fig 6A). Luciferase activity was significantly lower in HEK293T cells transfected with the “B6N-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc” vector than those transfected with “B6J-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc,” indicating the mutation is sufficient to abrogate protein translation (Fig 6B). This was confirmed by expressing MYLK3 constructs with the respective 5′ UTRs under a T7 promoter in a cell-free protein expression system (Promega). The B6J-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc construct produced a protein at ∼86 kD, whereas B6N-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc showed negligible expression (Fig 6C) and no other protein was detected. This ∼86-kD protein was confirmed to be MYLK3 by Western blotting (Fig 6D).

Figure 6. 5′UTR MYLK3 mutation in C57BL/6N is sufficient to abrogate protein expression.

Figure 6.

(A) Luminescence (upper panel) and fluorescence (lower panel) signal in cells transfected with a combination of empty vector, GFP, and luciferase vectors signified by the table. Representative experiment from three experimental repeats with six technical replicates. (B) Normalised luminescence. One-way ANOVA Brown–Forsythe and Welch test; n = 3, mean ± SD. (C) Coupled transcription–translation expression of genes under control of T7 promoter: Sample in lane 1 contains no template DNA; lane 2 contains a luciferase control vector; lane 3 contains a pcDNA3.1(+) vector expressing MYLK3 with the 5′UTR from C57BL/6J mice; lane 4 contains a pcDNA3.1(+) vector expressing MYLK3 with the 5′UTR from C57BL/6N mice. Proteins detected by chemiluminescent substrate. (D) Samples as above, detected by blotting with MYLK3. (C, D) are representative of three repeats.

We analysed the other three myosin light chain kinase genes, suspecting one of these may compensate for the absence of MYLK3 in the B6N mouse. RNAseq data revealed Mylk and Mylk2 expression levels were very low in the heart; however, Mylk4 expression level was similar to Mylk3. Interestingly, Mylk4 expression was higher in the B6N mice and was identified as a strain-dependent gene by RNAseq (Table S2). MYLK4 could phosphorylate key targets in the absence of MYLK3 in the B6N, and this may allow the mice to survive to adulthood. RT-qPCR revealed Mylk4 was ∼1.8-fold higher in the B6N group at both 3 and 12 mo; however, there was no difference in protein expression and is, therefore, unlikely to be able to compensate for loss of MYLK3 (data not shown).

Discussion

Since the discovery of the unique Nnt mutations in B6J mice, many groups have used this mouse in conjunction with the B6N to study the role of Nnt, as one might with a traditional knockout and corresponding wild-type model (13, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 43). In contrast to previous studies linking Nnt to cardiac function (12,13,14,16), we show that Nnt expression levels do not correlate with the DCM phenotype, although a number of gene expression profiles tracked with Nnt status in our mouse models (Fig 3B). Instead, we identify a mutation in Mylk3 in B6N mice that abolishes protein expression and likely causes DCM, whereas MYLK3-replete B6J mice are unaffected. Interestingly, the same Mylk3 variant (g.chr8:85365179A>T; c.-5T>A) was previously described and, although that study found no evidence of DCM at an early time point (16 wk), it did show the B6N heart papillary muscles contracted with less force than those from B6J hearts (44).

Here, we show B6N cardiomyocytes are “stretched,” reflected by a thinning of the sarcomeres within each cell but found no difference in individual sarcomere length. The latter finding is particularly interesting, as one might expect volume overload to stretch the muscle fibres and increase the sarcomere length. Increases in sarcomere length enhance the calcium sensitivity of the fibres and increase contractility (45). The lack of significant difference in sarcomere length may be due to the comparatively small difference in cardiomyocyte length. It is unclear what the effect of sarcomere narrowing may be on contractility. It may increase the frequency of actin and myosin crossbridge formation; however, the evidence for this is unclear (46, 47).

Mylk3 is a very plausible candidate for the genesis of the DCM seen in B6N mice. A previous study generated Mylk3−/− mice and showed they develop a similar phenotype of dilated ventricles, reduced fractional shortening, and reduced ejection fraction, whereas their phenotype is similarly nonlethal (28). As the cardiac isoform of the family of myosin light chain kinases, MYLK3 phosphorylates MYL2 and potentially autophosphorylates itself (44, 48). MYLK3 expression is also important for sarcomere assembly. Knockdown of MYLK3 impaired sarcomere assembly in cultured cells and in zebra fish (49). Conditional adult-onset Mylk3 knockout mice have drastically reduced MYL2 phosphorylation which precedes heart failure (29, 30), whereas germ line ablation causes mice to develop DCM in adulthood, and perinatal ablation produces an intermediate phenotype (28). A previous report demonstrated B6N mice have reduced rather than absent MYL2 phosphorylation (44) because of absence of MYLK3, but it has been postulated that another myosin light chain kinase family member could be maintaining the residual phosphorylation seen (50).

Phosphorylation of MYL2 is important for the assembly of actin fibres, and overexpression of MYLK3 increases the speed of the contractions and relaxations of a spontaneously beating cardiac cell culture model (19, 48). MYL2-knockout mice are embryonic lethal (51), yet MYL2 phosphomutants (S14A and S15A) survive to adulthood, develop DCM and, although more than half survive beyond 12 mo, die at a significantly quicker rate (52). The disparity in survival between these different mutants and the germ line versus adult-onset MYLK3 knockouts is worth remarking. Given the lethality of conditional adult MYLK3 knockouts, it has been suggested that the lack of MYLK3 in germ line knockouts during development allows the heart to adapt, whereas this ability is lost when the knockout is induced in adulthood, as these mice develop heart failure and die (28, 29, 30). Intriguingly, we found up-regulation of Mylk4 expression, present at relatively high levels in the heart, but this up-regulation was absent at the protein level. It is likely another unidentified protein is compensating for the loss of MYLK3 during development, facilitating survival and limiting disease progression. Discovering the identity of this kinase will be important to future work into the role and of MYLK3, in both the broader context of its activity and for the C57BL/6N mouse.

The lack of MYLK3 may also explain the differential responses to stresses such as transverse aortic constriction (TAC) and angiotensin II treatment observed in other studies comparing C57BL/6 mouse substrains (15, 17). The B6N substrains had dilated ventricles, thinner muscle walls, and increased expression of foetal gene Nppb compared with a B6J substrain after TAC (17) and showed increased fibrosis and foetal gene expression in response to chronic angiotensin II treatment (15). Interestingly, B6N mice die at a far greater rate than B6J mice after TAC (17). This mimics the increased mortality in Mylk3−/− mice compared with WT littermates after TAC (28). We believe the increased mortality in B6N mice is due to the Mylk3 mutation present in this substrain.

In our RNAseq data, we find B6N hearts express four times more Myh7 than hearts from the two B6J substrains. Myh7 is one of two main cardiac myosin heavy chain isoforms, the other being myosin heavy chain 6 (Myh6) (53). In humans, MYH7 is predominant in the ventricles, whereas MYH6 is predominant in atria (54, 55). In mice, this pattern is observed only during embryogenesis, and then MYH6 is the main isoform across the whole heart (56). Although believed to have arisen from a duplication event, the two isoforms have distinct sequences and activities as myosin heavy chain proteins: MYH6 is a “fast-twitch” cardiac isoform, with faster binding kinetics and contraction speed than MYH7 (24). Isolated papillary muscles from B6N mice contract more slowly and with less force and relax slower than the equivalent muscle isolates from B6J mice.

However, it is equally possible that the increase in Myh7 in B6N reflects a stress adaptation of the tissue due to the dilation, particularly as the RNAseq was performed on 18-mo heart tissues. Under conditions of stress, transcription of foetal genes such as Myh7 are often increased and this is thought to be due to a de-repression of their expression by microRNAs (25, 26, 57) The picture is not quite so clear in our case, as the levels of other foetal genes, particularly Nppa and Nppb, are higher in the B6J substrains. This may reflect a more complicated regulation by distinct microRNAs, but we believe the difference in Myh7 expression is a response to the dilation of the ventricles, rather than its genesis.

The C57BL/6 strain is the most widely used laboratory strain, initially made popular for its strong breeding characteristics; the B6J substrain, originating in The Jackson Laboratory, is by far the most widely used substrain, accounting for 90% of all published references to the C57BL/6 strain. However, over the past decade, international mouse knockout initiatives, the IMPC, European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis (EUCOMM), and the National Institutes of Health Knockout Mouse (KOMP) have moved to the C57BL/6N as a background strain because of greater ES cell efficiency for homologous recombination (58, 59).

It is becoming increasingly clear that these two closely related substrains have many more genetic/phenotypic differences than is widely appreciated. Worryingly, one review found that in the journal Diabetes, 63% of all published articles between 2010 and 2014 that used a variant of the C57BL/6 strain and made no mention of the exact substrain used (6), instead simply stating C57BL/6 mice were used. This appears to be true with other mouse strains, as the authors found 58.5% of all methods sections did not report the exact substrain with sufficient completeness. Aided by next-generation sequencing approaches, there are now sizeable databases documenting the many genetic differences between mouse substrains, including those involving the B6J and B6N (23, 33, 60, 61, 62). These produce remarkably different phenotypes regarding weight, blood pressure, bone density, blood glucose, and cardiovascular traits (3, 17, 23, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68). In this regard, using the partly compromised B6N model, phenotypic effects may be more apparent and may help us unveil new important cardiac genes, and hence new therapies. However, caution must be advised, as researchers may want to avoid labelling effector genes as “causative” of CM or “essential” for cardiac function when made on the 6N background.

Conclusions

We have described a Mylk3 mutation that is probably responsible for a modest CM in the C57BL/6N substrain and demonstrated that NNT ablation in the C57BL/6J mouse does not, by itself, cause a cardiac phenotype. The Mylk3 mutation is absent in all other mouse substrains sequenced in the Mouse Genomes Project including the closely related C57BL/6J mouse. However, many other genomic variants exist between substrains, the consequences of which are only gradually being uncovered (61, 69, 70). We clearly demonstrate how a single gene defect can cause susceptibility to a particular phenotype in a mouse substrain, in this case CM in the B6N. Hence, this study accentuates the importance, in a wider setting, of knowing the genetic defects in your mouse substrain and highlights the value of selecting your mouse background with care.

Materials and Methods

Animal husbandry

All mice were bred, housed, and culled at Medical Research Council Harwell, and therefore, the husbandry was identical for all three substrains. Only male mice were used in this study. Mice were kept and studied in accordance with the UK Home Office legislation and local ethical guidelines issued by the Medical Research Council (Responsibility in the Use of Animals for Medical Research, July 1993; Home Office license 30/3146). Mice were kept under controlled light (light 7 am–7 pm, dark 7 pm–7 am), temperature (21°C ± 2°C), and humidity (55% ± 10%) conditions. They had free access to water (9–13 ppm chlorine) and were fed ad libitum on a commercial diet (SDS Rat and Mouse No. 3 Breeding diet, RM3, 3.6 kcal/g). The mouse strains used were C57BL/6NTac originally from Taconic (Taconic Biosciences), C57BL/6J distributed by Charles River (Charles River UK), and C57BL/6J mice carrying a bacterial artificial chromosome transgene to restore murine Nnt (officially C57BL/6J-Tg(RP22-455H18)TG1Rdc/H). All mice used were no more than 10 generations of mating removed from restock.

Echocardiography

A week before culling, the cardiac phenotype of each cohort of mice was assessed using echocardiography. The mice were anaesthetised under 4% isoflurane, then maintained at 1.5–2% for the duration. For the echocardiogram, the left ventricle of the heart was imaged and analysed using the Vevo770 (FUJIFILM VisualSonics) according to the IMPC phenotyping protocol. More details of this procedure can be found on www.mousephenotype.org/impress.

Clinical chemistry

Free-fed mice were terminally anaesthetised at 3, 12, or 18 mo with isoflurane, and blood was collected from the retro-orbital sinus using uncoated glass capillary tubes (Cat. no. 612-2439; VWR) into either lithium heparin or EDTA-coated paediatric tubes (Cat. no. 078028 & 077030; Kabe Labortechnik). Lithium heparin samples were kept on wet ice and centrifuged within 1 h of collection for 10 min at 5,000g in a refrigerated centrifuge set to 8°C. Plasma samples were analysed for sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, triglycerides, free fatty acids, and total-, high-density lipoprotein–, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on board a Beckman Coulter AU680 clinical chemistry analyser using reagents and settings recommended by the manufacturer and as per the IMPC phenotyping pipeline (http://www.mousephenotype.org/impress/procedures/7).

Tissue isolation

After bleeding, mice were dissected under a laminar flow tissue culture hood. Tissues were removed and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen or immersed in 4% PFA. All animals were culled between 1,000 and 1,130 h. All animal protocols in this study were approved by the United Kingdom Home Office.

Heart weights and tibia lengths

Frozen isolated heart tissues were weighed to an accuracy of 0.1 mg. Tibia lengths of C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mice were measured using X-ray at 13 wk.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from the mouse tail tissue using a DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN). Mice were genotyped for Nnt status using previously published primers (3).

Tissue extraction for RNA-Seq

Five 18-mo-old mice of the three different substrains were used per group. RNA was isolated from intact hearts using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). RNA samples were processed by INVIEW Transcriptome Discover service (GATC Biotech) and resultant FASTQ files processed as follows.

Quality filtering

We used Trim Galore (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/), a wrapper tool around Cutadapt (71) and FastQC (72) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), to filter reads with quality Phred score cutoff less than 20 and trim Illumina TruSeq adapters in FASTQ files.

Differential gene expression

We used TopHat (73) to align quality filtered reads to the M. musculus reference genome (GRCm38) (74), discarding final read alignments having more than two mismatches. We obtained 89.0%, 88.8%, and 87.8% concordant pair alignment rate for heart knockout, wild-type, and rescue, respectively. Finally, we used CuffDiff (75) to calculate expression in samples and test the statistical significance of each observed change in expression between them, using a q-value of <0.05 as the threshold for significance.

RNAseq variant calling

We followed GATK pipeline for variant calling in RNAseq (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/documentation/article.php?id=3891). We used the STAR 2-pass method from STAR aligner (76, 77) to align the quality filtered reads to the reference genome downloaded from ftp://ftp-mouse.sanger.ac.uk/ref/GRCm38_68.fa. Then, we used Picard to add read groups, sort, and mark duplicates (https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). We used SplitNCigarReads from GATK (78, 79, 80), to split reads into exon segments and hard-clip any sequences overhanging into the intronic regions. We then applied indel realignment and base recalibration from GATK. Finally, we used HaplotypeCaller (81 Preprint) for variant calling. Variants were validated by visualising alignments in the Integrative Genomics Viewer browser (82) from the Broad Institute.

Compared with the M. musculus reference genome (6J), 79 variants amongst the B6N and B6J substrains were identified, potentially affecting 98 genes. Visual inspection of these variants in Integrative Genomics Viewer browser allowed us to eliminate 35 variants on the basis (mostly) of misalignment of short-read sequencing in repetitive regions, leaving 43 variants which differed from the B6J reference sequence with the potential to affect 63 genes. 38 of these varied in the B6N substrain with the remaining five in B6J, all were biallelic with the exception of one variant, in cue domain-containing protein 1 (Cuedc1) which was monoallelic in B6J. This apparent heterozygosity is likely due to alignment of short sequencing reads to more than one locus.

Amongst the biallelic variants, the one in Mylk3, Chr8:85365179A>T, c-5T>A, SNP ID rs245783224, was considered a likely candidate because MYLK3 is almost exclusively expressed in the heart, with ablation resulting in cardiac dysfunction, which is modest in the germ line knockout (28, 29, 30). In humans, it is highly expressed in heart with two recent articles showing an association of variants in MYLK3 with DCM (31, 32).

GO-term analysis

Gene lists were analysed using Panther Gene List analysis and a statistical overrepresentation test. GO terms for pathways overrepresented in these lists were generated by the software (83, 84).

RT-qPCR

We isolated RNA from whole tissues using the TRIzol method, followed by a sodium acetate–ethanol cleanup to remove salt contamination (85, 86). Genomic DNA was removed by comprehensive DNAse treatment and RNA was converted to cDNA (Invitrogen). cDNA was then used to assess RNA expression by qPCR, calculated by the ∆∆CT method (Kapa Biosystems). Amplicons obtained from manually designed primers were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (GATC).

Primers were manually designed using PrimerQuest Tool (Integrated DNA Technologies) and synthesised by Sigma-Aldrich (Merck). Primer sequences are listed in the following table.

Individual gene names with corresponding forward and reverse primer sequences for RT-qPCR. Sequences are all expressed 5′ –> 3′

Gene Forward primer sequence Reverse primer sequence
Gapdh GCCTTCCGTGTTCCTACC CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTT
Myh7 CTCAAGCTGCTCAGCAATCTA GACACGGTCTGAAAGGATGAG
Myh6 GGATATTGATGACCTGGAGCTG AGCCATCTCCTCTGTTAGGT
Actc1 AGCCCTCTTTCATTGGTATGG CCTCCAGATAGGACATTGTTGG
Myl2 AGAAAGCCAAGAAGCGATAG CTCTGTTCTGGTCCATGATTGT
Myl3 GGGCGAGATGAAGATCACATAC TGGAATTGAGCTCTTCCTGTTT
Myl4 AACCCAAGCCTGAAGAGATG TCCACGAAGTCCTCATAGGT
Myl7 CGTGGCTCTTCTAATGTCTTCT CAGATGATCCCATCCCTGTTC
Tnnt1 GCCCTTGAACATCGACTACA TCAACTTCTCCATCAGGTCAAA
Tnnt2 GGAGAGAGAGTGGACTTTGATG CTTCCTCCTTCTTCCTGTTCTC
Nppa TTTGGCTTCCAGGCCATATT CATCTTCTACCGGCATCTTCTC
Nppb ACTCCTATCCTCTGGGAAGTC GCTGTCTCTGGGCCATTT
Mylk3 GAATTCCAAGGTGGCTGATTTC TCAGTACATGGTTTGGCTTCA

Western blotting

Protein lysates were obtained by homogenising and lysing tissues in radio immunoprecipitation assay buffer for 2 h at 4°C. The lysates were sonicated at 20 kHz twice for 10 s, then centrifuged at 16,000g for 15 min, and the resultant supernatants were normalised for total protein concentration with a bicinchoninic acid assay. Protein lysates were added to an equal volume of Laemmli buffer. Lysates were heated at 95°C for 5 min and then loaded into 4–12% SDS gels. Immunoblots for NNT were performed with unheated samples. Proteins were then separated based on size using electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Sigma-Aldrich) by semi-dry transfer blot (Bio-Rad) at 15 V for 1 h. Membranes were probed with a target antibody and GAPDH. Antibodies used are as follows: mouse anti-NNT (1:1,000, HPA004829; Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-TNNT2 (1:2,000, Cat. no. ab8295, RRID:AB_306445; Abcam), mouse anti-Sarcomeric Alpha Actinin (1:2,000, Cat. no. ab9465, RRID:AB_307264; Abcam), rabbit anti-MYLK3 (1:1,000, Cat. no. AP7965a, RRID:AB_2266783; Abgent), rabbit anti-GADPH (1:2,000, Cat. no. ab9485, RRID:AB_307275; Abcam), and rabbit anti-MYL2 (1:5,000, Cat. no. ab79935, RRID:AB_1952220; Abcam).

H&E

Freshly isolated hearts were immersed in 4% PFA on ice overnight. Tissues were then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. We cut 7-μm sagittal sections through the tissues, making note of serial section number. Sections obtained at similar planes were then used for haematoxylin and eosin staining using a Leica Autostainer (87). Briefly, tissue sections were washed in distilled water followed by staining with Gill’s 3 Hematoxylin to stain nuclei and Eosin Y to counterstain cytoplasmic regions. We imaged stained sections using a Panoramic 250 (3D Histech) slide scanner with CaseViewer software.

Masson’s Trichrome

We stained paraffin-embedded heart sections as described in reference 88. Briefly, we fixed sections in Bouin’s solution for 1 h followed by intense washing. We then stained fixed sections with Weigert’s haematoxylin (nuclei), Biebrich scarlet-acid fuchsin solution (plasma), and Aniline Blue (collagen). We imaged stained sections using a Panoramic 250 (3D Histech) slide scanner with Panoramic Viewer software. We assessed fibrosis in these images in ImageJ using a colour threshold–detecting blue staining, determined by a pre-nominated window for colour hue, and passing a fixed intensity threshold.

Immunohistochemistry

We used two detection methods for protein localisation, one using chromogenic diaminobenzidine oxidation assays and the other epifluorescence coupled with conjugate fluorescent dyes. Chromogenic diaminobenzidine staining of MYLK3 was performed by a Ventana automated staining station using the OmniMap Rabbit HRP (Roche). We imaged stained sections using a Panoramic 250 (3D Histech) slide scanner with CaseViewer software.

For epifluorescence staining, paraffin tissue sections were cleared and dehydrated followed by boiling in a citrate buffer to expose protein epitopes. Specimens were then blocked in a BSA–serum mixture, followed by primary antibody incubation overnight. Samples were washed and incubated with secondary antibody, washed and finally mounted in an aqueous mountant. For immunofluorescent sections, tissues were counterstained with DAPI and wheat germ agglutinin Alexa Fluor 555 conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before background removal with TrueView Autofluorescence quenching kit (Vector Labs) followed by mounting in VectaShield mounting medium. Fluorescent slides were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 880 with Airyscan and quantified by MyofibrilJ package in ImageJ. DAB-stained slides were imaged using a Panoramic 250 (3D Histech) slide scanner with CaseViewer software. For sarcomeric morphometrics, longitudinal and transverse heart sections were used to measure the long axis (longitudinal sections) and CSA (transverse section) of individual cardiomyocytes delineated by WGA, alpha-actinin (1:5,000, Cat. no. ab9465, RRID:AB_307264; Abcam), and MYL2 (1:1,000, Cat. no. ab79935, RRID:AB_1952220; Abcam) staining. Confocal microscopy was performed with an LSM880 Microscope (Zeiss) on a 63× objective.

Luciferase assay

The 5′ UTR of Mylk3 transcript variant 1 from B6N or B6J mice was cloned immediately upstream of the luciferase ORF in PGL3 (Promega) by Gibson cloning (89) from a gBlock (Integrated DNA Technologies) to create the reporter constructs “B6N-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc” and “B6J-5′UTR-Mylk3-Luc.” A CMV promoter and enhancer was also substituted for the SV40 promoter to increase expression. All constructs were verified by sequencing. 50 ng of reporter vector or control vector (pcDNA3.1(+)) was co-transfected with 50 ng pcDNA3.1(+) expressing GFP using lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen). 24 h post-transfection the cells were incubated with a luciferase recording medium containing D-luciferin at 0.45 mg/ml and bioluminescence was recorded in an integrated ClarioStar microplate reader (BMG Labtech) for 30 min. The plate was washed three times in PBS, and GFP fluorescence was recorded. Luciferase activity was normalised to fluorescence to control for transfection efficiency. The experiment was performed three times with six technical repeats per experiment.

Coupled transcription/translation assay

A MYLK3 ORF clone generated by GenScript (Clone ID: OMu23765) in the pcDNA3.1(+) vector was used as the backbone for subsequent 5′UTR cloning. 5′ UTR of B6N and B6J MYLK3 was cloned immediately upstream of the canonical ATG and immediately downstream of the T7 promoter by Gibson Assembly (89) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. 1 μg of plasmid was added to 40 μl of TnT Quick Master Mix (Promega) with 1 μl of methionine and 1 μl of Transcend Biotin-Lysyl-tRNA and incubated at 30°C for 1 h. A negative control reaction was set up containing no plasmid DNA, and a positive control containing a luciferase expression vector. The products of each reaction were separated by SDS–PAGE and then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked in 5% BSA and incubated with MYLK3 and detected by Western blot protocol or with streptavidin–HRP conjugate and incubated for 2 h, followed by detection with substrate as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Membranes were visualised using a Licor Odyssey Fc and ImageStudio software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical tests are described on a per experiment basis in the figure legends describing the experiment in question.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NCBI Bioproject repository: Bioproject ID PRJNA531833, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/531833.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Keith Burling of the Core Biochemical Assay Laboratory, Cambridge, and Tertius Hough, Pathology Operations Manager at Medical Research Council Harwell Institute, for analysing the plasma and urine samples. We are also grateful to the Pathology Facility and the Light Microscopy Facility of the Barts Cancer Institute for their help with histology and imaging. All acknowledged authors have provided permission to be named in the manuscript. Sources of funding: This work was supported by Barts Charity grant MGU0361 to JL Williams, the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under Rea grant agreement 608765 to S Awad, the Medical Research Council grant 165071 to J Nicholson, by a Marie Sklodowska Curie Innovative Training Network programme award (721532) to D Grzesik, a Medical Research Council grant MR/R02426X/1 to J Botta, a British Heart Foundation grant RG/15/15/31742 to A Tinker, and Medical Research Council grant MC_U142661184 to RD Cox. The work is facilitated by the National Institute for Health Research Barts Biomedical Research Centre.

Author Contributions

  • JL Williams: conceptualization, resources, data curation, software, formal analysis, validation, investigation, visualization, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

  • A Paudyal: resources and data curation.

  • S Awad: software, formal analysis, and visualization.

  • J Nicholson: software, formal analysis, and investigation.

  • D Grzesik: data curation.

  • J Botta: resources and methodology.

  • E Meimaridou: conceptualization, data curation, and investigation.

  • AV Maharaj: data curation.

  • M Stewart: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, and project administration.

  • A Tinker: resources, supervision, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • RD Cox: funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, and project administration.

  • LA Metherell: conceptualization, resources, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Zhao W, Zhao T, Chen Y, Zhao F, Gu Q, Williams RW, Bhattacharya SK, Lu L, Sun Y (2015) A murine hypertrophic cardiomyopathy model: The DBA/2J strain. PLoS One 10: e0133132 10.1371/journal.pone.0133132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kraev A. (2014) Parallel universes of black six biology. Biol Direct 9: 18 10.1186/1745-6150-9-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang T-T, Naeemuddin M, Elchuri S, Yamaguchi M, Kozy HM, Carlson EJ, Epstein CJ (2006) Genetic modifiers of the phenotype of mice deficient in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase. Hum Mol Genet 15: 1187–1194. 10.1093/hmg/ddl034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coley WD, Bogdanik L, Vila MC, Yu Q, Van Der Meulen JH, Rayavarapu S, Novak JS, Nearing M, Quinn JL, Saunders A, et al. (2016) Effect of genetic background on the dystrophic phenotype in mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet 25: 130–145. 10.1093/hmg/ddv460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Riordan JD, Nadeau JH (2017) From peas to disease: Modifier genes, network resilience, and the genetics of health. Am J Hum Genet 101: 177–191. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fontaine DA, Davis DB (2016) Attention to background strain is essential for metabolic research: C57BL/6 and the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Diabetes 65: 25–33. 10.2337/db15-0982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barnabei MS, Palpant NJ, Metzger JM (2010) Influence of genetic background on ex vivo and in vivo cardiac function in several commonly used inbred mouse strains. Physiol Genomics 42A: 103–113. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00071.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Duleu S, Vincendeau P, Courtois P, Semballa S, Lagroye I, Daulouède S, Boucher J-L, Wilson KT, Veyret B, Gobert AP (2004) Mouse strain susceptibility to trypanosome infection: An arginase-dependent effect. J Immunol 172: 6298–6303. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.6298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bothe GWM, Bolivar VJ, Vedder MJ, Geistfeld JG (2005) Behavioral differences among fourteen inbred mouse strains commonly used as disease models. Comp Med 55: 326–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meimaridou E, Hughes CR, Kowalczyk J, Guasti L, Chapple JP, King PJ, Chan LF, Clark AJL, Metherell LA (2013) Familial glucocorticoid deficiency: New genes and mechanisms. Mol Cell Endocrinol 371: 195–200. 10.1016/j.mce.2012.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meimaridou E, Kowalczyk J, Guasti L, Hughes CR, Wagner F, Frommolt P, Nürnberg P, Mann NP, Banerjee R, Saka HN, et al. (2012) Mutations in nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (NNT) cause familial glucocorticoid deficiency. Nat Genet 44: 740–742. 10.1038/ng.2299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roucher-Boulez F, Mallet-Motak D, Samara-Boustani D, Jilani H, Ladjouze A, Souchon P-F, Simon D, Nivot S, Heinrichs C, Ronze M, et al. (2016) NNT mutations: A cause of primary adrenal insufficiency, oxidative stress and extra-adrenal defects. Eur J Endocrinol 175: 73–84. 10.1530/eje-16-0056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leskov I, Neville A, Shen X, Pardue S, Kevil CG, Granger DN, Krzywanski DM (2017) Nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase activity impacts mitochondrial redox balance and the development of hypertension in mice. J Am Soc Hypertens 11: 110–121. 10.1016/j.jash.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nickel AG, von Hardenberg A, Hohl M, Löffler JR, Kohlhaas M, Becker J, Reil J-C, Kazakov A, Bonnekoh J, Stadelmaier M, et al. (2015) Reversal of mitochondrial transhydrogenase causes oxidative stress in heart failure. Cell Metab 22: 472–484. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cardin S, Scott-Boyer M-P, Praktiknjo S, Jeidane S, Picard S, Reudelhuber TL, Deschepper CF (2014) Differences in cell-type-specific responses to angiotensin II explain cardiac remodeling differences in C57BL/6 mouse substrains. Hypertension 64: 1040–1046. 10.1161/hypertensionaha.114.04067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bainbridge MN, Davis EE, Choi W-Y, Dickson A, Martinez HR, Wang M, Dinh H, Muzny DM, Pignatelli R, Katsanis N, et al. (2015) Loss of function mutations in NNT are associated with left ventricular noncompaction. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 8: 544–552. 10.1161/circgenetics.115.001026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garcia-Menendez L, Karamanlidis G, Kolwicz S, Tian R (2013) Substrain specific response to cardiac pressure overload in C57BL/6 mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305: H397–H402. 10.1152/ajpheart.00088.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freeman HC, Hugill A, Dear NT, Ashcroft FM, Cox RD (2006) Deletion of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase: A new quantitive trait locus accounting for glucose intolerance in C57BL/6J mice. Diabetes 55: 2153–2156. 10.2337/db06-0358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Davis JS, Hassanzadeh S, Winitsky S, Lin H, Satorius C, Vemuri R, Aletras AH, Wen H, Epstein ND (2001) The overall pattern of cardiac contraction depends on a spatial gradient of myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation. Cell 107: 631–641. 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00586-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yadav S, Sitbon YH, Kazmierczak K, Szczesna-Cordary D (2019) Hereditary heart disease: Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and animal models of HCM, RCM, and DCM associated with mutations in cardiac myosin light chains. Pflugers Arch 471: 683–699. 10.1007/s00424-019-02257-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shiels HA, White E (2008) The Frank–Starling mechanism in vertebrate cardiac myocytes. J Exp Biol 211: 2005–2013. 10.1242/jeb.003145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bensley JG, Matteo RD, Harding R, Black MJ (2016) Three-dimensional direct measurement of cardiomyocyte volume, nuclearity, and ploidy in thick histological sections. Scientific Rep 6: 23756 10.1038/srep23756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Simon MM, Greenaway S, White JK, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Wells S, Sorg T, Wong K, Bedu E, Cartwright EJ, et al. (2013) A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains. Genome Biol 14: R82 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-r82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alpert NR, Brosseau C, Federico A, Krenz M, Robbins J, Warshaw DM (2002) Molecular mechanics of mouse cardiac myosin isoforms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H1446–H1454. 10.1152/ajpheart.00274.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Q, Lin X, Yang X, Chang J (2010) NFATc4 is negatively regulated in miR-133a-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophic repression. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 298: H1340–H1347. 10.1152/ajpheart.00592.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Callis TE, Pandya K, Seok HY, Tang R-H, Tatsuguchi M, Huang Z-P, Chen J-F, Deng Z, Gunn B, Shumate J, et al. (2009) MicroRNA-208a is a regulator of cardiac hypertrophy and conduction in mice. J Clin Invest 119: 2772–2786. 10.1172/jci36154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wilcox JE, Hershberger RE (2018) Genetic cardiomyopathies. Curr Opin Cardiol 33: 354–362. 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Warren SA, Briggs LE, Zeng H, Chuang J, Chang EI, Terada R, Li M, Swanson MS, Lecker SH, Willis MS, et al. (2012) Myosin light chain phosphorylation is critical for adaptation to cardiac stress. Circulation 126: 2575–2588. 10.1161/circulationaha.112.116202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Massengill MT, Ashraf HM, Chowdhury RR, Chrzanowski SM, Kar J, Warren SA, Walter GA, Zeng H, Kang B-H, Anderson RH, et al. (2016) Acute heart failure with cardiomyocyte atrophy induced in adult mice by ablation of cardiac myosin light chain kinase. Cardiovasc Res 111: 34–43. 10.1093/cvr/cvw069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Islam YFK, Joseph R, Chowdhury RR, Anderson RH, Kasahara H (2016) Heart failure induced by perinatal ablation of cardiac myosin light chain kinase. Front Physiol 7: 480 10.3389/fphys.2016.00480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hodatsu A, Fujino N, Uyama Y, Tsukamoto O, Imai-Okazaki A, Yamazaki S, Seguchi O, Konno T, Hayashi K, Kawashiri M-A, et al. (2019) Impact of cardiac myosin light chain kinase gene mutation on development of dilated cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Fail 6: 406–415. 10.1002/ehf2.12410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tobita T, Nomura S, Morita H, Ko T, Fujita T, Toko H, Uto K, Hagiwara N, Aburatani H, Komuro I (2017) Identification of MYLK3 mutations in familial dilated cardiomyopathy. Sci Rep 7: 17495 10.1038/s41598-017-17769-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, Yalcin B, Heger A, Agam A, Slater G, Goodson M, et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289–294. 10.1038/nature10413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kozak M. (1987) An analysis of 5′-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 15: 8125–8148. 10.1093/nar/15.20.8125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Noderer WL, Flockhart RJ, Bhaduri A, Diaz de Arce AJ, Zhang J, Khavari PA, Wang CL (2014) Quantitative analysis of mammalian translation initiation sites by FACS-seq. Mol Syst Biol 10: 748 10.15252/msb.20145136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pedersen AG, Nielsen H (1997) Neural network prediction of translation initiation sites in eukaryotes: Perspectives for EST and genome analysis. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 5: 226–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu H, Wong L (2003) Data mining tools for biological sequences. J Bioinform Comput Biol 1: 139–167. 10.1142/s0219720003000216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vozenilek AE, Vetkoetter M, Green JM, Shen X, Traylor JG, Klein RL, Orr AW, Woolard MD, Krzywanski DM (2018) Absence of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase in C57BL/6J mice exacerbates experimental atherosclerosis. J Vasc Res 55: 98–110. 10.1159/000486337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fisher-Wellman KH, Ryan TE, Smith CD, Gilliam LAA, Lin C-T, Reese LR, Torres MJ, Neufer PD (2016) A direct comparison of metabolic responses to high-fat diet in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NJ mice. Diabetes 65: 3249–3261. 10.2337/db16-0291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ronchi JA, Figueira TR, Ravagnani FG, Oliveira HCF, Vercesi AE, Castilho RF (2013) A spontaneous mutation in the nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase gene of C57BL/6J mice results in mitochondrial redox abnormalities. Free Radic Biol Med 63: 446–456. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nicholson A, Reifsnyder PC, Malcolm RD, Lucas CA, MacGregor GR, Zhang W, Leiter EH (2010) Diet-induced obesity in two C57BL/6 substrains with intact or mutant nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (Nnt) gene. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18: 1902–1905. 10.1038/oby.2009.477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ronchi JA, Francisco A, Passos LAC, Figueira TR, Castilho RF (2016) The contribution of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase to peroxide detoxification is dependent on the respiratory state and counterbalanced by other sources of NADPH in liver mitochondria. J Biol Chem 291: 20173–20187. 10.1074/jbc.m116.730473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Usami M, Okada A, Taguchi K, Hamamoto S, Kohri K, Yasui T (2018) Genetic differences in C57BL/6 mouse substrains affect kidney crystal deposition. Urolithiasis 46: 515–522. 10.1007/s00240-018-1040-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Taniguchi M, Okamoto R, Ito M, Goto I, Fujita S, Konishi K, Mizutani H, Dohi K, Hartshorne DJ, Itoh T (2015) New isoform of cardiac myosin light chain kinase and the role of cardiac myosin phosphorylation in α1-adrenoceptor mediated inotropic response. PLoS One 10: e0141130 10.1371/journal.pone.0141130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vikhorev PG, Vikhoreva NN (2018) Cardiomyopathies and related changes in contractility of human heart muscle. Int J Mol Sci 19: 2234 10.3390/ijms19082234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Konhilas JP, Irving TC, de Tombe PP (2002) Length-dependent activation in three striated muscle types of the rat. J Physiol 544: 225–236. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fuchs F, Smith SH (2001) Calcium, cross-bridges, and the Frank-Starling relationship. News Physiol Sci 16: 5–10. 10.1152/physiologyonline.2001.16.1.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chan JY, Takeda M, Briggs LE, Graham ML, Lu JT, Horikoshi N, Weinberg EO, Aoki H, Sato N, Chien KR, et al. (2008) Identification of cardiac-specific myosin light chain kinase. Circ Res 102: 571–580. 10.1161/circresaha.107.161687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Seguchi O, Takashima S, Yamazaki S, Asakura M, Asano Y, Shintani Y, Wakeno M, Minamino T, Kondo H, Furukawa H, et al. (2007) A cardiac myosin light chain kinase regulates sarcomere assembly in the vertebrate heart. J Clin Invest 117: 2812–2824. 10.1172/jci30804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chang AN, Mahajan P, Knapp S, Barton H, Sweeney HL, Kamm KE, Stull JT (2016) Cardiac myosin light chain is phosphorylated by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and -independent kinase activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113: E3824–E3833. 10.1073/pnas.1600633113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen J, Kubalak SW, Chien KR (1998) Ventricular muscle-restricted targeting of the RXRa gene reveals a non-cell-autonomous requirement in cardiac chamber morphogenesis. Development 125: 1943–1949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sheikh F, Ouyang K, Campbell SG, Lyon RC, Chuang J, Fitzsimons D, Tangney J, Hidalgo CG, Chung CS, Cheng H, et al. (2012) Mouse and computational models link Mlc2v dephosphorylation to altered myosin kinetics in early cardiac disease. J Clin Invest 122: 1209–1221. 10.1172/jci61134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.England J, Loughna S (2013) Heavy and light roles: Myosin in the morphogenesis of the heart. Cell Mol Life Sci 70: 1221–1239. 10.1007/s00018-012-1131-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Franco D, Lamers WH, Moorman AF (1998) Patterns of expression in the developing myocardium: Towards a morphologically integrated transcriptional model. Cardiovasc Res 38: 25–53. 10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00321-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Reiser PJ, Portman MA, Ning XH, Schomisch Moravec C (2001) Human cardiac myosin heavy chain isoforms in fetal and failing adult atria and ventricles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H1814–H1820. 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.4.h1814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lyons GE, Schiaffino S, Sassoon D, Barton P, Buckingham M (1990) Developmental regulation of myosin gene expression in mouse cardiac muscle. J Cell Biol 111: 2427–2436. 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ma P, Pan H, Montgomery RL, Olson EN, Schultz RM (2012) Compensatory functions of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2 regulate transcription and apoptosis during mouse oocyte development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: E481–E489. 10.1073/pnas.1118403109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brown SDM, Moore MW (2012) The international Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: Past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mamm Genome 23: 632–640. 10.1007/s00335-012-9427-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, Mujica AO, Thomas M, Harrow J, Cox T, et al. (2011) A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474: 337–342. 10.1038/nature10163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mekada K, Abe K, Murakami A, Nakamura S, Nakata H, Moriwaki K, Obata Y, Yoshiki A (2009) Genetic differences among C57BL/6 substrains. Exp Anim 58: 141–149. 10.1538/expanim.58.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kumar V, Kim K, Joseph C, Kourrich S, Yoo SH, Huang HC, Vitaterna MH, de Villena FP-M, Churchill G, Bonci A, et al. (2013) C57BL/6N mutation in Cytoplasmic FMR interacting protein 2 regulates cocaine response. Science 342: 1508–1512. 10.1126/science.1245503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Corty RW, Kumar V, Tarantino LM, Takahashi JS, Valdar W (2018) Mean-variance QTL mapping identifies novel QTL for circadian activity and exploratory behavior in mice. G3 (Bethesda) 8: 3783–3790. 10.1534/g3.118.200194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Combe R, Mudgett J, El Fertak L, Champy M-F, Ayme-Dietrich E, Petit-Demoulière B, Sorg T, Herault Y, Madwed JB, Monassier L (2016) How does circadian rhythm impact salt sensitivity of blood pressure in mice? A study in two close C57Bl/6 substrains. PLoS One 11: e0153472 10.1371/journal.pone.0153472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hoit BD, Kiatchoosakun S, Restivo J, Kirkpatrick D, Olszens K, Shao H, Pao Y-H, Nadeau JH (2002) Naturally occurring variation in cardiovascular traits among inbred mouse strains. Genomics 79: 679–685. 10.1006/geno.2002.6754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Moreth K, Fischer R, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, Wurst W, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R, Hrabě de Angelis M (2014) High-throughput phenotypic assessment of cardiac physiology in four commonly used inbred mouse strains. J Comp Physiol B 184: 763–775. 10.1007/s00360-014-0830-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shah AP, Siedlecka U, Gandhi A, Navaratnarajah M, Al-Saud SA, Yacoub MH, Terracciano CM (2010) Genetic background affects function and intracellular calcium regulation of mouse hearts. Cardiovasc Res 87: 683–693. 10.1093/cvr/cvq111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vaillant F, Lauzier B, Poirier I, Gélinas R, Rivard M-E, Robillard Frayne I, Thorin E, Des Rosiers C (2014) Mouse strain differences in metabolic fluxes and function of ex vivo working hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 306: H78–H87. 10.1152/ajpheart.00465.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mille M, Koenig X, Zebedin E, Uhrin P, Cervenka R, Todt H, Hilber K (2009) Sodium current properties of primary skeletal myocytes and cardiomyocytes derived from different mouse strains. Pflugers Arch 457: 1023–1033. 10.1007/s00424-008-0570-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ulland TK, Jain N, Hornick EE, Elliott EI, Clay GM, Sadler JJ, Mills KAM, Janowski AM, Volk APD, Wang K, et al. (2016) Nlrp12 mutation causes C57BL/6J strain-specific defect in neutrophil recruitment. Nat Commun 7: 13180 10.1038/ncomms13180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mattapallil MJ, Wawrousek EF, Chan C-C, Zhao H, Roychoudhury J, Ferguson TA, Caspi RR (2012) The Rd8 mutation of the Crb1 gene is present in vendor lines of C57BL/6N mice and embryonic stem cells, and confounds ocular induced mutant phenotypes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53: 2921–2927. 10.1167/iovs.12-9662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Martin M. (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17: 10–12. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Babraham Bioinformatics: FastQC A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available at https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed April 3, 2018.
  • 73.Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25: 1105–1111. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kuhn RM, Haussler D, Kent WJ (2013) The UCSC genome browser and associated tools. Brief Bioinform 14: 144–161. 10.1093/bib/bbs038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L (2013) Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol 31: 46–53. 10.1038/nbt.2450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR (2013) STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29: 15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Engström PG, Steijger T, Sipos B, Grant GR, Kahles A, The RGASP Consortium, Rätsch G, Goldman N, Hubbard TJ, Harrow J, et al. (2013) Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data. Nat Methods 10: 1185–1191. 10.1038/nmeth.2722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, et al. (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20: 1297–1303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43: 491–498. 10.1038/ng.806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, Jordan T, Shakir K, Roazen D, Thibault J, et al. (2013) From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: The genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 43: 11.10.1–11.10.33. 10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Poplin R, Ruano-Rubio V, DePristo MA, Fennell TJ, Carneiro MO, der Auwera GAV, Kling DE, Gauthier LD, Levy-Moonshine A, Roazen D, et al. (2017) Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. BioRxiv: 201178 10.1101/201178 (Preprint posted January, 2017) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29: 24–26. 10.1038/nbt.1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Mi H, Thomas P (2009) PANTHER pathway: An ontology-based pathway database coupled with data analysis tools. In Protein Networks and Pathway Analysis, Nikolsky Y, Bryant J (eds), pp 123–140. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mi H, Huang X, Muruganujan A, Tang H, Mills C, Kang D, Thomas PD (2017) PANTHER version 11: Expanded annotation data from gene ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res 45: D183–D189. 10.1093/nar/gkw1138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156–159. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Walker SE, Lorsch J (2013) RNA purification: Precipitation methods. Meth Enzymol 530: 337–343. 10.1016/b978-0-12-420037-1.00019-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fischer AH, Jacobson KA, Rose J, Zeller R (2008) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. CSH Protoc 2008: pdb.prot4986 10.1101/pdb.prot4986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Masson’s trichrome staining protocol for collagen fibers. Available at http://www.ihcworld.com/_protocols/special_stains/masson_trichrome.htm. Accessed April 3, 2018.
  • 89.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang R-Y, Venter JC, Hutchison CA III, Smith HO (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6: 343–345. 10.1038/nmeth.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments

Data Availability Statement

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NCBI Bioproject repository: Bioproject ID PRJNA531833, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/531833.


Articles from Life Science Alliance are provided here courtesy of Life Science Alliance LLC

RESOURCES